Liev Schreiber followed Naomi Watts for 3 years ‘being manny to the children’

Liev Schreiber has a new interview with Vulture (NY Mag) to promote his new Showtime series, Ray Donovan. When I had Showtime last year, I remember seeing the ads and promos for the show, and it looked… dark. Heavy. Depressing. I have no idea if it’s going to be a hit – I’m bad at predicting that kind of stuff, I think I predicted that no one would be interested in Breaking Bad. It looks like a “guy show”. Like, if you’re a dude and you love Goodfellas and wish it had more angst and Jon Voight, then this show is your kind of thing. What’s interesting about this Vulture piece is that Liev is… honest? Is that the right word? I mean, he’s strangely cryptic about some things, and you can tell that he has a really dry, biting wit. But I feel like there’s probably some anger or something else (?) behind the wit. You can read the full piece here, and here are some highlights:

He’s a boxer: “I have the kind of face that people want to punch.”

He’s on a new diet: “I grew up vegetarian, and when my grandfather first gave me some pastrami, I remember thinking, Holy shit, where have I been? So I’ve always been skeptical about nutrition, but this is really working.”

Why he plays bad guys: “I have Slavic fat pads that make me look like a chipmunk and arched predatory eyebrows,” says the actor, who is a stew of Russian and Middle European bloodlines. “With that, you’re not going to get funny. That’s why I play so many bad guys.”

Theater work, TV work: “Theater is consistent. You ride your bike to work. You get most of the day off so you can see your kids. My problem is that after three months I go mad. One of the reasons I never thought I could do a TV show is that I hate doing the same thing over and over again.” But that’s also why he signed up for Ray Donovan: “Part of me always feels like things should be hard.”

His character Ray Donovan: “She writes about violence, vulnerability, and the façade of machismo in a glossy, sexy way, but with depth, duality, and humanity,” he explains. “He’s very lonely and very isolated. The contract of marriage, sexuality, relationships, all of that stuff is outdated. Every other social group has gotten an upgrade except for the average white man, and Ray is working on old software, functioning in a world that no longer appreciates men as breadwinners and warriors, and there is a lot of pain in that.”

Living in LA for the show: “I’m f–king homesick,” confesses this child of the Lower East Side. “I miss New Yorkers. I miss the bustle, having people around to walk on the street and look at.”

He never wanted to leave NYC: “When we met, I said to Naomi, ‘I am really crazy about you, but I don’t know that I can live in L.A., and is that okay?’” That was in 2005. She rented her house and went to work on The Painted Veil. “Naomi forced them to hire me. She wanted to continue our relationship, and the only way to do that was to take me on the road with her,” Schreiber says with such a delighted twinkle in his eye that I ask if he’s busting chops. He’s not, he insists: “We wanted to be together, and I’m decent enough to handle that role. It wasn’t, like, total nepotism.”

He describes himself as a manny: Thereafter, he followed her around for three years, “traveling the world and being manny to the children.” Together, they seem to be the rare celebrity couple that people genuinely admire. “I get photographed a lot with my children,” he says. “People see me take them to school, and they seem to like that.”

Why they haven’t gotten married: They have not married, Schreiber confirms. “It’s complicated,” he says tersely, “and it’s private, too.”

On parenting: “It has made me a better person in fits and starts,” he says. “I had been a very selfish person most of my life, and that shifts quickly and dramatically. It’s painful and fascinating and ultimately really wonderful, but I am particularly lucky because I have exquisitely beautiful, talented, brilliant children,” he says, grinning. “If I had had ugly, stupid children, it would’ve been difficult to turn that corner.”

[From Vulture]

“It’s complicated,” he says tersely, “and it’s private, too.” Hunh. Historically, I read Naomi and Liev’s relationship as her being more up for something traditional, that she wanted to get married more than him, and that he was the one saying “If it ain’t broke…” But this makes me wonder. You know Liev was pretty much Naomi’s rebound after Heath Ledger, right? One day Naomi and Heath were together and the next day, Michelle Williams was knocked up and Naomi was with Schreiber. Okay, so maybe my version of the timeline is a little bit off, but I do remember that both Naomi and Heath moved on very quickly.

Oh, and I hate when fathers refer to themselves as the “manny”. You’re not a GD nanny, you’re a FATHER.

