Jennifer Aniston and Justin Theroux move in together, wear matching rings

therouxaniston
All of Jennifer Aniston’s past words to kind of clumsily explain her ex husband’s infidelity are coming back to her – “uncool,” “lacking a sensitivity chip,” “pity party,” I think I covered the most popular ones. We’ve heard recently that Aniston’s latest boyfriend, her upcoming costar Justin Theroux, had a longterm girlfriend and that she just moved out of the house they shared last weekend. This wasn’t just a rumor, either, the ex girlfriend’s rep confirmed it, and her mother told the press a few weeks ago that it wasn’t true that Aniston and Theroux were more than friends. So these two moved fast, they did it under the nose of Theroux’s girlfriend of 14 years, and they’re going full throttle to the press. Hence these latest photos of Aniston and Theroux wearing matching gold watches – and matching chunky gold rings on their left ring fingers. (We don’t have access to those pictures, but you can see them here, on Radar. Update! Oh snap, Radar took those photos down, but they do have a new glowing piece on Theroux’s career.) It could be a cheeky nod to the press that they’re together, but it does come off as insensitive, for lack of a better word, to Theroux’s very recent and blindsided ex.

US Weekly has a whole piece on Aniston and Theroux’s romance, and it reads suspiciously like a publicist-planted story. It’s hard to tell, though, because US hasn’t been kind to Aniston in the past and they basically admit that Aniston and Theroux were cheating together, although they downplay it. It could be an attempt to revamp her image as the wronged woman, I have no idea. It’s not like she’s been making smart PR moves lately.

After a brief on-set fling last fall, they reconnected in March. And now? “He’s living at her place in L.A.!” says an insider. “And she’s introducing him as her boyfriend…”

But an Aniston source says friends – including pal Courteney Cox – have no worries about the speedy romance: “They like him, and they like seeing her happy.”

Aniston had her eye on Theroux as soon as she met him in September on the set of Wanderlust in Georgia… She was taken by his sense of humor, says a pal, adding “He’s sweet and funny and so easy to be with.” One thing she ignore? His live-in girlfriend, costume designer Heidi Bivens, 35. “Jen went after him,” a Theroux source says, adding that she set the scene for seduction at her rented lakeside home, hosting intimate parties for the cast. “They drink and play games, and they started hooking up.” However, nervous that word would get out – or perhaps that comparisons to Angelina Jolie would be made – they soon cooled things off.

But by March, after Theroux finally split with Bivens, they reconnected in L.A….

And the whirlwind continues: Conveniently, Aniston just bought not one but two NYC apartments near Theroux’s (she’s combining a $5.9 million pad with an $1.8 million one), and a pal says he’s mulling a stay in L.A. through summer, telling Us, “He really likes Jennifer. He’s like a new man.” As for Aniston? “She’s very hopeful,” says a source. “She’s excited for a fun summer.”

[From US Weekly, print edition, June 27, 2011]

This reads like a PR piece, doesn’t it? Theroux and his girlfriend broke up in March, according to this account, even though the girlfriend’s rep kind-of said that it wasn’t over until last weekend. (It’s hard to tell as their statement is vague, but that’s heavily implied.) It’s all about how much fun they’re having and how happy they are together. They admit that Aniston was cheating, but that’s downplayed and supposedly they didn’t get serious until Theroux broke it off “in March,” but his girlfriend stayed at the house they shared for three more months anyway. Aniston just hooked a guy who is more than happy to trade up to a movie star, but who didn’t cut his longterm girlfriend loose until he was absolutely sure that he had another warm bed to roll into. Douches like that are a dime a dozen, but not to Jen. She needed someone to help her promote her latest films and this guy fit the bill. I’m sure her people convinced her to play it for all it was worth.

Rather than explore this mess any further, I think I’ll back up a little and impart some wisdom that someone told me ages ago about dating people you work with. I think it also applies to Hollywood. “You don’t sh*t where you eat.” With this latest romance, Aniston just got a toilet installed in her kitchen yet she keeps whipping up boxed mac and cheese and expecting the public to eat it.

In the photo above Theroux is shown on 4/26/10. Aniston is shown on 5/5/11. Credit: WENN. In the photo below Theroux is shown on 6/4/11. Credit: Fame

fp_7118658_hanna_premiere_r

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

249 Responses to “Jennifer Aniston and Justin Theroux move in together, wear matching rings”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. LOVE ANGELINA says:

    I don’t know about anyone else but I am super freaking happy for Aniston. I think Justin is the one. They are wearing matching jewelry. Woot!!! We should be celebrating not trying find the most negative thing to say. His EX girlfriend says she just moved out of their old home. She didn’t say he cheated on me with Jen Aniston. I know plenty of people who break up but have to stay together for awhile until they find a new place to live. Its very hard to find a good place to live in New York right? It happened on episode of Sex and the City to Miranda. It can happen in real life.

  2. ouch says:

    homewrecker !

  3. Anne says:

    http://www.radaronline.com/photos/image/132632/2011/06/photos-jennifer-aniston-and-justin-theroux-wear-matching-rings

    Try this link for the ring shots. They’re horrible IMO.

    Shame, shame, shame JA Shaaaaaaaaaaaame!

  4. Bubulle says:

    Ew this guy looks like a douche. She should date a non celeb for a change.

  5. You don't say says:

    I can’t top the comments in the original post, so I won’t even try. Right on!!

  6. Rebecca says:

    “She needed someone to help her promote her latest films and this guy fit the bill.”

    I don’t see how a guy with a long-term live-in girlfriend “fits the bill” at all – it’s terrible publicity for Aniston.

  7. truthSF says:

    This is a fake story planted and perpetuated by CAA and Aniston’s rep Huvane to A: promote wonder lust, a movie with Aniston in a leading role (we all know how terrible Aniston’s movies perform without a bigger leading male co-star) & B: for CAA to help promote it’s latest prodigy Justin, while revamping Ms. A’s dying good girl image.

  8. Quest says:

    Girl is just going downhill fast. Yuck!

  9. brin says:

    This guy is not worth the drama. If it is just the usual “need a guy to promote my movie”(and I don’t know why she does), she could have picked someone better.

  10. lucysaid says:

    Radar online made a big deal out of the ring and watches.. Looks at old pics of justin and he has had that watch for a while, same as the ring on his finger.. They aint new items.
    Aniston watch isn’t a new thing either.. She has had it for a few years now, according to d press wasn’t it a gift from mayer???
    The only new thing seem to be the gold ring she is wearing.. And it looks more like a petiti knuckle duster ring.

  11. mln76 says:

    I hope for her sake this is just a fling for Wanderlust this guy seems much smarter than your average douche. He made sure he got his CAA contract before he officially dumped his GF and moved in not very romantic.

    Here is the pic if anyone is curious
    http://news.maars.net/blog/2011/06/16/jennifer-aniston-justin-theroux-wear-matching-rings-to-show-off-their-love/

  12. someone says:

    I have a hard time believing the media when it comes to Jennifer, they had her living with some other guy a while ago, and come to find out, they had never met..Im just saying, i’ll reserve judgement until I know for sure and all the truth is told…I have a feeling that Justin and his girlfriend may have been over for a while…

  13. nnn says:

    I beleive Theroux is the reason why Jen suddenly get rid of that LA home and move to New York.

    Oh well, good luck with that one. Hope he will last more than a couple of months.

    To Heidi : You’re beautiful and young and i am sure will find someone that will treat you better. My sympathy goes to you. Life goes on !

  14. Ari says:

    This is such bullsh*t I can’t even begin to tell you that the end is NIGH PEOPLE lol

    But seriously, who cares. I am just happy that now all the people who hated on Angie for falling in love with an unhappy man can SHUT UP NOW because Jen did the exact same stinkin thing

  15. lucky says:

    well… i have to say that I find the squinty eye, bore into you soul stare S.E.X.Y. He may look like a douche but in the same way that Colin Farrell does, and if either of them beckoned to me from across the room, well… I think you know…yum.

  16. Trustiva says:

    If these two broke up in March I don’t see the fuss about it. She is no “homewrecker” when the other two were already done three month ago. Why the Jennifer hate?

  17. Gabrielle says:

    Whatever. This guy wasn’t married. He’s fair game.

  18. mln76 says:

    @someone you may have a hard time believing ‘the media’ but there are pics of Justin and his girlfriend at an event as recently as March so…

  19. ouch says:

    @ “trustiva” if it was johnny deep and vanessa paradis what would you say ?

  20. lucysaid says:

    @ truthSF : I don’t think she is the lead for wonderlust. That’s a paul rudd movie, he is the lead actor and he plays her husband in the movie I think.

  21. Lem says:

    I missed the last round but came prepared today with booze, my Lohan collector’s glassware, mini quiches and a cheesecake. Figure we’ll be here awhile. Y’all bring the fruit and the nuts 😉
    Who needs a glass?

  22. lucysaid says:

    I feel for his gf, 14 years is no joke.. I don’t get hollywood and their merry go round relationships.. Nothing shocks me anymore about people in that town.

    They are all capable of being cheaters.. Their excuse is usually that they couldn’t help themselves and they just fall in love. Rolling eyes

  23. sisi says:

    are they so desperate to sell a movie that they have this bullcrap story?!?

    (apparently yes)

  24. Eve says:

    I still think this is a publicity stunt…you know, something to try to change her image from “the wronged woman” to “hot sexy vixen men can’t resist”.

  25. truthSF says:

    @lucysaid:

    Paul is the male lead, and Jennifer is the female lead playing his wife. Justin is the one in the supporting role in this movie.

  26. lisa says:

    Its so funny how a 14 year old relationship is so unworthy all of a sudden. AND I love how people are going to hold judgement until they get proof. YET they pass judgement on others with little to no proof.

    so Justin was fair game because he was not married to his girlfriend of 14 years. Well ladies.. the rule is out. YOUR men are not your men until you are married. So to all the girls and guys that have had someone step out on you..Well you are the silly one. YOU were not cheated on. THEY were FAIR game

    funny how that rule just got made up to keep Jennifer Aniston the “good girl at 42”

    I can’t wait to see all this new found withheld judgement on stories about other celebrities. It seems that some people forget that stance a lot.

    LOL..

  27. Crash2GO2 says:

    Yeah, she’s had that watch for ages. I bought a big gold watch too because I used to think hers looked cool. But I don’t ever wear it, because it’s too clunky and that was 2 years ago. As for the rings, the photo is too blurry to tell if they are ‘matching’. 🙄 Kinda reminds me of the big bruhaha over some matching necklaces that both Jen and Brad were wearing, remember that?

  28. Chloe says:

    So uncool, Jennifer.

  29. grazi says:

    Trustdiva: ITA with you!
    Its not like he was married. He had a gf and nobody is certain if they were really together.In case he was cheating, then it is really a shame.
    Imo, you guys are always trying to find excuses to slam her no matter what.

  30. JJ says:

    sometimes its hard to break up with someone when you have been together that long..

    I hope she finally has a guy that is good for her

  31. MSat says:

    I don’t know if I believe this yet. But having said that: he’s friggin’ hot. It’s about time she started dating a real guy and not some playboy pretty boy douche. Get yours, Jen.

  32. imabrat says:

    But she can’t play America’s sweetheart victim anymore….

  33. Cheyenne says:

    @Eve: Probably. She worked the “wronged woman” for all the mileage she could get out of it and it hasn’t been working for her for a while now, so maybe she decided to switch gears and figured if the “hot sexy vixen” worked for Jolie, it can work for her. The problem is, Aniston is neither hot nor sexy, nor particularly intelligent for that matter, and I’d bet a dollar to a donut hole this guy is using her to advance his career and she’s too dumb to see it.

  34. Mia says:

    Well said, Lisa!

  35. Anne says:

    Thank you Lisa. What a ridiculous thing to say. A GF of 14 years is a wife in all but name.

  36. Chloe says:

    Aaanyhow. What the Jen hen brigade has to admit now is thus:

    a) if what Aniston has done is indeed justifiable (they were “just friends” on the set, his relationship “was already over”), you have to admit that for the last 7 years you’ve been unjustly talking cr*p about Jolie

    b) if it’s not justifiable, you should now judge and bash your “good girl” with the same zeal you’ve been criticizing Jolie.

    Otherwise you’re just hypocrites.
    I am SO enjoying this.

  37. Jen wind says:

    Neither the watches or the rings look like they match to me. They don’t even look like a couple in that picture. They are standing far apart with a lady in between them. Oh well, I guess I will wait for the official announcement before I proclaim them a couple!

  38. nnn says:

    @ 26 Lisa

    You don’t even need to go there Lisa. According some of the Jen fans new rules single people are fair game.

    Well that includes Aniston herself. Wether Theroux and her are living together, wearing same rings, loving, ect, doesn’t matter, he can cheat on her starting of today. So can every man she will date aftewards. Those are the rules, right ?.

    I don’t wish her that but will be the first in line reminding any Jen fan complaining and insulting the man who won’t stay faithful to her.

    She is single, no single man owe her to be committed and stay faithful. FAIR GAME through and through !!

  39. Maritza says:

    Well if it’s true she should do a January Jones and get pregnant quick. I just hope she doesn’t smother him with her neediness.

  40. Susan says:

    He looks super nasty ….I can’t stand her…..they deserve each other

  41. Iggles says:

    @ lisa:

    so Justin was fair game because he was not married to his girlfriend of 14 years. Well ladies.. the rule is out. YOUR men are not your men until you are married. So to all the girls and guys that have had someone step out on you..Well you are the silly one. YOU were not cheated on. THEY were FAIR game

    funny how that rule just got made up to keep Jennifer Aniston the “good girl at 42″

    I agree 100%

    It’s insane that people are finding ways to justify Jen poaching a man who was in a relationship of 14 YEARS yet got up in arms over a marriage of 4 years broken up.

