Jennifer Aniston turned down Playboy offer

fp_1742904_aniston_jennifer
After her famous nude GQ shoot, Hefner was impressed by the photos, and has now offered Jennifer Aniston another chance to get naked. But Aniston has decided that one nude magazine spread is enough, turning down a record-breaking possible $10 million dollar deal.

Jennifer Aniston has snubbed a record-breaking $4 million offer–including a percentage deal that could have brought the price to $10 million–to recreate her nude January 2009 GQ cover photo for men’s mag giant Playboy.

Playboy approached the former Friends star after the recent photoshoot, in which she posed in her birthday suit except for an appropriately placed necktie.

According to The National Enquirer, although very pleased that her nearly 40-year-old frame can still turn heads, Jennifer politely declined Playboy’s offer, reportedly telling magazine boss Hugh Hefner that GQ was art, but Playboy is SEX.

[from PopCrunch]

Well, the publicity stunt worked. She’s now got Hugh Hefner knocking on her door. If this report is true, it’s not surprising that Jennifer turned them down. It’s not as if she’s hard-up for cash, and with her John Mayer romance and subsequent breakup, she’s receiving plenty of press.

If she had said yes, this probably would have been a high-selling cover. With Playboy’s financial troubles due to the recession, Hef is willing to hire anyone who will sell covers and create publicity. And as we saw from the GQ cover, Jennifer can sell magazines.

Jennifer Aniston is shown outside the Late Show on 12/17/08. Credit: RAM/Fame Pictures

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

16 Responses to “Jennifer Aniston turned down Playboy offer”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Keekee says:

    Maybe Hugh found out JA is single again and is making his move?

  2. MSat says:

    I’d do it if I were her. Heck, I’d do it even if I wasn’t her. $10 mil for lying around naked for a few hours? Sign me up.

  3. Christina says:

    why would she do playboy? that’s kind of insulting…

  4. elainebenes says:

    MSat :)

  5. vdantev says:

    Bright lights are not her friend, she looks like turtle taking a large dump.

  6. so what says:

    Good for her,nice to see money can’t buy everyone..vdantev???shouldn’t you be over on JJ??? that comment is really stupid, are you 12?

  7. boomchakaboom says:

    Thank you Jennifer, for sparing us.

    By the way, CB, a naked any woman will turn heads.

    vdantev: I agree. Bright lights are not this woman’s friend.

  8. Mr. T says:

    Media whoring at work.

  9. NotBlonde says:

    Bright lights aren’t anyone’s friend.

    And no durr she said no. She’s not some D-list celebrity scrounging around for cash.

  10. Jenny is one of the most beautiful women inside out i have ever met in my entire life…i love her till death

  11. Trillion says:

    whoaaaaaaa…

  12. Cha Cha says:

    Dante, that is one of the funniest things I have read on this site. I would have never thought of it that way, but you kind of have a point there.

  13. vdantev says:

    shouldn’t you be over on JJ??? that comment is really stupid, are you 12?

    Why; was it too highbrow for you ?

  14. anonymous says:

    The GQ was art ? Give me a break ! there was a group s*x, orgy related
    type of picture scene with her and two young naked men

    It was worst than Playboy ! Worst than Carmen Electra spreadsheet in that men’ magazine.

    It was straight up p*rn !

    She is the ultimate aging slut ! More than Pamela Anderson and Shauna Sands reunited !

  15. Heren says:

    She is receiving the kind of attention that she deserves.
    The funny thing is that her body is not hot at all, her legs are manly looking, she doesn’t have boobs, her butt is flat.
    And the face, well, better not talk about it.

  16. Astori says:

    She is not bad,but she is a little bit fet