Is Jennifer Aniston taking a break from film work because she’s preggo?

The tabloids were on a tear last week, claiming that Jennifer Aniston is pregnant or abandoned or trying to get back with Brad Pitt, or some combination of all three. The story that I think is most likely is the pregnancy story – we talked about that last week. There’s some sketchy photo evidence that makes it seem like Aniston might actually be pregnant, although it’s debatable as to how far along she allegedly is. Considering that pregnancy rumors begin as soon as Aniston gets a boyfriend, she’s either been gestating for 13 months, or she’s just gained some “I quit smoking” weight. Or, you know, she’s knocked up. Now The Mail is getting in on the action – they claim that Aniston has told her agents that she’s going to be taking a break from work after she promotes Wanderlust next month – and the break is because family planning is on her mind (and in her womb):

Jennifer Aniston is cutting back on her work schedule amid rumours that the Friends star is pregnant.

The actress, left, who is dating 40-year-old Justin Theroux, has decided not to take on any more movies for the foreseeable future.

She has to do promotional work for Wanderlust – the movie on which she and Justin met – but Jennifer, 42, has told her agents she needs a break.

‘She wants to focus on herself and hopefully becoming a mother,’ says my source. ‘She is thinking of launching her own fashion line which would allow her to spend more time at home.’

Jennifer and Justin recently holidayed in Colorado, where they reportedly spent every night in together.

[From The Mail]

The gossip theory that I’m working on right now (in my gossip laboratory!) is that Aniston IS pregnant, and she will do the big bump reveal for the promotion of Wanderlust, perhaps conjoined with an engagement announcement. She and Justin Theroux will role their relationship out in conjunction with their film – red carpet hand-holding, a teary, confessional magazine and television interview, and of course, a loved-up, bump-showing trip to the Academy Awards. Oh, who’s going to be nominated for Best Actor this year? I don’t even remember because I was so focused on Aniston’s bump! If it actually goes down like that… well, it will get very interesting.

Photos courtesy of Pacific Coast News & Fame.

Related stories

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

221 Responses to “Is Jennifer Aniston taking a break from film work because she’s preggo?”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Len says:

    O, how I wish it would go down like that!

    • Capella says:

      Doubt though she would go the Beyonce way and show off her bump for the first time at the Oscars. Kaiser has it right, if Jen is pregnant, she will introduce her belly during her movie promo. Which looks quite good BTW! She does better when she is in a supporting role, like Marley and Me.

      Can you imagine, if Jen is announcing the Oscar winner, and Brad gets up, and while trying to give her a perfunctory polite hug, puts his hand on her belly? Can we please zoom in on Jolie’s face at that precise moment? Yeah, I know, the Brange is happy, but let us not ignore the undeniable proof that 1- The Jolie had planted nasty gossip in tabloids to turn the knife in Jen’s heart, at the beginning of her relationship with Brad. 2- Unfortunately, we can’t seem to forgive the Jolie for sleeping with yet another married|or taken man, at the behest of the “girl power” un-written law, that most of us subscribe to. Just MO, on why the possible glee, over a burned Ange. Must be that time of the month.

      • truthSF says:

        Girl, please put down the tabloids, it’s eating away at your brains.

      • Capella says:

        No tabloid-reading here, just a CB long-time fan. A site that has often covered throughout the years both Angie’s as well as Jennifer’s shenanigans.

        But it is beyond my control, this dislike of Ange. I’m one of those who can’t forget what she had done, and where she came from. Every time she fakes it for the camera, when she has a movie to promote, I cringe. Now, if she was always this gracious, even when there is no movie to promote, I might start to like her, a tad. Still find her supremely beautiful though. Unearthly so.

      • samira677 says:

        Wow somebody really needs to take their meds. It’s really pathetic that Jenfans believe there was an affair but Jennifer and her friends all said their wasn’t. I don’t know what planet you’re on but there weren’t any bad rumors about Jennifer. All of the tabloids and talkshows were 100% behind Jennifer. If you’re talking Jennifer not wanting kids, that rumor was around for at least 2 years before the divorce. Considering it’s been 7 years and no kids, that rumor isn’t so farfetched.

      • ZenB!tch says:

        One little problem Angelina “Duggar” Jolie is knocked up again. Either that or she has a distended tummy with bony legs.

        If we could put Ange’s face and boobs on Jen’s body *that* would be unearthly.

        Remember – neither AJ nor JA has her original nose.

      • Bambi says:

        See how obsessed the loonistons are with keeping the triangle alive? Newsflash, Angelina and Brad didn’t have an affair. Angelina has never been after a taken man. Yet its ironic that Aniston herself homewrecked a 14 year relationship and you have no problem with that. Moral gymnastics. Brad has felt his own baby move in Angelina’s stomach. Thats something that Aniston and her fans will never have. Because Aniston chose a career over her marriage.

    • Tazina says:

      She’s been pregnant for the last 10 years. Enough already. Some people actually believe all this BS. Until the words come out of her mouth which will no doubt be a denial of the rumors, then save your energy speculating on the pregnancy that never is.

  2. Bite me says:

    Or maybe she not getting offered any roles

    • Asli says:

      As long as she isn’t grey and saggy I think she’ll get offered roles. Albeit in stupid, repetative romcoms that Hollywood seems to think people can’t get enough of but yeah… Also, if she comes out and says she isn’t pregnant I’m thinking her and Justin are breaking up after Wanderlust premieres.

      • mln76 says:

        I actually think she’s pretty much kaput in the Rom-com field. Yes the Sandler film did well but it was Sandler and all of his films do about the same. Horrible Bosses was refreshing specifically because she was doing something different. I’d say she’s getting offered roles of playing (pick your 17-22 year-old) Moms and I don’t think Aniston is willing to play the mother of a teenager. She still hasn’t been able to get funding for that Country music movie. I think she either slows down considerably or does a high profile cable movie like Drew, Kate, and Nicole.

      • Camille (The original) says:

        mln76 – I agree with your comment.

      • Asli says:

        I actually agree. I haven’t watched any of her movies since ”Marley and Me” and that stunk, save for the dog. But I think it’s been going downward for her for a while. ”The Break-Up” was probably her peak years. I loved her in ”The Good Girl” but I think she’s either wary of those jobs or she’s not good enough of an actress. Either way, her Rachel days gotta end at some point.

      • Heine says:

        I think it’s possible that she’s pregnant but I think she’s just taking a break. She’s been doing movie after movie for a few years and she probably needs a break.

        I’m sure she could still do romcoms if she wanted to; they arent only populated with pretty young things. Diane Keaton has done a couple, Helen Hunt, Jamie Lee Curtis, Sigourney Weaver, Goldie Hawn, Tina Fey, Sandra Bullock, Sarah Jessica Parker.

        I doubt that she’ll ever play a mom, but you never know. And an older female character in a film doesn’t have to be a mother. She might be the bawdy aunt or coworker. Or any number of other things.

        Anyway, I think she’s either taking a break to just take a break (she’s got enough money where she probably never has to work again) or she might be pregnant and taking a break for that reason.

        I guess we’ll know for sure in the coming months.