Here are some photos of Liev from NY Mag:

Photos courtesy of WENN, NY Mag.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

83 Responses to “Liev Schreiber followed Naomi Watts for 3 years ‘being manny to the children’”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. brin says:

    Are he and Naomi even together? Some blinds and speculation that they are not.

    • e.non says:

      i recall a story of him cheating with someone on a recent film…

      • Rachel says:

        He cheated. Openly. This father of two young children. His reps aggressively went after every media outlet who reported on it (that’s why you don’t see them mentioning it here. No one wants to be sued) Amusingly though, it stayed up in the Australian media even after it came down everywhere else. They knew it was true and took a ‘come and get me bro’ attitude. Loved it!

      • Virgilia Coriolanus says:

        Ugh, I just looked it up. Apparently it was with the body double of his costar, her name is Phoebe Price. According to them, the entire town knew/knows about it and are shocked..it was on the filmset of “Mental”.

        And in the article, they said that his rep was going after people who were reporting it. Which makes me think its true. I mean it’s one thing to go to gossip cop and deny something, but to go after all the bloggers and gossip sites out there. It’s not like it was on CNN or anything. Either he’s really insecure or he’s a cheater. A blatant one, at that. Naomi should dump his ass.

      • Lindsay says:

        Her name is Phoebe Roberts. She is much prettier than Phoebe Price. If you read D-Listed you’d know who she was. Kind of the first Courtney Stodden with crazy outfit and always wearing lucite stripper heels come to think about it.

      • Ally8 says:

        Phoebe ROBERTS, young blonde, not Phoebe Price, aged red carpet loiterer.

        http://www.x17online.com/celebrities/naomi_watts/liev_schreiber_cheated_cheting_naomi_watts_scandal_10911.php

      • Nina W says:

        Oh yeah and Australian tabloids are so credible.

    • mata says:

      He’s pretty much a known cheater, but the separation blinds aren’t about them. There were recent pictures/film of them out to dinner with Simon Baker and his wife. The only reason I remember is because a waiter went off on a paparazzi that was harassing Naomi.

    • Kosmos says:

      Noooo, I hate to hear this kind of thing. Why cheat? If you love and respect your partner, just do the right thing and keep it between the two of you, right? Maybe I’m expecting too much….

  2. Willa says:

    I think he’s hot!

  3. Dorothy#1 says:

    I love him!! He always does a good interview. 🙂

  4. Anna says:

    I really like the fact that he’s the one who sort of put his career on hold to follow her around. It’s refreshing, because it really reverses the convention that woman usually makes career sacrifices for the sake of her man/relationship/family.

    • Leah says:

      Well to be fair she is the bigger star of the two she has been oscar nominated multiple times and is A-list so she would be the bigger earner too.

      • Anna says:

        Not guaranteed. She does lots of indies, women are generally underpaid in Hollywood, and LS did Wolverine and I think some other more mainstream/bigger-earning films. But good on them, regardless.

      • Leah says:

        Liev is not a name actor though. Naomi is.

      • Nina W says:

        Their fame levels are fairly comparable to me.

  5. marie says:

    I can’t help but like this guy and that voice, shut the front door. I’d hit it and it would be dirty and that would be okay.

    • Isa says:

      Woohoo the room just got HOT… Caliente.
      That’s just how I feel Marie. Locked me in a room with him for a day or two! Make it a week 😉

    • dena says:

      Me too. I would hit it hard and hit it often.

  6. LahdidahBaby says:

    I’ve always thought he was the one with the power in that relationship, and she more the one who wanted them to marry.

    I so agree about the manny thing, and I hate when men say they’re babysitting their kids! both things presume that the kids are the sole job of the mother, and the father is just helping out by doing HER job.

    • Tara says:

      Ugh!! Me too. My husband finally stopped saying he was babysitting our son when he was alone with him because I told him I was going to start calling him the babysitter. But he still doesn’t really get it. Selective, self-serving sexism I guess.

  7. Lucy2 says:

    That bugs me too, along with dads saying they’re babysitting. No, that’s parenting!
    Once you have kids together , I don’t understand what is so complicated about marriage. I don’t think it’s a necessity, but it sounds like they aren’t on the same page about it.
    I’ve heard his new show is good, I will check it out.

    • Micki says:

      I think with certain jobs the marriage logistics turns to be complicated. Not every family can just move around following mommy or daddy (speaking of actors).
      I have heard there are men ! who are abs. natural and great with children and want to be with their children all the time but I think most men have to be introduced to the “work” part behind the “sitting”. Many I know are fully stressed out by it.

