Did Reese Witherspoon or Gwyneth Paltrow set up Jwifty/Jaylor?

Actress Reese Witherspoon, a cast member in the motion picture romantic comedy How Do You Know , attends the premiere of the film at the Mann Village Theatre in the Westwood section of Los Angeles on December 13, 2010. UPI/Jim Ruymen Photo via Newscom

The romance between Jake Gyllenhaal and Taylor Swift is as sweet as a caramel mocha latte and seems made in PR heaven.

However, there’s some confusion about which famous blonde actress first introduced them, Gwyneth Paltrow or Reese Witherspoon.

Recent reports have Gwyneth confirming earlier reports that she “helped” set up Jaylor, and now she’s taking the credit for Jaylor, or GyllenSwift, or whatever nickname they’re going by. She hinted as much to USA Today.

When USA TODAY’s Claudia Puig asked Gwyneth Paltrow if it was true that she had introduced Jake Gyllenhaal to Taylor Swift at a dinner party at the London home she shares with her husband Chris Martin and their children, the Country Strong actress hemmed and hawed.

“Where is this coming from,” she asked, after being told of a web post claiming the new couple had met at Chez Paltrow.

“I’ve just known Jake for a long time and he’s a great guy,” she added, “and Chris has a friendship with Taylor.”

So, did they come to dinner and catch each other’s eye?

“Well, I’m scared to say,” she admitted. “It’s so weird. I wonder how people find out these things. It was a while ago, so I don’t know why it would come out today.”

[USA Today]

Us Weekly also claims Gwynnie is the magic matchmaker.

But National Enquirer printed a story way back in November that Reese Witherspoon took pity on her ex Jake and set him up with Taylor.

Reese Witherspoon still feels so bad about dumping Jake Gyllenhaal that she recently played matchmaker and hooked him up with country cutie Taylor Swift, sources say.

The Brokeback Mountain hunk has been unhappily single since splitting from Reese about a year ago, sources say, while the Oscar-winning actress is seriously dating agent Jim Toth.

…The Legally Blonde star stayed in touch with Jake after their two-year romance ended, and Jake, 29, recently confided that Taylor had caught his eye, said the source.

That’s when Reese, 34, went into matchmaking mode, said the source.

She called the young star — who’s dated Twilight hunk Taylor Lautner, heartthrob Joe Jonas and musician John Mayer — to sing her ex’s praises, said the insider.

“Reese told Taylor that Jake’s a good guy who’s romantic and a lot of fun, but would never take advantage of her,” said the source.

Taylor then invited Jake to accompany her to New York where her friend Emma Stone was hosting Saturday Night Live, said the source.

“Jake and Taylor went to the show, had breakfast the next morning and spend a wonderful weekend together,” said the source.

[National Enquirer, print edition, November 15, 2010]

Admittedly, the Gyllenhaal-Swift hookup strikes me as a little creepy. Why would Jake’s ex and/or his friend feel the need to set him up with someone who hadn’t even turned 21 yet? Eight years isn’t a huge age difference chronologically, but a man about to turn 30 is usually worlds away in maturity level than a young woman just barely able to legally drink.

I have doubts about both the Reese and Gwyneth stories, but there’s probably a grain of truth somewhere in both. I hope Reese didn’t order up a girlfriend for Jake like he was ordering off a menu, and I think Gwyneth is just trying to improve her image as a cold fish so people will go see Country Strong.

However the couple came to be, we should take odds on how long it will last, now that both Jake’s film and Taylor’s album have been released. I’m guessing we’ll get an Us Weekly cover in the next six months or so telling us GyllenSwift are kaput and Jake is heartbroken while Taylor has already written a song about him.

Jake Gyllenhaal arrives for the premiere of Love & Other Drugs at the Directors Guild of America Theater in New York on November 16, 2010.    UPI /Laura Cavanaugh Photo via Newscom

Photo by: KGC11/starmaxinc.com  2010  12/14/10 Gwyneth Paltrow at the premiere of Country Strong . (Beverly Hills, CA)  Photo via Newscom

TAYLOR SWIFT SINGER 2010 AMERICAN MUSIC AWARDS, ARRIVALS DOWNTOWN, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA, USA 21 November 2010 LBM48361 Photo via Newscom

INDIO, CA - APRIL 18:  Actors Jake Gyllenhaal and Reese Witherspoon attend the Jenny Lewis performance during day 1 of the Coachella Valley Music & Arts Festival held at the Empire Polo Club on April 18, 2009 in Indio, California.  (Photo by Frazer Harrison/Getty Images)

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

34 Responses to “Did Reese Witherspoon or Gwyneth Paltrow set up Jwifty/Jaylor?”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. carrie says:

    i like Reese’s dress but i don’t care who helped Toothy Tiles to find a new beard

  2. Quixotic1205 says:

    So Goop or Reese are moonlighting as publicist now? Gaylord is such a fake relationship and I’m not falling for it!

