Benedict Cumberbatch covers Out Mag, talks bullies, sexual experimentation

bendy out

Before you even read Benedict Cumberbatch’s Out Magazine interview, I’m going to need all of the ride-or-die Cumberbitches to check out Out Mag’s excellent 15-photo slideshow of our lovely otter – go here to see. Aren’t those photos lovely? The close-ups especially. And people are saying that the sad, ripped up sweater is actually from Benedict’s closet. Does this boy own any decent, non-torn casual clothing? I need to take an otter shopping. Anyway, as for the Out profile… it’s a whole lotta Bendy. Since it’s Out Mag, there’s a lot of discussion about Alan Turing’s sexuality and about Bendy’s all-boys’ boarding school days. You can read the piece here. Some highlights:

Alan Turing’s posthumous royal pardon: “It’s an insult for anybody of authority or standing to sign off on him with their approval and say, ‘Oh, he’s forgiven.’ The only person who should be [doing the] forgiving is Turing, and he can’t because we killed him. And it makes me really angry. It makes me very angry.”

The Imitation Game as a parable for intolerance: “It’s not a history lesson — it’s a warning that this could very easily happen again. People are being beheaded in countries right now because of their beliefs or sexual orientations. It’s terrifying. It’s medieval — a beheading! I’d take up arms against someone who was telling me I had to believe in what they believed or they would kill me. I would fight them. I would fight them to the death. And, I believe, the older you get, you have to have an idea of what’s right or wrong. You can’t have unilateral tolerance. You have to have a point where you go, ‘Well, religious fundamentalism is wrong.’ ”

Sherlock and slash/fan fiction: “People keep coming up to me and saying, ‘Oh, he’s so sexy, do you think [Sherlock would be] interested in me?’ Do you not think he’d just look at you twice and tell you everything you hate about yourself and crumple you up like a little bit of paper and flick you away? He’s a machine and brutal and ruthless and has no time for the distractions of your fawning. Because, you know, they either want to make John [Watson] into a sort of cute little toy, or me into a cute toy, or we’re f–king in space on a bed, chained together.”

He loved boarding school: “Because you have that complete experience of being a child. You are not going to and from a place all the time, and I was very, very hungry for company. My mom and dad, poor them — I used to ask every Christmas and birthday for a brother or sister. That’s all I really wanted when I was growing up, because I was an only child.”

Same-sex experimentation: “While there was experimentation [at Brambletye], it had never occurred to me as ‘Oh, this is that.’ It was just boys and their penises, the same way with girls and vaginas and boobs. It wasn’t out of a desire.”

Fame: “The work motivates me most, not the byproducts. By and large, I ignore them.”

[From Out Magazine]

There’s so much more. He tells a story about how Harrow (his posh boarding school) was not very gay-friendly and when two boys were “outed,” they were bullied by other students and the young Bendy told off the bullies. He also talks about how he hates being surrounded by guards because “then it just becomes an extension of you” and you get blamed for guards getting aggressive with innocent fans. It’s a good piece!

Oh, and I know you guys want the Flaunt stuff, but I’m still waiting for Flaunt to officially release their cover story and stuff. We’ll probably have it later this week.

bendy3

bendy2

Photos courtesy of Out Magazine.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

227 Responses to “Benedict Cumberbatch covers Out Mag, talks bullies, sexual experimentation”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Kiddo says:

    He’s back to the Conan ocean wave curl here; do not like. Maybe a bobcat resides in his closet. Talking about closets in Out Magazine seems contradictory, though.

    • mimif says:

      I have a bobcat in my closet, does that make me heteronormative or not?

      • Lflips says:

        What does it mean to have a “bobcat” in your closet? I’ve never heard that term before.

      • Kiddo says:

        hahaha.

      • mimif says:

        @Lflips, I’ve got a Pixiebob, he’s a fake bobcat. I don’t actually have a closet tho, because I live in a yurt and am a known liar. Like Judi Dench, who btw, totally despises Benedict Cumbercurl.

      • Sixer says:

        I have a spider in my closet. This means I can’t get any clean clothes from it until Mr Sixer (spider exterminator extraordinaire) gets home and murderises it to the deathly hallows of spider hell. I am thus wearing yesterday’s clothes, which are stained by a cooking splash from yesterday’s dinner.

        (This, I promise you, is entirely true. I can’t believe somebody mentioned creatures in closets today!)

      • Lindy79 says:

        Oh god.
        I found this monster in our bath the other day, even the cats wouldn’t touch it.
        Mr Lindy picked it up and brought it outside. I was more of the opinion that we should set it on fire and shoot it out the window but he said I was being ridiculous…..as if.

      • Sixer says:

        My mother used to insist that if you spray the entire house with cat/dog flea treatment once a year, you will inhibit the number of spiders you get. But it didn’t save me this morning! I’m still shuddering and I’m not going into my bedroom Until It Is Dead And I Have Seen The Body.

      • MissMary says:

        I’m terrified of spiders. Like legit, panic-mode, terrified. Peppermint oil works well to keep most of them at bay, except black widows.

      • kri says:

        tell your bobcat he does NOT have to closeted!! He should be out and pround, and hunting Cisco Adler.

      • mimif says:

        Lol kri, my bobcat be hunting spiders up in dem dangly bits. 😀

      • icerose says:

        @Sixer my cousin believes that having cobwebs in your house is beneficial as they trap other flies and insects, Mind you her cottage does remind me of Miss Havisham’s living room.

  2. AG-UK says:

    The cover seems like his go to face for magazines.. the one in Navy is v nice.

  3. Lindy79 says:

    The Flaunt article is apparently very PR friendly and a bit dull from what I’ve read so I’d prefer this one.
    IMHO sense he’s going to get some backlash from some areas for saying stuff about fanfiction and maybe the fan photo thing (even though I agree with him). That and I think some people are already a bit off about the cloak and dagger way they appear to be handling the relationship thing.

    These pictures are awesome, I really like them.

    • Nic says:

      Doesn’t scream relationship to me in any way, but hey, what do I know.
      The interview was…odd. I think it was just the choice of words. I’m the first to admit I’d go crazy if I was approached all the time but he needs to rein in the huffing to journos.

      • Kazlock 1307 says:

        Please Lord don’t let it be a relationship!!
        Miss Stickupherarse look’s more into herself than BC!!
        Pretentious to a new level!

      • gg says:

        Elle magazine has a cover story coming out about him at the end of the month and they keep saying it is his “most revealing” interview yet. Of course it could be hype but I am wondering if it could be the Sophie reveal…

      • allons-y alonso says:

        Elle always say their celeb stories will be the ‘most revealing interview ever.’ I doubt it will be anything ground breaking. The man obviously wants his private life private and that’s more than understandable. A supposed/rumored GF reveal in a magazine would defeat the purpose of protecting that privacy; not to mention disappointing.

      • Megan says:

        Agreed about the complaining Nic. He needs to pull his big boy pants to the press and just deal with it. Otherwise it is going to be a long four-5 months for him.

      • MissMary says:

        ELle is just trying to pull in readers. As mentioned, they did the same with TH’s story and it was bupkis. Typically, the “big reveal” for this sort of story is “I cried when I watched Sound of Music” or “No, I really love cooking! Honest!” something soft-pedaled and fluff. “Humanizing” and “awwwwww, look, he’s like real people!” type b.s. If there was a “Sophie reveal” it wouldn’t be via an Elle interview from a month or more ago just now being pub’d.

      • M.A.F. says:

        Ahhh, people have already mentioned the ELLE interview with the other Brit boy. carry on.

    • Lindy79 says:

      By relationship I mean anything really. She’s fairly new to being seen with him a lot (unlike say Adam or even other ladies in the group) so it’s safe to assume that whatever is going on, she’s spending some more time with him than in the past, what I meant was that the behaviour has changed.

      • Ellen says:

        I don’t actually mind Sophie. She seems nice enough.
        Here we go again with the ELLE exclusive which would probably be a trailer to his new film or competition . The whole article would sound like an over enthusiastic fangirl wrote it and would be cringing. For an example see an HIddles interviews.
        Honestly don’t know why some fans believe what’s in that magazine.