    And these same people argue that marriage is just a piece of paper! Double standard much?

    Seriously, i have no words. I feel sorry for his Ex. Anyone in the path of the might Aniston *must* be smited!

  42. FYI25 says:

    So let me get this straight,
    if I’m in a relationship with a man for 14 years, and we also live together. he can cheat on me, and treat me like crap..because we are not married..

    I dont know why people think marriage is the only thing that mathers..do you know many people get divorced after 1 year of marriage?

  43. P.J. says:

    The watches and rings definitely don’t match, although they are both clunky and gold. All watches are clunky these days!

  44. Thea says:

    I hope they are together. And I hope she is having some hot mind blowing sex. I want them all to be happy and move on and the media to stop spinning the triangle constantly. Everybody is over it. Including the ones involved. Let them live.

  45. P.J. says:

    It’s unlikely that Jennifer would sacrifice her “good girl” public image just to promote one movie. She’s got a whole career to think about. If it turns out that she really did steal this guy away from his girlfriend, it would be a PR disaster of the highest order.

  46. Chloe says:

    @ Thea: “Let them live” – I applaud you.

    Now go back in time and say that to all people who condemned Jolie and Pitt 😀

  47. Runs with Scissors says:

    it’s not the first time she’s done this, this was quietly buried by Huvane about a year ago:
    “A year ago the Friends star was spotted on dates with True Blood actor Christopher Gartin, who had then recently split from one of Jennifer’s closest friends.
    Christopher and his wife Joanne finalised their divorce a month before he was spotted out with Jennifer.
    The Australian wedding planner told Radar Online at the time: ‘Jennifer has been my friend – our friend – for over 10 years… we have known each other a long time.’

    A pal of Joanne added: ‘It’s been difficult for Joanne. It just seems so bizarre to me because Jo and Jen are such good friends…”

  48. albeli says:

    14 freaking years? O_O

    Low & uncool, Jen.

  49. FYI25 says:

    Ive never believed in the good girl image, jennifer tried to portray to the media…

    for years she tried to make it seemed she was the victim..even though she claimed brad never cheated on her..

    but now the tables have turned..
    now shes the homewrecker…and yet people still making excuses for her..

    I think the reason she talk so much crap about brad, is because he moved on so quickly..he always wanted a family, and he got one..so she played the woman scorned..

  50. fabgrrl says:

    Well now…just because the ex-girlfriend was still living in the house doesn’t mean they were together. I think three months is a totally reasonable time to find a new home. Wasn’t it “their” home, anyway? Why should she have to move out immediately? Didn’t Anniston do a movie about this very situation? Maybe the ex wasn’t ready to let go of the relationship, and thought Justin would come back? Maybe she wasn’t ready to tell her family and friends about the breakup?

  51. someone says:

    I saw the pics, they are not even standing next to each other..I don’t know when that was taken, it could have been when they were filming the movie…to all the haters??? how can you slam her when no one even knows for sure if they are even together..and if they are, how long ago did he and his gf break up…hes been in LA for a while, and the gf is in NY…I’ll wait for the facts, thank you very much…and as far as him and his gf being seen together in March..Brad and Jen were seen together , hugging it up and looking happy, a week before she filed for divorce, so it means nothing!!!

  52. Chloe says:

    @fabgrrl

    Maybe the ex wasn’t ready to let go of the relationship, and thought Justin would come back? Maybe she wasn’t ready to tell her family and friends about the breakup?

    I find it amusing that these very words could be used to describe Aniston at a certain point in time.

  53. Juliesunflower says:

    Well, well I am shocked! NOT!

  54. mln76 says:

    @P J…I have my own theory there was a story that Aniston lost a role to Zooey Deschanel because she was considered to old her rep denied it of course(eventhough they haven’t tried to deny any of the cheating rumors) but it could be that Aniston has finally realized that she’s aged out of the rom-com and to spice up her image she wants to be seen as a sexy ‘maneater’.

    http://www.gossipcop.com/jennifer-aniston-you-are-here-zooey-deschanel/

  55. nnn says:

    @ FY125

    I think the reason she talk so much crap about brad, is because he moved on so quickly..he always wanted a family, and he got one..so she played the woman scorned
    —————————
    I personally think that it’s an ego wound, because Brad succeeded where she failed.

    Brad moved on with Jolie. Jen did it with Vince and rumors of an imminent marriage and children went swirling around those two last. It didn’t happened, they broke up while Brad solidifies his relationship and commitment even more by adopting Jolies’ kids and by making a baby.

    Brad succeeded in building a long term successful relationship that seem in line with what he publicly claimed he wanted since Gwyneth. A family and love.

    Jen didn’t succeed in her own public claims wether it as about a family or an Oscar, both of which she claimed.

    Again it’s not about Brad moving, it’s about Brad personal successes since their breakup, including in being happy. And trust me a woman who has been with a man for years knows and senses more than anyone when her ex is totally happy and serene, like maybe he never was with her.

    It’s all about shattered ego than brokken heart.

    That’s what i think.

  56. lisa says:

    @FYI125

    That is what it has always been about. Brad moved on FIRST. If Jennifer had been the one to actually keep a relationship together none of this would have happened. If she had stayed with Vince who she got with before the divorce was final.. but that was ok because she was in pain and deserved to be with someone. Even though NO ONE knows when Brad and Angie’s relationships started. They were photographed on a beach. Not touching and not in bed.. And taking the JENNIFER Fan lines.. just because they were photographed together means nothing..OH wait. that only applies to her.. Even though she was actually photographed st-rattling Vince Vaughn on a balcony. I don’t ever recall a picture of Brad and Angie touching that way until after Shiloh was born. But it was ok for her to sleep with Vince before the divorce was finalized but not Brad/Angie. OK

    These new rules are very confusing. I need to start writing them down to keep this list for future reference. This is going to change the Dating rules for all women and men.

    Jennifer is a trail blazer.

  57. Violet says:

    Justin’s partner of 14 years just moved out of their home days ago, and now Jennifer is moving in?!

    She’s obviously lost her mind. He’s clearly just using her to further his career. Not that I’m sympathetic — as far as I’m concerned, Jen deserves to have her heart broken, considering she got involved with him knowing he would be cheating on the woman he’s been with almost his entire adult life.

    Both of them are just too disgusting for words.

    And best wishes to his ex, who deserves better, waaaaaaaaay better than this loser.

  58. Praise St. Angie! says:

    ahem…I’m not going to comment on the story itself, but I will say this.

    I agree with the brange fans that say if you called Jolie a “man-stealer”, then you should consider Aniston one as well.

    but it goes both ways.

    if you are a brange fan that says “a man cannot be stolen” and “brad left on his own”…can’t the same then be said about this?

    as in, Justin couldn’t have been “stolen”, and that he left on his own?

  59. apsutter says:

    I hate hate hate when these douchey dirt-bags leave their long time girfriends/wives and their excuse is always “It’s been over for a long time.” Which is always news to their SO. Asshole

  60. Jenn says:

    Anniston and her team do not confirm things, they deny them. So, this has been going on for awhile now and no denials yet, which leads me to believe, this is exactly what they want.

  61. karena says:

    “You don’t sh*t where you eat.” is some of the best advice my mom ever gave me along with “don’t sh*t a sh*tter” and “sh*t happens”. Dang, my mom swore a lot didn’t she?

  62. nnn says:

    Justin couldn’t have been “stolen”, and that he left on his own?
    ————————————

    No brange argue about that and agree with you. That’s what i have seen.

    The only think that most of Jolie’ fans point out is not even the supposed ‘cheating part’ is the BLATANT HYPOCRICY showed by many Jen fans over a same act to give immunity and irresponsability to one person when they were the first to refuse to do it for others and will be the first to change the rules again in case this guy dump her for another one…

  63. Chloe says:

    @58

    Precisely. Which is why I’m not really hating on Aniston right now. I mean, it’s awkward, what’s going on, but that’s life.

    I’m just enjoying the inconsistencies in people’s judgment of the same actions.

    Basically, it’s uncool when others do it to me, but it’s totally cool if I do it to others.

  64. Johnny Depp's Girl says:

    If it is true, I hope they are happy

  65. Ken says:

    I’m surprised, really, I am. All that pissin and moanin about the Jolie incident for what? To pass the pity pot to someone else. I’m guessing he lead her to believe it was over with the live/in gf – probably the same lines Pitt used on Jolie…’we haven’t talked in a long time…we’re no longer intimate’ spew. I think Jen (like Jolie) just went with it knowing it wasn’t true. If they claim they didn’t know, it’s a lie. So good for you, Jen – for pushing another women out of the way and swooping in. Here’s hoping your status keeps him around.

  66. FYI25 says:

    @lisa
    I agree with you 100%…theres no proof out there that brad cheated..again the jen fans choose to forget that jennifer herself admit, the marriage was over before brad got with angie.

    notice it was after she saw how happy brad was with the kids and angie, she suddenly became the victim.

    and most people hate angie, because she keeps it real, she doesnt play games with the media, she would rather go feed the hungry in a poor country, then attend an award ceremony..

  67. 4Real says:

    SO EFFING WHAT?! Were there KIDS or VOWS involved?? NO! So I really could care less…no scandal here DAYUM can we let this poor girl get some already?!

    May I remind everyone that Angelina had to adopt 2 more refugees just to get that scarlet letter removed.

  68. FYI25 says:

    i’m not saying lets all blame jennifer for the break up..hell the guy was the one to make a commitment to his ex..

    but at the same time, the same people on here who contanstly bash angie and blame her for the break up of jennifer and brad,

    are the same ones whos giving jennifer praises for helping break up a relationship..

  69. FYI25 says:

    i wonder how many people on here would say so what, if they were the ones who invested 14 years in a relationship, and have some woman eff it up..

  70. Jag says:

    Jen is now an uncool hypocrite, yes?

  71. fabgrrl says:

    @FYI25: “i wonder how many people on here would say so what, if they were the ones who invested 14 years in a relationship, and have some woman eff it up..”

    Well, personally, I would have been out the door if he didn’t put a ring on it after 2-3 years.

  72. Chloe says:

    Yep.

    It’s only bad when Angelina Jolie does it. When JA does it, it’s OKAY. What don’t you people understand!

    It’s as simple as that.
    Leave Britney alone!

  73. mln76 says:

    Of course no one knows the whole story but the people involved in either case, but the hypocrisy is pretty blatant. Aniston’s career is B level without the triangle, she uses that attention as the wronged woman to rally her fan base around her whenever she does movie promotions (‘5 years After Brad’ covers etc). She’s used surrogates in the media to trash her ex(most recently and famously Handler) and his family for years. Now that she’s in a similar situation of course there won’t be as much fan fare because the GF isn’t famous, and doesn’t have much pull in the public arena. People are willing to give her the benefit of the doubt because they like Aniston, just like they trashed Jolie because she’s got a femme fatale aura.

  74. the original bellaluna says:

    I’ve said this before, but I will repeat it here: JA’s “uncool” comment was not about AJ’s falling in love with a married man. It was how she felt reading/hearing AJ’s quote about how she thought it was so wonderful for her children to be able to see the movie where their mom & dad fell in love. (Mr & Mrs Smith, just in case that was glossed over too.) That may not qualify as “uncool” but it definitely qualifies as insensitive.

    Now, I’m leaving, because I don’t like all the drama. And don’t worry – I generally do the same on the Brange threads.

  75. Chloe says:

    Oh dear God, I hope his ex stays mum for a month and then gives an interview. In which she talks, and talks. And cries. And talks. I’m hoping for:

    I’ve never said I don’t wanna get married. I do and I will!

    ***

    That part when she was making him antioxidant smoothies when he was ill on the set? That was really uncool

    ***

    Their friendly dinners and outings when we were still together? I guess there’s a sensitivity chip missing somewhere

    ***

    Followed by a series of naked pictures and screaming at the ocean.

    😀

  76. shay lee says:

    Can’t wait to hear a statement from her people about this one or better yet hear from her in an interview.
    I’ve always like Jen but if she’s become involved with a man already committed to and living with someone else then I just can’t respect her.I’ll say about her what I’ve always said about Angelina/Julia/Camilla/Leann which is that she knowingly put herself in a position to break up his relationship.
    She didn’t “steal” him because people can’t be stolen but she gets tarred and feathered with the same “it’s all about me and the heart wants what it wants” BS
    as the others.
    The fact that Justin’s ex isn’t a celebrity doesn’t make one bit of difference to me.I thought Julia Roberts with her “A Low Vera” t-shirt in reference to her man’s ex was about as low as you could go.I also thought Angelina’s welcoming offer to sit down and talk to Jen was the height of arrogance.Leann’s not having been given the proper tools to break up with her own husband was just plain stupid.
    I’m waiting, just like I did with Julia, Brad,Charles, to hear the whole story or to have confirmation of the rumors we’ve heard.I like to hear what everyone involved has to say before I make up my mind I’m funny that way.

  77. kimm says:

    yes, I am sure JA is sitting there trying to think of ways to make herself look better – she probably reads these posts and laughs her ass off, and then goes to the bank!!!!!!

  78. nnn says:

    @75

    That’s not the truth. The uncool comments referred to a sentence that Jolie said like ‘how she was glad to see him everyday’ when they were on the set of MAMS..

    I think you are mixing up the quotes. If somebody can confirm or infirm it, please do.

