Ned RockNRoll hasn’t had a job in years, he’s Kate Winslet’s ‘house-husband’

FFN_NEW_Winslet_Kate_061514_51452587

People yell at me when I refer to someone like Eric Johnson as “Jessica Simpson’s K-Fed.” They yell because I seem dismissive of men who don’t have full-time jobs, men who seem to just be content being financially supported by the ladies in their lives. I think in Eric’s case in particular, he’s probably a hands-on father and Jessica loves that. But I also think she’s basically paying him an allowance to spend his days playing golf and smoking weed, and those kinds of money issues breed resentment. Anyway, I was thinking about the J-Simp and Eric situation when I read this story about Kate Winslet and Ned Rocknroll. Ned is billionaire Richard Branson’s nephew and Ned has been around money all of his life and the only real job he’s ever had is some executive gig with his uncle, the product of blatant nepotism. And now he doesn’t have to work, because he’s married to Kate Winslet.

When Sir Richard Branson’s Virgin Galactic spacecraft makes its long-awaited debut commercial flight later this year, it will be without its most prominent employee. I hear that Kate Winslet’s husband, Ned Rocknroll, who is Branson’s nephew, has left his post as a marketing executive with the space tourism company.

Tycoon Branson confirms that Ned no longer works for Virgin Galactic, but is keen to deny scurrilous rumours that he was sacked because he hardly did any work or even turned up at the office. ‘There is no truth in it,’ his spokesman tells me.

However, mystery surrounds exactly when Ned parted company with the firm. ‘He left of his own accord to pursue other interests,’ says one of Kate’s friends, who claims that Rocknroll had, in fact, left his uncle’s firm before he met the Oscar-winning actress in 2011. Yet Ned took Kate to the launch of Virgin Galactic’s space airport in New Mexico amid great fanfare later that year. The world’s media have since been led to believe that he continued to work for the space tourism firm.

The friend is unable to say what 36-year-old Rocknroll(who changed his name from Edward Lyulph Abel Smith by deed poll) does now. He would appear to be a house-husband, for earlier this year, Winslet — who gave birth to the couple’s first child, Bear, last December — questioned why other men could not be as involved with their children as Ned.

The Titanic star, 38, also has a son, Joe, ten, from her eight-year marriage to Skyfall director Sam Mendes and a daughter, Mia, 13, by first husband, film producer Jim Threapleton.

‘Ned is absolutely incredible and he looks after all of us,’ said Winslet. ‘The other day, Joe asked: “How come there are no other dads in the school run?” And we both went: “It’s because this is the way we’re doing it.” The kids really love that.’

She met Ned the same year that he divorced his previous wife, Eliza Pearson, whose father, Viscount Cowdray, has an estimated fortune of £300million.

[From The Daily Mail]

Hasn’t worked for Virgin since 2011 you say? He was sacked for never showing up except to pick up a paycheck you say? Well, I never. I mean, it’s not like we needed further proof (beyond his name change) to show that Ned really isn’t that much of a catch. I guess Kate is happy that she’s got a house-husband who likes doing the school runs and “taking care” of his family while she goes out and makes the money. But… I don’t know. It just seems like this is going to cause more problems in the long term.

wenn3802398

Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet and WENN.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

136 Responses to “Ned RockNRoll hasn’t had a job in years, he’s Kate Winslet’s ‘house-husband’”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. MoxyLady007 says:

    If they are happy, then that’s all that matters. I think it’s great that he is a stay at home dad.

    • CM says:

      Me too! I know my other half wishes he could do the same. Surely it’s whatever works for them and their family, right?

    • KJP says:

      I agree. No one bats an eye when someone like Matt Damon’s wife stays at home to take care of the kids but when a guy does it it’s going to “cause resentment issues”? Seems a bit ridiculous to me.

      • CM says:

        Exactly. And why the inverted commas around ‘house-husband’ like it’s a joke? He stays at home and looks after the kids etc while she earns the money. What on earth is wrong with that? Make fun of his name and his family connections if you like, but surely not this??

        P.s. They’ve probably been sketchy about his job to the media because of articles like this!

      • Wallamalooo says:

        100% agree.

      • L says:

        Exactly. It’s good for the kids to have a full time parent at home, and it doesn’t matter if it’s Dad or Mom. It’s normal and fine.

      • Rice says:

        Spot on, KJP! Is there a cemented rule that says men must work when in a relationship/marriage? If he’s taking care of the kids, then it’s all good.

      • Jenny12 says:

        Here is the thing- it’s cool to reverse roles and be the primary caregiver. No issues. But this guy was barely working beforehand, and people are saying bluntly that he didn’t even show up at work beyond collecting pay and that was way before he married Kate. You can generally smell laziness, and that is what he reeks of. He has shown himself to be disinterested in working as a rule. Same with Federline and same with Johnson. Prior to starting families and relationships with the famous women, they were erratically employed and showed little interest in being responsible. Federline now has five children with three different women and he still has no job. They were showing what kind of men they were before they ever were famous for marrying celebrities.

      • Flan says:

        I agree, IF they actually do all the work a housewife does.

        I know two women with house-husbands. The women still do the shopping after they come home after a busy day and whenever I was there, they cooked and did whatever sudden cleaning was needed as well.

