Natalia Vodianova covers the Vanity Fair ‘Style Issue’: scandalous or boring?

NV3_Blurred

I’m not sure if anyone really cares about Natalia Vodianova at a gossip-level. Which is weird, because she’s somewhat scandalous. Natalia is one of the top models in the world, or at least she was before she started having lots of babies with two different, wealthy men and now she’s famous for being beautiful and rich. She covers the September issue of Vanity Fair, The Style Issue, and she gave the magazine a lengthy interview about her life and loves. It’s hard to believe she’s only 32 years old, honestly. She’s two years younger than Gisele Bundchen.

Anyway, the story of Natalia is that she was born in the last throes of the then-USSR. Her family was very poor, her mother struggled enormously and Natalia set out on her own at 15/16. She was discovered at 17 and by the age of 18-19, she was a major model. She was once married to one of the wealthiest aristocrats in England, Justin Portman, and they have three kids together. They split in 2010 and now she’s with Antoine Arnault, who is part owner of the enormous fashion company LVMH. She’s having his babies too (she gave birth in May). To her credit, no one says she’s a grifter or a diva. She’s just a beautiful woman who attracts powerful, wealthy men. Anyway, you can read the full VF interview/article here. I found it interesting but I didn’t like how VF pulled away from really examining the idea that there was some overlap between her marriage and her current relationship with Arnault.

Being scouted as a model: “I was excited, but I was also afraid no one would pick me if I went. So I pretended I didn’t care. It’s a very Russian way of protecting yourself. You turn up your nose and you hold your head high and you have this proud air. I was a very different girl back then. I was kind of tough and easily sparked into an argument. I was very defensive.”

The first time she ever traveled to Paris: “The plane ride to Paris was absolutely incredible. It was Air France and my first taste of a different language and a different culture. Everyone was so smiley and polite—and the food! Lovely vegetables in a creamy sauce with pasta. You got a little starter, then the main course, and then a little Camembert, a little dessert, a chocolate, and a piece of bread and butter.”

Her split with Justin Portman: “If you try really hard at something and it doesn’t work, then you have to let go because it means it is not the right thing,” she explained very softly. “You have to try really hard to make it work, but at the same time you have to know how to let go of something when it is time.” Now the kids live with Natalia and Arnault in Paris and spend half of their vacations with their father.

Getting together with Antoine Arnault: “He made himself noticed. Men are good at that.” Their first date was in front of the building where they now live. She explains, “We couldn’t go anywhere together, so we just met on a bench and sat and talked. We knew if we go somewhere, in Paris, then the whole world would know.”

Moving fast: “When I moved [to be with Arnault] in Paris, the year before last I moved with my children, and my grannie, who stayed for eight months. That tells you a lot about Antoine as a future husband, or as a father or as a partner in life. He’s one of the most patient people. It’s not like we have a big house. We’re all in an apartment together. He gets up at eight A.M. and goes to work with a big smile on his face. He loves what he does, loves my children so much, is a great father and stepfather and boyfriend. I guess he is still a boyfriend. I want to call him my husband because it feels right, whether we have the papers or not. He feels like a husband already, although it doesn’t make a difference, does it? I feel blessed. He is everything I love and respect.”

[From Vanity Fair]

There’s an emphasis several times on how Natalie only got with Antoine well after her marriage was over. Maybe that’s the case. I don’t know. But I do know that many people in the fashion world were shocked when her first marriage ended and many still feel like there’s much more to the story. Russian drama or English drama? Who knows? Anyway, I do like Natalia. She’s a great model.

NV1

NV2

Photos courtesy of Vanity Fair.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

148 Responses to “Natalia Vodianova covers the Vanity Fair ‘Style Issue’: scandalous or boring?”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Abbott says:

    She kind of looks like Yawna Del Ray here.

  2. Val says:

    She really is a great model, and she is quite nice. I saw her a couple of times and she is TINY though (in size, not height) and definitely doesn’t look her age.

    • T.C. says:

      +1

      She looks beautiful and like an adult instead of the teenybopper looking Cara D and her crew.

  3. ncboudicca says:

    All I can see is dead animal on the cover.

    • only1shmoo says:

      Thank you, I didn’t want to be the first to point that out, but honestly, I find fur in particular to absolutely repulsive!

    • frisbeejada says:

      Yup, beautiful (if dead) animal on an ugly human being…

    • jenny12 says:

      I’m with you.

    • Ordinary says:

      +1 I agree with you 100% on the fur being repulsive.

    • Truthtful says:

      Thanks! It’s all I can see too!

    • CharlotteS says:

      It’s horrible and I think less of her for wearing it.

    • break says:

      Definitely. Really upsetting.

    • BOXES full of Pepe says:

      Yep, as soon as I saw the fur I thought “Disgusting”. “Oh, is there a nipple?” “Is her personal life supposed to be scandalous?” Don’t care at all about the latter two. Just that hideous fur, which is still supposed to symbolize style and luxury in the year 2014.

    • TheOriginalKitten says:

      Fur coats are so damn ugly. I wish the fashion industry would stop glamourizing something that is so inhumane, not to mention repulsive.

    • lisa says:

      yes it looks so dated and gross, i would never buy it just for that

    • Suzy says:

      It is GROSS. Just like people dont want to know how their food gets to their table, those that wear fur choose to be ignorant about how the fur products are brought to market. It’s disgusting and the ultimate of vanity, killing something for no reason other than to make yourself look better. SICK!

    • Isadora says:

      Can’t agree more! It’s not only the killing itself that upsets me so much, but the way fur animals are raised and treated. It’s the worst thing I’ve ever seen.

