Jaimie Alexander in Azzaro Couture at ‘Thor’ LA premiere: trashy or sexy?

wenn20818056

Wow, I guess Jaimie Alexander needs some attention, right? Here are some photos of Jaimie (I can’t even start with how she spells her name) at last night’s LA premiere of Thor 2: The Dark World. The dress is Azzaro Couture, and it rivals Gwyneth Paltrow’s now-infamous Antonio Berardi gown at the Iron Man 3 premiere earlier this year. Gwyneth’s gown was so revealing that Gwyneth admitted that she had to shave her Goop-muff. I’m assuming Jaimie had to do the same, because Jesus Christ, I really didn’t need to see her shadowy mons this morning. The girl’s got an amazing body, for sure. But I think this is super-trashy and “look at me, I’m a movie star, pay attention!”

Speaking of her movie star dreams/reality, Jaimie is trying to start a BIG rumor about a future project – apparently, when she was promoting Thor during a panel discussion, she left some hints about possibly being approached to play Wonder Woman in Batman vs. Superman (with Ben Affleck and Henry Cavill). You can read more about it here at Forbes. I think it’s possible that they would want Jaimie… she’s got the look, she’s into stunt work, etc. We’ll see.

I’m also including photos of Kat Dennings in Naeem Khan. I’m meh on her dress.

wenn20817863

wenn20818057

wenn20819052

Photos courtesy of WENN.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

135 Responses to “Jaimie Alexander in Azzaro Couture at ‘Thor’ LA premiere: trashy or sexy?”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Maureen says:

    I don’t even know who she is but GOD that dress is HORRIBLE.

    • Maureen says:

      In that 3rd picture down — the one right under Kat Dennings — where she’s turned to the side you can totally see her (bare) pubic area. GROSS. That dress doesn’t have even 1 centimeter of room to move without a reproductive part showing.

      • Buckwild says:

        Oh god. Saw it.

      • Malificent says:

        Once seen — never to be unseen!

      • aemish says:

        I second that emotion! At first I thought it was stunning but then I realized had I been there in person I would have been forced to view her actual VAGINA. Didn’t sign up for that, whatever-your-name-is actress from Thor!

      • Erandyn says:

        I wonder if it’s even possible to sit in that thing… o.O

      • Maureen says:

        There are pictures out there that are even worse than the one I pointed out. Dlisted has some. THIS one is so bad you can see her entire parts. I have to say I never thought I’d be shocked by anything someone in Hollywood does — but this one shocks me: http://imgur.com/eCVBpqm

        If that link didn’t work, then it’s this one. “Smiling shaved sn*tch” is where the picture is hidden. Sad, really. Can’t imagine what went through her mind when she put this dress on. http://dlisted.com/2013/11/05/like-all-legends-do-the-slut-dress-has-reinvented-itself-once-again/

      • Meredith says:

        She has a lovely body and the dress would have been fine if it had stopped after showing about 50% of what it shows. And I agree that a dress that shows any part of your (freshly waxed) pubic area is a dress that you should leave at home in the “naughty” part of your closet.

      • carol says:

        eh who cares?

      • deehunny says:

        @Meredith: I agree. The dress would have been a show stopper if it stopped where it does on the left side and was solid throughout the leg. That way, no mons, a only the top of the ass crack in the back would peak-a-boo. Still controversial, but not skankalicious.

      • mytbean says:

        Oo

        Holy Canoli! Well. She topped Miley Cyrus in this department I guess. HOW is this not indecent exposure in public??

        Maybe the fabric was one of those sheer but not so sheer until the flashes went off? :/

    • BooBooLaRue says:

      +1

      • mimi says:

        I didn’t know who she was either when I saw these pictures. At first, I only saw the front of the gown and thought it was way too revealing. I nearly fell over when I saw the back and sides. She left absolutely nothing to the imagination. It’s a shame because she is very beautiful and has a nice figure. She needs to fire her stylist STAT!

      • Petrichoria says:

        Oh no, she’s popping a cork with her stylist and thanking him/her for getting her name (and mirkin) awlll over the internet. I’m actually surprised she wasn’t just wearing a sign pointing to her fourchette saying ‘MIGHTY HAMMER GOES HERE’.

    • Decloo says:

      If an actress walked onto the red carpet stark naked, would she be arrested? Or would the photogs all snap away like it was no big deal?

  2. Lucy Goosey says:

    I like it! I think it is sexy and original. I like the print on Kat Dennings but something seems off with the shape.

    • SpringisHere says:

      Original? Isn’t this the same designer as Goop’s cut out dress at the Iron Man premiere? And didn’t another actress recently wear something similar, I forget where.

