Robert Pattinson still hasn’t decided whether or not to dump Kristen Stewart

Kristen Stewart had already begun to do some photo shoots to promote her role in On the Road, plus some added promotion for her gig as the face of Balenciaga’s new perfume, Florabotanica. Unfortunately for all of us, these meager photo shoots and the odd quote here and there will probably be all we hear from Kristen for the next two months, and I want to be clear: all of this stuff happened BEFORE she was caught publicly grinding on Rupert Sanders. I’m including scans from a photo shoot Kristen did with Sam Riley and Garrett Hedlund for the September issue of Marie Claire (I believe the shoot went down in Cannes), plus a nice photo in the issue of the September Vogue with Balenciaga’s creative director, Nicolas Ghesquiere. I seriously doubt anything untoward happened between Kristen and Nicolas. But I’m itching to hear more about Kristen’s working relationship with Garrett Hedlund. Because… yeah, I could see that.

Meanwhile, we’re now about 36 hours away from Robert Pattinson’s first public appearance (on television) since the cheating scandal. Tomorrow night, he will appear on The Daily Show with Jon Stewart, and while I doubt the interview will be some kind of weepy, emotional confessional, I suspect we’ll have a better idea of how Rob feels, and whether or not he and Kristen are still together. That’s where a lot of the speculation has been this week – are they still together? Eh. Rob and Kristen weren’t listed on this year’s Forbes list of “Highest Paid Celebrity Couples” (which was released last week) – many saw their exclusion as some kind of sign, and they were right. A spokesperson for Forbes told HuffPo, “Stewart and Pattinson were, in fact, left off of the list because they are broken up.” GAH! Does Forbes have inside information? Probably not. Because a lot of outlets are claiming that Rob is considering giving Kristen another chance:

Robert Pattinson is making his way through the typical stages of heartbreak, and a source close to the Twilight star exclusively tells he’s over the anger phase and is even contemplating a reconciliation with Kristen Stewart.

“Rob was super angry for the first couple of weeks. Angry at Kristen for ruining what they had, angry at her for the public embarrassment, angry at Rupert [Sanders],” the source revealed. “But he’s starting to wind down and really think about what he’s going to do regarding his relationship with Kristen. He goes back and forth…”

According to the insider, Rob has been leaning on a select group of friends for support — and they’re giving him conflicting advice!

“There’s definitely some friends who think he should just move on from Kristen, but then there are others who still think Rob and Kristen really have a special connection and want him to give her another chance,” the source said. “He has a lot to think about and hasn’t decided either way right now.”

Rob, 26, has his first public appearance scheduled for Monday when he goes on Comedy Central’s The Daily Show with Jon Stewart to promote his new flick Cosmopolis, and the insider said he’s nervous.

“Rob’s always been a bit of an awkward nervous guy, but his appearances in New York next week have him frazzled,” the source said. “He’s keen on promoting his new movie, but he really doesn’t want to address his personal life or the cheating scandal because he’s just not ready yet and doesn’t want to say anything he’d regret.”

[From Radar]

I still don’t think we can judge the state of their relationship at this point. Rob loves her, he wants to believe her, he wants to get through the Breaking Dawn promotion with as little drama as possible. After they finish out the year… all bets are off. I think I might enjoy it a little bit if Rob feigned lovely-dovey feelings for Kristen for a few months and then unceremoniously dumped her as soon as the film promotion was over.

Photos courtesy of Vogue, Marie Claire.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

177 Responses to “Robert Pattinson still hasn’t decided whether or not to dump Kristen Stewart”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Birdie says:

    Gosh, I hope he dumps her.

    • aida says:

      I really hope he find it in his heart to forgive her.

    • carrie says:

      he cheated her with Emily De ravin

      and no one thought she had to dump him

      PS: i always thought Pattinson and Stewart were more friends (only a RP couple for Twiligt) than a real couple

    • Lm says:

      He will.

      I was going through the same thing after I found out that my man was having an affair.

      First comes the rage, then the heartbreak and forgiveness. It takes, at least, a few months for the fog to clear up.

      Even if they get together now it’ll be briefly. With all the kissing on cam and long work days with hunks she’ll have in the future he won’t be able to restore the trust that has been lost.

      • bluhare says:

        I am proof that yes, you can. A relationship can definitely be salvaged after infidelity. You have to want to for the right reasons, though.

      • Erinn says:

        The difference is that I assume part of your job doesn’t involve making out on screen, and shooting sex scenes. I feel like, I personally would have a hard time trying to get over cheating if the cheaters job involved them making out with co-stars.

    • TXCinderella says:

      I hope he spares himself any further heartache and moves on. In his mind he will always be wondering if she is cheating. It would take alot for him to trust her again.

    • Amelia says:

      The married man who cheated with her is in a more binding committed relationship, but Kristen isn’t. If his wife could forgive him, I see no reason why Robert should not forgive Kristen.

      • gg says:

        By the same token, since the couple that has a binding promise has decided to be together since they already had a family, it doesn’t follow that the couple that did not have anything binding (a marriage and children) have no particular reason to get back together if the cards aren’t right.

        It’s busted forever. If they do try again, it won’t last 2 or 3 months.

  2. Sarah says:

    Kinda feel sorry for her, she was totally taken advantage of by a man in a position of power who should have known better. She’s 22, of course she’s going to fuck up, but he’s got NO excuse.

    • CTgirl says:

      @Sarah, what affair have you been reading about because it sure isn’t this one. KS had much more professional power than RP and she’s a 22 year old woman not a child. A woman who grew up in Hollywood and had an affair with a man whose wife and children she knows. She didn’t trip and fall into his winky. She made a decision to grind on this guy. No one took advantage of anyone. Both KS and RP are equally to blame. This crap about KS being a victim at her age sets equal rights back about 50 years.

      • Joanna says:

        yeah, but he prob told her he and his wife weren’t getting along but he wasn’t quite ready to file for divorce b/c of kids; he’s confused, etc. there are smooth men out there; yeah, she’s in hollywood but does that change her from being 22? at 36, i can spot a dog from a mile away; at 22, not so much.

      • CTgirl says:

        @Joanna, I could spot those dogs in my teens and she’s 22, not 17. She grew up in the industry and I’m sure has seen the worst of the Hollywood swamp. KS isn’t naive. She was caught.

      • Genevieve says:

        Thank GOD some of the hatred directed at KStew is beginning to simmer down.

        Some of the Twihards have been so vociferous in their rage, I truly worried for the girls safety if she appeared in public lately. I’m delighted to hear two rational, sane people on this board stick up for her and place a large portion of the blame on the 41 yr. old husband and father who should have known better.

        I’m going to try REEEAAALLLYYY hard not to respond to the one or two doinks who post outrages responses today. Yes, the girl did wrong. No, I do not think you can blame her to the same degree that you can blame the older man who threw caution and his family to the wind.

        I’m with Kaiser on this one. I think Rob and KStew may make up to a degree for the BD:2 press tour, then fall apart afterwards. Which will make most people on Team Rob divinely happy. So be it. But I think the extremes against KS have been not only draconian, but a great example of how out of whack our relationships with celebrities have become. 🙁

      • Az says:

        I am so glad all of you have been paragons of virtue during your ENTIRE LIVES so that you can judge Kristen Stewart appropriately. Thank God none of you made any mistakes during your teens/early 20s. Me, I just hope she eventually recovers from this. Her publicists should be fired and never be allowed to work again considering how badly they botched the whole thing. As for Sparkles, he has been spreading his glitter all over the place for quite some time now and the only difference between him and Kristen is that he hasn’t been caught in public. Yet. And even if he were, he would never receive as much vitriol nor would he be judged the way she has been because boys will be boys is a double standard that is VERY MUCH alive and well. Shame on you for perpetuating this double standard.

      • CC says:

        She’s definitely wise to the world, she grew up among considerably twisted adults, all of the hollywood scene is a cesspoll of vice and immorality, but he’s still the bigger douche, he’s the one that had a legal commitment to someone else, as well as kids. Let’s not forget that her and Rob were only dating. Doesn’t make it right, but equal rights only apply when there are equal circumstances. She is guilty, but less guilty than Sanders.