  4. Ordinary says:

    She’s gorgeous but her life (honest to God) sounds so boring. And both of those guys are really unattractive. Sorry to be rude. I’m sure they’re lovely people – on the inside. (Antoine Arnault looks like Timothy Hutton.)

    • Bernice says:

      Boring??? She has 4 children, lives in Paris, travels the world for work, visits her family in Russia and runs a successful charity. How on earth do you get boring from all that???

    • HappyMom says:

      M.A.F.: “Run of the mill” with a Viscount and a billionaire? Clearly you run in higher circles than I do.

      • M.A.F. says:

        It’s run of the mill yes. Her story & the guy situation is nothing new. Only difference is the men might have titles-titles that don’t really mean anything in today’s society.

    • Anne tommy says:

      Don’t diss the lovely Timbo!

  5. Tanguerita says:

    it’s amazing how youthful she looks. She also reminds me of young Elizabeth McGovern.

  6. Green Eyes says:

    As a Vanity Fair subscriber, I received an email last night heralding Natalia’s September cover girl status on VF. I thought it was a joke because I’ve never heard of her before and here this Nobody – albeit, a *pretty* Nobody- on the year’s biggest edition.

    The only way this could make sense is that Pretty Nobody’s husband bought the cover for her.

    • Val says:

      She’s not a nobody… in the fashion world she’s one of the biggest names.

    • hutter says:

      She’s not a “nobody”. Only someone who doesn’t know anything about the modeling world would say that. If they put a brilliant scientist on the cover would you call him or her a “nobody”? She’s a major figure in the field she’s in.

    • Wilma says:

      She definitely isn’t a nobody. But she has been more out of the spotlight for a while now. In her heyday she was one of the biggest names out there. I think she took it easier when she started having kids.

    • Tanguerita says:

      as a “Vanity Fair” subscriber” you should know her, otherwise you are really throwing you money out of the window. Maybe try to subscribe to “House and Garden” instead.

    • PHD gossip says:

      The Point Is obvious – Boyfriend, as a leading advertiser with Vanity Fair – scored her the cover. No discussion.

      • SK says:

        Natalia has been on the covers of plenty of huge mags without him. She’s fronted huge blue chip campaigns including Louis Vuitton’s supermodel campaign with Karen Elson and Christy Turlington (before she was with her current man). I’ve read interviews with major fashion players like Grace Coddington saying that they all try to tempt her to do more shoots and covers but she usually isn’t interested as she’s too into her family. She has her pick of fashion jobs even though she rarely works these days. She is also an interesting subject who rarely gives interviews. I think this is a coup for VF. Your “No discussion” statement is quite rude actually. She made her career for herself; don’t belittle her please.

    • msmercury says:

      She’s been a top model for over 10 years. She may not be a household name in the general public but she is a big name in the fashion world.

      • HH says:

        I’d just like to thank you for your civilized comment. I don’t know why some people can’t respond without insulting. I do know who she is, but I understand why someone wouldn’t. You’d have to be into the modeling/fashion industry to know who she is.

      • GoodNamesAllTaken says:

        Really, HH, I totally agree with you. The sarcastic, belittling comments are so unnecessary. As if someone who doesn’t know the name of every fashion model should just be ashamed to be alive and not allowed to read Vanity Fair. Because that’s SUCH important information and the mark of a truly cultured intellectual.

      • Edminster says:

        @HH

        I agree. I couldn’t make it through all the snotty comments without rolling my eyes.

    • FingerBinger says:

      @ Green Eyes I’ve never heard of her either.

    • Green Eyes says:

      I do know nothing about today’s modeling world. But still, even I know who Gisele is…

    • drea says:

      She was THE “it girl” for a few years. She was errrywhere. You may have a vague memory of her from her Calvin Klein days. If she hadn’t gotten together with Justin Portman in her modeling prime and started having children right away, I think she could’ve become almost as big a name (outside the fashion industry) as Giselle. Although I must say that one of the reasons Giselle is very mainstream/pop culture famous is that she dated Leo and then married Tom.

    • Sisi says:

      I think Natalia and Gisele and possibly Carmen Kass can be considered the last of the true supermodel generation (think Naomi, Cindy, Christy)

    • HappyMom says:

      Really? I heard of her years ago-she was really well known for marrying an aristocrat and having lots of children-pics of her in Vogue all the time. She also had/has some kind of charity where she helps children in Russia-that got a lot of press several years ago.

    • SK says:

      Yeah… She’s one if the biggest supermodels in the world. She has fronted all of the big labels, done the Pirelli Calendar, and they are all begging her to do more but she’s just not that interested. She is definitely not a nobody. If you don’t know who she is then you clearly just don’t pay much attention to fashion. She’s high fashion rather than Victoria’s Secret and she is a very big deal. I’ve wanted to know more about her for ages. Don’t belittle her by saying this was bought for her by a man. She got this on her own merits.

  7. black orchid, says:

    i love her! i find her inspiring!!!

    • Tania2 says:

      In what way is she is inspiring?

      • Pinky Rose says:

        Well, she was a very poor girl from russia (and grew up in a difficult household) that worked her way hard in the modelling world. Then she became a supermodel with great success, and yet she didn’t forget her roots and has founded a charity call Naked Heart Foundation that helps the most empoverished children in her native country. How that is not inspiring?

      • Mel says:

        ” she was a very poor girl from russia (…) worked her way hard in the modelling world. Then she became a supermodel with great success”

        I have absolutely nothing against NV, or anyone successful – quite the opposite -, but this sort of “work” (again, the quote marks are not meant to be belittling) or success is not something that just anyone could replicate, no matter how much “hard work” they put into it, so I don’t see how she can be “inspiring” when it comes to work achievements. She had LUCK, plain and simple: firstly, to be born with the right face and figure for this sort of work, and secondly, to actually get ahead in the business.

