First photos of Knox and Vivienne Jolie-Pitt are here

Update 2: It’s not a big conspiracy and just looks like some mismanagement on People’s part. The story is now up on People’s homepage nearly a half an hour after their announced release time, after it was posted then removed. The babies are so little and fragile-looking, although you can see one of them smile sleepily as Brad and Angelina look on adoringly. An inset photo features little two year old Shiloh holding one of them.

Update: Apparently posted the cover of the magazine in their “News” section briefly, but never added the story to the front page. Within five minutes, it was removed. Thanks to Lena for the link to ONTD’s mirror of the cover and article. Angelina calls their house “chaos,” and Brad says it’s a “a cuckoo’s nest,” but it also sounds like they’re having a lot fun. Angelina talks about how her two older daughters help out and calls them “little mommies.” And apparently there are just 19 pages of photos, not 30 as previously reported:

They are just 3 weeks old, but twins Knox Léon and Vivienne Marcheline are about to take the world by storm.

In an exclusive interview and photos, Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie offer PEOPLE an intimate look at their growing family.

“It is chaos, but we are managing it and having a wonderful time,” Jolie tells PEOPLE of daily life at the Château Miraval in Provence, France, where the couple’s four older children – Maddox, 6, Pax, 4, Zahara, 3, and Shiloh, 2 – have been enjoying a summer of outdoor play (hide-and-seek is a favorite) on the château’s sprawling grounds.

Adds Pitt: “[It’s] still a cuckoo’s nest.”

Fortunately, they already have some household helpers. “[Shiloh] and Z pick out [the twins’] clothes and help change and hold them,” says Jolie. “It’s sweet – they are little mommies.”

For the complete story, including 19 pages of intimate family photos and the full interview with Brad and Angelina, pick up this week’s issue of PEOPLE, on newsstands Monday

[From and removed, via ONTD]

The first photos of three week old fraternal boy and girl twins Knox Léon and Vivienne Marcheline Jolie-Pitt were supposed to premiere on tonight at 7pm EDT. The magazine’s website has had red banner at the top of their homepage since Friday announcing the much-anticipated debut of the twins. At about 7:05 they removed the banner, though, with no explanation of when we could expect to see the first photo online.

They have a reported 30 freaking page spread coming out in People tomorrow that cost the magazine $14 million, which was split with UK publication Hello. It’s possible someone at People made the stupid executive decision at the last minute not to put the photos online or to wait until tomorrow. They won’t lose much in advance publicity considering how well the issue will sell. It still seems like a very short-sighted decision that may cost them repeat traffic to their website. I know it’s going to disappoint a lot of their Internet readers. We’ll have to see how they handle this tomorrow, and I’ll ask JayBird to see if anything goes up tonight before she goes to bed. I’m in Europe where it’s past 1:00 am now and this ten minute delay with no apology on their site has pissed me off royally.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

196 Responses to “First photos of Knox and Vivienne Jolie-Pitt are here”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. NB says:

    there is a pic up on as of 1h UK time.

  2. hello says:


  3. Celebitchy says:

    Thank you! They had it up for a moment in the news section, and then removed it. I will update the post.

  4. daisy424 says:

    Great pictures, People’s cover shots are better than Hello.

    Too Cute!! Shiloh is a peanut.

    They all look so happy. Good for them!

    *Taking a drink of my Mimosa*

    Thanks CB.

  5. angiee says:

    On the cover, Shiloh holding one of the twins is too cute. =]

  6. janie says:

    those pics aren’t as cute as shiloh’s.

  7. Ethan says:

    I agree- we should boycott these media whores.

    More than half of Angelina’s income coms from her children.

    It’s a shame Brangelina exploit their children that way and have had 6 children in 2 years.

    They treat their children as products and publicity props.

  8. Syko says:

    Looks like these babies got Mom’s lips too. They’re so adorable, and Shiloh holding the baby is just precious. I love looking at babies. Taking care of them? Someone else do it, please.

    The front of People says it’s a 19 page photo spread, not 30. I’m not buying it anyway. Although I may riffle through it while buying groceries next weekend. 🙂

    I’m not even getting into the arguments with the haters tonight, as a BADette, I’m off duty on weekends. But y’all keep on, and I’ll get to you tomorrow.

  9. Kaiser says:

    THE LIPS!!!

    Oh, the beh-behs are cute too. Love love love. Shiloh is getting so big!

  10. Kaiser says:

    Goddamn moderation. I was just telling Ethan and hello to suck it.

  11. daisy424 says:

    I second that 😉

  12. Kaiser says:

    @Daisy – my original comment is obscenity-laced and not for the faint of heart. Perhaps moderated out of a sense of decency?

  13. daisy424 says:

    You sound like my kind of drinking buddy Kaiser.
    Ciao for now.

  14. Celebitchy says:

    I updated the post with a much better picture from Hello! Hit reload to see it. Kaiser that comment you wrote was a bit too harsh and will not see the light of day.

  15. Kristin says:

    I don’t get it. They look like any old baby. They could have just taken some new borns and said they were the twins.

  16. huh says:

    What’s a “BADette”?

    Secret Celebitchy cult? Is there some sort of secret “Skull and Bones” like ceremony?

  17. Kaiser says:

    LOL, CB…just as well. Just don’t understand the need of some to obsessively hater-troll.

  18. candyass says:

    I am so tired of these people. They both are just so-so actors anyways.

  19. Anastasia says:

    Good deal, hello and Ethan. Boycott them. VERY good idea. So we won’t expect to see your user names in the comments of Angelina threads again, right? Or any variation that is actually you under a different name, right?

    Good. Stick to that. It’s about time some of you started taking my advice. I do that with certain celebrities I’m not even going to bother to name, because I ignore them THAT much.

    That being said, the dark headed one is the girl. I figured out that much, LOL. Shiloh gets more adorable by the dadgummed DAY, and these pics are great. I don’t buy magazines at all (I’m trying to save money) so I won’t be buying these issues, but it’s cool to see the pics.

  20. Anastasia says:

    candyass: there are celebrities I’m really tired of, too. I refuse to even read anything about them, much less comment in articles about them.

    I’ve felt much better since adopting that practice. I sincerely suggest trying it.

  21. Mairead says:

    God love you CB; it’s an unholy hour for you to be looking at baby-pics 😆

    Kristen – if it weren’t for the lips on the darker-haired baby, I would completely agree with you (so as it stands I just agree with you 😉 ) Anyway, they have the required amount of heads, limbs, fingers and toes, so that’s all that really matters.

    huh – there is indeed an initiation ceremony. It requires making up the most random of cocktails and getting absolutely blotto (real-drunk or cyber-drunk is acceptable 😆 )

  22. Carla says:

    Any one notice Angelina and Brad Pitt’s body language in the pictures. Kinda disconnected. Happens when you have too many kids all at once. You start disliking each other.

    Well, the little twins are no big deal, like I knew they wouldn’t be. I have seen better looking three week old babies. This child pimping gets old after a while. Brad and Angelina seem stresses despite the photo shop. I guess they would be with all the kids to run after, even when you have nannies. They should have waited longer before showing them. They look like rats, and not cute rats. They will grow into their looks.

  23. Larissa says:

    they´re so cute!!!

  24. James says:

    Not a big fan of Ms Jolie’s night robe.

    So now we’ve seen the babies, what’s next?

  25. ugh says:

    Ah, the look on Brad and Angie’s face — you know what they’re thinking… those little bastards just made us $14 million !!!!

  26. Mike says:

    Wow. I haven’t seen anything this fake since “A Joan Crawford Christmas.”

  27. Anni says:

    aww…they are cute! those lips are dynamite!