  3. flutters says:

    I think the contract will last long enough to get some people saying that even if it started for PR it turned into a “real” relationship. Taylor and Jake both need this to last longer to achieve their purposes which are to transition Taylor’s image into a more adult image and to help Jake make a mark among her fans plus I guess help him to beat back the gay rumors.

    I give it at least 8 months.

  4. DetRiotgirl says:

    I’m almost ashamed to admit this… But, I kind of want to see Country Strong. It looks like it’s going to be unintentionally funny. If it’s not hilariously terrible, I might like it anyway. I’m not a big fan of romantic Twilight style chick flicks. But, I am sometimes a fan of Coyote Ugly pseudo girl power style chick flicks. I went to see Burlesque because I enjoy train wrecks. But, it turned out to be pretty good on it’s own terms. I think Country Strong might be similar.

    Best trainwreck movie I’ve seen in the theaters: Obsessed, that movie with Beyonce. The entire theater laughed through the last fifteen minutes of the film. It was a really delicious kind of awful.

    PS in case anyone has their judgment glare on right now, I also enjoy intentionally good movies from time to time too.

    *hides red face, fandangos the Black Swan*

  5. bellaluna says:

    Swillenhaal.

  6. lisa says:

    Why no headline that Reese’s movie bombed..I recall a big one regarding Angelina. So Reese has a film that makes less then 10 millon with a 100+ million dollar budget and the headline is some silly crap about who hooked up Jake/Taylor. so high school.. Really does anyone care about this relationship at all.

    NO..Double standard all the time.

  7. eja102 says:

    I’d be scared to date her, knowing she writes disparaging songs about her ex relationships.

  8. Marjalane says:

    I was pretty “meh” on both Taylor and Jake prior to this (snort) relationship, and now I’m thinking they’re both a couple of idiots if they think the public is buying it. And if by some bizarre chance it IS real, well then I think Jake Gyllenhaal is a pathetic excuse for a 30 year old man.

    Also- the papers are calling Reese’s new movie a huge bomb. It came in 7th behind even Yogi Bear and Tangled.

  9. bite me says:

    according to deadline hollywod reese movie cost $120 million, what the fuck, for a romantic comedy

  10. brin says:

    Which “relationship” is more artificially sweet….Jaylor/Jwifty or
    Bomez(Bieber/Gome)?

  11. Louise says:

    I don’t believe they are a couple. The first clear photos of them together was so staged it was creepy. Do people really care who set them up?

    I don’t remember the source but I read a story online that part of the reason it cost so much was everybody got top pay. Reese, Jack, Owen, the rest of the cast, the writer/direct. There was also rewrites and reshoots. Still I don’t get how it cost so much when there isn’t special effects, action sequences, etc.

    Of course there isn’t going to be big headlines like there was for Angelina. When it comes to her, people and the media are always hypocritical. The budget probably won’t be mentioned and definately not the fact it cost $20 million more than The Tourist.

  12. chasingadalia says:

    I’m hoping this mishap is Goopy’s fault, because the idea that Reese could have done it makes me sad.

    Also, @Bellaluna: YES. Swillenhaal FTW.

  13. The Truth Fairy says:

    Gwyneth would take credit for Jesus if she could. She is shameless.

  14. Ambergesa says:

    Haaaaaa truth fairy you are aptly named 😉

  15. Mine says:

    I wondered the something, how come the media is not blasting Reese movie “How do you know” for bombing like they did the Tourist? I think it came in like 8Th place and Yogi Bear ranked higher at 2ND. Any one going to call Reese, Paul Rudd, Jack Nicholson and Owen Wilson’s career over the way they did Angelina Jolie.
    Who ever is responsible for the Jake and Taylor garbage should be ashamed of themselves. Soon as they started that fake mess I was done with his movies. I find it really disgusting and insulting for a grow man to be with that grossly immature nut of a child. Can someone tell that nut Taylor to take off beyonce’s wig, she looks stupid. Look like a little kid found a grown women’s wig in the garbage and put it on.
    PP was my last Jake Gyllenhaal movie. I now believe he is totally gay for pulling this stunt. I will never have respect for this pr fake pairing or Jake again.

