Invictus Birmingham CEO: We’d be ‘delighted’ if the Sussexes came for the games

The host-city shortlist for the 2027 Invictus Games was between Washington DC and Birmingham, England. While I’m glad the games are not going to be held in MAGAland, I think hosting the games in England is a huge mistake. Mostly because Invictus gave the games to Birmingham without any guarantees of safety and security for their founder and their founder’s family. Something I learned from watching Netflix’s Heart of Invictus series is that everyone organizing Invictus is hyper-aware of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s draw. Harry and Meghan give Invictus legitimacy and cultural power – they are the ones making Invictus into a globally-recognized brand. I feel strongly that England wanted to host the games just to set up years of bullsh-t around the Sussexes and whether the Windsors would “allow” Meghan to come, and whether Harry would be “given” security. Well, we’re two years away from the games and obviously, it’s already starting.

Prince Harry’s creation of the Invictus Games is heading back to where it all began — and Harry and other members of the royal family will be there to see it. That’s the hope of the woman tasked with organizing the next iteration of the Duke of Sussex’s adaptive sports contest for wounded, injured and sick armed forces members and veterans. Two years to the day before the games are held in Birmingham, U.K., work is well underway and more than $5.5 million in commercial help has been secured. The Duke of Sussex, 40, the creator of the event that started in 2014, will likely be among the crowds.

“We will be delighted if they come over for the year out and for the Games,” Helen Helliwell, CEO of the Invictus Games in Birmingham, tells PEOPLE. “We are so far out it’s impossible for one individual to confirm their plans, but we would be delighted if the Duke were able to come.”

She adds, “I’ve seen the impact. His passion is unsurpassed. He really brings a magical sparkle dust to his interactions, and there is a really special relationship with him and the community. So, we will be super excited to host him in Birmingham as well. He founded it and put on the first Games in 2014. That was his vision that’s been realized, and it’s just grown and grown and grown,” Helliwell continues. “So to have it back in the U.K. for this eighth iteration, I think, is really special. I think it’s going to be a really special moment for the whole country. But particularly, I think a real sense of pride for him in seeing just how far that movement has come.”

Last month, reports said that Prince Harry’s father, King Charles, will be invited. Asked if she hopes the King, as head of the armed forces in the U.K. will be there, Helliwell tells PEOPLE the royal family members are “supporters of the Armed Forces. They’ve been supporters of Invictus since inception in 2014.”

“Again, we’re two years away, and it’s too soon to confirm who’s going to be there. But obviously, we’d be delighted if members of the royal family were able to attend and would very much welcome their presence in a couple of years’ time.”

[From People]

“We will be delighted if they come over for the year out and for the Games.” Oh I’m sure. But where is the security, HELEN? “Oh, we can’t know this far in advance” – as CEO of the Birmingham games, you can’t come out and say that of course Harry and Meghan will have top-notch security guaranteed if they do choose to come, Helen? And Harry is the founder of Invictus, WHY WOULDN’T HE COME? It’s going to be two full years of the most contemptible shenanigans ever over there. These nasty people already ran a long-con on Sentebale, you think Peggington and his merry band of enablers aren’t looking to do something similar with Invictus?


.

Photos courtesy of Cover Images.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

83 Responses to “Invictus Birmingham CEO: We’d be ‘delighted’ if the Sussexes came for the games”

  1. And so the shit begins. It’s going to be a long two years full of shit and shenanigans by you know who. Yes I’m sure Peg is working overtime to see what mud he can fling at Invictus and Harry. I wish the best for Harry to get through this and that he is protected. I don’t know if Meg will go but for sure Harry will!

    • Friendly Crow says:

      I don’t understand. Harry founded the games. He is the entire reason that they exist, he pushed them into existence against the terrible inertia of the royal family and “how things are done”.

      He’s been the host of every single set of games. He’s spent the entire time there, he’s posed for pictures, he’s visited athletes, met with government officials, national officials, has breakfast with teams – like he is the energizer bunny for the games. Plus all of the work he puts in supporting the families, the competitors, the efforts and the organizers for years before the games.