  28. disgusted says:

    Didn’t they just complain about the media intruding on their lives and yet they SELL photos of their KIDS. What kind of people do that?
    I am disgusted by this entire family…..

    i wish the paparazzi hound these two and their families for ever ever

  29. rose says:

    Would have been nice if People Magazine would have put a picture of ALL of their children on the cover not just the biological ones. Pretty sure it was just an oversight on their part?
    The babies are cute with their big ol’ lips !!

  30. KDRockstar says:

    Papa Pitt is looking mighty tired these days. I cannot imagine that many kids in one house.

    The pose reminds me of the one for Shiloh… on the bed, looking adoringly at the peanut. Meh. I’d rather see Maddox strangling Pax in a headlock while Ang tries to run around breastfeeding both babies and Z is yanking Shiloh’s hair.

  31. Carla says:

    🙄 I like the quotes, trying to make it seem like everything is rosy. NOT. If you have one kids and you think you are losing it sometimes, try six with twins. No wonder the photo shop could not hide their aged looks.

    I am also wondering why they put emphasis on the bio kids. I imagine Brad and Angelina agreed to these covers. Telling…..

    Vivi’s mouth is going to be open all the time like Shilohs.

    On the whole, now that this is done, what next for these two to seek attention? I wonder. Atleast they made more than Angelina made from movies in a year.

  32. SixxKitty says:

    So tiny! Shi is just a sweetie!

  33. James says:

    Forgot to drop a line before I check out:

    Plan B Production Co. — we produce babies not films!

    I bet Ms Aniston will come out to claim that was her original idea before she and Mr Pitt filed for divorce.

  34. Anastasia says:

    It must be a CONSPIRACY, y’all! ZOMG! Angelina has put poor poor Brad into a horrible trance with her amazing vagina powers!

    No. No, that’s not it. Actually they are BOTH in cahoots to POPULATE THE WORLD with their children, both bio and adopted! Muwahahahahaaaaa!! Yes, that’s it!

    Or no, even better: they are going to have 32 biological children so that they can just stop making movies. No wait, she still makes movies. Erm, so that theory doesn’t float. Otherwise she’d have retired by now. Shoot.

    Ok ok I’ve got it: really this is a conspiracy to MAKE YOU INSANE WITH JEALOUSY OF THEM! Yes! And it’s workign on some of you! Watch out, A&B are sending their amazing death rays into your brains where your dura matter will slowly dissolve as you turn into a puddle of hatred and jealousy! You just wish that you could have three babies in two years and still look like that! You wish you had all their money! They adopt children, too! And give millions to charity! And are movie stars! It drives you CRAZY insane, admit it.

    The two best looking people in the world get together and reproduce and it causes paroxyms of insane hatred amongst those prone to it!

    God, I had no idea A&B were so incredibly powerful. I’m really kind of impressed with their plans to take over the world!

    But on a more serious note: those of you making ugly comments about the babies are really gross. They’re babies. No matter what you think of the parents you don’t get to decide who you get born to. Try to grow up.

  35. wfb says:

    They’re a beautiful family. Beautiful all around. Shiloh’s so cute.

  36. Steph says:

    What a surprise… they look like three week old babies

  37. Bodhi says:

    If one were to boycott the Jolie-Pitt family, wouldn’t one avoid the posts about them? Oh, that’d be way to logical…

    Sweet little peanuts! All the kiddos! 😀

  38. Shane says:

    Adorable beautiful babies and Shiloh takes the cake.

    I hope they hire enough help.

    Word to Jennifer Maniston: freeze your eggs since you are in a perpetual player stage nowadays chasing pretty boys at age 39……

  39. Snowblood says:

    YAY!! The pictures are here! Well, almost. I can’t wait to see the full spread & read the article. So, who was it here who predicted that the twins would have Angelina’s famous lips? It was one of the BADettes, and she was RIGHT! Especially the one twin, the one on Jolie’s side of the photo. They’re tiny little munchkins, aren’t they? They were only 5 pounds apiece when they were born three weeks ago, so no wonder. I can’t wait to see them at Shiloh’s age…

    Anastasia, that post just above was funny, you nailed it regarding OMG HaterTroll Phenomenon. 😆

    Well, it’s a mellow Sunday evening, and tomorrow there’s sure to be a new Jolie-Pitt Family thread, so I’ll pass out celebratory flutes of Veuve Cliquot to all here who’d like to celebrate the Arrival and Photographic Proof of the Twin Messiahs!

    *raises champagne, drinks down contents in one fell swoop. Bubbles spuitter out of nose. Giggles set in immediately thereafter.*

    Congratulations, Angelina and Brad!

  40. cara says:

    The cover is so………WHITE!

  41. Alex says:

    I don’t understand your weird proto-logic. Damned dirty apes.

    1.) They aren’t keeping the money – it is for charity.

    2.) If they agree to pics, they can abate the media frenzy a bit and also control the setting, personnel, final prints, etc.

    All I see is a media-savvy couple who understands the pics will be shot anyway, so why not have control over it and make some money for charity? Y

    ou may not agree with the idea of allowing the media to snap pics of your kids even for that, which is understandable, but regardless it certainly is a far cry from selling their baby souls to the media for 14 mill for mom and dad’s next..10000 tattoos.

  42. hmmph says:

    Sooooo, the ADOPTED ones didn’t make the cover!!!!! Kiss my a..

  43. Jenna says:

    Shiloh is adorable!

    Yup… looks like one is dark headed and the other light.

    Can’t wait to see what they look like later. I wonder if they will favor Angelina more? We all know Shiloh favors Brad except for those lips!

  44. czarina says:

    Awww, these photos just make me want to…BUY BRAD A RAZOR!!!
    Yeesh! It’s amazing–he can look really fantastic (clean cut and in a tux), but this shaggy-haired goatee nastiness he has going on…
    Maybe they should keep the money for the pictures and just go ahead and hire Brad a stylist. Or, as I said, buy the poor guy a razor.
    (my shallowness for the day!)
    As for the photos, I absolutely think getting them out to a managaize ASAP is the best thing this couple can do–especially when they are being stalked by paparazzi cammied up in the woods!
    I know some people think of them as desperate for media attention, but how do you recognize the difference between their wanting attention and their getting it whether they want it or not?
    If they DON’T want it and still get it, how do they get rid of it (especially when there seems to be such an insatiable market for news about them?)
    I mean, seriously, what can they do beyond not making movies, never letting the children out of the house and moving to, I don’t know, the moon??

  45. Amy says:

    I thought the same thing when I saw the People cover. Where are their adopted children of color? Maybe I’m reading too much into it, but that definitely jumped out at me. Also, I have a two-year-old and there is no way in hell I would let him hold a newborn! Even if he was sitting down!

  46. xiaoecho says:

    Those Voight lips again!

  47. Anastasia says:

    Well these photos were specifically to show the world the new babies. Hasn’t everyone seen their other children like seven brazillion times? Is there some specific reason everyone needs to see them again? Have you forgotten what Pax and Maddox and Zahara and Shiloh look like or something? Also, unless you’ve seen the 19 page spread, you can’t say for sure their other kids AREN’T in this.

    The same people who call them media whores then turn around and bitch if they don’t put out pics of EVERY SINGLE kid every SINGLE time? That makes no sense whatsoever.

    When Shiloh was born, the pics were of (gasp!) Shiloh.

    You know when you have new members of the family and the family is already quite big, it’s kind of nice when they can have just a moment that is just their own. Especially since it will probably be the last, LOL!

    Unless every single picture taken of you since you became a parent ALSO includes every single one of your kids, you have no room to talk.

  48. Anastasia says:

    Amy, really? I’ve seen lots of two year olds hold newborns. They’re usually propped up on a bed, as Shiloh seems to be, and there are about sixteen adult hands standing at the ready just in case, and the kid holds the baby for about 10 seconds, tops.

    They do ok. Really! It’s usually just for a cute pic. A lot of second time parents do this with their older toddler.

  49. Leandra says:

    The 14 Mill is for pics of the twins……I’m sure the “adopted” children as you call them are doing just fine and not worrying too much because they’re not on the “cover”…lol.

