These are new photos of Kirstie Alley at a screening of Horrible Bosses. Before you get all up in arms – “ZOMG, she wore a SIZE 4 ball gown to a screening!” – let me just say that the screening was Kirstie’s second event of the night – her first event was an appearance at a charity event for the Duke of Edinburgh’s International Awards or something. I got kind of confused as to exactly what it was, but suffice to say, Kristie had a reason for wearing a gown.
So… about the gown. How awful is it? Pretty terrible. But, you know, she’s a size six now. And I’m sure this gown has a little “size 6” label sewn into it. Her poor assistants. Besides the size of the dress, there is a problem with the color. The fabric. The cut. Everything, really. I don’t know how a dress this ugly gets made.
By the way, CB wanted me to mention that Kirstie is a cradle-robbing hussy (or something). She recently dumped her 21-year-old boyfriend/lover Shancie Boyd, and now she’s dating “professional ballroom dancer” Ted Volynets. He’s 21 years old as well, and if you think Kirstie is really having sex with these boys, then you believe anything. I think Kirstie “dates” these young guys much like Xenu “helps” John Travolta and Kelly Preston stay together. You can see a photo of Kirstie and her professional ballroom dancer here. I feel very strongly that he spends a lot of time in spas with Kirstie’s BFF Travolta.
Photos courtesy of Fame & Pacific Coast News.
Yeah, it does nothing for her 22 inch waist.
MY Eyesssss!! Burrnningg…
*crawls away to be with Gollum in the Misty mountains*
OK, the color and pattern are awful, but she actually looks good for her. The dress fits, and she looks shapely in it and not obese. Granted, it’s wrinkled and there’s a stain down the front of it, but this was her second event of the evening in this dress.
I guess I’m nuts but I actually like it.
Kirtsie O’Hara: “Mamie…tear down those drapes and make me a dress to wear to see Mr. Butler!”
😆
If I could take that fabric and make a cocktail length dress with a better bodice (the boob area is just matronly), I would. But my skin is much darker than Kirstie’s and looks good against yellows. I don’t even like yellow, particularly, but against fair skin it looks way too jaundice-y.
BUT it does look like she’s maintaining her weight loss, however much it actually was is up for debate. She does look like she lost a ton of inches in the waist, but there’s no way her waist is 22 inches. I didn’t even believe Megan Fox when she said it. 22 inches is TINY, especially for someone taller than like 5’1. And as someone who actually wears a 4 (on a good day), my waist is at least 26. These people are so delusional.
She could be a size 6. I’m a size 6 and 90% of the time I look like a freaking cow in pictures. (which is why I don’t like pictures) So I don’t know, maybe she is a size 6 and just doesn’t photograph well. I haven’t seen her in person so I can’t know for sure. Hell half of Hollywood is ‘shopped beyond recognition anyway so maybe we just don’t know what a real size 6 looks like untouched.
The dress itself is not the most hideous thing, it is the color combo that hurts.
Kirstie is flanting a healthy size and looks like a happy little cougar on the prowl but that really color hurts my eyes.
I think the color is a bit loud but I don’t think it’s an awful dress. I don’t think it really is the right tone for Kirsti but it isn’t awful.
@Linda – HA, I was going to say the same thing! I actually don’t mind the dress at all…
She may be a snarling, delusional Scientologist, but the woman looks damn good at 60 years old.
Color me shocked but I don’t hate this on her. When I clicked the link I was prepared for the usual horror but I like the way she looks. It even seems like there’s a bit of pep in her swagger. I wouldn’t be caught dead in this, sure, but it seems to be doing something for her, IMO.
The little bearded deer in the headlights behind her in the 4th picture made me smile.
That’s one ugly color and one bad pattern. No and no.
It’s definitely not great, but I’ve seen a lot worse. So IDK, it’s not that bad. What bugs me more is the fit around the waist. Not good.
Size 6 ??? I’ll never understand the metric conversion system.
It’s pretty obvious her “boy toys” (rent boys) are just with her to get their pic in the paper.
never mind the hideous dress – does this woman own a hairbrush? every photo is like she has a tornado on her head.
MODS: why am i she-who-must-be-moderated today? have i offended someone somehow? *sigh*
OMG, Kirstie looks like a bag of radioactive urine with doody floating in it!
How can a healty 21 years old boy want to be with that.. (meaning Kirstie)?
It’s refreshing to see a senior celebrity neck!
I DO like the way she is aging mostly naturally. All in all, Kirstie is still a beautiful woman.
Looks good on her.
That dress is awful!
She looking good, she should have a stylist help her find something really great and flattering. And then she should comb her hair.
