Prince Guillaume of Luxembourg marries Elie Saab-clad Countess Stephanie

I know most people will be like “WHO?” but please, for the love of God, do not comment with that thought. These are photos from the weekend wedding of Prince Guillaume of Luxembourg and his bride, a Belgian countess named Stephanie de Lannoy. Guillaume is the crown prince, the heir to the Luxembourg throne, and he will inherit the throne from his father, Henri, the Grand Duke of Luxembourg, which is the title given to Luxembourg’s monarch (I had to look all of that up). Stephanie de Lannoy was (is?) a Belgian national who will have to give up her citizenship to Belgium to become the consort to the Crown Prince, etc.

Basically, I’m only writing about this because I was looking at the wedding photos all weekend, and I wanted to talk about it. I really have no idea if Guillaume and his father are popular figures in Luxembourg, or if Stephanie is a kind of lazy, Waity kind of girl, but I think they seem like nice people if I’m just judging them from their wedding photos. According to Stephanie’s Wiki, she and Guilllaume dated for two years before he proposed this April. She has the European equivalent of a bachelor’s and a master’s degree, and she speaks French, English, German and Russian. She’s 28 years old – Guillaume is 30. Also: they’re distant cousins, so this really is an old-school type of royal wedding, where both sides of the family are all related somehow.

Stephanie wore an Elie Saab wedding gown, which I think is an interesting choice for a royal bride. I do like her gown a lot, although I like it less now that I’m seeing all of the Elie Saab design elements. Like, I could see Taylor Swift in a version of this. The bride also went backless… a bold choice, right? The back of the skirt has some kind double-tiered bustle, and her train was 13-feet long. And you know I always love when a wedding gown has sleeves – I just think sleeves are a lovely look on wedding gowns, but I err on the side of conservatism anyway. I think Stephanie is a pretty woman – but I like that she doesn’t look like a supermodel, you know? She looks refreshingly normal, and I mean that in a nice way. My favorite part of the bride’s ensemble? The tiara! That tiara is GORGEOUS.

According to The Mail, the service was conducted in French and English, and they had a moment of silence for Stephanie’s mother, who passed away in August. Sad. A lot of European royalty came out for the wedding, including Crown Princess Victoria of Sweden and Princess Caroline of Monaco. You can read more about the wedding here. I’m also including a photo of Stephanie and Guillaume at the fireworks show after their wedding – so cute. They’re really adorable together.

Photos courtesy of WENN.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

108 Responses to “Prince Guillaume of Luxembourg marries Elie Saab-clad Countess Stephanie”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. teehee says:

    I’m a belgian citizen, so Hooray for belgium and what a BEAUTIFUL dress!

    • Babalon says:

      That gown is GORGEOUS, OMG.

      • Belle says:

        ^^^^ This. The gown looks beautiful, as does the bride!!

      • hazeldazel says:

        omg, the dress and veil were so elegant! I hope the trend catches on over here in the US, seems like most wedding gowns are designed for 19 year olds, even though most of us get married when we’re older now.

      • Trek Girl says:

        @Hazeldazel: There are plenty, and I mean plenty, of designers who make dresses in that style over here. In most collections there are usually two or three dresses that have lace sleeves and a high neckline, or that offer boleros and covers that create that look. It’s not a new thing either; those styles and options have been available for a while.

    • Trashaddict says:

      Great dress, great head-dress! This is the best wedding gown I’ve seen in a while, and she has such a lovely face, it’s beautiful but distinctive.
      These quasi-military uniforms that male royalty wear, however — honestly they look like hotel doormen. Black tie and tails, please.

  2. marie says:

    that is a really pretty gown..

  3. Boo says:

    They ARE an adorable couple! I love her hair/headpiece/tiara. That’s the way to do royalty right. 🙂

  4. Marta says:

    btw, the european equivalent of a bachelor’s and a master’s degree is just that, a bachelor or a master

    • spugzbunny says:

      yeh that makes me wonder what she has then if it wasn’t recorded as a Bachelors and masters. I can only speak from the UK though. Maybe Belgium has a different naming system?

