Charlie Hunnam on never getting an Emmy nom: ‘I really don’t give a sh-t’

wenn21548565

I don’t watch Sons of Anarchy but I’ve heard good things about it. The subject matter is interesting, but I could easily see how “respectable” (old) Emmy voters would think that bikers and such would be too “downmarket” for their prestigious television awards show. Those are the same Emmy voters that keep nominating Downton Abbey (which I watch and enjoy, but I’m realistic about the diminished quality). Downton is “classy” – SoA is not. So, obviously, Sons of Anarchy has only been nominated for ONE Emmy the entire time it’s been on the air. The one Emmy nomination was for “Outstanding Original Main Title Theme Music.” Seriously. Charlie Hunnam has never been nominated, no Katey Sagal, no Ron Perlman, etc. No writing nominations, no directing nominations, nothing. So, obviously, that notable lack was mentioned during the FX panel discussion at the TCA press tour:

FX’s Sons of Anarchy made it nearly all the way through its final panel at the Television Critics Association’s summer press tour before the show’s perennial Emmys snub came up. And when it did, the stars and creators had a good laugh at the TV Academy’s expense. In its seven-season run, the Kurt Sutter drama has never received any Emmy acting attention, including in the best drama race; the outspoken showrunner has been vocal about the series deserving a nomination.

Speaking to reporters Monday afternoon, star Charlie Hunnam expressed how he really feels about the show’s perennial snubs. “Lest we forget, it doesn’t matter at all. I feel there’s this perception that we’re upset about this and.… I really don’t give a sh-t,” he said to laughs from his co-stars and producers. “I make this for the people that watch the show and I really care for me about the work that I do and for my friends that watch it. People don’t appreciate it. You can’t win them all.”

Director Paris Barclay, who is a two-time Emmy winner (NYPD Blue) and a nominee this year for his work on Fox’s Glee, said Sons isn’t the kind of show where new viewers can come in and find it — or one that “appeals to Emmy voters.” “I’m not a biker dude, I’m a Glee dude, but you get sucked into it,” he said.

Sutter, meanwhile, largely refrained from lashing out at the TV Academy as he has done in the past and joked that the Sons snubs were because his characters aren’t wearing costumes on the show. But after hearing both Hunnam and Barclay weigh in, the outspoken showrunner concluded the conversation on a light note.

“I want an Emmy. I’ll be honest. I would like an Emmy,” he said with a smile, before adding that he was so disconnected after seeing Sons ignored again this year that he neglected to congratulate Barclay on his nomination. “I didn’t know Paris was nominated for Glee until four days later,” he said with a laugh. “I didn’t even acknowledge it because I was like, ‘F— that!’ “

[From THR]

I think it would be nice to see Charlie and Kurt Sutter acknowledge that it could totally be a lot worse – SoA could have died on the vine years ago, but they have a loyal fanbase and they have a network (FX) that supports them, year after year. I’m still mourning the loss of Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip and Life (with Damian Lewis, and GOD THAT SHOW WAS AWESOME). So, yeah, SoA got support in all of the important ways and they got eight seasons and they got to tell the story they wanted to tell. But let’s also be honest – all of these people would love to be recognized with an Emmy nomination. Even Charlie.

wenn21567269

Photos courtesy of WENN.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

46 Responses to “Charlie Hunnam on never getting an Emmy nom: ‘I really don’t give a sh-t’”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Nya says:

    lol why would get an Emmy nom? There are like 9 other people on the show who would deserve one more than him. But Kurt Sutter is a disgusting whiny baby so I’m happy when SOA never gets any big nominations, just to see him break down and write angry letters.

  2. GiGi says:

    Kurt Sutter is a genius. I was a reluctant SOA viewer – even though I come from bikers, so the topic is familiar. But this show – it does just suck you in. Charlie Hunnam may be the star of the show, but he’s the weakest link – not that he’s bad necessarily, but the other actors on the series are so, so good. They definitely deserve more recognition. I feel like if they were on HBO instead of FX, they’d get it.

    • Lucy2 says:

      FX is largely ignored, except in the miniseries categories where there’s usually less competition. It’s a shame because they have some very good shows.

      • Molly says:

        agreed. I love Tyrant and the Bridge. Their shows are more edgy and have excellent storylines so I hope SOA gets nominated in its last season now that Breaking Bad and boring old Mad Men are done.

