David Gregory ‘angry & humiliated’ by his ousting from ‘Meet the Press’

wenn3944503

There really isn’t a lot happening this week as far as fun gossip goes, so you’ll just have to let me talk about NBC News and how I don’t understand what the hell they’re doing over there. Last week, word came down that David Gregory was being pushed out of the Meet the Press anchor chair after six years – Gregory took over after Tim Russert passed away in 2008. Russert made Meet the Press into must-watch political debate and interviews every Sunday. But David Gregory’s tenure has been marked by sagging (if not plummeting) ratings and a pronounced decline in caché. No one watches it anymore. No one cares. Gregory rarely gets to hard-to-get interview and any kind of commentary is blah.

There’s been gossip about Gregory’s ousting for months now, and I guess NBC was lining up his replacement all this time. The new host will be… Chuck Todd. That’s a pretty good choice. Chuck and David came up through the ranks in a similar way – both were White House correspondents and respected political reporters, although I tend to think of Chuck Todd as more wonky (he loves stats) and more likeable (he seems to genuinely have a sense of humor). Still, I guess NBC News didn’t want to think outside of the “middle-aged white man” box for political commentary (although Andrea Mitchell did host MTP this past Sunday). But here’s an interesting wrinkle – apparently, NBC News mishandled Gregory’s exit, just like they mishandled Ann Curry’s exit.

Ousted “Meet the Press” anchor David Gregory was paid $4 million to leave NBC and signed a contract not to speak out against the network, sources told Page Six. Gregory, 43, who moderated the show for six years, was unceremoniously dumped from the political program on Thursday after dismal ratings and months of speculation about his departure. He has been replaced by NBC White House correspondent Chuck Todd.

A source said Gregory’s contract extended into next year, so NBC had to pay him for the rest of the term, plus an extra fee to ensure his silence. In return, he was asked to sign a nondisparagement clause, which explains — despite the drama behind the scenes — his saccharine message on Twitter to announce his departure.

“I leave NBC as I came — humbled and grateful. I love journalism, and serving as moderator of MTP was the highest honor there is,” he tweeted, adding, “I have great respect for my colleagues at NBC News and wish them all well. To the viewers, I say thank you.”

But quietly, sources say, Gregory is “angry and humiliated” at the way he was treated by NBC suits who let him twist in the wind through months of painful speculation before finally pulling the plug. Page Six reported that Gregory confronted NBC brass last week after continuous rumors he would be replaced by Todd.

NBC has tapped Andrea Mitchell to host this week’s show, denying Gregory a chance to say farewell — or anything else — on air. Todd takes over on Sept. 7. NBC declined to comment.
Gregory’s future may be at CNN. Page Six has reported that the network was developing a pilot for him, while others speculate he could land on “Crossfire” with Newt Gingrich, which could use an authoritative moderator.

Meanwhile, Ann Curry, another NBC colleague who suffered an awkward departure, lent Gregory support via Twitter. Quoting the Dalai Lama, she wrote: “@DavidGregory Hoping “in place of this turmoil come confidence,integrity+dignity, heroic qualities all human beings…aspire to.’-HHDL”

[From Page Six]

You know sh-t just got real when Ann Curry is all, “Whoa, man, only the Dalai Lama can help you.” And this incident really is comparable to the Ann Curry/Today debacle. And I’m saying that as someone who thinks Ann Curry was an absolutely terrible morning news anchor. I don’t think there’s any contradiction there – you can think Curry was a terrible anchor AND that she was mistreated by Today and NBC News. You can believe that David Gregory has the on-screen charisma of a dead ferret AND that he was mistreated by NBC News. Still, $4 million is quite a good way to walk away from a job.

Photos courtesy of Getty, WENN.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

87 Responses to “David Gregory ‘angry & humiliated’ by his ousting from ‘Meet the Press’”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. delphi says:

    Anyone following in Tim Russert’s footsteps was doomed from the outset. He was just that charasmatic, knowledgable, and a damn good “old school” journalist. I’ll reserve judgement, but I thinl Andrea Mitchell (and Jim Miclajewski) got shorted this platform. Both have been covering Capitol Hill for as long as I can remember, and have that same mentality as Russert.

    All the news drama!