      • kellie says:

        its a Stella McCartney rip off. all hers were short, and it may have even been last years design. I thought this dress was this years incarnation of it.

    • glaugh says:

      I like it too! The mesh panelled dresses are huge…

      GIRL, YOU CAN WORK IT IF U WANT. You have the body for it, so make a statement. Why not?

      Look at what Cher used to wear for f’s sakes.

  3. Hannah says:

    Who would have thought that you can show off your breasts AND legs in a floor-length, high-neck dress?

    • Leigh_S says:

      Breast, legs, ass AND crotch. Its really quite a feat, when you consider it.
      I was about to give the dress a tentative pass thinking it only showed from the front and then saw the partial side photo followed by back shot. Horrible dress.

      • joespider23@gmail.com says:

        I’m glad you used the word “crotch” – those using the word vagina to describe what was on view here have a funny idea of anatomy.

  4. Dani2 says:

    I was prepared to come here and be open-minded but damn! That is A LOT of skin, I’m sorry but it just reeks of desperation to me, I mean, she is pretty forgettable so I can kinda see why she did it. What is she in besides Thor?

  5. bns says:

    Not trashy at all. People need to stop criticizing women who want to show off their bodies. More power to them.

    • Nessa says:

      Yeah, but there is a way to do it without showing all the goods. It’s called leaving something to the imagination. Especially since this girl is ridiculously gorgeous. She doesn’t have to show her body like that to get attention.

    • Avilita says:

      Being naked is not that empowering. Many women are buying that line these days.
      When every man is in a suit and you’re butt naked, don’t expect to be taken seriously.

      • Cazzee says:

        Thank you for saying this!

      • bns says:

        1) She isn’t naked.

        2) Being naked might not be empowering for you, but having the freedom to do what you choose with your own body is, indeed, empowering for some women.

      • Pip says:

        “When every man is in a suit and you’re butt naked, don’t expect to be taken seriously.”

        This. A million times. Sometimes I feel as if I’m the only woman left who believes this. Thank you.

      • Mia4S says:

        Gold star to @Avalita! You take a man in a suit more seriously than a man in jogging pants, same idea. Honestly you think most people are looking at the outfit going, wow empowered woman!? Nope. Women are all over the board with reactions and most men are going “yeah, show some more boob! Yay empowerment!” She’s getting PR, that’s fine, but stop the “empowerment” lie. She’s another Hollywood piece of meat.

        Fair? No. Reality? Yes.

      • aemish says:

        What Avilita said!!

      • GIRLFACE says:

        SERIOUSLY. THIS^ Showing more boob to establish yourself as a woman who is “comfortable with her sexuality” had to be a man’s idea, please. Her dress honestly looks like something in the back of a 1990′s VS catalog. Majorly tacky. Also, I feel like I don’t know who she is enough to see her va-j. Is this the new norm? Female actresses will be introduced to the public ass first?

      • Original N says:

        +1 Empowerment is not objectification …

      • Miss Jupitero says:

        She wouldn’t be wearing it though if it did not bring her attention, and in this industry it seems that any attention is good for the career.

      • dahlianoir says:

        Exactly !

      • glaugh says:

        IT IS EMPOWERING FOR SOME.

    • Gin Genie says:

      She’s free to wear whatever she wants, and great for her if she finds it empowering, The flip side is that people are free to comment whatever they like, you can’t have one freedom without the other. For my part I not only think that it’s desperate and trashy, I think moves like this perpetuate the idea that this is all women are valued for, particularly in Hollywood. On another note, why are we supposed to give her a pass on an outfit that could conceivably lead to a charge for indecent exposure if an average person wore it?

      • bns says:

        Having the freedom to criticize someone for doing/wearing something that you may not like does not make it okay for people to use words like “trashy” “slut” and “wh-re” against them. People usually only do this when there’s a woman involved. See: Miley Cyrus.

        *I’m not saying that you said it was okay to use those words, but that was basically the point I was trying to make in my original comment.

    • Andrea says:

      The flip side is that female exploitation is a real and serious thing and it’s pathetic that women have to be nude to have people talk about them.

      That’s not empowering.

  6. MsGoblin says:

    Tasteless.

  7. blue marie says:

    Am I supposed to know who she is? I have no idea. Am I going to have to google her? She has a nice body, I just don’t care to see all of it.

    Kat looks pretty.

  8. Nanz01 says:

    At first glance (at just the front if the dress), I thought she looked amazing. But then I saw her backside, and I just don’t need to see a$$cheek this early in the morning, you know? So yeah, way too revealing. For some reason, I think sheer in just the front would have been fine. Revealing, but fine. As it is, there’s really no need to bother with a dress at all.