        Yes, there are many things a model can do to improve her photogenic impact; but ultimately her success, and the degree of it, depends entirely on other people’s tastes – in other words, on luck (of being the right person in the right place at the right time).

        Again, I do not begrudge her her luck; I just don’t see how achievements that do not depend on effort, dilligence, will power or even resourcefulness can be “inspiring” to others.

  8. GiGi says:

    I remember when she first married Justin – they were such a hot young duo! And then three darling kids? It seemed as though they were very happy… I’m not so sure about the new guy… he could be perfectly nice, but he seems… smarmy.

  9. hutter says:

    She’s NOT famous for being beautiful and rich! She’s one of the major (and best!) models in the world. And she continued to be a sought after model even after having children (she had her first child at 19). She deliberately does less modeling now given that she has four children to look after and a foundation that she’s very dedicated to and involved in.

    • K says:

      So she’s just famous for being beautiful, you mean? Modeling doesn’t exactly require a college degree.

      • Edminster says:

        LOL. I appreciate your common sense.

        This thread has been hugely enlightening–I had no idea I was supposed to be worshiping Natalia V all these years.

    • TheOneandOnlyOnly says:

      Yes, to your comment; one huge problem which everyone on this site and others laments, is that idiotic reality show “stars” have taken the spotlight, among others, and they are always being shoved in our faces – She’s vastly preferable to the lardassians.

  10. Rai-rai says:

    I think Vodianova is sooo pretty, but the cover is boring. Not even scandalous at this point, simply because she has taken her clothes off in quite a few advertisements… Well, as far as I can remember. And it just seems kind of unnecessary. She’s really, really pretty, though. Probably my favourite model, as far as looks go.

  11. GoodNamesAllTaken says:

    How cruel to be out on your own at 15. She sounds very strong.

  12. Talie says:

    Her womb is a grifter! She’s delivered two heirs on her first try to two wealthy men… you better work!

  13. Frida_K says:

    I find it touching that she still remembers the food on the plane to Paris all these years later. In the subsequent years, she’s surely had as much wonderful food as she could want, and yet she still remembers the first trip to Paris so vividly, and the airplane food she was served on the way.

    • Faye says:

      I was going to say the same thing, @Frida_K! I think it’s because she grew up so poor – I remember her talking about having a fruit and vegetable stand in the freezing cold just to make enough money for the family to eat. She was working as a teen. I would imagine when you’ve literally been hungry, having a big, nice meal like that would really stand out in your mind.

      • StormsMama says:

        THIS

      • kri says:

        I read that part about the food on the plane, and it got me. Yes, she is rich, beautiful and set for life now. I get it. But at one time, she was a poor kid alone on a plane who was so excited at having decent food she still talks about it in VF. Whatever else we think of her, this girl used what she had to get where she is. I just wish they had put her in something else for the cover.

    • Ronia says:

      She may have been pooor but she could have started pretending she never was or even come up with a completely new bio – we’ve seen it many times. She could ahve quickly forgotten what a chance she had, she could have erased the past. Instead, she never hid anything, she never pretended and she remianed one of the most down to earth people I have ever met. And she is very big in charity. Only respect to her.

      • Pinky Rose says:

        Exactly. And by all counts she is one of the sweetest people (Disclose: I have actually met her when she came to the MATE opening here in Lima. She is super nice and very witty I may say).

    • Mel says:

      It IS cute – but it may have nothing to do with her social background. I still remember, in vivid detail, the meal I had aboard an Air France flight at age FOUR – and it certainly wasn’t because it were the best or most “posh” meal I had had.
      People usually remember early extra-ordinary experiences, such as being on a plane and the circumstances surrounding the experience. It may have been one of her earliest flying experiences, and that’s why she remembers.
      Or she simply has a good memory. 😉

  14. Truthtful says:

    She is super gorgeous… but is also well known to hunt very wealthy men instead of attracting them…she is a major goldigger, she pursued very actively antoine Arnault who was in a very committed relationship then and dumped her husband almost instantly, and Hélène de fougerolles (Arnault’s then living partner) was super crushed particularly because Natalia was a friend ! It was all over Paris’ news at the time everybody was talking about that!
    But one have to admit that she surely has an outstanding game in landing very rich men… because even if other models are as beautiful they certainly cannot be compared to her in this category!

    • Observer says:

      Ok so I saw pictures of Natalia with this Arnault guy and they have lots of chemistry! You can’t fake that.
      That said, it’s a really shitty thing to do to a friend but I don’t believe you can “steal” someone who doesn’t want to be stolen.

      • Truthtful says:

        I cannot agree more, you cannot steal someone and they have great chemistry… But A-it’s a shitty thing to do to a friend and B- she pursued him- and like super out there- for a while… and it’s kind of not a coincidence that he is even richer that her already mega rich ex-husband… I think she is a very very talented goldigger!

    • Ronia says:

      I beg to differ. Natalia has never been a golddigger simply because she is ten times millionaire herself and she became a millionaire very very early in life because of her big contracts with fashion houses and top brands not catalogues or Victoria’s Secret level stuff. She definitely attracts wealthy men but it’s a small wonder since she is unique in many ways and interesting to them, I suppose but she is also a good partner from what I’ve heard. Arnaud could not be “stolen”. This tale about the bad woman who stole the nice man and he was so innocent but involved in this ugly scenario is making me sick, really. I would think Arnaud wasn’t raped or kidnapped, poor soul.

      • Truthtful says:

        “ten times millionaire herself” yeah right! LOL! LMAO! so can we say then that Mirranda Kerr is a billionaire then.LOL!

        A model is nothing if compared to wealthy people, her whole fortune might represent the annual bills of the transport for her partner family!