    • Caz says:

      Yep. Box office takings show she can’t lead a movie. She’s a rotten actress who earns way too much money for her (lack of) talent. She can afford to take time off. Thank goodness. If she’s pregnant and that’s what she wants that’s nice for her. I can’t stand the constant PR around her suggesting that she’s something other than she’s not. She’s ridden Brad & Ange’s coat tails for years now. Time to get her own life.

      • ZenB!tch says:

        Why *does* she get so many roles. That is basically why I can’t stand her (even though I was 100% Team Jen during the break up). She is *forced* down our throats over and over and why. All she does is whine nasally. I really think she killed Gerard Butler’s career.

        On the flip side I don’t “like” AJ. I think she hates other women and has no sense of sisterhood. She’s not a “girly-girl”. She doesn’t have female friends – although I’m starting to wonder if she has any friends.

        Still, I would rather read about AJ and her third world press tour or if forced see one of her films before an Aniston film. At least AJ has some talent.

    • Emma - the JP lover says:

      This (very practical) reason has my vote.

  3. Lucinda says:

    Or maybe because noone is hiring her?

    • patw says:

      okay – her movies make money. make a return on the budget, and then some when you consider DVD sales. She is one of the few female stars who actually delivers on this.
      Why wouldn’t anyone want to hire her?

      • Emma - the JP lover says:

        (Blinks) The only way to tell how well an actor/actress carries a film is to judge the films where they and they alone were the leading stars–’not’ a co-star–of the film. If the actor/actress’s name comes ‘before’ the title of the film, they are the leading star and are expected to carry the film. With this in mind, how many films has Jennifer Aniston actually carried by herself?

  4. mln76 says:

    Could be pregnant, could be on fertility drugs and look pregnant. Could have an empty uterus but trying to drum up attention for what looks like a crappy movie in the midst of Award season. I really have no idea. But Jen-Jen knows how to keep herself in the headlines. RESPECT!

  5. Wendy says:

    So when Jolie announced her first pregnancy during the 2006 awards season, she was trying to steal Clooney’s thunder?

    I guess that Aniston must not have gotten the memo that should she DARE to get pregnant, she’d better check in with Brangelina first and if it’s inconvenient for them, she’ll have to hide it until it doesn’t interfere with their schedule.

    • mln76 says:

      Not even a slighty apt comparison. Angie was never married to George it’s not something that would actually overshadow his Oscar race like an Aniston baby could hypothetically do to Brad. Jen’s the triangle to promote her films. You better believe if she’s expecting she’d Brad’s Oscar bid to promote her bump and if she’s not she’ll still use the speculation to promote her new crappy film.

      • Lucinda says:

        What’s Clooney got to do with Brangelina pregnancies?

      • Wendy says:

        Of course it’s apt, it’s called “stealing the limelight” regardless of who you’re doing it to. It’s called using the Awards season publicity and your pregnancy to focus all of that attention on you and not the people winning the awards. Did Beyonce not do exactly that by unveiling her pregnancy at an awards show? You betcha! So why would Jolie get a free pass for doing the same thing when no one else does?

        At any rate, I’ve said before here that Clooney is, by far, the frontrunner for Best Actor so if Aniston actually is pregnant she’ll be doing to George exactly what Jolie did to George. Can’t get much more apt than that, now can you? Poor guy must really have done something to annoy the women in Pitt’s life if both the girlfriend AND ex-wife steal the spotlight by announcing a pregnancy the years that he wins an Oscar.

      • mln76 says:

        OH PLEASE. Jolie’s pregnancies were big news. Bigger than every pregnany since combined-so in effect it overshadowed every celebrity news story that was happening at the same time including the Oscar race. STILL there was no personal connection to George(except a friendly banter between co-stars). You could pick any Oscar nominee of that year and say it had the same effect on their Oscar chances (absolutely none) and overshadowed them the same amount. Now if Jen were pregnant Brad specifically would be expected to make a statement on it his words would be carefully parsed and publicized in order to elicit the most scandal. You’d have stories of Brad pining away after Jen on every tab cover etc. and even if he were nominated the pregnancy story would be featured in prominence even in the mainstream press.

        EDIT: And the media attention would focus on how great it is that she’s ‘finally happy’ and ‘finally over Brad’ *eyeroll at the stupid press and their outdated views on childless by choice women*

    • Josephina says:


      No,no, no, hon. Angelina was in Haiti when it was discovered and confirmed that she was pregnant and then People magazine has her on a cover shortly after. And it was NOT Oscar season at the time.

      Further proof? Aniston stopping her interview and crying uncontrollably in front of interviewer upon learning from interviewer with Vanity Fair in 2005 re hearing rumors that Anige was pregnant.

      • Wendy says:

        They were in Haiti mid-January 2006. Smack dab in the thick of awards season.

      • Emma - the JP lover says:

        @Wendy … Actually, they were in the Dominican Republic on December 2, 2005 when Angie confirmed to the world that she was pregnant with her and Brad’s first child. That is hardly in the middle of the Awards season.

        And (to add my 2 cents here) Jen acted like a fool when she presented at the 2009 Oscars by stopping in the midst of her lame joke to look helplessly at Brad (which was SO done to enhance her ‘victim’ status), who was seated next to Angie, in the audience. I might add that Angie and Brad smiled encouragingly at the nitwit while she attempted her lame humor.

        Why do you think Brad owes ‘anything’ to Jen or (blinks hard) Justin to the point that he has to hug them and thump them on the back? Do I have to add that Jen had already filed for divorce (on March 23, 2005) before those ‘W’ photos promoting “Mr. and Mrs. Smith” hit the stands or Brad and Angie were photoed together as a couple in Africa, so what in the world does he owe her?

    • Linda says:

      This is absolutely stupid that Jen has to act accordingly because of anything Brangelina does…OMG…she shouldn’t announce the death of her do because it detracts from something Brad or Angelina was doing and NOW whether or not she is or ISN’T preggo’s – her timing should have been better because of the Oscars?!?! Brad’s not about to win an Oscar anyway!!! BTW…if Jen’s news that she is preggos and she royally trumps anything about Brangelina…kuddos to her…

    • deltona lakes says:

      GeorgeClooney? you are really grabbing for straws aren’t you? Even matt Damon said when they were promoting Oceans movie overseas he was shocked that Brad Pitt was more popular than George. I didn’t even know George was up for an Oscar that year.
      I hate to break it to you But George is not as popular as the JP’s in the US.

      Let’s compare apples to apples.

      Also, Johnny lee Miller attended ITLOBAH with his wife Michelle Hicks. They are happily married with a young child.

      When Johnny Lee Miller has been asked about Angie in the past he would say “That was a long time ago and I’m not commenting”. .Not crying to the Ocean in some mens magazine.

    • Bambi says:

      Why are you so obsessed with dragging Angelina into everything Aniston, Wendy? You loonistons really are beyond the pale.

  6. samira677 says:

    I must be missing something because I don’t understand why people think Jennifer is desperate for a baby. Everything about her lifestyle says she doesn’t want a child. Even quitting smoking since a lot of smokers quit several times in their life. Also a film break doesn’t mean anything. She usually films 3 or 4 films in a year, promotes the following year, and has a short break before filming again. I could be wrong but she doesn’t seem like a mother type. Liking and being good with kids has nothing to do with actually raising them.