      EDT – wiki refers to it as a Masters

    • linlin says:

      Well, before the Bologna-Reform other degrees existed, now its only Bachelors and Masters. Maybe the writer was used to describe it that way because with people graduating some years ago they wouldn’t necessarily have had a Bachelor or Masters degree (like a Swiss person graudating 15 years ago would have the equivalent of a Bachelor and Master degree while somebody graduating today would have a Bachelor or Master degree), but since she graduated somehow recently she very likely has a Bachelor and Masters degree, especially since Wiki calls it a Master degree.

    • littlemissnaughty says:

      I’m about to get my MA (in Germany) and we still have students studying under the old system. Don’t ask me what they’ve been up to these past few years because my uni changed to BA/MA in 2006. So those students will graduate with a “Diplom”, which is the equivalent of a Masters. We never had anything less than that before the Bachelor was introduced.
      The whole thing is a hot mess btw. Don’t get me started.

      I caught some parts of the wedding on TV this weekend and it was cute. They looked really happy.

  5. Iggles says:

    Ah, I love Royal weddings!!!

    Wish these two the best of luck 🙂

  6. gee says:

    I’m obsessed with that dress, it’s so pretty.

    • spugzbunny says:

      agreed – it is stunning!

    • Amelia says:

      *sigh*
      You’d need a pretty huge church or cathedral to get a train that size down the aisle! Her bouquet is georgeous too.
      I love how genuinely happy they look on the balcony. Completely at ease with each other and loved up … Ahem.

  7. birdie says:

    Stunning gown! Kate’s dress looks cheap next to that. I am german and I have never heard of them, even though it is not far away. Congrats to them.

    • Kaye1 says:

      Disagree! I know there is a lot of hatred for Kate on this site but I thought her dress was lovely. This couple look great also.

      • bluhare says:

        Hatred? Wouldn’t go that far. However, I agree with you about the dress. I like Kate’s much better too.

      • Birdie says:

        @ Kaye1:
        This site is called CeleBITCHY. So if you can’t differentiate hatred from a bitchy comment, you shouldn’t come here. In fact I like Kate, I just stated my opinion on a dress. Duh

  8. Heather says:

    she looks so much more likeable then Waity, and the dress is lovely.

  9. lucy2 says:

    On a closeup I wasn’t sure about the gown, but in the full length shot? Gorgeous.

  10. Sombrero says:

    And she’s a blue blood, she was already a Countess before this wedding

  11. LadyLupton says:

    I love her dress, particularly that it’s backless. Nothing like a royal wedding, is there?

  12. Mara says:

    Wow her dress is stunning !

  13. Miss Bennett says:

    Every inch a lady. Truly lovely.

  14. Paloma says:

    A very nice looking couple. I love, love her hair.
    Hooray for decency!

  15. pomela says:

    Gorgeous, simply gorgeous. Total class this one, won’t be seeing her ass and tits out on a patio. She reminds me of Diana and some of the Princesses of yesteryear, dignified, demure elegance.

    • Aeli says:

      I’m not certain that dignified and demure are an appropriate description for Diana.

    • Trek Girl says:

      I hate to split hairs – well, not really – but it would be wrong of me to read your comment and not rebut it.

      Those princesses of yesteryear that you think are so elegant and demure – definitely not the kind of women that would be be caught naked on a balcony – are probably not as elegant and demure as they appear to be.
      It is very easy to have a high opinion of those princesses when you don’t actually know much about their private lives – certainly not in the way that we’ve come to know about Kate’s and even Diana’s.
      One needs to keep in mind that not hearing scandalous stories or seeing scandalous pictures doesn’t mean they didn’t happen and they don’t exist. Just a quick look into the history of royal families reveals that they have lots of skeletons in their closets, and there isn’t any reason to think that that’s changed or even gotten worse.

      Be hard on Kate all you want, but at least acknowledge the fact that she’s dealing with technology and a market for scandalous pictures and sensitive information that is different from what those other princesses dealt with; at least acknowledge that not seeing evidence of scandalous behaviour does not mean that there isn’t any.

  16. GoodCapon says:

    Here’s Part I of the wedding in case anyone’s interested:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HM3aZfMGxsk

    Stephanie wore a lovely gown and she’s a lovely bride. Her mother would have been very proud. I was teary-eyed when there was a minute’s silence for her mom.