        Because trying to apply equal rights/fault to different circumstances is a bias in itself.

        him= married guy with 2 kids that cheated
        her= single girl in a monogamous relationship that cheated

        Not the same thing.

      • Anna says:

        Sorry joana, but I disagree. Yes, maybe I sound like a b*tch, but I don’t care. YOU CAN be mature at 22 years old. I clearly don´t understand how is this defense of Stewart of make her like an idiot or something along. I’m 24 years old and I have mistakes, but also I have rules and one of them is “Never do any harm in a marriage”. Also, there are other girls even younger than Stewart who fights for difficult situations. The age isn´t an excuse.

        I am so glad all of you have been paragons of virtue during your ENTIRE LIVES so that you can judge Kristen Stewart appropriately. Thank God none of you made any mistakes during your teens/early 20s.

        For me, I defend my criticism against Stewart. She was enabler of this breakup -She knew the wife, she had time with the children-, if she REALLY care she could just said NO. She was hypocrite enough sell us as an old and mature soul – bullshits. Cheating and breaking up a marriage isn’t exactly a mistake AZ. And yes, I WOULD NEVER be with a married man.

        As for Sparkles, he has been spreading his glitter all over the place for quite some time now and the only difference between him and Kristen is that he hasn’t been caught in public.

        Az, give us some proofs of that if you are sure of this statement. Or you are just a KStew crazyfan who blames anyone else. So, again just bullshit.

        Yet. And even if he were, he would never receive as much vitriol nor would he be judged the way she has been because boys will be boys is a double standard that is VERY MUCH alive and well. Shame on you for perpetuating this double standard.

        I part agree with that for the double standart, but that doesn’t dismiss the failure against Stewart in this situation. It’s like a thief accusing another thief. Even here in Celebitchy, we have parcial for blaming both -Stewart and Sanders- of this mess. Sorry, but I have more sympathy for Rob, Liberty Ross and her children

    • Joanna says:

      yeah, i feel sorry for her too. bad enough to have messed up like that, but she’s in the spotlight too. and he prob fed her some b.s. too. when i was young like that, i was naive and fell for older men’s b.s. before. that’s why those type of guys go for young girls, they’re naive enough to believe their lines.

      • Bobby sue says:

        I agree! I got 4 tattoos when I was her age. Would I now, at age 41?? HELL TO THE NO!
        As Dr. Phil puts it, when you are young you just cannot “see around the corner.” This extends to partying, texting while driving, trying drugs, sexual experimentation and more. A 40 year old man has no business expecting her to be his equal on any decision making level, whether she’s been in movies or not. Ease up.

      • gg says:

        Exactly. And 😆 @ Bobby sue’s comment. +1

    • bec says:

      sarah are u high!
      she is a black widow very aware of what she is doing.
      Do you realise she was in a 4 year relationship before rob. Therefore she has been at it for 8 years.

      • gg says:

        A “black widow”?? 😆 wow, at age 22, a ball bustin, experienced hatchet woman. who knew. No, she’s still a teenager in the head, clearly, or she’d never have done this.

    • Lm says:

      I have absolutely no sympathy.

      She’s a grown woman who slept with a married father of two.

      There are NO excuses.

      • Norma says:

        Couldn’t agree more. she must have been giving out the requisite signals. Push enough bananas through the gorilla cage, sooner or later he’ll take one. She’s one of those birds that like to see if they can score against the odds.

      • Isa says:

        Yea sorry, she’s not 12. I’m only 2 years older than her. I’m sheltered and naive. My husband says I never know when a guy is interested or flirting with me. But I still know better than to cheat.
        I dont understand how people can believe she’s actually a victim. The only victims are Rob, the children and Liberty.

      • Liv says:

        Plus she always talked about how she’s such an old soul and more mature than her peer group – yeah, what a crap.

      • geekychick says:

        I’m sorry, Norma, I’m not sure if I understood correctly: so, poor married man is a monkey, a gorilla who just can’t control his poor libido/ego/whatever, and a girl is a witch, constantly pushing his buttons so that she’ll trap him?? I really hope that I misunderstood you, because…vow. Talking about misogyny and chauvinistic stereotypes from the 50ies..
        Again, if I misunderstood, I apologize!

    • Jane says:

      When Rupert came on to her all she had to do was say no, no, no.

    • Nan209 says:

      She is not a victim of anything but her own choices. She screwed up right along with RP. I don’t hold her more responsible than RP just equal. When you make excuses like that you should flip the coin and see the other side of that excuse: poor RP he was taken advantage of by a 22 year old who just wanted to use him. Blah, blah. That’s just an excuse, on of many. It means nothing. It changes nothing. They were adults who chose to do what they did. The end.

      I do feel pity for them because they have so royally f-ed up in front of the world. It’s not a private matter and that sucks for everyone involved.

    • lucky says:

      I was actually sorta agree with your comment- and I totally don’t agree that is sets women’s lib back at all. Sexual harassment happens to adult women and men, we can’t just assume, “she is 22 and should know better” without knowing what actually happened. He is a director and an older man and that sets up a power dynamic that could POTENTIALLY put her in a one-down position. Did it? I don’t know but I am willing to give her the benefit of the doubt and not pass too much judgement. I get a skeevy vibe from the situation and it is more about an adult man who preys on younger women that a young woman who makes the mistake of trusting an older man in a position of power and influence in her life.

      • Anna says:

        lucky, I don’t buy it this argument of sexual harrasment. First, maybe Sanders is the director but he’s not a Michael Bay in terms of power or influence, or even a Christopher Nolan in terms of money. He’s most an unknown replacable first time director. Yes, I sound so misogynist, but I recognize Stewart has more power in this relationship -She was no. 1 female star by Forbes-, also with the clear support of Theron, it would fired him. Actually, in this mess, he lose more than gain: Family, credibility, future work and reputation.

  3. CTgirl says:

    This has become the most boring scandal ever. KS can suck the life out of anything. She really is a black hole of emo angst where no light will penetrate. Sigh.

    • Liz says:

      But she’s not a young girl, she a grown woman. She is not a fifteen year old, I cannot be the only one who finds this reasoning by her fans so distasteful.
      ETA That was a reply to a earlier comment-sorry

    • bec says:

      could not have said it better my self.!!!!!
      Just for the record, would love to know what Nikki whatever her name is (rosalie from twilight) says about all this.
      Kristen seems to have a pattern of intensely hooking up with people, sucking the life out of them then fucking them off to find her next symbiotic victim.

    • corny says:

      Agree, can’t wait for their next promo so we will see, back together at last…what a bunch of BS

    • Norma says:

      apologies, can’t reply to geekychick so had to use the closest reply button that worked! So this isn’t to CTgirl… Geekychick, do you really believe that human nature changes according to what year we are living in? Political correctness might pay lip service, but people are people. are you suggesting that “nowadays” people are more compassionate or correct in their treatment of others? seems arrogance of youth speaking. Y’all invented how to behave right?

      Gender my foot. men are men and women are women. Both genders have been known to “cheat” to coin the quaint term so often used here.

      And yeah, if you offer “a treat” hard enough and consistently enough, there’s a pretty strong chance it will be taken, albeit in a moment of weakness, for whatever reason. seen it so many times with friends – husbands wanting to dump the mistress, but mistress goes nuts. Or bananas.

      I mentioned gorilla as an example of a quiet, family oriented, gentle soul. But if you keep pushing him, he will respond. Monkeys chauvinism witches and misogyny are your words. Btw, gorillas are apes, not monkeys. They don’t have a tail, and they are cleverer.

      • Sweetie says:

        ^ more clever. “Cleverer” is not a word.

      • Sweetie says:

        WHoah! Wait. Totally had a brain fart. Did not mean to do that. Should not post so late lol. Sorry! I really hope you two just misunderstood yourselves, honestly? Sorry to butt in, but I read both your posts and saw where you were coming from, so I hope this was a misunderstanding? Norma was saying if you keep offering to anyone, they will take it, but GT chick read it as gender bias?