        And sure she didn’t steel Arnaud (nobody can be stolen) and who said he was innocent and a nice man?
        BUT the fact that she went behind her friend ‘s(and Arnaud’s then living partner for years) back speaks volumes in term of character and values… not really the good girl you are depicting. Nobody good backstabbed her girlfriends…and decent people don’t even think about it!
        So keep telling your tale, but as gorgeous as she is she is nor wealthy or good!

      • cleo says:

        No she isn’t. Models can only make so much money. @Truthful is correct. Her entire earnings from all her working years are a pittance compared with the Arnault fortune.

  15. Truthtful says:

    Anyone else has noticed how she is pushing quite hard for marriage ?

    • LAK says:

      Yes. Her BF is a Billionaire, so not surprising that she traded UP!!

    • megs283 says:

      well, I think that’s natural when you have a kid with a guy…and you live together…is wanting to be married a bad thing now?

      • Truthtful says:

        No it’s not a bad thing at all, but if you are secure with the idea, and with your partner, you won’t be pushing it throughout a magazine. Plus in France half kids are raised outside marriage …it’s not a big deal to us.The child is entitled to his dad support and inheritance anyway (same rights if born in or outside a marriage)… but she won’t!

    • Talie says:

      Well, he’s French, so she may be waiting awhile. I have no doubt with all his money, it will take years to get a pre-nup together.

      • Truthtful says:

        Yes and we don’t marry easily 😉 or even not all !!!
        Plus the Arnault family doesn’t like her so she better prepare herself to be very patient!

        The Arnault empire is at stake between Antoine and his sister Delphine mainly (even if there are two other siblings) and word is if Antoine marries Natalia, it would be a deal breaker for his father.

        Delphine is now the very favorite because of that (amongst other reasons)

        And for the prenup in France he won’t need it: the only assets that can be shared by a couple are the one they built together during the course of marriage… so all his wealth won’t be at stake at all and protected by this law.

      • Talie says:

        Interesting… yeah, I didn’t think his family was over the moon at the prospect of him hooking up with a divorced woman with 3 kids. I mean, didn’t he have a million opportunities to find someone sans baggage?

      • Val says:

        To be fair though, Truthful, if the Arnaults didn’t like Natalia that much… she wouldn’t be the face of some of their brands (Guerlain for instance). At least, you’d think she’d be pushed out by Bernard.
        I’m guessing she has her own fortune by now too.

      • Truthtful says:

        @Val: the Arnault’s cannot stand her, they don’t even attend the same events (Delphine Arnault do not attend the event where Natalia is)… and she was Guerlain face before being with arnault why not keeping a successful spokesperson (what an odd point)…just like Karl Lagerfeld disliked Audrey tautou but chose her for n°5…business!

        I am sure that 24 millions is close to be filfthy poor for the Arnault’s who are the second richest family in Europe and would have prefer their son to be with his equivalent rather that a model , even if she is stunning.
        Actually you should try european gossips because it’s only what I have stated and just that, it’s not about fairness or what I think it’s about our press and coverage of their couple: apparently the Arnault’s hate her and it is well known in their circle ..his father even downgraded him from communication manager for the whole group to just the Berluti management, a very minor brand of LVMH.

        Again it’s not MY assumptions it’s the whole french press informations, it’s like for all celebrities we talk about here: it’s based on blogs and press informations! Well same here!

      • Pinky Rose says:

        @ Truthful: Yup, what you said it’s true. Except the part that they do not attend events together. They do (they are always seated next to each other at the LVMH fashion shows. Bernard, his second wife Hélene, Delphine, Antoine and now Natalia. Even all the family went to her Naked Heart gala in Monaco). Delphine and Antoine are very close (and it is known fact that Delphine s going to be her father succesor as head of the board, and Antoine seems fine with it. The Berluti gig is an strategy as they want it to be akind to the major LVMH leather goods companies- Vuitton and noe Hérmes, I don’t see it as a downgraded.), so while I think that there is some amiosity by the Arnaults towards Natalia, I think they are downplaying it for Antoine sake. Even when they began to date years ago, their first public appearance as a couple was on a private Art Basel party hosted by Delphine. That doesn’t translate as hate, but you never know.

    • Bernice says:

      She has a child with him AND 3 other children. Makes sense she wants to be married. I imagine she wants to give her children the family and security she did not have as a child.

    • TG says:

      @Truthful – I have not been able to reply on all your comments that I wanted to and this is the only one that has a reply button, so I just wanted to say I love your comments on the gold-digger stuff. I really want to learn French so I can read French gossip. You guys do it the best in the world I think. Maybe it is just because it is Europe and another language but the scandals, and particularly the romantic scandals, are the BEST. That is why I read Vanity Fair becuase of European gossip. Natalia’s life makes for a perfect Vanity Fair article. My favorite article ever was the one a few years ago on Carla Bruni and Sarkozy and all her past loves and scandalous life. There is something so fascinating about these people that live large and have grand passions. In America, I think we have Angelina Jolie who would be worthy of an article. She lives a large and passionate life.

      Also, wanted to say to everyone. I have really enjoyed the gossip today on here. Both articles, the Natalia one and the JKF, JR. one were great and all the comments were so good.

  16. LAK says:

    Amazing how much she’s downplaying the ATM game. She’s in the same category as Elle MacPherson

    • Truthtful says:

      Totally! I know that they both are considered major “gamers” in London!

      • LAK says:

        I would never seat my BF next to these two women even now they are married. They are always looking to trade UP and do it even if you are sitting on the other side!!!

  17. Nev says:

    fabulous model!!!

    love the international best dressed issue!!

  18. Faye says:

    I ain’t sayin she a gold digger . . .