    • Launicaangelina says:

      Great points.

    • Em says:

      When Brad and Jen split up, all the tabloids said it was because he wanted to start a family and she didn’t (and sexy Angelina and her ever expanding uterus.) The minute the divorce papers go through, all of a sudden every tab has monthly headlines about how baby hungry she is. It’s bizarre.

      • Lolaviestinks says:

        when brad and jen were together, he desperatley told everybody that he wants kids and she said : of course i want kids but not yet. She was 35 at this point and they were already married for 4,5 years. so when they broke up, huvane was affraid that she could loose her fame because they knew angie was pretty soon pregnant after divorcepapers were finished!
        her fans would gave her the responsibility for the break up and that would have been a huge imagedamage! nobody wants to believe that the so called sweet girl next door is just a image she uses and that she realy is a famewhore and loves money!!
        i dont think that shes a bad person in general but its naive to think that shes an angel. she and her camp plan everything around superpowercouple brangelina. were talking about a looooooooooot of money, there is no space for coincedences ;-)

    • Josephina says:

      Because Ansiton SAID she wanted children. I guess you do not remember that Brad/Jen had build a nursery in their house?

      or DURING her divorce, she said regarding children, “I did [want children], I do and I will!”

      or in an Vanity Fair 2005 article, she said, ” I see myself being married with kids in five years…” (paraphrased).

      Her stance changed somewhat when dating John Mayer when she stated ” I was never the type to live in a house with a white picket fence and have children”

      It became apparent then that she does not want to disappoint or face backlash from her minivan mother fans, nor does she want to lose the fans who won’t be satisified until she marries again and have kids.

      I get that she doesn’t want to feel pressured either way.

  7. Shelley says:

    She makes so many movies every year, all the same inane plots, all badly written, maybe they’ve just run out of ways to keep on keeping on recycling the same moldy nonsense.

  8. Camille says:

    I wish she was pregnant. Can you imagine media reaction? It’d be real pandemonium. The ultimate girl next door and her amearican dream comes true.

  9. Evie says:

    I’m so tired of celebrities who use pregnancy to promote their movies. Sad.

    • carrie says:

      but we even don’t know if she’s pregnant

    • Roma says:

      Most actresses work pretty constantly and a baby likes to chill out in the womb for the full 9 months, so almost always there will be cross-over between movie promotions and pregnancy.

      I hope she’s preggo just so JA Womb Watch can come to an end.

      • Naye in VA says:

        Sounds about right. I dont know how a 45 yo woman can PLAN her pregnancy around awards season. be for real. She would have done that all the OTHER times Brad has been nominated for something ya think?

  10. Launicaangelina says:

    Eh… Congrats if she is or isn’t. She’s living her life how she wants and will become a mother whether she wants to or not, either naturally, IVF, adoption, etc. She seems happy.

  11. Marjalane says:

    Something must be wrong with my priorities. I no longer care about Jennifer Annistons womb.

  12. SHump76 says:

    For once, I can actually SEE it being for real. Maybe it’s just because I’m pregnant at the moment, but in some of these pictures she has the look about her. All boobs and rosy round cheeks.

  13. bea says:

    I like your theory!

  14. PHD in Gossip says:

    UK Daily Mail justed posted photos and an article that shows Aniston in skinny jeans yesterday. She decided to refute these rumors.


    • Franny says:

      I was hoping those pictures would be a little more…clear. She’s still wearing a baggy sweater and jacket, so all we see is her skinny calves.

      • Kimlee says:

        From the other photo of her with orlando bloom if she was pregnant it would be showing in the new photos which it not and the sweater is not baggy so I would guess she not pregnant just anorther tab lie.

    • The Original Mia says:

      Eh…can’t really tell anything. Love the boots, though.

  15. Brangeloonie says:

    No way is she pregnant. She is barren.

  16. Bite me says:

    Or maybe she just taking some time off to work on her relationship … I really think she is HAPPY with Justin Hope they last for awhile :)

  17. mln76 says:

    Oh and another thing in October Jen and Justin at the Elle event (where she was wearing her silver dress) were seen arguing over her cigarette smoking and drinking.

    Last night at the Elle Women In Hollywood Tribute, one of my friends, who was also at the dinner reported to me that the couple got into not one, but several heated discussions while their dinner companions pretended not to notice. Drinking (he thought she was/ had been drinking too much. It was tough to hear when this happened or if it was happening then), cigarette breaks,and being marginalized (he thought she was not taking him seriously), plus this was a night when she was being honored.

    So even if she was she definitely isn’t 6 months along like some tabs are claiming. But yes she’ll use the speculation for the press for Wanderlust.

    • Lois says:

      I call bullshit on your ‘friends’ story.

      • mln76 says:

        not MY friend it was a story in CDAN believe it or not. The only point was she was seen drinking in October.

      • NM9005 says:

        Aniston likes her booze and recretaional drugs. Even her friends (hello Chelsea Handler) reflect that. To try and ignore that would be terribly naive but I guess people need to believe in their own convictions to believe she would actually be responsible enough to care for a child. Or be selfless enough for that matter.

    • SHump76 says:

      Not that it means much, but I will be 15 weeks tomorrow. I went out for dinner and drinks on my birthday (October 30) and probably ovulated the next day. If I wear jeans and a sweater like the one she is wearing in that link, you probably wouldn’t think I looked pregnant either.

      That doesn’t prove anything, but I certainly don’t think she looks anywhere NEAR 6 months pregnant. She could easily be 4 months, just starting to show, and have been drinking and smoking in October, though.

      • Josephina says:

        Are you 40 something years old, never gone through a successful pregnancy AND DRINKING AND SMOKING? SMH.

        Actresses that had pregnancies in their late 30s or early 40s, i.e, Marcia Cross, Julianne Moore, Halle Berry, Jennifer Lopez, Madonna, Mariah Carey, etc…. were not seen drinking or smoking while they were pregnant, for a reason.

        We don’t hear about how well her perfume is doing, or the SmartWater ads, or that she is not nominated for her “comedic timing” in any of the last 10-15 movies that she participated. She is not a spokesperson for any shampoo, perfume, clothing, or makeup line and she has alredy admitted that charity is not her thing.

        I do know she sells magazine covers, just not movies. (Any movie that made a lot of money was due to the bigger star or on an ensemble cast, like the Friends TV show.) That makes her more of a celebrity rather than a woman known for her craft of acting. She still gets paid, but I am still left wondering what her true passion is.

        I am starting to think it’s sunbathing.

      • Wendy says:

        Congrats on the upcoming baby!

      • SHump76 says:

        Thanks, Wendy!

        @Josephina: I’m 35, but you miss my point.
        She could easily be 4 months pregnant. If so, she wouldn’t have been pregnant yet for *most* of October. She’d be just starting to show now, and been going out for drinks a week or two before she would have actually been pregnant. I’m not saying that she IS pregnant, just that it’s entirely possible, and no one has come up with anything that definitively proves that she isn’t.

  18. whatevs says:

    that’s what she wants you to think. and months after she announced this she said i’m not preggo. whatevs.