      • geekychick says:

        This is one of those times when I’m really sorry that time zones of most of us don’t match..
        If your point is that if you dangle something in front of a person, person will eventually take it…I don’t agree. I think it’s generalization and a myth (just as “boys will be boys”): we are intelligent creatures with our own free will, and if I decide to cheat on my bf, that’s MY fault, no matter how beautiful or hot the “other” person is.
        And TBH, if you end up with a mistress, decide ti dump her, and then blame her because you were too scared of repercussions when she freaked out-I’m not saving my sympathy for that kind of people. Maybe not have a mistress in the first place? Confess to your partner, when you already had the “bravery” to screw it up? And not blame the person who was not in a relationship with your partner.
        If your comment wasn’t gender biased, Norma, then the same thing can be said for Stewart: Poor girl, he just kept dangling his hot body in front of her, so she had no choice-she had to cave! Right?

        Well, we obviously agree to disagree.

  4. the original bellaluna says:

    Garrett is SO Finnick.

    I could see Kristin and him together – she DOES have a history of getting involved with those with which she works, does she not? 😉

    • Liv says:

      Armie Hammer for Finnick! 😉

    • TheOriginalTiffany says:

      Hmmm, yes.

      Another cheating scandal on our hands. Anderson coopers boyfriend totally making out with ahot dude in a open park.

      Kstew part duex? Is it not stupid to cheat out in the open?

    • Az says:

      Garrett Hedlund seems to do the same thing (hook up with those he works with) as evidenced by the fact that he is currently involved with Kirsten Dunst who he met while filming On the Road. What a strong man he must be to be able to avoid the man sucking black hole that is Kristen Stewart’s vagina. Yes, this is sarcasm.

    • Glimmer Bunny says:

      YES! All I could concentrate on in this story was the beautiful photo of Garrett and how much he SCREAMS Finnick to me.

      (And I’m sure he didn’t get with Kristen while filming, he was already dating Kirsten Dunst then.)

  5. deb says:

    Rob loves her and wants to believe her? Give me a break. Get over it , this showmance is done.

    • My Darling Pinkett says:

      +1 Thank you! God, their so-called romance is so fake!

    • MW says:

      Wonder what the excuse is she’s cooked up that he supposedly “wants to believe”? He is doing the right thing – just waiting it out to see how he ultimately feels. But, if he takes her back, after she also did this to her other boyfriend, she will learn nothing except that it does not matter what she does, she always seems to get away with it in the end.

  6. Julie says:

    if there was anything new it would be all over the news.
    i dont think we will get anything new tbh, not even when promo starts. ofc people will try to read anything into some body language but thats all just interpretation.
    the only thing i hope for is that TMZ will publish a pic of the papers for the ross/sanders divorce.

  7. lisa2 says:

    I don’t know much about the movie On the Road.. well nothing. but every time I see a promotional still it makes me think of Savages. The two men and the one woman; just different faces.

    anyway tomorrow I’m sure Jon will make a Kristen reference. But there won’t be a lot of discussion about her at all.

  8. bea says:

    I’m starting to believe what I read yesterday – it’s a contract romance, either she slipped up and got papped (don’t really believe that) or it’s how they’re ending it, with a big scandal, conveniently right before the last movie comes out.

    And it works! We’re all discussing it, it’s on every magazine and I’m sure everyone will see the movie.

    • lisa2 says:

      You don’t ruin a marriage and the lives of 2 small children. Not to mention family because you need to end a fake romance.

      I really don’t see how people think that is possible. These are real people. I know everyone on gossip sites love the conspiracy theories. But common sense has to come in to play.

      this was not a PR move..

      • bec says:

        thought about this spin (break up just before BD2 airs) because of the timing.
        Though there is not a pr person on earth that would allow their client to be caught being “the other woman”- especially when kids are involved. No matter how many fans she has, there are few whom would forgive her for this.
        This is also why she gave the public apology. She has to grovel to as many fans as she can. Because even her staunch followers are wavering in their love for her under her new “homewrecker” role.

      • carrie says:

        you can believe in the conspiracy theory when you know that the magazine paid the paparazzi to follow her this day precisely
        and the guy and her are not low-key

        but for the note,it does many dramas and publicities for Twilight’s promotion

      • Lady D says:

        “You don’t ruin a marriage and the lives of 2 small children.”

      • geekychick says:

        The director ruined his marriage and life of his children. Even if she did it for PR/ending a fake romance, his marriage is his responsibility and he ruined all that himself, by his actions. She ruined her relationship.

      • Rory says:

        +1 But using logic and common sense won’t get you anywhere with the Twi loonies and conspiracy theorists.

      • martha says:

        there are really weird things in this, she was looking in several pics directly at the camera, as it always happens with her (again weird), she was out in the open too, so that leaves 2 other theories she slipped up & someone got the tip of what was going to happen or she did it all by herself on purpose because she was tired of faking the dating with Rob, which was kind of obvious on CC with the comments from both of them, yes I think it was a PR romance, if you see interviews she is always complaining about rob or what he says or what he does and lately he wasn’t much better with the fake smiling and the drunkness just for being next to her

    • puhlease says:

      really? where did you read that? i’ve always thought it was a PR stunt like Bieber and Gomez but I never saw an article about it.

      • Isa says:

        No I don’t understand this at all.
        Good PR= having them get engaged and then quietly break up after the movie is released.
        Bad PR= cheating on an adored actor and splitting up a family.
        I know they say any publicity is good publicity. But I don’t think that counts for Twihards.

    • the original bellaluna says:

      Count me out – I’m not seeing it.

      Twilight nearly put me into a coma, and I tried watching more than once. It wasn’t true to the books (yes, I read them all – I was on bed-rest my entire pregnancy, don’t judge me!) and it was SO. TEDIOUS. No thanks.

      p.s. If this was a PR move, it was the WORST PR move EVER. Right up there with TC’s Disneyland Dad routine and his “alternate birthday celebration” in Cali.

      • MrsBPitt says:

        @bellaluna – ITA…I am no spring chicken and I enjoyed the books. Went to see the first Twi movie and could have snoozed through it…not true to the books…casting sucked….acting sucked…didn’t waste my money seeing the rest…I really don’t believe they were a real couple…RPatz makes my gadar ping…it wouldn’t be the first time that studios made co-stars fake a romance for the sake of the movie…

      • Kayen says:

        This exactly! Not only would it have been a terrible move to have your client caught in sexy pictures with a married man with children, A) the timing was TERRIBLE, because it brought the wrath of the Twihards down on Kstew before the opening of their last big hurrah as HISTORYS GREATEST LOVERS LIKE OMFG, so there’s no gain there, B) Kristen Stewart is already Hollywoods big it girl, so why rock the boat wrecking the marriage of someone way less famous, she’s not some random C lister that needs attention and C) most importantly, the PR response on the part of her team- her being photographed crying, the sob press stories about not having sex with RS and her not showering, eating ice cream all day, etc, and of course her AWFUL pathetic statement- were so so counter to her girl too cool for school image shed been rocking before.

        Conspiracy theories are fun and all, but I gotta believe a PR stunt would have some actual PR work behind it instead of all this wretched scrambling.

        Edit: woops sorry this was supposed to be to Bellaluna. Though I have no idea if they were a real couple, that could be fake. I just think the affair wasn’t PR

      • Genevieve says:

        I read the Twilight books, as well…I know, I’m a pitiful nerd. But the first movie got such bad reviews, I haven’t seen any of them.

        I think KStew and RPat are real people with a real romance. I agree w/ O Bella…if this was a PR move, it was the lamest EVER. I wish the fans of the movies would just simmer the EFF DOWN. Seriously. Whatever happens, will. Speculation about these two actors will effect as much change as wishing Brangelina will walk down the aisle this weekend, the next or the next after.

        Whatever happens, will. Nothing you Twihards do can change that, sorry 🙁

    • Julie says:

      could rob and kristen have been a pr setup? possible
      could the homewrecking be a pr setup? not possible.

      there is a bad girl image and there is “she totally wrecked the lives of two little children” image. with the first you can sell movies with the latter you end careers.

      even if she cheated with a single guy things would be really bad so why would anyone go there?

      this cheating isnt so much about robert. he will learn that women are also capable of cheating and move on with his life, for the ross family its nowhere near this easy.