        This while the guys half paid attention to the kids and half watched tv/played video games/just launched on the couch. One of those women has few visitors, so you would think a ‘house-husband’ would take care of at least the cleaning whenever she got an hour talking to a friend.

      • Tiffany :) says:

        I agree, 100%. I have friends where the mom is a doctor and they decided it would be best if the father quit his job and stayed at home to take care of the kids. He isn’t a freeloader, just as moms aren’t freeloading when they stay home to take care of the kids.

        The idea that raising children is a diminished, unrespectable role isn’t right when society tries to attach it to women, and it isn’t right when society tries to attach it to men who do the same thing.

        Also, the idea that he didn’t show up to work, but just was there to collect a paycheck was NOT confirmed or supported, in fact it was denied.

    • Kate2 says:

      +1 to everything said above. Who knows how it will work out but you could say that about anyone’s marriage. If they’re happy then good for them.

      • homegrrrl says:

        I have lived to see the dawning of a new world! Praise creation and let this House Husband trend continue!!

      • Rigaou says:

        And who’s to say he isn’t sitting on some enormous trust fund? Just because he doesn’t have a job doesn’t necessarily mean he is without means.

    • Ag says:

      i agree – i would LOVE to make enough money for my husband to stay at home, take care of our son, take care of stuff at home, etc. they’re both loaded and can afford it. i can’t see for the life of me what is “wrong” with this situation.

      what i particularly dislike about stories with this “theme” is that it never goes the other way. a woman in his situation would not be called a golddigger (since he’s rich) and would not be told that she should get a job.

    • don't kill me i'm french says:

      +1

    • Stef Leppard says:

      If I made a sh!t-ton of money for doing very little work and was home most of the time taking care of the kiddos, I would totally encourage my hubs to not have a job. He has lots of hobbies that he would love to stay home and do. He’s not a lazy man by any means, but why would he work at some thankless job if he didn’t have to?

    • Pandy says:

      Yeah, don’t see why this won’t work. Someone needs to be more home involved, so why not him? If she’s okay with being the major breadwinner, all power to them.

      • Ronia says:

        He is very very RICH. She is by no means any breadwinner and I highly doubt he could be called anything like a golddigger since his fortune is far beyond Kate’s dreams.

      • Aotearovian says:

        Ronia: Can you cite your source? There’s lots of speculation about his net worth, but I’ve yet to see anything factual.

    • Malificent says:

      Yep! I know several couples who’ve chosen to have the husband stay home — and it works just fine for them. It’s only an ego problem for men because society chooses to make it a problem. Several of my friends were in tenure-track positions at their universities, and had limited flexibility to take time off, while their husbands did. In a couple of other cases, the wives just plain made more money, and it made sense financially.

      Mr. RockNRoll sounds like he’s surfed through much of his life, but if he’s a hands-on dad and he’s taking care of business on the home front these days, I’m not going to belabor the point of his not having a formal job.

    • Mixtape says:

      Yes, agree with all of the above. Also, so many celeb-on-celeb marriages fail (perhaps including KW’s prior ones) as a result of scheduling conflicts, essentially living on separate coasts due to work, etc. These conflicts are easier to avoid when one half of the couple does not have a job, and if money is no object, why would he/she?

    • Bob Loblaw says:

      As a stay at home wife, I have no problem with a stay at home husband. Can we please drop the gender stereotyping and allow people to do what they want?

  2. Abbott says:

    If you can’t depend on a dude named Ned RockNRoll to hold down a job in the space-travel division of his uncle Branson’s empire, who can you depend on???

  3. Eleonor says:

    Women have been housewives for centuries and nobody find “a stay at home mum” strange, if a woman brings the check and he stays at home and does all the duties well I will not judge.
    Sometimes it’s even difficult to find a man who accept to be “the husband of” a much more succesfull wife. I am thinking at Guy Richie and Madonna for example, I’ve always had the feeling that on the long run her success might have affected their marriage.

    • BangersandMash says:

      agreed, Eleonor.

      Let’s look at the dynamics in today’s context. In today’s society, women have just as much pressure to have a good paying job of status as men do. I speak from personal experience when I was jobless how many guys didn’t even consider me a dating companion because they need ‘an independent type’. There are many exceptions, especially from history’s point of view, and how it’s shaped who we think should be the primary domestic caretaker of the family.
      But in today’s society, if you can’t hold a job as a woman, you’re just as frowned upon as a man is.
      So, for sure, I predict there will be issues in the long run with her and Ned. Because, she too at some point or another, while with Sam Mendez, also had to get up and go work again, while with children.
      I agree on the Madonna/Guy dynamic, it’s not easy to accept a more successful wife as a man who has already established their own status.

  4. Charlotte says:

    So, when I was younger I had a ‘type’ that my friend described as ‘little monster-y thingee’. She always knew if I liked a guy if to her, they looked like little monster-y things. I think Ned fits the bill, but I’m pleased to report I feel nothing for him.

    Nope.

    Damnit, I probably *would* once. And then cry in the shower.

  5. The Wizz says:

    Nothin wrong with a stay at home dad. Loved it when my other half was doing it, it was a huge help to me when I was working as an executive.