      • lucy2 says:

        I really love Justified, and the Americans is very good as well. Both are often ignored.
        I’m glad that Louie gets recognition, but Archer just got nominated after 4 years, and It’s Always Sunny gets ignored all the time. It would have been great if they’d gotten some nomination for their “Emmy” episode.
        I couldn’t get into the Bridge – I may have to try again when I can binge watch a season or 2, I was just too distracted when I tried to watch it. And I haven’t tried Tyrant yet at all.

    • MsGoblin says:

      LOVE me some Tig!

      • Jeanette says:

        Some Tig…Some Jax..Some Chibs.. I just couldnt pick one. :

        They got 7 seasons. Sutter says this one will be the last and it is 7.

      • JM says:

        Hoping for Tig & Venus this season!!

  3. Lindy79 says:

    I’m so with you on the Downton getting nominated over other things. It’s enjoyable and I watch it but no way is it worthy of nominations other than costume/set design.
    Sons isn’t the only one that gets overlooked, you can almost predict the regular noms to most of the tv award shows and a lot (not all) don’t deserve the repeated noms year after year, even on years when the quality has slipped, which happens on all shows.

    I also hate the “lets give them to this show because it’s ending (I’m not talking about Breaking Bad before anyone loses their shit) but it basically means you can predict the winners and you’re only giving it to them because the show is over and you didn’t bother to give it to them before that. Like giving Scorcese the oscar for not his best work, it’s like a pity f*ck.

    *ducks*

    • Sixer says:

      I think it’s funny!

      To Americans, it’s about posh people so it’s classy and they love being fascinated by British poshies. Witness the six trillion Emmy and Golden Globe nominations and wins.

      To the Brits, it’s a downmarket, albeit populist, soap opera about poshies and as such, it’s barely been noticed by the main BAFTA awards and has only one lowly technical win.

      BAFTA likes giving awards to gritty shows about non-posh people. I bet if Sons of Anarchy was a British show, it would have won loads.

      You couldn’t get two more diametrically opposed ways of looking at from the two organisations!

    • jammypants says:

      It’s a horrible show. Pretty to look at but nothing more.

  4. Enny says:

    Who needs an Emmy with an ass like that?

  5. Kate says:

    I don’t know, it’s a bit like True Blood for me. I watch and mostly enjoy it, but I don’t actually think it’s very good. It has it’s moments, sure, but it’s really just a bit of a mess. It’s certainly not in the same league as Breaking Bad, Mad Men, Boardwalk Empire etc. and I can’t really think of any shows I would have liked to see lose a nomination in favour of SoA. Downton I guess, but I’d say they’re about the same quality really so I don’t think either should be getting nominations.

    Katey Sagal deserved a nomination or two though.

    • Lucy2 says:

      That’s pretty much how I feel too. Katey should have been recognized back in the beginning, and WG for Venus, but other than that it’s never one I feel was robbed. It isn’t a bad show, but there are better shows out there.

    • Lori says:

      yup. I agree %100.

    • Irishae says:

      Yep, it’s exactly like True Blood for me and has been since the second season. I remember Katey Sagal got a Golden Globe early on, but the show has been otherwise MIA in award categories and I don’t necessarily disagree.

  6. Elizabeth says:

    Life was a great show & I loved Damian Lewis in it. I would have loved to see where that show would have gone. Sigh.

  7. Easi says:

    I watch it and think it isn’t that great. It’s actually pretty bad sometimes. Justified is way better. That show deserved more love.

  8. Newsgirl628 says:

    I’m boycotting this year’s Emmy broadcast. How do you overlook, “Orphan Black” and Tatiana Maslany’s phenomenal performance? The voters keep nominating the same shows and actors. Like Lainey said, they don’t even bother watching the dvd’s, they just search for familiar names.

    • M.A.F. says:

      I’m “boycotting” for the simple fact the show is on a Monday this year instead of a Sunday.

  9. eliza says:

    For me, the really good and interesting shows or actors never get nominated. Melissa McBride has been phenomenal in The Walking Dead and her performance in the episode “The Grove” should definitely have at least gotten a nod for supporting actress. I also felt Scott Wilson deserved a nod for his turn as Herschel BUT because it is a “zombie show” no one takes notice of the real acting from some of the actors.

    Awards shows mean zippo when you think about it. There are tons of really good films, tv shows, music etc that are never recognized but are far superior to those that do, they just fail to have the “machine” of money behind them to promote them to voters.

    • Kori says:

      I’m still mad over the McBride snub. She was phenomenal in that episode.