      • Encumbered says:

        Ah…just a highland fling it is.

      • Nic says:

        I’ve no idea if sophie is nice or not. Never seen her interviewed, met her and don’t know anything about her to comment either way. But I do know I’m sick of seeing her name, that much is true,.
        As for Elle, their fan baiting is pathetic. I know it’s not exactly a highbrow mag, but the tweets and the gushing, ..ergh.

      • Lindy79 says:

        I’m the same, I don’t have any feelings about her beyond she seems a little art for arts sake with no substance, but I know very little about her.
        I’m more talking about the handling of whatever the situation is by him and his people.

        If you want to keep it private then it was possible for her to be at the gala but not walk red carpet and leave via the front entrance of the hotel, Instead she was there, around him but never with him, it’s odd and not in line with keeping it private, nor is going to the french open only to act like robots who barely know each other and are bored shitless by the actual tennis. If you want to be at these things together then do it, at least act like friends.
        There are many, many actors who have partners that stay well out of the limelight and do it successfully but don’t act ridiculously.

        Carrying on like this has only increased the interest with his more zealous fans, who have made it their prime focus to out them as whatever they are.
        She’d be analysed either way, but it could have been controlled a lot better.

        I guess I figured he was above all that, if he’s with someone then he wouldn’t give a shit what people think and wouldn’t alter his behaviour.

      • An says:

        Don’t know if they’re dating, but my likely worthless two cents’ is that she would be the person who doesn’t want to be all over the place yet. If he cared, she’d not be seen at all.

    • Breezy says:

      This one reads a bit like the interviewer took some liberties imo. Dude rambles so it doesn’t surprise me but that can come off badly too. Doesn’t sound like him all the time though.

      That said, tumblr fans are having monster sized tantrums over him not adoring their fanfiction. I’m so done with that part of the fandom. Good lord. More important things to think about than if Ben wants to read about being screwed by watson.

  4. Birdie says:

    BendyDick-Cum-on-my-Babs

  5. GoodNamesAllTaken says:

    Ok, I know I’m dense about certain things and sometimes miss the boat, but what was he trying to say about same sex experimentation? That he didn’t think it meant you were gay? It’s just that you had a penis? Wha? I mean, I don’t think it means necessarily that you’re gay, either, but I just don’t understand his point.

    Love him, but that sweater looks like he tore it on purpose. Silly.

    • Kaiser says:

      I really think he’s saying he’s experimented with other boys (while at boarding school) but it didn’t mean anything. Like, he played “I’ll show you mine if you show me yours” and maybe they kissed a little.

    • MissMary says:

      Most kids experiment with their bodies, even at a young age, figuring out “Oh, yours does that too?” or “Hey, this is weird/cool/different” and it doesn’t mean their raving sex maniacs or even ready for “real sex”… I think he’s referring to that ‘phase’ kids go through, and his just happened to be with other guys in a boarding school.

      • PunkyMomma says:

        We used to call it playing doctor.

      • MissMary says:

        This. Back in the dark ages, when I was a kid, no one freaked out about it, but I think now a lot of parents are nervous when kids go through that phase. My kid hasn’t hit that phase yet so I don’t know if I’ll be a nervous one or not lol

      • GoodNamesAllTaken says:

        Got it, thanks. Sorry to be dense.

      • Felice says:

        I mean I think it depends on the family. I mean I’m sure there’s some people who get that kids are curious but they just can’t do it in a public place or at the dinner table lol.

      • Old Enough says:

        also, they need a fact checker. Brambletye was mixed gender, although the boarding houses were probably segregated by gender.

      • LadySlippers says:

        •Old Enough•

        Brambletye is mixed gender now but that wasn’t the case back when he attended.

        ETA: It became co-ed in 1999.

    • LAK says:

      GNAT/Kaiser: sexual experimentation in boarding school is rife and a cliché at this point. It’s something about being locked up during formative years with no proper outlet whilst undergoing puberty and learning about sex and the opposite gender from whom you are excluded. You develop pashes and or practise stuff on each other like kissing or light touching, but it has no bearing on eventual sexual orientation. You are all curious and curiously innocent. Lots of sexual discussions amongst the student body, and no actual full out action. It’s always people in the same year and house who suddenly start experimenting rarely cross-years or houses.

      It’s sort of accepted that it will happen if you go to boarding school and most teachers turn a blind eye to it.

      Personally I think it is harder to come out as gay because most of your circle will probably think you are merely having an extended experimentation phase.

    • anon says:

      Am I the only one who took that penis comment to mean masturbation?

  6. magpie says:

    Not a cumberb*, but I like him more and more…

  7. Mel M says:

    Really enjoyed this.

  8. Hello Kitty says:

    Think we can start a grassroots campaign for Cumby to host SNL when his movie opens? I think he’d be good. The best hosts are entertainers (e.g. Timberlake). And Cumby would probably be down for doing a British Monarchy sketch.

    • mimif says:

      Did you know Hello Kitty isn’t really a cat? Honest question. Jaderu told me that and I cried in my Cheerios for a week.

      • Hello Kitty says:

        Don’t cry, Mimif! Kotaku got to the bottom of it!
        http://kotaku.com/dont-be-silly-hello-kitty-is-a-cat-1627820750

      • LadySlippers says:

        •minif•

        I lived in Japan and I never saw or heard that Hello Kitty wasn’t a cat. Seriously. They have theme parks, bathroom and car accessories (think toys for adults as children are too busy with school stuff to get frivolous toys), and stores dedicated to HK. And the Japanese love cats (and dogs). Cat petting rooms are a thing there (again, not joking).

        Obviously I could be wrong but don’t think I am. Hopefully that makes you feel a bit better.

    • Amberica says:

      I haven’t watched SNL unless Timberlake is on in probably 10 years. I would do anything to make this genius idea a reality. I have no power, but I will be obsessed with this until it happens now. Damn you for putting it in my head!!! And, also, thanks for putting it there. 🙂

  9. 'P'enny says:

    hilarious! thank god for some old fashioned honest reporting. Wish his actor-friend ‘who shall not be named’ take a leaf out of his book here and be a bit more frank and less diplomatic.

    I love these photos, he’s stealing my heart Hiddlesbum, I’m going to the other side.

    lol – nah.

    but, I do love a man in a good woolly jumper – its just so cuddable.

    • icerose says:

      P’enny do not forget that he who cannot be mentioned did an advert which was broadcast on UK TV alerting people to what has been happening to gay people in Uganda and other countries at least ” years ago?. I would say that was telling it like it was and putting your feelings into action. I am sure the fact that his agency is owned by two gay men and Luke is gay played a part in it but good on him anyway to support his friends.
      “Sometimes the most powerful stories are the ones that are not made up”
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r0Czs8dpBlQ

      • allheavens says:

        @icerose

        We know you love Hiddleston but please can you give it a rest?

        These two men are not running for prom queen.

      • linkle says:

        It wasn’t an advert it was a trailer promoting documentaries on the BBC. The documentary was called The World’s Worst Place To Be Gay presented by Scott Mills. A few other actors did the same. Hiddleston had nothing to do with it’s production and was probably just randomly assigned that particular one.

      • icerose says:

        the comment was directed at P’enny as she brought him up and I was not sure if she new of his involvement. It was not as you seem to think a competitive post. But yes the advert was for a TV show and appeared on UK television at the time but just because others were involved and he was asked to do a specific clip does not negate his involvement and commitment.

      • delorb says:

        @ice,

        “he was asked to do a specific clip does not negate his involvement and commitment.”

        It shouldn’t inflate his involvement and commitment either. Also, Penny never said anything about Tom being involved or not involved in gay rights. Her comment was specific to her wanting Tom to be “less diplomatic and more frank”.

      • Lilacflowers says:

        @delorb, if he didn’t want to demonstrate involvement or commitment, he could have said “No, please give me another clip”, it isn’t as if BBC News has a shortage of product. And a person can be diplomatic AND frank at the same time. It is a skill, which good diplomats exercise all the time.