    • chaine says:

      i agree. i have a relative who is a college professor. she got married in the early 70’s and her husband was the stay-at-home parent, which was very unusual back then, and frowned upon. i never understood the vitriol directed at him by other family members. he was(is) a very nice guy, and their kids turned out respectable members of society.

  6. Maria says:

    personally i think it sounds great.

    it makes me angry that this site is always the first to bash young starlets when they talk about feminism. they are bashed in a very condenscending way. but now when a man likes spending time with his child and doing work thats not traditional for men he gets bashed to. THATS anti-feminist. it annoys me that nowadays so many people on the internet claim to be feminists and use all the words from that movement but it ever only applies to women. a woman working 120 hours a week? GREAT! a man taking care of children and not having a high powered job? LOSER!

    do you think all men want to spent all their time in an office? ask older men what they regret about their lives, all of them will tell you they regret spending so little time with their families.

    and as this post proves its certainly not exclusivly the fault of men. if some women even in the year 2014 cant fall in love with the person but only with the status of a man then no wonder we dont have equality.

    i’ve read a couple of “the man will have ego problems” comments here. seems more like some women have problems loving a man who makes less money than her. easier to blame it on the men…this self congratulating (“we gals are so awesome, men are intimidated”) and men bashing must stop.

    seriously, always lamenting about equal pay but not accepting when men make less or take care of the household. If you dont want men to make less than you than you cant complain about men making more in the same breath…

    ps i dont see any celebitchy articles bashing Matt Damons wife. (no, i dont want that to happen, if its works for them, great)

    • The Wizz says:

      Here here!!!!!

    • Lucy2 says:

      Excellent post!

    • jinni says:

      Preach!!

    • Bridget says:

      You must not be reading very closely, because they’re criticising young starlets for saying things like “I’m not a feminist but I believe in the power of women” “I’m not a feminist because I want men to have equality too” or “she can’t criticize me, that’s not feminist”.

      Kate Winslet gets bashed because she married someone who changed his name to Ned Rock N Roll. I’m pretty sure that has nothing to do with feminism.

      • MaiGirl says:

        Exactly! I don’t think that this is a gender issue. If a woman had a sketchy, nepotistic past in which she was a lazy employee, and kept hooking up and marrying very wealthy men, we would DEFINITELY be calling her a gold-digger! Especially if she legally changed her name to something like “Lisa SwimsuitModel” or “Jane StripperHeels.” I applaud discussions about gender equity, and I have absolutely no problem with stay-at-home husbands (my father was one for a while, and frankly, he was a better care-giver than my mother!), but I think those of you making good-for-the-gander arguments are missing the point about why some of us find this dude a little shady! 😀

    • Erinn says:

      Agreed.
      My grandfather had a very lengthy military, social services, and town council career. When I was doing mandatory over time, he would be so concerned. He felt that he had sacrificed too much with his family for the sake of work.

      I don’t like that he gets bashed for staying at home. Bash his name all you want – it’s ridiculous. But if he doesn’t want to work, has the means to do it, and spends his down time with his children – great.

    • Andrea1 says:

      @Maria you just said it all
      Execellent!!!

    • Franny Days says:

      Ugh it’s hard for me to not take these articles personally as my father was a stay at home dad. Maybe if you had one stay at home dad that you supported then I wouldn’t think you were trying to put a K-Fed label on every single man who happens to be married to a woman who makes more money than him. One of the bloggers on this site even tried to put the label on Natalie Portman’s current husband. It’s just annoying, honestly.

      • Franny Days says:

        Oops sorry Maria didn’t mean for my comment to be a response to yours. I agree with everything you said, my comment was addressed to the blogger :).

      • Bridget says:

        Of the men that are most frequently given thw K Fed label (and I’ll include Millepied since you’ve mentioned him) like Eric Johnson, Dean McDermott, Benjamin Millepied, and of course K Fed – all of them were in committed, long term relationships (3/4 were in fact married) with non-famous women, and each of those men appearing to ditch their non-famous spouse at the first opportunity to hook up with a celebrity and live a life of luxury.

        Personally, I think these famous, successful women would be in a much better place if they married someone who was willing to stay home and take care of the family, considering g how many of those celebrity marriages break up because the couple never actually spends time together, with their crazy competing schedules.

    • Irishae says:

      I agree with MaiGirl. It doesn’t have anything to do with being a stay-at-home-dad or overarching gender issues. He just seems like a sleazy dirtbag with or without Kate. Simple as that.

    • Ronia says:

      Great post! I’m sick of the throwing terms around just because it’s what? Trendy? Pff.

    • carla says:

      I agree. What’s the problem with this? Who cares if the guy is a house-husband? If he wanted to work, he would. He doesn’t so he doesn’t. But this person is the same one who also called an osteopath a quack, so I”m not surprised at her opinion.

  7. GiGi says:

    I’m a total workaholic, so I have a hard time when people don’t work… if I believed that he really was a “househusband” and did the primary care of the children, household management, etc. then I wouldn’t take issue. But I’m guessing they have, at the very least, a housekeeper and a nanny. So then what does he do?

    The women in my life who have household help but don’t work outside the home spend their days in a brainless loop of lunches, dinners, the gym and the spa. Maybe they show up at the school once in a while for good measure. Work is so good for the soul – I think it kills people to have nothing required of them.