      • Bobby sue says:

        I don’t think any one really wants to be a pariah to this degree so I tend to think this was not a PR stunt, per se.
        BUT, I remember not too long ago when the Vogue cover article came out this little morsel she said which I thought was ridiculous and wold surely make people say WHAT (???) in regards to her character/personality/thought process… About how she had this blessed life and she wished something awful would happen to her or something like that. This was self-sabotage for sure.

    • mln76 says:

      Contract or studio arranged relationship w/ benefits YES! Gawker had a write up detailing RPatz’s dalliances with several co-stars that sounds way too believable…Publicity stunt break-up no way… Kristen went from being the top paid actress to now unable to promote her films due to a self imposed exile. She had no reason to try to change her image she was already getting edgy roles along w/ mainstream films. She was just plain old stupid.

      • Anname says:

        Completely debunked by gossipcop. Some crazy longtime fan sent her rant to many many gossip sites, and 2 or so decided to print it.

      • mln76 says:

        @Aname after reading the Gossip Cop ‘debunk’ . I haven’t changed my opinion. R-Patz an K-Stew were f-buddies at most with a real interest in pleasing the studio/fans with an overhyped relationship.

      • mia girl says:

        mln76 – I know from reading your posts that you are a reasonable, but consistent fan to some celebrities. You take exception when there are misconceptions and pure fic written about them. I respect how you also do so in a civil tone. Well, imo that Gawker piece was exactly that re : Pattinson.

        Almost words for word, that “chronicle” of Pattinson’s love life has been posted ad naseum on comment boards over the years at the Awful Truth, Gossip Cop, US weekly etc. by the same seemingly crazily obsessed person – or group of Stewart fans who apparently hate Pattinson.

        Do I know if any of it is true? Nope. Have I witnessed half of this crap made up on message boards and the spouted as truth? Most definitely.
        Was I shocked to see Gawker post what is basically speculation and fanfic on their site, especially since it accuses celebrities by their names of having threesomes, herpes, etc? Absolutely.

        I am sure Pattinson is no angel, but that piece is proof only of how batshit crazy some Twihards are. Even the pics they pose as proof of cheating are of Pattinson and an actress filming scenes together.

      • Anname says:

        If you are actually interested in this, do a little more research.
        This crazy fan has been around for years, huge Kristen fan, hates Rob. She was all over Eonline last week threatening to send her crazy rant to all the gossip sites if Rob didn’t publicly forgive Kristen. So she sends this rant off, it gets published by 1 or 2 sites (every other site ignored it, even HOllywoodlife!), but you still choose to believe it?
        What about the new rumor, in which he has had bisexual flings with Peter Facinelli and Kellen Lutz – that’s from her rant too.
        She is a recognized threat by both Rob and Kristen’s security. I just don’t get how you can believe this listing of every random rumor in the past 3 years.

      • mln76 says:

        @ Mia Girl fair enough I didn’t realize the fan was that nuts. I still have the gut instinct that Robsten wasn’t real and that he’s been smart about his business 😉

      • normades says:

        Gawker story aside, I’m on team min76 in thinking that Robsten was mostly fabricated while Rupsten is not.

  9. aquarius64 says:

    If these photo shoots took place pre-scandal, it’s her team putting the info out there trying to show her career didn’t take a hit from her flustercluck. Nice try. The sales figures from the Balenciaga’s perfume campaign and the magazines she covers will tell the tale. Twi-hards will buy at first just to support her, but campaigns like these depend on long-term success. These are not movie tickets; Stewart’s fanbase for the most part doesn’t have the money to buy high end products over and over again. Pattinson is getting out in front of this and doing live interviews. Stewart needs to grow up and do the same just to get some of this out of the way. A sit down with Barbara Walters or Oprah Winfrey would do, but KS needs to remember these ladies will not tolerate F-bombs from her.

    IMO Pattinson should not take her back so soon if he’s leaning towards that. He needs to make her work for regaining his trust. And if she’s sincere, FULL DISCLOSURE, especially with revisited allegations she ran through other men on his watch. (You have to believe that has crossed Pattinson’s mind, especially with Taylor Lautner.) If a tabloid come up with evidence that Stewart messed with Sanders more than once, or that she had another sidepiece, Robsten is done.

    • geekychick says:

      I don’t think that anybody sane would be suspicious toward Taylor Lautner. It’s like you’re suspicious of cardboard cut-out. 😉

  10. Launicaangelina says:

    I believe the relationship is real. With that mindset, meh, they’re in their 20s and people f**k up a lot in their 20s. She did a sh*tty thing but so have many; we just didn’t have the world watching us. I’ll be the first to say I wasn’t a saint. Hopefully, they move on apart from one another.

    Personally, it’s hard for me to fathom how couples stay together for life when they meet at teens or early 20s. I can only speak for myself but who I was in my late teens and early 20s is not who I am now in my early 30s. Also, I’ve learned quite a bit about brain development due to my work. Our brains aren’t fully mature until we about 25.

    • geekychick says:

      Most don’t, but I think it’s matter of true love and growing up and changing together. My mom and dad are married since she was 19, and he supported her while she finished colegge and stayed home with my oldest sister (he was 23)-they never regretted anything (and are fast approaching their 40-years anniversary -they’re on 38th year!).;) The same was with my older sister and her husband (they’re together since the first grade of high school-they’re 38 now). I’m with my fiance since I was 20 (I’m 26), but we knew very soon that it’s for life. I went through hell and back these last few years and he was always there.Sometimes you just stumble on Love, and you can’t let it pass just because you’re young. 🙂
      Sorry for the OT rant, but my guy is so sweet today, I’m all lovey-dovey. 🙂

    • Shannen says:

      Agreed on the fact everybody makes mistakes and that normal people don’t have the world knowing every little detail about it- but we don’t even earn as much as these Hollywood people do, so that’s a con to one of their many pros. (Hell, I’d rather have my privacy and lead a normal lifestyle, but that’s me. They chose differently and should deal with the consequences of said choice.)

      I think the other difference is in the magnitude of the mistakes. Cheating is already bad enough when one is single and the other is in a relationship- let alone when he’s married with two small kids, you’re somewhat friendly with his family and you are in a committed relationship yourself. People in their early twenties fuck up, sure, even people in their early 70s make mistakes- but I don’t agree with the fact it should be dismissed on the age account. Let alone the fact that a Hollywood actress is much more navigated and has experienced more things than a normal twenty-something, she should have known better still. And of course, the married director is completely to blame too- he was the one who had more to lose and didn’t give a damn. Quite honestly, I think neither of them can be justified. (I say this being 22 myself and being someone who detached herself from a situation where he was in a relationship with another girl before anything at all happened, exactly because I refuse the idea of being someone you cheat with as well as that of being cheated on.)

      I do agree that I have issues believing most people who get together so early will actually stay together ’til the end. There are a few, sure, very lucky ones who find their soulmates so early on, but for the rest is just a learning process. I know I am not the same person I was two mere years ago and I don’t even know how much wiser I’ll become, the more I experience. [/end]

    • jlw says:

      ^^ this re: brain developement
      Sanders is a pig;
      Stewart, whatever else she may be, was taken advantage of;
      Rob was caught in the middle.

      That said, nobody died and it’s not the end of the world for any of them

  11. Dirtnap says:

    I’m picturing a reality show. Kristen vies to win back Sparkles by competing against Twi-hards in a series of dangerous and humiliating stunts. The Twis let her think she is winning. She makes it to the final round, dolls up in Balenciaga and booties and waits on a scenic cliff for Rob to give her the final rose. And then the Twis eat her. Finis.

  12. Chatcat says:

    I don’t want to see love-dovey nonsense. I want Rob to do what so many don’t do … stand up for himself and show the world “hey I was wronged, I was cheated on, my trust was betrayed and I don’t and won’t accept it”.

    Man up and move on Rob…she isn’t worth it, and neither is the entertainment value.

    What a nice change THAT would be.

  13. shannon says:

    *sigh* And again, I point out: we don’t know their relationship. Why assume Sparkles is the saint, just because he didn’t get caught? Well, that sounds wrong, ilke I’m accusing him – and I’m not. My point is just that WE DON’T KNOW. We don’t know whether or not he’s been totally faithful, we don’t know their relationship, we don’t know them.