      • delorb says:

        @lilac,

        The CLIP had nothing to do with this conversation. This particular conversation is about one fan hoping that Tom would do something similar with regard to his WORDS in various INTERVIEWS. It had nothing to do with gay people in Uganda, who did it first or the BBC. Why bring it up, unless one is compelled to constantly compare them? I also never said that a person CAN’T be diplomatic AND frank, so your comment is a puzzle.

      • 'P'enny says:

        thanks for the info icerose, I didn’t know and it’s interesting to read and note. 😀

      • Lilacflowers says:

        @delorb, following your line of reasoning, you would not have brought up Bora Bora elsewhere on the thread.

      • delorb says:

        @lilac,

        So you DID know about that gossip. Jeez. I think that the topic that lead to the Bora Bora comment was about how Tom is now keeping fans at arms length because they tend to go over the top. As evidence of that, I mentioned the Bora Bora trip/vacation that got an over the top reaction from some. See how that works.? I could just as easily have mentioned how some fans staked out the set where he was filming. As a matter of fact, I think I did.

      • Lilacflowers says:

        @Delorb, wrong! I knew he went on vacation. I knew nothing of the gossip you then attached to it. Huge leap off a cliff there for you. And he dialed back on Twitter after SDCC and limited fan interactions during the Coriolanus run LAST YEAR, long before he went on vacation.

      • icerose says:

        @Delorb being frank can also mean supporting programmes which raise issues you believe in and then when asked saying that you support different lifestyles which he has done. Every one has a a different style and where as some prefer big publicity provoking statements others prefer amore diplomatic approach. And we are all entitled to comment on interviews and howwe perceive what is said. Equally we are all allowed to provide a counter argument. Attributing motives is purely about personal perception on internet sites. I f you had read my comments on previous pages I have actually said it is pointless because it is pretty much about perception and you can twist the events to come out anyway you like.
        Assuming that I made the comment as an comparison was erroneous .P’enny said she woud like it if Tom was more frank in interviews and I pit it forward as an example.

    • delorb says:

      Ice its not a competition. No reason to bring up the other guy, just to show that he did it first or second or all the time. Jeez.

  10. Chicagogurl says:

    God he looks good here. The Indiana jones hat had me chuckle for a second because of how cheeseball it is with the palm tree. He gives such great quotes. Back to my crush status.

  11. grabbyhands says:

    It’s actually very refreshing to see him be brutally honest about the more extreme parts of the Sherlock fandom.

    • lower-case deb says:

      is it as extreme as the Harry Styles fandom?
      my kids assure me that those comments were more likely made in all seriousness (i.e. no joke)
      http://www.buzzfeed.com/mjs538/terrifying-teens?s=mobile

      i used to think i was quite the rabid fan. but even me at my rabiest couldn’t do that…

      • grabbyhands says:

        Most people are cool- we all gather here, ooh and ahh over the Batch, his Cumbercurls, his pretty otter face etc. I have been known to refer to him as my imaginary boyfriend. But unfortunately a more vocal segment (I refer to them as the Tumble crazies) don’t seem to understand that he is NOT Sherlock( and that Sherlock wouldn’t be a nice person if he was real).

  12. TaterSkank says:

    I’m herding otterwings. They’re all running around like otterwings with their otterwings cut off. *peep peep peep peep* It’s maddening.
    I want to do weird science experiments on this guy.

    • mimif says:

      Like Petri dish experiments? Please tell me they don’t involve a turkey baster because I’m not sure how I feel about a Cumbertato. Like, would it have curls? Omg Curly Cumberfries!

      • TaterSkank says:

        No taters involved. I save all my spuds for Mr. Tatum.
        My Cumber-experiments involve lots and lots of shining armor and Pam cooking spray.
        Don’t ask.
        Just walk away.
        *peep peep peep peep*

  13. Marcy says:

    His hands…jeez. I was reminded of hand-model David Duchovny in “Zoolander”; that was a howl. Ben could do the hand model thing. Those things are lethal on the eyes.

    • MissMary says:

      Some interview about a year ago, the interviewer mentioned BC knowing “the ladies” liked seeing his hands so always wanted to try and get at least one shot where they were very visible.

      • Marcy says:

        So he is aware of his effect/affect (I have a time figuring out which one–I’ve not had coffee yet, so I’ll leave them both here…) on his fans? I got the impression he didn’t engage with anything social media-y so he was oblivious. I heard interview last week where he had no idea the media swarm about him not being able to say “penguins”. I was like Dude!–how did you not know about that? LOL

      • MissMary says:

        He made a comment about wearing the white t-shirt in the ALS ice bucket challenge because fans were asking if he would, he made the hands comment, as well as made some other comments that show he’s aware. Even if he’s not reading it himself, someone on his ‘team’ is keeping him apprised.

  14. MissMary says:

    So, if he *does* “ignore he byproducts” of the work…why does he go to all these awards shindigs and parties and events? Yeah, I’m being bitchy this morning but it just rankles me when actors say things like that then demonstrably do give a damn about the “byproducts”. Unless he was referring to fans and celebrity…in which case I cycle back around to “then why trade on it for fancy clothes, prime concert/event seats, parties, etc”? Those are definitely byproducts of “the work”–if he was a jobbing actor, still on shows like Fortysomething or Miss Marple, you can bet your sweet bippy the “byproducts” wouldn’t be things like he’s getting now. If he truly “didn’t care” then we wouldn’t see him in nearly as many events and all. I don’t know if the answer in print is the same that he gave IRL to the interviewer or if it was edited/reframed and came off like that but IDK… it rankled me.

    • Felice says:

      I really do think it was worded weirdly. The reporter was asking negative questions to steer him in that direction. This interview took place before TIFF and LFF where he was very gracious to sign for as many as possible. I’m sure he cares about them as a whole but just thinks some of them need to settle down.

    • Lindy79 says:

      I agree. He spent the first half of the year going to many, many non-work related events and getting photographed doing it. His celebrity has afforded him a lot of perks and no harm in taking advantage of that but don’t act like you’re above it when it doesn’t suit.
      (I also agree that he’s more aware of social media than he lets on, probably through his team but he lets it slip every now and then.)

    • MissMary says:

      I’m just in a bitchy mood this morning it seems… I do think y’all are right, when i go back and re-read the whole interview. It seems very loaded towards the negative in terms of the reporter’s questions, and we all know BC isn’t a Disney Prince so his natural snark came through. Maybe I need more coffee before I Read these things lol.

      • Tara says:

        Nah, MissMary, I kind of scoffed at that part, too. The first thing I thought was, ‘hmm, all expenses paid, first class travel to Australia for that Con, Malaysia and Monaco Grand Prix all access tickets for him and guests, and whatever else he gets’.

        I think he’s taking in all the byproducts he can get. Lol.. Can’t say I blame him, but it would be decent to say something about being appreciative of the perks/freebies/opportunities he’s afforded and not dismiss them as byproducts he’s not intereseted in.

        And he probably has, but it doesn’t come off here.

      • Green Eyes says:

        I think Lord Bendy needs to read the Bill Murray article. STAT.

      • Lindy79 says:

        Green Eyes I was just laughing at the timing of that article! haha

      • delorb says:

        That’s the first thing that came to my mind as well.

  15. Cee says:

    I like this inverview very, very much, especially his comments on Turing and overall intolerance. However, I think I need some cultural translation regarding his comments on being an only child. This is not the first time he’s said this and I wonder why. Doesn’t he have an older half-sister? Does he consider himself to be an only child because his sister might not have lived with him? I find this strange, especially considering his sister’s comments about him being very smart and needing a woman to keep up with him (this comment always grates me). Since I hardly know anything about him besides his filmography and name, I thought I might ask all of you 🙂

    • MissMary says:

      His half sister was either in or nearly in unii by the time he was born, so he was raised essentially as an only child. And re the sister’s comments–I think that needs to be taken with a huge dose of salt b/c they came from a tabloid and who knows how they were gotten, whether she made them off hand, thinking she was talking to a friend, or taken way out of context.