    • lower-case deb says:

      @GoodCapon, thank you very much.
      i’m watching it as i type. still on the red carpet part.
      the one thing that strikes me most, is the difference between royalty and celebrity.
      these royals barely stop to have their picture taken. it’s like stop. nod. move. walk on by.

  17. Erinn says:

    On the thumbnail image for this post on the main page, I thought this was a teenaged girl.

    What a beautiful couple. I love the whole gown and hair combo… so pretty!

  18. Micki says:

    I like the dress but the bride looks just ordinary to me. In a way I think it’s a bad class if a noble born woman looks like a model. Most take concervative approach with clothes. But on the street – no one is going to turn after her, sorry.

    • Boo says:

      A PRINCE turned after her, so I suspect a “sorry” is not really warranted here. 🙂

      • Micki says:

        The lesser Royals are somehow expected to marry properly-means no commoners.And believe me the market is not full of georgeous young women with blue blood.
        Most of the German princesses I’ve seen in magazines are simply Uhg…uhg.. and then some more.Comes from inbreeding I guess. Even these two are distant cousins.Small world.

    • LAK says:

      to be fair, only Charlotte Casiriaghi and Carl Philip & Madelaine of Sweden are good looking. The rest are all homely. Only their titles and (hopefully) riches and access make them attractive.

      • Micki says:

        Very well summed up!
        The “new wave” brides look very well though. Apart from Mete Mari,t who I find a bit rough.
        If we compare Mary, Marie, Maxima, Letitia to the noble born…

      • taxi says:

        The Crown Prince of Greece (Pavlos?) is easy on the eyes!

    • JH says:

      Like I mentioned, with her hair down and in a coat…she is stunning.

  19. dandelion says:

    Love the dress, really like them. Demure is a great word for Stephanie’s style and after flashy princesses like Kate and Mary of Denmark, Stephanie’s quiet elegance is refreshing.

  20. Lemonade says:

    Can it be that royal weddings will bring back wedding dresses with sleeves? I work part time at a bridal boutique and everytime I try to suggest a dress with sleeves to someone they balk and choose strapless. I am so sick of strapless gowns for brides and bridesmaids lol Most women cannot pull them off (i.e. too top heavy, sausage arms look) even with alterations/spanx holding everything together.

    This dress looks gorgeous and I agree, Stephanie looks happy and beautiful.

    • Birdie says:

      I agree 100%. I am so tired of the strapless trend and how every woman thinks it suits them. It is tacky (imo) to go strapless in a church. It is sweet on a beach or some summer outside wedding though.

    • Abby says:

      i got married in Jan 2010, and fall 2009 I couldn’t find ANY dresses with sleeves that looked remotely chic, so I did the fit ‘n’ flare strapless thing. I wore a matching bolero for my photos. I’m sure after Kate’s wedding there were some. This too is a stunning dress.

    • j.eyre says:

      I used to be a bridal consultant as well – strapless is just not a look everyone can wear. My bust-line is not prohibitive for strapless but I have broad square shoulders. You put a strapless on my and the NFL is going to scout me. I had to put sleeves on my dress when I got married as there were few long or 3/4 sleeve options.

      I think they both looked wonderful. I love everything about her hair and headpiece

    • Suze says:

      Someone must still like strapless gowns because they sell a boatload of them. Even though almost every comment on every fashion/celeb site I go to (and that’s too many) is full of people stating how sick they are of them.

      I think some women can wear strapless very well, some can’t, and, regardless, that it is a trend that should have run it’s course by now. It’s been about ten years of solid strapless.

  21. Alison says:

    They are super cute and I totally agree with you about how she looks refreshingly ‘normal…’ I love the dress, tho I can also see it on Taylor in red (and maybe she has worn a shorter version of it??? I might be making that up.)

    However, those SHOES in the last picture are unbearable. WHAT ARE THOSE omg

    • Bluedog says:

      Yes, those SHOES! Horrid, especially when paired with thick, white hose. The shoes and hose totally ruin the look of her Chanel going-away outfit.

      Her wedding dress is just gorgeous, though! I wish more brides would take this demure and elegant approach. Strapless gowns are not appealing.

  22. backwards says:

    Waity wishes she looked this good!