    Worst case scenario, she made a mistake countless of kids (young adults, whatever) make all the time. If Angelina and Brad get a pass (and why not? I couldn’t care less), why is Kristin being vilified? Bottom line is that we don’t know, and constantly defending some cheaters and throwing the book at others is pretty hypocritical. Sorry for being the voice of reason …

    • geekychick says:

      +1 to everything you said! 🙂

    • Angi says:

      This is the smartest comment I’ve seen since the start of this whole thing.

    • carrie says:


    • dovesgate says:

      There was never photographic proof Brad and Angelina cheated on Jen. No one will know what really went down there but all three parties involved say there was no cheating.

      There are a whole slew of pictures proving Kristen and Rupert are cheaters.

    • Annie says:

      Exactly, just we don’t know what’s going on. For all we know they had an open relationship or she was his beard and Sparkles is just acting all betrayed because that’s what his publicist told him to do. Whatever they do, I hope they do what they really feel is right not just to satisfy public feeling.

    • Janet says:

      Have you been living under a rock for the past seven years? Angie hardly got a pass. She got death wishes from crazy Aniston fans not only against herself but also against her children. The reason you don’t hear so much against her now is that it all happened years and years ago, most people have accepted that she and Brad are committed to each other and to their children, and poor Aniston has become sort of a caricature of herself that few people care about any more.

  14. geekychick says:

    Eh, whatever he does, I just hope he does it for HIMSELF. The same goes for her. As I said-I hate cheating, but a 22 year old girl and a 40+ married man, who was her boss? And she’s not my gf or my friend or close family, so I’ll leave judgement to them.
    But I’m probably biased-I like her and I like her acting (don’t kill me!)
    Btw, is anybody else suspicious of all these reports about Ross and Sanders reconciling? That’s what suspicious to me-WHY would she take him back, when she’s such a lovely, well-known and well-off woman? And I don’t buy that it’s for the kids. I buy Lainey’s version.

    • Zoid says:

      See, I can kind of get the age difference thing, but not the ‘he was her boss’ line. He wasn’t her boss. The movie was long over when that scandalous shoot was released. She’s in a contract for the sequel already, he was not. What on earth could he threaten her with? It’s not like she’s a normal girl where a man in a position of power (boss, professor) can fire or fail her and she will have no where to go. She’s in a contract. She has a whole team of lawyers and other people behind her in an instant if she needs it. She’s the highest paid actress in Hollywood! And most importantly, she was already in contract for the role when they started their affair (assuming it started after the movie did). What on earth could he threaten her with?

      • MSL says:


      • geekychick says:

        Well, I was attending theater-based acting school for 6 years (11-17, don’t judge, it was a part of national program of funding for “talented” kids) and my best friend is an academic actress. When you’re filming (even more than when you’re in a play), your director is your everything-he sets the character in every scene, he watches how you walk, talk, dress-he can challenge every trait of your character and demand another, he can demand you stay on set from 3am to 12 am the next day-and you won’t tell a thing. it’s normal in those circles. it may sound stupid, and I don’t know how to explain it better, but the actor and director very often “bond” in a way, because of the nature of the work process. it can be very similar with the actors themselves too-that’s why their friendships and relationships are so intense, but short (relatively)-because they are used to forming intense relationships-they see the same people for months on set, and then-puf! a new set and new people come in a few months time.
        I don’t think that he as a boss could threaten or did threaten her with something or that he could demand something-I think it’s far more psychological thing. My friend got stuck in very similar situation-and it took some time for her to realize not only that she got herself into something she thought she’d never do, betrayed her morals and he used her. Her depression after that was pretty gut wrenching. And that’s not even HW, that’s just some small country national theater! 🙂 So, yes, as I said-I see power imbalance here.
        That’s why I gave up acting and went on to archaeology. The fakeness of that world and the pseudo-artists are too much for me!
        Sorry for the long, long response.

  15. Izzy says:

    I do feel a little bit for Kristen given the public heat she’s taking, but she put herself in this position, period. Rupert Sanders needs to go just go away, go back to doing commercials. And Sparkle needs to date some more before settling down with anyone, even if he does decide to take Lip-Bite back eventually.

    And slightly OT, have you guys seen the E! boards? KS Twi-nuts in full force. I read about five minutes’ worth, now I’m pissed that I’ll never get that five minutes back. I thought the new comment rating system there would control the Twi-Trolls, but it just means they go on and give low ratings to every comment they don’t like. Kinda like $cientology.

  16. Vanesaa says:

    I don’t comment on these twilight threads as I’ve never seen the movies and really don’t care for any of the actors involved, but here goes. I do not believe their relationship was ever real. I think it’s all part of a lucrative contract for the duration or the Twilight series, for obvious reason, i.e.; the twihards. They wanted a real-life romance for the fans. I do think that they’re both good friends, or they wouldn’t have agreed to it in the first place, but both were probably seeing other people quietly for a while.

    I think she genuinely slipped up getting caught with the director, and that Summit Entertainment is scrambling to keep them both on board until their promotional duties are finished. The “I love him I love him” letter was clearly written for PR (and stinks of Wuthering Heights-esque teenage angst), I don’t think Rob was crushed at all, and was fine with Kirsten dating discretely, but is now embarrassed because he looks like a heart-broken fool.

    I would guess that he wants a clean break from everything twilight related now, and wants out of their showmance, but Summit has contracts and enough money to facilitate a ‘reunion’ until the last movie is out of the theatres.

    • Anname says:

      This fake relationship accusation is tiresome, and frankly I find it ridiculous. It makes no sense that 2 actors would give up 4yrs of their lives to promote movies that don’t need any help becoming blockbusters!
      It is obvious the relationship was real, 10 minutes of online research will give you private/hacked photos of holidays with family together, parties, NOT PR pictures. Private does not mean fake.
      Some think it was epic love, some think it was not quite as serious, but those denying a real relationship are ignoring the evidence out there.
      I think they are both suffering now, she hurt him and she knows it.

      • mainland says:

        Whats so ridiculous about it? They didn’t waste 4 years, they are part of a very successful multi-billion dollar franchise, and I am sure that if they were in a fake relationship for the studios then they were well compensated (money, scripts) even more for going along with it. Deals like this are made in hollywood all the time, and its always self serving why people choose to do it. On top of that, maximum publicity and exposure just for making a few high profile appearances together 4/5 times out of an entire year, all the while being able to sleep and date whoever they want on the side as long as its discreet. What did they waste exactly? Two ambitious actors who are more interested in hollywood then they are in marriage and babies didn’t waste anything.

        I am on the fence about whether these two were in a fake relationship, but its certainly plausible that they were and with the exception of this pr disaster kristen participated in, I didn’t see nothing but gain for both parties to go along with it.

      • Vanesaa says:

        “It makes no sense that 2 actors would give up 4yrs of their lives to promote movies”

        It makes perfect sense to me because,
        a) any parallel off-screen romance with the two lead actors equals promotional nirvana, magazine covers, happy fangirls, and let’s not forget that four years ago, neither was that big of a star.

        b) if they are buddies, it’s hardly a hardship to hang out/be roommates/go to the movies. It’s not like they really milked it by getting engaged or anything, so it wasn’t inconvenient.

        “10 minutes of online research will give you private/hacked photos of holidays with family together, parties, NOT PR pictures”

        Sure it will. Like I said, they are friends. With friends in common. Four years is a long time, why wouldn’t they hang out together? And any time they’ve kissed or tried to play the happy couple in public, they both look incredibly awkward.

        “This fake relationship accusation is tiresome, and frankly I find it ridiculous.”

        Why is it so hard to believe that this rather convenient relationship might be fake? It’s hollywood, gay men hire beards and hide in the closet, older actresses hire ‘toyboy’ companions to maintain a younger image, and co-stars in billion dollar franchises ‘date’. It’s not that ridiculous at all.

      • mln76 says:

        Here is the thing they’ve almost never claimed to be in a relationship(except K-Stew in her most desperate moment)… People often claimed it was to protect their privacy, what if it was simply because it wasn’t really true? What if they hooked up a couple of times but were mostly together because the studio and fan base demanded it?