    • GoodNamesAllTaken says:

      I agree and disagree with you. I don’t officially “work.” I was a paralegal for 25 years, and I worked very hard and did get satisfaction of a sort from my jobs, but I never found a career that fed my soul. I would veer off on tangents every once in awhile, working at a museum, a florist, a not-for-profit, in retail, for a chef. But at the end of the day, what I love is doing volunteer work, entertaining, painting, reading, cooking, sailing, gardening, exercising, decorating, spending time with my husband, friends and family, helping my aging parents, traveling with my husband or friends and running our two houses. I feel very, very lucky to have the life I have. I don’t think it’s brainless at all. I see so many women trapped in jobs that are basically paper pushing and wasted time, and then they have to try to do everything I do and more if they have children in the hours before and after work. So I disagree that you have to have a job to feed your soul, but totally agree that you have to have a LIFE that feeds your soul. You’re just fortunate to have found a career that meets that requirement.

      • GiGi says:

        I wouldn’t call any of your activities brainless, GNAT! Those are all things which are enjoyable to you and require something of you. I’m talking about women I know, of whom nothing is required. They literally turn to mush and just shop to pass the time. They’re mostly very depressed. You obviously fill your time with a lot of things that bring you joy! THAT is wonderful – and, though you may not be earning a paycheck for them – do fit the definition of work, in that they you are providing a service.

        Even though I love my “actual” work – I also volunteer and am active in my community – I consider those to also be work type things that also feed my soul!

      • GoodNamesAllTaken says:

        Yes, I think we agree on what’s important in life. I didn’t take your comment personally. I certainly know women who fit your description, and I agree, it’s a very depressing existence. I’m sort of a hybrid, because I did work for a long time and had a lot of pressure and long hours. I think it gave me discipline about how I spend my days and setting goals and accomplishing them. Whatever you choose to do, you only get out of it what you put in. I wish I had found a career that I loved, but I just never did, or at least not one with a paycheck. You’re fortunate. I’m also lucky because my husband respects and values my contributions our life, and doesn’t see it as less than his as far as our overall happiness is concerned.

        ETA I read this and thought you might rightly think I was not all that disciplined in how I spend my days since I spend a lot of it commenting on here. 🙂

      • GiGi says:

        LOL! I comment here a lot, too (obviously) – but I’m stop in to CB and Facebook frequently, but briefly through the day. I just got off a call with our window supplier and am waiting for an email… so I’m here! You know I love you, GoodNames!

      • GoodNamesAllTaken says:

        Love you back, Gigi!

      • CatJ says:

        Thank you GNAT. I too worked at a career for 26 years, before I met my husband, and then had to leave the city I lived in for 23 years, to move for his job.
        I have tried lots of other jobs, veterinary manager, my own brokerage, a financial planner exec. assistant,… none gave me the satisfaction of my previous career, but, my first marriage, at age 48, is worth the sacrifice. Now, I volunteer, indulge my cooking hobby, have lots of plans for other hobbies, and really quite enjoy being “retired” at 57. The younger set of our friends, (in their 30s) don’t quite get that thinking, their jobs are everything….(but could I dogsit for them???) but I am very busy running the household, and can’t imagine working everyday and having to squeeze all my interests into a few spare hours. Granted, we have the advantage of careful investments and not expansive living. I almost died this past January from H1N1 and really do value things in a different way. I guess my point is, there is no right or wrong way to do this, and if this works for them, there should be no shaming.

      • GoodNamesAllTaken says:

        CatJ, I’m so glad you’re ok. An event like that surely does change your perspective.
        I understand about attitudes from other people. Someday they’ll get it. Or they won’t. Their problem, right?

    • maybeiamcrazy says:

      My mother was a housewife. She took care of us although she generally kept herself out of other chores. She did help to many charities and I am pleased that she thaught me to ‘give back’. But sometimes I wonder how she standed it. She was happy, had many friends and wasn’t isolated or forced into staying at home. I know everybody’s different. But I can’t even consider being stay-at-home mum/ housewife as an option for myself. Some of my mother’s friends fit into your description of rich housewives. But generally, these women lived or waited to live like this their whole lives. I hope you are able to make the distinction between them.

      Maybe Ned has an interest that does not count as ‘work’. Maybe he really loves spending time with the children. Although it is not my way of life at all, I respect it.

    • Esmom says:

      Love your back and forth, GNAT and GiGi. I am currently feeling a bit trapped as a stay at home mom, ready for a new chapter although unsure of what it may be. I feel happy with my life and my kids (one of whom has special needs) and my volunteer gigs keep me busy, it is all definitely not mindless. However, when I am not working (I have been a freelance writer since I quit my full time job 12 years ago and in recent years the work has dwindled to next to nothing) I just cannot shake a feeling of guilt about not contributing financially. I admire you both for finding what “feeds your soul” and feeling appreciative of that fact and of what matters in life. Rock on, ladies!

      • GoodNamesAllTaken says:

        Esmom, you’ll find your next chapter. But for now, don’t you dare feel guilty about not contributing financially – you would have to pay someone a fortune to do everything that you do! I admire you very much for it, and feel confident that you will find the balance. It takes a lot of thought, and I still get off the rails sometimes. But I know from your comments on here that you are insightful, intelligent and kind. You will keep working until you get the life you want and need. Please don’t undervalue yourself or your tremendous contributions to your family. I know it’s easy to do.