  9. lucy says:

    Well, it leaves nothing to the imagination, and she looks uncomfortable and a little embarrassed.

    But it got her some press, where I’m sure nobody knew her name yesterday, so well done….?

  10. Andrea2 says:

    Trashy!!!!

  11. MonicaQ says:

    Is she Sif? Because I kinda draw a blank when I look at her.

    • Maureen says:

      “I kinda draw a blank when I look at her.”

      Me too, totally. And maybe that’s why she feels so desperate that she has to wear an absurd try-hard dress like this: because she registers as a total zero even though she’s a co-star in a huge blockbuster movie — twice.

    • sputnik says:

      yeah, she plays sif in the thor movies.

      • Meredith says:

        Sif is a great character in Thor. She is a warrior and I think in Thor I, she was one of the few women to achieve that status – i.e. who was able to prove that she had the skills and ferocious nature to be a warrior. So I’m not sure how this dress fits into the kick ass character of Sif!

  12. Diana says:

    Body and face are stunning for Jaimie!!! I would have preferred the back not be so revealing though… I think the vaginal mesh is too much skin for my taste too.

  13. browniecakes says:

    All that for Carlisle Cullen?

  14. Another Ann says:

    Why even bother with the dress? Just go naked and be done with it.

    • GoodNamesAllTaken says:

      That’s exactly what I was thinking. Let’s just all go to premieres naked except for big red arrows pointing at our breasts, vaginas and buttocks. Why pretend this is about fashion?

  15. Angel May says:

    Her body is flawless, but this dress makes her look thirsty AF.

  16. Amory says:

    To me, it is a beautiful, architectural dress, but it belongs in a magazine spread, not on a red carpet. For the latter, it could use more cover, especially in the back.

  17. RN says:

    She could wear it to her next OB/GYN appointment and never have to disrobe for the doctor’s examination.

    • Maureen says:

      + 1

    • Tig says:

      You made me spit out my coffee!! Priceless! It just seems like everyone who wears a “dress” like this to some big event is trying to replicate what JLo did all those years ago in that Versace- and that frock was tame by comparison.

  18. Rose says:

    Eh I like it

  19. tracking says:

    ewww.

  20. aquarius64 says:

    Too much showing; and it makes her look like a desperate attention seeker. Jaimie’s gorgeous; she didn’t have to go there. Natalie kept it classy on the Thor 2 red carpets. (Why is she not at this one?)

  21. Elle says:

    This is a dress that would only work at the grammys.

  22. elsa says:

    I actually like the dress and the whole look very much! It is rather revealing but I believe she does pull it off. What can i say? I ‘m a european.

  23. jinni says:

    She has such lovely eyes. I love the shape of them and the color is a great contrast with her dark hair. As for the dress, if the cut out had only been in the front than it would’ve been okay to me, but the added exposure in the back is just too much for my taste. But she seems confident and comfortable in it and that’s what really matters.

  24. YummyMummy says:

    Trashy or sexy? Is that even a question? Total trash!! She has a great body and could wear a sexy dress and look great. This is a cheap tacky mess!

  25. GIRLFACE says:

    Ew. Trash. The cut outs need to stop. Please. Designers. Quit it with the awkward cutouts. She looks like Paula Abdul circa 1990 in the worst way. Yuck. I think Kat’s gown is a problematic length but I like the print too.

  26. eliza says:

    Why bother with clothes if you are going to wear that?! Seriously, I am far from a prude and love a sexy dress, but this is Jenna Jameson AVN Awards worthy not movie red carpet material.

    Who is she?

  27. yeahright says:

    Good grief that’s disgusting. She’s absolutely stunning AND she is the type to be able to pull off a dress that shows more skin… but not like THAT. It looks budget and her hair looks like it belongs at a barn wedding.

  28. Bird says:

    Such a desperate attention grab. So trashy!

  29. PHD gossip says:

    For attention seeking starlet behavior lets compare it to Elizabeth Hurley’s 1994 Versace Gown that was very revealing and got Liz a lot of attention. This just attracts negative attention. This is as big a fail as KK’s “couch gown” for the Met Gala.
    Yes, folks, this gown is THAT tasteless!

  30. Sunny says:

    terrible, but still better than every Marchesa dress i´ve ever seen

  31. Crack Fox says:

    I love the dress, it’s very sexy. I think she wears it well, preventing it from look uber trashy despite her vageen showing.

  32. Agnes says:

    I like Kat’s dress. Most of the time she seems dominated by her breasts but this time she looked cute

  33. Julianna says:

    IDGAF she looks sexy as hell.