Her face looks hard – and she needs to get a decent haircut (I have said so many times about so many people that most of you probably think I am a hairdresser – I am not!)
Yellow is a difficult color for caucasians to wear and this dress is even worse due to the ugly pattern.
No no no he’s just “her gay” like having the newest LV handbag. Don’t you watch Real Housewives of Duh-lusion-ville? By the looks of this dress he don’t like her much letting her go out lookin a hot mess. Shame on him!
@ Lucy2, second on the hair. It seems every pic I see of her, her hair looks like a rat’s nest.
This looks like Dina Bar-El. the dresses are fun in person, but photograph poorly. This one overall is bad, too miuch going on in the bodice, but it fits her and she looks happy.
I actually think she looks great and I love the dress.
On that first photo the dress sort of looks like a giant palazzo jumpsuit. Horrible!
Her clutch looks like a super-sized rice krispie treat (“Hom nom nom…”)
Are we sure it’s a dress? The first photo it looks like a jumpsuit (am I the only one who sees the pant legs?). Either way, it’s hideous. The color is awful, as is the pattern. And I agree with other posters about her hair — does she not own a brush? Her appearance would be improved a thousand-fold if she would just brush her damn hair.
Wow, I think I overdosed on bitch juice today. Must be a hangover from the cracktinis yesterday to drown out my loathing for Linmate and her continual thwarting of justice.
If I look that good @ 60 – rock on.
Not the greatest fit but overall the style is okay.
I actually don’t mind this so much.
I do think if she went back to her natural hair color it would be much nicer.
She is washed out with the yellow tones and the blonde hair.
looks like what my cat threw up
to answer your question, i guess the fabric manufacturer had to either throw that dye or use it… and chose being environmentally friendly instead of humane
I’m 5’4″, weigh 110-113, and I wear a 0/2. My waist ranges 27-28 inches. Granted I’ve had three kids (twins ten months old next week woohoo!)
Her face is gorgeous, the dress does nothing for her boobs, tho. I agree if it were a shorter less formal style dress it would be pretty.
I’ll say one thing about Kirstie, and I sincerely mean this, she does have a strinkingly attractive face…she always has.
Well, if that’s a size 6 I’ve been doing myself an injustice wearing size 12 and 14’s for so long.
Geekchic – Yep, it’s not a dress. You can see the space between her legs in the first photo. I also noticed in the close up of her face her eyes look pretty bloodshot.
RhonyNYC: Awesome!!!!
It’s mainly the color and design of the dress, but honestly Kirstie looks pretty damn good. however, size 6 my ass.
I read somewhere that yellow is an important color to Scientologists, but this dress is hideous
my friend saw her at this last night & said she looked like a model. however, my friend has questionable taste, so i’m going to side-eye her a bit today.
The dress looks like slinky silk so for that reason alone I like it and it looks good on Kirstie. Does everyone forget that she is 60 years old? I know for a fact my mother did not look like that at her age. The lady is doing okay. And some of you need to grow up.
Looks like a big bedspread.
We are not begrudging her her new figure, but the number-oriented delusions. She looks fantastic for being 60, but a size 4-6 she is not and 22′ waist she most definitely does not have. At 5’7” and a bit and 114 pounds I only have a 24.5” waist and everyone is harping on how I should put on more weight.
So forgive those of us who do not gulp up her numeral bullshit. She might be trying to pimp her cult supported diet scam and she’s desperate for results. She may actually believe what she’s saying, in which case her situation is really sad and she needs professional help. But no one is criticising her for her figure. Bitch looks good.
Also, why have I been in moderation for the past few days? Is it something I’ve said or done or is it just a glitch in the system?
Kaiser, she looks okay, besides if she was fatter the paps would be showing us snaps of her…
How many women postmenopause look that good? Hardly any. I like the dress. I think from the waist up she is svelte. It’s from the waist down that she carries all of her weight. Her arms look really good.
I never knew why her hair is always so messy. Then I took a good look at her face, and realized it’s to draw attention away from how hideous her face is. If Alec Balwin dressed as a woman when he’s 80 years old, this is what he would look like.
What’s wrong with her bottom teeth?
Love the dress on her – it needs to be fitter better around the chest.
The hair…..
‘What’s going on here? I love you. Get it together.”
Love her, love the dress. Yes, she is a little nuts but she is also hilarious. If you haven’t seen it you should watch “Fat Actress”
She looks really old and haggard.
She looks like a chintz piece of furniture-perhaps in some fusty English living room.