    • Micki says:

      Oh, come on! I may bitch about Waity’s demeanor in general but she looked better as bride.

      • Suki says:

        Nope, not to me. Kate’s more the ‘TV version’ – thinner, hair-extensioned, teeth-bleached, tweaked. So refreshing to see a woman without that slightly hard/generic look.

      • Micki says:

        @Suki

        Ha, your “thin” really got me. In her Uni day Waity was sporty but not as thin as at the wedding. But she was thinner than this Stephinie even then.

        Her hair looks the same in all her photos through the years and she hasn’t been caught (to my knowledge) getting extensions.Do you have evidence for that or it’s a random opinion?

        And the bleeched teeth…Girl, even the commoners like me and you (me at least) go and bleech teeth. I don’t see how this makes her “tweaked”
        I mean will you complain that she exfoliates??

        I can’t believe I defend Waity but a bride doesn’t become a paragon of beauty and class because she’s NOT Kate Middleton

      • Belle says:

        @ Micki

        I’m not going hunting for them, but there have been many posts on this site showing before/after photos that do look like Kate wears hair extensions now. I’m no expert, and I know having a professional blow dry and style make a big difference…. but she looks ‘extensioned’ to me(;

        Oh and she REALLY thinned down for her wedding, even going public with her diet at the time. Probably no different from many other brides who want to be thinner for their wedding, but then she went overboard, imo.

      • Micki says:

        @Belle:
        UK press is very unforgiving.If there was any proof of extensions it will be all over the news.Especially now when she’s reaping so much negative reactions. There’s not enough respect left for the Royals to hide such tidbit I think.
        And I didn’t deny Waity’s “thinnification”, merely said she was in better shape than this bride even at coledge with “original” weight.

  23. Talie says:

    The marriage was apparently arranged on some level because, unlike William, he didn’t mix outside of his class. Hence the inbreeding…though, weirdly his father married a commoner. Yes, they are popular in Luxembourg and the only reason this got any press is because its such a wealthy little country.

  24. fabgrrl says:

    Lovely! A true Prince and Princess in a royal wedding. The 12 year old in me is squee-ing.

  25. teehee says:

    Well, *ALL* royal weddings get publicity.
    Maybe just not on YOUR television, so it has nothign to do with anything about the country itself and everything to do with the residents’ given interest in their royals. (or teh neighbors royals etc)

  26. L says:

    If you google their engagement pictures, it’s pretty obvious that these two adore each other. And 3 pretty passionate kisses on the balcony? Freaking adorable.

    She also wore Ellie Saab at the gala the night before (after the civil ceremony at the courthouse) http://royalweddings.hellomagazine.com/guillaume-luxembourg-stephanie-lannoy/news/201210191217/luxembourg-royal-wedding-gala-dinner/

    I loved her dress. The train in that huge cathedral was stunning. And the guests did pretty well to. Sophie looked awesome.

    And sleeves have always been pretty much the norm for royal weddings. Kate didn’t start a trend there by any means. Crown Princess Victoria’s dress is still my most favorite of the royal brides the last couple of years.

  27. hillbillyinthecorner says:

    What a lovely couple and a truly beautiful bride….
    Thank You Kiaser…after a weekend of Lohan Inc madness this is so refreshing..’
    This is true beauty …..

  28. Adrien says:

    There’s nothing ‘normal’ about the princess’looks. She’s so GORGEOUS!!! Ok she looks older than her 28 years, I thought she’s about the age of Patricia Clarkson but British royals would look like peasants standing next to her.

    • ANGELIC 20 says:

      +1 also she didn’t starve herself to look like a skeleton, she looks so fresh and kate’s dress looks so cheap when compared to this one.

  29. Sarah says:

    I like how the royals keep their original faces instead of getting their eyes lifted or noses bobbed off. Seriously, it’s refreshing! They can point to whatever distinctive feature and say “I got this from King Humperdink the Wise” or whatever. And they totally do.

    • Raven says:

      Now that’s a trend I’d like to see among celebs. I’m so tired of everyone looking the same.

      • Suki says:

        I second that. Wouldn’t it be great if real and defining features made a comeback…instead of everyone trying to be or be photoshopped the same?

