Michael Fassbender talks about “really getting off on mutant sex”

wenn3233230

Thankfully, the studio behind X-Men: First Class has realized that January “Deep-Thinking Diamond” Jones alone will not sell their movie, so they’re giving a little something to the ladies by sending out Michael Fassbender to do some publicity rounds. The gracious and lovely Fassdong (yes Kaiser, he still belongs to you, but I’m allowed a few conjugal visits on occasion) has responded in kind by speaking upon all sorts of topics concerning to not only his own character, Erik Lehnsherr/Magneto, but also things that are particularly relative to Professor Charles Xavier/Dr. X (James McAvoy) and Dr. Shaw (Kevin Bacon). Fassdong also takes great care to praise the previous work of Ian McKellen as Magneto while asserting his own decision “to paint a new canvas” with his role, which immediately makes me think of Fassbender rolling around in body paint just like Farrah Fawcett did for Playboy. As you can see, Fassbender posts are a quickly becoming danger to me, so let’s just add an obligatory SPOILER ALERT here and swiftly move onto a titillating overview of the movie’s hot mutant sex as revealed to IGN:

IGN: James McAvoy was talking about Charles and Erik being like Martin Luther King and Malcolm X in their approach to the problem of humans and mutants living side-by-side – would you agree with that?

Fassbender: If that’s what he said, then yeah, I like it. That sounds good. It’s actually a good way to summarise it. But also, I think that Charles is just horny, and just trying to get laid. Throughout the film. He’s like ‘human beings are cool, give them a chance’ because he just wants to have human being sex. He doesn’t want to have mutant sex. Whereas Eric really gets off on mutant sex.

IGN: So is there any romance for Erik in this film?

Fassbender: You know, there are seeds of something there, but once again, he is so driven. He’s blinkered. It’s like, there is Shaw in his sights, and that is all he is really going for.

You know, the Fassdong should never be allowed to speak any derivative of “seed” lest he spontaneously father an entire generation of mutant babies. Wait, where were we again?

IGN: Was there a scene when you got the script that you were particularly excited to shoot?

Fassbender: For sure, but I don’t want to give too much of the story away. There were two scenes. One’s fairly early in the film, when you are introduced to him and he’s on this sort of hunt. He’s on a trail blaze of Nazi killing. He’s trying to tighten the screws to pinpoint where Shaw is.

IGN: Why is he after Shaw?

Fassbender: Shaw had him in these concentration camps and as we know, the Nazis were doing lots of experimentation – all sorts of things, like measuring skull and brain size and running experiments on human beings. So Shaw is trying to unleash this power in him – he’s recognized that he can manipulate metal and so we catch up with Erik on a quest to hunt him down.

IGN: So what should we expect from Kevin Bacon as Shaw?

Fassbender: You’ve got an actor who finds the truth in everything he does and has just a wealth of experience. I don’t know how many – 70-something films that he’s done, you know? It’s great to see that sort of person has survived in the business for so long and is really nice and easy to talk to and just wants to get the job done. Trying to find the truth in the scenes. Because that’s the thing – it is a fantastical world but you want the illusion, the bubble, to remain intact as much as it can. I don’t know if I’m explaining myself very well, but everything in the story is there for a reason. A component is not just there as filler – each thing is there to drive the next thing and interlink to maybe three scenes later. It’s just trying to find those things within a scene… we work through each scene and figure out if there are any weak points or things that we really like and need to accentuate. And with the relationship between Charles and Erik – how do you get the best juices out of that relationship?

[From IGN]

See, there he goes again with “juices.” Quite simply, the Fassdong doesn’t know his own strength, but he does drop the little detail that there might be second and third First Class movies if the first one succeeds with the geek crowd. If that happens, the Fassdong plans on returning (and, quite suggestively, intends on coming in at “ground level”) just to give us another reason beyond James McAvoy to watch this drivel. I’ll be totally honest here in that I never read the X-Men comics and (like a great many others) really disliked the preexisting installments of this franchise. Although, I definitely appreciate that the Fassdong has continued the Nazi-hunting legacy that he previously forged in Inglourious Basterds, and I’ll watch anything that he does. I would even watch him watching paint dry on a wall. So good job, Marvel Studios, for I’m sold!

fass9

fass1

wenn2426646

fass1-2

Photos courtesy of WENN, Entertainment Weekly, NYT.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

18 Responses to “Michael Fassbender talks about “really getting off on mutant sex””

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Tanya says:

    Finally saw Jane Eyre this week… I am now a slave to the Fassdong…

  2. silken_floss says:

    Sorry, he does nothing for me. He seem like a nice guy though

  3. Eve says:

    I always root for the “evil” X-Men, but that Magneto’s helmet is ridiculous (whether is The Fassdong or McKellen who’s wearing it).

  4. Kaiser says:

    In my sexual fantasies, that goddamn helmet is between my thighs.

  5. PrettyTarheel says:

    Bedhead: How did you pry Kaiser’s sticky fingers off any and all things related to Fassdong?