    In all honesty, I find it harder to judge her because she comes from such a poor, deprived background and she did make it on her own as a model before she found these rich guys. It’s easy to judge but when you grew up literally not having enough to eat at times, that probably influences a lot of the decisions you make re making sure you are financially secure.

    • TheOriginalKitten says:

      Yeah I totally agree. I would never marry for money, but I didn’t grow up in poverty.
      It’s all about one’s priorities and that is completely subjective.

      Maybe she’s simply looking for financial and emotional security. So she found a man who is a good father to her children, generous and caring, and a good provider. Maybe they don’t have incredible passion (or maybe they do) but that might not be the most important thing to her.

      It’s not like she doesn’t have her own lucrative career as a model. It’s not like she’s a Russian mail-order bride (and FTR, I don’t fault them either).

  19. Kate2 says:

    I have never heard of her. She’s very pretty though. Seems like a nice person.

  20. megs283 says:

    Ok. Is her leg photoshopped in that last leopard coat picture…? If so, shame on VF!!

  21. Size Does Matter says:

    That woman birthed FOUR babies? Wow, just wow.

    • captain says:

      Yep. Four of them. I honestly suspect she’s an alien. I saw her foto on Instagram just after the birth, naked on a couch breastfeeding the newborn baby. It’s just so unbelievable how girlish she looks, I wasn’t even jelous.

  22. Talie says:

    I just noticed that Cressia Bonas did a photoshoot in this issue too! Wow… has a royal girlfriend every gone the publicity route? I don’t think so. And you know, she was supposed to be so posh and discreet. Ha!

    • LAK says:

      Have you forgotten Kate’s media tour 2007??

      • Talie says:

        That was paparazzi. She never posed for a magazine.

      • LAK says:

        Talie : she did for Hello Magazine.

        Her pap stroll was a concerted effort to show William what he was missing. She deliberately went to pap heavy places, and or called the paps so she would be featured in the next day’s papers.

        You must be the only person in the world who thinks that was accidental.

        People ascribe the same motives to Cressida because they saw that it worked for Kate, but Cressida might just be a famewhore for her own sake, not to bag a prince like Kate.

      • Pinky Rose says:

        And to be fair, at least Cressida went to Vanity Fair and was shoot with all the aristo/posh socialites and the likes. It seems fitting for someone like her, and if she were intending to bag her prince I don’t think this would have been the route to take. Fair is fair.

  23. Liz says:

    Natalia looks like a beautiful, innocent living doll!! What a gorgeous face.

    When the rumors started circulating about a split with Portman, it was insinuated that she was getting tired of being the provider. He used to follow her around to her modeling jobs. This makes me wonder how rich Justin truly is. It seemed his life revolved around hers and she felt suffocated.

  24. eliza says:

    I always laugh when attractive women who land rich men are immediately labeled gold diggers.

    • Truthtful says:

      I agree but when your main career is getting with wealthy men and carrying their children it’s kind of spot on.
      She doesn’t work much except for landing rich men… while she would be able to have a Gisele like career if she would like to !So her actions speak kind of loudly…

      • eliza says:

        She was a busy working model and then married and had kids.

        Maybe, for her, her career is now being a mother to 4 children and perhaps that is enough for her. Just because she was fortunate to meet rich men along the way does not equate a gold digger.

        Rich and powerful men love arm candy a great percentage of time. Why are the women accused of gold digging if the men are the ones who are attracted to them and pursue them.

        It is as if women, particularly beautiful ones, are simply predatory man stealing, gold diggers. I am not sure when a woman who marries a wealthy man is not considered a gold digger?!

      • Truthtful says:

        @Eliza: I would absolutely agree with you if all models were having this life: modeling till marrying rich.

        But it’s far from being the case as all of other models who are also moms and continue to work steadily (claudia Schiffer is still working while in her 40’s and always did while she had 3 kids!)

        “Why are the women accused of gold digging if the men are the ones who are attracted to them and pursue them.”

        Sure. But what is it when it’s the woman who is doing all -the very aggressive- pursuing? and has always the same type of target… Antoine Arnault is surrounded by models and all the most beautiful women in the world, it’s not like Natalia’s beauty came as a shocker in his world you know

        “It is as if women, particularly beautiful ones, are simply predatory man stealing, gold diggers.”

        You are the one making the generalization here you know my comments were solely for Natalia Vodianova.

        Hundreds of other models are perfect examples of being drop dead gorgeous and trying other ways in life than golddigging, Gisele, Isabeli Fontana, Diara werbowzy , etc… A lot of gorgeous women dont jus try to score wealthy men as a main career… with the limitation of targetting just wealthy men , if she had another type of men than just heir to big financial empires and popping them kids out maybe, just maybe the doubt would stand….and if she would be still try to at least work a bit she won’t be suspected of being “interested”…

        I was talking about HER. just her as a well-known goldigger!

        “I am not sure when a woman who marries a wealthy man is not considered a gold digger?!”

        I am sure Bill gate’s and Mark Zuckenberg’s wives aren’t…

        Same for Malgosia Bela ( a model) who married a super rich man too… but fact is she is not branching out from one wealthy man to another, popping them kids out… that’s the big difference with the goldigging type.

        PS: note that you are the one pulling for generalizations.

      • eliza says:

        @Truthful, we will just have to agree to disagree on this matter. 😉

      • Val says:

        Erm… I would refrain using Gisele as an example, as she also went from famous and wealthy (Leo) to famous and wealthy with a pregnant gf.

      • Truthtful says:

        @Val: ok then Daria Werbowy if you would prefer or Freja Beha

        and actually Gisele was already huge in the high fashion world before Léo, and didn’t Tom Brady had left bridget Moynhanan months ago?

        And then again she was already a major name in the industry before being with him and more important she is way richer than him, so actually Gisele is a spot on example!