  50. Scott F. says:

    I don’t care all that much about the kids either way – but the idea they can’t get away from the paps if they REALLY wanted to is laughable.

    A couple guys I served with in Iraq now operate a civilian protection service that caters to celebs and businessmen. You would be ASTOUNDED at the lengths some of these people go to avoid being messed with by fans and the press – and get this, it actually WORKS!

    You start by purchasing a ‘small’ mansion (you know, where you don’t have to patrol 60 freaking acres with a handful of people). You electrify the fence, put guard shacks ever 100 yards or so, install motion sensors that can pick up people trying to jump the wall – problem solved.

    Mel Gibson was one of the first major celebs to go this route, and it has turned out to be a pretty foolproof system.

    I am just tired of hearing ANY celeb bitch about their ‘privacy’. If you want it badly enough, and you have the kind of money they do, you can make it happen. Paps are stupid, but they’re not suicidal.

    It’s a BS argument anyways – because they still could have released a few digital camera shots within hours or days of them being born, made no money off of it, and still avoided the pap mobs.

    This has never been about their privacy, it’s just another shrewd PR decision. I also agree with a few other posters – why do they only show the biological kids now? I suppose third world orphans just aren’t photogenic enough now that you’ve got all these ‘perfect’ genetic specimens around, huh?

  51. Steph says:

    Snowblood, you are freaking weird.

  52. texasmom says:

    Wow! I can’t believe how tired they look. It makes me feel much better about how I looked when my kids were born. If THESE two can look that haggard, then. . .

    Anyone remember that Simpsons episode where Apu has octuplets? At one point there is a door with a sign that reads “Danger: Newborns”! My feelings exactly!

  53. Sleepy says:

    I think the complaints about only the biological kids being on the cover isn’t about the twins being front and center (as others have pointed out this is their outting). It’s about People putting a picture of Shiloh with one of the twins in the corner of the COVER – and ONLY Shiloh with a twin. If the picture of Shiloh wasn’t there I don’t think there would be complaints about “biological kids” because people would obviously expect the twins to be front and center but Shiloh being there too is putting extra attention to her (the other biological child) on her siblings’ day while leaving the other kids (the adopted kids) off – and it seems deliberately done by People. Or at least to me. I would certainly hope ALL children are inside the issue, but the issue about the biological kids is about the cover – not the inside. IMO, it should have just been Brad, Angelina, and the twins only on the cover. If they wanted a second pic in the corner of the cover all the kids (including the adopted ones) should have been in it, imo. I think a picture of all the kids would have been very, very sweet on the front, and would have highlighted the whole group – which you would think Brad and Angelina would want.

    But back to the twins they are cute and I’m sure the pictures inside are cute too. I don’t buy People anymore but I’ll probably flip through it to look or look at them online.

  54. LiLi says:

    i’m glad shiloh is on the cover- i love when the closest in age sibling holds the newborn- it’s not as cute when the 6yr.old holds the baby.
    and IF any of the other kids had been featured on the cover, all the haters would be out with their “oh typipal angelina ignoring the blob.”
    they just can’t win with that topic.
    hope they are enjoying the little angels 😀

  55. pamela says:

    Oh My Gosh!!! These pictures are adorable. Brad and Angie are so beautiful, and look contented and happy. And as for Miss Shiloh, that picture with her and her baby sister is to die for. That is hella precious.

    I will be buying the People magazine as soon as it comes to my bookstore. Can’t wait.

  56. pamela says:

    Trolls are on ignore for me tonight. These pictures are too beautiful to spoil responding to idiots. Let them froth and foam at the mouths to their hearts content. Not going to bother me.

  57. Jill says:

    I have to agree with some of the posters– it seems like in this whole twin madness I keep hearing about Shiloh and her new baby brother and sister, and they forget the others– they’re part of the family too! Not that the picture of Shiloh isn’t adorable though.

  58. Jaundice Machine says:

    These pictures make my ovaries sigh.
    Damn you Jolie-Pitts and your (presumably) beautiful spawn!

  59. devilsadvocate says:

    WHO CARES??????????? Do we have anything better to clamor about than the birth of 2 bastard children. Two years from now Brangelina will be long over with. Just like every other Hollywood union.

  60. Reality Check says:

    Awwww look at that the kids are adorable one of them is even smiling. ..maybe knox or viv is thinking awwww losers are all gonna be marinating with hate when they see us aren’t we all cute.

  61. Reality Check says:

    for those complaining who cares? I think all of you do because if you don’t care you wouldn’t be here reading this post and commenting 🙄

  62. czarina says:

    It is the magazine editors and staff who decide which pictures will be in the magazine or on the cover.
    I’m not sure if the complaints are towards Brad and Angie or the media themselves regarding the “adopted” children.
    (and last year wasn’t there a big boo-hoo about Angelina not loving Shiloh as much as her ‘adopted’ kids? Talk about never pleasing anyone ANY of the time!!)

  63. candyass says:

    Wow some people are really rude. I just said I was tired about hearing about them and I dont understand why people are so obsessed with them?

  64. devilsadvocate says:

    Wow….you got me there, Reality. Does your Mommy know you’re up this late?

  65. pamela says:

    czarina, never mind the trolls. They are grasping at straws.

  66. Snowblood says:

    They really are! 😆

  67. Jaundice Machine says:

    I just think little itty bitty babies tug at my fallopian tubes . . . I really couldn’t care less who queefed them out.

  68. huh says:

    I was 2 when my sister was born and there are plenty of pics of me holding her…sure I am sitting down, like Shiloh, and my sister is resting on a pillow, I don’t think that’s a big deal.

  69. Tania says:

    #3 and #8 – Just how, exactly, are Brad and Angelina media whores? If anything, they shun the spotlight, unlike some other “celebrities” such as Mariah Carey, Paris Hilton, Britney Spears, etc. Brad and Angelina sold their twins baby pics to the highest bidder and are donating all that money to charity. I wonder how many other “celebrities” can claim that?! Mariah was going to have a second wedding ceremony (beyond ridiculous and WHO CARES?), but she passed on the idea when she realized no press would be bidding for the photos and thus, paying for her second wedding in the process. Mariah Carey is a media whore! Leave Brad and Angelina alone! They are wonderful people and a beautiful (physically as well as spiritually) family. Boycott if you want, it wont make much of a difference as most people love and admire the Jolie-Pitts! They care about more than just themselves. They are true philanthropists and will be remembered for their work on and off the screen.

  70. Tania says:

    #62 – You should never call ANY child a bastard! How dare you? It doesn’t matter how they got here and who their parents may be … all children are precious and should be treasured. Shame on you!

  71. blip says:

    wow… they’re so cute 🙂

    i can’t wait to have my baby in february,
    all the best for brad & angie 🙂

  72. Reality Check says:


    Wow….you got me there, Reality. Does your Mommy know you’re up this late?

    Does the administrator of the mental institution knows you’re using the office computer?

  73. geronimo says:

    Very sweet. Those lips! Much prefer the Hello! cover to the people one tho’, much more natural and real looking. They even look a bit knackered.

    Since the article talks about ‘new mommies’ Zahara and Shiloh, shame they didn’t use an insert pic featuring both with the twins? How cute would that have been. Think People made a poor decision there. It IS a very white cover, almost the first thing that went through my mind when I saw it. Not stirring, just saying.

  74. someone says:

    Well, Im sure Jon Voight bought a copy of People, since thats the only way he will ever see what his grandbabies look like…if Angie was so “mother teresa like” as all her fans seem to think..she could find it in heart to forgive her father, and let him meet his grandchildren…

  75. kelly says:

    ‘We are like a cucoon…’ Brad

    No you’re not! you are self centred, ego centric, pyschotic, obsessive baby collecting, child pimping, media whores who will do anything for attention and PR for the brangelina brand which has become your major source of income. These twins are the latest product of the brand, an adoptee will soon follow, for Zahara this time because she is the only black in the family.