  79. Lucky Charm says:

    People, a ring does NOT a commitment make!!! If a couple is together for 14 years, that in itself is a commitment to each other. Some people just aren’t as anxious to be married and don’t mind being with someone without making it legal. And how many marriages end very quickly after the vows are taken anyway?

  80. lisa says:

    @the original bellaluna:

    Aniston’s comments were not about them seeing Mom and Dad on the big screen. It was about Angie’s Vogue interview and then she tagged on that statement. Why wait 2 years to say this.. She herself said she bought that issue and know what was in it. 2 years later she says Uncool.. when this silly fake triangle was dying down. And Angelina if you actually read the quote said that it would be strange for the kids to see their parents fall in love and try to kill each other. SEE.. Jane=Angie/Mom; John=Brad/Dad.. so when their children see the film they will see their MOTHER and FATHER. Not Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie. That is what she meant, and just because it was taken out of context and twisted as all their (especially her statement usually are) does not make that statement insensitive or UNCOOL but a fact. It would be a big deal for their kids to see there parents in a movie. They are children seeing a movie but knowing it is Mommy/Daddy falling in love then trying to kill each other. Children’s view of reality and fantasy is not that of an adult.

    and she waited a week to call the interviewer back with that quote.

    And yes. she has admitted to reading these sites..

    So…

    HEY JEN

  81. Wendy City says:

    If he will cheat with you…he will cheat on you. He WILL do this to her one day. When he does commence the victim act.

  82. kiikii says:

    To all those in the “they weren’t married so he’s fair game” train of thought….

    Not EVERYONE’S sole goal in life is to be married! Especially when you start dating someone at the age of 20!!!!

    Some people DO NOT need the traditional piece of paper and make their own COMMITMENT to each other in their own ways.

    14 years … married, with kids, or not … is A COMMITMENT. End of story.

  83. the original bellaluna says:

    @ lisa – Sorry, punkin’ but I’m not Jen. As to the timing and the why, I don’t know. I wasn’t addressing the timing. I was simply addressing the context of the quote, which has been much ballyhooed and turned into her calling AJ “uncool.”

    kisses – tah! *waves buh-bye*

  84. mln76 says:

    @nnn you are right here is the quote.

    “That stuff about how she couldn’t wait to get to work every day? That was really uncool.”

    http://www.vogue.com/magazine/article/jennifer-aniston-prime-time/

  85. Iggles says:

    FYI25 – I agree. The hypocrisy here smells like stinking fish…

  86. nnn says:

    Like I said, i just hope for Jen that this one is the good one and that she won’t be the one obliged toto leave the home to let her place to another woman a few days later, a woman he will have have had some intimacy while he was with jen since he is single and has that right..

    Bcause if it happens this way, the whole web will scream en mass : FAIR GAME, see ya girl !

  87. photoshop BS says:

    that picture of them together is photoshopped, just look at the different shadows of each person, phantom hand on her waist and a man with white collar torso looking in one direction and some legs in jeans in dirty shoes pointing in 180grade opposite direction.

    but most importantly aniston’s hair has not been so long since few months, with her hair being short just one week ago on red carpet and those after party pics.

    about split after many years being just a girlfriend, to me happened the same, after 7 years and 3 years living together, about 1.5 year me wanting to quit but got talked into staying and i stayed and hoped, then my ex suddenly called it off and the next day he went already dating another woman and he let me live in his place for 3 months till i found new place.

    after he officially told me that we are finished, there was nothing i could say against him dating. of course i was hating on that woman (who knew about our relationship and that we just quit) first, but it was him who moved on immediately while i was hoping all those 3 months that he will come back and felt like a worthless shit without dignity afterwards (self-imposed) *rolleyes*

    my lesson learned? if you feel that the relationship does not work anymore, don’t wait for years with a hope it will be fine again one day, cut your losses and move on. it was my fault that i did not call it off, when i was repeatedly feeling i should have done it

  88. nnn says:

    @ 83

    Thanks mln 76.

    I remembered that very well because i thought at the time what a drama queen and a bad actress she was if of all quotes she will use that one, three years later to fake some kind of a shock.

  89. waq says:

    Chloe:
    June 16th, 2011 at 12:11 pm

    SO EFFING WHAT?! Were there KIDS or VOWS involved?? NO! So I really could care less…no scandal here DAYUM can we let this poor girl get some already?!
    May I remind everyone that Angelina had to adopt 2 more refugees just to get that scarlet letter removed.
    _____________________________________

    LMAO what? So even when Jennifer is being accused of being the homewrecker, she’s just the poor girl trying to get some???

    There weren’t any kids involved in Brad and Jennifer’s relationship either so why was Angelina “branded” anything?

    Brad and Jennifer’s marriage was short compared Justin and Heidi’s 14 year long relationship with each other.

    So if Jennifer interferes in a 14 year relationship where there were no kids involved, she is the poor girl trying to get some?

    But if Angelina and Brad start a relationship and Brad ends his 5 year relationship where there were no kids involved, Angelina gets branded the Scarlett letter and people go on and on about it forever?

    WTF?

  90. nnn says:

    @90 ITA.

    A 5 year old relationship that includes two years in therapy and counselling and two other years spent weeks, months far from each other without any of them finding it weird or symptomatic.

  91. lrm says:

    i have no idea, but th is whole thing has a PR smell to it….I don’t even believe she is dating him. at all.
    Any gossip is good gossip, right?
    It gets people talking and focusing on the people involved, and by extension, their movie….
    The whole thing seems weird, is all….
    anyway, time will tell.

  92. Sloane Wyatt says:

    This guy is a total dick!

    Off topic, I have a real thing with ‘douche’ being used to describe an a hole type guy. I was that girl in high school who yelled out “Thank You” when some young turd called another guy a pussy.

    Water solutions used to clean one’s muffin should practically be considered Holy Water! Bitches, let’s take back our pride in our womanhood.

  93. Runs with Scissors says:

    @mln76:
    “Aniston’s career is B level without the triangle, she uses that attention as the wronged woman to rally her fan base around her whenever she does movie promotions (’5 years After Brad’ covers etc).
    She’s used surrogates in the media to trash her ex(most recently and famously Handler) and his family for years.
    Now that she’s in a similar situation of course there won’t be as much fan fare because the GF isn’t famous”

    This exactly.

  94. Roma says:

    Wow, just wow. Some of these comments are… very strong.

    I’ve said this before but I am a divorced woman and my ex has very much moved on. I have bounced around relationships, have talked about wanting to have kids but I’m putting my career first, etc etc. So according to many of you I’m probably a bitter woman who can’t let go.

    This “relationship” is rather suspect but who knows if they’re even boning.

  95. Chloe says:

    @waq

    Uhm. You’re misattributing the quote. The person you’re aiming at is “4Real”

    Cool down and re-read. And please don’t put someone else’s words in my mouth.

  96. Ell says:

    These comments are so entertaining because most of them have nothing to do with fact and more to do with personal agenda.

  97. luce says:

    You can see the pictures on Popsugar

  98. nan says:

    When is Chelsea Handler going to do her “Homewrecker” bit on this bimbo? Hmmm…that wouldn’t be “cool”. It’s a Pity…party.

  99. thesea says:

    @ Roma – I know, it’s like cave women or something

    Women that talk about “having a man” and “keeping a man” like he is a hunk of meat or some such hunted spoils

  100. lisa says:

    @original bellaluna:

    I was not arguing with you nor accusing you of being JENNIFER

    The last part of my post was fact. She has said she reads the gossip blogs. SO my

    so..hey Jen was for her if by some strange act of faith that she or her PR guy was lurking

    I was not pointing a finger at you.

    And I do find the timing strange

    later..

  101. waq says:

    Chloe
    Chloe:
    June 16th, 2011 at 12:58 pm

    @waq

    Uhm. You’re misattributing the quote. The person you’re aiming at is “4Real”

    Cool down and re-read. And please don’t put someone else’s words in my mouth.

    _____________________________

    My mistake. For the record so everyone knows my comment was addressed to 4Real. I do stand by what I wrote though.

  102. Kate says:

    BTW – HATE Popsugar – Can they get any further up celebrities asses???

  103. Sakyiwaa says:

    “That stuff about how she couldn’t wait to get to work every day? That was really uncool.”
    —————————————

    Was it also “uncool” that she said the same thing about working with Colin Farrell, Clint Eastwood and Johnny Depp?

    If this is true, I hope the triangle goes away now. It amused me but I’m not gonna gloat about this or anything. Aniston can do whatever she wants. Brad is gone from her forever and his life is connected to AJ and their kids forever…

    They all deserve to be happy…

  104. Isa says:

    First of all, the jewelry is ugly.

    This amuses me. To watch all the comments justifying her behavior. Amazing really.

    But, I don’t think that she “stole” him. If she did start hooking up with him in September and he didn’t break up with his girlfriend until March that is cheating. But I guess we’ll never know the “facts.”

    If she wasn’t dating him her rep would very quickly deny this. Anniston likes to get new boyfriends for publicity for her movie but she also doesn’t want to tarnish her good girl image. The silence intrigues me.

  105. Kim123 says:

    As someome mentioned before its fine if JA breaks up a 14 y.o. relationship because they weren’t married. Yet every AJ thread mentions AJ breaking up a relationship between Laura Dern and Billy Bob who also unmarried and had a 3 year relationship 1996-1999.Personally I hope “Jentin” get married then the triangle stories will end.

  106. skibunny says:

    97.Ell:
    June 16th, 2011 at 12:59 pm These comments are so entertaining because most of them have nothing to do with fact and more to do with personal agenda.

    I agree.

  107. Sakyiwaa says:

    @Chloe; i think 4Real just escaped her padded room with bars on the windows and doors… or she could very well be typing from there…

  108. Aurora says:

    Funny how they say Justin and Heidi were broken up in March yet were photographed together April 25th in NYC. From what the gf’s rep said, it doesn’t sound like it was an amicable breakup, so I don’t think they would’ve gone out as just friends.

  109. gamblea says:

    didn’t she do the rings thing years ago with someone else right before a movie came out?

    said this on another post

    Jennroux + matching wedding rings=repeat publicity stunt.

  110. mln76 says:

    @Roma I have no clue what you are like in real life, it doesn’t sound like you are a bitter woman. However you don’t have the influence and media pull that Aniston does. Your indecision about your fertility isn’t media fodder and therefore can’t be used to further your career. If you had that type of influence and used it to trash your ex and his chilluns then yes I’d call that behavior bitter.

  111. jocular says:

    Ugh I know little about this but regards the uncool comment – It doesn’t seem to have been said two weeks after on the phone as the journalist in the article writes “Aniston, still galled, shakes her head in disbelief. “That stuff about how she couldn’t wait to get to work every day? That was really uncool.”
    He saw her shake her head. BTW Its better just to wish them all the best surely? All the recriminations, talk of hypocrisy etc seems like bad karma upon one and all.

  112. Kim says:

    Never will these 2 last. He is looking for an upgrade to advance his career. Jenn is just pathetic & desperate – the fact she went after a man in a relationship. No different than what Brangelina did to her. Her neediness will drive him nuts and he’ll be begging for his ex back.

  113. kira says:

    I looked over Radar and read some juicy stuff.
    Just to get it straight–Theroux was together with Heidi in April (the pics are on JonathanMcMullen.com), seen with Aniston in May, the mother said she spoke to Justin May 24th and he denied it, and now, the girlfriend moved out last weekend.

    Seems like Justin is a two-timer and Heidi got blind-sided. I don’t buy the “they broke up in March” story. Sounds like someone is trying to cover their booty. There’s too many photos of Justin and Heidi out together in April to show that’s BS, and the mother speaking to him kinda confirms that.

    From Radar May 25th:
    “Jen Aniston and Justin Theroux? Not happening. Who says so? The mother of Justin’s gorgeous long-time girlfriend, stylist Heidi Bivens! Marilyn Bivens said Theroux, 39, and Aniston, 42, are just FRIENDS. “It’s not true at all,” Bivens said. “That’s from Justin’s own mouth. He said he was with her at a dinner party with a lot of other people. It’s been just a big, big misunderstanding — and you can take that as the truth.”

    From Radar June 14th:
    “The costume designer’s mom, Marilyn Bivens, has exclusively told Radar that her daughter is “doing fine” despite her high profile and painful split. She said: “Heidi is doing fine and just trying to get on with her life.”

    Theroux, 39, and Aniston, 42, first hooked-up last autumn while they had been filming Wanderlust together; he was last photographed in public with Bivens at The House Of Blues Leaves opening night on Broadway on April 25, 2011. Aniston and her new man went public with a very public display of affection at the MTV Movie Awards bash” early June

  114. anneesezz says:

    How does a story about Jennifer Aniston become a story about Angelina Jolie?

    And what a double standard. When AJ broke up their marriage the crazies said “he must not have been happy” so therefore, he’s fair game.

    Stop with the hypocrisy, please.

  115. esblondie says:

    I am not rationalizing or justifying anyone’s behavior here, but no one can be “stolen”. Period. Jen didn’t have a gun to Justin’s head any more than Angelina had one to Brad’s. If someone is unhappy in a relationship, they leave. Sometimes the leaving is dragged out, and can go on for months – years even. Laziness? Comfort? Who knows why? Sometimes the leaving is easier when the person falls for someone else. This never looks good. Someone always gets hurt. But in any instance, the person did not get “taken” against their will – it’s just that they finally met the person that made them willing to make the break.

    If anything, maybe Jen is finally looking at the Brad and Angelina thing with some understanding.