      • Cee says:

        Yeah, you make a valid point. However, that’s how I even knew he had a sister lol
        Being related to someone famous must be unconfortable, never knowing if whatever you say (or let slip) will make it to a tabloid or blog, and how it might be reflected on your sibling/child/etc.

    • Lucrezia says:

      Technically he’s not an only child, but she’s a good deal older than him (18 years or something?). IMO, if you’re not both children at the same time, then thinking of yourself as an “only child” makes perfect sense.

      Heck, I feel like an only child and my half-brother is only 10 years older than me. That was enough of an age difference that we never did any traditional “sibling stuff” like play together or fight over things.

      • Cee says:

        I thought it might be something like that! Although most of my friends with older half-siblings don’t make that distinction (might have something to do with our country’s culture, though)

  16. Chris2 says:

    Very impressed by his palpable anger re Turing, and also about wishy washy attitudes to fundamentalism…..it’s still quite the thing to spout some kind of theoretical toleration of extremism simply because a person’s religion may not be criticised at all. Good for him….we are well past the point of that kind of politesse, and anger is more appropriate now than sheepishness.

    • Lindy79 says:

      I know it’s off point and not about religious fundamentalism but his line about Khan always bothered me when he’d say
      “one mans terrorist is another mans freedom fighter” as a defense for why Khan did what he did in the movie.
      I was always sorry no one challenged him on how dangerous a statement that is. Lets be honest whether you agree with them or not, that’s what fundamentalists and terrorists do, they use violence and terror to achieve their goals, they believe in what they are doing and believe they are righteous and true whether right or wrong in others eyes.

      Sorry I know that is a whole other argument but it leans back a bit and reminded me of my feelings any time he said that in an interview.
      I do agree with what he says here but it just doesn’t tie in with what he was saying when discussing his character.

      • delorb says:

        That statement shouldn’t have been challenged because its true. When terrorists are recruiting, they play up the fact that their ‘fighters’ will be heroes fighting for Islam. A reminder of this is that the entire world didn’t cry on 9-11. Some people in some countries cheered. In their eyes, those guys were heroes. Same goes for suicide bombers the world over. Their victims see them as terrorists, meanwhile there is probably a heroes shrine in their honor at home.

        My issue is that he thinks groups like ISIS can be reasoned with. That if we just sat down and talked to them…. That, IMO, shows a good amount of naivete on his part.

      • 'P'enny says:

        I don’t think that he believes ISIS can be reasoned with, I am not sure if I’ve missed that sentence somewhere? I do remember him referring to, that bombing isn’t the answer. And, I agree, in most cases, it achieves nothing but destroying well-needed infrastructure, it takes out a lot of innocent people, because they hide in social areas and domestic buildings and for years to come an expensive clean up mess, a lot of angry grief stricken people and its a lazy form of war-fare.

      • delorb says:

        @Penny,

        It was in a previous interview.

      • Lilacflowers says:

        @delorb, that statement should be challenged because, since you bring up 911, once upon a time, when our federal tax dollars were being sent his way, Osama Bin Laden was Ronald Reagan’s idea of a freedom fighter.

      • 'P'enny says:

        Okay, I was perturbed by delorb saying that Benedict had inferred that we should try and reason with ISIS.

        For everyone, I think should reread the interview, if in doubt, because he doesn’t say that at all., he says the first step is to try and understand them. I think there is a big difference between reasoning and understanding.

        http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/benedict-cumberbatch-on-tackling-terrifying-isis-you-cant-kill-an-idea-with-bombs-9722073.html

      • delorb says:

        @lilac,

        You just just agreed with me.

        “one mans terrorist is another mans freedom fighter”

        “Osama Bin Laden was Ronald Reagan’s idea of a freedom fighter. ”

        When Osama was fighting FOR us he was a freedom fighter. When he started fighting AGAINST us he was a terrorist. Jeez.

        @Penny,

        It wasn’t that interview. It was the one where he talked about allowing them into the country. Either way, trying to understand them so that you can reason with them is in the same vein. I don’t think one should try to reason with anyone who says they’d like nothing better than to see you dead. But hey, that’s just me.

      • Lilacflowers says:

        @delorb, OBL NEVER fought for us.

  17. Violet says:

    His mother has children from a previous relatiomship. Why does he say he is an only child?

    • MissMary says:

      His older sister is MUCH older and he was raised basically as an only child since she was in or almost in uni by the time he was born. She’s almost 20 years older, iirc.

    • LadySlippers says:

      •Violet• •MissMary•

      Tracy is his half sister that is quite a bit older than he is. I think she is about 18 years older than he is and even if I’m wrong about the exact age difference, it’s still pretty significant.

  18. jammypants says:

    His comment on fanfiction/slash is priceless.

    I completely agree with this:

    “It’s an insult for anybody of authority or standing to sign off on him with their approval and say, ‘Oh, he’s forgiven.’ The only person who should be [doing the] forgiving is Turing, and he can’t because we killed him. And it makes me really angry. It makes me very angry.”

    • icerose says:

      @jimmypants it males me angry that he fails to mention that 75,000 men were also prosecuted under the same archaic law and most of whom went to prison and none of them have been pardoned. I think it is criminal to give Turing a pass and just forget about the others because they are deemed inferior and not worthy of a pardon. They should have acknowledged the law was at fault and drooped all the prosecutions.
      Some people have reported that the judge chose hormone treatment ( which at the time was not seen as harmful) because it would keep him out of prison and allowed him to continue his work. It was also felt he would be more damaged in prison so in a sense as bad as the situation was he was offered special treatment. Most of the gay men who were prosecuted did not get that option and as gay men they would have suffered persecution with in the prison. None of those men some of who are probably alive to day were offered the option of a pardon let alone forgiveness.
      I know Benedict means well but he really needs to focus on the bigger picture in terms of past inequities.

      • delorb says:

        I know that he can’t do anything right in your eyes, but isn’t the subject Turing and not all those other men? If one is asked a specific question, shouldn’t they answer specifically?

      • allheavens says:

        @icerose

        Well, maybe that’s something you can work on. If you think all the men who were imprisoned because they were homosexuals before the laws were repealed, then by all means you should address that issue in a serious manner.

        Most people think homosexuality was legalized in the UK in 1967. It wasn’t. The Sexual Offences Act of 1967 was only a partial decriminalization (basically through non-enforcement of the law ) and it only applied to England and Wales. It was not extended to Scotland until 1980 and to Northern Ireland in 1982. The law in its totality was not repealed until 2003.

        To say that Turing was given a pass is ridiculous, the anti-Enigma bombes he created no doubt changed the tide of the war, saved an estimated 14,000,000 lives and gave birth to the computer age. If not for Turing we might be living in a very different world.

        He was not given special treatment, other gay men were given the option of prison, chemical castration or so-called ‘aversion therapy’ – the infliction of electric shocks or drug-induced nausea while they were shown naked male images. Turing was not alone in this.

        Benedict gave a specific answer to a specific question. I think he made his feeling about the persecution of homosexuals then and now quite clear. His feelings on the subject were quite transparent.

      • icerose says:

        @delorb Just because I do not take everything he says as gospel and question some of the premises behind his statements does not mean he can do no right in my eyes, My point was that it is not necessarily just about Turing and it isa shame he does not raise the issue of the people who were prosecuted in a similar manner to Turing and I cannot see a reason why he does not if he cares as much as he says he does,

      • delorb says:

        @ice,

        “My point was that it is not necessarily just about Turing”

        But the QUESTIONS he’s being asked are.

      • icerose says:

        @Delorb yes he gets asked about the film but he chooses the response and you can direct answers any way you want. It is standard interview technique.

      • Lilacflowers says:

        Somehow, if the questions are being asked in a publication called “OUT”, whose target audience is gays and which covers subject matter of interest to and affecting gays, as opposed to “out” referring to the wilderness and outdoorsmen, then it is about gays in general and not just about one man, as in how the fate of that one man may or may not intersect with all similarly situated men .

      • delorb says:

        @Lilac,

        The only reason he’s on the cover of this gay magazine is to promote his movie about one particular gay man. He was not given the cover or an interview to discuss gays specifically, which is what Ice wants. “My point was that it is not necessarily just about Turing”

        He said this, “It’s not a history lesson — it’s a warning that this could very easily happen again. People are being beheaded in countries right now because of their beliefs or sexual orientations. It’s terrifying. It’s medieval” Why isn’t that enough?