      He has to at least be ON THE BOARD, right? How is it like – “oh we hope he comes! He’s so fun and everyone likes to see him. But oh well!”

      How the actual f does this woman get off speaking about Harry as though he’s a musical guests who usually shows up for one or two nights of entertainment at the games and they hope he can make it again???

      He CREATED these games. They wouldn’t exist without him. They wouldn’t be growing without him.

      How dare the board hold it in England when his security is not at all assured? I mean- I can see Harry liking the full circle moment of returning to where it all began, but not without security and not without Meghan.

      Even if something was guaranteed regarding his security, it still feels like a slap in the face that it’s being held in the UK.

      What in the hell is going on? Is this why Willie is so off the rails? He sold his soul to take away Sentable and IG from his brother?

      Holding the games in the UK is sketchy. I’m sure the Sussexes have a PLAN. They always do. But man. This must really hurt Harry.

  2. Eurydice says:

    I imagine the security will be the same as if the IG were held in some other country.

  3. Blogger says:

    I don’t mind if Harry misses the Birmingham games. But I’m sure others will feel let down. At this stage, it’s been five years already and the bile hasn’t stopped. It will only worsen for Harry in the lead-up so I won’t be surprised if he misses this iteration, but I think he’ll turn up only to support the strong IG community that protects him.

    That being said, I’d be worried about their vetting process for the volunteers. I’m sure the rats and the Palaces have every intention of appearing there and spoiling things for him. They are relentless. And if IG Birmingham can’t guarantee security, I’d skip it.

    • Megan says:

      They aren’t going to confirm Harry’s attendance until the last minute. They don’t want the crazies to have a long time to plan.

  4. MSJ says:

    ““We will be delighted if they come over for the year out and for the Games,” Helen Helliwell, CEO of the Invictus Games in Birmingham, tells PEOPLE. “We are so far out it’s impossible for one individual to confirm their plans, but we would be delighted if the Duke were able to come.””

    Who is “they” that Helen is talking about here? She went on to state the Duke but initially spoke about “they”. Am I missing something here?

  5. bisynaptic says:

    Is it possible that Birmingham—or any city—can be in the running to host only if it can pledge adequate security for the Sussexes? Maybe security is a given.

    • Spaceap says:

      I’ve always assumed security was part of the deal. It’s bizarre how casually she talks about Harry coming, oh sure we’d like him to! Wtf? He’s the founder you toady

      • Smart&Messy says:

        Right?? Like it was her company’s event that she invited Harry to attend but thinks it’s a long shot. Maybe she’s been instructed not to confirm attandance for security reasons?

      • Debbie says:

        Or maybe, like that “Dr.” lady (who was involved with Jason Knauf in messing up Sentebale) she has connections to the Windsors. She sure is speaking as if Invictus Birmingham is hers, and that Harry is a guest. And, since when does Invictus casually mention how happy they would be if “the royals” drop in to see the games?

    • TQ says:

      I live in Birmingham, UK. The City Council is broke due to lawsuits, mismanagement etc. We are currently having a huge garbage collectors’ strike (over 6 months), closing libraries, etc.. So the City itself will not be in a great financial position to contribute tons to this, I suspect. The UK government will be better equipped for a financial contribution. But the Birmingham infrastructure for the games is here from the Commonwealth Games in 2022.

      And of course Harry will attend! But his very real security concerns about the family make me think Meghan and the kids will stay home.

      I will also plan to attend to support this great event!

      • Betsy says:

        I thought the whole point of the lawsuit was that Harry cannot have armed security in the UK. What city it is doesn’t make any difference. And private guards can’t be armed.

        Something will have to change to get Meghan there.

  6. Spaceap says:

    Sentebale was a tiny organisation. Invictus is a massive global organisation. Pegs can’t do shit. He can twist arms of the UK board members but to what avail? it’s too big. I never get the people saying pegs is going to steal invictus, watch out Harry! Look behind you! It’s weird

  7. Jegede says:

    Don’t do it Meghan!!!!!!!