  30. Shitler says:

    He’s from Luxembourg but his name sounds Spanish?? Confused. They look lovely & are obviously in love. Wish them all the best.

  31. I'm going to Guam! says:

    I’m so over these type of wedding dresses now.
    Ever since Kate Middleton started this trend everyone is doing the whole lacey with full sleeves look, it’s boring now.
    I’m sick of strapless too, don’t get me wrong but also this lace type wedding dresses with long sleeves.
    Can’t people think outside the box and what fun is it if you copy others looks!?
    Give me something new!

    • LAK says:

      Oh dear, you need to widen your references because this lace over bodice look was popularised by Princess Grace, back in the 50s, and really hollywood is to blame because her dress was designed by the inhouse designer of MGM ( or whichever studio she was contracted with) who in turn looked to the past for inspiration etc etc and so forth.

      As for the concept of white wedding dresses, we can blame Queen Victoria for that so really, no such thing as an original dress. Just variations on a theme!!!

      • I'm going to Guam! says:

        LAK, I KNOW.
        I know the origin of this type of dress but what I wrote was that this trend started to go buck wild after Kate wore it. And I have seen it on many brides since. And guess what?
        It’s B O R I N G.
        Lace + long sleeves = Trend and boring since everyone is doing it now.

    • Suze says:

      This dress and Kate’s are very different, hardly indicative of a long boring trend of similar dresses.

      I like them both although I like this overall look better – I much prefer Stephanie’s hair, veil and bouquet.

  32. Dimebox says:

    So elegant! I love the back of her hair and how her veil tucks into it. And that tiara…simply gorgeous. I saw another picture that showed her entire train and it was stunning.

  33. LAK says:

    I love weddings and other people’s wedding pictures. Watched this live at the weekend. It was beautiful. That dress is gorgeous and totally theatrical as needed for such a venue. Loved that they wove silver in the lace to give it that aged look.

    Loved dress,make up, hair. Was concerned about the backless part but I guess only us brits would care for such things, plus her veil covered it beautifully, and frankly if that is all I can nitpick about it…..at the end of the day,despite it’s size, it didn’t wear her.

    I loved, most of all, that these 2 were happy to be marrying each other. It showed in their body language/faces etc sod protocol and being proper.

    I hope they have long and happy lives together.

  34. ramona says:

    The Luxembourgish royal family are amazing people – really lovely and kind, extremely down-to-earth. I heard the wedding was a blast. Very happy for the whole family!

  35. lori says:

    I’m surprised by his beard. I thought most men in uniform were not allow to wear facial hair? But it suits him just the same.

  36. INeedANap says:

    She looks like a princess! Not exactly with her looks (though she is very pretty), but with the confidence and grace with which she carries herself. I agree that she doesn’t have that shellacked look Waity Katie has. And they look so happy! Mazel tov and blessings all around.

  37. JH says:

    She looks gorgeous with her hair down (click link to see). What a beautiful woman.

  38. Malificent says:

    Lovely all around. They look sweet and happy, and I love the backless dress. Business in the front and party in the back!

    But not grooving on the groom’s scruffy beard for a wedding. In everyday life, sure, why not. But if it’s your wedding day, either have a neat, full beard or shave. And if you can’t grow a full beard, then by all means go clean-shaven.

  39. it'sjustblanche says:

    That dress is gorgeous. I’m so tired of strapless gowns. You need a very definite type of body to carry if off (not necessarily slim, but toned) and most women end up looking sloppy in them.

  40. Chrissie says:

    I love this so so much but I really wish the bride would have gotten her roots done! As a fellow hi-lighted blonde like she is, it would have driven me crazy to not have gotten hi lights before the wedding.

  41. TG says:

    The dress is lovely, but at first look it reminded me of Kate’s. This is either a love match or an arranged marriage to keep it in the family because neither of them are attractive. It is always a disappointment when I see royals and paintings of them and they are fugly. It kills my fantasy.

  42. Louise says:

    wikipedia is awful, here is a good biography of the princess http://lux-arazzi.blogspot.com.br/2012/04/future-hereditary-grand-duchess.html she couldn’t be more different than waity. also she’s already good at luxembourgish and is going in a economic mission to china in about 3 weeks. and they are not related, they met through mutual friends

  43. The Original Mia says:

    I love her dress. It’s simply gorgeous.