    • Kaiser says:

      I watch Andrea Mitchell’s noon MSNBC show while I eat lunch and let me tell you, she’s a good reporter but she should not have her own show.

      • Really says:

        Agree, Andrea Mitchell is typically a well spoken guest, but she did not lead the discussions well this week. That one guy went off on a rant about blacks killing blacks and she could barely cut him off quick enough, it was uncomfortable to watch.
        Also agree with the dead ferret comparison. I watched faithfully with Tim Russert and he could never be replaced. At least Chuck Todd has more personality. But seriously NBC, this is no surprise. My husband called this months ago, chuck Todd is on there every week.

      • Francesca says:

        I was surprised at how poorly Andrea handled the discussion Sunday. Maybe the overwhelming awkwardness of Gregory’s firing threw her off her game?

    • Esmom says:

      I think any successor of Russert’s was doomed not just because of who Russert was but because the format is getting old and stale. I don’t think anyone will be able to attract more/younger viewers.

      • delorb says:

        I agree. They should be allowed to call ‘bull’ more often than they do. Too often they let their guests spew garbage that’s factually wrong. LOL It doesn’t mean you’re being partisan if you correct someone. In the name of wanting to look impartial, they’ve allowed the stretchers of the truth to get away with murder.

    • 30winks says:

      Tim Russert was the best. I miss him, and wonder what he would think about the state of politics today all the time. No one can ever replace him, he was one of a kind. I’m a DC native and loved that man.

      • Elizabeth says:

        I loved him too and haven’t watched MTP much at all since he died. Its turned into the same ole “If I talk loud enough over you, I win” show that is on every other station without him.

      • mayamae says:

        I loved Tim, too. I remember watching MSNBC that day. The way they honored him was amazing. All day, they sat and talked about him. It was beautiful.

        I haven’t watched MTP since then, but I love Chuck Todd, so I’ll probably start tuning in again.

      • Tiffany :) says:

        I loved him too. It makes me sad that I became a fan later in his career, I wish I had paid attention earlier.

    • JudyK says:

      Plus Tim Russert had an undeniable, humble “boy” type charm. I NEVER missed Meet the Press when he was the host and have never watched it since he died. I’m still not over his death.

    • Sunny says:

      I agree- anyone following Russert was doomed. He was terrific.

      I like Meet the Press and I tend to watch it every few weeks, a habit I picked up in college. In the ten years or so I have been watching I have noticed that the show has declined. I am not so sure that has anything to do with stale format but that the increasingly toxic, American political system impacting the quality of the show.

      More often than not, the comments on the show are hyper- partisan and discourse between both sides seems to have declined. Maybe Americans are just suffering political fatigue? Maybe they are getting their news in other places since the show now lacks candour and insight? Maybe we are all tired of Thomas Friedman’s glib comments at the roundtable or David Brook’s bullshit? That may have impacted ratings just as much as Gregory’s perceived lack of charisma.

      Chuck Todd has hosted a bunch of times already as guest host. Interested to see what he will do with the show.
      Sad how they ousted poor David though. NBC is really crap at managing this sort of situation.

      • Tiffany :) says:

        “the comments on the show are hyper- partisan and discourse between both sides seems to have declined”

        Sadly….I think that is just America now. We can’t have productive conversations about important issues because no one can agree on what the “facts” on any given issue are. It seems people agree on what the problems are, but completely disagree on how to fix them.

    • joan says:

      Even Tim Russert’s OWN SON can’t fill his shoes, so you know they were tough to fill.

      This IS a step in the right direction but I agree the format is stale and beyond help.

    • Bob Loblaw says:

      I like David Gregory but I felt he was mis-cast as Russert’s successor. I’m not sure Chuck Todd will fair any better. I don’t feel they are charismatic as interviewers.

  2. Kiddo says:

    He was fired for bad performance, and got a nice umbrella package. How many regular workers get to come back in and make a speech about being let go and saying goodbye? Exactly none. I realize that’s different, but at the same time, there was no cult of personality following behind Gregory. While it’s nice that Curry offered support, I simply can’t find a reason to cry in my cereal for him. It’s better to have a clean cut rather than the awkward interactions Curry had with Lauer after her canning, because that type of drama distracts viewers from the stories.

    Maybe I just don’t care for him, thus my laissez-faire attitude.