    And whoever thinks that the cover of a magazine would go out without the sanctioning of these two greedy media savvy losers is just plain naive, of course they knew what the cover would look like, but they never even thought it would be an issue that only bio kids made it on the covers, they are probably too tired from the lack of sleep and all they want is the cheque.

  76. wfb says:

    Kelly why is it your business if they wanted to adopt or have biological kids? Does it in anyway affect the way you live your life? Leave them alone, they are doing just fine with or without your vitriol.

  77. Cari says:

    @ Kelly

    Huh? Did I miss something? When did Brad say “we are like a cucoon”? I saw something about a cuckoo’s nest, but nothing about a “cucoon”, whatever the hell that is. OH! you meant cocoon!!! Yeah, except he didn’t say that either. But nice try, Kelly. Here’s a napkin to wipe the foam off your mouth.

  78. geronimo says:

    “‘We are like a cucoon…’ Brad”

    Learn to quote properly, why dontcha? If you don’t know what he meant by ‘cuckoo’s nest’ (= madhouse), fair enough. Don’t be embarrassed. I think the word you were trying to put into his mouth was cocoon. And a ‘cucoon’ (I googled just to further your ed.) is apparently a condom dispenser. The things you learn. 😐

  79. kelly says:

    Gosh, I could’t be bothered to check for the actual word. Didn’t care that much. Just coming here drains my energies. is wondering why their site has not yet crushed with demand .lol. they are surprised at the luke warm response to covers that were supposed to ‘take the world by a storm’. Well, I told you, pay that money at your own peril. it will not all go to charity and the magazine sales will not be worth it. Ironically if they had put the other non white kids there too, maybe it would have garnered more sales.

    I hope no one buys these magazines and every one flips through them on the stands.

    just thinking about it, Gwen Stephanie was due at the end of last month. we haven’t seen her in weeks, has she had her baby yet?

  80. Reality Check says:

    Kelly it’s not your money so stop worrying. Believe me people will buy why is that you want to believe the worst for these two people? Did they kill a member of your family?

  81. Shane says:

    Shiloh made the cover with the twins because Shiloh is the other child the general public MOST WANTS to see and therefore will sell the most magazines.

    Shiloh is the other child of theirs I most wanted to see.

    If Shiloh on the cover without the adoptees bothers you, there are other issues in your life bothering you. Who cares which children of theirs are most popular with the general public? Who cares if the general public primarily wants to see their biological kids? The people who most often buy this magazine are white. This isn’t a terrible thing, just a simple explanation as to why Shiloh makes the cover. She’s their (angelic and adorable) biological child, and generates greater interest with the magazine buying public.

    I STILL can’t stand the thought of Shiloh (or these babies for that matter) at age 18 entering a tattoo shop and getting their first of many trashy tattoos.

    No no no!! Don’t do it Shiloh!!

    You are beautiful just how you are. If you like a particular symbol or picture, frame it and hang it on a wall!!

  82. xiaoecho says:

    geronimo………So that’s what those grubby things in the toilets are called!

    The things you learn…..except spelling

  83. geronimo says:

    Xia, for the sake of accuracy, a ‘cucoon’ is actually a bizarre, designery brand of dispenser, not like normal ones. Just wanted to clarify since there’s enough misinformation on here already. 😉
    Read the desc. for a belly laugh. Every home should have a cuckoo-dispensing condom gizmo.

  84. Mairead says:

    But – I thought the thing about cuckoos was that they left their eggs in the nests of other birds to raise? So in reality the cuckoo’s nest is probably a fairly serene place 😐

    Is Bradders confused or more capable of subtle analogies than I gave him credit for? 😆

  85. Cameron says:

    People Magazine probably chose to leave out the adopted children just to incite controversy and attention from folks who otherwise wouldn’t care about celebrity baby spread #437. A family portrait would have been too predictable. I guess People Magazine decided that biological white family + controversy would sell better than unmarried white couple + multi-ethnic children.

  86. geronimo says:

    Cuckoo’s nest – pejorative term for an insane asylum. Cuckoo as in crazy, in this instance. Crazy house.

  87. Syko says:

    Gwen Stephanie? 😆

    Odd that I never even noticed that only the Caucasian children were on the cover. I guess that’s because I don’t really think of the others as non-Caucasians. I don’t look at Pax and think “Oh, Vietnamese kid”, I just think “cute kid”.

  88. daisy424 says:

    It’s just too easy isn’t it Syko 🙂

  89. clover says:

    brangeloonies can get rlly mean when u dont have the same opinion as them.u guys seriouly need to calm down and stop making personal attacks just because some people dont agree with u gius on some stuff. and as for the jealousy part, seriously? if they rlly wanted to sell their baby’s pics they shldve waited longer. at this age, they all look the same. that being said,i still dislike angie, she’s trying to be someone who she’s rlly not. she’ll go back to her old ways. wait and see!!

  90. vdantev says:

    Sorry, you have to be a stone cold soulless waste of life to not see those babies say anything but precious. Get therapy, haters.

  91. clover says:

    yes, we dint say they’re not precious. geez, jst because we feel differently abt these ppl, we need therapy?

  92. Kaiser says:

    Kelly = Barfy Lola

    I would recognize that frothing/barfing mouth, Cruise obsession (on the other thread) and general insanity anywhere.

    You know what I like about these pics – and the Shiloh newborn photos? How natural they are. Even though I was loathe to hate on J.Lo & Marc Anthony, those were the baby pics that were over the top.

    Other than that… well, it looks like a lot of people skipped Mad Men to hate on The Brange. Bad choices, Trolls.

  93. Mairead says:

    I know Syko, like you I look at Pax and just think he looks like a cute nice boy-

    I look at Maddox and think “Cool Kid”
    I look at Shiloh and think “Pretty little moppet”
    I look at Ms. Z and think “Mein Leader” 😯

  94. vdantev says:

    Sooooo, the ADOPTED ones didn’t make the cover!!!!! Kiss my a..

    Because this cover is about the NEWBORNS you idiot, or did you sleep through that part ? 🙄

  95. Nan says:

    I see we have fans from another blog on here. You’ve all admitted it & I’m a fan of that blog also. Please people, do not attempt to imitate Mike K’s writing style in your posts here. It just comes off as lame-o. I’m referring to one of the 1st 25 posts on here. Can I please request we keep the posts true to the stylish style of this blog & not be practically IMing each other? Someone said here that though they love that other blog they do not comment on there & save reading the comments on CB. Amen. This really the only celeb blog worth reading the comments. CB is quality not quantity. Keep up the good work CB!

  96. vdantev says:

    yes, we dint say they’re not precious. geez, jst because we feel differently abt these ppl, we need therapy?

    Try English.

  97. countrybabe says:

    disgusted so true, they had to have made the deal to sell the pictures a while back. These two are desperate for attention.

    And ugh, 2 hours on a photo shoot 14 million. Brad doesn’t make money that fast in movies. Gee that’s the same money Ange makes in a whole year.

    DOn’t worry Shane Shiloh,Viv and Knox will probably be with Brad at that point. Not that he’s a good role model.

    I’ve noticed that too Cameron. Those poor children I knew this would happen. Well they’ll have alot money to lean on while they write their mommy dearest books.

    I’m sure Brad and Ange okayed the cover.
    Sleepy I would have expected a family picture on the cover, to tone it down and not make it about these two. We know they go paid for them.

  98. clover says:

    haha vdantev is a good example of how protective brangeloonies are over their precious angie. its disgusting. u guys are like lifeless people refreshing the page over and over again. haha. i better leave, im becoming as lifeless as u guys refreshing the page.