      • Esmom says:

        GoodNamesAllTaken, thank you for your thoughtful comments. They are a sweet ray of sunshine on an otherwise gray and gloomy day!

    • Ronia says:

      First of all, you may be a workaholic but there is no law saying everyone MUST work. It’s a right, not an obligation, so I don’t understand why everyone MUST work, really. On top of that, the man is so rich he will never really need anyone else’s money, least Kate’s. He can support all of them for the rest of their lifes if she decides tomorrow she will have another child and never work again. Aside from that, with THREE kids in the house… well, I can say that there are plenty of things to do. Even if they have a nanny (which I also did have) and help (which I also did have). There are drivings here and there, extracurriculars, sports, competitions, recitals, playdates, God, my head was spinning. Aside from the quality time each child needs – playing together, reading, even setting the table for a family dinner, gardening together, et cetera, et cetera. Endless. If a man has the opportunity to give all this to his and his partner’s children, that’s great! On another note, there are simply such people of both genders. I have a friend whose husband just loves to stay at home. He does stuff around the house, cooks with the kids, makes puzzles with them, teaches them about trees, flowers (thay are almost always in their beautiful garden), he just belongs inside there. I couldn’t imagine the house without him. He fits there. That’s all.

  8. Lucy2 says:

    I think a dad staying home to raise kids is great. The only thing I ever question is what Jessica’s husband did before they had kids.

  9. Jade says:

    If Kate doesn’t mind and he’s not an awful husband and father, I don’t see the problem. Why work when you don’t need to? Isn’t that why we work towards early retirement? To spend time with family, friends and enjoy life in general.

    • Mitch Buchanan Rocks! says:

      This makes sense – he must be decent for Kate to get with him – maybe he treats her super well and makes her laugh and has a good sense of humour and is good with kids – K-Fed gets a bad rap for this but he comes across as a great father. Men get the short shift becasue it seems they are not ‘allowed’ to be nurturers and care givers without being thought of as a layabout – a big double standard in our society. Women are not necessarily the nurturing caring souls they are automatically given credit for. Many women should not have children but do and many men who are caring cannot raise the children because of all the gender norm/role nonsense going on in society.

  10. TheOriginalPuppy says:

    Maybe he has hidden talents. 😉

  11. J says:

    K Fed was trying to exploit Britney by using her to further his own career. Eric and Ned do none of that. They seem very happy to be full-time parents while their wives make absurd money, and that’s wonderful for them. Having a full time parent at home can be really beneficial to children, especially very young ones. You know what does cause resentment, though? If the less successful member of the relationship tries and tries and tries and never achieves their career goals while the other one flies high. If this is what Johnson and RockNRoll (ugh) want, good for them.

  12. Louise177 says:

    I guess because it’s the traditional role for men to work people assume that men are spending their days smoking weed and playing golf. A lot of men stay home with the kids now. Some because of lost jobs but also the parents want somebody home full-time. It’s just that the woman makes more money. No need to degrade men for staying home. That almost never happens to women.

  13. Bridget says:

    There’s a difference between being a house husband and stay and home dad, and specifically targeting someone as a significant other because of their money (we know what the word for that is).

  14. smee says:

    Her last partners had full time jobs and they didn’t work out, so maybe she likes/needs the extra support of a stay-at-home husband/father. I don’t really see the “shame” in it.

  15. Jenns says:

    The issue isn’t that they stay home. It’s that they seem to seek out someone to support them. Ned got his uncle to give him a job only so he could collect a paycheck until he found Kate who would pay his way in life. And honestly, who is doing more work at home? Ned or the nanny.

    • siri says:

      This! It’s not about reversed roles in a household/family. That’s fine, nothing wrong with it. But this article is about a concrete person, a man who got promoted by his rich uncle, was seemingly released due to a lack of ‘performance on the job’, and now lives off Kate’s earnings. They have a nanny, so it’s not far-fetched to think she does most of the housekeeping. Nice that he shows up at school sometimes, and if Kate is fine with it- fine 🙂 I guess we’ll see for how long she’s gonna like this.

    • Ronia says:

      He is LOADED. It’s very questionable who got married for money, considering his fortune.

      • Bridget says:

        I thought the money was Richard’s? Why would his nephew have some of Richard’s money outside of what he would be paid for a “job”?

      • Aotearovian says:

        This is the third time you’ve said this on this thread, but I’ve never seen evidence of his net worth – can you link?

  16. Adrien says:

    What’s the use of having that name if you aren’t some kind of a rock musician? At least be an air guitarist or something. He looks like a Rupert. No offense to Ruperts but that is how he looks. He should legally change his name to Rupert Ketchup.