    • GoodNamesAllTaken says:

      I have to agree. My first husband’s company used to announce that tomorrow morning, everyone should be near the intercom at 8:30 because four (or five or ten) department sections would be closing and if yours was called, please pack up your desk and leave within 20 minutes. Don’t forget to leave us your pass card.

      He didn’t perform. He was replaced. It happens all the time and you don’t get 4 million dollars. I have compassion for anyone who loses their job. It rocks your confidence and your world. But a lot of people actually have to worry about where their rent is coming from when it happens.

      • PunkyMomma says:

        @GoodNames – same thing happened to PunkyDaddy. It was announced one month in advance, so all the staff spend the month totally distressed, wondering who was out. No parachute whatsoever. Four million dollars would have been wonderful, but even a token amount would have been a godsend.

      • GoodNamesAllTaken says:

        Isn’t that so cruel? I can’t believe they can get away with it, but they do.

    • TheOriginalKitten says:

      These are all excellent points but we’re talking about a network that makes what, 8 billion dollars a year? 4 mill is pennies to these people.

      If you follow Stern at all then you know that NBC has a rather tumultuous history of treating employees like disposable crap.

      That being said, David Gregory has the charisma of an old, wet rag and at the end of the day, NBC is still a corporation that must put profitability above hurt feelings.

      • Kiddo says:

        Yeah, I get your point, but still can’t muster up a tear even with a sliced onion. Maybe I’m cruel, but Gregory wasn’t great. He was a complete d*ck with Glenn Greenwald, asking if he was a criminal for reporting Snowden leaks, so I have other reasons for not appreciating his smugness. He questioned, essentially, whether Greenwald was acting as a journalist, while Gregory never broke any news stories himself.

        Not that I think his replacement will be better.

      • TheOriginalKitten says:

        I haven’t seen it but I’ve never been impressed with Gregory’s journalistic prowess so your description of the Greenwald interview doesn’t surprise me in the least.

      • delorb says:

        I can remember when he was hired. There were a LOT of people who said this was a bad idea. A LOT. So I’m not surprised.

  3. Anna says:

    Why does his face look so wet in that top picture? Does it always look that away?

  4. PunkyMomma says:

    I think when your own employer, in this case, NBC, orders up a psychological evaluation of you, you should probably fold your tent and leave. There’s more to this story than bad ratings. (Note that Chuck Todd scored even lower than Gregory.)

    http://pagesix.com/2014/04/21/david-gregory-undergoes-psychological-evaluation-to-combat-low-ratings/

    • Esmom says:

      The main takeaway I get from the article is the network was doing everything they could to help the ratings. I didn’t see anything to indicate anything more nefarious in relation to Gregory. I just think the format of a Sunday morning news show is dying, not much can be done about that.

      • PunkyMomma says:

        @Esmom I don’t understand the necessity in evaluating Gregory’s family. Nor do I understand replacing Gregory with another reporter who scored lower on the evaluation than Gregory.

        I agree that the Sunday morning news show is on the wane.

      • Esmom says:

        PM, My career has been in marketing so I guess that’s why that info — both bits of it — doesn’t surprise me a bit. Depresses me, yes, but doesn’t surprise me. I should add that I am looking to make a career switch.

      • PunkyMomma says:

        @Esmom. I wish you the very best in your career switch. ‘Hope you find something you love that pays you well.

      • mayamae says:

        He’s never appealed to me, but letting the info be leaked that they did “psychological testing”, is crossing the line. How many people look at the headline without reading the story? It sounds like he was unstable (the headline), and including his wife is bizarre. The problem is, he’s a capitol hill reporter. He didn’t need a personality for that, and making an issue of it is not going to make him more likeable. If anything, it makes a person more awkward.

        I don’t think he should be required to colour his hair if he doesn’t want to, but I don’t believe a woman his age would be allowed to “let herself go”.

      • Tiffany :) says:

        “letting the info be leaked that they did “psychological testing”, is crossing the line.”

        I completely agree! Can an employer legally release health information like that?

  5. jenn says:

    can’t stand chuck todd

    • Welldun says:

      Agreed. IMO both Gregory and Todd should be on Faux

      • Sharon Lea says:

        ITA – he never challenged guests and their answers, but simply allowed their talking points to be made. He and Todd are cut from the same cloth. Why did they allow talking heads week after week? There will be no change, what a disappointment.