  44. cc says:

    The dress, the hair: both perfect. What a classy bride.

  45. Mrs.Krabapple says:

    Beautiful bride, beautiful dress. I like that she doesn’t appear to be starving herself, or piling on the pancake makeup and eyeliner, or using fake tan cream, or botox. She looks like real royalty.

  46. GIGI says:

    What a lovely wedding! It looked like a real fairytale. Stephanie looked so regal and dignified all through her wedding despite the fact that her mother had passed away recently. I love that she and Guillaume decided to honor the memory of her mother with many references(such as that she wore her mother’s wedding ring and that a figure of Virgin Mary was also wearing her mother’s wedding veil) in their wedding.

    Without a doubt one of my favorite royal gowns behind Crown Princess Victoria of Sweden and of course Grace of Monaco ethereal wedding gown.

  47. Olly says:

    love her and the dress! she is actually much cooler and nicer than horse-veneers waity katy….

  48. apsutter says:

    They look great together and she is adorable. I LOVE that dress so very much. And I’m usually not much of an earring girl but I love the ones that she is wearing. Also the outfit she wore for their civil ceremony was also very cute.

  49. Fue McCormick says:

    … Wow … that gown is gorgeous!

  50. Sachi says:

    Now that dress IS couture. Just exquisite. The Daily Mail has a photo taken with the veil laid out on the altar steps and it was perfection. The details of the veil and dress can be seen from the large photo and the craftsmanship…wow.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2220578/Prince-Guillaume-marries-Countess-Stephanie-Lannoy-Luxembourg.html

    Of course, the DM being what it is, couldn’t resist to put a photo of Kate and William in there, only for it to backfire since most of the comments were ragging on Kate’s gown and many people said it looked so cheap compared to Stephanie’s.

    I watched this live, and it was a great wedding. The music selection was wonderful. The livestream/coverage was also well-done.

    I like that Stephanie didn’t look like an over-baked hot mess either. She looked fresh-faced, healthy, glowing, and very happy. She didn’t starve herself thin. She didn’t tan herself to an orange mess. She didn’t insist on doing her own hair and makeup (past photos reveal she’s not very good at applying her eyeshadow :D) and instead acquired the help of professionals so she looked her best on her special day.

    When she was on her way to the cathedral, she was waving to the people on the streets and she was just leaning from side to side trying to see everyone and wave back to them. She looked so excited and even a bit goofy. She was warm and spontaneous and didn’t come across as stilted and robotic. Just very graceful and elegant. No arrogance or smugness at all.

    Best moment was when she came to her father, who couldn’t walk her down the aisle as he wasn’t feeling well, and he was the one who truly “gave” her away to Guillaume. Just so sweet and also very sad as her mother passed away only a couple of weeks before.

    The groom’s mother, the Grand Duchess, looked so teary-eyed right from the moment she got off the car. She looked like she’d been crying all night. She was so happy and excited, too, blowing kisses at the bride and groom. 😀

    Most of the guests were well-dressed, too. Nobody was flashy, except Princess Maxima of the Netherlands but then that’s just her style, and everyone just looked nice. Best-dressed, IMO, are Princess Letizia of Spain and Princess Caroline of Monaco.

    It didn’t feel like a circus of “Who’s who” and “Who’s wearing what”. It was a lavish wedding, true, but it was also very simplistic and classy in its approach in that nothing was overdone and flashy.

    And now I leave you with a small clip of Stephanie almost tripping but getting a hold of herself and moving on as if nothing happened:

    http://gifsoup.com/view/4211540/good-reflexes.html

    She looked like she was just practicing her curtsey. 😉

  51. Loulou says:

    They look wholesome, natural and happy. It’s so refreshing for a change, in royal circles.

  52. Clydia says:

    Thanks to Sachi for the link.

    I like the dress the more I see it. And that veil-OMG. The tiara–breathtaking.

    The best thing is that the couple look radiantly happy to be together. Everything looks so much more fluid–less stiff and choreographed than Will and Kate’s wedding. The bride looked so healthy and pretty. The comparison photo of the British royals the DM showed really highlighted that. Theirs may have seemed a triumph then, but in the light of hindsight, not as much. Even their kiss was staged. Now it seems like Will… settled. This couple figured out in two years what Will and Kate couldn’t in 10.