      • Anname says:

        I am repeating myself here, but if you actually look at their history for the last 3 years, it is so obvious. I could list photo after photo but it really wouldn’t matter would it?
        Hacked private photos (never published,not intended to been seen) are not taken for PR purposes.
        I am a Rob fan (obviously), partly because I feel like he seems to be more real and genuine than most actors out there, and accusations of fakeness bug me. I am going to shut up now, I have been crabby all day, sorry to bring it here too!

    • isis00 says:

      I co-sign this! Sorry I didn’t see your post before I posted my comment. I agree 1000%, studio-created relationships are the norm in Hollyweird.

  17. diana says:

    Gonna watch OTR… Love the book, but I heard the movie was crap. Still…

  18. diana says:

    Gonna watch OTR… Love the book, but I heard the movie was crap. Still…

    Cheer up sparkles. Hope he jokes about this whole thing, which will help to reduce the awkwardness in rest of the junket.

  19. Adeli says:

    Meh. Just more tabloid BS. I seriously doubt anybody from Rob’s camp is talking to gossip sites, much less Radaronline. His people and especially those really close to him don’t roll like that. It’s more likely that these “sources” talking about a possible reconciliation are from Kristen’s PR team trying to keep robsten alive for the twiloonies and portray Kristen as redeemable by pushing the “Rob still loves her” angle. It’s sickening really; all it does is demonstrate how manipulative they, and Kristen, are willing to be to keep the robsten fans on side. Nothing should be believed until it comes from Rob himself or his rep. So far the only thing his rep has confirmed is that Rob asked Kristen to move out of his house. That speaks volumes to me.

    I have a feeling he’s going to come out swinging like a champ to promote the shit out of Cosmopolis and he won’t address his relationship status, true to form.

  20. Chris says:

    Kristen only wants her kicks with old farts that will praise her for being youthful and feed her ego. Someone like Garrett Hedlund seems way too young and discerning in taste for her.

  21. NM6804 says:

    If he does decide, he’ll get over it. Please, he’s a moviestar with hot looks (not my cup of tea but apparently to some he’s hot, njeh). That said, he isn’t made of stone and breaking up because somebody abused your trust is NEVER easy. Until now, he seems to be the most mature of the two so I’m sure he won’t drown himself in his tears…

    They’re still young, breaking up it’s part of life’s experiences just like for any other human.

  22. Patricia says:

    Well it just depends on what he wants in a relationshiip – chaos or stability. She’s not going to change and will very likely do it again. So it’s just up to him now. It will be fun to watch that’s for sure. I say dump her.

  23. isis00 says:

    Does anyone not realize that the entire relationship is a studio creation? Kristen Stewart has been pretty much asexual, and Rob has been sleeping around for a long time now, including with his co-stars/sisters from the franchise. This kind of thing happens in Hollywood all the time. I’m guessing Kristen finally broke out of her asexual stint, but unfortunately with the wrong person. Therefore, the outrage against Kristen and the backlash is ridiculous, because once it comes out that this entire relationship is a fake, then we’ll all feel stupid for believing it.

    • Anname says:

      So you believe all the made-up blind items and faux-insider info that you read, is that how you have come to the conclusion that Rob sleeps around and Kristen is asexual?
      Rather than ithe simple explanation that it might have just been a private relationship, it MUST BE some weird convoluted 4 yr PR scam, for movies that need no PR.

      • isis00 says:

        Do you believe everything that comes out of Hollywood to be canon, then? It just couldn’t be possible, in your mind, that some Hollywood relationships are studio creations? Yes, because everything in Hollywood is for real…

      • Anname says:

        Isis – I have been fan of Rob for 3+ years, and have spent way too much time reading and watching his interviews, and believe that I have seen jsut about everything that is online about his relationship. That’s it – once you have seen the info out there, it is very clear it was real.
        Of course there are fake relationships in Hollywood, with lots of coffee dates and photographs too. I have NEVER seen Rob take part in something like that.

    • mln76 says:

      Hello??? does the fact that Kristen slept with the husband of a woman she actually knew with-with very young children give you even a little bit of pause???? RP was probably dogging around but he was smart about it and there were no young families broken up as a result.
      I don’t hate Kristen or even think R-Patz is some great victim but please let’s not gloss over how horrid what she (and Rupert)did actually was.

      • The Original Mia says:

        Exactly! Goodness. So what if he was sleeping with randoms? Those randoms didn’t have a spouse and kids. Kristen and Rupert were the architects of their own downfalls & vilifications. They chose to screw around in full view of the public without a concern for the people they were supposedly committed to.

      • geekychick says:

        But, if their relationship WAS real and not PR, how is it okay if he was dogging around? yes, it’s worse to cheat with someone married, the worst when you’re married-but any kind of cheating is wrong in my book.

      • mln76 says:

        @Geekychick I don’t think dogging around on your girlfriend is right. But I think it’s a different thing for young people in their early 20s to mess around on their partners (whom they are probably being pressured to date by movie studios).Then it is to mess around with someone not only married but married w/young kids. If Rupert was single I quite honestly would say K-stew and R-Patz were even and wouldn’t care that much.

      • isis00 says:

        Did you see me gloss over or excuse what she did? No, you didn’t. And I don’t excuse what she did. What I was pointing out was that, while everybody thinks that Robert Pattinson is a victim, he is not, because the relationship is a fake from the beginning. The only victims here are Liberty and her children.

  24. IzzyB says:

    I found this pretty entertaining. This girl does a really good KStew.

    “Charlize Thermos”…hahaha

  25. Chris says:

    Nothing in life is a surety but I’m almost 100% sure Rob is done with her. He’ll forgive her and treat her cordially in public but he’s done with her. There’s no going back for Rob from something like this even if he cares about her. He’s young, hot and rich. Why would he settle for this nonsense? She can be his friend in the end if he likes her as a person after all of this. He’s always struck me as someone that was into blondes anyway.

  26. renata says:

    If there is any “forgiveness” it’s just for the promotion of BD2. Though I’d love to know what Summit has to twist his arm into that “forgiveness” since it makes him look like a complete and utter wussy. Even if this was a showmance all along (maybe, maybe not) I think the fooling around with Rupert was real and no matter how you slice it, it makes Pattinson look bad.

    Any future as an action hero in the next megawatt comic book franchise goes down the toilet the second he makes goo goo eyes at Stewie. Forget Batman when Bale retires. We’re talking more like Batgirl. Maybe even Batpuppy 🙂

    He should know better and recognize at this point she’s really bad for his image. If he has a brain that sees anything other than twihard dollar signs he will move along. Quickly. Besides, there’s a whole world of 40 year old married dudes Stewie can be happy with.

    • Janet says:

      ^^^This in spades.

    • Shannon1972 says:

      Yes, exactly! Been saying that since the beginning of this mess. 🙂

    • geekychick says:

      Yeah, but what does that say about gender stereotypes today? Wwhy does he have to be a p*ssy if he “forgives” her? Is Victoria Beckham considered a meek woman because she forgave Beckham? No, she isn’t. But if a man forgives woman for cheating, he’s a wimp.
      (No, I don’t think he’ll forgive her, and I’m not totally sure there ain’t some PR-plot in all this mess)

      • radishred says:

        This is what pisses me off.

        So many women forgive men for cheating and nobody thinks anything of it. But god forbid a man forgive a woman for cheating!

        My boyfriend forgave me for cheating on him, and I don’t think it made him any less of a man. If anything, it made him more of man to be able to set his ego aside and not let his pride influence his decision to forgive me and give me a second chance.

      • renata says:

        @geekychick & radishred — If the shoe was on the other foot and Pattinson had been caught cheating on Stewart I would have said no differently were Stewart to have considered taking Pattinson back. I would have thought, ‘ms. tough girl turned out to be a total wimp’!

        For me personally, there are only two circumstances under which I would ever consider staying with someone that had cheated. First, if they owned up to me completely on their own, without having been caught, since that would tell me they found it too difficult to live with being dishonest with me, which could in turn mean there was still something to work with.