        But I just see that you want to just state your opinion, that’s ok, but it is not diminishing mine in any point!

      • Ronia says:

        @Truthful

        It looks a bit weird – your determination to make comment after comment all over the place to trash Natalia. You are also wrong – Natalia was very big before she married an aristocrat. Very big. And not like Victoria’s Secret big.

      • Truthtful says:

        @Ronia: I always answer to people who answer me.And I do it on all threads.

        Yeah she was big when she married an aristocrat…She was 19 so she wasn’t big for so long and kind of have shortened her career 13 yrs ago…which in modeling world is like Iron Age.

        And since then she didn’t have that much of career outside marrying rich men and popping out them kids.

      • Mel says:

        @Truthtful: You have a very short memory! Gisele only became famous AFTER DiCaprio, she wasn’t famous not even in her own country before him! and no, she wasn’t “huge” in the fashion world before 1998 neither before she was photographed with DiCaprio at the beach and was giving interviews everywhere to talk about him and landing lots of magazine covers only because of this! And yes, she’s a gold digger since the beginning of her career in Brazil! where she was “dating” older (and wealthy, of course!) men.
        Not to mention that (before and) after DiCaprio, she only dated wealthy business men and famous guys… this is the reason of her fame! If this is not a gold digger, I don’t know how you call this!

      • Truthtful says:

        @Mel: I don’t know about Gisele early career in her country but I do know that the reason of her fame is certainly not dating famous and rich guys (otherwise lots of models would be just as famous) but because she is an incredible model, she is the most ever paid model of all time and she has the most Vogue covers under her belt of all time, beating out by far Kate Moss herself!

        Before Leonardo di Caprio maybe she wasn’t known in the US but in high fashion she was huge; she was already the face of Dolce & Gabbana, Dior and Gucci, she was already on a lot of international vogue covers and ELLE covers, and she walked and opened and closed a lot of high fashion shows .

        She gained more popularity after Leo but in her industry she was already a household name… otherwise all models will have her level of fame and success after having been with di Caprio you know!

        Like her or not but she is a true supermodel and she worked hard for it…otherwise she would have just been popping out kids to very wealthy men.

        The fact that she married someone less rich than her say a lot about her priorities too… because I am sure that if she would have like to go the gold digging route she just would have to pick her choice amongst a huge choice of billionaires since she is one of the only remaining supermodels…

      • Miss D says:

        Mel: You are wrong. She WAS famous in Brazil. She was huge in the fashion world since 1998 – 1999. She was photographed with Leonardo in 2000. You are a liar. You sound so bitter.
        “and was giving interviews everywhere to talk about him and landing lots of magazine covers only because of this.” She NEVER did it.
        “Not to mention that (before and) after DiCaprio, she only dated wealthy business men and famous guys”. She never dated business men.
        Your comment is disgusting. She is not a gold digger.
        Truthtful: Don’t worry, Truthtful. You are not wrong. Mel is wrong and her comment is very sad.

    • thinkaboutit says:

      Sorry but nobody and I mean nobody is gorgeous enough to land back to back billionaires without a whole out of determination and effort. These aren’t just rich men, we’re talking unicorns here.

      • Truthtful says:

        Thanks. You said it way much better than I did!

      • Observer says:

        Even if she did pursue him (aggressively), he still chose her even with all the baggage. So she must have good game for him to choose her with 3 kids already. And honestly, in pictures he looks really into her. But with pics of him and his ex he didn’t look very into her.
        He also continued being with her even after all the bad press so he must be very very in love with her.
        I would love to read french gossip about them though! Love foreign gossip but unfortunately I don’t know french :/
        When you come from poverty it’s easy to see how that might affect your decisions in life so she probably doesn’t want the same childhood she had for her own children. I have seen women who come from poor backgrounds seek wealthy men because they know financial security is very important, especially these days where people are losing their jobs left and right.
        She’s actually very smart even though she does come across as a gold digger I guess, but what does that make her ex and her current bf? Beauty-diggers? lol
        Now that I think about it…this man could’ve had any beautiful model, but he chose a woman who already has kids so that makes me think he really must love her to take on that because let’s fac eit, kids that young, it’s not easy and being a step father? Yeah, like I said, he must really love her.
        He could’ve had a 20 year old model but instead he went for a woman in her 30s.

      • TheOriginalKitten says:

        I hate terms like “gold-digger”, “home-wrecker”, “man-stealer” and really, any term that absolves men of their responsibility in a relationship.

        As far as the idea that “poor helpless men” are easily duped by a pretty face, well then that’s on them for not being more discerning and less superficial.

      • Truthtful says:

        @Observer: My main point was (besides that I agree with you on a lot of yours) that she IS a goldigger.

        And about him not dating a 20 yr old… actually it’s cultural : in France a man who dates significantly younger is considered as a fool (ex : our current president or the former economy minister who was the laughing stock of every other magazine and diner) men are educated from their younger age to prefer dating women their age (not matter what their age is …even in their 40’s and 50’s) and to value other traits than just beauty (as education, personality , etc.) so the average age difference between couples in our country is 2,1 years and in 1/3 couples the woman is the older one.

        Example: Guillaume Canet who is 41 was married to Diane Krueger 38 and now in a partnership with Marion Cotillard 39 …represents perfectly our dating culture

        Antoine Arnault has always dated women his age like most men here, being interesting and with experience is a plus for women TOO here ! 😉
        So it’s not really a plus in this story.

        Of course he must really love her.But it doesn’t distract from the fact that she is a major goldigger.And that was my point: she pursues essentially great wealth and that”s her main dating line.

        A lot of models were really poor and don’t have this unattractive pattern, olga Kurylyenko for example who was crazy poor held her own without leeching to anyone.