    I went from a relationship where I was cheated on to a relationship where he was dating someone and chose me. First relationship – I got hurt. This one – someone else did. I feel bad about it. But I do not regret it, because I honestly feel I went through all my b.s. to be with this person. It’s honestly a level of happiness I could wish for everyone to have in their relationships.

    What’s that stupid saying? Oh, yeah – “sometimes you’re the bug, and sometimes you’re the windshield.” It’s a really dumb saying. But you get my drift.

  116. Mary says:

    If I was in her place, I would go for him too.
    I think the situation of Johnny Depp and Vanessa Paradis and also Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie are different, they have kids together, that’s a bigger commitment than marriage.
    I also think that Aniston had reason to be angry with Brad (more than with Angelina), but now honey, you stay away from him!!!

  117. Kim123 says:

    anneseez- You are right there is a double standard one is labeled a evil seductress/ homewrecker. The other is sweet and innocent who was mislead by her BF about by his relationship with his GF

  118. Roma says:

    @mln76: But this is what I’m saying – why is it always assumed that Jennifer is bitter?

    Why must a woman be bitter if she’s single and her ex is happily with someone else?

    There are so many things in my past that I still say “okay, that sucked when it happened” but it doesn’t mean I’m stuck on it. I just cannot stand this thought that Jennifer must be sitting around bemoaning her loss.

    Jennifer pulling a Natalie Portman?? That’s what we should get all up in.

  119. Jaxx says:

    What Jennifer did is the same thing she crucified Angelina for. A fourteen year relationship is no different than a marriage. She went for someone else’s man no matter what she says. I never agreed Angelina stole Brad any more than Jennifer stole this putz. But she doesn’t have any room to open her mouth as she has now done the same thing she’s whined about for years. People fall in love or lust or whatever. Relationships end and begin with someone else. I’m so sick of the attention to the Brange affair, maybe this will finally put a cork in it.

  120. Cheyenne says:

    @anneesezz: Jolie didn’t break up Brad Pitt’s marriage. Brad Pitt broke up his own marriage. A marriage that is happy and healthy (emphasis on happy and healthy) cannot be broken up by anyone. Neither did Aniston break up this relationship; Theroux did. But I think his motives are suspect. Brad and Angie fell in love; I very much doubt this is the case between Theroux and Aniston. I think she’s calling it a romance and he’s calling it something else, and she’s going to end up getting burned all over again. No fool like an old fool.

  121. nnn says:

    Nobody in here is disputing the fact that noone can be stolen or that the relationhip may have been dead beforehand.

    Everyone objective and the Brange fans have been saying that countless of times to the Jen fans that if someone leave you for someone else, then that person had stopped loving you long before that.

    The matter is the blatant hypocricy and sudden changes of rules of the jen fans, embracing that relationship or trying to find excuses when they did the total opposite with another breakup.

    The “Homewrecker”, the “skankelina”, the “hollie”, the “stealing men”, the recurrent ‘at least Jen is classy and hasn’t STOLE anyone’s man” are ALL their creation. We don’t see them using the same expression towards Jen.

    People in here are just reminding them how they use to think differently JUST 48 hours ago about a woman in today’s Jen situation, when they thought that Aniston will never be the other woman, or the next woman, whatever you take it.

    And personally observing all that contortionist mindset, especially the one based on married/non married, indefendable/fair game have forever stripped them from the hollier than though morality card they use adnauseum.

    I will bet my home that if ever this guy cheats on Jen, none of those who said : fair game will abide by their own rules and blame and insult the guy for…playing by their rules.

  122. kira says:

    Popsugar has more photos of them together in New York with the matching rings. Looks like Aniston has new extensions.

    I find it ODD that the girlfriend just moved out of their New York apartment, and Justin and Jen are in New York together? One moves out–another moves in. I guess no one in Hollywood likes downtime between relationships? Can’t let your bed get cold, can you? Kinda sad for Heidi to have it SO in-your-face right away. 🙁

  123. Bee says:

    Hopefully, all the people who’ve been calling Angie a homewrecking ho will shut up now. If this is true their beloved Jen has “stolen” a man. I’ve never believed Brad and Angie had an affair, and even if they did they’ve been happily together for nearly 7 years, so it’s a moot point now. Brad and Angie are happy and who knows what’s going on with Jen and her new boy toy. Jen has played the pity card for too long and now it’s come back to bite her in her perfect a**.

  124. Zzzzzzzzz says:

    Wow, the Jen-apologists keep on coming. So let’s see:

    1.14 years together means next to nothing because they weren’t married.
    2. the douche and the ex-gf might have broken up sometime ago… even though there are pics of them together as recently as March. Meanwhile he and Jen had apparently “connected” on the set way before then.
    3. she must not have known about the gf, he probably misled her.

    Just unbefreakinglievable.

  125. LOVE ANGELINA says:

    This is madness!!!! LOL The Brad and Angelina fans, the Angelina fans, and the Aniston fans will not bend on this matter of what happened 6 years ago. Everyone is gonna stick to their guns. Despite the fact that I feel Jen fans have been cruel and ill informed to Angelina these past 6 years, I really think this issue has gotten to a toxic level.

    Jen Aniston’s love life has nothing to do with Brad and Angelina. All women feel wronged when a man leaves them. Thats just the bare facts, Jen lashed out the way most women do. Now that Jen could be doing the same thing to another woman people feel they need to bring up her Ex and how she reacted during that time. I could be a total beyotch and state the obvious hypocrisy in all this but I truly dislike associating Jen with Brad and Angelina. Now do Jen fans have a problem just talking about Jen in a Jen Aniston post and not bringing up Brad and Angie?

    I do realize as an avid Angelina fan that this is like vindication for us but honestly I believe Brad and Angie had no affair and that if Jen was or is dating a guy in a relationship…thats incredibly wrong but that doesn’t relate to Brad and Angie in any way, shape, or form because like I said…they never had an affair. Jen fans have been spouting BS for the past 6 years and then to try and justify Jen’s possible cheating is sheer hilariousness but I we don’t need to argue with them. They also shouldn’t have to bring up Brad and Angie.

  126. Miss Marie says:

    Gabrielle: Fair game? Really? Because he wasn’t married. Your head is screwed on wrong.
    As for Jennifer Anniston – I used to think the world of her. Now, I find her to be a pathetic creature – all pretty on the outside – but brainless, heartless and emotionally bankrupt.

  127. sassenach says:

    This guy is an asshole and if Jen stays with him then she deserves what she gets. This clown was just seen with Heidi in April and told her mother in May that he and Jen were just friends. Less than a month after he tells her that they are just friends, Heidi is moving out. I feel for Heidi because she has been with him most of her adult life and gets tossed to the side when Jen comes along. This won’t last.

  128. marge says:

    there’s something very disturbing about this guy’s eyebrows….

  129. Mari says:

    @Marie- you took the words right out of my mouth, sister.

  130. mln76 says:

    @Roma I just don’t think you get what makes people angry.
    There have been too many conicidences where Aniston or people with close personal/business ties to Aniston have bashed Angelina and now her kids whenever Aniston has a new project coming out. That’s why some people find it hard to believe she has moved on.

  131. Eva says:

    I’m loving all of this. Jennifer Aniston has always been this way but because of all her PR work in the past people believed she was some wronged woman.

    Hey, maybe the guy loves , maybe he wants to be with her but couldn’t help but make the whole thing messy. Maybe she loves Justin. But um, why feel for Aniston when she went on for five years about her pain? Why bother seeing them as human beings who got together out of love? I could find it in me to do that for anyone I don’t know. But for Jennifer Aniston? No.

  132. Gabrielle says:

    @ Miss: If you live with a guy for 14 years and he refuses to marry you, he is not committed to the relationship.
    I doubt this will work out because he is a non-commital type of guy.
    That being said, I would not be surprised if Brad and Agnie broke-up someday too.
    Further, I don’t understand why Jennifer is forever associated with Brad and Angie. It’s not as though Brad and Jen were the only couple to get divorced in the history of the world.

  133. Rena says:

    People now has the photo, it is real doubters. They were leaving a NYC hotel together yesterday. Why so much ranting about what is real? They are together, he was in a long term committed 14year relationship until quite recently. Facts which have driven some of you over the edge. Deal with it like adults, stop comparisons with other people which are not related, accept what is. No one is perfect and life is what it happens to be.

  134. esblondie says:

    @Gabrielle – look at Kurt Russell and Goldie Hawn. They’ve been together since the dawn of time and have never married. You think he’s not committed to her?

    And this is a famous example; think of all the regular joes in relationships just like this.

  135. Kim123 says:

    How does anybody know that he refused to marry her? Maybe they were one of the millions of couples out there they don’t feel the need to get married.The couples that believe you can be in a committed relationship without getting married. We don’t know. Whatever the case look forward to the “Jen’s Having a Baby” cover next week on OK magazine.

  136. esblondie says:

    Also – I’ve been with my b.f. since January, but I say we’re committed to each other. If some bitch came along and tried to get with him because he’s not married, heads would roll.

  137. Katherine M. says:

    This is so amusing. I say this guy was getting desperate about becoming successful on a higher level especially with friends who were far surpassing his meager career.

    I also say this guy is savvy enough to ride Jennifer’s celebrity and bank for a nice long and profitable ride.

    Poor Jennifer is just desperate enough at this stage to be happy someone she believes is presentable enough wants her.

    And to those denigrating a 14 year domestic relationship all I can say is WHOA! What year are you living in? Fourteen years together without something like kids or a marriage license to force you to stay together is one heck of a commitment in my eyes and in the eyes of most people. This guy is a creep and a user. Jennifer, mark my words. Though maybe she’s at a point where she doesn’t care.

  138. kiikii says:

    @Gabrielle

    If you live with a guy for 14 years and he refuses to marry you, he is not committed to the relationship.

    ——

    How do you know he “refused” to marry her? How do you know it wasn’t her that was not into/need a marriage.

    My parents have been together for over 30 years and are not married. They are into each other, committed, in love, wears rings and refer to each other as husband/wife (and I refer to him as my stepdad) but for them, they just do not need the piece of paper due to past experiences.

    Some people really need to expand their views in life. Wow.

  139. The Truth Fairy says:

    MICHAEL K HAS A NEW NAME FOR JENN: Jennifer Manastealin

  140. Gabrielle says:

    @esblondie:
    I’m not talking about Kurt Russel or about you. I’m talking about this guy. Clearly, he was not that committed to his girlfriend, since he felt no need to marry her and then moved another woman in as she was packing up her stuff. Things like this don’t happen out of the blue. If his girlfriend had been paying attention, she would’ve seen the signs. I’m sure he won’t be a good boyfriend to Jen either. Jen should be experienced enough to know this guy is no good. Like I said, he was fair game, and he still is, for any woman that wants to be with a guy like that.

  141. esblondie says:

    @Gabrielle – agreed. I don’t get why everyone’s calling him a douche; maybe he is but like you said, the girlfriend was obviously turning a blind eye to signs. Or, just taking for granted that nothing would happen…

  142. kira says:

    “Fair game”? The alleged lying and cheating is A-OK as long as there’s no marriage? This 14 yr. relationship is probably 10 times longer than most Hollywood marriages. (And, you don’t what went on in their relationship to say that she should have “seen the signs.” You weren’t living with them. If he had any respect for their time together, he would have broken it off clean before seeing someone else.) And, I remember an incident yrs ago w/Mary Louise Parker and Billy Crudup. Apparently Crudup went to work with Claire Danes and never came home. Too bad Parker was 8 months pregnant with his child. But, they weren’t married, so Parker should have known that it’s all fair game! She should have seen the signs! UGH. That attitude is gross. I don’t think two-timing, lying, sneaking around, cheating, or whatever you want to call it, is EVER ok. Looks like a lot of people are missing their “sensitivity chips” these days. 🙂

  143. Eve says:

    @ Cheyenne (comment # 33):

    I think they’re using each other (he wants to give his acting career a boost and she wants to change her image — in case my conspirancy theory is right).

  144. Gabrielle says:

    @ Kira: I don’t think you understand my point.I’m not saying that women should try to go out with guys who have girlfriends. I’m just saying that the fact that this guy was not married to a girl he’d been with for 14 years coupled with the fact that he cheated on her then moved in with another woman immediately, leads me to believe that he was not that committed to his girlfriend. And I believe there were probably other signs throughout the course of this 14 year relationship that he was an asshole that this girl should’ve dumped long ago.

  145. Cheyenne says:

    Eve: I think they’re using each other
    ===========================================

    Most likely, although I think she’s the one who will end up getting hurt. I think she’s going to take this relationship a lot more seriously than he does. This could make the John Mayer fiasco look like a walk in the park.

  146. kira says:

    No, gabrielle, I got your point just fine. And your “beliefs” are based on nothing more than thin air. Like I said, you’re assuming you know the status of this relationship prior to his dating Aniston. If you look at the actual statements of the people involved, it doesn’t look pretty. The mother said she talked to Justin and he said they were still together, and the whole Aniston thing was all a “big misunderstanding.” And then, three weeks later, the girlfriend is out? Anyways, sounds like the girlfriend was blind-sided. And, you are making excuses and blaming her? She should have “seen the signs”? It’s “fair game”? That’s just cold.

  147. OMSS says:

    LOL! It absolutely hilarious watching people getting their knickers in a twist over the relationship of other people they don’t even know! Read it and take it with a grain of salt! It is so not worth this level of anger.