    Birmingham is currently a hole!!!
    The strikes and unemployment rate has relegated B-ham to beyond bankruptcy.

    Meghan’s presence is only to be a stick to beat her with and also reward the rota rats who are desperately shilling on TikTok and Cameo to pay their rent.

    • HeatherC says:

      The BM (bowel movement media) will run article after article if Megan “dares” to wear anything priced over 10 bucks in such a distressed city. I can write the articles now, eye roll.

    • TQ says:

      As a Birmingham UK resident, let me say this city is not a “hole”. Folks like to criticize as we are a traditionally working class, super racially diverse city. But don’t get it twisted — this is the UK’s second biggest city, and a fabulous city at that! Rich in history and culture, with its share of problems, like any other. Yes, the trash strikes suck, but the city council is broke. Anyhow, Birmingham is lovely and folks should come visit us and be delighted!

      • KIRK says:

        Thanks for the invite to Birmingham. To be fair it’s the only way I’d consider travel to UK after my Suits girl got beat up over there. I’d scrupulously avoid anything that could be construed as tourism attributed to the godless Chuck and Camela tampon show (BRFCo), but I’m still concerned that it would count against me 🙄

      • Eliza says:

        6-month trash strike, broke city. Sounds like the perfect travel destination.

  8. Tuesday says:

    My prediction is that Harry will attend and Meghan will attend virtually. If they are smart and can pull it off, she could organize some receptions for families in a few different countries ahead of the games so that she still has a personal touch.

    • MSJ says:

      Firstly, Meghan is in her Entrepreneurial Era as founder and CEO of As Ever. Her calendar 🗓 will likely not be flexible as it was in the past.

      Secondly, considering the security constraints, it is highly unlikely that Meghan will attend in Birmingham.

      Thirdly, with regards to virtual attendance, the time differences between UK and California will make that a challenge so that is also highly unlikely.

      I think the media shenanigans can effectively be centered around Harry and his family possibly reuniting at the games.

    • MrsCope says:

      That’s where my brain went, too. Harry attend, and he and Meg do some receptions.

  9. Louise177 says:

    Harry will definitely come. Meghan and the children won’t. There’s way tools much hatred for them and they won’t be given extra security.

  10. Anonymous says:

    Why oh why did they give the games to Birmingham?

    • Blithe says:

      Although I’m very disappointed that I won’t be able to look forward to the possibility of local Harry and Meghan sightings, I think they were wise to forego planning to have the Invictus games in DC — at least in the near future. Sigh. Given the final short list, Birmingham is likely the safer and more predictable choice for everyone involved.

      • Friendly Crow says:

        Wasn’t South Korea on the short list?

        Like there were 4 or 5 countries and then suddenly it was the US or the UK and everyone went …. Ummmmm just re-roll. That’s …. Those shouldn’t be the options to choose between.

        I know it was before his security trial and everything but they had to have had an idea about the intensity of the media scrutiny if they had the games in the UK. Why even consider it? Ugh.

    • kirk says:

      According to JJ Chalmers and other UK veterans, Birmingham is the first place they land when coming home – for treatment at Queen Elizabeth Hospital. So they feel warmly towards Birmingham. Sounds like the city is well equipped to handle the Games, and the kind of participants that will attend, all in a fairly contained area – easier for security.

  11. Dainty Daisy says:

    “we would be delighted if the Duke were able to come”.

    Why wouldn’t the Duke of Sussex, the founder of IG not be able to come? Since its inception the Duke of Sussex has always attended the Invictus Games. Is it possible that this lady is pleading with the powers to be? I do not recall hearing a similar statement from the organizers of the IG Whistler Vancouver in 2023.