        @ice,

        Yes, he can go off on any tangent he likes, but why should he become the spokesperson for gay rights, when all he did was star in a movie about one gay man? Would that make him an authority? So by this logic, Sandra Bullock should be able to discuss the current situation at NASA, meteor attacks or how long someone can last with very little oxygen. Oh, she can’t? Well then.

      • Lilacflowers says:

        @delorb, I am fully aware as to why he is on the cover of the magazine – he is Oscar campaigning and he happens to portray a gay character. But the magazine is not a trade publication; it goes beyond that and when answering he questions, he chose to keep to his Oscar campaign.

      • delorb says:

        @lilac,

        I don’t think you do, because you seem to think that anyone who shows up on the cover should become the spokesperson for that magazine’s subject. So if he gets the cover of Pie Eating for Men, he should suddenly know all there is to know about pie eating? Jeez.

      • icerose says:

        @allheavens
        I am not saying Turing got a pass but it is argued elsewhere that according to the information from that time that his lawyers put forward the hormone castration because it allowed him to continue with his work.
        The impression I was that it was not a question of choice but down to the judges decision and if you can provide proof that this was not the caseacroos all the convictions I am willing to accept it.
        What I cannot accept is that one man who broke the law like others who were prosecuted gets a pardon because of a gift which enabled him to help others whilst other victim did not. To me all of those men were persecuted and deserved to be pardon and rationing it out as some link of reward fo good behaviour just does not work for me. If it was wrong for him it was wrong for the others full stop.

    • jammypants says:

      @Icerose, it’s a shame that so many men were treated that way, but honestly, it’s not really Cumberbatch to fault in this. His answer to the question was solely on the topic of Turing. It’s those who prosecuted those thousands of men who are wrong. I do think he’s improved over his past verbal vomiting in interviews. I like this interview because he’s not being vague, but he’s also back to his biting honesty, which can come off as offensive.

      I’m a bit ambivalent about his campaigning remark though! I think he does care.

      • icerose says:

        @Jimmypants Nobody is blaming Benny for what happened to the men but the issue about the other men who were not pardoned was raised as soon as Turing was pardoned and I cannot believe he is not aware of the discussions going on at the time and an just surprised he has never raise it as an issue.
        I do think he ha stopped making statements which had always seem to me to be publicity clicks but sometimes I just wish he would think a bit more about what he says before trotting out simplistic opinions because it tends to put me off his work. It goes back to me preferring him back in the days before Sherlock and the press pandering

      • jammypants says:

        @ice, I’m going to give him the benefit of doubt since I don’t know the full extent of the interview. I do wonder if he’ll offer more elaborate thoughts on the subject in other interviews. I don’t really read all his interviews, but this one interested me.

        I think my first Ben press exposure was post-Sherlock, and he had the foot in mouth syndrome with the Downton Abbey criticisms during a Parade’s End interview. Downton Abbey is crock of bile, but I recall thinking what he said was out of line (because Parade’s End wasn’t very good to me either even though I tried to like it for Ben’s sake but failed to).

  19. Kms1017 says:

    honestly, the only thing in the interview that made me shake my head was the comment about he can’t stop a guard from punching a teenage girl in the face or something to that effect. Has that happened? I totally get the guards maybe taking some hysterical girls/aggressive autograph hunters away, if they feel it will put benedict or others in danger. But, punching….a bit extreme. And it’s not really a side eye at him but more at the guards he has.

    • Lindy79 says:

      To be fair they probably would have been hired by the event, which I think was Comic Con. They tend to provide handlers and security to people.

    • MissMary says:

      I tend to think he waxes hyperbolic about some things–I’m sure the security provided by various venues and events can be pretty intense, but I don’t know if it’s “punch a teenage autograph seeker” intense.

    • delorb says:

      Have you ever heard of security at any of these events actually punching teenage girls?

      • MissMary says:

        Nope. I’ve heard some goers say the security could be pushy or aggressive but I haven’t personally heard of anyone being assaulted. Pushed back, yes, but not punched. I am not intending to possibly victim blame/shame, but I wonder if some of the “OMG security were goons and so rough!” is born of embarrassment and/or not groking the job these people have to do and being grossly outnumbered by event-goers. IDK–I have never myself had problems at conventions, concerts, etc but I’ve never been an autograph or picture seeker type so haven’t been in those kinds of crushed- crowd situations.

      • delorb says:

        I guess I should have put @Kms1017, in my comment. I just find it weird that people will read something like that and immediately think it may have happened. Never mind the fact that there hasn’t been any news reports of it happening at any of Benedict’s events. We both know that it would be huge news if it had.

  20. MountainRunner says:

    Love the witty comments on this site and the willingness to call actors on the carpet. Finally putting my two cents in…

    I am increasingly ambivalent when it comes to Bendy. He’s a talented actor who deserves recognition for his work, he’s weirdly attractive and has an endearing public persona. That being said, we’re only 6 weeks into Oscar campaign season and I’m already sick of his ubiquitousness and we still have 4 months left. Ugh. I think what bugs me the most is that he seems to say one thing and do another. He says he just cares about people seeing the film but campaigns like Harvey’s lapdog. What a contrast to Bill Murray’s unwillingness to bow to The Weinstein and be his own man.

    Then there’s the SH factor. He, SH and Karon know full well that if SH is sent out of the front door of the Corinthian Hotel five minutes ahead of BC that she will be photographed and if she is seen walking the red carpet alone that it will send the gossip machine into overdrive yet again. Don’t tell me they’re trying to hide — this was a calculated move to keep the tongues wagging, regardless of the nature of their relationship.

    So I’m not hating on Bendy, just wish he’d walk the talk and stop complaining about fame when it’s obviously given him A-list benefits that he’s taking advantage of. Yes, he has some ridiculous, obsessed fans that need to take a chill pill, but so does Hiddles and you don’t see him going on and on about it.

    Thanks for letting me vent, y’all — feeling much better now. 🙂

    • Megan says:

      Enough with the SH talk already. His fandom’s obsession on this is extreme and tiresome. Harassing twitter accounts, calling others to do so and demanding if a tall brunette was with him from everyone who dares to see him, smell him, talk to him, or be in the same building with him.

      And then telling him how he should be behaving with regards to a woman who could just be his friend to suit the needs of his fans? Come on.

      • MissMary says:

        Oh god, the sock puppet twitter accts, harassing posters until they get the answer they want… that’s damned near abusive. I’d tell someone “yeah, sure, it looked like her/him/it/that/them” too if it got them to back the eff off.

      • Tippet says:

        Megan, word. I’m continually baffled as to why anyone cares about this man’s personal life. The only theory I can come up with is that the commenters who keep bringing it up are really young, like 14, or something.

        Anyway god he’s hot. I want to lick those cheekbones

      • Felice says:

        they are actually more like 40

      • Xantha says:

        I agree it’s creepy and obsessive. If he wants to keep that aspect to his life to himself that’s fine. Who is he hurting in not telling the general public who his girlfriend is?

        And contrary to what MountainRenner says, the mainstream press isn’t even that interested.

      • jammypants says:

        Actually the more obsessive ones are 30-50.

    • Jane says:

      @MountainRunner – Ita

    • lindy79 says:

      *claps*

    • Green Eyes says:

      He is a bit of a whiner, isn’t he?

      I remember an Aussie friend telling me this joke: “How can you tell when a plane full of Brits has landed at the airport? Answer: When the pilots turn off the engines and the plane is still whinging [whining].”

    • Jan says:

      @MountainRunner: im not bothered because he’s still in the adjustment phase. This didn’t really ramp up until late last year, and most actors go through a period of ‘ahhhh’ when stuff starts getting really weird for a year or two, Murray did in fact lol. Many end up mixed up in drugs, alcohol or have a breakdown, so whining for a bit is pretty tame and normal.

      however, he’s got some unusually bad fans, it’s more than just garden variety ‘ridiculous, obsessed fans’ types imo, and i dont think he expected it at his age. I certainly didnt.