  148. Whatever says:

    LOL! It absolutely hilarious watching people getting their knickers in a twist over the relationship of other people they don’t even know!
    *******************

    I know, these comments are hysterical! Here it is, if this guy is a douche, then Brad is a douche. If Jen is a homewrecker, then so is Angelina. Can’t have it both ways, sorry. Can we let go of the stupid triangle and all related delusions now?? They are the same. Sometimes shit happens and its sad for the left party. It really is. And that person has every right to their reaction.

    Personally, I think women should not insert themselves into someone else’s marital/long term relationship problems, which it appears both Jen and Angelina have done. But, ultimately the responsibility to respect his partner and commitment lies with the man, so IMO, that makes this dude and Brad responsible for the breakdown of their relationships NOT Angelina or Jen.

  149. Ghostwriter says:

    “don’t shit where you eat….’

    in south Louisiana, we have a similar saying:

    “don’t get your meat where you get your bread.”

    pretty much the same message.

  150. Laura says:

    It is quite amusing, really. They are all jerks (Brad, Angelina, Jennifer, Justin)-can we just leave it at that?

    I mean, you have two women who have involved themselves with men who were not quite out of their relationships (publicly, anyway) and two men who were jerky enough to not want to leave until they had a security blanket (i.e. new women).

    That pretty much sums it up, no?

  151. Thea says:

    They are all adults and in the end it is their business. Just because the eX GF just moved out the past weekend doesnt mean crap. She could have been looking for a place, blah blah or moved on. In fact, on her personal web site she is in Hawaii with Justin and some one else. Just because 2 people are together doesnt always mean they are in love, or whatever. Sometimes it is like a old shoe you dont want to get rid of it is comfortable and then some new shoes come along you have more in common with. I have noticed the majority of men who have had these long term relationships, end up married with a year or so to others. Reason that some do is relationships grow stagnant. Not EX GF fault, or Brad or Jens. People move into different phases of their lives, and want different things. And these people are all adults. And life is a bitch and then you marry one. Brads happy, Jens trying to be happy, Angelina is happy. So let them be.

  152. fizXgirl314 says:

    wow he’s hot… I’ve always taken notice of him in his small roles. He’s very interesting looking. And he’s kind of the artsy, deep type who isn’t so much into the Hollywood scene. I’m surprised she bagged him since she seems so bubble gum… He doesn’t seem like the famewhore type either so I would doubt it’s for publicity. I dunno, being cheated on sucks but I hope everything went down kosher for the ex’s sake…. but I’m happy for Aniston, she kind of deserves a break. Nobody cuts a bitch a slack for being single and in her 40’s… and somehow she is at fault for being cheated on and being sad about it… *shrug*

  153. Thea says:

    And everyone calls him a douche. Maybe he is maybe not. But this guy wrote Ironman2, Zoolander, and lots of other movies, documentaries. So it isnt like he has no talent.

  154. Carolyn says:

    Notice that in all of the boring articles about poor Jen that she never actually strings coherent sentences or paragraphs together? They’re all PR puff pieces. Huvane must be scratching his head as to what angle to make her likeable….she’s just not, no matter what new PR spin he tries. She’s made millions throughout her career (good on her for milking it) however we’re just not that into her. The comments on this site proves it. I couldn’t care less about her hair, man or movies.

  155. kira says:

    @Laura. Yep–sorry to the fans, but I agree.

    I never understood this behavior, because why would you want to be the “rebound”? When people immediately jump from one relationship to another, it often (but not always) says that they can’t stand to be alone, rather than saying, “I really want to be with you.” That’s not exactly flattering for the next person–you’re the bed warmer for a co-dependent. Wouldn’t you rather wait until it’s all wrapped up and clean, and then, you know it’s more genuine? I don’t get it? It’s odd … 😉

  156. MB says:

    Ugh. Can we talk about the BEARD? Jeez, she may as well just hook up with Zach Galifia-whats-his-name. PUKE.

  157. Franny says:

    I don’t know why people say just because he wasn’t married, it makes it okay. He was with his girlfriend for 14 years! That’s longer that most marriages! I think if you are in a committed relationship, where you share a life, it counts just as much as being legally married. I am not really invested in whether or not Jen “stole” him but I don’t think it makes a difference or not if he was married or in a long term committed relationship – both carry they same weight in my eyes

  158. Franny says:

    “Well, personally, I would have been out the door if he didn’t put a ring on it after 2-3 years.”

    I mean…I get wanting a ring but you would leave the man you want to marry if he wasn’t ready to marry? How does that make it sincere?

    I’m probably only taking that personally because I’m in a 3.5 year relationship with a med student…sometimes getting married isn’t the best choice for that part of their life….

  159. Louise says:

    I believe they are having an affair. Jennifer is quick to issue denials for the smallest thing but stays silent on bigger issues. She immediately released a statement that she doesn’t eat babyfood. But when there was minor criticism of using the word retard, she remained silent.

  160. nnn says:

    @ Franny

    Dont worry, you don’t take that personnally, you are just acting normal and are rightfully outraged by the new logic of married versus unmarried, indefendable versus fair game.

    Nobody, not even those who claim unmarried people are now fair game to be cheated on are beginning their love life or are dating saying to the betterhalf : hey we are dating and going out together but you know, until marriage we can all taste the waters and it’s not cheating.

    Can you imagine ?, you are beginning your love life at 15/16 years old and your parents are telling you, hey you can still date left and right even if you have a steady boyfriend, since you are not married.

    Most of us are raised by parents who are setting some moral values of right and wrong and adopting a behaviour of dating left and right or multiple partners at the same times is often deemed irresponsible or show some unstable nature by most people.

    It’s just that today, some people are unable to apply the same adjective to one specific person when they had no problems to do it to another one to describe her role in a same situation.

    So they resort to setting other rules to give impunity to something they used to find immoral 2 days ago.

    The duty of hypocricy to exonerate from what they use to consider a sin the person they would have called out if she didn’t call herself jennifer Aniston.

  161. Lucky Charm says:

    Ok, here’s my take on why this is not the same as the Brad/Jen marriage:

    BP & JA’s marriage was over and they were each doing their own thing. Being the decent gentleman that he is, he wasn’t going to be the one to file for divorce and make her look bad. He meets AJ. She’s smart, funny, beautiful, a mom, a successful actress and a humanitarian. She has a lot on her plate that she manages well. She has a lot of varied interests, beyond sunbathing on the beach in Cabo, and they have many shared things in common. BP realizes that this is the type of person he needs to be with and tells his wife, so that she will hurry up and file for divorce. They go on vacation with CC and DA, probably to tell them it’s over, and as soon as they get back their separation is announced. BP moves out and is not seen together with AJ (outside of work promotional events) for several months, not until AFTER JA files for divorce.
    1. BP told JA he wanted out.
    2. They officially split up.
    3. JA files for divorce.
    4. BP and AJ are seen together privately (not work related).

    JT is living with HB and meets JA. He starts going out with JA while his girlfriend is still very much in the picture and still living with him. He tells her mother they are still together, nothing going on with JA, meanwhile JA is introducing him as her boyfriend. HB sees all of this in the media and realizes that she’s being two-timed. She moves out of their house two weeks after he stated that they were still together and nothing was going on with JA.
    1. JT did not tell HB that he wanted out.
    2. They did not officially break up.
    3. JT is publicly seen with both JA and HB at the same time. He wants to have his cake and eat it, too.
    4. HB moves out.

    Biggest difference: BP ended his relationship with JA first and then started dating AJ. Meanwhile, JT was still in a relationship with HB when he started dating JA.

  162. REALIST says:

    Jen-not taking a lot of time for reflection with this move. Whatever. I would be delighted to have her “off the market” so we could at last stop hearing her tale of woe about how Brad dumped her for Angelina-how long ago was that?
    Yeah, move on girlfriend-whether the guy is a douchebag or not is your call.

  163. laugh says:

    WATER COOLER JOKE IF YOU WANT TO SPEND ONE NIGHT IN JENNIFER COSTAR IN A MOVIE WITH HER.

  164. Whatever says:

    BP & JA’s marriage was over and they were each doing their own thing.
    **********

    This is simply wrong and the Brangeloonies need to let that one go. He was happy enough and then he met Angelina and fell in love. So he left his wife. Whether or not they had sex before he officially moved out, he left for Angelina. I like all three of the non triangle, but facts are facts. The problem with Jenloonies and Brangeloonies is that both sides stubbornly refuse to see reality.

    My mom gives me her old Oprah magazines and I remember reading an interview with Jen given right before they split. She was in love with him. I remember reading that interview and feeling sad for her. She had no idea what was coming and I believe she was completely blindsided and banged Vaughn out of revenge/angry sex. Also happens all the time. There was no evidence that Brad wasn’t happy before he met Angelina. However, there were always stories about Brad visiting Jen on set and he appeared happy, spoke lovingly of her in interviews, hugged her on the red carpet, etc. Then he met Angelina and fell in love at first sight. It’s sad, but it happens every day to non famous women.

    Is he an ass? No, shit happens and it was sad for Jen, just like its sad for this guy’s ex. I’m not a fan of hopping right to the next person without taking a little time to reflect/evaluate/breathe before moving on, but its better to leave than to cheat. The situations are almost identical. Everyone hates Jen because she had a bad reaction to her husband falling in love with another women. That is stupid. Everyone reacts differently and losing her husband and future they had planned is like a death. She has the right to that reaction, just like this guy’s ex has a right to her statements. Jen will have to take her lumps for being a part of the breakup of a relationship, just like Angelina had to take hers.

  165. Snicker says:

    A whore is a whore is a whore, this brainless bitch a couple years ago accused brad of missing a sensitivity chip when he spoke about his and angie’s relationship how much sensitivity chip are you missing? what’s the difference between what he did and what you did? Stupid brainless HYPOCRITE!!!!!

  166. Cheyenne says:

    Whatever: There was no evidence that Brad wasn’t happy before he met Angelina.
    =============================================

    There isn’t? How happy is anyone in a marriage where they start counseling only months after the wedding and continue counseling for two years? How happy do you think he felt having his wife shoot him down in public telling him to his face he’d be lucky to get one or two children rather than the large family he was hoping for? I don’t think Brad was happy at all for at least the last three years of his marriage; I think he was resigned and felt he might as well try to stick it out and make the best of it. Then he met Angie and the rest is history.

  167. Cheyenne says:

    Franny: I don’t know why people say just because he wasn’t married, it makes it okay. He was with his girlfriend for 14 years!
    =============================================

    Totally agree, and the same people who are making this lameass excuse would never say that if it was Johnny Depp and Vanessa Paradis, who have been happily together for ages. Or Kurt Russell and Goldie Hawn, who have been together in unwedded bliss for over 20 years. But when it involves Aniston, somehow that makes it okay. The hypocrisy reeks.

  168. fizXgirl314 says:

    ok some of you people really do need to get a life though :-/

  169. nnn says:

    I think people who say there were no evidence about the ‘mood’ of Brad and Jen are either delusional either struck with selective memory.

    1) That marriage began with two years in which Pitt didn’t work and was in therapy. This was the alarm by excellence.

    2) As soon as that marriage began, there were rumours in the media each week passing saying that they are on the verge of breaking up when it wasn’t about babies. It was constant.

    3) The way they spoke about each other publicly is telling. I am sorry but a wife cannot publicly say that ‘her husband is not the love of her life but one love in her life” without raising eyebrows. It’s like she was already consious that that marriage had a time limite. Similarily, a husband cannot spoke about his marriage saying that it’s a merger and that both him and his wife will go on till it end it’s course or something approximativelly. That’s disrespectful and both are to blame for speaking so lightly about the institution that some see as a love guarantee.

    4) After that 2 first years of therapy, you cannot pretend that things are going better when you decided to both work aways from each other for months and publicly say how relief you are that your husband is finally away so that you can redecorate the room without never expressing the thought to join him, au contraire admitting that even if you didn’t see him for months he doesn’t miss you and you won’t take the plane cause you are afraid of flying eventhoough you already have flown. It’s just show that you are not keen enough in making things work.

    Look at Pink and Carrey,they had counselling and made sure to spend time together. Pitt and Aniston had counselling,¨Pitt of all people, someone who is known as zen was in therapy and after that therapy you both move away from each other physically ? it’s symptomatic. And again, I rememberred clearly the media predicting a break up as soon as they married each and every weak.

    The fact is Jen and Pitt marriage is the one wherte i have never seen so called husband and wife talking about the institution or their better half like they didn’t care, like they were convinced from the get go that it was a punctual situation and not a permanent commintment.

    I personally am shocked that both jen and Pitt could publicly use those quotes (merger, not the love of my life) to describe their own relationship. It’s insane.

  170. Whatever says:

    There isn’t? How happy is anyone in a marriage where they start counseling only months after the wedding and continue counseling for two years? How happy do you think he felt having his wife shoot him down in public telling him to his face he’d be lucky to get one or two children rather than the large family he was hoping for? I don’t think Brad was happy at all for at least the last three years of his marriage; I think he was resigned and felt he might as well try to stick it out and make the best of it. Then he met Angie and the rest is history.

    *****************

    That is not what I ever heard or read in interviews at the time from Brad. I’ve thought that was justification after the fact, at best. If what you say is true, then my opinion of Brad will dramatically change, since you are basically saying he is a pathetic douche who hangs on until something better comes along. Never saw him as that weak or pathetic. Its funny crap when Brad fans try to defend him and make him sound worse!

  171. Banshee74 says:

    Yawn…why is Jennifer Aniston still in the news? She is so irrelevant.I’m sick of her face.