  99. geronimo says:

    Don’t agree with the ‘deliberate attempt to provoke’ posts but can’t quite understand what’s wrong with thinking (in my case) a shot of Shiloh AND Zahara with a twin each would have made a cuter than cute image on the cover, since Z’s one of the ‘little mommies’ referred to in the article. Nothing to do with colour. Just a cute pic. That’s all. *Mumbles something unprintable about PC crap* 🙄

  100. daisy424 says:

    I agree Mairead, Ms.Z kicks ass

  101. Kaiser says:

    I think the ZOMG HATERTROLLS don’t really make their hateful case well when they end their posts with “We know they go paid for them” or “wait and see!!”


  102. A.J. says:

    Babies are babies. They all look the same to me.
    And no, before some of you pscyhotically-obsessed Brangeloonies jump on the defensive, that’s not an attack on your deities. I’m just saying that when they are so young, it’s hard to differentiate one baby from the other- regardless of whom their parents are.
    Newborns all look like miniature old men, all shriveled up and weak, in my eyes. Cute, but not really that exciting.


  103. Syko says:

    Don’t let the door hit you in the ass on the way out, Clover.

    Seriously, why do people (or is it “ppl”?) even come into these threads if their hate for the two actors is so rabid? And then if you try to counter their hysteria with common sense, that makes you a Brangeloony? Seems to me that the wrong group got the “loony” attached to its name.

    @Mairead – love your comment! I read in an article that Z and Shiloh pick the twins’ clothing and play mommy with them. You can just bet who’s in charge of that operation!

  104. vdantev says:

    u guys are like lifeless people refreshing the page over and over again.

    Interesting coming from a mouth breather whose too dumb to use complete words. I guess 3 letters is too much to ask.

  105. daisy424 says:

    Syko, it’s person, not people.
    Singular, not plural. Too obvious.
    She loves talking to herself.

    Amen vdantev.

  106. Kaiser says:

    Wait and see, vdantev!!!! We know they go paid for them. 🙂

  107. Enonymous says:

    Geez, while reading this thread I have heard nothing else then the same Bradangelina fanatics going on about hater this and hater that in every post. For God sake, let the other people express their opinions with out you all ALWAYS getting so defensive and rude. If YOU do not like their comments, then take your own advise and do not read it.

    Clover, I agree with you.

    PS. All the girls in the cover look pretty and very sweet.

  108. Syko says:

    Everyone is welcome to express any opinion whatsoever. It’s the hysterical, grasping at straws, looking for something to be pissy about, clinging to past offenses, pretending to know how people’s minds work, claiming to know all about financial situations, searching for offenses to whine about, and general hatred oozing from the posts that gets all us BADettes in an uproar. State your opinion reasonably, and we’re all okay with it.

  109. clover says:

    amen enonymous. thats what i said in the first place i tried to point it out to them. but they called me an idiot and apparently, we have to type in full form.

  110. Enonymous says:

    Syko, I agree, but you and your friends should take your advise and stop taking all the comments so personally because unless this comments are directed to you personally then there is no reason you should get so offended.

    However, people should be responsible and not use the word bastard when referring to any child because that is disrespectful and hurtful.

  111. clover says:

    i said “yes, we dint say they’re not precious. geez, jst because we feel differently abt these ppl, we need therapy? ”

    and vdantev said” Because this cover is about the NEWBORNS you idiot, or did you sleep through that part ?”

    sure syko, thats a great way of putting it. and try english? seriously? do i have to type p-e-o-p-l-e, it is generally known ppl=people.

  112. KERRI says:

    I love this family. Can’t get enough of them. I wish them all health and happiness! Would love to see Brad and Angelina get married.

  113. Kaiser says:

    Another bullshit “meta” argument, Enon?

    “stop taking all the comments so personally because unless this comments are directed to you personally then there is no reason you should get so offended.”

    So take your own advice, Enon. Don’t be offended by the Trolls or the BADettes. Don’t play the sanctimonious judge. Stop taking it personally.

  114. spheretwo says:

    geez kaiser, dont you ever stop?

  115. A.J. says:

    It’s always amusing to see just how insane people get over these larger than life people they don’t know. On one hand there are the Brangeloonies, defenders of all that is holy. And on the other, we have the “haters” who can be counted on to find the tiniest imperfection and maginify it. You know what? You’re both just different sides of the same coin. I fail to see the hype, and why so many choose to invest so much of their time, energy, and patience into this retardedly trite and seemingly neverending “battle”. You obviously aren’t going to sway one another’s opinion, and when you incessantly flame each other over the matter, all of you just come across looking like jackasses. Get over yourselves.

  116. Syko says:

    Clover, no. It is not “generally known ppl”. That’s text talk, netspeak, whatever you want to call it – a bastardized, abbreviated form of English which, for some reason, is used by teenagers to communicate everywhere. Yes, you should type out “people”. Because on the internet, you are talking to and with people who may live in any country in the world, whose first language may not be English, and you owe it to them to be as clear in your communication as possible. And typing things like “dint” instead of “didn’t” doesn’t serve to make you look cute, or with it, it makes you look ignorant. You can never err on the side of using good grammar and correct spelling.

    AJ, I refuse to be a different side of the same coin as Kelly or Lola. I’ve stated again and again that I could care less about Brad and Angelina – but I’ll stand up against any vitriol spewed by idiots against anyone. I’ve defended K-Fed and others that I don’t love or hate, I just don’t get the frothing at the mouth with hate thing. Sorry you had to take the time to set up your HTML codes and all, but while I’m getting over myself, why don’t you bite me?

  117. Enonymous says:

    Kaiser, I get offended because you all are ALWAYS the first ones to start the attacks with your rude and unnecessary comments. This is more then if you like or dislike Brad and Angelina (becasue I could not care less about them), it is about for some people to accept other people’s opinion without leading into a war of the words.

    Also, I am not the one who takes all this personally darling, it is all of you and that is were the problem starts. I am just bored with reading the same stuff over and over again. And don’t you dare tell me if I do not like it then I should not come on this thread because everyone has the right to come here and try to enjoy themselves.

    PS. You surely proved Clover right. Clover now I definitely agree with you.

  118. A.J. says:

    Syko, calm down. I wasn’t singling anyone out or attacking anyone, you least of all. You’re one of the people who usually post the most rational, respectful comments, and it was not my intention to get your knickers in a knot. All I’m saying is that the amount of vitriol and utterly scathing comments over varying opinions is ridiculous, and no side is better than the other. I’m pretty ambivalent toward the Jolie-Pitts myself, and simply do not understand the appeal of either absolutely hating them or absolutely adoring them.

    So sorry to have pissed in your Fruit Loops 🙂

  119. clover says:

    sorry syko. didnt know it was english101. and about that “dint” thing, it was a typo 🙂

  120. daisy424 says:

    😆 Syko 😆

    Enonymous; ‘ALWAYS the first…’ Scroll up.

  121. Kaiser says:

    Enon, your hypocritical and sanctimonious comments are a waste of time. Don’t take it so personally “darling”…

  122. clover says:

    and here we have daisy to the rescue!!

  123. Enonymous says:

    Kaiser darling, you have a history of taking everything personally, this is proven by your many, many, MANY comments. So it is like the pot calling the kettle black.

  124. clover says:

    A.J’s comment “Babies are babies. They all look the same to me.
    And no, before some of you pscyhotically-obsessed Brangeloonies jump on the defensive, that’s not an attack on your deities. I’m just saying that when they are so young, it’s hard to differentiate one baby from the other- regardless of whom their parents are.”
    proves just how deffensive you guys can get.

  125. Lori says:

    I agree with hello and ethan. Boycott these media whores. I am happy the money is going to charity but don’t do it at the expense of your children. The only people in this I won’t and can’t hate is the children.

  126. clover says:

    yea,the children are innocent.

  127. Kaiser says:

    @Enon – *shrug* And you have a long comment history of being a sanctimonious c–t. Guess we’ll have to just agree to disagree.