    • patw says:

      it’s already been denied. twice i think. do you want a daily denial? Even if the denials are just putting off her announcement – it’s no one’s business. Having a baby is stressful, but can’t imagine the stress when they live this kind of fish bowl life.

  19. Sarko says:

    According to Celebitchy, Jennifer Aniston must have the gestation cycle of an elephant!
    How often did you guys claim she was pregnant last year?

    • Franny says:

      CB doesn’t ever make the first comment about Jen being pregnant – they just report all of the BS mags/other websites report.

  20. Reel Wheel says:

    yeah? No. Same story as last week, and the week before that, and the week before that, and so on, and so on, and so on. Why do I feel like I am watching that Herbal Essences Commercial from the 80′s?

  21. Cathy says:

    That poor woman can’t win no matter what she does. I hope she is pregnant and announces it just before the Oscars announcements. She doesn’t have to time her life and her maybe pregnancy around rather or not it’s convenient for Brads maybe oscar nomination. If it was anyone else, no one would care when and if they announced a pregnancy. So why should it matter with her.

    • Wendy says:

      +1 to that.

    • mln76 says:

      She doesn’t have to time her life to anyone else…so she should time it to the Oscar races…

      Gotta love the hypocrisy of the Jen posse.


      • Wendy says:

        Gee, maybe she should done something about it as soon as she realized that she would be showing by February and how much that might detract from Pitt’s Oscar night.

        ***massive eyeroll***

        There really is something wrong when you start to see everything Aniston does as part of some sort of anti-Brange plot. She’s probably not even pregnant, but if she is, she’s entitled to annonce it whenever she feels like it. And if she does so at a time that it helps her career, so what? Why shouldn’t she?

      • mln76 says:

        She has a pattern of jumping on her ex’s publicity train. She’ll continue to do it whether or not she’s pregnant. Can I blame her? Maybe not because you know there is only so much consistent hackery can get you in Hollywood.
        But I feel free to calls ‘em like I sees ‘em ;)

        Of course the Jen fans’ defensiveness comes from the fact that in this case us Loonies are right. She’s milking whatever is going on for what it’s worth. She’ll either make an adamant denial on her next appearance getting headlines for Wanderlust(instead of having her rep deny it which wouldn’t get as much press)-or if she is pregnant she’ll drum up the excitement as much as possible making a reveal right around Oscar night just in time to counter Brad’s expected loss to the Cloonster thereby officially ‘winning’ the triangle once and for all.

      • Wendy says:

        Well, after Pitt decided to make a snide remark about “boring” and marriage while promoting his own film, and seeing the subsequent media feeding frenzy, she probably decided that what’s good for the goose is good for the gander.

        That said, if, and it’s a big if, she’s pregnant, I doubt very much that she timed it on the off chance that Pitt would be getting an Oscar. The Academy Awards are not “Brad Pitt Night”, and if she decided to unveil a baby bump at the Oscars, it’s certainly got a lot more to do with it being the Oscars and an internationally televised event than because Pitt will likely be nominated. I have no doubt she’d still do so even if he wasn’t.

        Besides, imagine all the extra screen time Pitt and Jolie would get when they cut to their faces for their reactions over the night. Because obviously, all three of the triangle would be in the spotlight, don’t you think? Not only that, but if Pitt wanted to put an end to the Triangle once and for all, this would be his chance.

        Imagine, caught on camera at the Oscars, Pitt smiling and congratulating Aniston, maybe even giving her a hug, and then shaking Theroux’s hand, clapping him on the back, giving the thumb’s up sign to him. That ‘s all it would take.

      • mln76 says:

        Aniston doesn’t belong at the Oscars. Her fans don’t see how embarrassing it is that a woman whose never even been nominated (and most likely never will be) does her best to make that night about her just like she did in 09. It’s downright tacky. That night should not be about an Aniston/Pitt/Jolie reconciliation but about the actual nominees and winners who did something of merit in film.

      • Tiegan says:

        I gotta ask, is it embarrassing for Tina Fey to go to the Oscars? Scarlett Johansson? Drew Barrymore? Jack Black, Ben Stiller or Will Ferrel?

        Is it ‘tacky’ for Cameron Diaz to go? How about Demi Moore or Sarah Jessica Parker?

        Or is it only embarrassing for the people you personally don’t like?

      • Wendy says:

        @Mln: as a member of the Academy, I’d say she definitely has her place. I’ll bet she voted for Clooney though.

        @Tiegan: very good point.

      • mln76 says:

        I love it when people mention Aniston is an Academy member as if it’s prestigious Taylor Lautner & Miley Cyrus are in the Academy ’nuff said. As for your examples of people attending the Oscars I do think comic actors and young up and comers have their place but I think we all know the Biels, SJPs, and Aniston’s show up for the free press and to feign A-list status. Still it’s not simply that she went to the Oscars that made it embarrassing it’s that she acted a fool on national television giving fuel to the triangle THAT will always put her in the Fameho wall o’ shame.

      • Wendy says:

        So you think that the MEMBERS of the Academy have no business being at their own awards show? That’s a joke, right?

        I also think it’s pretty funny that you think she shouldn’t be there, but you also seem to think that she has so much influence that she can organize it so that the show turns around Aniston and Brangelina, BEFORE she was even a member. Man, that girl must have awesome superpowers to be able to override the wishes of the 3 or 5,000 members, including Jon Voight and possibly Pitt and Jolie, in order to force them to make her a Presenter for a category that one of Jolie’s films was up for. Even better, she had so much influence that she managed to have a camera parked under the Brange’s nostrils to capture their every expression.

        Honestly, if she could pull all of that off before she was a member, then she definitely deserves to be there every single year fom now on. Soon, she’ll be running the thing…

      • Tiegan says:

        I’m not quite sure how she acted a fool. Was it just being in the same room as her ex-husband when asked to present an award? Was Jonny Lee Miller an embarrassment when he showed up at the ITLOBAH premier last month?

        Everyone goes to those awards shows for publicy for their movie projects, if they didn’t it would be a few dozen people giving each other high fives in an empty Kodak theatre and absolutely nobody would watch.

        And Jennifer Aniston is an A-list actress, even if she’s not you’re cup of tea.

      • Heine says:

        Mln76: ‘She’ll either make an adamant denial on her next appearance getting headlines for Wanderlust(instead of having her rep deny it which wouldn’t get as much press)…’

        Actually, already been denied by a rep to Gossip Cop. The rep said that the story was ‘wrong on both counts.’

        And I think Cathy was being facetious when she said she hoped Aniston would announce it around the Oscars. It shouldn’t matter when someone announces their pregnancy. It only matters to Brangeloonies because she might be stealing some attention from your favorites.