        I don’t get the comments that anyone would fail because no one can be Tim Russert. Tim was great because he made a point to cross examine his guests and if they tried to deny something, he’d roll the tape of them saying it. Any successor should have known the expectations and followed suit. If you were hired to work on 60 Minutes, you would know that you must dig deep and be an investigative journalist, this show was no different.

  6. Cricket says:

    I think the audience Tim Russert drew was across party lines and he seemed to be a straight shooter who hid his bias. I’m not sure if it’s just our current jugular political gotcha climate where bias is shown like a badge of honor- on both sides that has changed this shows dynamic. And, not sure if Chuck Todd will bring anything new to that challenge but he does have a larger personality.

    If only they could find someone who doesn’t seem to show their bias, I think the show could return to the respect it once had.

    • PunkyMomma says:

      @Cricket – you make a great point. Regardless of your party affiliation, if you wanted to be taken as a serious candidate you had to survive Russert’s MTP interview. Tim was fierce, but fair.

    • Kori says:

      There was a poll of politicians & their handlers regarding the various talk shows around 1998 or so that said basically MTP was the premiere stop. It was the toughest, the fairest, the scariest and the one that your guy/gal HAD to go on if they wanted ANY credibility at all. And the words ‘let’s put that up on the screen’ were some of the scariest. TR was a real legend–he had the skills, the charisma , the toughness and the fairness. I am reading Mark Leibovich’s The Town which opens up with Russert’s funeral and it is fascinating how he was simultaneously loved, feared, admired, respected by almost all and disliked only a very few in a town that thrives on tearing people down.

      • Jayna says:

        So true. Reading your description of Tim and the show makes me mourn him all over again and takes me back to when we lost him and how sad I was. I loved MTP because of Tim.

    • Tiffany :) says:

      I think that is the hard thing about today’s political climate, though. People accuse even moderates of having a “bias” depending on where they get their statistics from.

      By citing even one story, study or fact, the news media will put you on one political team or another. For example, if a person talks about upgrading infrastructure that was built during the Eisenhower administration, they will be accused of having a liberal bias that just wants to reward unions, even if they simply believe that roads and bridges should be maintained.

      I think it would be easy to find a good journalist who doesn’t show their bias. I think it would be nearly impossible to find a good journalist that opposing sides would not accuse of having bias.

  7. itsnotthatserious says:

    Chuck is an arrogant egomaniac. His tenure won’t get them the ratings they are looking for.

    People are just not watching TV the way they used to, the talking heads are so ignorant and love the sound of their voices.

    • The Original Mia says:

      I didn’t even have to write a response! Here’s everything I wanted to say. Cannot stand Chick “Weasel” Todd.

  8. Talie says:

    I can’t feel bad for people who get $4 mil dollar pay-offs…

  9. Bored suburbanhousewife says:

    David Gregory, like (surprisingly) Brian Williams, is a very funny guy, very witty & both do amazing vocal impressions. He used to be great as a regular on Imus in the Morning back in the day. But his humor didn’t really translate into a serious moderator host format for a morning news talk show. Also he didn’t give off the same loveability aura as Russert. That’s just a gift. Also I don’t get the feeling people follow the network news shows anymore like they did in the past. Aren’t audience ratings falling generally in this area? don’t think Todd can do any better.

    • Anniefannie says:

      I loved the interaction between Imus and David Gregory during Imus’s heyday. They had a great chemistry. That said, can’t I can’t muster much sympathy for Gregory as he was the first to abandon Imus when he was caught in the racial firestorm that ruined him at MSNBC. While Imus might have deserved his eventual ousting , it was clear David quickly chose career expediency over loyalty…he’s now probably experiencing his own dose.

      • mayamae says:

        I don’t blame David for that. Imus didn’t use an inappropriate word, or just have his words twisted. He called black female basketball players – “nappy headed hos”.

      • Anniefannie says:

        No , actually his colleague said it and Imus laughed. While it was an offensive boneheaded thing to do its these times when you look to your friends colleagues for help. Gregory could have easily said Imus was clearly in the wrong but let’s not overlook the good things he’s done….or something of that nature. Instead he quickly distanced himself as that was the more expedient, safe route career wise.
        Its rumored that he’s a major climber a** ki**er and this just confirmed it for me.