        The second would be if someone was too poor to go out on their own and would have to unhappily bide their time in a bad relationship until they felt in a stronger position to leave. Any other circumstances and I would personally think of the person as a complete wuss who didn’t have the courage to open the door and start fresh. I understand those that might feel differently, but for me once trust is compromised it doesn’t really come back and I need to be with someone I feel I can trust.

        So, I ‘m sorry; in our society I can understand you jumping the gun and thinking it was some type of sexist conclusion I had reached. But in this instance you would be wrong, and it’s not what I was saying.

      • geekychick says:

        Renata, it wasn’t directed at you personally, sorry for that. It was directed at tons of comments on this (and many other sites) in that tone (he has to dump her, unless he’s a wimp). Personally, I wouldn’t stay with someone who cheated on me, because I know myself enough to know that I’m not a good enough person to get over it. I wouldn’t have the will, and I’m too jealous of a person to ever trust the cheater again. But, there are many types of people in this world, we are all individuals-and I won’t judge love choices of other people. (I will, like we all do, in everyday gossip and conversation-but I will always maintain that it’s a persons ultimate choice that matters). I think that’s one of the lessons I learned growing up-when I was a teen, everything was black and white. Now, not so much.

  27. Evelyn says:

    Can I tell you how upset I am at THIS is going to be the movie adaptation of on the road? It’s my favorite book and k stew is going to mouth-breathe all over it. Thats not because she’s a cheater, I just don’t think she can act her way out of a wet paper bag

  28. Jane says:

    Kaiser, what do you think to these claims in Jezebel:

    I could never imagine Rob as a chronic cheater as the source in the above article suggests, but then again I would never have thought Kristen would cheat with Rupert. Seems like whoever sent the email to Jezebel has a LOT of claims and corresponding evidence.


    • Janet says:

      It sounded more to me like a seriously demented Stewart fan fabricating bullshit stories to get her 15 minutes.

      • aquarius64 says:

        Agreed. This sounds like a Kristen fan trying to exonerate her idol, yet unable to present evidence (like photos) of her claims.

    • Adeli says:

      Jane, my thoughts are that you are a Kstew Stan trolling this thread, posting the insane ramblings of a truly disturbed individual in a pathetic attempt to deflect. That ridiculous laundry list of Rob’s supposed infidelities has been posted on several boards and Jezebel knows full well that it’s no “Hollywood insider” It’s the fabrication of a disturbed mind.

      Kaiser, I sincerely hope that this site will not stoop so low as to actually give any traction to that disgusting drivel.

      Kristen’s fans need to stop with their psychotic bullshit!

      I hope somebody has tracked the IP address of the person who posted that and hands it over to Rob’s team. There must be grounds for legal action.

    • renata says:

      I also read that. I’m not so sure I would buy into it, but I was amazed at the level of detail the author had accumulated. It was so meticulous you would think it was their doctoral thesis.

      Here’s the thing; in the days of Rock Hudson I think it was far easier for someone to maintain a secret, private life than it is today. You just didn’t have this sort of invasive approach to people in the limelight that’s so prevalent now. You also didn’t have the type of equipment and technology for spying on someone that’s available today. Given those circumstances, you could have someone like Hudson who had this whole secret, private life that there may have been whispers about, but for which there was no real proof.

      Pattinson would have to have combined extraordinary luck with a genius for detail to have gotten away with what that writer suggests has gone on with no firm proof having ever surfaced. Perhaps behind that ‘nice guy’ facade there’s some real Machiavellian nightmare going on, but he just doesn’t strike me as being that cunning or bright to pull that off as consistently as he would have had to in order to cover up so many affairs. Somewhere along the line, some real proof, like a photo, would have come out.

      So, I applaud the writers anal retentive, Columbo-like nature, but I don’t really buy into it without something a bit more firm to prove their point.

    • sallyreo says:

      @ Jane, I have read about Rob’s cheating in differnt gossip sites. The names he supposedly cheated with are always the same. Perhaps, there is something going on with Rob. The fact that he did not stay with Kristen while she was filming, and being suspicious of the director raises some questions.
      When someone cheats on someone, it’s because there is something missing in the relationship. I don’t buy that ” once a cheater, always a cheater” My husband cheated because I gained about 50 lbs, started my own buisiness and I came home tired, spent time with the kids and I fell sleep. He also liked the male companionship more than mine.
      I got fat and spent a lot of time working because I was not happy with the relationship. I should have divorced him, but I stayed because of the children. My adult son got after me not too long ago, he asked why did you stay with him, mom. Children need a happy, tranquil environment, children will feel the tension between the parents, lots of times it is better to divorce.
      Then,if Rob did all that cheating they say he did, don’t you think that KS would have heard about it. Yet, it has never been mentioned that she had any idea that he was cheating. Perhaps, they both were in an open relationship. Except, Kristen got caught, so Rob has to play the victim to add more drama to the story. At least,, until the movie is out.

    • Anna says:

      Yes, I heard these news on many gossip sites, but I’m having my doubts of these stories:

      1. There’s not a concrete proof of these “accusations”. No photos, no veridic testimonies or even a witness.
      2. All this kind of stories have contradictions between intersting facts like the MO of Pattinson’s flirts and places.

      So that gave me two conclusions:

      1. Or Pattinson is the smartest guy in Hollywood without any PR.
      2. These are just false lies from the rabbic Stewart fans for cleaning her image.

      Fun but disgusting fact: Recently I read one of these comments. This person said Stewart cheated Pattinson because he’s a small penis and she needs satisfaction. This was disgusting.

    • aquarius64 says:

      If Liberty files for divorce it’s Summit’s worst nightmare. Divorce proceedings only accelerate stories on this cheating scandal, and they will stay in the headlines all the way up to the premiere of Breaking Dawn 2. Liberty is under no obligation to hold off after the premiere. Plus, it depends on where she files – CA is no fault; I believe the UK you file for cause (in this case adultery). Stewart officially named co-respondent in the proceedings is a worse PR mess that the Mini-Cooper Makeout seen around the world. No matter where she files, dirty details will be revealed.

  29. lucy2 says:

    I’m guessing he’s done with her, but was told by the studio to not make anything official so as to not destroy the marketing for the stupid movie.
    IMO, he should be done with her. The cheating is bad enough, but the guy was married with kids. Forgive to find peace, maybe, but no need to stay in that type of relationship where the trust has been ruined. And that goes for Liberty too.
    That is, assuming, their relationship was for real and not PR.

    • sallyreo says:

      I think that Rob & kristin were supposed to break up at the end of last movie. What better way to end it than
      to have her cheating on poor Rob.

      • Kate (newer one) says:

        A few days ago you were posting that it was all just misdirection because they were about to get married on the Isle of Wight…

    • Rory says:

      Very sensible and logical and therefore probably close to the truth. 🙂

    • aquarius64 says:

      The marketing is going to be a mess anyway. Everytime a BD2 promo goes up the media will remind people of the cheating scandal. This is not going away, especially if there are new revelations. And everyone is going to check for body language during press conferences and red carpets and the press will write stories about that. Summit’s marketing team has a tough row to hoe.

  30. DANDILION says:

    Well pretty much they are both entirely experienced in their love lives and it’s up to them if this affair is the deal breaker.. I think he’ll keep her.. just because he loves her.

  31. Martin says:

    If Rob decides to stay with KS, then KS must do a few (sexual orifices) things that other vamp’s do not – perhaps similar to Pitt leaving Aniston for Jolie. A lot of guys have had this problem at one or more times in their life.

    Regardless of KS’ several orifices (excluding her ear canals, eye sockets and nostrils), Rob must do the right thing for Rob – find someone who will treat Rob with the same integrity, respect and fidelity as he treated KS.

    C’mon, Rob… YOU CAN DO IT!!


  32. kay says:

    I hope Kristen and Rob don’t get back together so that the sleazy media and paps can make their money following people no one cares about. This “I hate Kristen” thing is already getting old and people will move on from this scandal.
    Rob and a another girl will never be as popular as Rob and Kristen were. Robsten was popular because they mirrored the twi movies. Fans will move on and hopefully Kristen and Rob can lead a normal life away from this craziness.
    I don’t believe Kristen’s PR team planted rumors of a reconcilation, I think the media did. As soon as ET announced that Rob and Kristen split, this story died down considerably. Planting possible reconcilation rumors is just a way of stoking the fires of this story once again.