  172. Chloe says:

    So, like I said before, Jen hens basically have two options now:

    a) vilify Jennifer Aniston like they have vilified Jolie for the last 7 years

    b) admit that since “people can’t be stolen” – as they are suddenly so eager to agree – they’ve been lashing out unjustly at Jolie and Pitt.

    Regardless of how much detail we analyze here, or how many muddy arguments, chronologies, pictures and matching socks (or rings) are brought up, the result is as simple as that: either Jen fans have been in the wrong for the last years and it’s time to admit it and backpedal, or your good girl Jen is doing the wrong thing now and deserves your utter contempt.

    You talked the talk, now walk the walk. 🙂

  173. kira says:

    On ABC news:
    —————————————-
    Aniston’s rep had even less to say about the report.

    “We try not to respond to the endless rumors that appear in gossip columns and tabloids,” her spokesman said in an e-mail to ABCNews.com.”

    http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/jennifer-aniston-homewrecker/story?id=13839036

    ——————————–

    Major eyeroll–somehow her REP responds to questions about Aniston’s dog, her eating baby food as diet food, but not this? Really? The silence is telling.

    My guess is he’s figuring out how big this will get before he comes out with a strategy. The girlfriend isn’t famous, and maybe, he’s hoping people will lose interest in a few days?

  174. Cheyenne says:

    @nnn: If my spouse referred to our marriage as a “merger” in a public interview, I’d be out of there before he knew which end was up.

    @Chloe: How can you tell them to walk the walk when they don’t have a leg to stand on? 🙂

  175. Reality says:

    So, like I said before, loons basically have two options now:

    a) defend Jennifer Aniston like they have defended Jolie for the last 7 years

    b) admit that since “people can’t be stolen” – as they’ve been screaming all along – they’re just lashing out unjustly at Aniston.

    See it works both ways? I don’t think I’ve ever called Jolie a home-wrecker, but if the shoe fits, then it fits for both of them, and only one of them was married. How people can call others out for hypocrisy and not see that they’re doing the same thing is mind-boggling. You can’t have it both ways. Just because Aniston hooked up with a taken man (allegedly) does not make Jolie’s actions any better. They are both (allegedly) wrong.

    If a 14 year relationship is like a marriage, then what’s the point of the institution really? When you make vows before God (better or worse, til death do us part, sickness and health) it’s more serious, or why would people even bother. Not to belittle Justin and Heidi’s relationship, obviously you don’t go after a man who isn’t single (if that’s what happened), but it’s not the same.

    P.S. the same rumours of an imminent break up could be said of Jolie and Pitt. And I love how people bring up marriage counseling like it’s the death knell of a marriage. Nobody knows what happens behind closed doors, so it’s all just idle speculation, and some of you take idle speculation too seriously.

  176. Josephina says:

    Whatever-

    Jen’s hurt feelings of her breakup over Brad and the divorce were natural. Jen’s intentional hate parade that has lasted OVER 7 YEARS is neurotic, pathological and unhealthy.

    And what exactly, did her fan base do to help her dilemma? They fanned the flames just like she did! The problem is that she is the only one getting burned.

    During the year of 2004, Brad did not see much of Jennifer due to his filming. During 2003, Brad did not see much of Jennifer due to his filming. When he filmed Troy, they were apart at least 6 months out of the year. Today Brad is still filming. Today Brad and Angelina do not go longer than 3-4 days without visiting each other on the set. Today, if either of them is filming, the other is at home with the kids. They travel EVERYWHERE together. Their actions demonstrate that they are committed to each other. ANd they do all of this togetherness with six children!!!

    See the difference? They do not insult each other in public ( Aniston publicly corrected the interviewer when he assumed Brad was the “love of her life” -it is on YouTube.) Brad and Angie do not belittle their union (Brad called his marriage a “merger” while married to Jen and a “deadend” once he was divorced.)

    So…why the hell was she pining over a man that really was not that into her, even when he was married to her? TMI. The public should have just known that there was a divorce. Then Aniston began talking…and crying…and bitching.

    Why did Aniston let the whole world KNOW how much Brad did not want her? The more she talked, the more came out about the marriage, and none of it was positive. All of the information that she supplied to the media made her look delusional…every time.

    My opinion? Neither ONE OF THEM, Brad and Jen, valued their marriage enough to make it work. It takes two to make it, and it takes two to break it. Brad was just far, far more ready to move on, and did so.

    That she played out her pain, for years…IN THE MEDIA…was immature and stupid. Spare the public, and keep it to your friends and family! Isn’t that what friends are for? Stop vomiting to the media.

  177. My German blood is reveling in this delicious, hypocritical schadenfreude. Mostly on the part of the “pity party” apologists.

    I mean, come on! The only way to signify a commitment is through a ring and a state-certified piece of paper? Methinks some of you aren’t critical thinkers. . .

    Got to hand it to her, though – the woman knows what she has to do to stay relevant. She’s been coasting on her love life as media-fodder for the past six years. If it wasn’t for her shrewd PR, she’d have faded into obscurity after Friends – doG knows she has no natural born talent.

  178. Cheyenne says:

    kira: “We try not to respond to the endless rumors that appear in gossip columns and tabloids,” her spokesman said in an e-mail to ABCNews.com.”
    ============================================

    ROFL!! That’s hilarious. They’re bitching about the endless rumors? They CREATE the endless rumors. Now they are trying to deal with the fallout when this one they didn’t create blew up in their faces.

  179. Chloe says:

    @ Reality

    Precisely. I do find it very ironic that we find things to be okay when we do them to other people, and condemn the same things when they are done to us.

    For the record, I’ve never said that you have ever called Jolie a home wrecker, so don’t take it personally.

    But I don’t think anyone sane can deny the fact that Aniston milked the post-divorce situation to an unprecedented degree, turning it into a brand, which is sort of cynical. JA’s people, probably with her approval – I’d say silent, except she was sort of vocal throughout, actively encouraged a smear campaign against Jolie and Pitt, though mostly at Jolie, eagerly followed by several media outlets and many of her fans.

    So right now she should be prepared to get the same end of the stick she’s been giving to another person. Judge not lest ye be judged and all that.

    Also, I thoroughly enjoy the irony of it all.

  180. Franny says:

    Reality- for a lot of people, marriage isn’t about making a vow before God, its about making a commitment to each other. Some people have a commitment to each other without having to have a marriage. I assume that if they were together for 14 years, they probably weren’t planning on getting married, and probably weren’t going to at that point. Why? We don’t know…but it seems that they didn’t need a marriage to make it real…until it ended (for whatever reason). So…standing in front of 200 of your closest friends to say I love you and am committed, or if you live like that day in and day out…its a committed relationship that doesn’t deserve to be called not as real as a marriage.

    The more I think about this, the more angry I’m getting at all you bitches who claim that. Like I mentioned above, I’ve been with my boyfriend for 3.5 years, we live together, we have dogs together…we have a life together. Then I know a girl who got engaged to her boyfriend after 4 months of dating, while living 2 hours apart and seeing each other only 24 hours a week. Are you saying that because she will be married by the summer, her relationship means more than mine because they rushed to the alter during the “new happy fun new” phase of a relationship instead of actually getting to know each other first? Bullshit. Being in a relationship means being committed…an expensive ring and pretty white dress doesn’t mean one is more important than the other.

  181. kasper says:

    @ Sakyiwaa. Once again, to quote that comedy not so great, Martin Lawrence, “You So Crazy”.

  182. Chloe says:

    By the way, I can’t wait to see how her PR people are going to turn it around. My prediction is, she and JT will lie low for some time, and then flood the starved media with details of their bliss and commitment and lots of cool couple-y photos, hoping that everyone forgets the self-created image of Jen the poor girl and her years of public “moving on,” healing, crying, and screaming at the ocean.

    Which, considering how idiotic the majority of gossip media is, might actually happen.

  183. Sue says:

    I don’t have time to read over 180 posts (only Jen can bring this many posts)- and it will be the same thing was usual. But I am loving this new Jen. Man stealing – no more pity parties I guess. I think this may actually change things in the tabloids – instead of Jen being unlucky in love now she is a man stealing woman. Got to love it!

  184. lisa says:

    Hey when Jennifer and this guy make it to 6+ years..

    I’ll throw a party to celebrate..

    But I don’t think I’ll need to send out any invites..

  185. N.D. says:

    I checked photos on PopSugar and it looks like their rings are name-rings, hers says Justin and his says Jennifer.

    And this is from a woman who was whining about missing sensitivity chips and other uncoolness she endured while spring cleaning for 5 years.

  186. Sakyiwaa says:

    @kasper; yikes! are you *gasp* …obsessed… with me? you’ve been stalking me on the past three threads i’ve clicked on…
    *bats long, thick, dark eyelashes*

  187. Sakyiwaa says:

    a ho is a ho is a ho… Jennifer Manastealin…

  188. Sakyiwaa says:

    In 7 years…………
    vince vaughn – check
    paul sculfor – check
    john mayer – check
    chris gartin – check
    sport fuck guy – check
    justin theroux – check
    everyone else papz didna get – check

    keep going, Jennifer! By all means, don’t stop at Justin. I think different men, every year complete the ‘real’ you. 🙂

    Happy now, Kasper? Crazy enough for you. I like to meet people’s expectations sometimes. ROFL!

  189. Josephina says:

    Well, well, well, Steven Huvane!!! Congrats!!

    OK, you PR guru. You’ve got the web sites all over talking about Jen and her hypocrisy. The “Good Girl” image was worn out and needed new tires… s you replaced with the “I am so hot I can now take ANY Z-list man!”

    Man, Jennifer, a woman of such “high morals,” is in such high demand! Look at what ” A Decade of Hotness” award can do for you! Exactly how many of you are envious of the PR she is getting. What a blessing! (Chuckles, staggering to stand up again.)

    Seriously, I could never think of Jennifer as a man-stealer. Her neediness and lack of self-esteem would be a such a fun sponge.

    Anyway, I do believe now that she is in a relationship with Justin. Now, hurry up and get pregnant before he leaves. You do not have 7 more years to ponder over this. Do the Laura Dern!!

  190. thesea says:

    The number of comments here is proof positive that the main interest in the Brange is Jennifer Aniston.

    Face it, despising Jennifer Aniston is the real motive behind apparently worshipping the ScandalBrand.

    An Angie life is only a reaction to a Jennifer. Jennifer is the real deal. That is what chaps you cavewomen so much.

  191. anom says:

    chinny getting negative press for her bed-hopping, and (recently) cheating first on her good friend’s husband which stevie H. hushed pronto to boning a balding, KFed3 who saw a way to upgrade to benefit his profile and career. oh no, can’t have that!! can’t expose the chin as a wh*re who has hoodwinked her fans. (the tabloid media has always known but her $$$$ have protected her til now) looks like she the $$$$ needs to be upped…(Re-negotiations Y’all)

  192. Sakyiwaa says:

    @Whatever; “…then my opinion of Brad will dramatically change, since you are basically saying he is a pathetic douche who hangs on until something better comes along. Never saw him as that weak or pathetic. Its funny crap when Brad fans try to defend him and make him sound worse!”

    ————————————————–
    what’s your opinion of Theroux then?

    cos I don’t how Jen has made her situation any better by going for a person like him.

    Brad stuck it out for 7 years = pathetic douche
    Theroux stuck it out for 14 years = pathetic douche x 2

    At least, Brad had a reason to hang in there: he was trying to respect the sanctity of his marriage… Ended up being a yeoman’s job after 4 years. At least, he didn’t waste Aniston’s time.

    Theroux…? Not so much…

    No marriage, and still wasted 14 solid years of Heidi’s time…

    Pathetic Douche x 2. Good luck, Jen (waving)!

  193. Mia says:

    Preach it, Franny!

  194. Katherine M. says:

    “I checked photos on PopSugar and it looks like their rings are name-rings, hers says Justin and his says Jennifer”

    ROTFLMAO!! No, Stop. You’re killing me! What is this? 8th grade? Tacky name jewelry? C’mon, Justin, be a man and get her name tatooed on you.

    He reminds me of a less talented and fatter Alan Cumming.

  195. Katherine M. says:

    Yea, Franny!

    Some people have their values upside down. You sure have your priorities right.

  196. bogie says:

    Brad Pitt was talking about the end of that marriage during the very first year. Go and search for his interviews. They were not even around each other in 2003 when he was filming Troy. She is someone that will play the game the guys way just to get him, but in truth she does not have the dude. She did it with Pitt and all the guys after him cause she wanted someone famous …young…good looking. Pitt was getting up there and probably just wanted to be married. She had a good rep, was popular, had as much dough as him at the time, and he seemed to date women that have issues. He seems to want to be someone’s hero, but evidentally he grew up. Frankly he never should have married her if it was going to be a marriage of convenience. She just wanted him cause he was Brad Pitt. They both messed up. Problem is Aniston keeps messing up. I am just waiting for the pure entertainment of how the tabloids are going to work this.

  197. Nikki Girl says:

    This guy is really gross. Normally I like scruffy bad-boy types, but he gives off a really sleazy vibe.

  198. thesea says:

    Check Justin in interviews
    He’s hot and extremely intelligent – and he has a sort of authority and command – he thinks for himself –

    Unfortunately Brad was and reamins a people pleaser and, let’s be honest, a bit of a phogna bologna –

    That is what I think wholesome Jen found out after she married him – that she married an empty vessel. The only person who would want to reproduce with an empty vessel is another empty vessel – just two masks desperate to please the crowds.

    Jen is real and always was.

  199. nnn says:

    That is what I think wholesome Jen found out after she married him – that she married an empty vessel.
    —————-
    I am sorry but Jen is the one who whined AFTER the marriage. Proof that empty vessel or not she wanted to stay married to him and not the other way around.