    • Becky1 says:

      Agreed in regards to the whole “manny” thing. He’s a good actor but he seems like a douche.

    • Nina W says:

      I simply took it to mean he was doing the bulk of the child rearing, I certainly didn’t read sexism into it. Maybe it’s a stupid slang term but I think it’s over-reacting to a word. obviously the guy is a very involved father.

  8. Lulu77 says:

    Liev and Naomi have been together for years and have two kids. I think it’s a bit much to call them a rebound relationship since they don’t last long. It’s weird that he says he took 3 years off when it seems like he’s constantly in something.

  9. Jess says:

    The manny thing doesn’t bother me. How many women use the argument that them staying at home is free childcare? How is that any different? Either looking after your kids is comparable to childcare work or it isn’t.

    • emmie_a says:

      Maybe he FEELS like a manny bc Naomi isn’t putting her all into raising the kids? I don’t care how he wants to describe his role — He seems like a good parent and that’s all that matters.

    • linlin says:

      Many more women than men are the primary caregivers of their children, but I have never, ever read or heard a mother saying that she is the nanny of her children. Usually they just say that they are a stay-at-home mom or say “being a mother is my job right now”. So why doesn’t he just say something like that? That he is a stay-at-home-dad or that right now being a dad is his job or say, I am the primary caregiver? A manny or nanny is somebody who is hired to take care of the children for payment instead of the parents, not a parent taking care of their children!

      • Isa says:

        I agree with you Linlin.

      • Thundercloud says:

        Well said linlin

      • Nina W says:

        Come on, he used a slang term that describes the work he is doing with his kids, it wasn’t a referendum on his feelings as a father. It’s silly to criticize him over word choice when he is obviously a good and involved father.

  10. Micki says:

    His first photo reminds me a bit of Ray Stevenson and I adore the man.

    I like his frank way of saying things and I like when celebrities make compromises and make things work and get the ego-part in a thight grip. Makes them more human for me.

    • Irishae says:

      I love Ray and Liev so I automatically love your comment, too. 🙂

      I agree he gives a good interview. I don’t think he meant anything negative by “manny” and to imply he doesn’t think of himself as a father is a little silly and unnecessary. He probably heard it somewhere and thought it was cute. No harm done.

      • VV says:

        Also a Ray Stevenson fan and I like Liev as well 🙂 woo. Although reading about Liev on wiki was pretty eye opening. His childhood sounds INSANE. It makes me wonder if his upbringing is the cause for his avoiding the whole marriage thing.

  11. mata says:

    I think the marriage thing may have to do with the fact that both of them had kind of effed up childhoods due to their parents’ divorces. Maybe they don’t want to jinx anything.

  12. LSS says:

    Don’t know why but I’ve never liked this guy. I think there’s something really douchey about him. Love her though.

    • bns says:

      He always looks miserable, but he did say himself in the interview that he has a face you want to punch.

    • fingerbinger says:

      I don’t for him either. I like him as an actor,but there’s something about him that’s off.

  13. TG says:

    Good interview. I hope they are happy and stay happy.

  14. eliza says:

    He is right about one thing, because I want to punch his face.

  15. eliza says:

    He is right about one thing, because I want to slap him.

  16. Lucrezia says:

    RE: “busting chops” Hmmm … I thought that meant either nagging/berating or punching in the face.

    *double-checks, to make sure it doesn’t have some other meaning in the US*
    Nope. Still means punch or nag.

    How did that slip past the editors?

    • Jag says:

      It also can mean when someone is telling untruths just to be funny. 🙂

    • Julez says:

      I think it depends on context… I’ve always understood busting chops to mean teasing, too.

    • Nina W says:

      When you’re “busting someone’s chops”, you’re teasing them.

    • Lucrezia says:

      Oh, so it is an alternate US-usage. Thanks!

      (I did check, I swear … the main online dictionaries definitely don’t include “teasing” as a definition.)

      Over here we’d have said “taking the piss” or “yanking my chain” instead.

  17. mel says:

    I think he is hot in a bad boy kind of way…would totally hit it. Getting married is complicated…um no. Either you want to or you don’t. He or she probably doesn’t want to…..end of story.

    • Nina W says:

      So since it’s not complicated for you, that applies to everyone else as well? Good to know, I’ll pass the word.