  17. Rhiley says:

    There is a huge difference between stay at home dads and dead beat dads. I have several guy friends who are house husbands while the mamas bring home the bacon. It works for them. They save 1000s each year on day care, their children are rarely sick, and they are all comfortable within their family units. So no problem with stay at home dads. However, Ned Rocknroll seems sketch ball to me. Kate Winslet is one of those actresses that, as her fame grew, so did her ego, and the more interviews she gave, the less likable she became. She comes across as a little angry and defensive about her relationships with men. I think she probably has issues with being alone and this guy latched onto her and she is happy to have the attention. But why does he need to be Ned Rocknroll exactly? Why can’t he just be Edward Smith? Cute but boring Edward Smith whose uncle is famous and has a lot of money, but who himself has had a hard time keeping a steady job because he just isn’t quite sure he knows what he wants to do with his life. So weird to be Ned Rocknroll when you don’t have a band or act in indie films.

    • lucy2 says:

      I think she got defensive when she got pregnant with her 3rd child, and people/the media were making horrible comments and calling her awful names about how she has 3 children with 3 husbands. I can’t really blame her for wanting to defend herself a bit, especially when there are a lot of famous men who have children with multiple women and never got publicly called on it the same way she did.
      I’m with you on the name thing, I’ve never understood that. But whatever.

      • don't kill me i'm french says:

        Same

      • delorb says:

        Yes they have. Sports figures (black sports figures especially) get called out all the time. The football player for the Jets famously sat and listed all his kids and the world exploded.

        Face it. The girl is ghetto through and through. Three babies and three baby daddies? Check. An unemployed husband and proud of it? Check. Baby and baby daddy with a weird name? Check and check. Nothing wrong with being ghetto, if you OWN it (ghetto fabulous).

  18. tracking says:

    I’d love to have a house husband. More power to her!

    • ichsi says:

      Me too. Wouldn’t mind him looking like Neddie either. 🙂

      But yeah, I actually think that it is LESS likely there are going to be financial issues given his employment status. He’s used to depending on someone’s goodwill and apparently doesn’t have much ambition beyond that (I make it sound derisive, but I think that I’d do the same in his position. Live off my uncle’s fortune and marry some British actor hottie. Hmmmm).

      Guy Ritchie wanted to be recognised as an artist, not just as Madonna’s husband, this fellow however seems pretty happy in the trophy role. Good for him ang go Ned I say!

  19. captain says:

    Kate looks totally happy with him. Perhaps she has finally found the arrangement that works for her. It does look odd to me, and sort of embarassing considering his name. Well, at least she hasn’t changed hers, thank heavens. I think “Kate RockNRoll” is more than I could handle. Especially in some WWII drama aiming for an Oscar.

  20. dorothy says:

    She seems to have picked a loafer with this one. Not because he stays home with the kids, but because, reportedly he was a bit of a bum and lazy prior to hooking up with Kate. Sounds like he hit the mother load with her. Oh well, she doesn’t stay with them too long anyway.

  21. tarheel says:

    Do you have any idea how anti-feminist* this post is??? I expected better from Celebitchy staff.

    *Men and society in general benefit from feminism, and slagging Ned for being a “househusband,” complete with air quotes around househusband, is neither feminist nor beneficial.

  22. Louise says:

    Maybe Sam Mendes did leave her for Rebecca Hall, who knows. Maybe this relationship gives her a slight edge on the power front and makes her feel secure as he is totally reliant on her. It wouldn’t be for me but there you go.

  23. kibbles says:

    I sense that Ned RockNRoll is a loser, but this arrangement might actually work for him and Kate. She has not been lucky in love, even when she was married to an Oscar winning film director.

    They are not by any means a “normal” couple that might need to survive on two incomes. If an average woman with three kids making $30k each year were married to an unemployed man who also did not help around the house, I’d tell her to throw him to the curb.

    However, Kate is a millionaire and RockNRoll has family wealth. They live in a completely different stratosphere from the one we live in. They will never have to worry about money, and if they are both fine with RockNRoll being a house husband, then that is okay for them. As long as he is supportive, a hands-on dad, and a faithful husband, then I don’t see why this situation would make anyone resentful.

  24. eliza says:

    Ned looks very un-RocNRoll to me.

  25. Altariel says:

    She seems happy with the arrangement. I thought one reason she split with her first husband was that she earned so much more than him, and felt more comfortable with Sam Mendes on a financial level. Ned has family money, but he’s a nephew….does Branson pay him or set up a trust for him? If so, then I’m guessing Kate will stay fine with it. It just happens a lot, I don’t know if it’s anti-feminist, but so often a wealthy female celebrity just gets tired of footing all the bills if her husband can not. Not saying it’s right or wrong, and they probably knew what they were getting into…but when the love runs out, they might too!

  26. Faye says:

    Who would have guessed that a man who changed his last name to “RocknRoll” isn’t a serious type of person?

  27. Andrea says:

    Let’s be honest, in America women are viewed as lesser if they stay at home these days, especially with the economy when most people do not have the luxury to do so, one is viewed as MUST be rich (remember most women go back to work a mere 6 weeks after giving birth; I’ve only known ONE mother who took 3 months). So Americans would be horrified if a man stayed home too. I am an American living in canada now and to see both moms and dads spend lengthy amounts of time at home with the kids and be more family oriented is just lovely (1 year maternity leave up here, some even take two and most women breastfeed up here 1 year). It’s always shocking to me soo many Americans always pride family but push women back to work sooo quickly.