      • Kara Ann says:

        Hey Min :) ,

        Just wanted to chime in. I know that AJ fans think that Jennifer plans everything around the Brange but don’t you think the idea the she would time a pregnancy is going just a little too far? The woman is over 40 and IF she is trying to conceive I imagine that the last thing she is worried about is the schedule of her ex-husband and his partner. Isn’t possible that she is just getting on with her life (with or w/o a baby)? It’s like some people want her to plan her life according to the Brange so they can ridicule her for it. If she wanted, I’m sure she could have been papped over the last couple of months and yet we’ve seen very little of her. I would think that would make non-fans glad. Instead any little tabloid tidbit (i.e. justin didn’t propose, jen might be pg) seems to justify saying that she and the omnipresent Huvane planted those stories to upstage Brange. I mean, c’mon, it just doesn’t make sense anymore for her to do it or for us to believe it.
        Lastly, I don’t know why she shouldn’t go to the Oscars. She wants to promote something and the telecast needs ratings. I think that that is all there is to that. Plenty of actors/actresses do that. It is hardly her fault if her ex and partner are going to be there. BFD, really. Tons of exes and whatevers will probably be in that room and the only one that gets made such a big deal about is these people. Despite what is intimated here, she has as much right to breathe and to continue her life as they do and that includes attending ceremonies that she is invited to attend.
        Anyway, enjoy your comments. One time you posted about how everyone should stay out of Aniston’s womb. You said it much better than I just put it. It was a great sentiment and well put.

      • mln76 says:

        Just to clarify I’m NOT talking about timing the pregnancy. I’M TALKING ABOUT TIMING AN ANNOUNCEMENT those are 2 different things ;)

      • Wendy says:

        @Mln: she can time it however it suits her best. If it gives a boost to her career or film, so what? Is that supposed to be a problem? That’s the name of the game in HW, isn’t it? She doesn’t owe Pitt a thing, nor does she answer to him or his fans or Jolie’s fans as to when she would share that information.

      • mln76 says:

        Ok I admit I was wrong about Lautner being a member but isn’t it hilarious that Aniston admits that she can’t even get parts she auditions for but she was invited to the Academy? A person who couldn’t even get Scorsese or Weinstien on the phone is supposed to decide which one gets an Oscar TALK ABOUT HOLLYWEIRD.

        No one can tell me that her appearance at the 09 Oscars wasn’t a publicity stunt on the part of the Academy and Aniston. THAT along with her jokes about the Jolie-Pitt children during that same Marley and Me campaign turned me into a card carrying Brangeloonie.

      • patw says:

        mln- come on. You don’t think Pitt or Jolie is guilty of that? Please. Get off your high horse. At the end of the day – the split boosted ALL their profiles. Jolie was not even a fraction as famous as she is now before the Pitt coupling? Ditto for Pitt.

        And if this is the reason you are a card carrying ‘brangeloon’ then it speaks volumes…

    • Cirque28 says:

      Re: That poor woman can’t win no matter what she does.

      Can’t win?? Her entire life is one humongous win. The same goes for Brad, Angelina, and even Justin. They all have beauty, good health, freedom, and wealth beyond our wildest dreams. They’re all most definitely winning.

      But I agree that no one has to time any pregnancies around anyone else. “No, honey, we have to wait until next month, because if I got pregnant, then I’d start to show around the time that Brad might get an Oscar and how unfair would that be to poor Brad and Angelina who can’t win no matter what they do?”

      Team Let’s Keep a Little Perspective Here.

    • Wendy says:

      Thanks for that link about Academy membership. Funny they specifically mention that Lautner is NOT a member. Also funny they mention Clooney and Aniston as being members, but no word of the two other sides of the triangle.

  22. Franny says:

    I would love if it went down like that. It would be the best 6 months of gossip EVER (well, since the split that was heard around the world).

    • NM9005 says:

      I don’t believe yet she’s pregnant (nor do I think she ever wants to be) but it would be good for gossip (two splits already and a pregnancy announcement, 2012 “rocks”). It’s not even that Aniston is remotely interesting as a celeb or actress but it’s for the purpose of the triangle and “haters” and “fans” battling it out (can you imagine: “see Aniston did want to have a child!”). :D Ah the fighting will continue forever! And that DM article proves nothing so far. Baggy sweater, yeah, not really conclusive is it? Well, Aniston keeps them talking, that’s for sure.

  23. Agnes says:

    omg, less insipid rom-coms for a while. thank god.

  24. hstl1 says:

    I think she might be. Molly Sims just announced her pregnancy and given the fact that she is 17 weeks, she had to be pregnant while shooting her January Shape magazine cover. And she looked like she has a rockin’ body.

    As for Aniston, she could still wear skinny jeans if she is 4 weeks(or so) pregnant!!

    • SHump76 says:

      I’m still wearing mine at almost 4 months! Those aren’t skinny jeans, anyway. They’re straight leg. There are all kinds of extenders to make it so that you can keep wearing your own jeans for months after they stop closing on their own.

  25. serena says:

    I hope not, just because I have enough of her womb situation now..figures if she is really pregnant.
    Every damn magazine will be filled with her pity-party baby story…that would be awful. So, fingers crossed!

  26. Shay Kay says:

    IF she is pregnant than she will be the one to announce it before a huge baby bump gives the game away. She’s said before, commenting on all the womb attention, that IF she were to be pregnant that she would control the release of the information. She can’t stop the speculation and as this has been going on FOREVER I’m sure she wouldn’t have to announce soon as most people would feel like I do which is SHE’S NOT PREGNANT UNLESS SHE SAYS SO.

  27. lilly says:

    Yay! I do so hope it is true and that she has a healthy baby. It would be nice if a couple actually got to make an announcement themselves as opposed to the “rumor mill” speculating.

  28. Jackie says:

    i have a feeling she is pregnant this time. it would be very much like her to time this for the release of her movie and oscars.

  29. irishserra says:

    Do you wonder if the celebrities sit around laughing hysterically at us “ordinary folk” and our constant speculation over their lives, as opposed to really living ours?…

    … Nah. Never mind. They are all attention whores. It’s why they’re in Hollywood in the first place, right?

  30. Valerie says:

    The stories we make up and the stories the tabloids make up indicate a lot about what we want for ourselves, what we think of celebrities (and our culture) or how we think women should be. My take is that if they are so in love, you would think that they would wait at least a year, to see if the relationship is steady and strong, before committing to having a child. However, I know some older couples who have been wanting children for a long time that when they finally find the right partner, they do it right away. Then again, these two are wealthy celebrities, and they both seem quite ego-driven, so I can believe this theory about the timing with the Oscars.

  31. Amy says:

    Justin looks like Zachary Quinto in that header picture…am I nuts for thinking that?

    • the original bellaluna says:

      Naw; but he doesn’t have ZQ’s “code red man down” eyebrow situation going on. :)

  32. Gossip PHD says:

    Hello! She Is Not Pregant. No Siree!

  33. Dusty says:

    Pictures on the daily mail from the weekend show a very unpregnant JA today’s edition online.

    • SHump76 says:

      Like I said earlier, those pictures don’t mean much. I look similar in jeans and a sweater right now, And I’ll be 15 weeks pregnant on Wednesday. Some outfits make me look REALLY pregnant, and some make me look like I’m not showing at all.

  34. Alaina says:

    I’d forgotten how awful that metallic dress was.

  35. Susan says:

    Much as it would be great for gossip if Jen would show up pregnant for the awards. Jen just doesn’t seem to care anymore about the hollywood game. If she did she would have been at the globes – you know she was asked. she seems to really want out of the crazy hollywood life. Good for her. Now if only the tabs and blogs can get the message.