  128. clover says:

    c**t, rlly? classy kaiser.

  129. Nisa says:

    The babies are adorable, of course, and the Jolie-Pitt clan seems nice enough. But after reading through all the responses thus far, it seems pretty clear that KAISER wins the award for the “Most Irrational, Foaming-at-the-Mouth Posts.” Primarily for veering way out of control in response to even the most harmless of objections to Brangie, et al. Congrats!

  130. Mairead says:

    I actually agree with much of what AJ says – but I would like to point out that not all of us lumped into the “loonie” bin are completely in awe of them or are completely uncritical. Personally I quite like Angie, but she wouldn’t be my favourite actress; I never saw the fuss over Brad Pitt and have been known to refer to him as Bland Pitt (yes, even on this site).

    Yes much of what they do has a positive publicity spinoff, but I don’t complain about it because it’s part and parcel of the movie star tag, and all of Hollywood does it to some extent, so it’s a given.

    Anyway, back on a less explosive topic – I would like to get Hello! just to see what the interior of that Chateau is like 😀
    (chateaux, not chateaus, is the plural BTW).

  131. Enonymous says:

    Wow Kaiser, now that you lost the argument, you are turning to name calling? Well, what was I expecting from you anyway, a reasonable and intelligent conversation? Of course not. Thanks for proving me right.

  132. Kolby says:

    Aw, they look adorable – and very healthy! I will feel like a total loser doing it, but I may have to pick up a copy of People to see the rest of the pictures.

  133. Whitey Fisk says:

    My reaction to the cover…

    “How friggin’ cute is that little girl with her new baby sister?”

    I believe that if it had been Zahara in that corner I would have thought:

    “How friggin’ cute is that little girl with her new baby sister?”

    (That’s a cut and copy, by the way.)

    Would the editor of People magazine’s choice to print a blurb about one of the other kids really prove Angelina loves all her children equally?

  134. geronimo says:

    Awww! Thanks for that, Lena.

    These are gorgeous, particularly the slightly messy ones with all the kids piled on the bed, so natural, some really nice shots in there. They all look like they’re having an absolute ball.

  135. A.J. says:

    Thanks for the link, lena. All of the children are absolutely adorable (even though I still think all babies look the same, lol)

    I’m really digging Maddox’s blue mohawk, and I love how Zahara just radiates attitude. So cute.

  136. Enonymous says:

    Looking at this pictures, everyone looks so pretty and sweet. Good luck to them. 😀

  137. vdantev says:

    do i have to type p-e-o-p-l-e, it is generally known ppl=people.

    Yes, you do when you’re talking to me, I expect better from people and despise mental laziness in all its forms. That cutsie-poo 7th grader text-talk gibberish doesn’t cut it. Never will. Just another way for people to dumb it down.

  138. Nan says:

    Thanks Lena. Both babies are above average looking. All of the kids look really happy. Good for them.

  139. kate says:

    cute kids, but why are only the white kids on the cover? actually, why are any of them on the cover? i don’t agree with angie & brad always using their kids as media fodder.

  140. Kevin says:

    Wow!!! Are we still posting up in here? Just had to stick my head in to check on the carnage. Later

  141. daisy424 says:

    An interesting item in the accompanying article;

    “People: Is there any truth to the tabloid reports that the twins were conceived via IVF?

    Angelina: If they had been conceived through IVF, we would have been happy to discuss it. But we have been fortunate never to have had fertility problems.”

    The pictures are much better in person.
    All the children look very happy and content. Brad and Angie are obviously great parents and it shows on the faces of their lovely children.
    I agree Solitary Angel, your “a skunk will still stink, even if it wears a disguise” comment is spot on.

  142. SolitaryAngel says:

    Lena, thanks for the link! Wonderful, lovely pictures.

    I’ve been reading the comments, and I’d like to say that I appreciate a good conversation with people who aren’t afraid to share their opinions just as much as everyone else. That being said, however, I’m a bit surprised at the way some of you in here have been posting; WHY do some of you feel the need to come in here and attack others like this? It’s demeaning, demoralizing, and depressing. I was drawn to this site for the stories, the way the writers are usually even-handed, and because there was an atmosphere of civility, intelligence, and respect from most of the posters. Xia, kaiser, daisy, syko, vdantev, etc. Lately, more and more of you haters are coming in here with your bad attitudes, personal attacks, and idiotic arguments. Those of you who think you can post under different names? You’re not fooling anybody–a skunk will still stink, even if it wears a disguise. I’m sure that, by stating my dissatisfaction with the haters, I’m bringing down a whole load of vitriolic nonsense on my head, but I’m sure the other intelligent, respectful people in here will stand with me.

    And no matter how much any of you may hate Brad and Angelina, not a one of you can look at the faces of those children and NOT see how happy and well-taken care of they are. They are all very lucky to have 2 parents who love them—hell, how many of US can say that? Not me!

  143. Jessie says:


  144. clover says:

    vdantev, still going on and on eh?

  145. countrybabe says:

    Yes, Enon. Look Kaiser. Take a cue from Bodhi and go out and look for a job today. You post every other minute and the the most deranged of the Brangeloonies on this board for attacking people.

    I guess CB doesn’t get much in the way of unique visitors because while there are alot of posts here today. It’s the same few people over and over.

  146. Syko says:

    I suspect that there are a lot of lurkers, not posters, who never respond to anything for fear of being attacked like anyone who possesses rational thought processes does.

    And, AJ? Never fucking tell me to calm down. I am calm.

  147. Kaiser says:

    *smiling beautifically in the presence of the Holy Twins*

    I would rather the Trolls hate on me than on the Brange and their brood.

    Lena, those are lovely pics. Thanks for posting that link. Who knew that Brad in a wifebeater would be heaven?

    And for my money, Zahara is the most beautiful Jolie-Pitt. Love the pic where Shiloh is on top of her, and all you see is legs. So cute, so sisterly.

  148. Scott F. says:

    Yes – the definitive way to prove that people you like shouldn’t be ripped on is to rip on anyone that says something derogatory about them.

    It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to see that the ‘defenders’ have become far more foaming at the mouth than the ‘haters’. Most of the time they don’t even wait for a contrary post before chiming in with their ‘here come the haters’ crap.

    Face it – you crave the arguments just as much as they do. If you didn’t, you would take your own advice and leave it alone if it doesn’t concern you.

    Do you think it’s somehow LESS crazy to defend 2 people that you’ve never met and would most likely never give you the time of day, than it is to attack or criticize them? What does it really matter to you if people don’t like them? What is your obsessive tendency to MAKE people like them? Is it some kind of outgrowth of you trying to convince yourself that they’re worthy of your praise by convincing others?

    Most of you aren’t too bad, but the way you defend those who get personal isn’t helping matters. I don’t like them – but those that foam and froth and act like they ate their children do in fact get just as much disdain from me as those who act like two actors with good public relations people are the second coming. It would be nice if a few of you ‘badettes’ would let people like Kaiser know that they’re not helping your cause by being jerks and immediately launching into insults and attacks at the first sign of a disagreement.

  149. Reality Check says:

    Awwww all the kids looks adorable. Viv looks like shiloh same big lips so cuteeeee.

    As for the haters love to see all of you in pain just because Angelina Jolie have it all.

  150. Anastasia says:

    Scott F: you have to admit, though, it IS kind of crazy for people to say they don’t care about this couple, and then proceed to rant on and on about how much they hate them for 3000 words.

    That’s someone who clearly does care VERY much about them. Enough to put all that time and effort into responding to a couple of freaking baby pictures, LOL!

    I expect everyone who said they are boycotting A & B to stop showing up in the threads about them, EVEN under different names. Put your money where your mouth is.

  151. SolitaryAngel says:

    @ Scott F………….me?