  34. Side-Eye says:

    I think Jaimie’s dress is really nice except for the back, and she’s extremely pretty, but Kat Dennings bores me to tears.

  35. FW says:

    I Like Jaimie. She’s Sif in both Thor movies. But this dress…errrrrrrrrrr…sexy in a wrong way

  36. Grant says:

    I can’t hate because she’s such a badass in the Thor movies (especially the one coming out Friday)…

  37. Kelly says:

    Attention seeking, sure, but she pulls it off. She’s stunningly beautiful. Flaunt what you’ve got.

    On another note, this post reminds how these two women seemed so smitten with Hiddleston during their press rounds for the first Thor movie, now they’re all barely speaking, what happened?

  38. strah says:

    This is a “dress” not a dress.
    Just be naked if that’s what you want to do. The sheer window dressing seems more silly than sexy.

  39. Reece says:

    Kaiser, a “movie star” is someone recognized by face and/or name. This person qualifies as neither. Seriously I had to google her to realize she’s the girl god in the movie.

    As for the dress: From the front = whatever…From the side WTF?! I don’t wanna see that!

  40. OriginallyBlue says:

    She’s gorgeous and her body is sick. I could do without seeing her butt cheek and part of her crotch, though. If it covered her butt and crotch a bit more, I would like it even more, but I still think she looks sexy.

  41. Janeite says:

    Her hair and makeup are great and she’s a gorgeous woman but there is just no excuse for that dress. It’s utterly obnoxious. I wanted to like Kat Dennings’ dress but there was just something kind of off about it; it looked like it didn’t quite fit properly.

  42. DreamyK says:

    Thanks for shaving ladyland before foisting that dress upon us, Jaimie. Yikes.

    • GIRLFACE says:

      It looks like her wax person knew to follow up with exfoliation as well. I wonder what happened if she sat down, do you think her south lips smiled and clapped along? Do you think they chatted up the guy sitting next to her?

  43. nicegirl says:

    I am not a fan of the dress – it leaves nothing to the imagination.

  44. Marianne says:

    Its not leaving much to the imagination. Thats for sure.

  45. Megan says:

    Lol I think she looks smoking hot. Is it over the top? Yea but at least it shook up the red carpet. Natalie’s fashion always bores me and Kat looks like a troll who got tangled in an oriental rug (sorry fangirls) so this is an interesting change for once lol.

    I always liked Jaimie since Kyle XY, she is gorgeous and seems like a sweet girl.

  46. Andrea says:

    This dress reminds me of Gloria Steinem’s famous quote: “I wish we didn’t have to be nude to be noticed.”

    She wanted attention and she got it but there a price. Exploitation . Yes, being in charge of our own bodies is empowering but there is also the reality that women in Hollywood are frequently exploited and judged as sex objects. She’s not fighting that here. She’s giving in to it.

    Not into her.

  47. Sisi says:

    So trashy and that dress is kind of bland. What a horrid look, yikes.

  48. Denise says:

    Is that a serious question? Also, when are people going to learn that the outside of a woman’s pubic area is not the vagina? Last I checked that was on the inside. The dress is bad but I’m pretty sure I wouldn’t be able to see her cervix with a flashlight.

  49. Miss M says:

    Oh Jaimie.. the name of your movie is Thor not p*rn.

    Such a pretty woman, such a trashy dress…

  50. Singtress says:

    We know her name today.
    Dress for success.

    If she is smart (who knows) her dress choice was all about becoming a hot topic on here, CNN, People, US…and all the other places I have seen her today.

    That said… there are a lot of clothes out there that I would wear if I had a killer body like that.
    This is not one of them.

    • Singtress says:

      And I can’t help but imagine the double-sided tape placement.

    • Anna says:

      Rumour has it(actually the term “rumour is wrong”…she basically revealed it)that she is Wonder Woman so i think she does not need the dress.IDK Jaimie always striked be as someone very cool and edgy.I thinks that’s her edge here not her famewhoring as people claim,

      • lc says:

        Oh, hell no! I hope they reconsider their casting choice. WW is a role model and should not be played by someone who parades her crotch and ass on the red carpet for every horny old producer’s consideration.

  51. Naomi says:

    Lets remember that Jaime Alexander is a homewrecker. On top of that her boyfriend had a sixteen-year old daughter. Clearly she doesn’t care what image she projects as long as it gets HER attention. Her her, it’s all about her.

    • Willow says:

      According to the GFY girls, she took one of the daughters with her to the premier. I’m sure that will go over well with JGarth. Wonderful example you’re setting for teenage females, Jaime.