  16. Crash2GO2 says:

    Good Lord lisa. What the hell does Angelina have to do with anything here?

  17. Nicky says:

    LMAO that they’re still spinning stories around the London trip and Thanksgiving weekend. Goopy will shamelessly take credit for anything. Didn’t she famously steal the script for ‘Shakespeare In Love’ from Winona Ryder when Gwyneth was dating Ben Affleck?
    There are so many holes and inconsistencies with this “relationship” it beggars belief that anyone would fall for it.
    First they were set up by Maggie after she met Taylor at a charity event (yeah, right), then Reese set them up (already denied by her reps), then Us Weekly claimed Jake had his handlers do the dirty work and now they’re saying it was a combination of Maggie and Goopy? Keep trying!
    Additionally, if this all took place when they were in London, why has this only come out now? Oh yeah, no one’s buying this “romance” and Gwyneth has a movie to promote. So transparent and fake, it makes all involved look shallow and stupid.

  18. B says:

    Oh, who cares who set them up, they’re sweet; short, medium, long-term, beard or whatever (imo).

  19. di butler says:

    All great H’wood romances are born from publicists hiring beards. So, so romantic.

    I thought most ppl had decided this couple’s name was GAYLOR?

  20. mollination says:

    Oh I really hope they don’t break up. I’m finding this all endlessly intriguing and amusing. Everyone hates them together so much – I really want them to secretly click like no one was expecting and make it for a while.

  21. Rosanna says:

    Reese is becoming Jenny Macarthy lookalike

  22. Mine says:

    I like the name Gaylor. That’s what I’m going to use for these two.

  23. truthSF says:

    @The Truth Fairy:

    “Gwyneth would take credit for Jesus if she could. She is shameless.”

    I choked on my popcorn reading your comments thankyouverymuch. 🙂

    @butler:

    GAYLOR for the win!!!

  24. JenJen says:

    LOL,the only time an woman sings the “praises” of her ex to fix him up, he is bad in bed. Taylor is young,so she won’t know any better. John the jerk doesn’t count,he’s asexual or just a pent up frustrated gay guy scared to come out. I think Jakie did that a long time ago.

  25. Matt says:

    @The Truth Fairy:

    “Gwyneth would take credit for Jesus if she could. She is shameless.”

    HAHAHA – you took the words right out of my mouth – this sums up the insufferable woman perfectly! Thank you.

  26. munchies says:

    Jake can drop taylor now. Zac is officially single.

  27. Johnthing says:

    Jake is waaaaay too old for Swifty.

  28. Kaye says:

    I don’t get the hostility/disbelief about the relationship. Why can’t it be what it is? I am not naive or easily manipulated by publicists, and it just doesn’t seem “off” to me.

  29. sapphire says:

    @ Kaye (sorry, but the number blurred your name) I think for a lot of us the whole contrived nature of “apple picking, ice cream, going for coffee” with the PR sources doing overtime just feels wrong. Too sterotyped for Swifty’s image, too close to a national release for Jake.

    To me it clanks like Anniston/Butler, which even the flacks abandoned after a week or two.

  30. Frankly says:

    Swiffenhaal! Dammit! I will fight for Swiffenhaal until, well, all the cat hair and dryer lint has been Swiffened out of my haal.

  31. Ari says:

    I strongly believe that women mature faster than men (girls vs boys) so perhaps Swift is at the same mental level that Jake is right now…regardless if he wanted to get married and make babies with Reese…I think Reese is doing definitely better with her age group and higher of men.

  32. original kate says:

    “I’m almost ashamed to admit this… But, I kind of want to see Country Strong. It looks like it’s going to be unintentionally funny. If it’s not hilariously terrible”

    @ detriotgirl: no shame here, missy! mr. original kate & i go to montana at christmas (his fam lives there) and i plan on seeing “country strong” with his sister in montana because i don’t want to see it in seattle. why? because someone i know might see me leaving the theater. hilariously terrible, indeed.

  33. candy says:

    Jake was too young and immature for Reese, perfect for little Taylor. She needs a good protector. The boys won’t do for her sweet sensibilities. I’m predicting marriage and babies. Unless of course Jake decides to pursue Anne Hathaway. They’ve got a little spark going on.

  34. Nicky says:

    @candy, “I’m prediciting marriage and babies”.

    I’ve noticed that’s the only thing you ever say about these two. Every single post, you use that line. Weird.
    Not going to happen, this faux-mance exists purely for those who choose to believe the journalistic integrity of crappy tabloids and for the purpose of pushing whatever products or new image their publicists are trying to sell to the public now.