    She is the one saying that she was a control freak and that she could never live with herself thanking Brad for being brave enough to support her issues.

    And since she is the one woman in the world who was dumb enough to date twice a man that brags about pissing on his women as a foreplay, publicly claimed to love the way he ‘think thoughts’ and we all know the obnoxious thoughts of that individual, i would say that Jennifer is not only phony but she has to be the dumbest 42 years old in Hollywood.

    I really never understaoo why her fans think she deserve better when she is notoriousely more than ‘not a bright’ woman and therefore won’t be able to keep the attention of man who ask more than a pretty face and a body. She is the one with a massive mass of air between the two ears.

    You don’t spent 6 years peaching and painting yourself as a snowhite to become the witch as your fans try to find contortionist ways to change the rules so that they don’t have to call you with the same nasty adjectives they have called other women in your position.

    Fraud and hypocrite thy name is jennifer Aniston only rivaled by the rise in hypocricy that has reached an unbeleivable level of her own fanbase who don’t hesitate throwing under the bus not only the ex girlfriend whose feelings and 14 years of love counts for nil but unmarried couples as a whole too.

    All this to defend Aniston reputation romanticizing in the process an act/a situation they painted like the ultimate sin for 6 years and until 3 days ago.

    After that you are in no position whatsoever to point fingers at ANYONE if you have to resort in abusing, insulting, denying, belitteling dismissing hundreds of millions of unmarried individuals in a committed relationship to save face of your precious 42 years old always irresponsible, never guilty, never phony, eternal virgin Jennifer Aniston.

    If you have to go to that length, using the ‘by any means necessary’ and throwing unmarried couples under the bus to justify not the ‘sin’ but your sudden opposite reaction and new appreciation for it based on the identity of the person, you have lost it big time and has hitten the absolute bottom of immorality.

    It’s all about the unebelievable flipflopping attitude of the jenfans and the extent to wich they will go including insulting unmarried couples to justify THEIR NEW WARM RECEPTION for a same act instead of just being coherent with teh same mindset you have displayed during those 6 last years and say ‘Jen you were wrong’.

    Since she has to stay pure and innocent, let’s throw those unmarried couples under the bus and insult the naivity of those women who stay with a men years without getting married. It’s THEIR fault, Jen is innocent and the victim in that. Those women are the guilty ones.

    PATHETIC and CRASS through and through.

  200. Reality says:

    @ Franny, I don’t care about your relationship and don’t really know why you brought it up, but in my opinion, yes a marriage is more of a commitment than a long term relationship, and not because you wear a white dress and a shiny ring. One is a commitment between two people, one is a commitment before God and the law. One is a break up and one is a divorce. One is cheating and one is adultery.

    Sure owning a dog together is also a commitment, and I’m not challenging that, but marriage and/or children are much more serious IN MY OPINION.

    Sure it’s just a bit of paper to you, (like money, adoption papers, a mortgage agreement, a law diploma) but it does means something to others, and I really hate how you’re belittling marriage in the same way you claim others are belittling your relationship.

    Not everyone is going to agree with you, and you’re welcome to your own opinion. We’ll have to disagree. But I’m not a fan of being called a bitch (even in a casual way) by a stranger on the internet just because we don’t agree on a particular subject.

    @Lisa- nobody would come.

  201. Chloe says:

    @thesea

    “Jen is real and always was. ”

    “An Angie life is only a reaction to a Jennifer. Jennifer is the real deal. That is what chaps you cavewomen so much.”

    Ahahhahah:))
    No really. I have to go scream at the ocean now. And then do some healing. Nude. On the rocks.

  202. Reality says:

    @ chloe- I do agree with you that Aniston handled things badly by talking about her divorce at all. She should have kept it private, but I also think the press is more responsible for the ‘pity party’ image and the whole ‘triangle’ nonsense than she is. I agree that she worked the ‘woe is me’ ‘screaming at the ocean’ lonely single girl angle at first, but I doubt if she planned for it to become what it did over a few remarks. It was her marriage and she had every right to discuss it with Vanity Fair or Vogue, but they chose which quotes to run with.

    I thought she did Brad and Angelina a favour by saying that she believed there was no cheating. She did not need to defend them, and could have made things much, much worse. The ‘sensitivity chip’ thing was probably bitterness over his impregnating Jolie before the ink was dry on their divorce papers, and the ‘uncool’ remark was a response to Jolie saying she couldn’t wait to get to work each day, which was a really stupid thing to say.

    But it was her marriage and she has a right to say what she wants, even if I think it does her a disservice.

  203. Flu says:

    KKK… Jennifer aniston is not intelligent why she needs a “intelligent man”… to go to a trip ? To see her stupid movies? Do yoga….etc
    This is the real world ?

    Jennifer Aniston will still be speaking the way she does, I don’t dislike Aniston but for a woman her age her conversation is unbelievable you can’t believe there is someone out there with all that is happening in the world JA is entirely self-focused and have such limited vocabulary and speaks and acts like a pre-teen. So many of the stars today are glamorous but when they open their mouth you are impressed to find out they are highly intelligent.

  204. nnn says:

    @ 174 Cheyenne

    If my spouse referred to our marriage as a “merger” in a public interview, I’d be out of there before he knew which end was up.
    ———————————–
    Unless it’s a marriage of convenience that both agreed to.

    I strongly beleived that it was a business deal more than a marraige between those two. children versus A list actor who could open doors and accelerate his wife transition from TV to silver screen.

    Notice that it began with a blind date, so somewhere, somehow, it was arranged to fit and create an illusion of a ‘perfect couple’ just like Studios used to do in the 50’s.

    You cannot single out one over the other, they both play the devil’s advocate and both married each other for bad reason, a merger of interests, a business deal. Hell they both played their best part during that last vaccation, showing PDA when they had already agree to divorce and made it official hours later.

    They both said it was more an association between buddies. Brad said that Jennifer and him knew from the start that they will do it as long as it works.

    John Aniston himself said that Brad wasn’t the one who really wanted to be married but jen’s. Again luke warm feelings.

    I beleive Brad was in love with Gwyneth, and wanted to start a family. When the engangement was suddenly called off he made the mistake that many people do : looking for a mother more than a partner. I beleive he saw Jen and she gave him some guarantee that she was mother material. Hence the marriage, hence him decorating the nursery, hence him staying away from Hollywood preparing to be a father.

    Whatever everyone say, i am convinced that the issues was about children, about when to start them and someway, somehow he discovered that he had been punk’ed, that he thought and she made him think that after two years of dating, the marriage was the starting point to put both career on hold and focus on beginning a family.

    I am even more convinced of that because :

    1) On the set of MAMs, the recurrent info were how he was crazy about Mad and played with him most of the times.

    2) One of the first interview he gave talking about Jolie, was that he was shocked to discover that she is the opposite of the image he had of her, that she is a great mum.

    3) Another interview : Jolie is the rock of their family and the sweetest woman he ever met and that the best thing he has ever done is making her the mother of his children.

    4) His quickness to rearranged his home to fit Jolie’s children, his quickness to adopt them, his constant asking (according Jolie) for her to have a child.

    Many like to paint Jolie as a cold blooded seductress but from all account, in reality, she is more shy than the go for it attitude and as Oliver Martinez said, she is the one being chased. I beleive what seduced Brad is her relationship and motherhood instinct towards Maddox.

    When you look at it, it’s all make sense. He was eager to embrace fatherhood and has been frustrated for years and after Gwyneth, he wasn’t ready to get hurt again and look for a mother even if she was a rebound, hence the merger, hence that little sentence of him about Jen and him knwing from the start what they were into and that it will go on until it runs its course…not words of a marriage of true love.

    Their opposite lifestyle with his ex wife is even more obvious and really telling.

  205. lisa says:

    @Franny..

    Great post.. Wow funny how these women are demeaning relationships to make Aniston the “wholesome one”.

    I said it before and will say it again. They need to be careful with all this Marriage is the only commitment that counts. Treading on dangerous territory.

    Marriage is not for everyone. So people have a bigger commitment without it. And with the divorce rate what it is. Obviously that little ring and paper does not guarantee it lasting for a lifetime. HOW many celebrity break ups have there been. Heidi/Justin lasted 14 year. She is a woman like Aniston. Why are women downplaying her life so that Jennifer comes out looking squeaky clean.

    Wonder how many of the women spouting of about this new enlightened rule of what equals commitment will be passing it on to their boyfriends/ or men they are dating. How many are going to tell him that he is still free to do whatever until he puts a ring on that finger

    YEAH I didn’t thinks so.

  206. Carolyn says:

    If poor Jen is so darn fantastic and every guy’s fantasy woman….why don’t any of them stay with her? Something doesn’t add up here. I’m so glad so many people here are over this PR charade.

  207. thesea says:

    @ Carolyn

    Why I know why! She must forget to club “her Man” (capital M) over the head with her Cave Woman Club (and a Real Woman that is)before she drags said meat back to her Real Woman Cave.

    Either that or she forgets to tattoo his name and coordinates on her ass before he leaves so he can find his way home.

  208. luce says:

    Thesea you need help ! your speech is incoherent ! DUH !

  209. Addie says:

    Let’s be honest. Does anyone truly belive that Brad and Jen would still be married today if Angie didn’t come along?I sure don’t.

    Brad told Oprah in an inerview that this time of his life is “the happiest he has ever been” (with Angie) Even Oprah had to say that she could see that for herself.

    Brad, Angie and the kids are really happy and solid. EVEN JEN seems to be happier with all the press, interviews and attention she gets (even more than when married to Brad)In the end it all worked out well for everyone involved.

  210. Josephina says:

    Reality– Time to get the facts STRAIGHT.

    Aniston is a woman who has made a string of poor personal/professional decisions, shared it with the public, AND has NOT owned up to her shenanigans while doing so. Good or bad, own up to your actions.

    She ran her mouth too long to the media and to her friends, who then said things to the media and in public(Courtney Cox, David Arquette, Chelsea Handler, John Mayer, Laura Dern) for 7 years, not just the few months after the divorce announcement. Very poor judgement which yielded very poor results. She is seen as a woman-child.

    She created the triangle. Once she saw it get out of control, she could have directed her PR team to stop it. “Pity party, screaming at the ocean,” and crying to interviewers about Angelina’s pregnancy –these are undeniably her words and actions. She got sympathy at the expense of defaming two people, Brad and Angie. There existed an opportunity for revenge, and she went for it, over and over again.

    Because of her jealousy over Angelina, she misconstrued Angelina’s statement. Angie said it would be lovely for her kids to later see how Mommy and Daddy fall in love and then try to kill each other. She was referring to the plot of the movie, Mr. and Mrs. Smith. Obviously, Brad and Angie ARE NOT trying to kill each other. Ergo the Vogue 2008 issue when she called back the interviewer a week later as she had even more time to seeth, and mischaracterized Angie as “uncool.” Two months later, Brad gave an interview, which really was uncool, and stated that he fell in love with Angie. Further clearing the air, he said his marriage was a deadend and that fatherhood did not “feel right” or “natural” until he started with Angie. Brad shut it down right there.

    Aniston still was not done. Next were public comments about saving her husband’s voicemails. This was creepy because Brad and Angie had increased their family size to 3 children. Then there was the nominee presentation at the Oscars, two more magazine articles in 2010 where she referenced Brad, ie. “spring cleaning” “5 years after Brad” nonsense. And the worst of all, TWO rants given by her bff, Chelsea Handler, in a span of 3 months in 2010.

    She has totally ABUSED her PR relationship and exposure to the media for personal vendettas. Brad and Angie use PR to bring awareness of humanitarian issues and generate millions of dollars to multiple domestic and international charitable foundations.

    See the difference in character now? Aniston forced the world through her media manipulations to suffer and endure her stagnant growth process.

  211. mln76 says:

    I can only say that the person who turned me into a ‘loon’ was Jen and her exploitation of her divorce, and that her accounts in Vogue and Vanity Fair left me doubting there was any actual cheating. I do believe like nnn that Pitt entered his marraige to Aniston still in hurting from his breakup to Paltrow. It’s interesting to note just like every other public relationship she’s had since this one was set up by their managers according to them. I also think Aniston was starstruck and married Brad Pitt the ‘movie star’ not Brad Pitt the man. I think very soon after their were fissures in the marraige due to Pitt’s over romanticized view of marraige(the guy was engaged 6x’s for hecks sake) Aniston concentrating on her career (Pitt didn’t work much of their early marraige), and their basic incompatibility. I think Pitt with a conservative upbringing couldn’t bring himself to divorce which is why he dragged it out and there were reportedly SEVERAL separations. People forget that the rumors of fissure in the Pitt/Aniston marraige were well documented long before Jolie came around and that alot of their positive quotes about eachother were in response to the tab stories and rumored separations etc. I also think there was a major break after the Friends shoot when Brad and during the shooting of Troy long before the shoot of MAMS.
    I think it’s telling that along with the quotes about ‘mergers’ and ‘not the love of my life’ that Jen failed to thank Pitt when she won her Golden Globe.
    But the detail that always stuck with me is that by Jen’s account she was never on the MAMS set and only met Angelina once on the set of Friends. If she was happily married she would have visited him there at least once especially since Angie already had a rep.
    Also if you read Vogue Aniston states how proud she is of Brad and how things ended well, would anyone really be proud of a man that lied and cheated on them? Then her subsequent exploitation especially joking about Brad’s children and endlessly bashing Angie while praising Pitt actually encouraged the tabloid stories of a triangle. It was all so calculated and manipulative.
    Of course I could be wrong but I think Pitt/Jolie didn’t cheat they may have had an very close friendship with chemistry or an ’emotional affair’. I think it’s very likely that Pitt/Aniston were already on a trial separation but waiting for both of their movies to premiere in order to decide what to do. Also the vacation and announcement was calculated. They knew they were splitting before that vacation but wanted to wait to release the story on a holiday when it would get the least attention-hence the ‘affectionate’ pap-walk where neither looks to happy.
    Now with the current situation I think there was subsequent overlap and that this girl obviously feels betrayed or else she wouldn’t have so explicitly stated how long they were together and when she moved out. JT obviously lied to her and it’s possible he also lied to Aniston. I don’t hate on her if there was actual cheating because people are human. BUT I think she should have a reckoning for the things she’s said and done in the press directed and her ex’s family. Because I do think that Brad treated her better than JT did Heidi. Actually ending it with her before he officially got involved with Angie.