  52. Dommy Dearest says:

    Pretty sure Miley has worn even less than this. Oh damnit. Miley has screwed over my shock meter. I’m not even bothered by this.

  53. Bread and Circuses says:

    Jaimie Alexander is one of my unreserved girl-crushes. She is SO pretty.

    But yeah. That dress is very “LOOKIT! LOOKIT! I’M SOOOO NAKED! WHEE!”

  54. Bird says:

    I’d already forgotten her name by the time I read all the comments.

  55. kibbles says:

    The only thing I envy is Kat Denning’s gorgeous skin. She has the kind of voluptuous body I find attractive, but she as well as Christina Hendricks need to hire a stylist who knows how to dress women with big boobs and butt.

    Never heard of Jaimie Alexander so I guess she got the attention she wanted from this dress. I really hate where celebrity culture is headed. These people really have no bounds. The men in the industry obviously encourage and reward these women for their sex and nudity. Celebrity women confuse their monetary rewards and attention for sexual freedom and empowerment.

    They’ve sold their bodies and souls and could care less the ramifications their actions have on the majority of girls and women who aren’t fortunate enough to be highly rewarded when they are victimized and exploited for their body parts.

    Hope this woman fades away like all the ones before her who were the “IT” girl of the moment for being hot, but didn’t have the talent to back up the goods.

  56. Vera says:

    Ugh. Straight up nasty, but I never heard of her before today, so mission accomplished, I suppose.

  57. chloe says:

    Well she has a great body and a very good waxer. As for her I forgot her name before I finished reading all of these posts, wearing a dress like that so early in your career is pretty much showing all directors and producers out there what roles your qualified for, which are any that might have gone to Megan Fox , I hear Michael Bay calling her right now.

  58. M.A.F. says:

    The only thing I wished she would have done is keep the weight on. She is way skinner than a year or too ago. She looked way better at the Thor 1 premiere because she had some weight.

  59. Nicole says:

    I so would.

  60. Erm says:

    It is interesting from the front, but the back just makes it look comical and silly. Like a giant censor bar across the butt crack.

  61. I Choose Me says:

    I saw the pic that shows that she’s completely bare under there. Terrific body but I gotta ask did she really need to go there for attention? Then again we’re all here commenting on it so, mission accomplished?

    • Miss M says:

      “Terrific body but I gotta ask did she really need to go there for attention?”

      Yes, she needed it. Who would pay attention to her, someone who barely shows up in the movie, if we saw CHems and TommyannE in a red carpet together? Obviously she wanted to make a SPLASH on the LA premiere because everybody in the industry will know who she is now…

  62. spiderjoe23@gmail.com says:

    I wonder how she feels about that dress today?

  63. Karen81 says:

    Freely concede I am jealous of her butt, you could bounce quarters off that thing. But the dress is shankeous.

    And for those who won’t know, that is who Jennie Garth’s husband, Peter left her for.

    • aquarius64 says:

      I bet Jaimie’s publicist doesn’t what THAT piece of information getting out much. It won’t do if your client is tagged a homewrecker.

  64. Lark says:

    The big rumor is that Jaimie landed the Wonder Woman role and has a supporting part (or one where she is introduced) in the new Batman/Superman film. A couple of the film people have been heavily hinting that the role has been cast for a while now and insinuating it was her. I already disliked the “sheer” trend with visible underwear that everyone was doing last year, so I don’t care for this at all.

  65. aquarius64 says:

    Take a look of this YouTube clip:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rLomqdqilYM

    This does not look like a woman who’s confident about her choice of dress in my opinion. She looks like she’s praying the photogs don’t get an OB/GYN view of her and the next day’s headlines are “Thor 2 actress shows her ladybits on the red carpet”.

  66. Stace says:

    She looks good in Thor but I don’t see her as Wonder Woman.

  67. Nanner says:

    Her mother must be SO proud! LOL

  68. skankey says:

    Magical, absolutely erotic, the peek a boo is so hot its untrue.
    All you people slagging her off, reeks of desperation to me.
    Just think about any beach in summer, you see boobs, half boobs, side boobs, loads cleavage.
    You see buttocks with just small piece of string. Where ladies used to have bikinis hipster style, they started to cut them higher, with the net effect of what used to cover all of the pudendum and pubic hair, now only covers the centre part, so all the sides of the private area has to be trimmed.
    This used to be considered all of the vagina, so we see a part of that either side seems to have gone unnoticed and gone main stream. no one bats an eye about this, but when a celeb wears something risqué the world stops, so I say to you all, get a life, retract the claws.
    We are only young and beautiful for a short time, flaunt it as long as you can.
    miaoww