    My only worry for kate is that he is somehow taking advantage of her and her money/celebrity, but given he isn’t like Jessica Simpson’s husband, I don’t think we really need to worry. It is nice he stays at home with the kids, at least it isn’t just nanny central right?

  28. FingerBinger says:

    He’s a Branson. I would think that he has some money. Because he isn’t to a 9 to 5 doesn’t necessarily mean he might not be independently wealthy.

  29. pk says:

    Whatever works for them but I just don’t see this marriage surviving the long haul.

  30. Algernon says:

    To me it’s not about money or who’s the bread-winner, it’s about ambition and fulfillment. I can take care of my own self, so I don’t care how much a guy makes, just so long as he some kind of life ambition and is fulfilled by how he spends his time. I dated a man for several years who is a trust-fund baby, and though he was really nice and funny and I really did care about him, in the end, I could not stand his lack of ambition. He just didn’t do anything except smoke weed and sit around his house. It would’ve been one thing if he had a hobby (other than weed) or volunteered at least a few hours a week, but he didn’t.do.anything. He was completely unmotivated in life, because he had everything he needed and didn’t have to work for any of it. Ultimately it became very boring to spend time with someone who never did anything, and we broke up.

    If Ned RnR is truly fulfilled by staying home and caring for their children, great. But given the high likelihood that they have nannies, domestic staff and assistants to take care of the minutiae of life, I do wonder how he spends his time. Kate Winslet is an ambitious woman, and whatever the difference in income is or isn’t, a difference in ambition can be a killer.

    • Ally says:

      For a successful, busy, high-flying woman like Winslet, I can see the appeal of someone who knows that lifestyle (unlike her first husband) but will always be available (unlike her second husband). After a while, though, what do you talk about with this fellow?

      Also he’s a step-dad to two of her kids, so it’s a bit weird if he’s spending more time with them than either of their three biological parents.

  31. gracielove says:

    Wow, sexism much? Why does it matter who chooses to stay home? And, all men are not keen on working a 9 to 5 job. Gender roles in society suck. Let people do what they want. The only important thing is that the family is happy.

    • Jenny12 says:

      I am a feminist and would completely agree with what you said about gender roles, but not in this case. Ned showed what he was for years- a spoiled trust fund baby. He doesn’t want to work, does no charity work, and all this was prior to marrying Kate. If you’re home with your child and raising him or her, that’s your role, no matter your gender. Two of my close friends are female partners and one works and the other birthed their child (through a donor) and stays home with her. Male, female, it doesn’t matter. But you know when someone is a spoiled, lazy person- it shows. It shows with this guy, who couldn’t be bothered to work because his family is rich and looks for one soft landing after the other. Someone like Federline, who chooses to father 5 kids with 3 women and refuses to work is not making a gender statement; he’s a lazy ass. Same with Jessica Simpson’s husband who CHOSE not to work or attend school even before hooking up with her. You never see Matt Damon’s wife, who really IS working hard to raise her girls and isn’t constantly papped with Matt and who was working prior to meeting Matt. I know someone who is not happy that her husband has never worked, all through their relationship, but wants to be married, so she accepts it. He hangs out all day and all he does is pick up and drop off their kid to school and then goes on social media all day long. Very different from a stay at home dad I know who is his kids’ class parent (different grades) and president of the PTA and works in our community to better our schools. *rant over* 🙂

      • lunchcoma says:

        I’m totally willing to buy that Ned is lazy. But…is that the worst fault a person can have? I think it would be terribly annoying for most of us who struggle to pay the bills, but in a wealthy household it might not be much of an issue.

      • Ronia says:

        @lunchcoma

        Exactly. Not of an issue at all! besides, people have different kinds of ambitions. My great-grandfather spent his life trying to cultivate a particular rose bloom. And he was very ambitious about it. He was dedicated. It made him happy to pursue this dream, this goal.

  32. itsetsyou says:

    I’d be plain bored and I’m a woman, so I would get much more slack if I chose not to work.

  33. bammer says:

    Can he really be considered a “Stay At Home” Dad if they have nannies, housekeepers and assorted help? He’s just a lazy trust fund baby.

    • Ronia says:

      Well, I had a nanny and a cleaner and I do considered myself a “stay at home parent”, yes. I’m totally OK with being called “lazy” though. Don’t care at all. I was so busy then that when I finally returned to work, I felt like I was having a break half of the time. I still feel like it.

  34. lunchcoma says:

    Meh. It’s not as if he’s a golddigger, and Kate may not care if her husband wants to work to keep up appearances or not. Plenty of male celebrities have spouses who don’t work (I’m thinking particularly of Matt Damon and Christian Bale), and those marriages are some of the more stable ones in Hollywood.

  35. Ginger says:

    If we are going to be equals then there are going to be “house husbands” as well as “house wives”. Hey, future show idea BRAVO!!! The really wealthy house husbands of some “insert here” city!!!

  36. Kelly says:

    I think having a house husband is cool

  37. Kate says:

    Stay at home dads are one thing, but Kate and Ned have staff. He isn’t looking after the children, the full-time nanny is. He isn’t doing housework, the cleaner is. Apparently he spends his days like he always has, just hanging out with other unemployed rich kids. So he’s not a house husband or a stay at home dad, he’s just a guy who can’t hold down a job.