    • Kimlee says:

      I think she still cares about the hollywood game if she didn’t she would have did so many photo op when they first got together or gone and still going to all they parties getting press. What I do think is happening is that she wants to change from the image she and her people have created for her over the many years. Instead of being seen as the poor little goody to shoes girl next store she was to be seen as a strong independent  woman and if she and Reese Witherspoon have the same PR person it makes even more sense because they both are trying to change their image at the same time and i think they close in age. I mean  who whant to be a 40 something girl next store that a label for younger girls and I think they are realizing that and that it’s not bankable anymore.

      • mln76 says:

        What I think is hilarious is that Reese seems to want to co-opt Jen’s old image that she’s in the process of shedding. Hollywood is a trip.

      • patw says:

        how was that a photo-op? it’s them walking in New York. You think Aniston has to call the paps? No way – she makes money for them – no matter what she is doing.

  36. Julie says:

    She would not rewrite textbooks, but getting preg in your 40′s, particularly mid to later 40′s is not that easy common without help.

  37. Jules says:

    I think she will be 43 next month, so I hope she is pregnant. Hopefully it will put a stop to all of the stupid movies she has made in the last few years.

  38. Dusty says:

    I think she is taking a break from work because truth is she has no offers.

  39. Dee Cee says:

    I think she is taking time to have fun, chill and see if she wants to start a night club singing career, which she wanted to do a few years back.. it’s not like her movies are blockbusters..

  40. Neelyo says:

    Who cares why she’s taking a break, let’s just enjoy the silence!

    • Dusty says:

      I agree!

      • Lolaviestinks says:

        i also totaly agree!!!!!
        thats soooo deperate!!! she is a joke!

        i think she just dont get a job! who wants to see her anymore? shes 43 and her roles dont fit to a 43 year old woman. Her face stoped to movie since 2005, she cant act !

      • Wendy says:

        And yet her films outgrossed Pitt’s in 2011. I’m pretty sure that she’s not hurting for offers, she consistently brings in profits, whether you want to admit it or not.

      • Josephina says:


        And yet, making more money in a single year has not diminished one drop of worldwide mega-star power that Pitt has maintained in 2011 as well as over a decade.

        Aniston has recently admitted that she has lost almost all the roles that she wanted to get.

        Unlike Aniston, Pitt STARRED in the Tree of Life, which was in limited release in teh U.S., which has received numerous awards and Moneyball, which is getting almost equal critical acclaim attention.

        A true artist not only wants to make money, but hopes that their work leaves a lasting memory and a remarkable impression with the viewers. Furthermore, Brad has repeatedly stated and kept away from blockbuster hit movies because he has pursued a variety of interesting, quality film roles and steered away from being typecasted for one role only, the way Aniston has allowed her career to unfold.

      • Wendy says:

        Josephina, I don’t think that women get the same palette of options in HW. Which is a very good reason for the smarter ones to start their own production companies.

      • lilly says:

        Yeah right, Brad’s movies rule..not. Benjamin Button was horrible, oh yeah, that’s when Jennifer had the smash hit Marley & Me which critics actually liked..alot. The last good flick the Pitts had was Thelma & Louise before he saturated us with bad movies and got so self-absorbed.

      • Josephina says:


        Jen started her production company in 2006/2007? What exactly has she produced/directed?

        The Switch?
        Love Happens?

        I know she produced Mismanagement and that did not turn out well.

        Again, when she is cast as lead actress, the movie does not do well. She cannot carry a movie on her own like other actresses.

        And she has not had the success nor any remarkability with her production company as her peers such as Sandra Bullock (Miss Congeniality.)

        In the movies that made money, she was not known to steal any scenes or dominate the screen in any way.

        She is still best known for Rachel because that was the best character that she played… even til now.

      • Bambi says:

        For pete sake Wendy will you please stop dragging Pitt and Jolie into the discussion? You are obsessed and need help.

    • Eve says:

      @ Neelyo:


  41. Original Chloe says:

    I think her clothing line – if based on her own choices – would earn her a lot of money, lots of women like the way she dresses. It would, on the other hand, be a step away from the kind of career she’s tried to work on in the last years.

    I think she should wait for a good TV role, something comedy-related, something she’s good at.

    I don’t believe the pregnancy. I don’t think Theroux wants to be a daddy just yet.

    • Wendy says:

      I agree that she’d probably make good money at it. The thing about Aniston, and I’ve noticed this about her career, her endorsement choices and even her charity choices, is that she doesn’t do the high end glamour projects.

      From a sheer business and career point of view, this is probably a wise strategy. She may not have the same “highs” as someone like Jolie, but she will almost certainly have a much longer career because her image is easier to morph into something older, and comedy isn’t quite so looks based. As opposed to action figure/ beautiful face/hot woman with a gun who kicks butt.

      She has her own perfume. It’s in the reasonable price range, people seem to like the scent. She might not be making a ton of money off of each bottle, but you only have to look at someone like Elizabeth Taylor and her “White Diamonds” to see that if something catches on, it’s a regular long term money maker, and on something that both creates loyalty and needs to be replenished. Smartwater is another example. It’s not glamourous, but if you’re a bottled water drinker, you buy a case or two of it a week.

      I think if she does clothes, she’d definitely go the jeans, casual route and then I’m guessing she might find a talented shoes designer and a talented bag designer and start up an offshoot of that. This is a woman who loves her shoes and purses. But I think she’d aim to keep it all in the affordable price range.

      It may not sound as prestigious, but those are the sorts of things that ride out any kind of economy. While it may be more bragworthy to own “Fouquets” on the Champs Elysees in Paris, the McDonalds across the street is making way more money with way less hassle. In other words, if you’re smart and just starting out, build your base on the lower end and then branch out further up. I think Aniston understood this a long time ago.

  42. Jaime says:

    Eh, I started disliking (never got hating a celeb) Aniston after Lainey pointed out that her dog died a while ago before her publicist Stephen Huvane announced it to People the day of Brad’s movie premiere the Tree of Life at Cannes. Lainey’s pointed that out that Aniston seems to release info on big events for Jolie/Pitt. Used to think all the bloggers and Lainey were paranoid, but there are only so many coincidences before it becomes suspicious…Like she had her perfume launch the day one of Angelina’s movies premiered. I wouldn’t put it past Jennifer to show up at the Academy Awards preggo.

    • Lolaviestinks says:

      i totaly agree!!!

    • Wendy says:

      I think they do it to each other. There was more than once when Jolie announced something or another right before an Aniston premiere. Or arranges to be on a magazine cover like Vogue for no reason the same month Aniston is on a bunch of others because she’s got something coming out.

      I’m still on the fence on whether “keeping each other relevant via The Triangle” wasn’t in fact one of the divorce clauses.

  43. Gossip PHD says:

    @ Jaime -

    And if Jennifer can’t get herself pregnant, she can go the pillow pregnancy route made popular by Beyonce.

  44. Jess says:

    She can’t be pregnant becuz men can’t get pregnant. Does anyone else notice how masculine her face looks in these pictures? Jennifer isn’t ugly but she isn’t an attractive looking woman either. How does she get on any hottest lists the media loves to create. She isn’t the only one There are several other actresses and models that they proclaim to be so beautiful. Reese Wither spoon Gisele and Jennifer Garner to be included all either ugly or average woman.

    • Paloma says:

      Totally agree about Reese, Jennifer G, and Gisele.

    • lilly says:

      She was married to Brad Pitt in his prime, dated John Mayer and a bevy of hot men. Obviously not everyone finds her unattractive.

      • Julia says:

        No offence, but John Mayer, hot or not is notoriously known for bragging on his blog about how he loves peeing on his women and saying publicly that he only dates STUPID women.

        So it’s not a badge of honour to mention his name, especially since Aniston, the oldest one he dates and the one he compared to an old woman stuck in 1998 was also the stupider one from the bunch to date him twice after an infamous street conference where he made sure the world knows that he dumped her.

        Just sayin…

  45. dede says:

    gossipcop says her rep told them these rumors are not true..please leave her uterus alone, idk why you all are so desparate for this woman to get pregnant

  46. lisa says:

    there are new pictures of them out and about. She doesn’t look pregnant, but who knows every woman carries differently.

  47. Paloma says:

    Just googled Oscar date, which is February 2012. Is she a presenter? It is likely we will not see her at all. My conspiracy theory: She really could be pregnant; thus, the “taking time off” statement, or: Taking time off statement to start conspiracy theories; thus keeping her in the news. I personally thought she looked pregnant in the Orlando Bloom picture. The pics in UK Daily Mail are inconclusive.

  48. Poor Earth says:

    this woman is so ugly and mediocre i absolutely cant understand her fame. this is only possible in the usa. a nation that is uneducated and brainwashed!

  49. Julia says:

    She dropped the cigarettes, eased on the chicken salad to share ‘normal’ meals with Theroux and doesn’t exercise as much as sher used to, spending that time with her beau.

    She is just becoming slowly but surely her natural chubby self again, with the tummy pouch she often sports during those times when she isn’t up in arms with her dieting, exercising routine.

  50. Rita says:

    The story I heard was Brad is Jen’s baby daddy and Angelina wants to be her OBGYN.

    There was also something about Jen protesting the wearing of fur at a Seal concert….she might be a bit confused on that one.

  51. mia girl says:

    I dont think those Daily Mail pictures prove anything in either direction. That baggy sweater and coat actually beg for more speculation.

  52. the original bellaluna says:

    When I consistently see Jen in something that looks like she’s DELIBERATELY trying to hide a pregnancy (think Jess), I’ll believe it.

    If she is, congrats!

    • Ida says:

      You need to post more often lady! :) When I first started checking out this website your posts always cracked me up.x

  53. Kim says:

    For some reason I see this guy as a bit controlling & jealous. I could see him telling Jen to take break to start family simply because he wants her to stop working while he works more/gets more famous.

  54. skuddles says:

    Yeesh, so much non-news where Aniston is concerned. She puts on a few pounds and suddenly she’s 6 months pregnant?? All this speculation about her uterus is getting really old.. she needs to do something interesting already.

  55. Camille (The original) says:

    Well her nose was certainly looking pregnant (ie: it was looking huge and more like her old nose) in those photos the other week with her BF and Orlando Bloom, so yeah I could buy your theory Kaiser, it is certainly plausible.
    I don’t see JA and her BF lasting forever though. Something about them seems…off.

    • Reel Wheel says:


    • Camille (The original) says:

      Thanks ;) .

      Oh, and its only my opinion and I don’t care whether any one agrees with me or not. :D

      • Carmen says:

        Her nose is fine, but your spelling isn’t. Just in case you care, anyone is one word and it’s as in “it is” as opposed to its. I’m a teacher who can’t help noticing errors..especially from someone who hates on Jen!

      • Camille (The original) says:

        Carmen- you’re right about something, I don’t care what you think or say ;) .
        I hear there are plenty of fan sites for fans of various celebs. Bashing/attacking other posters isn’t allowed here.

        Have a nice day! :)

        (People are all allowed an opinion on this blog, if you don’t like what I have to say- just skim past my comments, I will be doing so with yours :) ).

  56. Julie says:

    lol why does everybody slowly transition brad pitt into the topic of something aniston related?

    • TheOriginalKitten says:

      “Slowly”? You must be new. If The Triangle isn’t the subject of any JA/BP/AJ post then it’s guaranteed to be brought up by the second comment (latest). It’s exhausting.

    • Shannon says:

      Because it has to. It’s like the Godwin’s Law of A-list gossip. You know reasonable conversation is over when someone brings up the Jen/Brad/Angie trifecta.

  57. truthful says:

    she could be taking off to begin concentrating on getting pregnant or fertility treatments.

    whatever it is, she looks happy and deserves it.

    I’d love to see Kaiser’s prediction of events come true–I’d be soo tickled.
    she looks happy as heck though, good for her.

  58. Shannon says:

    I don’t buy it. It’s not that easy to get pregnant at 42. The odds of conceiving in a given month are less than 5%. Certainly it’s possible, but I doubt she’s actively trying to get pregnant and the chances of an “oops” are quite low.

    Now taking a break to relax and do IVF treatments I could understand, but she’s never seemed terribly interested in kids so I don’t see her suddenly changing her mind and trying really hard before time runs out.

    • Mari says:

      True, spexially if it is your first pregnancy or never carried to term.
      After you have one, it somehow becomes easier to get preg. And carry it to term. She cannot just “time it”. She has all the money in the world in a profession that pays ridiculous salaries. She is noones victim, but she sure likes to have America’s compassion. With all that privilege, if whe wanted a child, she would have one by now. Surrogates, adoption, etc. She doesnt even need to ruin her body.
      I doubt she is preg. Or wanting to be. If she is she is almost as insensitive as AJ, having a baby so soon in a relationship that started like that? uncool.

  59. Lauren says:

    How come Jen is not romping around in Cabo with an itty bitty bikini? She is hiding. If she is preggo, I am happy for her.

    • Wendy says:

      You know, I put the ski trip down to doing something different with her new guy. But thinking about it… maybe you have something there. Much easier to hide a baby bump in ski clothes than an itty bitty bikini.

      • Guest says:

        she went to Hawaii in August and wasnt wearing a bikini..i guess she was pregnant then which puts her at 5 months now lol..her rep told gossip cop she wasnt preggers she was out skiing and drinking wine..i feel bad for her because you all wont stay out of her uterus, so much pressure to get pregnant

      • Wendy says:

        No pressure. Simply she’s said in the past she’d like to have kids, so if she is pregnant, good for her! If she’s not and she’s happy that way, good for her!

  60. Shannon says:

    Gah I swear I hit reply and half the time it doesn’t nest my comment o.O

  61. Penguin says:

    @ Shannon – my aunt had her kids at 40, 42 & 44 without any ivf and my uncle had, had chemo too. Women in their forties can get pregnant without help it does happen. My great, great grandmother had a baby at 49.

    • Shannon says:

      Oh I know that, it’s just that the odds are much lower once you hit 40 statistically speaking. Egg quality just isn’t as high. It’s difficult, but not impossible. And of course some women have healthy fresh eggs even in their 60′s. But that’s rare. If a woman knows she wants kids, waiting to start a family until her 40′s is a gamble.

  62. Priscilla says:

    I hope that she is pregnant and engaged and happy about the future. And that all of her haters go screaming into the night when they find out, lol.

  63. pin_doctor says:

    I bet she’s taking time off to acquaint herself with her new fur baby that she’s supposedly adopting from Utah.

    I’m glad she’s taking some time off from making mediocre movies!

  64. Jill says:

    The girl is not preggers. Like some of the above posts, saw pic of her over the weekend and very slim. The media is so obsessed with her. Chill out eager web sites, when and if she is with child, you’ll know when you see her pushing the buggy! 43 yrs old for first child seems very risky to me, but then again I was 25 with my daughter and everyone said I should wait. Grandma isn’t much older than Jennifer!

  65. aprayerforthewildatheart says:

    Conspiracy theories aside Beyonce wore skinny type jeans at what, eight months? I think that Jen does feel Justin is ‘the one’. I have never seen her throw herself into a relationship like she has with JT. If having a child is what she wants I can totally see her doing it with JT. This relationship seems totally different than any of the others she’s had, she’s always been very in ‘control’ mode in the past. On another note she’s in very good physical shape so I see no reason why she couldn’t have kids naturally. I’m not a fan but I don’t dislike her, don’t really get the hate, and am sick of the “Unholy Triangle”, they’ve all moved on.

    • Julie says:

      I agree with you 100%, well 98% because I am a fan of Jen.

    • hatekyle says:

      I don’t believe that she “feels justin is the one.” Rather she thinks justin may be her last chance. Desperate times.

    • lisa says:

      I saw a clip of her on that Handlers show. not sure when that was taped, but she does not look pregnant on that show.

      She ahs been with Justin for not quiet a year. People are forever talking about her having a child. but nobody ever says if Justin wants one. He was in long term relationship and had no kids. I don’t know much of anything about the man. I don’t know if he has ever talked about a family/Children.

      But if she is pregnant we’ll know soon. She and her are starting to be seen more. Plus she start promoting soon. It will be interesting how they do it. All the things that were in place for the movie promotion kind of went haywire after the film was pushed back to February. All the promoting she did was to flow into that. But it didn’t happen. So not sure what she and he will bring to the table to get buzz about the film

      fun to see how it goes.

  66. Penguin says:

    I’m 29 in may and maybe thinking of waiting 5 yrs or so. Been in disastrous relationships up until 3 yrs ago when I met my fiancé. We’d both really like to go travelling for a bit but I read comments on here and in the media that make me think we shouldn’t put off trying for a baby. Wouldn’t like to assume I’ve got loads of time when maybe i haven’t. It’s difficult to know what to do for the best really.

  67. Jenn says:

    People, there were just photos taken of her and Justin coming out of a movie theatre over the weekend, her stomach is as flat is it usually is. Brad and Angelina are happy. Jen and Justin are happy. The only ones that are not happy are the whacko fans who act like they know these people. GET A LIFE FOLKS!

  68. bohemelilene says:

    Justin looks so good in that first pic :)

  69. Dredz says:

    Yes, anything to rain on Brad and Angelina’s Oscar parade

    • patw says:

      yes. Because she planned the tabloids discussing phantom baby bumps and wearing of coats certain ways and broken engagements with just two shots of her in the last month and a half. Such a devious master manipulator, she is!

      She’s been keeping a low profile. What exactly do you want her to do – show up every day on the cover and then disappear completely in February?

  70. CHRISTIAN_GIRL says:

    She does not look pregnant.

    No announcement can diminish Brad being nominated for his 3rd Oscar. Get real. Of ALL the male performances this past year, he will be in the top 5 in all the awards available. Yeah, he is a winner. BTW, Clooney has NOT won yet, so there’s that.

    Stop trying to make this some sort of competion. IT IS NOT. She is doing her thing and Brad and Angie are doing theirs. They are not on the same career path other than all actors, but certainly different roles/types. She can’t compete with them and they don’t care to compete with her. Think about it, which roles were they fighting over? See, NONE.

    As for the 1 man in question, we also see how that turned out. Stop insulting her, by bringing up her ex. He is just that, her ex. They are divorced, severed ALL ties and moved on.

    Don’t make her having a baby another competition. Brad has 6. Who can catch up to that and probably no one would want too. Angie bore him 3 and the time is closing in on Jen being able to do that either. Does she even want that many. AJ is 36 with plenty more time for even more births. Again, no competition.

    These are all adults here who have real lives outside of acting in films. Tabs seem to forget that, but we should not.

  71. jilly says:

    My vote: She is most decidedly NOT pregnant. But she and Huvane appreciate the publicity value of pretending constantly that she either is or might be open to joining the mini-van brigade. Truth is that she has had a series of failed relationships and she is taking time-off to make sure that this one works. She loves Justin and she wants to keep him. It’s really that simple.

    • patw says:

      She’s not obligated to refute/confirm every tabloid story so that people can stop driving themselves crazy speculating. She’s not beholden to the public about her private life.

      All because she wore a coat a certain way… gah. CRAZY.

      • micha says:

        If anyone has really seen pics of Jen, she always wears her purse across her chest when she goes out. That is why her coat bumped out looking like she was pregnant. She had her purse under her coat.

  72. micha says:

    that is why we are so screwed in this world. We have people that have nothing better to do then comment on “fake” facts that the media puts out to sell mags. If these people put this much effort and time into politics and making out world better…damn. We could actually get somewhere, but no, let’s worry about what rich people like Ange and Jen are doing.

  73. aud says:

    I think she’s just bloated.

  74. Susan says:

    All I can say is WOW – probably not pregnant and it makes almost 200 comments!. Nobody and I mean nobody is as interesting as Jen even when she is not seen for months at a time. Oh and MLN76 – you really need some therapy.

  75. anom says:

    jen is not interesting. what she is, is a fame-whore who, with the aid of her well-paid publicist, knows how to work the media and her long-suffering fans with a made-up competition that only exists in anistonville.

  76. d says:

    IDK…Justin T doesn’t seem the fatherly type. Totally don’t get that vibe. And I don’t see that role really working for him, career-wise. I think they’re contentedly single, but together.

  77. dee says:

    Why oh why do we as “regular folks” want to argue with total strangers on a comment blog about people we don’t now. Come on we could do better. Love you all.

  78. Xantha says:

    People magazine just posted a story that at a recent dinner Jennifer ordered a dirty martini. Would she still be drinking such drinks if she were pregnant? I’m guessing no, so she’s not.

  79. Kelly says:

    Maybe if she’s pregnant she’ll put on some clothes….scary to see what her “clothing line” would look like…whore clothes for women in their 40s trying to act 20. Justin is not even good looking; can’t wait till he goes bald, and she is so annyoying.

  80. BELLA says:


  81. Amanda says:

    I hope she’s pregnant so that she will stop making crummy movies, at least for the next few years.

  82. Aldo Allmon says:

    Thanks for the blog post. Keep writing.

  83. Great post.Much thanks again. Awesome.

  84. Bria Perry says:

    Thank you ever so for you blog post.Really thank you! Fantastic.