Sophie Monk is no longer engaged to that sketchy “businessman”

wenn5605391

OH NO!!! People Magazine has just announced that Sophie Monk’s engagement to sketch ball “businessman” Jimmy Esebag is OVER!!! Sophie announced her engagement to Jimmy in January, after the couple had only dated for five months. She even gave an interview where she discussed her love of sugar daddies (sort of) – so what was the problem? Why couldn’t these two crazy kids work it out?

Just six weeks after Sophie Monk shared her engagement news, she’s single again.

The surprise announcement came from Sydney on Sunday. While taping a new episode of Chelsea Lately, Chelsea Handler asked the Aussie model about her recent engagement to “that old guy,” French businessman Jimmy Esebag, 50. Monk, 31, shook her head, saying, ”I’m newly single.”

She even hinted that she might even ”turn Samantha Ronson.”

The news quickly spread from audience members via Twitter.

[From People]

Ugh. Okay, it’s one thing to be a glorified hooker who “dates” for money and attention, and then it’s quite another to get “engaged” to one of your johns and wrap it all up in gooey love talk. And then it’s a fresh level of hell to break it off with the guy and announce that you’re going to “turn Samantha Ronson.” What’s wrong with this chick?!

Oh, well. At least she got to go shopping.

wenn3107283

wenn5605386

Photos courtesy of WENN.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

23 Responses to “Sophie Monk is no longer engaged to that sketchy “businessman””

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Bailey says:

    hah! probably woke up and smelt the coffee! he looks like a an oompalompa!
    maybe the prenuptial agreement wasn’t to her liken.

  2. guesty says:

    Doesn’t he look like he would sell her into slavery or something? Creeper.

  3. Rio says:

    Which means…she’ll start dating Lohan?!

    Given the famewhoriness of them both, that’d be a match made in TMZ heaven and Shawn Holley’s Hell.

  4. moopsie says:

    I wonder if she had give him back all the goods he bought her

  5. djork says:

    John BONER’s skeevier brother.

  6. brin says:

    Gee, they seemed perfect for each other.

  7. Rita says:

    We should have seen this coming. The monicker “Monk-E-se-bag” is not one for the ages.

  8. Jacq says:

    I bet they just woke up one morning, took a look at one another and each got so scared that they both just ran the hell away.

  9. anti says:

    damn, her lips are horrifying.

  10. malachais says:

    Everytime I see him, I think about the elephant on sesame street: http://gigatons.files.wordpress.com/2011/01/20110120-095240.jpg

    @moopsie: you know she won’t!

  11. krissy says:

    @malachais

    hahahaha – I can see the resemblance!

  12. mia girl says:

    I guess the check bounced

  13. TQB says:

    Gross. I mean, sugar daddy it up if that’s all you think of yourself, but not only is she going to sleep with a woman for attention, she can’t even say the word “lesbian.” “Women are hot and I feel drawn to them now” would even be better than the crappy Ronson reference.
    I never thought I’d say this, but ugh, poor Samantha.

  14. hyuch says:

    You know, Sophie Monk used to be adorable, she was funny and down to earth and maybe no einstein but a sweet girl with a long term boyfriend she adored. Then she got famous. Wow. I feel so sorry for her. She needs to go home.

  15. Estella says:

    hyuch, I agree completely. I used to have a pic of Sophie as my screen saver (back when she dated Ryan Seacrest for a hot minute). She was beautiful and seemed relatively sane, albeit a gold digger. What happened to her face?

  16. hyuch says:

    Hollyweird happened to her face. It must be the most unhealthy place on earth if it makes gorgeous girls want to cut themselves open and put plastic in their bodies to feel of worth. Why can’t we have NORMAL looking people in films anyway? I watch argentinian and danish films and they use attractive but NORMAL looking people to act and its so goddam refreshing. I don’t want to see gentic freaks in photoshopped poses. I like real people in diferent shapes and sizes. Thats it, I’m swearing of bloody crap Hollywood rubbish.

  17. Claire says:

    She did used to be cute but she is repulsive now. I see her face and want to weep – she would still have been a gorgeous girl – now she is just another bimbo. She needs to let go of her non-fame and go back to Aussie for good

  18. Faye says:

    Gah! He looks like Creepy MacCreeperton in every single picture. She probably woke up and saw those bright eyes shining out of his bad tan at her from above while he was holding a knife and figured it was time to run.

  19. Steph says:

    this is going to sound HORRIBLE but…
    She’s still young, she should’ve married him and divorce 2/3 years later so it doesn’t look ‘suspicious’ and get a nice chunk of cash!

  20. lachica says:

    dayum, she missed the chance to go after Kelsey Grammer.

  21. GIA says:

    I think she woke up one morning nand smelt burnt oompaloompa!

  22. Ally says:

    @hyuch: Totally agree. Also old movies. Was watching a movie from the late 1930s with Vivien Leigh. She was so gorgeous, and it was nice to know it was her original nose!