    • MSJ says:

      I think she was attempting to be evasive knowing how the media twists anything regarding the royals. There’s still 2 years of planning and execution to be done. The focus should be on the participants and benefits of the games and not the royals. However, she does want to keep the media interested in the event to promote so it’s a delicate balance this far out from the event date. 😞

      • sunnyside up says:

        The newspapers will not focus on the participants, I didn’t see a single result from the last lot of games in the British press, People were complaining about the coverage that was all about H & M in the newspapers that were not covering the events and blaming H & M for the lack of coverage, as if Harry were in charge of what the gutter press published.

    • Eurydice says:

      Why would he not – who knows? Anything can happen in the next 2 years. This is the most she can say right now. Whether Harry and Meghan attend is not up to the organizers.

    • BeanieBean says:

      It’s also not as though he just shows up every four years! That man is an integral part of making everything work!! I bet not a year goes by that he’s not doing something IG-related.

  12. twoandahalfcents says:

    Of course Harry is coming. He’s not going to let the BM or his family of origin stop him from serving his military community. The real question is if Meg comes with him. I’m sure that’s a tough decision for them and scenarios are being considered. Her attendance probably won’t be announced in advance for security purposes. But judging by pictures and videos of past Invictus Games, they’ll have security from every single athlete there! Those athletes and fans adore them. Particularly the Nigerian fans – they’ll provide security for Meg themselves!

  13. Random42 says:

    In July 2026 it will be “one year to go.” They are already speculating … of course. They don’t have nothing else to report about.

  14. Dainty Daisy says:

    The Sussex family is still getting some very real threats from derangers /🥜jobs.

    https://feminegra.com/real-threats-to-harry-and-meghan-get-less-coverage-than-old-royal-grudges/

    • KoRAR says:

      God, it’s terrifying!!!!
      And then there’s the children involved, and the stupid bastard refuses to protect them. It’s as if he’s deliberately trying to use them as a shield, and he’s even calling on other countries to do the same. It’s unbelievable that he does and says this publicly, and yet he’s visited and invited by heads of state, while lines of celebrities beg for favors. 🤮

  15. jais says:

    Helliwell tells PEOPLE the royal family members are “supporters of the Armed Forces. They’ve been supporters of Invictus since inception in 2014.” Ummmm. They haven’t said a word about the IG for years and years.

    • sunnyside up says:

      The royals do not support those injured serving their country.

    • IdlesAtCranky says:

      @Jais — Helen Helliwell has had over 20 years in the UK Ministry of Defence, including time at Whitehall — an entire career.

      I leave the likelihood of where her loyalties lie for others to judge for themselves.

  16. Maxine Branch says:

    I wish Harry well and he continues to support the games he foundered. Hope the Spencer’s are able to come to support him

  17. Monika says:

    I am not sure about the present government but the IG coming to Birmingham was strongly supported by the previous Conservative government therefore this is imo an official event and I believe that part of the deal is security.

    however the BM definitely will not shut up the next two years talking about “do they come or don’t they come.”.

  18. sevenblue says:

    I mean, it is probably corporate speak. This person can’t speak for Harry or Meghan for their attendance. There was a clip in their doc where people organizing the event asked about H&M’s attendance in a meeting. I am sure Harry is gonna go, he went to UK for anniversary event too. But, still, nobody can answer yes to that until Harry himself approves of it. It was said that UK allocated a lot of money for the games. Harry created the games for the veterans at the end of the day. The board is supposed to choose the best offer. I don’t see why choosing UK was a mistake. Especially when there are so many uncertainties in USA, border agents harassing people, looking at their social media activity to reject entry to USA, etc, the Invictus foundation made the best choice between the two.

    • Me at home says:

      Yeah, I get the impression Helliwell was asked about Harry, Meghan and Charles. Not that she issued a press release to stir the pot.

    • Friendly Crow says:

      I mean – a statement that more clearly states Harry’s integral importance to the entire organization and its growth and his ongoing continual support being essential and at the heart of the values of the games would have been really on point.

      As opposed to like twirling your hair and going – “omg. Like. I hope he comes! That would be so fun. But I mean. whatever! It’s a long ways away so like who even is planning that far ahead. Jell-O shot?”

