Matt Damon thinks the Oscars should be on a 10-year time delay

fp_1976843_matt_damon_cycles_cape_argus_for_make_a_difference_charity_

Matt Damon is still pissed that it took so many decades for the Academy to recognize Martin Scorsese. The two worked together for the first time in 2006’s The Departed, and the famous director had a big impact on the Bourne Supremacy actor in many ways. The biggest way? Matt thinks that the Academy should be on a ten-year delay. For example, the Oscars just held last month should have been recognizing films that were made in 1998. And last year’s films shouldn’t be recognized until the 2019 ceremony. Good luck with that, Matt. Contact Music has more:

Matt Damon insists the Oscars are no indication of whether films are good or not – even though he’s a past winner. The Bourne Supremacy star picked up a Best Screenplay Oscar in 1998 for Good Will Hunting, a film which also earned him a Best Actor nomination – but he’s skeptical about the way the Academy picks its winners.

He tells Parade.com, “I think that the best way to judge movies is, like, 10 years after they’re released. I think they should actually do the awards that way. I think they should have done the Academy Awards this year for movies from 1998. I think it’s better to look at a movie and then step back and look at it again. I don’t think that the awards necessarily get it right. I think they get it wrong more often than they get it right.”

It’s not the first time the actor has questioned the validity of the Oscars – he campaigned for director Martin Scorsese to win his first Academy Award three years ago (06), insisting the prizegiving would be a “farce” if the moviemaker was overlooked for The Departed.

He said, “Marty’s such a great, great director. He really wants it (Oscar) and he hasn’t made that a secret. He’s been upfront about saying it would really mean a lot to him.”

“He never felt that Hollywood had validated his work because his work is centered around the east coast and New York and that somehow threatened the establishment or something. But it demeans the Oscars more than it demeans Marty that he doesn’t have one, to be honest with you. Once he receives his (Oscar), then everyone who has one, their award is validated.”

Scorsese won his first Best Director Oscar for The Departed. It was the sixth time he had been nominated for the award.

[From Contact Music]

I totally understand the sentiments behind what Matt is saying. The Academy has made so many bone-headed decisions, especially in the past ten years. It used to be an actor would usually win an Oscar for the performance that, as it turns out, is their most famous. Like Gregory Peck winning for To Kill A Mockingbird. Or Audrey Hepburn winning for Roman Holiday. But Nicole Kidman winning for The Hours? Don’t get me wrong, it was a fine performance. But ten years from now, people will remember Nicole Kidman for Moulin Rouge.

There would also be the unintentional side-effect of the ten-year Oscar campaign, which Harvey Weinstein would probably still dominate. How many interviews could an actor or director give about a film they did ten years ago? How would the publicity even ramp up? But, as I said, I understand Matt’s sentiments. I wonder if he thinks his Oscar-winning screenplay for Good Will Hunting stands the test of time?

Here’s Matt Damon at the 68-mile Cape Argus bike trek on Sunday in South Africa. Images thanks to WENN.com.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

20 Responses to “Matt Damon thinks the Oscars should be on a 10-year time delay”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Lem says:

    matt might be onto something

  2. RAN says:

    I agree Lem, this makes a lot of sense. It would be sort of like the Hall of Fame… only the most worthy (or those with the most votes) get in.

    Yes, I still think Good Will Hunting would stand the test of time – awesome movie.

  3. Baholicious says:

    It’s all Prom Queen/King shit. Matt’s 1,000% right.

  4. Aspen says:

    He seems to be pissed off about a LOT lately.

    In this case, I actually think he’s got a pretty darned good idea, but I no longer find him sexy.

    Angry men turn me off…big time.

  5. Dorothy says:

    He’s making a film in Africa, and really spinning the whole (I feel their pain thing) to sell the movie.
    And I no longer think he’s a hunk ..
    He has hung out with gore and got side swiped with the (ugly stupid) look.

  6. Menace says:

    Boo fricken’ hoo. Damon comes across as a whiny baby, especially when he campaigned for Martin’s Oscar. We all want stuff, so it’s hard to shed tears over millionaires who don’t get what they want the minute they want it.