  152. The Old KC says:

    First let me properly frame my comments: I’m not a hater nor a supporter – I’m just an observer. The twins are really cute, and I agree with one of the other posters that the pic on the Hello! cover is more realistic than I had thought it would be. Angie’s face looks unwashed (her nose is a bit shiny) and I expected everything to be airbrushed. It is cool that they let that bit of reality come through. The People cover made me laugh though. Mostly because of the nightgown! Surely the one and only Angelina Jolie does not wear lacy white nightgowns such as that! I would have expected her to be in some sort of black silk thingie or at the very least in a nondescript organic cotton set like what she wore in the Shiloh cover (if my memory serves me correctly it was some kind of tank-top and pajama pants set or something). The lacy nightgown she has on this time just screams “dowdy housewife” and I would never have expected her to wear it…unless…it is a PR mechanism aimed at making her look less movie-star-ish. Anyways, just my 2 cents. Their kids are really cute, including all of the adopted and biological ones.

  153. Scott F. says:

    Boycotting means you’re not going to support their projects financially – they don’t make money from people posting about them on the net.

    I suppose if you don’t support someone or something that you shouldn’t get to talk about it then? Fine – then why don’t you not talk about the people who don’t like them? After all, if you don’t like someone, you should just avoid anything by them or about them right?

    Take your own advice – or stop dispensing it so liberally.

  154. Lauren says:

    I love all the people who say they’ve stopped reading about celebs and how much better they feel for having made the change, etc., etc. Meanwhile, those same holy-saints are on a celeb-gossip website and care enough to post a comment. Nice.

  155. Snowblood says:

    There are FAR more ‘haters’ than ‘defenders’ posting comments in this thread. The haters and vigorously rude & deliberately incendiary comments they’ve been leaving here overwhelmingly out-count those of people like myself or any of us so-called “BADettes,” who would come here to say NICE things about this celebrity couple rather than fill the thread up with mean nasty, ugly, irrational sh*te.

    You’re wrong Scott F. It is the hate which f8cks up these Jolie-Pitt threads. It’s the unbridled borderline-insane jealous hatred, not the happy admiring-fan like & adoration. The hate is the skunk in the room. As ever hatred is…

  156. Anastasia says:

    Scott, do you know how this works?

    If people stop paying attention to a particular celebrity, the celebrity gossip blogs will eventually stop posting about them.

    Demand and supply applies to blogs, too, LOL. Why do you think the paps TAKE the pictures? To frame in their homes? No, to sell to agencies who then use them in magazines and on the internet, which is where more people get their gossip than mags nowdays. (Why pay for it when I can read it on the internet daily? And have you ever noticed the mags are about three to seven days behind in photos? There’s no way they can ever be as fast as the internet.)

    There’s a certain celebrity who will remain unnamed that I don’t even click on links for. I read no stories about this person, I NEVER comment on them, I refuse to even look at magazines with them on their cover, and I certainly don’t go see their movies. I won’t even watch their old movies on random weekend mornings. Nope. No way. That’s how much I want this person to go away forever.

    If people really felt the way they claim to about Angelina and Brad, they’d do the same damn thing. But no, they comment on a thread about them that they are going to boycott them. LOL, how exactly? By paying more attention to them? Not the way it works.

    Lauren, if you’re talking to me, I never once said I don’t partake in any celebrity gossip. Look where I’m posting! LOL. I said I totally ignore CERTAIN celebrities that I wish would just go away forever.

    I love it when people call A&B attention whores and media whores and then do nothing but create drama on their threads. CB is of course going to continue to post A&B threads–look how many damn comments (CLICKS, people) they get! Their advertisers LOVE those clicks. So they’re just keeping the attention going.

  157. Kaiser says:

    @The Old KC – Right? I saw the nightgown and my first thought was “my mother had that same one circa 1988” – my guess is that her boobs are painfully big and milk-filled and it hurts to wear anything tight.

    Anastasia, SolitaryAngel (also known as LOLNARC), Snowblood, bless you. Love love love on this Holy Day. 🙂

  158. Scott F. says:

    “There are FAR more ‘haters’ than ‘defenders’ posting comments in this thread.”

    Snowblood – It’s called higher logic, and I wholeheartedly advise you to start using it. Do you need me to start counting posts again? I think I proved pretty definitively that the ‘haters’ post roughly 1 post for every 6 you guys respond with. Again, who’s obsessed?

    Anastasia – I don’t need a lecture about supply and demand. How about you answer my question? You don’t find it even SLIGHTLY hypocritical that you run around telling people to ignore those they don’t like… then criticize people that don’t agree with you?

    A lot of you just strike me as the kind of fans that are well… creepy. It’s like you’ve invested your personality in their public image, and therefore any attack on them is somehow an attack on you. Why else would you get your panties in a twist EVERY time someone criticizes them?

  159. Snowblood says:

    *sigh* Fine Scott whatever you say. You’re most likely THE most logical, thorough and dispassionate of us all here who post commentary and/or response to commentary and that’s cool I have nothing but respect for you & your voice here. All I’m saying is that hatred and pedantic madness stinks, and happy admiration coupled with the compulsion toward defending what/whom one enjoys or likes is a better way to go through life.

    And this is a lovely celebrity family, with a beautiful brood of babies, and whatever their imperfections may be – and we ALL have imperfections, as we’re all of us human beings – the Jolie-Pitts are interesting beautiful and fun to think about and read about and look at.

  160. bros says:

    oh god shut up scott F. dont you get tired of yourself? what a blowhard. everyone else is so crazy and you are sooo logical and composed. ugh. youre like the annoying hall monitor of the message board. stop trying to moderate and count every fricking thing that goes on and then offer you unbiased, super objective, above it all waste of commentary.

  161. Kaiser says:

    Yeah, I have no problem being called a Brangaloonie. I have no problem admitting that I adore this family and admire AJ & BP’s charitable works 100%. I have no problem defending them against the plague of haters.

    At least I admit to being biased. I’m not in here, hating on AJ and BP (and their kids) day after day under the guise of jaded, cynical ambivalence.

    Now peace on this Holy Day. 🙂

  162. Kristin says:

    Man, a lot of the people in this thread are pathetic. They are just baby photos. How old are some of you? I would guess no older than 13 because who fights like this over something on the internet?

  163. Anni says:

    dynamite comments, really. geez. i can´t believe how low people can get.

    i like the jolie-pits, i like the charity and i really like their kids. that´s all there is to say for me.

  164. Scott F. says:

    Bros – 1/8th of an inch. That’s how far you’d have to move your finger to hit the shift key.

    I will take your sage advice under advisement. But if you didn’t have me to follow around and dig on, what would you do with yourself?

    As long as we’re handing out advice though, let me try my hand at a bit: don’t complain about someone making useless comments by… making a useless comment.

  165. bros says:

    scott f:

    people who do a lot of typing and research for a living dont use the shift key unless they absolutely have to or are in the final stages of drafts for something that will be published.
    people who grew up using computers and the internet do not bother with the shift key unless it will clarify something or needs to be used in a certain context.

    old people use and are concerned about the shift key. 11-29 year olds pretty much dont give a rats ass about the shift key if they are in an informal format such as a message board.
    but thanks for proving my point about being an annoying hall monitor and telling me how to write, even though i have a phd in a writing intensive field.

  166. Scott F. says:

    Wow – could have just said ‘I’m lazy’, which is what that whole deal translates into.

    By the way, I’m in my mid-twenties, and have been building my own personal PCs for myself and my friends since I was 13. I just acknowledge the fact that when people don’t know you (like on the internet), all they have to judge you by is how you ‘speak’. Some of us prefer to ‘speak’ legibly, rather than look like someone who lacks the physical dexterity to hit the shift key.

    If you really are a PHD, that’s pretty sad. Have some respect for yourself and how people perceive you.

  167. daisy424 says:

    See how easy it is to keep posting when someone is attacking you or writes something you disagree with?

    Food for thought……….