      • sevenblue says:

        @Friendly Crow, none of Harry’s foundations speaks like that about him. That is how they speak about other royals in UK to kiss their asses. These foundations are built to be independent. From what I remember, only Travalyst made that kind of statement about Harry, but it was because the tabloids started lying that Harry was getting kicked out from there. So, they came out and refuted it and said how important Harry is to them.

  19. Duch says:

    I’m so confused. Who is the “we” in “we will be delighted”? Isn’t Harry still very much involved in Invictus? I thought he a board member at least if not involved in operations or strategic direction?

    • Eurydice says:

      As I read it, the “we” is the local Birmingham organizing committee. It should work just like any other international athletic event – there is the Invictus Games organization and then there’s the host country organization.

  20. Me at home says:

    Harry probably needs to go, if only to prevent Peg from trying to claim ownership of Invictus. Didn’t Peg claim he was a “cofounder” of Invictus? With no Harry around, Peg could pull all sorts of stunts, like worming his way into spectator boxes with Invictus officials or even getting himself invited to important events and ceremonies. Or Peg could pull the sort of stunt he pulls around COP meetings, i.e., renting a meeting room in a hotel near the official COP hotels and taking a selfie in front of the COP signage. I wouldn’t put anything past Peg.

    That said, I hope Invictus’ management is in sane hands (unlike Sentebale) and its finances are locked up, far away from Peg’s greedy fingers.

    Meg should stay far, far away. Mainly because of security (going to read the Feminegra blog next) and because the hateful rats will pick on every last scarf or pair of earrings she wears. Also because the rats will predictably throw a fit about who’s paying for Harry’s security, and bringing Meghan means more security, so don’t give that to them in return for hateful coverage.

    Also, it looks like People asked this Helliwell person about Harry and Charles, not that she issued a press release. So she probably doesn’t know yet.

  21. tamsin says:

    I would also like to know who the “we” refers to. It sounds patronizing, as if Harry were not the founder, and a huge energy that has been responsible for making it what it is. Perhaps she should have said she hoped the whole family would come, but then that would be acknowledging that Harry’s home country is the only country that doesn’t want to keep him safe.

    • QuiteContrary says:

      Yeah, that “we” annoyed me, too.

      Harry built the IG into a strong, independent organization, but he remains essential to the athletes and IG itself. It’s not just a matter of his “magical sparkle dust.” It’s the heart he’s put into this organization for his fellow combat veterans.

  22. KoRAR says:

    “The royal family …the’ve been supporters of Invictus since its inception in 2014.”
    WHAT!!!? This woman forgot she was appointed to manage the Invictus 27 organization, not as a propaganda mouthpiece for the Royal Family.
    The royal family, led by Charles, disrespects the Games and therefore the veterans, not only by completely ignoring and trivializing them for years, but by actively sabotaging them. It was probably not out of love for the Invictus Games and veterans that Charles organized a garden party, attended by all the royals, on the exact same day and at the same time as the 10th anniversary celebrations of the IG, organized by the British military.

    I don’t like this woman. She’s too fond of the Royal Family…!
    And this – “We’d be ‘delighted’ if the Sussexes came to the Games.” – what is that supposed to mean? I think you forgot it was Harry’s party. He created it and is its ONLY founder and patron.
    The Invictus Games ARE HIS FAMILY, HE’S AT HOME
    HE DOESN’T NEED AN INVITATION.

  23. one of the marys says:

    Where did this information come from? “Invictus gave the games to Birmingham without any guarantees of safety and security for their founder and their founder’s family” Who would know that?

    I didn’t read anything controversial in Helen’s responses. She’s being neutral because two years out anything can happen. I expect Harry to attend and Meghan and the children to not attend. I expect all the royal family to ignore Invictus as they have for years

    • KoRAR says:

      Someone who tells nonsense praising the RF is not neutral, as if the RF had been supporting IG since 2014, all these years, and this is a disgusting lie, because it did exactly the opposite: disregarded, sabotaged, belittled.

      • BeanieBean says:

        Exactly. How did the RF show their support, after 2014, that is? Did they go to the Games, invite the athletes to the palace afterward or beforehand, get a lackey to post something on their socials? Anything?