  7. Chicoulino says:

    The academy has made many mistakes and has awarded alot of wrong people,and especially wrong movies.Sean Penn was amazing in the film I am Sam,but they didn’t award him.There are hundreds of examples out there.The List is soooo long.Meryl Streep is another example.I don’t think that her perfomance in Kramer vs Kramer was one of her two best perfomances til now.Are they kidding?

  8. Ling says:

    Oh my, can you imagine? Even the nominations… well, Titanic would certainly be screwed, as would, in fact, The Departed. I’m quite confident that, 10 years from now, Little Miss Sunshine will be the standout film of 2006.

  9. Feebee says:

    1 year, 5 years, 10 years, they could still stuff it up. If Hollywood’s like high school, can you imagine what a 10 high school reunion would be like? Please! ANd they still wouldn’t have the balls to include a public loving blockbuster about a superhero.

  10. Pufft says:

    Looky what we have here…

    I actually cycled with Matt at the Cape Argus Cycle Tour in Cape Town over the weekend.

    Spoke to him for about a minute, and he seems to be an OK guy.

    As for his sentiments, agree to some degree. If you think about it, in 10 years time, you will only remember he good movies shot now.

    Of course, ten years is too long. Perhaps three.

  11. Celebitchy says:

    I think angry, slightly larger Damon is hotter. I like grumpy guys. He was right about Palin and took a lot of heat for being the first person to say it. Thanks for letting us know about meeting Damon, Pufft! I agree that three years is a more realistic time frame if you want to put a time delay on the Oscars.

  12. Ling says:

    @Chicoulino: Please don’t mention I Am Sam. As far as I’m concerned, that’s the only area in which the academy did right. From now until the end of time, whenever they mis-award, for a moment I’ll think, “This institution is not worth the goldleaf they adorn their statues with.”

    And then, I’ll remember Sean Penn and his snub. And I’ll think, “Somewhere in there, past the buffoonery and manufactured mythos, there is a core of truth. I have faith in you, Academy. I have faith.”

  13. Tess says:

    Like they’re really sooooo important that we need to deliberate the question for 10 years!!!!!

    Hilarious.

  14. Lara says:

    I totally agree with Matt!!! Oscars are all about buzz and who’s hot/who’s not at the time; the decisions are made based on politics, current trends, and basically what the “hot topics” are. Removing the movie from that context really exposes how good the quality of the movie is. My husband and I have been watching some of the best pictures from past…American Beauty (loved it…def. should have won), Shakespeare in Love (watching it now, it looks like a good version of Emma or Pride and Predjudice..nothing that special) I think things would be a lot different…NO Titanic for sure!!! I still think the Academy is embarrassed for joining in on the hype…I’m sure some of them still refuse to talk about the 1997 Oscars!!

  15. czarina says:

    I also agree with the concept, although NOT because of Martin Scorsese. I think the awards are too close to all the popular events surrounding them to be given any real objective credibility. I think 5 or 10 years WOULD be better, though, because even 3 years doesn’t change much in terms of the politics behind the awards.
    I wonder if Heath Ledger would have won if there had been a ten year delay (i.e. was his award based more on sympathy than respect for his performance?). I’m not saying he definately would NOT have won…just wondering how much it would have changed.

  16. really? says:

    Nice picture of him grabbing himself!

  17. Ally says:

    Totally agree! It’s supposed to be an Academy of (Motion Picture) Arts, not as it has been since the 90s, a popularity contest, or rewarding ‘Greatest Histrionics in Acting’ and ‘Most Cloying, Pandering Best Movie’.

  18. Sally says:

    Matt, you’re an ignorant, obnoxious pig who’s married to a lazy, stupid, unattractive titty-bar dancer. Just shut your fat face and keep making those crappy movies that nobody watches while simultaneously neglecting your kids. At least your poor parenting skills creates job opportunities – on two continents! No need to save a date on the calendar – you won’t be attending the Oscars anytime soon.

  19. raven says:

    Sally, get a clue. Then come back.

    Damon was always an intense guy. Affleck tells a lot of stories about meeting him and their experiences in high school. He says that Damon was always very intense about acting and drama and getting into films and life. Once he was famous, he apparently became more modest or at least acted that way. It seems that he has now returned to his old self. He just appears to be feeling more confident.

  20. Ruby says:

    Vry interesting to get some good information on this subject 😛 😀