    @Tanya: Was it amazing? I re-read Jane Eyre the other night (and stayed up all night so I could get to the end. Readers, I married him is my favorite line of all time. I’m always sobbing by that point anyways.) and I really can see him as Mr. Rochester.

  6. Chickie Baby says:

    ::Sigh:: I love this man. He’s dreamy.

  7. Tanya says:

    @PrettyTarheel: I personally loved it. I saw it with my mom, who is better versed in other adaptations, and she wasn’t as besotted as I was. But I felt he was perfect in the role – He had the appropriate mixture of menace and vulnerability for Rochester, and there was a delicious building of tension between him and Jane throughout. Plus, the scenery, costumes, sepia toned film – ALL to die for! I haven’t read the book in some time, so, again, I was going in with a detached point of reference. But I got totally lost in the film, and he is just TOO sexy in it! I hope you get the chance to check it out! 🙂

  8. TQB says:

    whaaaa…. I’m sorry, you lost me at the relationship btwn the Fassdong and McAvoy and squeezing juices out of it. Need some air…

  9. Fuck it. . . after this interview, I’m all in.

  10. Eve says:

    In my sexual fantasies, that goddamn helmet is between my thighs.

    LOLOLOLOL! Of course it is, Kaiser. Of course it is — and it (the helmet) sorts of provide a certain privacy for your lady parts while he’s there, right?

  11. Ninjajeje says:

    @ Pretty tarheel – Jane Eyre is my favorite book & I recently got a 1944 print edition with gorgeous engraved wood illustrations at an antique book fair. My favorite line is probably “He made me fall in love with him without even looking at me.” Sigh. Such a wonderful story. I wish more young women would look up to Jane than Bella Swan but I digress, I’ve been bugging my boyfriend to take me to see it. Hopefully next week. 🙂

  12. PrettyTarheel says:

    @Ninjajeje: YES!!!! EXACTLY! I adore Jane, and her commitment to doing the right thing, and I love when she refuses to marry that a$$hole cousin that wants her to go work as a missionary. My problems with Bella Swan as a female role model are too long to list, but I’m going to try:
    1) What kind of a relationship is it when he isolates you, controls you, prevents you from seeing your friends, wants to kill you, abandons you, causes you to lie to your family, etc? We call that abusive where I’m from in TN…and that’s when Daddies get out the guns. While I grasped the story and how Edward wanted the “best” for Bella, I don’t think this is the role model for most teenage girls. Meyers created a justification for every abusive, effed up relationship we see-guys controlling their girlfriends, isolating them…”oh, but he is acting out of love.” Fine, Edward was in love, but most a$$holes just get off on the control.
    2) What are Bella’s ambitions beyond screwing Edward and becoming a vampire? Goals? Life plans? Yeah, sure, she doesn’t need them, since she’s going to live forever in a family that is rich beyond her wildest dreams-but there’s such a thing as divorce. What if Edward got sick of her melancholy a$$ and dropped her off on the side of the road somewhere? Heaven knows I was tempted to do so. What about college? Career? Anything beyond marriage at 18?
    3)I get sick of Bible-thumpers chastising me about how their “love was pure and chaste.” Bullsh&t. Edward might have been chaste, but Bella could not care less. She tried her best to seduce the poor ice-bucket repeatedly. I’m pretty certain God doesn’t approve of trying to convince your husband to sleep with you outside of marriage, even if you’re unsuccessful. So add that to the list of reasons why Bella Swan is the worst literary example for young girls today.
    I would rather raise a Lizzie Bennett, Jane Eyre, even freakin’ Katniss Everdeen than deal with a mopey Bella child.

  13. Cali says:

    I’m really going to need you to STOP posting that damn wet pick of the Fassdong and the one with him sitting in the chair, it tickles my loins damnit!!!

  14. Mairead says:

    Bedhead, Kaiser and I have been over this before. She gets Starey McCauliflower-head Butler and I get the Kerryman 😉

    Christ, that man can talk well. If only the interview had an audio because his voice is fabulous.

  15. Ninjajeje says:

    @ Pretty Tarheel – dude totally. Don’t get me wrong, Twilight is enjoyable for what it is, but I’m troubled by the fact that such young readers are eating it up. It’s not the model for any kind of healthy relationship, & I feel like its a bad example of relationship dynamics. Not to mention that anyone who reads it & expects Edward-esque traits out of their significant other is in for a big surprise.

  16. karena says:

    He’s a butterface but my god he can act.

  17. Bodhi says:

    My God, that picture of him in his undershirt is… forgive me, I can’t come up with a proper adjective at the moment.

    I have no interest in Jane Eyre (just don’t like any of the Bronte sisters, what can I say) but I might have to watch it just for him…

  18. KattyKat says:

    You know how some of you were having a cow about Bradley Cooper being in the Crow; I am having a cow about this guy filling Sir Ian McKellen’s shoes and worse, James “Mr.Tumnus” McAvoy filling the shoes of Patrick Stewart. Wasn’t Kenneth Branagh available? Someone more Shakespearean? Anyone?