      • Nic says:

        His crazy fans are most definitely not unique to him. Not at all. Every person with a profile has them. You only have to look as far as hiddleston to find worse.

      • jammypants says:

        I do think it’s all funny because he’s 38, and I can’t think of any other actor around that age with such a following. Maybe David Tennant? But he was huge in his early 30s when Doctor Who was is claim to fame. Being a bit more mature can help him deal with the ills of fame.

      • delorb says:

        @Nic,

        So true. The Twilight fans should also be put in that group. Or the fans of Angie/Jennifer (who seem obsessed with comparing everything each woman does as it relates to a relationship with a man) . As a fangroup, they fail the bechdel test each and every time). The Beliebers are another crazy group of fans that far outstrip the Benedict fans.

      • Jan says:

        I used to think that, Nic–and please, please you and everyone know I mean just a small percentage of fans, like I definitely don;t mean all or even most of them!!–but this is dang weird for someone near 40, what’s sprung up around him.

        Tweeting his IRL friends really nasty things, taking pics of his mail (or faking that, still what?), trying to locate and contact his parents, planning trips to his house, watching his house, a few stalkers of the actual serious variety, etc. It’s like he’s a child or something, just a bad vibe off of them.

        Your bigger celebs are more experienced, they have routines, personal security, even cleared perimeters. He’s still figuring all that out, I suspect.

      • Green Eyes says:

        Actually, one of my theories regarding Lord Bendy’s weird, detached behavior around La Artiste is because maybe one of his wackadoo fans has threatened her.

        I know, I am grasping at straws here with the totally weird craziness that has become the mating ritual of Lord Bendy (IF they are indeed dating)!

      • Nic says:

        @greeneyes
        Good lord no. Course not. For a start the truly crazy fans are very very small in numbers and the actual said mentals seem desperate for there to be something going on with her, hence the using every opportunity to tell everyone so online.

        And as I’ve said a few times now, she really isn’t staying hidden. She was in a hotel full of press, walked outside into press, got in to car five mins before him and arrived chauffeured onto red carpet stopped slap bang in front of fans and strode down the red carpet. Doesn’t scream someone who has an issue with attention to me.

    • MountainRunner says:

      @Green Eyes — thanks for the laugh! Whiny Pee Pants is what we call them in the music biz.

      Point was not SH, but rather that actions speak louder than words and in a growing number of instances Bendy’s don’t match. That’s all. Hell, he can bring another otter on the red carpet for all I care. I quit my cele-obsession with John Taylor of DD back in ’86. And there I go dating myself.

      I have a scholarly interest in fame and how it affects the famous and their fans. Not something I’d wish on anybody, that’s for damn sure.100 years of Hollywood history shows how much it fucks people in the head. I hope Bendy can keep his clear as he’s swirling in the fame tornado. I’d like to see Sherlock return for many more seasons…

    • Jany says:

      “I think what bugs me the most is that he seems to say one thing and do another.” That’s been crossing my mind mind lately as well. I just hope he won’t go on a Jared Leto kind of promo tour for TIG, because that’d be a tad too hypocritical for my taste. Just admit to promoting or don’t comment, but don’t say you won’t do the Weinstein promo circus and then all of sudden ‘change your mind’. I can’t see him having time for it though. He’s working now, he’ll be shooting in Belfast in November and then it’s Sherlock time again. Normal promo is part of the job. Harper’s Bazaar hosting a dinner for your movie isn’t really part of ‘normal promo’, but okay. Time will tell I guess. Don’t conform if you’re not cut out to be a conformist, that’d be my career advice for him. Not that he cares… 😉

      • MountainRunner says:

        Thanks Jany for not a) putting words in my mouth or b) going down a rabbit trail beyond the point of the post.

    • delorb says:

      @MountainRunner,

      The comparison to Bill Murray isn’t a good one. There is a huge age difference, so that someone in Bill’s position, who has probably seen it all, will react differently from someone like Benedict who is new to all this. Another thing is that Bill has jumped through hoops in the past. Several times to be exact. He’s danced the dance when he thought he’d get a nomination, that either didn’t materialize or didn’t win the ultimate prize (and he’s groused publicly about it). Sure he can be above it all now, but that wasn’t the case a few years ago.

      As for the secret girlfriend crap, I don’t get it? I don’t get why its so important to some fans. Once it becomes official, then what? Will the villagers put down their torches and pitchforks and head home? What is the end game to all this speculation?

      I don’t think Benedict and his people are playing this up for some big reveal, either. I think that the couple were taking it slow, got a whiff of the crazy-assed fans and probably decided not to go public out of fear. Some people are totally invested in what famous people do. To the point that some fans actually think they might have a shot. I mean, seriously.

      As for Hiddles, from what I’ve sussed from reading this blog, he USED to invite his fans into his personal life, until it got to be a bit much. (Some girlfriend who paid him to spend a vacation with her, that he used and dumped?) Now he’s keeping them at arms length (fewer tweets?). He probably won’t complain about them, not the kind of person he is, but this change in giving information says alot, IMO. I don’t think his fans are happy that he’s turned off the spigot.

      • MountainRunner says:

        No fan is happy to have the spigot turned off, but it’s absolutely necessary for the celeb to keep some level of sanity. Some of those fans are downright certifiable. It makes me sad, really. To put anyone on a pedestal and idolize them does nothing good for anyone, it will just make actual relationships with real, flawed human beings more difficult for them as they compare them to the perfected image of the celeb in their minds.

        I’d love to see Bill going to lunch with Bendy and giving him some sage advise. I do think you’re right that despite being older when fame hit, BC isn’t experienced with how to handle these new aspects to fame and is stumbling a bit. I expect more from him than say, a 24YO, but perhaps I’m still expecting too much. It’s ok to say that he enjoys the benefits that his fame affords him and that the behavior of his extreme fans isn’t ok with him, IMO.

      • jammypants says:

        “(Some girlfriend who paid him to spend a vacation with her, that he used and dumped?) Now he’s keeping them at arms length (fewer tweets?).”

        That’s the first I’ve heard. Sounds like a crazy fan made this rumor up.

      • delorb says:

        ” I do think you’re right that despite being older when fame hit, BC isn’t experienced with how to handle these new aspects to fame and is stumbling a bit.”

        I didn’t say that. I’m saying that its an apples to oranges comparison because of the age differences of the two men. But that when Bill was younger (around the age Benedict is now), he danced the dance, just like Benedict. Its easy to take the high road when your career is winding down, IMO.

        I also don’t think I said that he’s stumbling with fame. He seems to have good handle on keeping his fans at arms length. He doesn’t tweet them. He doesn’t give a blow by blow of his various locations. That’s a very savvy thing to do, IMO. That way, when fans become too much, he won’t have to do an about face and cut them off.

        “It’s ok to say that he enjoys the benefits that his fame affords him and that the behavior of his extreme fans isn’t ok with him, IMO.”

        Agreed. And we all know that he’s getting freebies. He’s well known for his ahem, ‘frugality’, ahem. LOL.

        @jammy,

        I’m only relaying what I’ve read. And while I’m not the biggest fan and so it might all be be gossip, I stand by the fact that its something I read. LOL

      • MountainRunner says:

        Sorry, I should have clarified that I was seeing your point that Bill has the benefit of past experiences that BC doesn’t have yet. I wasn’t aware of Bill’s “dancing the dance” back in a day, celebs weren’t on my radar then.

        My addendum of stating that he’s stumbling a bit was my opinion regarding some of the confusing statements he’s made and how they relate to actions that I’ve seen.

        And yes, he’s smart to stay off of social media…

      • delorb says:

        Thanks for the clarification. I think we agree more than not. As for his stumbling statements, I don’t think anyone thought he wouldn’t dance for Harvey. You don’t turn down Harvey. Well, you can, but I don’t think it will work long term. Harvey seems to hear whatever he wants to hear. A ‘no’ becomes a ‘yes’ in his ears. I also don’t think Benedict can use the excuse that he’s busy filming on Harvey either. We shall see. FWIW, seeing more of Benedict is a good thing for me, so I hope he does do a bit of dancing.