  33. Carolyn says:

    What a strange predicament…Rob has to go on national tv (which will be broadcast worldwide) to discuss how he feels about a fake relationship. But pretend it’s real and that he’s the hurt one. And everyone is waiting with baited breath. PR gold. Summit must be high-fiving themselves at how this is playing out. BD2’s tagline is “Forever”. I’m still tipping a hig reconciliation between the two of them just in time for the premiere. Afterwards they can do whatever they want.

    • A says:

      Agree. I used to think they were in a real relationship or in an open one, but too much weird shit about this story. Like the fact he supposedly didn’t know about the photos even though they were taken like a week or two before they were published. Please. No way, with that kind of a big story. I think he knew, and was just hoping it wouldn’t go public. Plus, I read that story on Jezebel…it did sound like a demented Kristen Stewart stan, but there were some valid points…For example, the LA Weekly ran this story on an actress who got kicked out of the Chateau Marmont for using twitter about some celebs…She later clarified that she was tweeting about Rob Pattinson getting up and close with some chick who wasn’t KStew. There were some weird points too about this strange touch feely pic with some model and how she claimed she is still really tight with him. Anyway, reading that whole crazy post reminded me that US Weekly had some photos like two years ago of him licking Anna Kendrick’s face looking smashed and somehow it all got squashed pretty quickly. I just don’t see a dude in a monogamous relationship licking another woman’s face or taking super touchy feely photos with another chick unless it’s like a relative or girlfriend. It’s weird.

      I’m sure he’s acting all heartbroken because that’s what his team told him to do. Gossip Cop and People are a PR person’s go to source, so you know they have been leaking those stories. I think Kristen did an incredibly f–ked up thing regardless (because of Liberty Ross getting hurt), but I’m kind of disappointed that RPattz is letting his team make him out to be some sort of heartbroken, betrayed, grieving man. Even if he was (which I highly doubt), I just think it would have been classier to have “sources” say something like Rob hopes the media will leave him alone in this complicated time while he deals with some personal problems.

      Anyway, I agree that there will be some big reunion sometime before the movie comes out and then they will go there separate ways two or three months after it’s released. And I’ll keep rolling my eyes at all the stories about poor, sad, heartbroken, perfect RPattz cheated on by that big, bad slut Kristen Stewart. The only person I feel bad for really is Liberty Ross and her kids, and even then I think Liberty handled the situation pretty poorly by going all social media and twitter about it.

    • Rory says:

      Yes. I wonder what the ratings will be for The Daily Show.

  34. Saddie says:

    It’s a mystery to be solved – since the truth isn’t willingly shared.When Rob didn’t show for the MTV-Best Kiss I knew they were done. Therefore KS was f-king SW director for some time and it wasn’t cheating, they were over by then. I do beleive Rob is gutted by this, he’s such a sweet guy. But it would seem KS has played around before and she will again. I still don’t think she’s the marrying kind. I do think her sex life with Rob was too tame for her liking, when KS likes it raw. Her priorities are career first, men are to be played with and not taken seriously – always in control of the situation.
    KS is 40 years old not 22 so this perpetual spin doctoring doesn’t sit with me, KS is always the driver of her public relations news, never the passenger.

    • sallyreo says:

      Or, perhaps KS has known about Rob’s cheating all along, maybe it has been an open relationship all this time.

      She just happened to get caught. Or, perhaps, she called the paps herself,
      to show Rob “if you can do it, I can
      do it better”. To piss him off, she
      issued the public statement.

      Now, both have to play the part of the
      movie in real life, so that the movie
      will be a success and then, they are done with all the acting.

    • A says:

      @Saddie…Yeah, but how do you know Rob Pattinson is such a sweet guy? Spin doctoring is going on there too. He’s given some interviews that made him look super douchey, and there have been some weird photos that for any other celeb would have been construed as cheating or being on drugs and numerous blind items that say he fucks around. Also, Kristen Stewart is 22, not 40. While I think it’s old enough to know better, she’s still young enough that the Rupert Sanders, who is old enough to be her father, comes off ickier. So I don’t think she has control of her PR machine.

      Personally, I doubt either one is particularly nice or angelic, although I’m still somewhat of a fan. I also suspect “PR” or an open relationship. I suspect both care far more about their careers than each other, hence RPattz’s team not issuing a bland statement or having “sources” leak a bland statement about how they hope the press leaves him alone in this hard time while he deals with this problem. Instead, his team is leaking all these stories to People and Gossip Cop that make him look like poor pathetic sap. His team is trying to make him into the male version of Sandra Bullock. It’s a bit distasteful, in my opinion. Sandra handled her drama in a much better and classier manner.

    • Chris says:

      Rob didn’t show for the movie awards because he had a premiere in Canada at the same time.

  35. Jaxx says:

    It takes real nerve to make a movie with a woman then turn around and boff her husband.

    • A says:

      That’s pretty much the only person I feel sorry for. All this stuff that has come out…I highly doubt Rob and Kristen were in a monogamous type of relationship, if in one at all. But Liberty got screwed over, even if she tweeted some shit which probably made it worse. Her husband is a predatory, disgusting pig of a man for sleeping with a girl who is young enough to be his daughter. Kristen stabbed her in the back, and should have known that acting like a dumb skanky naive ho would make it even more painful than for most who experience infidelity because it would be spread all over the media.

  36. jwoolman says:

    I don’t know their personal situation, but it can be possible to recover from such a thing. I knew a woman who got so disgusted with her husband’s frequent affairs that she had one of her own. During mandatory pre-divorce counseling, they both decided they had something worth salvaging. Took a long time to rebuild trust and of course they both had to give up the extracurricular activities – but they did it. Many years later, their relationship was much stronger than it ever had been and they honestly trusted each other. So it can happen, if both people are willing to work at it and are willing to change.

    • Chris says:

      Except Rob didn’t cheat and he’s young, rich and hot with thousands of women throwing themselves at him. He has no reason to salvage this mess.

  37. Madhubala says:

    Still not feeling sorry for KStew. She’s a Hollywood-hardened, grown woman who knows exactly how this sordid business works. All this nonsense about the director ‘having power over her’ is exactly that, nonsense. She got too cocky and arrogant with her “perfect” life, callously had an affair with a married man, got caught out and she’s now paying the price. Sounds fair to me. As for Pattinson, real relationship or not I hope he’s done with her ass. Life is too short for these sorts of games.

    • S_____ says:

      I suspect it’s people in their 20’s who are saying she’s a ‘grown woman’ in total control of the situation. Many commenters in their 40’s, like me, look back at that time and think “I was still a kid” and have a bit more sympathy for her in her youth.
      Yeah, she was a total bitch. But that ‘grown man’ Sanders is more to blame.

  38. Rory says:

    It’s good to see that people who last week were positive that Pattinson and Stewart were forever, that the pictures were photo shopped and that they were even getting married soon have begun to accept reality. Hopefully the crazier twihards will quit threatening people and posting slanderous trash in comment sections. The nasty and poisonous behavior of some has made me fear for Stewart. I think she’s hiding out because she’s frightened and I don’t blame her one bit. Some of these sickos are most likely dangerous.
    We now return to our regular scheduled programming.

  39. carlino altoviti says:

    The producers want to keep them together until the release of the movie, then… each for himself.

  40. Leila says:

    Why do you keep using Radar Online as your source. They are FULL OF CRAP! You would have much more credibility if you would just stop quoting them.
    I have no idea why that is your go to source for the R/K scandal. Get a better source.

  41. Janet says:

    The interview with Jon Stewart went pretty well. Pattinson looks like he is excited about his new movie. But as far as KStew is concerned, I got a definite vibe from him that she is history.

  42. I have been exploring for a little for any high-quality articles or
    blog posts in this kind of area . Exploring in Yahoo I eventually stumbled upon this website.
    Reading this information So i am happy to exhibit that I’ve an incredibly good uncanny feeling I discovered just what I needed. I most without a doubt will make certain to do not omit this website and provides it a glance regularly.