      • eliza says:

        I thought for sure McBride would be nominated this year. Sadly it is because it is not the genre people feel deserves awards, she was overlooked.

    • Lindy79 says:

      Agreed on both. Hershel all but carried the entire episode before the Governors attack, and it was some powerful acting.

      • eliza says:

        Scott Wilson was awesome in every episode he was in. I LOVED Herschel and Wilson’s portrayal of him always brought out some emotion in me. I teared up his final episode and you are right, that episode was wonderful because of him.

  10. Diana says:

    The Emmys are a total joke, though. Doesn’t the industry kind of know that? It’s like “my favorite shows according to my 85 year old grandad.”

    I feel like this happens every year, though. The Emmys play it safe and ratings are okay but never truly great and everyone complains how out of date it all is/how they want to boycott the show and yet everything continues exactly the same, year after year.

  11. bettyrose says:

    But he said it in a gruffy, manly voice with the hint of an English accent.

  12. FingerBinger says:

    The Emmys are a popularity contest. Whatever shows get talked or written about the most get nominated. People are talking/writing about Downton Abbey,Breaking Bad, House of Cards and Mad Men. No one is really talking about shows like Orphan Black or Sons of Anarchy. That’s why they don’t get nominated.

  13. mia girl says:

    “I’m still mourning the loss of Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip”

    @Kaiser – Just when I thought I had found my peace, you punch me in the gut with the reminder of what could have been. Damn you NBC, damn you to h*ll!!

    • Nedsdag says:

      I always thought what hurt Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip was the success of 30 Rock. I know that one show was a dramedy and the other a 30 minute sitcom, but Tina Fey was a part of an actual late night comedy show and NBC gave it more of a push.

    • j.eyre says:

      I loved Studio 60. I not only mourn the loss of the show but I mourn the loss of its soul when they rushed to wrap it up after cancellation and wrote that horrible dreck for the final episode. You could almost hear the crack in Mr. Perry and Mr. Whitford’s voices as they read their generic “happy ending” lines.

      I think I broke up with TV that night.

  14. alex_r says:

    Finally someone who loves Life like me. That show was special – especially the first season. Damian Lewis and Sarah Shahi was perfect together – my second favorite partner pairing since Mulder/Scully. And the soundtrack – I still listen to it.

  15. Meandyou says:

    Every time I think of the snubs my favorite shows get from the Emmys/GG and the likes I remind myself that The Wire, largely held by TV critics as the best show ever, was never nominated for anything. And on shows that were cancelled too soon, 8 years later and I still mourn the loss of Deadwood and keep hoping against hope that Milch & Co will get around to give that show a proper ending. Damn you HBO c*cksuckers!

    As for SoA, I have watched 6 seasons and the show does suck you in. I don’t think its excellent but it is a very good show nonetheless. Agree that Katey Sagal deserves 1 or 10 nominations. So does her husband.

    • eliza says:

      DEADWOOD! *cries*. I MISS THAT SHOW! Ian McShane should have been a nominee every year that show was on.

      In my opinion, it was one of HBO’s best shows. I curse Milch for abandoning it in favor of that other idiotic show of his that failed, John in Cincinnati.

  16. Vizia says:

    +1000 on Life.

    Fruit. Need more fruit.

  17. wow says:

    …which really means he DOES give a sh*t.

  18. Nicolette says:

    *sigh* That smile………yummy.

  19. Hayley says:

    Seriously, the Emmys are such a crock and have been for years. I hope Charlie truly doesn’t give a shit and has recognized how ridiculous the Emmys are. They need to be renamed “The Old People’s Choice Awards”.

    And since everyone’s listing their biggest Emmy snubs, here’s mine: Hannibal. All of Hannibal. Writing, directing, visuals, any of these could have gotten nominations but didn’t. But the real egregious oversight is the acting categories, especially for Mads Mikkelsen who’s giving a master class on subtle menace each week. The rest of the cast is great, too, and hell even the guest stars (Gillian Anderson, Gina Torres) are fantastic. Everybody on that show seems to do the best acting of their lives on this show when they’re in a scene with Mads. Seriously, if you’re not averse to some gore, you should be watching it. It took about 3 episodes to really suck me in but now I’m a goner.

  20. elle says:

    Katey sagal won a golden globe for her role on soa. I guess thats something. Ughh, i just wish chibs would get nominated fir an emmy. Katey too. Venus for her guest appearance.