      • Nic says:

        @delorb

        I think referring to them as ‘the couple’ is still pretty presumptuous given that nobody knows what the deal is really on that front. Tho’ suggesting there was no going public ‘out of fear and crazy assed fans’ is a pretty wild theory.
        Unless he’s crazy, I don’t this a few idiot fans are going to have any bearing on his behaviour. He really needs a reality check if THAT turned out to be the case and in terms of keeping anything from ‘going public’, as has been said here, she could’ve remained hidden at the premiere if she wanted to quite easily, so I don’t think she’s too bothered about not being public, whatever their situation is.

        As for Weinstein? Cannot stand the man. He’s about the awards, glory, money. The films come last in all that crap. It’s a pity to see him getting his claws into any movie that I am looking forward to.

      • Lilacflowers says:

        @delorb, you posted that you read it on THIS blog but Jammypants never saw it and neither did I so it is very doubtful you read it here. But this statement of yours made me laugh: “And while I’m not the biggest fan …”

        As for campaigning for Weinstein, there are many, many ways to Oscar campaign, and they include giving countless magazine interviews in which you claim you are too busy to campaign. Especially when the publication dates for those magazines put them on the December newstands when your movie comes out in November. BC is campaigning and he is campaigning heavily.

      • jammypants says:

        @Lilac, I’m guessing it’s like a marriage between the BoraBora gossip and the weird MissThing rant a while back. MissThing claimed she was used and left behind. Although not sure where the payment part came in?

      • An says:

        -Lilacflowers: yes, he’s campaigning–really, would Harvey have it any other way, lol–but not heavily yet. Right now he’s doing the same level he did for ST and TFE, which is odd, but it does look like his schedule will prevent the full sweep.

        I don’t have an issue with campaigns, I should note, for selfish reasons. It gets smaller-budget movies I wouldn’t normally get the chance to see where I am into my local theater. You’ve got to do press for your movie anyway, make it benefit me 😀

      • Lilacflowers says:

        @jammypants, I remember Miss Thing, her inability to answer my questions, and her inconsistencies very well but there was nothing about paying for anything.

        And Delorb, you brought this up.

      • Nic says:

        He’s already done way more interviews for TIG than he did for STID

      • 'P'enny says:

        Delorb is trolling with hiddles SG stuff – it has picked it up off that tumblr-cray-cray looney bin of skanky-anons anti-Hiddles site. ignore. 😁

      • delorb says:

        @lilac,

        On this blog there was talk of his being stalked while on location by crazy fans and how he wasn’t as open as before. There was another thread that discussed Benedict’s secret girlfriend, which, of course, led to talk about Tom and how he handled his secret vacation girlfriend who did the walk of shame from their vacation together. Perhaps you missed that one.

        As for his campaigning, I never said that he wasn’t. I even said that he’s going to find that its difficult to say ‘no’ to Harvey.

        “And Delorb, you brought this up.”

        Um, no. This is from Mountain: “Yes, he has some ridiculous, obsessed fans that need to take a chill pill, but so does Hiddles”, to which I replied with the above. LOL

        @Penny,

        Its also discussed on non-cray-cray pro-hiddles sites like this one and IMDB too. Just sayin.

      • Lilacflowers says:

        @’p’enny, most definitely.

      • jammypants says:

        meh, I put it down to the crazies then.

  21. Pat says:

    in this pics he looks “otter” than ever lol

  22. Ellen says:

    Wait! What subject are we on now? It all moves so fast here 🙂

  23. MissMary says:

    So who wants to bet on whether or not GN is going to bring up fandom flail on his show? I doubt he’ll bring up the relationship b.s. but I mean the Out interview and the like. I’d like to see a more serious interview about TIG but I don’t think GN is going to be the one to do it.

    • Kazlock 1307 says:

      I doubt there’ll be anything serious about the GN show at all…but very occasionally one of the guests relaxes and let’s their guard down.
      So you never know..we may learn something new about BC.
      Obviously BC will announce that SH is the lurve of his life 5ever!!!

      • MissMary says:

        Naaaaah… he’s gonna announce the tiny hat is his true love!

      • Kazlock 1307 says:

        MissMary.. Was SH wearing his tiny hat when she walked the botanical gardens do you think?Or did she dave it for the plane home,when she “seemed close” to him?

      • MissMary says:

        The hat flew first class in its own seat!

      • Lilacflowers says:

        I am so sorry that I didn’t destroy the hat for you all but he didn’t have it with him when I saw him and I wasn’t going to frisk him.

      • Kazlock 1307 says:

        @Lilacflowers
        Please don’t destroy the hat!!He has more chemistry with it than he does SH!!
        @MissMary
        The hat should travel first class…SH ,though,is an entirely different matter!

      • MissMary says:

        A mark of how tired I am… I am picturing the hat on a covert ops sort of mission, fighting for it’s life against fans irked by it’s tiny hat-ness.

      • Lilacflowers says:

        @Kazlock, he has left Boston and took the hat with him so the hat is safe from me.

      • Kazlock 1307 says:

        Hello my lovelies.
        Can someone set me straight please?Has there been any confirmation from the girl on the plane that it was definatly SH?
        EB posters are baiting each other over it,but I can’t find anything definate. An”I think so”..but not a “Yes,it’s her”.
        And what happened to the other person who originally saw him on the plane?Did they tweet anything else?

      • MissMary says:

        Kazlock: Nope. More of the same. Ignore the tripe on EB–it’s all bull. I’m not even kidding. A bunch of retweeting sockpuppet twitter feeds that exist solely to bug people who post “sightings,” a lot of ‘Omg wake up! it’s happening!’ crap… I’d be interested to see what some of these ‘spotters’ say if they were shown a pic of generic brunette from stock photography. More interestingly, the reaction of the ‘truthers’ when the response is “I think so… maybe?”

        Many of the people who post about seeing him are locking down their accounts after being harassed by ‘truthers’, or flat ignoring subsequent questions (smart thing to do, imho).

      • Kazlock 1307 says:

        Thanks MissMary
        I wish someone would take a picture!!
        The tweet thing is odd.I first heard 3 separate people had tweeted to say they’d seen him on plane/at airport.
        One mentioned a brunette she didn’t recognise. Which became,after pics were sent,I think it is.And they were close.(which didn’t really answer the “were they romantic?any PDA?)
        From 2 rows back how do you tell if they’re”close”?And did the other people who tweeted their sighting just disappear??
        I’m still in denial(I think),but it’s a strange goings on.

      • MissMary says:

        IDK… I was pretty close to the hot Dutch guy on seated next to me on the plane to Germany last summer but we were in coach with like two inches of space between us so… grain of salt lol.

      • sigh((s)) says:

        Oh miss Mary. At least you got the hot Dutch guy. I always get the snoring, odorous businessman and the kid behind me with restless leg syndrome.
        😉

      • MissMary says:

        LOL it was honestly a first for me. I usually get Captain Body Odor.

      • Kazlock 1307 says:

        @MissMary
        It’s bloody strange, whatever it is.The LFF performance was like a mini production all by itself!

    • Linz says:

      @Kazlock.

      No, she did not confirm that it was her. She bounced around a lot. Went from “I did not recognize the woman.” to “I think so” to “I am pretty sure it was her” to “I am not certain. But I am pretty sure it was her.” She said “they were close” then changed it to “they seemed close.”

      I would take what that girl said with a grain of salt. The others who saw him on the plane. Did not mention a woman. They are ignoring questions from the sockpuppet accounts. Good for them!

      Several people on EB dismiss things. Such as, the other two women who saw him on the plane and did not mention a woman. They dismiss the part where the Botanical Gardens guy said “Not really sure if I’m being honest.” (after he saw a photo of Sophie) They dismiss the photo of Benedict eating a sandwich alone in France. They dismiss the fact that Benedict was alone, when he took the photo with a fan in France. (Both the fan and his friend said that Benedict was alone)

      Even though the girl who Tweeted that she saw Benedict with a “chick.” Did not describe the woman, did not confirm that it was Sophie. They want to believe that it was Sophie, and that he took her to Paris, to buy her a dress. (The dress she wore to LFF, can be purchased in London) They dismiss, the people who said they did not see Benedict at the Elbow Concert with Sophie. They only believe the person who said she was. (The person who said she was there, is a regular on EB.. Go figure!) They dismiss the people who said it was only Benedict, Anna Wintour and her guest at the Theatre.