        PS: the french gossip are excellent !! very saucy and fascinating! 😉

      • Truthtful says:

        @Originallykitten:

        Ok. Particularly interested in materialistic traits if you prefer.

        and I am far from considering men as these poor helpless things used and abused by a woman: they know and they chose purposely what they are getting into.

        But it doesn’t distract from the fact that making “catching a billionaire” a main career is a very ugly trait in one’s personality.

        Even if you were poor, pursuing once you are nicely set on this leeching path doesn’t say something really nice about you…

      • drea says:

        I think this could be true if the billionaires in question were hot. Hot, young, kind billionaires are indeed unicorns. 😉

        But honestly, I don’t think she had to work all that hard to attract the attention of another billionaire. It’s not like she’d been cut off by Portman and was back living in a shoebox flat, spending all her jobless down time taking care of her kids and plotting the capture of another rich guy. Some women (at least one who I know personally) really do just live the kind of charmed life where they are constantly pursued by extravagantly rich men, regardless of age or “baggage.”

      • Truthtful says:

        “But honestly, I don’t think she had to work hard to attract the attention of another billionaire.”

        For this one who is surrounded by all of the most gorgeous models and women of the planet (that work for the Louis Vuitton group)… she actually had to work. She did have to work very hard to have him, even betraying her friend (Hélène de Fougerolles, the then living partner of Antoine Arnault) to have him…and it’s a very well known fact around here. Frankie raider, Virginie Ledoyen or Anna Mouglalis are amongst his exes, he is very sought after towards the most beautiful women in the world… because well even if he is not handsome, young billionaire are rarest than unicorns!

        Eurostar was her second home for a whole year to secure him, she spend all her time pursuing him, so yeah she worked hard, really really hard actually…

        But I do admit that some women are more gifted in their game than others!

      • TheOriginalKitten says:

        “But it doesn’t distract from the fact that making “catching a billionaire” a main career is a very ugly trait in one’s personality”

        Isn’t her career as a model her “main career”?
        She’s worth $24M, do you really think she needs to “catch” a billionaire?
        And again, you can’t “catch” a man who doesn’t want to be “caught”.

        Anyway, I can see by your many comments here that your issues with this woman is personal. Personally, I’ve never heard of her before and could care less about how many rich men she dates. I just can’t stand it when women blame other women for a choice that men were just as complicit in making, that’s all.

      • Val says:

        @TheOriginalKitten

        Yeah I also take issue with the “man-stealing” thing, yes it’s despicable to go after a guy that has a partner already, if he is loyal and committed, he shouldn’t be “stealable” at all.
        If what Truthful says is true, he is just as guilty as she is for hurting Hélène de Fougerolles.
        Just because men can think with their penises doesn’t mean they’re obliged to.

      • Truthtful says:

      • LAK says:

        It’s an interesting turn around in comments when Salma Hayek is deemed a gold digger, but poor under privileged Natalie is simply lucky to have happened upon her 2 wealthy long term partners.

        At this rate, we should absolve Wendi Deng completely because you know, born poor, only trying to get on in life.

        The fact remains that the supermodel ATM retirement plan is a very real thing – look at all those supermodels who happen to have hooked up with Billionaires.

        And women actively pursuing rich men is a cliché at this point. I live in a part of London where you see it in action every time you head out for drinks. Sensible people with far too much common sense and self respect never understand it.

        In the case of Natalie, the fact that he was her friend’s husband didn’t put her off. The fact that he is currently smitten is no reflection of their relationship in the long run. Afterall, Murdoch was equally smitten with Wendi at one point.

        Guest: how does a woman secure a rich man? Ask Elle MacPherson. She’s a well known rich man hunter.

      • Truthtful says:

        @LAK: thanks LAK you perfectly summed it up! Everything, the Elle Mcpherson case and everything!
        Thank you for being way more articulate than I was in putting in a perspective exactly what I was trying to say!

        Sometimes you need someone with a better way with words to explain your exact thinking! 😉

      • Anna says:

        Just out of a curiosity – what the process of pursuing a rich man look like?
        For me it’s a straight out of hell scenario. All the models and wannabees targeting rich guys with huge egos who are well aware that they’re the ultimate prize

  25. Adrien says:

    She’s one of the best models ever. I remember buying only fashion mags with her on the cover. She’s really striking in person. She short for ramp, I think she’s really just around 5’8″, but she’s really good for editorials.

  26. Josefa says:

    Natalia is my favorite model. She’s absolutely stunning. You have no idea who she is and I don’t blame you, but she really is important in the industry and one of the most iconic models of the past decade. She just didn’t achieve much mainstream fame because she’s not a VS angel – and those are the famous ones. But she’s huge in the world of high fashion.

    She’s boring, yeah, but I take that over Chanel Iman and her insufferable brat behavior. She’s really nice and professional, according to those who work with her, and she has her own charity foundation for building safe playgrounds for kids across Russia. And she’s so pretty!

    Love Natalia. I much prefer when fashion mags give professional models their covers instead of some random actress.

    • TheOneandOnlyOnly says:

      THank you, and your comments are echoed by thousands, but the publishing/fashion industry won’t or can’t put beauties like Natalia on covers – I don’t want to see Jlo or Lady gaga ever again; seen enough of them.

    • manta says:

      I just love how she’s called a nobody here. To me she’s had a more interesting career than many of the models so hyped today because they are picked by VS,which is apparently the Graal in fashion.
      Maybe her exposure is bigger in Europe. I remember how she was really sought after by Saint-Laurent, Gautier,Givenchy or Lacroix and how the fact she was back on a runway less than 2 weeks after the birth of her baby was a big deal.Her lingerie contract with Etam made it imossible to avoid her picture in mags/posters/ads.