  10. Tiffany says:

    I know that when Russert passed, I stopped watching MTP. Even the election result shows were not the same this pass season. Like what was stated above, who took over was doomed from the start. I was on the Holt bandwagon when they were doing the selection and was not only shocked that it was Gregory but that his lasted as long as he did.

  11. eliza says:

    NBC treats their journalists like #@$!. Look how they handled Ann Curry’s firing from Today?! Unless you are Matt Lauer or Brian Williams, your time at NBC will be crappy.

    • TheOriginalKitten says:

      NBC treats every employee who isn’t bringing in the viewers like garbage.

      • JudyK says:

        As they should. They are paid millions and if they can’t do the job, they need to leave. However, I do agree w/ Kaiser about the manner of their leaving…both David Gregory and Ann Curry were AWFUL and they both needed to go…but with some dignity, not with a public kick in the butt.

      • TheOriginalKitten says:

        No it’s not about the fact that they’re not doing their job, it’s about how they’re treated when it’s time for them to go. But really, most big corps are assholes so nothing new here.

  12. Tracy says:

    I gave it a shot when Gregory took over but it did not hold my interest long. It will not be any better (may actually be worse) with Chuck Todd. Either way, I won’t be watching.

  13. Evie says:

    I have not been able to stomach David Gregory since I watched him put on a disgusting display during a spot on the Today show a few years ago. Cameron Diaz was on and she was demonstrating a golf swing for some reason. He sidled up behind her and was fawning all over her. It was gross and just felt unseemly for him to do that. Add to that the fact he is married and I was even more put off by it. I haven’t thought kindly of him since. All I kept thinking during the segment was how much I wished she would turn around and ask him what the hell he thought he was doing!!!

  14. Sam says:

    MTP is supposed to be “serious” political journalism. But it’s at the core, I think, supposed to be about the intervew subjects, not the interviewer. The interviewer is supposed to take the place of the viewer, ideally. Tim Russert did that – he asked the stuff that he knew the viewers were thinking, but his questions were genuine. Gregory was one of those, my husband calls them “gotcha” journalists. They’re not really interested in having a conversation or drawing out ideas. They just want to try to trip up the subjects. Which can sometimes be fair – Russert called out contradictions when he saw them. But Gregory did it so much you came away feeling bad for most of the interviewees – even when they didn’t deserve it!

  15. PixieWitch says:

    he looks like he’s made out of wax.

  16. Tig says:

    Agree this format is going the way of the dinosaur- so don’t know if any moderator can reverse that trend. If you want to see folks scream at each other, watch Fox News. The folks that watch Fox, watch Fox. No one else wants to see the scream-fests on other networks.

  17. FingerBinger says:

    NBC should get Rachel Maddow to host MTP. She’s intelligent, articulate and she knows what she’s talking about. Rachel, Melissa Harris Perry, Joy Reid, and Chris Hayes are probably the best pundits at NBC/MSNBC.

    • cat says:

      Rachel Maddow would be really good actually!!

    • Kori says:

      Rachel Maddow will be great. I think the others are a little too biased. RM is obviously liberal but she does great with conservatives. (Well Rand Paul may disagree LOL) I remember she had former Gov Tom Ridge (former head of Homeland Security) on and they had a great, tough talk about the color-coded threat levels and other issues. She was hard but fair and he said at the end that he wished all interviews between people of opposing viewpoints could go that way. And she is smart as hell. People who disagree with her may reflexively think she wouldn’t be hard on liberals or too hard on conservatives but they should take a look at the Ridge interview.

      • mayamae says:

        I love Rachel. She manages to be passionate without being emotional – which is very hard. She’s never nasty, rarely sarcastic, and doesn’t use her intelligence to intimidate people.

      • bridget says:

        I loathe Rachel maddow- I think she is entirely one sided and actually, extremely sarcastic- that’s pretty much what she does. The news is no longer partial, they get way too involved and choose what to cover. I still am waiting to hear what happened to the IRS emails??