      Even though the whole Parcel/Labels thing, turned out to be BS. Some people on EB, want to believe that it’s real and that they are living together.

      Not all, but some people on that Blog are pretty desperate. They are starting to use/post old photos. Someone posted a photo from a Wedding 5 years ago, trying to say that it was from the BTTF Secret Cinema. Sophie is in the picture, and it is not confirmed who the man in front of her is. Some think it’s Benedict. If it is Benedict, so what? They have known each other since 2008/2009. And he was dating Olivia..

      • MissMary says:

        My partner was filling me in on some of that (omg they are now hooked on the EB drama and I had to tell ’em please only tell me like one thing a day from there so they can vent the wtfery but I don’t have to hear the whole saga)… It sounds pretty thirsty, imho, on the part of those desperate for it to be SH. If it is, it is. But the level of soap opera drama they’re ascribing to the situation is insane.

      • Tara says:

        I’ve heard this a few times now, so I have to ask. What is a sockpuppet account?

        When was he in France?

      • MissMary says:

        @tara: sockpuppet accts are set up for trolling or to be “anonymous”. sometimes people set up multiple accounts to harass someone or to spam, and the accounts are like sockpuppets–they may have a name and a basic bio, but there’s ‘nothing in them’–it’s all fake.

        And he was in france many times over the years, most recently a few weeks ago. He’s gone there since he was a child, according to interviews he’s given where he’s been asked about places he enjoys traveling.

      • Tara says:

        Ah, I see. Thanks, MissMary. Sound like pests to me 🙂

        I meant the most recent trip to France. I thought maybe he was there now and was getting ready for more…stuff. Lol.

      • Kazlock 1307 says:

        Thanks to you all.
        Do we know if BC is back filming yet?In Wales I think,Cowbridge?
        And if he is I wonder if SH is staying to

  24. joe spider says:

    Well, with all the money he has earned, you’d think he could have found a jumper without a hole to be photographed in. 🙂

  25. joe spider says:

    @ jammypants says:
    October 15, 2014 at 5:26 pm
    “(Some girlfriend who paid him to spend a vacation with her, that he used and dumped?) Now he’s keeping them at arms length (fewer tweets?).

    That’s the first I’ve heard. Sounds like a crazy fan made this rumor up.”

    I have a theory on that one, I’ll share it on the next Hiddles thread.

    • sigh((s)) says:

      I think that’s going to be awhile, as he has nothing coming up. Why don’t you go ahead and share…
      🙂

      I don’t even understand what this person was talking about? Maybe that’s what you’re going to share?

    • jammypants says:

      Unless we’re lucky and have some fan sightings of his Hank Williams film set? Maybe one Kaiser suggested on #MorningWood? :p

      • sigh((s)) says:

        Is he still in Nashville? Or London? Or NO? This is really the only place I follow anybody. I’m completely reliant on you ladies (and gents).

      • Ellen says:

        Some new photos from the Andy Gotts photo shoot has been “leaked”.

        I don’t get this hidden GF thing. It’s so 90’s thing to do so it would make them appear available. Justin Bieber and One Direction have the ultimate crazy, batshit fans and none of them has hidden a GF. Strange.

      • 'P'enny says:

        He lost his underwear again on those Gotts photos! 😍❤️ Seriously he needs to do some shopping.

        @sighs he’s filming now in Shreveport – all systems a gogo

      • Lilacflowers says:

        The Gotts photos are fantastic.

      • sigh((s)) says:

        Not loving the gotts photos. He looks old and haggard. Terrible lighting. Obviously that’s what he was going for, but still…

      • jammypants says:

        Penny, what photos? I must see them. For no other reason other than to satiate my Hiddles thirst.

        ok, so I had a look. I like them. I don’t think he looks old, but weathered like leather, yes.

    • joe spider says:

      @ sighs –

      yes – my theory on the next Hiddles thread, many on here will know who I am talking about.

      • 'P'enny says:

        best not – it’s not as bad as the SH stuff, but it’s had its day. I’d rather she was left alone. [pass me a tissue]

      • koko says:

        Well I’m anxious to hear about the “theory”, but in all fairness this is a BC thread.

      • Ellen says:

        @Joe Spider. If you’ve got something to say say it because you’re beginning to sound like a troll. It’s their problem if they don’t like it

  26. Kms1017 says:

    @delorb-I just found the comment weird is all. And I personally hadn’t heard of anyone getting punched in the face which is why I asked.

    • delorb says:

      Ah. Now I understand. I just thought it weird that someone would punch a fan and it not make headlines. Thanks.

  27. Nat says:

    I just have to say that tonight I saw the National Theatre Live film of “Frankenstein” with Bendy in the role of the monster. OMG that man can fill out a loincloth!! I had no idea he has just a great body. *swoons*

    If you get a chance, see it. Both he and Jonny Lee Miller were fantastic.

    • delorb says:

      I totally agree with you. The man has a great body. He should really do more physical roles, IMO.

  28. KMS1017 says:

    They are showing Frankenstein in my theater the 27th and 29th, both at seven. Problem, I work until 7:15. C’est la vie:(

  29. KMS1017 says:

    @tara-yay, perfect way to celebrate halloween….I think I’m going to ask if I can leave a half hour early from work to go see it. I have 400 hours of paid time off to use and I have a co worker took a whole day off to go see back to the future in the theater last year.

  30. KMS1017 says:

    So, out of some weird curiousity I looked up the eggsbenedish page. It actually hurt my head with all the theories and people upset about the “florals” comment. So, the man wasn’t up to taking fan pictures that day, when he was on a job. Eesh!! I honestly wouldn’t be a very good sleuth, because I don’t know how they found those old sophie pictures. But, then again, I’m not looking hard enough for them.

    • Tara says:

      What are the florals comments? I stay away from there, but if you’re brave enough to go through that mess and want to share, I’d appreciate it. Haha.

  31. KMS1017 says:

    @tara-oh, he made a comment about a couple women who were looking at him while in his interview with OUT. Said something like “oh god, the florals over there, here we go.” One of the two women later interrupted interview and asked for a picture for her daughter. He politely said no. So now some think that he hates his middle-aged fans and are wanting to start a campaign on events he is at, they wear floral patterns.

    It was a weird experience at eb, not going back.

    • Intro Outro says:

      @KMS1017, why would florals be offensive? Non-native speaker here. I mean, does this word have a fixed negative connotation when referred to women? Or is it just an instance of cumberspeak?

      • MissMary says:

        People were taking it to mean he was classing all middle aged women as the “florals” and using the word in a negative way (like…frumpy or something).

      • sigh((s)) says:

        He should take care to remember that he is *very* rapidly approaching middle age, and that his dress sense is no better.

      • Tara says:

        Ooh, I could see where some would take offense to that. It could be rude, depending on what he actually said and how he said it.

        I obviously don’t know how the women were acting, and hope they didn’t interrupt him, but his comment seems a bit snide. At least on paper.

      • Nic says:

        I can see why people have assumed it was a pejorative collective noun but I really don’t think it was meant that way. From the way he said it, I do think it was just descriptive. Eg: blue dress, or black jackets. I think the only reason people have taken it as a slight is because of the connection between older women and floral clothing. That wouldn’t be my first thought and I’d be VERY surprised if he would mean it in that way. And he certainly wouldn’t be silly enough to say it to a journo if it was intended in such a way.

  32. Encumbered says:

    Oh, dear Misty: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/misty-upham-missing-body-august-741460

    She was quite smitten with BC and spoke very affectionately of him on twitter not too long after AOC wrapped.

    • MissMary says:

      I’ve been following her story and it’s so horrible. I had been hoping they’d find her alive and, if not well, at least able to be helped.