  168. A.J. says:

    Why so hostile and condescending, Syko? I thought I was clear that I meant no offense to you, and again I apologize to you or anyone else I may have offended. You are way too apt to jump down my throat to “never fucking tell you to calm down” despite my previously civil rebuttal…almost as if you are looking for a fight. You won’t get one from me, because it’s a waste of time and effort, imo.

    I enjoy reading your posts; they are some of the more intelligent and insightful ones on CB, but if my opinion seems to bother you so much, then perhaps you should not read mine? Just a thought. Again sorry if I seemed to have struck a nerve or what have you. It seems like we both agree that some of the hateful comments on here are ridiculous and uncalled for, so there’s no sense in bickering about it 🙂

  169. bros says:

    great, now youre a child computer genius too, in addition to the rest of your areas of expertise, including history, political science, international relations, government, etc. legible is a loose term and if you go about building your own pcs you ought to have some of the most informal typing methods, as most tech people do.

    happily, I dont base my self-worth on how people view my capitalizing habits online. capitalizing doesnt make comments better or make more sense.

  170. Mairead says:

    bros – you bloody do use the shift key if you do a lot of writing or research… if you’re a geriatric 30-something like me. 😐
    Oh dear… better take my senility tablets. 🙁

    (I’m not being totally serious; just giving you a gentle reminder that 30 comes quicker than you think 😉 )

  171. Scott F. says:

    “happily, I dont base my self-worth on how people view my capitalizing habits online.”

    Sure seems like you care. People who don’t care what others think generally don’t feel the need to defend themselves, now do they?

    And while we’re trying to get things straightened out here; what exactly is this connection between tech and typing like a moron?

    I don’t program – I work with hardware. How does plugging pieces into a motherboard require one to type in shorthand? Building a PC doesn’t mean you write the damn OS.

    Oh, and Daisy, I appreciate your point there – but bros has a long history of trying to call me out, so this is kinda a special circumstance.

  172. daisy424 says:

    Scott 😉

  173. john says:

    They must regret adopting the viet kid and african child..they are never on magazine covers with the Pitt’s anymore..its just the white kids/biological children now.

    Talk about sad, and racist. I knew they only adopted them for the publicity, but in all actually they treat them as props.

    treated as props since are not white.

    typical white people. racism never treads far from that race. it shows in all of thier actions. 👿

  174. Mairead says:


    Lola is going to be SO annoyed when she gets back from holiday or wherever she is to find she’s been out-conspiracy-theoried!

  175. mollination says:

    OH MY GOD…The next time I’m feeling down on myself, or anything in general for that matter, I’m grabbing a REAL cocktail (vs. cyber-drinks as someone mentioned) and reading an Angie-Brad thread. People actually get in comments-fights about shift-keys?? And still think they’re eligible to brag about themselves after engaging in said fights?? Man, and brad thought his HOUSE was a cuckoo’s nest…

  176. anastasiabeaverhausen says:

    LOL, I’m far from being a “brangeloonie” or whatever the term is. I’ve never even seen a single Jolie film and I really only liked Brad in Fight Club because I loved that novel and the film.

    I do think Angelina is quite beautiful, but I’ve never found Brad to be very attractive. He’s not my type. Give me Ewan McGregor ANY day. LOL.

    I’m far from being a big fan. I just think it’s patently silly to pay so much attention to celebrities you claim to not care about.

    Also, I do still think there are weird issues just under the surface with some of these A&B haters. There’s normal celebrity hatred, like what you see with people who comment on Britney or Paris or Lindsey and then there’s obsessed, conspiracy theory, they-did- something-personally-to-ME hatred like you see with A&B.

    Cue the Twilight Zone music. Kelly/Lola is so freaky crazy when it comes to them that it’s gone round around the bend to entertaining.

  177. vdantev says:

    @Scott F

    Bet you can’t respond to this post in less than three paragraphs. Your head will explode if you try.


    Sit at the kiddie table while the adults are talking.

  178. daisy424 says:

    vdantev; She didn’t listen to me when I told her to go play with her Barbies, she needs to sit in the naughty corner for a while.

    Mairead; Lola has been here all along, didn’t you spot the skunks?

  179. Nan says:

    Please, I’m begging you all to keep it in a sparring tone but do not sink to the level of DListed & Just Jared or P.Hilton. Please! I always thought of this place as a respite from all of the losers who are angry at the world who enjoy trashing each other. Remember folks, STYLISH escapism. Keep it sophisticated.

  180. Nan says:

    I’d rather see people write a post as to why they think they are superior to these celebs in some way, not to trash other posters. No? Don’t make me come after you.

  181. Hmm says:

    They look ok, I’ve seen some beautiful babies in the hosp. recently. Knox and Viv aren’t up to par with them.

  182. Ange says:

    These comment boards are getting old. is another site that’s becoming trash due to people like their regular named Renee who never fails to pretend she is the thought police.

  183. Agree with Scott says:

    >>>>>A lot of you just strike me as the kind of fans that are well… creepy. It’s like you’ve invested your personality in their public image, and therefore any attack on them is somehow an attack on you. Why else would you get your panties in a twist EVERY time someone criticizes them? <<<<<

    Exactly!! So many of these people act like they are a part of the Pitt family. It’s rather odd.

    It cracks me up as well about how these odd fans will constantly say “Don’t like it, don’t read it” yet they have no problem reading the posts they disagree with here and picking fights.

  184. Send back Zahara says:

    Is there any way they can send Zahara back? That little brat is so spoiled and horrible. She beats up Shiloh, andwhines and freaks out at the brothers. They dont even bother to fix her hair which is in need of some repair. Well that and shes just not cute.

  185. To Anastasia says:

    Hey Anastasia, you can stop being a sarcastic witch and shut up any time now. You’re not a part of the Jolie-Pitt family, so stop pretending you are with your poor defense.

  186. Melanie says:


    You are a serious a%?hole! They sell pics of their children to calm down the harrassment they would get if they didn’t. Not only that, they donate all money from these pics to CHARITY!!! Do you understand how much these two people have done for countries where children die every few seconds… Stop judging without knowing shit… They are rich, they didn’t have to adopt… They don’t need the fu*&ing money…. I think they are amazing people, amazing parents and we shoudl all aspire to making half the difference they have made in this world… Again, you are an a$%hole!!!

  187. I choose me says:

    Can’t we all just get along. 😆

  188. Asuigeneris1 says:

    I don’t get it?

    I have never see these people looking like they want attention really, seems like most photos are invasive and taken by obnoxious peeping Tom paps…even the kids are typically scowling at the intrusions, especially “Z”.

    ..and what exactly is wrong with selling pics of the babies and donating the money to a good cause, paps would get the pics one way or another anyway.

    …that’s what they do, they stalk them with telescopic lenses and the like.

    They have donated millions to charities just by letting a few shots of the kids be taken…seems like a good idea to me, I would if I had any infamy.

    …and babies are always cute, there is no getting past that.

    I just say congrats to them, just as I would to anyone who expanded their family.

  189. danyell says: are they becoming rich off their children?

    the millions they get for the photos go towards a charity. every single time.
    i dont blame them for wanting the world to see their kids this way…if they didnt the paparazzi would kill someone trying to see them on the streets. and theyre gorgeous. id be proud.

  190. Nan says:

    Oh Ange, that was such a cut. Jib Jab.

  191. Jackster says:

    well I bought a copy of People just to have the pics, and I never buy magazines let alone the glossies. And the pics are fabulous; totally natural. I wouldn’t have missed it for anything. And for those of you with nothing to say except scorn – get a life; who needs more hate, envy and nastiness- I pity your children if you’re lucky to have any and if I had a say in it you’d all be banned from conceiving, you evil-thinking creeps

  192. devilsadvocate says:

    Jackster is a douche 😈

  193. i love to use memory foams because they are soft and they can make impressions ~-~