  38. Fan says:

    He is not working because he has tons of money and he does need to work. He likes being close to Kate and the kids. He does not need to stress his life to have money. Some people are just born lucky.

  39. Cupcake says:

    To me this issue is not about being a stay at home parent. It’s about a man who has, for all intents and purposes, never worked. I wouldn’t want a parent who has never worked. Working hard builds character, life experience, personal richness, and so forth. It’s OK to stop working so take care of your children for a few years, but be passionate about something besides coasting on someone else’s dime. In any case, he must have been born under a very lucky financially lucky astrological sign!!!!

  40. PoliteTeaSipper says:

    Warning, venting to follow. My husband brags about being a “house husband”. He is a college professor and his summer is basically wide open. He doesn’t cook, clean, take care of our dogs, or fix things around the house–but he expects me to do ALL these things when I come home from my full time job–and I have heart disease and more than one cardiologist has told me that I need to stay home and rest…but a professors salary doesn’t permit us to do that. Having to get up every day and work in pain while watching him sleep late knowing that the only thing he’s going to work on is his golf game causes a LOT of resentment…

    Hearing him giggle to his friends more than once that he wants to have a wife like theirs who makes six figures so he can do whatever he wants all day was my breaking point. If he wants to be a house husband, then he needs to take care of the household, and I grew tired of his temper tantrums whenever I tried to teach him how to cook simple dishes that he could have ready when I came home from work. I’ve slowly started getting my ducks in a row to protect my interests in event of a seperation.

    This hurts. I don’t have anyone to talk to IRL. The other thorn in my side is that I love cooking, cleaning, keeping house, crafts, lifestyle…and I’ve wanted to just tend to family. I’ve already had several heart attacks and one more will probably kill me, and I just want to slow down and tend to my family, but I can’t do that. It hurts to know my husband is surfing reddit while I’m working so hard to keep us financially afloat.

    Obviously there is a massive communication issue in my marriage and I hope Kate and her husband don’t have the same issue. If they’ve both been honest, real and upfront and he is a hands on dad I can’t throw shade, especially since I live with a husband who wasn’t honest and upfront with me. That is what causes resentment, duplicity and hiding from your spouse (no matter what the gender) your real reasons for getting married and what you really want from your relationship. Not just the sole act being the house spouse.

    Thanks for listening to me rant. That kind of just poured out, sorry :/

    • Jenny12 says:

      Hang in there. HANG IN THERE. Don’t be afraid of the idea of divorce or help. Don’t make yourself sick and figure out a way to live mindfully and happily. If your husband is not making you happy- is, in fact, making you sicker- then don’t be afraid to examine your options. God Bless You.

    • Becky1 says:

      I’m sorry @PoliteTeaSipper. Would your husband be willing to go to counseling?

    • lucy2 says:

      Sounds like a very tough situation, best wishes to you. Your health is most important, and you need to take care of yourself first. If that means counseling or a separation or whatever you need to do, I truly wish you the best with it.
      I wonder if there might be a support group or something for people with your same medical conditions. it might really help to have people to share with who can really understand what you’re going through, maybe your doctor knows of one?

  41. Meg says:

    it’s true that money is the number 2 reason people divorced these days. this makes me think of the middletons and how hard people are on them for ‘not working’ especially kate while she was waiting for and following william around-most of us aren’t from families that have more money than they’ll ever be able to spend so we see not working as ‘lazy’ but it’s a different social class with different ways of doing things than we’re used to. people like them may even see working as low brow whereas most of us don’t IMO
    I think if the genders were switched and jessica were the man marrying a woman who doesn’t work, she’d be called a gold digger instead of her ‘k-fed’.

  42. Fancyamazon says:

    I really think that this is fine. Obviously she knows what he has done/does, so I don’t see that it matters who is the breadwinner, especially at the level of wealth that these people swim in. I tell my husband at least once a week that if he thinks we can keep the lifestyle we have going that I would stay home and clean and cook and bake and generally look after the people and cats in our home full time. I don’t see a problem with this Ned person doing the same. It isn’t like they are starving. But then again, I don’t get all the fuss about people marrying “beneath” them either. If they are happy who cares?

  43. Meandyou says:

    I have absolutely zero problems with my husband making less money than me. I do however have a problem with lack of ambition. If my husband had told me that he likes to be a SAD when we were dating I would have bolted. I know a guy who broke off a serious relantionship with a woman because she told him she wanted to stay home if they had kids one day. None of my friends grew up with stay at home parents and we turned out fine. Kids don’t need one full time parent and even if I was making the same money that I was paying the daycare I would still work because I do not want to lose the skills and know how much harder it will be to go back after taking a break.

    This guy seems like a loser with no ambition to me. The stay at home dad is not the issue here.

    • dzeco says:

      Ned is not a loser, he is a fun guy and Kate is happy with him. He is rich but people on this forum are saying he is a loser! You don’t know Ned.

  44. tracking says:

    Maybe he’s a fun, eccentric guy who makes her laugh and enjoy life more. There are worse things. Life is short; work and money aren’t everything (clearly money not an issue for them).

  45. dzeco says:

    Ned Rocknroll doesn’t need a job and Kate Winslet is happy with him. She was unhappy with her previous husband Sam Mendes.