  212. Gabrielle says:

    @ reality ita about your comments on marriage. Sounds like some people are insecure about their own issues. If you want to get married and he doesn’t move on he’s not the guy for you.

  213. jocular says:

    erm Josephina
    It doesn’t seem to have been said two weeks after on the phone as the journalist in the article writes “Aniston, still galled, shakes her head in disbelief. “That stuff about how she couldn’t wait to get to work every day? That was really uncool.”
    He saw her shake her head.

  214. Deltona lakes says:

    Josephina may I add the comment she made about they all go to hamptons and referred to Brad and angies kids by name. I believe she said “as im holding zahara in my arms”.
    Whether she was joking or not. Why would she Acknowledge to the public that she knows the names of all their kids. Im sorry but I think she was obsessed with continuing brad and Angelina triangle, not the media. She could have shut it down a long time ago.

  215. Joan says:

    @ mln76 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PVrmAAWBnMY

    V Magazine – OCTOBER, 2007

    Christoper Bollen: When you look back on your divorce from Jennifer Aniston in 2005 and all of that media attention as you moved from one high profile relationship to an even more high profile relationship, do you think you handled the situation well? Do you think of that whole period as utter hell?

    BP: I don’t know how better to have handled it. My view was, this is no one’s business in the end-at least in matters of the heart. So you need to protect all involved as much as possible. I don’t know if that cooled things off or exacerbated them, but it was a thing I felt justly about at the time. Again, the thing guiding me then was you don’t know how many days you have and you need life to be everything you want it to be.

    CB: I guess even asking you about it now just propagates the sensationalism.

    BP: You know, there is one other thing I’d like to say about it, because Jen and I still maintain a deep friendship and have a lot of life together that isn’t erased in any way. Thinking back to that time, the entertainment media was speculating on things very early on. And the most important thing about that time was for Jen and me to figure out if-how do I put it?-if we didn’t want to go on without any outside influence. Is this where we got off? Have we taken this as far as we wanted to?

    CB: Do you think all of the outside speculation forced your hand at all?

    BP: That wasn’t it. I was just trying to dodge it all and stay true to what I believed in. The most important thing was for Jen and me to answer those questions without being pulled out of that. Those questions had to be answered before an attraction for Angie could be answered.

    CB: Do you find it upsetting how the media still has an obsessive interest in linking Jen and Angelina?

    BP: It’s so manufactured. We don’t pay attention to it. I hear that they drag my mom into it. She doesn’t deserve any of this. She is the most open, loving woman you’ll ever come across. They make things up and make money off of it. I am surprised about that.

  216. Cheyenne says:

    mln76: I think Pitt with a conservative upbringing couldn’t bring himself to divorce
    ==============================================

    Spot on. You don’t escape your upbringing that easily and I think Brad, along with his siblings, were raised with an old-fashioned view of marriage, i.e. it’s a forever commitment and you stick it out for better or worse. His parents have been together for almost 50 years and his siblings are both married with several children apiece. I wouldn’t be surprised if the senior Pitts had been after Brad to “settle down” for years before he finally got married.

    Aniston didn’t turn me into a “loon” but her fans certainly did, posting messages wishing death on Angie and the children and making despicable racial comments about the older kids. It’s unfair to hold Aniston responsible for what her fans say or do. But you have to wonder what kind of celeb attracts vicious, hateful people like that.

  217. Cheyenne says:

    Carolyn: If poor Jen is so darn fantastic and every guy’s fantasy woman….why don’t any of them stay with her? Something doesn’t add up here.
    =====================================================

    I’ve been asking the same question for the past five years. Good luck getting a response to that one. Usually her fans respond by bleating “They never dump her, she dumps them.” Yeah, right. In the Aniston fantasyland, reality is whatever you want to make it.

    __________________________________________________________

    thesea: wholesome Jen … Jen is real and always was.
    =====================================================

    “Wholesome Jen”?! ROTFLMBAO!!!

    She’s about as real as a three-headed giraffe. Her entire image has been manufactured by her publicist — with rather calamitous results. If she had the brains of a flea she would have fired him a long time ago.

  218. Star87 says:

    This guy is a cheater and aniston knew about his girlfriend as she had visited the set in the fall. The ex and theroux continued to live together and go out in public up until early May (there are pics up to late April- early May of them holding hands etc). Both theroux and aniston acted horribly.

  219. anonymous says:

    Theroux looks like Jack The Ripper, Mad Hatter in Alice In Wonderland, or Abe Lincoln. So it have come to this scraping the bottom of the barrel he certainly is no Brad Pitt. They don’t look good together, they look like an odd couple. I think JA have picked up the wrong man, somethings strange about him. Well at the least JA might get to attend the oscars or golden globe I am sure that is her intentions.

  220. bluhare says:

    A heartfelt thanks to everyone for making this one of the most entertaining threads ever!

  221. Codzilla says:

    Wow, this one really went off the rails, didn’t it?

  222. Laura says:

    bluhare,codzilla: I know right? Going through these comments has been a truly entertaining and hilarious ride.

    Never in my life have I read such…insane commentary. And literally insane. These people say the same things over and over again expecting a different result. I think I should do a study on these people.

    Thanks everyone!

  223. skibunny says:

    What a “Hen Party” this is.

    Calamitous Results?? Well if that’s what you call millions in your bank account. I’d refer to it as success myself.
    Truth is most women are threatened by women like Jennifer Aniston. She’s rich, beautiful and SINGLE. Living the good life, while you are on here, consumed with envy, obsessively pounding away on your keyboards, trying to convince yourselves and others she lives a miserable existence.

    I have to agree with the poster above who said the main interest in the Brange is Aniston. There are over 200 comments on here. That pretty much says it all.

  224. N.D. says:

    “I have to agree with the poster above who said the main interest in the Brange is Aniston. There are over 200 comments on here. That pretty much says it all.”

    Yeah. And how many of them are about Anniston herself? All the rage/interest is about triangle, when this guy of hers was first mentioned nobody bothered to comment.

  225. luce says:

    200 comments to show her hypocrisy, it’s not enough !
    fakaniston !

  226. Eve says:

    @ N.D.:

    I think I love you.

  227. Chloe says:

    @ skibunny

    Yeah. My life is nothing without Jennifer Aniston. 😀

    I’m sorry, I would elaborate but I need to do my yoga cleanse now. Followed by some healing and rolling in the sand.

  228. N.D. says:

    @Eve Moi non plus (c) famous french song 🙂

  229. Violet says:

    @skibunny

    I don’t think anyone’s jealous of Jen these days. She’s rich, but that’s about only thing she has going for her. Her career pretty much began and ended with Friends, and she’s dated a string of douchebags since her divorce.

    @Franny

    I agree with you. A marriage certificate is just a piece of paper and half of all marriages end in divorce. Justin and his ex were together for most of their adult lives, which is a far bigger commitment than Jen’s 5-year marriage to Brad.

  230. Franny says:

    Reality- I wasn’t saying that you should be interested in my relationship. I was using it as an example of commitment, and how some people, although married, may not have as much of a committed relationship. Maybe you believe in God and therefore believe that your marriage is more important. Personally, I do not. I do want to get married, yes. But its not because I need to PROVE my relationship is real. So again…you are saying that my 3+ year relationship doesn’t mean as much as a 4 month relationship because one has a ring and the other doesn’t. You are saying that its okay for everyone who isn’t legally/before God married to “cheat” on their SO. I’m glad I don’t live in your world.

  231. Eve says:

    @ N.D.:

    You don’t love me anymore or you just posted the name of the song?

    *heart beats fast*

    P.S.: I know the song, I’ve seen a lot of tv ads for motels here (here a motel is a place where people go to have sex) that use Serge Gainsbourg’s song. Speaking of Gainsbourg, I watched a Youtube video where he was being interviewed along with Whitney Houston…hilarious! The look on her face when he says he’d like to f*ck her is priceless. And the host? He was so embarrassed! LOL!

  232. N.D. says:

    @Eve It’s an affirmative answer (in the song), just a playfull one 🙂

  233. fizXgirl314 says:

    WOW!!!! bitches be crazy 😐

  234. Lucky Charm says:

    Prince William and Kate Middleton were together, and living together, for ten years before they got married. Just because you don’t get married within a year of dating doesn’t mean that you aren’t committed to that person. 14 years is a long time to be with someone, married or not. That’s a high school freshman’s entire life!

  235. Cheyenne says:

    skibunny: Truth is most women are threatened by women like Jennifer Aniston.
    ===============================================

    Oh riiiiiiiight. You have no idea how threatened I feel by a leather-faced serial dumpee who is about to get laid and played once again. Story of her life, isn’t it?

    The only thing Aniston has that I want is her paycheck.

  236. lisa says:

    @N D

    I think you have that backwards. Because if Jennifer were the driving force the Rags would plaster her on a magazine without a reference to Brad or Angie. which I will say hardly happens. She has a new “man” and that is not the main gossip for the tabloids. It has be relegated to the sidebar. But stories about Brad/Angie are front and center.

    They are a force that has nothing to do with her. Most of the comments for the JP fans (well for me) are about the double standard that her fans have been spouting off. How they are weighing relationship to make whatever is happening with she and Justin to be above board. They need proof. Something they never need with stories about Angie or Brad

    So my correction of your statement would be that

    the main interest in Aniston is the Brange

  237. Laura says:

    I love celebrity gossip. I like making fun of celebrities when they do something foolish or when they get up to some tomfoolery.

    But I have to say as soon as you’re emotionally invested in strangers’ lives (yes they are strangers no matter how much you think you know them), it’s time to take a little break.

    And by emotionally invested, I mean constructing (i.e. fabricating) relationship timelines from magazine interviews and tabloid bs, excusing the behavior of your “side” of this lunacy, and personally insulting other people just because they see things differently than you.

    Can’t we all just agree that they are all overpaid jerks who play pretend for a living and move on? Can’t we just make bitchy comments about their physical attributes like Jolie’s Botox Vein and Aniston’s Witchy Poo Chin? Or their fashion choices on the red carpet?

    Can’t we all just…get along?

  238. Franny says:

    Cheyenne…and her boots!

  239. N.D. says:

    @lisa That statement you’re arguing with isn’t mine

    @Cheyenne Her body isn’t that bad either. Not sure you can maintain it without her money though so yeah, her paycheck is the first thing I’d snatch from her given the chance 🙂

  240. John Wayne Lives says:

    She probably thought noone would care if the gf wasn’t a “name”, and they could spin this, no problem.
    Real low class Jen.
    And if this is the real you that your pr has been hidding all these years, then good for Brad for leaving you. Some divorces ARE a good thing.
    Done with her.
    And I hope Angie is laughing.

  241. Enough Already says:

    teresa sounds like she is typing loaded!!!!
    But remember when a wise man argues with a fool, from a distance no one can tell the two apart..

  242. bogie says:

    What a bust… I thought this mess would end up on big gossip sites like the huffington. She is in with all those gossip sites so no big surprise. Oh well…Aniston is good at making a fool of herself … I am sure we will get that entertainment soon enough.

  243. Overrated says:

    Maniston has the head of a mule

  244. Cheyenne says:

    @Franny: I don’t know about her boots, but she has some slammin’ Jimmy Choo stilettos. I’d love a pair of those… preferably in every color they come in.

    @John Wayne Lives: I don’t think Angie is laughing over this. I don’t think Angie cares about Aniston one way or another.

  245. Charlotte says:

    This thread is completely insane!!!!! As for this relationship, which seems real at this point, shame on them. But to all you hopefuls that are dreaming and salivating over the idea that this will take away heat from the Brange, it won’t. They’re still dirtbags for what they did to Aniston. The only difference now is that Aniston has also stooped to dirtbag-level cretinism. It’s disappointing, given her history. Yet, really not shocking! The fan-crazed hypocrisy is astounding, however. If you’ve spent your entire blog-career saying things like “you can’t steal a happy man” or “if someone cheats, it’s because the relationship was dead/unhappy” or “you shouldn’t take up with someone when they’ve still got someone else”, please apply these creeds to BOTH situations. AT LEAST show a little consistency!

  246. LEGALLYBLONDE says:

    Jennifer, when this guy dumps your skinny butt, I hear Hef is free. I think that’s the only man she hasn’t had in Hollyweird. Town Bicylce.

  247. crazydaisy says:

    OMG. That dress?! With that cutout!? T*t-F*ing central!

    And the dude looks like an ugly dog. Ew.

  248. lisa says:

    @N.D.

    forgive my mistake.. It got insane in here.

    My apologies.

  249. Cheyenne says:

    @LEGALLYBLONDE: OMG, now you know you are wrong for that! ROFLMAO!!