      An I usually forget fashion editorials very quickly but the one she did for Vogue about ten years ago really sticked with me. It was a Lewis Carroll theme, she was Alice and Lagerfeld,Lacroix and many other big names posed with her.

      • Josefa says:

        I remember that editorial! I loved the picture of her with Galliano (?) and the flamingos. The one she did a couple of years later,as a gritty Red Riding Hood was stunning too. My favorite, though, is one she did for Numéro with metallic-like makeup. And her Euphoria ads! She was Calvin Klein’s go-to girl for a long time.

        To make a comparison – if Gisele Bundchen is the Robert Downey Jr. of modeling financially, Natalia must’ve been around Leo DiCaprio status in her prime. And it’s not like her career has died – she’s still getting consistent blue chip work. Actually, it’s HUGE an American magazine like this gave her a cover. The only models who get American fashion covers are Gisele and Kate Moss – Natalia is at that level. She’s just far from scandalous, opposed to what the author thinks.

      • Crazy Reader says:

        “if Gisele Bundchen is the Robert Downey Jr. of modeling financially, Natalia must’ve been around Leo DiCaprio status in her prime.” Are you kidding? Natalia is a big name in the fashion world, but she wasn’t popular. The general public didn’t know her. Gisele was THE it girl.

  27. I’ll take her on the cover. At least she’s a model (remember when magazines only had models on their covers?). And her story is interesting enough. I remember her from her heyday but agreed with the posters saying who? because if you weren’t on style.com or paying attention you wouldn’t know who she is. However if you paid attention to the runway shows you’d remember her as being very beautiful. She and another model around her time (can’t remember her name, they look similar) I had girl crushes on. Maybe if she had gone the Giselle route and dated an actor she’d have Gisele’s recognition.

    That said I did have to laugh at her “we don’t have a big home” comment. Unhuh, but I’m sure it’s 500x the size of what every other normal Parisian lives in. When I first lived in Paris I was used to my tiny flat and I remember I went to the home of a lady who works for Conde Nast and thinking OmG I didn’t know they made apartments this big. I got lost and she only lived on one floor, so I can imagine the duplex or even triplexes are truly shocking to see in person. And I doubt this woman and her banker husband have Arnualt money.

    • Jadzia says:

      You make me so glad to live in Tours, haha. If we were in Paris we would be living in a shoebox.

      • I know when I come home I almost forget what a normal house actually looks like. Granted I’m from the suburbs filled with McMansions where rooms are touted as “Texas sized” but the size of my first two apartments in Paris were about the size of my bathrooms in America.

        I’m not exactly fussy, I know space is an issue in Paris and the rental market is horrendous, but at this point I’m just thankful for 30m2, which is pretty sad. I’m always stunned by people who can live in 9m2-20m2, which is sadly the norm. But you get used to it. Just hope you can find one with a mezzanine so at least the apartment appears larger.

  28. Truthtful says:

    “do you really think she needs to “catch” a billionaire?”

    That was exactly my point… and that’s why it’s quite a more than despicable trait! She doesn’t “need” it. She could have had a real career instead…

    “Anyway, I can see by your many comments here that your issues with this woman is personal. Personally, I’ve never heard of her before and could care less about how many rich men she dates”

    Errrrr- not really!

    Maybe you never heard of her but over here she is a gossip staple! Everyone knows her ways!

    “I just can’t stand it when women blame other women for a choice that men were just as complicit in making, that’s all.”

    I never excused the complicit of men in this very ugly trading process, your are assuming it!
    But again it’s not because both are ugly that it will paint her prettier you know… you do know that right?

    Even in this thread without using the word you assumed she married for money (as in you couldn’t do it yourself) isn’t what exactly goldigging is all about?
    The fact that the other party is as superficial doesn’t erase what is the ugly motive of “marrying for money” as you said it yourself…

    • TheOriginalKitten says:

      Ok yeah, you definitely have some strange issue with this woman.

      I don’t care enough to argue with you but I have to address this:

      “Even in this thread without using the word you assumed she married for money”

      I never “assumed” anything, I was just addressing your insistence that she’s a “gold-digger”.
      As I previously stated, I know nothing about this woman other than the fact that she’s a successful model. My comments were made in reference to the hypothetical supposition that she was only after his money.

      I guess I should have just taken Eliza’s approach and agreed to disagree with you.

      • eliza says:

        Lol. Kitten. Agreed with all your posts, as usual!

      • Truthtful says:

        “Ok yeah, you definitely have some strange issue with this woman” maybe the only issue is that she is a huge source of gossip here and is not well liked.( à la hilaria baldwin type) and then it maybe very local !

        Yeah let’s agree to disagree then :)!

      • TheOriginalKitten says:

        Thanks, Eliza 😉

        @Truthful-That could very well be true. I admit that I’m not much in the French Gossip loop and I only really hear stuff here and there from my French family.

      • Truthtful says:

        @ theOriginalKitten: next time you will have a blast with all the Arnault’s or Pinault’s celebrity entangling / successions drama! 😉 LOL!

    • Guest says:

      Agree entirely here with TheOriginalKitten.

      This is an incredibly negative narrative, painting a woman in a predatory, mercenary light. How does one “secure” a rich man anyway? I know nothing of this model besides what’s in this article, but she seems to have done a lot of good charitable works in Russia.

  29. Black Veronica Lake says:

    She’s beautiful.

  30. M.A.F. says:

    Not sure how her personal life is scandalous. Sounds like a typical break-up then get with someone else story. If she were a guy, the word “scandalous” wouldn’t be mention. That being said, I have no idea who this woman is. These photos are okay.

  31. Yelp says:

    I love LOVE Natalia Vodianova and wish she was featured more!