  53. tmbg says:

    This is one of the most beautiful dresses I’ve seen in awhile. My tastes are at extreme ends of the spectrum – I either like the lacy, conservative Grace Kelly look or the simple slip dress like JFK Jr.’s wife wore. Anything in between doesn’t really appeal to me. And I love that she wore sleeves. Too many women need to back away from the strapless gowns.

    She also looks like a nice lady. There’s no way to tell what she’s really like of course, but she has a sweet face and her happiness seems so genuine.

  54. Camla says:

    LOVED the pictures! Cute couple; please keep us up to date on them

  55. lower-case deb says:

    thanks @Sachi for the DM link.
    and Lalla Salma’s blue dress. Wow. I wish I have a dress with that kind of blue in my wardrobe.

  56. A says:

    It’s interesting…Luxembourg is an incredibly wealthy country…They have the second highest GDP in the world. The royal wedding in Luxembourg cost about 500,000 Euros. The royal wedding in England cost around 20 million pounds….and another 10 million pounds in security, supposedly….The WSJ said something along the lines that England lost billions of dollars in revenue because of the holiday they created around the royal wedding, and the fact that the holiday came right after a holiday the weekend before.

    I’m perfectly aware that England is a country with a population 100 time greater than Luxembourg…That Luxembourg is tiny….However, I Just found the sheer excess of the English wedding a little disgusting…

    They are so much less stiff around each other than Will and Kate…I think Will and Kate love each other, but they seem to lack passion…The Princess of Morocco, Lalla Salma, is so beautiful and I love her blue dress..Besides the Spanish royals and Queen Rania, she’s one of my favorite royals…It interesting how much more educated the Spanish royals, Queen Rania, Lalla Salma, and even the Luxembourg royals are compared to the English royals.

  57. Suzie says:

    The grey, textured, long sleeved, low-backed dress she wore at the reception is spectacular, better than the wedding dress itself, although the wedding dress, also textured, is beautiful in its simplicity. A truly stunning choice of gowns, the best I’ve seen on any bride for as long as I can remember, and well worthy of comment here. Her up-do is also fabulous for the occasion.

  58. danielle says:

    her dress is absolutely stunning. it’s ridiculously gorgeous!

  59. Allison says:

    now this is what one would call a real princess and real royalty. she has style and grace and is so intelligent. she can speak six languages fluently and wasn’t a waity all her life. plus: she didn’t burnt her skin, starve herself to death, get horse-veneers and fake-a** extensions. all in all she has something that someone has to be born with, and it’s called grace and presence. no pretending, faking, naked-sunbathing…. period.

  60. mln89 says:

    i think the bodice portion of stephanie’s wedding dress (and kate’s) are ugly. i like sleevless and strapless wedding dresses better then these dresses that look stuffy and like they encase someone’s arms like sausage. the lace appliques on the veil were gorgeous and so was the train. i also think that stephanie looked pretty and that her hair looked really great when it was down for the civil ceremony. (much better then kate’s hair AND makeup during her wedding…why couldn’t she just use a professional?) the couple also really looked like they were in love.

  61. Mrs.Krabapple says:

    She’s not really a countess, right? I mean, her father was a count so her mother would have been the countess, but now the title is vacant (if her father ever remarries, his new wife becomes the countess; or, when he dies and his son becomes the count, the son’s wife will be countess). Some women inherit titles or are given titles by the monarch or parliament, or whoever has that power in a particular country. But since she’s the youngest of all the children, I doubt she holds any titles of her own.

    Of course, she’s now a princess by virtue of her marriage.

    • macrobug says:

      She is/was a Countess. You are confusing the British way with the Belgium. A daughter of a Count is a Countess. Very common in continental Europe.

      Love the dress, love her “real” woman looks. She will age very very well.

  62. lower-case deb says:

    according to wikipedia, she was born a Countess.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stéphanie_de_Lannoy

    does it have to do with her family being one of the ancient families? i tried to look at the other wikipedia pages linked there, such as the difference between imperial/princely counts (who is on par with the title prince) and non-prince counts.

    so confusing.