Even in Kirsties Cheers days she wasn’t a size six…I mean she looked fine, don’t get me wrong, but she has always been a healthy girl, and she does not look “fantastic” for 60, she looks ok, I have friends 60 that look better than Kirstie…now Christie Brinkley, who I think is 57 looks FANTASTIC for her age…
She looks great, but that dress is fugly. It reminds me of my great grandmother’s curtains
Christie Brinkley had a mid-face lift. That’s the only reason why her face looks so good. There’s an expensive beauty magazine ($9.95) that is published a few times a year that shows Christie before and after plastic surgery. I bought a copy of the magazine at Barnes and Noble but loaned it out so I can’t remember the name of it. It specializes in dermatology and plastic surgery professional procedures. I do agree that Christie does look fantastic but it’s because she had a face lift.
I’ll say it, bitch looks really good here. She’s always had a beautiful face and for 60, she looks pretty damn good. I love that she’s letting herself age naturally. I do think that her extra weight has helped with her face looking so good for 60.
I wonder if she slaps anyone who comes at her with a brush though. Her hair is always unkempt looking, like she just blow dried it without using a brush and decided it looked good.
Wow I think she looks fantastic – I really like the dress & I also think it suits her colouring.
I would love to look like her, especially at her age!
Edit to add that I’ve always thought she was a very beautiful woman, heavier or lighter.
I saw her at the womens expo in sf in person, up close, at the time rag mags came out w/that fat photo of her working out. They always trash her, idk why. She was an 8 – 10 at the most. I think for a 60yr old or even a 40yr old Woman, she looks AMAZING. I Love the dress for summer and the colors are Just Beautiful.
It is fitted, (compared to the “super flowy dresses” she was wearing when she was really heavy). And she does not look “fat” at all in these pics. I’d say she’s come a long way, and she should be proud of herself. I hope she keeps up the good work!
Kirstie ‘sleeping’ with a 21 year old pro-ballroom dancer… My ass… & she *really* has a 22in waist. (Like “LOOK bitches! I’m hittin’ that. Doesn’t that mean I’m hot?)
Please. She just rented one of Travolta’s bathhouse buddies for a while. (She probably had to put down an insurance deposit. Better not scratch/dent him or streak his spray tan, or there’ll be hell to pay.
My question is about her hair, Kirstie has always had a big head of hair and I like that it always looks like she just stumbled out of bed. But in the big picture above, it looks like she has a piece attached to the the top of her head, am I seeing things? I guess at 60 you might need some help in the hair department to make it appear thicker and abundant. IDK what the answer is but does anyone else see it?
I have seen her look worse. I did hone in on the dribble stains on the bodice. I think she either drooled wine or soup on it. If the dress weren’t so, um…PUCE?? maybe you might not see it. What is that color anyway?
Meh, I’ve seen thinner women wear FAR worse dresses on the red carpet.
I guess the “problem” with the dress is that it’s not that remarkable. It looks like something you would get at a department store.
Not good.
I don’t get the people saying how great she looks for 60….Susan Lucci, Christie Brinkley and Jane Seymour look GREAT for this age! Kirstie looks just okay, especially considering the highly pampered and privileged life she has lived.
@#58 sorry can’t read your name: I would still put Chirstie Brinkley’s before face lift face against Kirstie any day of the week and see who looks better for their age…no contest…
She looks smaller here than in recent pictures, I think?
She looks like shes lost alot of weight. However, would love to see her brush her hair sometime. She always looks like she just got out of bed.
Actually… I could accept her claim to be a size 6 in this dress.
The arm skin is consistant with people who lose weight rapidly, theres a straight line from her shoulder down her arm. There’s no bulge to her thighs nor her stomach (though the stomach may be due to Spanx).
If anything, this dress looks like it was too big and had to be altered to be smaller. Good on ya Kirstie… now stop obsessing about weight and focus on HEALTH!
The dress is pretty dire but it actually flatters her figure. Not the colour or pattern or anything.. she just looks quite slim in it. I think I have some fugly fugly clothes which I wear because they make me look slimmer. I’ve also got some reeeally nice clothes that I’ll never wear because they make me look fat. This probably isn’t the psychology behind Kirstie wearing it though. She saw it was a “size 6” so thought it would look fab on her, now that she’s lost those 90lbs!
I would love to know when she combs her hair. it looks like a rat’s nest.
some women like to get dressed… others prefer to be upholstered.
She really has lost a ton of weight, she might actually be an 8 – 10. 6 is pushing it. Ghastly material and color but the silhouette is good.
I think she looks amazing.
Thank goodness she stopped wearing the spanx leggings.
IT IS A PANTS DRESS! FIRST PICTURE YOU CAN TELL. WTF!