    • sevenblue says:

      Didn’t the BRF get forced to do an event about Invictus recently to celebrate the veterans? I remember Kate was sulking throughout the event and they had to watch a video celebrating Invictus and Harry as a founder. The BRF is the leader of the military and government. Anyone working in UK will always be kissing their asses. I don’t know why people expect anything different. We saw what they do to people who don’t.

  24. Pebbles says:

    The media there don’t deserve the publicity rush that Meghan would provide that country until they learn to stop the constant daily attacks on her and her brand and incitement of rabid hate from people. Unfortunately that means many many nice people there who love her will miss out on her and her children but it can’t be risked. There are other countries they would be more comfortable in.

    Harry of course will be there and I think if Harry is alone Charles will make a show for the good press. The media is DESPERATE for a reunion picture or some crumbs. Personally I hope if Harry does meet his family it’s kept behind the cameras and not used for Invictus pr.

  25. j.ferber says:

    Why does that seem threatening to me?

  26. Betsy says:

    Guys, the issue isn’t security–the issue is armed security. Gun control is very strict in the UK and only a few highly trained police officers may carry a gun. Private security companies are not armed. H&M&kids need someone with a gun as security, much like the rest of the RF, the PM etc.

    In the US and Canada etc, getting private armed security is no problem.

    • KoRAR says:

      Betsy, the lack of weapons is an obvious problem, but not the most important one. State/police protection also means access to intelligence and potential threats or planned attacks, allowing them to be prevented or kept out of reach. By refusing him this protection, Harry’s beloved father deprives him of access to information about planned attacks on him and his family. And if that weren’t enough, Charles has officially asked other countries not to provide him with protection when he arrives there. It’s as if he were giving instructions to terrorists and a free pass.
      The 14th comment has a link to an article about the threats facing HM. Be sure to read it.
      I always believed Diana had been eliminated, but doubts crept in. It seemed monstrous, and why would anyone be such a monster?
      Now I no longer have those doubts. And those words of Charles’s that if something happened to Harry (read: if we got rid of him), people would accept it. No comment, but I wouldn’t shake hands with that scum.

      • Betsy says:

        Yes, you are completely correct. I tend to be too curt when I comment, but of course guards who are aware of current threats are necessary.

        In conclusion, Charles can just…hopefully get his due eventually. Shit son, shit husband, shit father…..go to hell, Chuckles.

  27. Julie says:

    1) When Birmingham was named, the foundation mentioned that security was a deciding factor — everything from accommodations, events and competitions are happening at one site which facilitate security with less entries. 2) Of course Harry will be there as he is not only the patron but also the face of the IG. I sincerely hope Meghan also attend as she is will loved by the community. Their children will stay home. 3. As for the royals attending, the spokesperson cannot say they don’t want them there. However, in two years, Charles might be dead and his wife banished. The king might be divorced and I doubt he will show up. But, I would really like the Wales’ children attending.

    • Betsy says:

      It would be super cute to see George, Charlotte, Louis, Archie and Lili together. Seems unlikely, though.

      • Tessa says:

        Will left Charlotte home instead of her going with him to that women’s match. His mindset

      • Betsy says:

        TBH, I know it would be nice to see Charlotte cheering on the Lionesses, but also for George? The whole “Wills should take Charlotte to the chick matches while George goes to the imporant man stuff” doesn’t sit well with me.

      • Tessa says:

        Betsy, Charlotte is never seen going one on one to a game with Dad. Dad always talks about how CHarlotte likes Sports and never takes her to the games, with or without George. It seems odd since dads don’t just favor one kid and take that kid to all the games. George could go to the women’s sports too but no matter what, he’s the only one invited to go with Dad to games.

    • Tessa says:

      If the Wales children go and Meghan and the children are forced to stay home it would look really bad. Kate kept the children away from Archie at that polo match

  28. Baby says:

    Why was Birmingham chosen in the first place, I really hate it ! UK doesn’t deserve Harry, they’re too evil towards his family, I pray they both dont turn up!