      • mayamae says:

        @bridget, do you mean that the news is no longer impartial? I would agree if that’s what you meant. You really have to follow several sources to get a good grasp on issues. I see where you consider Rachel as sarcastic. I see her more tongue-in-cheek, which is a much more tolerable version of sarcasm (in my book).

    • Bob Loblaw says:

      I would watch if they gave it to Rachel, so would my mother, she adores Rachel. Unfortunately, we all know the network would never have the balls to cast her.

  18. Thaisajs says:

    Chuck Todd is a great choice and I have high hopes that he’ll return MTP to its politically-focused roots. It got too Today Show-ish for me under David Gregory. The Sunday morning shows have always been terrifically boring about 99% of the time but at least under Russert you knew someone was gonna get grilled. And that could be fun to watch. David Gregory was just too lightweight and too argumentative with no obvious result at the end of the hour.

  19. cat says:

    Tim Russert had a ton of personality and likeability but that being said it doesn’t mean that someone who followed him was ‘doomed to fail.’ I don’t have a tv and only watched it maybe once after Gregory but it was clear that he needed a bit more oomph for that gig. Six years is a long time tho!

    That being said, Kaiser, this line made me laugh out loud and laugh in a way that I realized I don’t laugh enough:

    “You know sh-t just got real when Ann Curry is all, ‘Whoa, man, only the Dalai Lama can help you.’”

    Ha! Perfectly said and so funny! I do feel badly that he didn’t get to say an on-air goodbye, etc. People made good points about being fired for poor performance you don’t always get to say goodbye (tho’ usually you do in some way even if it’s quick) — but this is such a public sphere that it makes it harder to keep face, even tho’ that ship sailed anyway.

  20. Nancy says:

    Tim Russert was a legend. Loved him. Hard act to follow. It’s like the rebound boyfriend. Never lasts.

  21. NessaB says:

    You’re not allowed to use the word cachet in a sentence if you don’t know how to spell it. 🙂

  22. Jayna says:

    I miss Tim Russert. Irreplaceable. But Gregory was always the wrong choice to follow in his footsteps.

  23. Kate2 says:

    I’m glad I’m not the only one who thought Curry sucked. I was so glad when she got booted.

  24. Ally says:

    There’s a bit of sanctified-by-death amnesia going on here. At the time of his passing, Tim Russert had been heavily criticized and derided for letting members of the Bush administration come on his show and put forward their pro-Iraq war talking points unquestioned, besides being a pro-war cheerleader from the safety of his studio himself. Prior to that distinction, he spent years pushing the Lewinsky story like there was nothing more important going on.

    Gregory was no better. It’s just that the change in talking head highlighted how past its prime the format is. NBC wants a show that will put it in the headlines on the Sunday night news shows and the Monday morning print editions, but without ever wanting to challenge the crusty and the powerful (e.g. John McCain who’s been wrong about everything for 20 years but is still one of the most frequent guests on MTP. Also, let’s mention the grotesque gender imbalance in the guests.). No one under 60 is interested in watching that week after week in the digital age.

  25. Maria of MD says:

    Never watched Meet the Press. I work Sundays anyway. But I do miss Keith Olbermann’s show on MSNBC. His show paved the way for Maddow and so many others who are on that network now.

  26. jane16 says:

    NBC is a horrible company and treat all their employees like dirt. I have a relative who is a vp there and has been for years, and a couple of nephews and cousins who work in various depts at the Burbank studio. So, I feel sorry for David Gregory, and don’t blame him at all for the lowered ratings for the tedious MTP, which I think was wrecked partly by the blowhard, melodramatic Tim Russert, and partly just because its time was up.

    I don’t get all the praise for Russert. He was an arrogant gasbag that was constantly trying to make the show about himself instead of whatever the news issues were. Worst of all, when Hillary Clinton made her historic run for the presidency in 2007-2008, Russert proved himself to be a total misogynist, slamming her and misrepresenting her whenever possible. I believe that MTP lost a LOT of women viewers during that period; my friends & I wrote a lot of angry letters to nbc & msnbc during that primary run.

  27. Jeanne says:

    I’m surprised by the number of people that feel that the Sunday morning news show format is dead. I love watching George Stephanopolous’ show on ABC on Sundays. It’s the one hour a week that my husband and I ban our children from bothering us so we can have some adult time.