  18. Ellen Smith says:

    He has been working steadily according to his credits on IMDB. Don’t know how that is “following around” Naomi. Seriously, just because he had to “man up” and start actually parenting his kids, he suddenly feels his career has taken a back seat to her career? Give me a break!

  19. dcypher1 says:

    I’d hit that.

  20. Thiajoka says:

    Hey, Schreiber, if they are your kids, you’re not acting as their “manny” you dolt, you’re acting as their father.

  21. Bodhi says:

    He didn’t put his career on hold, he has been working steadily since his kids were born, he just hasn’t worked as much as Naomi

  22. megsie says:

    He obviously didn’t put his career on ice, but he did work around Naomi.

    Naomi is a fine actress, one of my favorites, but I don’t think she’s as easy to live with as some imagine. She gets sympathy press over Liev’s not entirely faithful ways and she got a lot of sympathy press over the Heath Ledger break up eg Poor Naomi wanted to settle down and Heath dropped her for Michelle. I don’t believe it went down quite that way.

  23. MsAubra says:

    Liev is GORGEOUS! He looks a little like Bradley Cooper in the face, so that’s probably why he comes off serial killer-looking to some of you! LOL

  24. Brat says:

    “Oh, and I hate when fathers refer to themselves as the “manny”. You’re not a GD nanny, you’re a FATHER.”

    This is exactly what I came to say when I saw the link to this story

    • lolalola3 says:

      Brat, that’s EXACTLY what I thought! He’s not the hired hand. Its being a parent.

  25. Nerd Alert says:

    Maybe he just doesn’t want to get married, or maybe she doesn’t. That does make it complicated, when one doesn’t want to get married but they are still in love and have children. Maybe neither of them does. It’s whatever, doesn’t mean there’s something wrong.

    Anyway, no comment on the manny thing but I think it’s good he took care of the kids. She’s got a much more promising career than him, due to the niche he described primarily.

  26. lolalola3 says:

    “Manny”? Sorry dude, its called being a dad with a working baby-mama. Welcome to the new millennium. Better late than never.

  27. Holden says:

    I think there’s a couple of celebrity couples that have figured out that their relationships and children benefit when one takes turns working and the other one takes a break. Good for them, I think a lot of us would love that kind of flexibility.

  28. Ag says:

    Kaiser, YES! You’re a goddamn father to your children, dude, NOT their nanny! Being with them, raising them, is, you know, being a parent. Wtf?!

  29. Slm says:

    Thank you for picking up on the manny thing!!

  30. Bijlee says:

    He sounds like a douche

  31. DreamyK says:

    I liked him a lot better when he kept his mouth shut. What an ass. Naomi, you have 2 beautiful children, mostly thanks to your stunning good looks..why in hell are you with this insufferable tw*twaffle?

  32. Maggie says:

    ick! I find nothing remotely attractive about this man. He’s so ugly!

  33. i says:

    The “manny”-ing
    or
    idea of “babysitting” your own kid is illogical to say the least.
    As a friend of mine says “it’s like society is just thrilled if the father shows up”.

  34. Kristen says:

    When I was pregnant with my son 8 years ago, I had recurring dreams where Liev Schreiber was just hanging out in my living room naked. Not doing anything really. Just chilling with no clothes on. That’s all I got. lol

  35. mimi says:

    He is extremely talented, and she is a class act and beautiful (he looks good too).

    I read he had some very difficult family history and childhood so he might have issues.

    He is a father and should understand that that is his role to be there for his children.

    I don’t know why they do not marry, but the really important thing is how he treats her and how he is as a father.

  36. Jennifer12 says:

    He is completely sexy; I’ve thought so since “Party Girl”. But any man that refers to himself as his sons’ many needs to be smacked. I’d want to hit it, but I’d want him to leave right afterwards.

  37. Nina W says:

    I cannot understand the “manny” over reaction. It’s a stupid slang term and for one word he’s to be criticized as a bad father? Honestly I simply took it to mean he was the one doing the bulk of diaper duty and it barely registered at all. I don’t really see it as a loaded term. Maybe it would sound odd for a woman to say she was the nanny, haha, but I doubt I would get out the pitchforks if she did.

  38. Anne De Vries says:

    I tend to like him, but yeah, that manny thing drives me nuts. It implies that he feels it was really Naomi who should have been the primary caregiver. You’re their FATHER you moron.