  29. j.ferber says:

    The Wales children would never show up. William would have to banish them from his sparkling kingdom. Besides, the kids have no agency and will not have a choice. They will not go. Poor Charlotte couldn’t even get to watch women’s tennis with her resentful dad.

  30. Over it says:

    Helen is a liar . The Windsors not since the queen passed have given any support or acknowledgment to the IG . I think and please correct me if I am wrong but the last time was during the Netherlands when I think the queen sent out support. So no Helen , go back and check your facts before speaking lies .

    • sevenblue says:

      They attended to an event celebrating Invictus after QE2. They looked very salty though 😭😂

  31. therese says:

    Not once does she mention the name of the other charismatic member of the team: Meghan. She says it would be great if Harry came. Then she says they. She is also being very diplomatic of the Royals in saying that they are supportive of the military, and have always been supportive of Invictus. No, they haven’t. I hope Harry wasn’t being naive. I’m not happy of the location. I would have rather it have been in DC. I am wondering all sorts of things about Kate, and I wonder if in two years’ time she is finally side-lined, and all sorts of things are blamed on her as an out for William. He can surely see that this hatred of Harry isn’t working for him, and in two years’ time, he could blame their estrangement on Kate somehow, and manage some sort of rapproachment for the games. Charles and Wills are too stupid to see that the shine could also rub off on them.

  32. Is that so? says:

    *“We will be delighted if they come over for the year out and for the Games,” Helen Helliwell, CEO of the Invictus Games in Birmingham, tells PEOPLE. “We are so far out it’s impossible for one individual to confirm their plans, but we would be delighted if the Duke were able to come.”*

    Wow are are working on making Prince Harry looks supercilious to INVICTUS instead of integral.

    If they can they’ll try to lock Prince Harry out of the country and have minor leaguer Peggy Cosplay soldier.

    They went after African Parks–attempt at global erasure
    They went after Sentabale –attempt at international/African erasure
    Now they are after Invictus –UK [I know INVICTUS is international, but this is aimed at the UK. They can’t allow people in the UK to be reminded of the Sussexes good works and international stature.]

  33. Tani S says:

    3 things;
    1) they don’t want Duchess Meghan over there (PERIOD). They just want to demean her and their children in any way possible…
    2) This choice was made with this new CEO ( Rod Owen OBE) & trustee Broad of Invictus fdn… So far they’re trying to play down the shit storm coming their way and I don’t see NO backup from their weak present gov’t…
    3) Then you have the Windsor clan (who IMOP) is willing to do any and everything to destroy P, Harry and all that he created and I hope he prepare for all outcome… Sentebale should have taught him take nothing for granted..

  34. Mayp says:

    I was concerned when the UK ministry of defense pushed out the smaller charity that, from Invictus’ inception, supported the UK team. It could certainly mess then with the UK team and the games in the uk, in birmingham.

    And I’m sorry I just don’t trust the board which, I believe, in it’s entirety is british. Also, it wouldn’t surprise me if Harry did not get protection during the games. After all, charles, through the foreign office, tried to get other countries to not give Harry protection.

    Finally, if Harry does attend will they just be happy that he’s there and not with a prominent role?

    I don’t trust British bootlickers and the minister of defense who championed Invictus and seemed very supportive of Harry is no longer there.

  35. Tara says:

    1. I dont understand Why there is Even a CEO in Place specifically for Birmingham Invictus Games? Is there no Board of Invictus planning and strategizing?
    2. It always was to Happen, that attempt to milk the Story until the Games take Place. That is for sure no surprise to H&M, so I Trust them with this. If they are not bothered, I am not bothered 🙃

  36. Roo says:

    I read her response as more of a “we want him to attend, but the country needs to step up and provide adequate security” type of comment. I didn’t see her as erasing Harry, but rather as putting pressure on the government. I think it’s smart. If they push this message consistently and often, it may embarrass the RF and govt to get their acts together.

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment