Brad Pitt announces plans to produce an epic Marilyn Monroe bio-pic: good idea?

I remember hearing something about Naomi Watts playing Marilyn Monroe months (years?) ago. I never realized that the Monroe project that Watts was attached to was a film adaptation of Joyce Carol Oates’ Blonde. I read Blonde several years ago, and while I was blown away by Oates’ take on Marilyn, the book is incredibly dark and the portrait of Marilyn is that of a very tortured, confused, mentally deficient woman. I’m just saying – the book (at 700 pages) doesn’t lend itself to easy adaptation, and even if you manage to wrangle a decent script, who would you even get to play this dark version of Marilyn? Well, Brad Pitt is up the task. I mean, Brad’s not going to play Marilyn, but he has signed on to produce the thing:

Marilyn Monroe has been everywhere lately, from the fictitious musical on “Smash” to the 2011 Michelle Williams movie… But she could be getting another treatment if Brad Pitt and Andrew Dominik have anything to say about it.

The A-list actor has come aboard to produce the filmmaker’s long-gestating drama about the blond bombshell. “We’re going to get this one done,” Pitt told 24 Frames in a joint interview with Dominik. Pitt said it’s unclear whether he would take a role in the movie as well (suggestions welcome on who he should play) or simply produce. Pitt’s been on a bit of a producing hot streak lately: His company, Plan B, was behind two best picture nominees in 2012 (“The Tree of Life” and “Moneyball”).

Pitt and Domink collaborated on “The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford” and the upcoming hit-man movie “Killing Them Softly.” “Blonde” would mark a shift from those hard-boiled genres; it would look at an imagined inner life of the iconic actress, an inner life first imagined by Joyce Carol Oates, who wrote an acclaimed 2000 novel on which the film would be based.

Oates’ “Blonde,” which also got the TV mini-series treatment a decade ago, has been in feature development since at least 2009, when Dominik began writing a script based on the book. Soon after, the foreign-sales company Wild Bunch began peddling the project. But it’s back on the front burner thanks to Pitt’s interest and to some new financing possibilities. Dominik wouldn’t comment on the specific progress of the project, but said that shooting it in January or February of 2013 was not out of the realm of possibility.

When it was first incarnated with Wild Bunch, Naomi Watts was slated to play the lead part of Marilyn. But that was a long time ago, and it’s unclear at this point if the filmmakers would continue in that direction.

It should be noted that “My Week With Marilyn” was hardly a blockbuster performer: It grossed $14 million and garnered mediocre reviews. But that film covered only a small slice of the actress’ life. And, in any event, expect a different kind of film from the Australia-based Dominik, who departed from convention with both “Jesse James” (a non-Western Western) and “Killing Them Softly” (which turns the hit-man movie into a meditation on capitalism). Meanwhile, interest in Monroe continues to grow with the 50th anniversary of her death approaching on Aug. 5.

Since coming on the scene with his cult hit “Chopper” in 2000, Dominik hasn’t exactly worked at a feverish pace. He took seven years to make “Jesse James” and five for “Killing.” “He’s got a terrible habit for writing things on spec,” Pitt said with a good-natured smile, implying that the rights issues on “Blonde” may have bogged it down too. (Dominik wrote his first draft on spec, that is, without locking down rights.)

But Pitt’s brand of surfer-boy intellectual and Dominik’s auteur intensity clearly combine for a kind of chemistry, with both of their collaborations yielding solid reviews. Pitt said that “I think ‘Jesse’ is going to be the film I’m most proud of when I’m done with this [acting] thing.”

Frustrated by the meager box-office for “James,” Dominik hopes that “Killing,” which hits theaters in September as a Weinstein Co. release, rekindles the industry’s interest in the pair’s work.

“I wanted to make a $15-million movie. I wanted to make a movie that was cheap and could make its money back, because I’d like to keep working with Brad and I’d like us to have more expensive playdates than the last one,” he said. “I would like to make someone some money.”

Generally, he said, he struggles with the balance between passion and pragmatism, which he said may be why he’s made just two movies since “Chopper.”

“I’d like to make movies, man,” he said. “But I don’t want to just make movies. I want to make the movies I want to make.”

[From The Los Angeles Times]

Brad has turned into one of the most interesting producers out there – he’s not just looking to produce the films he acts in (although he does that too). He’s shown a real interest in up-and-coming talents and working with “difficult” directors and “difficult” source material that others often avoid. While I think that Hollywood should just let Marilyn rest in peace (instead of trotting her out every year on the cover of Vanity Fair), if you’re going to do a real Marilyn bio-pic using Blonde as the source material, I might be interested. Of course, I really didn’t think Michelle Williams’ Monroe was all that special or award-worthy, so the Marilyn mantle is still up for grabs. Somebody tell Lindsay Lohan to sit down.

Conspiracy theory: a few years ago, there was a rumor that Angelina Jolie might play Marilyn in some other film. I wonder if Brad would be interested in producing another film for his fiancée? Hmm…

Photos courtesy of WENN.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

60 Responses to “Brad Pitt announces plans to produce an epic Marilyn Monroe bio-pic: good idea?”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. cmc says:

    I’m sorry, I have Marilyn Monroe exhaustion. I have no interest in seeing anything else about her life, ever. Or at least, not in the next 10 years. Let the woman rest in peace. And I say that as a borderline-Brangeloonie…not even a Pitt-produced, Jolie-starring MM film will get me in the theater.

    • Esmom says:

      I’m with you. And if you’d been anywhere near Chicago you would have rolled your eyes at the gigantic Marilyn statue that was downtown for a while. Talk about overkill. It was hideous.

    • beyonce's bump says:

      Hello Cmc! I absofrigginlutely agree with you on every point. I am a huge fan but I still do NOT want any more glamorization of Monroe! Yes, she was an Icon, Yes, she was a beauty, Yes, she was misunderstood, Yes, she was a victim to the effects of fame, like we GET IT. How many more movies can they make with the same theme? Please. Just No.

    • Carrie says:

      +1

    • Emma says:

      + 2

    • Otterette says:

      Even if Brad played her?? I think that’s the change-up we’ve all been waiting for, in this insufferable sea of Marilyn-overkill…

  2. lucy2 says:

    Sorry, between Smash and the recent movie, I’m all Marilyn’d out. Especially if this is on source material that was already used 10 years ago.

  3. Ell says:

    Too much MM for me, but people will probably watch it.

    Personally I’d like to watch a movie about a lesser star who lead a fascinating life.

  4. DailyNightly says:

    No way Angelina could play Marilyn, the shape of her face is all wrong, but if Lohan can be (mis)cast as Elizabeth Taylor(shudder) maybe Bosworth can pull off this one.

    • Shrubee says:

      I think Leighton meester has the same features as Marilyn all she needs is a voluminous blonde wig

  5. Bubbling says:

    another day, another irrelevant Monroe bio-epic…

  6. Kim says:

    They need unknown actress IMO I just read on deadline.com about the cast for Pitt produced Twelve Year A Slave impressive cast

    • Launicaangelina says:

      I agree with the sentiment – I’m just not that intrigued with Marilyn Monroe but I never really was to start with. But if they move forward, casting an unknown would be best because I can’t imagine scrawny Angelina Jolie playing the role.

      • Kimlee says:

        There is NO talk of Angelina playing MM that was just Kaiser wishfully thinking so you don’t have to get all butt hart about it.

    • des says:

      He’s been producing some great work but I think of all the films he’s produced Twelve Year A Slave will be the best. We’re talking about him having Steve McQueen plus the cast…yes very impressive.

  7. Lizzie K says:

    Might as well hang out a sign that says “Stalk here, Lindsay!”

  8. Jackie says:

    talk about beating a dead horse.

    what’s next? another movie about the vietnam war?

    these topics have been sucked dry already!

  9. beyonce's bump says:

    Please. Just No.

  10. cupidtyrox says:

    The Marilyn Monroe thing is beyond played out. Please leave this woman a lone. There were other fascinating movie stars whose stories deserve to be told like Roc Hudson, Gene Tierney, Lana Turner, Rita Hayworth.. Hollywood please, give Marilyn a breather!

    • Fleur says:

      YES! All of the above, or
      1. Vivien Leigh (gorgeous, talented, mercurial, mentally unstable, death by tuberculosis)
      2. Montgomery Clift (tragic, beautiful and died too young)
      3. Greta Garbo (Miss “I want to be alone”)
      4. Hedy Lamarr(hollywood beauty, inventor of Frequency Hopping)
      5. Elizabeth Taylor!

      There are so many incredibly compelling stories from Hollywood’s Golden Age. I love seeing Monroe’s movies and she had an indescribable It Factor that no actress has managed to emulate but there are dozens of other stories waiting to be told!

      • Silk Spectre says:

        Yes to Greta Garbo! A thousand times yes! The little girl from Sweden… So beautiful and talented. Just imagine a movie about her relationship with that playwright who was also Marlene Dietrich’s lover at one point, I forget her name. Mercedes something something.

    • Katherine says:

      I would love to see a well done bio pic on Marlene Dietrich. The woman was fascinating and in many ways a remarkable woman.

      Since I haven’t seen any of the Marilyn movies I’d enjoy a really well done film that explores her and the world she lived in. Andrew Dominick could make this very interesting. Or maybe it should be done by Oliver Stone and he can throw in every conspiracy theory about her death.

  11. marie says:

    I haven’t read the book, but still-no..

  12. dahlianoir says:

    Mr PITT, you want a dark and inspired movie to make ?
    Please adapt this manga (japanese comic book) I totally pictured la Jolie in it. PLEASE!

    http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/encyclopedia/manga.php?id=3104

  13. sarahtonin says:

    A Joyce Carol Oates ‘Blonde’ biopic was filmed in Melbourne in 2001 with Poppy Montgomery playing the lead.
    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0254890/

    A location scout approached us to film at my mother’s house but we declined. The offer was pitiful – about $500 to leave the house to them for the weekend. They’d clear it of furniture, put theirs in and then return it to original condition when they finished. Considering that wouldn’t even pay for a decent hotel, plus we had to leave our house for strangers to tip upside down, it’s no surprise we weren’t interested.

    (Edit: Although, if they’d told me it was for Patrick Dempsey’s scenes, and I could stay around and watch, I might’ve been more receptive to the idea ;))

    I feel for the poor bastards who agreed to rent their houses out for Liz & Dick. Were they told Lindsay was in it before they signed, I wonder?

    • Carrie says:

      i saw this tv movie with Poppy Montgomery:i remember she’s very good in it.She wasn’t Marilyn but she was believable in my opinion (more than Michelle Williams who was very good but lacked of sexiness)

      • sarahtonin says:

        Yeah I agree. It was not only far more interesting than My Week With Marilyn, but Poppy Montgomery was infinitely better than Michelle Williams. I just don’t get what anyone sees in Michelle at all.

        Btw, Australians (and those who can fake an Australian IP address) can watch this for free at the moment on The Age website. I watched it again the other day, coincidentally. http://www.theage.com.au/tv/Celebrities/show/Blonde-3139497.html

  14. Rhea says:

    I don’t even think Jolie wants to play Monroe.

  15. Alita says:

    Good idea? No – it has ‘fail’ written all over it.

    No matter how many photos are included of Brad looking thoughtful / staunch / formidable / resilient / etc in the post.

  16. Izzy says:

    As long as he doesn’t cast The Cracken.

  17. Naye in VA says:

    Funny how society always makes icons out of fucked up people… im not interested.

    give my daughter a real role model

  18. gigi says:

    I think that if Brad is producing it, it could be something worth watching. He won’t scrimp and he won’t take short cuts. Who knew he would have such interesting taste in film projects? Also, Brad has pretty good timing when it comes to these things. If this happens, you won’t see the finished product for another 2, maybe even 3 years, and by then, you’ll be missing Marilyn again.

  19. serena says:

    I don’t think Angelina will do it. I mean, she’s not suited to (phisically).

    Anyway I like Brad as a producer too, it’s good news.

    Please someone spare us from all the crack-rants that will be coming from Lohan’s camp in a while..sigh.

  20. StopItLuke says:

    Sounds interesting but I don’t know how well it’ll do so soon after “My week with Marilyn”… Can’t he make a big epic film about Elizabeth Taylor and save us from the cracken???

  21. Minty says:

    Bad idea. The film can’t really be called a biopic because the book it’s based on is a fictional novel. There are enough foolish people out there who think Blonde is a biography. They interpret the tabloid sensationalism as truth and this film will only add to the lies and distortions continually repeated by those too lazy to check the facts. I tried reading this book after having read seven Monroe biographies. Those biographies contradicted many of the things mentioned in the novel. Of course they would, since biographers make some effort to present honest observations.

    Joyce Carol Oates wrote from her imagination and certainly not from real research. She has said in interviews that she felt Norma Jeane guiding her hand to write Blonde. What pretentious bullsh-t. That can’t conceivably be true because I doubt Norma Jeane would denigrate herself as terribly as she’s treated in the book, especially since NJ worked very hard to improve her life and sought respect.

    Oates took every sleazy rumour she could find and presented them as “real” events. She had Marilyn experience frequent sexual brutalization and humiliation. And she had the nerve to say that Marilyn would admire this fictional version of her life. WTF?! She disguised her negative judgment of Marilyn as Marilyn judging herself. The tone was repeatedly disrespectful and depressing. That’s odd because Marilyn had a lot of high points in her life. She enjoyed many lighthearted moments, according to friends and colleagues. It’s no wonder Oates never tried to write a biography of her instead, since life has its ups as well as its downs.

    Naomi Watts at 43 is a bit old and too skinny to convincingly embody Marilyn anyway. I hope this film never gets made. The 2001 miniseries was bad enough. Poppy Montgomery did the best she could, considering the trashy material she had to work with.

    • Sassy says:

      I too have read every biography of Marilyn. I read “Blonde” twice. I liked it, and knew that it was historical fiction. Loved the book and really enjoy Joyce Carol Oates. I think it would make a great movie adaption.

  22. diana says:

    Off the topic… But I can actually imagine a slew of movies telling Angelina’s story in the future…Atleast Marilyn did nt get novels written about her till after her death… Angelina already has two!!!

    • Minty says:

      Actually, Marilyn Monroe by Maurice Zolotow was published while she was alive. Her “autobiography”, My Story, which she dictated to ghostwriter Ben Hecht during the 1950s, wasn’t published until 1974.

    • Sal says:

      You’re confusing actual novels or factual books with TABLOID books. The 2 books (which suitably bombed big time so much so hardly anyone is aware of them) were tabloids in hardcover. All ‘info’ gathered from Star, National Enquirer and USWeekly. So I’d hardly count them as anything of substance written about Angelina any more than I’d count an article from Star. In other words, no, Angelina hasn’t had any books written about her yet.

  23. Sara says:

    “the book is incredibly dark and the portrait of Marilyn is that of a very tortured, confused, mentally deficient woman”
    Well that’s because this was Marilyn. She was messed up from her childhood and may have inherited her mother’s psychological problems. They gave her the drugs to keep her from feeling. Too bad she didn’t have some good therapy instead of all the “prescribed” meds. She may have had a long life and career.

    • Minty says:

      They didn’t “give her the drugs to keep her from feeling.” She was prescribed pills to treat medical conditions: severe insomnia, endometriosis, and painful menstruation. Marilyn had several doctors, who overprescribed because each doctor didn’t know what the others were doing. Doctors then didn’t fully understand negative drug interactions the way they do now. Marilyn developed a high tolerance for the pills, so she increased the dosage and often swallowed them with champagne. Then she paid for it with the side effects. Also, she regularly visited at least two psychoanalysts (not at the same time) to deal with her issues.

      We’re talking about a woman who overcame childhood poverty & neglect, possible sexual abuse, zero family support, stage fright, and insecurity to become a top movie star. She divorced 2 husbands (one of them abusive) who did not want her to have a career. This was the 1950s, before feminism and equal rights. She had to have a lot of inner strength to get as far as she did.

      I don’t believe she committed suicide either. She was re-hired to finish Something’s Got To Give with a higher salary. She was in discussion with Hollywood people about upcoming film projects. She was buying furniture for her new home. You don’t make future plans when you intend to kill yourself. Yes, she often got depressed, and had mock suicide attempts in the past (as a cry for help), but biographies indicate that she was ready for a fresh start in her life when she died.

      As for the book, it’s a novel, not a biography. Completely fiction, as the author has said. No surprise that it’s lurid, melodramatic, and dark – the better to sell more copies.

  24. frothy says:

    well, i have 2 thoughts. can i guess who will play marilyn, gee i don’t know, this could be hard…

    second – could this fucker get any uglier at this point. i mean he’s just flat given up, no? his jaw seems to be growing out at an alien pace before our eyes. i really wish i didn’t have to see them every freaking day.

  25. Trish says:

    this might sound stupid but I would LOVE to see a TV movie about the long term, tumultuous relationship of Lucille Ball & Desi….. there was such passion there…even after they divorced. I don’t think there’s ever been a movie about them?.. I could be wrong….

  26. Anahata says:

    A woman with curves and incredible acting range should play her. Jennifer Lawrence? I know Pitt had his eye on her…

    • What a joke says:

      “I know Pitt had his eye on her… ” Quoting Star magazine? What a joke. And people wonder why America is dumbed down,lol.

  27. Emma says:

    I think this is a BAD idea but I can’t help but feel like Lana del Rey would do great as Marilyn. Not sure if she has any acting skills though.

  28. G says:

    I think that considering the source material and Brad’s involvement it would be a quality treatment.

    But, really? Is there any real interest in continuing to rummage around in the debris of this of this woman’s personal life?

  29. Maya says:

    “…I really didn’t think Michelle Williams’ Monroe was all that special or award-worthy.”

    Seriously?? Did we see the same movie?

  30. Katherine says:

    I think Angelina could do an excellent Marilyn. She’d have to fatten up a bit but her turn as that bleached blonde newscaster was sweet and poignant and she gave her a depth that made you root for her. I also thought she had great chemistry with Ed Burns? Where is Ed Burns by the way – he was very sexy.

  31. Shelly says:

    I loved the book “Blonde”. So good. I don’t know who nowadays could play Marilyn. I didn’t think that Michelle Williams was all that convincing either. She kind of got the voice down, but I couldn’t get over the fact that she looked nothing like her. I’m glad she didn’t win an Oscar for it, because it wasn’t anything spectacular (to me). I could sort of see Angelina as a dark Marilyn, but she would have to gain quite a bit of weight to be convincing, because her body and face are way too angular now.

  32. B says:

    I’m soooooooo tired of Marilyn Monroe. I guess it doesn’t help that I was never interested in her, but I’m beyond uninterested now. They really need to find a new figure to obsess over for a while.

  33. sk-g says:

    I’m shocked that JCO has turned this book, or any other that she’s written, loose in Hollywood. Remember how pissed Ann Rice was with what BP did to Interview With a Vampire? Now he’s on the other side of the camera. This doesn’t bode well. And yes, JCO is ‘dark’. Shocking as it is, it’s what she’s known for.

  34. Dredz says:

    Hopefully it will be better than the one starring Mira Sorvino back in the 90’s

  35. UniqJaz says:

    Besides her beauty, there really wasn’t anything interesting thing about her. Her acting was terrible ! I saw the movies they showed on channel thirteen. She was like a child trying to act. She compared herself to Elizabeth Taylor and wondered why Elizabeth was getting paid more and getting better movie roles. Maybe because she is a better actress and she took her job more seriously. I think Marilyn did have a “mental deficiency.”

    • Minty says:

      I disagree. She was great in “Bus Stop”, right down to the convincing hillbilly accent. Film critics of the time agreed and were pleasantly surprised. Hollywood refused to nominate her for an Oscar to spite her because she had “betrayed” her studio: she broke her slave contract to win more autonomy and moved to New York.

      In “The Prince And The Showgirl” she outshone Laurence Olivier and handled the rapid dialogue quite well. Olivier himself said that comedy was harder to do than drama and Marilyn had comedic talent. The movie itself was slow, but she was memorable in the scene where her character was drunk.

      She took her job seriously, but her performance anxiety and health/emotional problems later interfered with her reliability on film sets.

      Furthermore, unlike Elizabeth, Marilyn could sing, too. She was also a superior photographic model. Elizabeth was beautiful, of course, but she gave the same expression in almost every photograph. She mainly stood there. Marilyn was versatile in front of a camera. Many of the top photographers of her day said she needed no direction and she basically took charge of the shoot. All they had to do was press the button.

  36. taxi says:

    Scarlett J looks most like, & is best body match, for MM. She’d need to soften her voice. Michelle W was unconvincing. Naomi is too old now & doesn’t have the right face.

  37. Kosmos says:

    I guess I’m not a Marilyn fan as I do not get excited about continuing her legacy.