Will Gwyneth Paltrow dump Brad Falchuk when she moves back to London?

wenn22702618

Gwyneth Paltrow returned to the US late last week after a week-long holiday in Italy with her on-again (or never off) boyfriend Brad Falchuk. Gwyneth went to the Valentino show and then she and Brad went to Positano for a pap-friendly beach vacay. The seemingly posed (?) paparazzi photos seemed to tell the world: Goop and Brad are fine. They are in love. Gwyneth is so elite and special that she managed to turn her married lover into her jumpoff and now legit boyfriend. All the rumors of a breakup – and the rumors of Brad’s inability to finalize his divorce – are all false. Right? Right. At least that’s the narrative Gwyneth wants… for now. The Daily Mail says the narrative may change a bit in the coming months, because Gwyneth is going to move back to London full-time:

It was only days ago that Gwyneth Paltrow and her American TV producer boyfriend Brad Falchuk were canoodling by the sea on Italy’s swanky Amalfi coast. But it seems their relationship, which only became public in April, could be heading for the rocks – because she is moving back to London from the US.

I hear Gwyneth, 41, wants her children Apple, 11, and Moses, nine, to attend one of London’s leading schools, after living in LA since she chose to ‘consciously uncouple’ from Chris Martin in 2014. Their divorce was finalised in April – but I’m told Gwyneth and Chris, 38, are ‘closer than ever’, and she is moving back into the Belsize Park family home in September.

A friend says Chris and Gwyneth want their children to attend independent Highgate School, adding: ‘It’s about the kids getting the best education and being happy and that means being in London. They still get along well. The house is big enough to live separate lives.’

[From The Daily Mail]

The living-together-sort-of thing is easy enough to do for Gwyneth and Chris because I believe their London home is actually two or three homes that went through endless renovations to “attach” and make into one huge family home. You know who did something similar? Mick Jagger and Jerry Hall. Even after they divorced, they lived in a huge, extended family home and co-parented their children. As for the move from LA… I can believe it. I can believe that Gwyneth probably wants her kids to be educated in England. But let’s wait and see… I think that Gwyneth has based most of the operations for Goop.com in LA, so she might not be able to move to London at the moment. Unless she plays on telecommuting, which is a strong possibility too.

As for Gwyneth and Brad… well, IF they break up, of course it will be on Gwyneth’s terms.

wenn22702623

Photos courtesy of WENN.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

41 Responses to “Will Gwyneth Paltrow dump Brad Falchuk when she moves back to London?”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Retty says:

    Speaking on behalf of all the people of London- we don’t want her back. USA, you can fell free to keep this one

    • BengalCat2000 says:

      I’m afraid both countries are stuck with her.

    • frisbeejada says:

      Can I add ‘speaking on behalf of all the people in the UK’ to that? This is payback for Piers Morgan this is!

      • Bread and Circuses says:

        Actually, Lindsay Lohan was payback for Piers Morgan. Cockroaches trade for cockroaches. I’m not sure who Gwyneth is a trade for.

    • Lilacflowers says:

      Pluto! Can we send her to Pluto? Think of the educational opportunities for the kids and all the new Goop fodder.

    • Kiddo says:

      Retty, the US and Paltrow are consciously uncoupling. It’s not dignified to start trouble with the ex. Just embrace it.

  2. LAK says:

    Does that mean JLaw is also moving to London?

    • Emma says:

      No. You know, Jlaw has a work

      • frisbeejada says:

        I read that far too quickly as ” Jlaw has a wok!” clearly getting a bit hysterical at the thought of all that Goop all over our Media (and the Brit media all over her) ugh – it’s going to be hideous.

  3. Esmom says:

    I don’t know if I believe this. I thought they left London because she thought LA/the US was the best place for them.

    • Liv says:

      Yep, me too. She praised the weather and the outdoors. Besides I can’t imagine her keeping her relationship with Falchuk then, unless he moves too.

  4. Mrs. Wellen Melon says:

    Since when does Gwyneth Paltrow care about education?

    • Esmom says:

      I don’t know her real thoughts on education but I know plenty of people who care about image, and often choosing only the best schools factor into that.

    • L says:

      I agree. All these celebrities claim they want ‘the best education’ for their children, but half of them never finished college.

      • Esmom says:

        When you put it that way, how is it bad for a parent to want more for their child than they had? Can’t fault a person for wanting their children to be more educated than they were…maybe Goop regrets that and wants to make sure her kids don’t have similar regrets.

      • Emma - The JP Lover says:

        @Esmom …

        Gwyneth went to a private Boarding school herself. This is all about prestige with her.

  5. Dinah says:

    She may prefer Charon, so Pluto can endlessly adore her from afar yet so near.

  6. Fori says:

    I thought she moved because her kids need sun? The British weather hasn’t changed. It’s nice to see an actress without Botox.

    • ell says:

      obviously her idea of “needing sun” is quite messed up; just look at the amount of sun damage on her face.

      • Fori says:

        She got osteoporosis a few years back having avoided the sun for years so it’s a health issue. I’d take a wrinkle or two over crumbling bones every day. So many actresses look frail and elderly by the time they’re in their forties despite being ‘wrinkle’ free. She looks healthier now. There’s a huge problem with rickets and other health issues in kids whose parents have sun phobia, living in LA they only need a few mins a day without sunscreen to get all the vitamin d they need, it’s harder in countries where you see sun only in the summer!!!!

      • ell says:

        so are you implying that the whole of britain suffers of osteoporosis? and what about scandinavian countries that see no sun whatsoever for months? ok then. I mean, I can’t really argue with your logic.

  7. Peggy says:

    Why would it be on Gwyneth turns, when the man is not even divorce yet and seems to be in no hurry to get one.
    Why buy the cow when you can get the milk for free.
    Her movie career is all but over, don’t know if Goop is still losing money, so her gig now, is paid appearances and speeches.

    • Zinjojo says:

      That term, “why buy the cow when you can get the milk for free”. It’s time to get rid of it, it implies that a woman who has sex outside of marriage is cheap and it’s a shaming remark that is never used for a man.

      • Still Deciding says:

        What? That’s not what it means at all.

      • Zinjojo says:

        Still Deciding, then please provide tour interpretation of that saying. I’ve heard it all my life, and that’s exactly what it’s meant.

  8. Maya says:

    On behalf of the sane people on this earth – please get her on a spaceship and get her to teach aliens how to yawn.

  9. tracking says:

    Good way to scare off her ex’s potential gfriends. Can you imagine running into Goop in the kitchen in the morning?

  10. ell says:

    why did she move to LA then? she was in london for ages, and just recently moved away, idk how much sense it makes to go back? it sounds made up.

  11. Jules says:

    Hey, U.K…you can keep her!.

    Question: Exactly how long should it take to fumigate the U.S. of the Goopy stench?…

  12. Jules says:

    I also am beginning to believe that London has become the go-to destination for Z-List celebs whose careers have disintegrated.

    For example, Lohan, Goop, etc.,.

  13. lila fowler says:

    Her hair always looks dreadful.

  14. Ms. Turtle says:

    IDK how reliable the DM is on this. Martin seems as happy in LA as GP does. Also, why is it a bad thing that she’s now openly dating Falchuk? Even if he isn’t divorced yet, he’s clearly not with his wife. Chris has moved on. It doesn’t seem to me that Gwyneth is interested in getting remarried. Maybe she just wants a boyfriend. She has more than enough in her life to keep her fulfilled without pining for a new husband. IDK, I am a Gwyneth apologist so maybe I see things differently.

    • Neah23 says:

      They are not at all reliable its nicknamed the Daily Fail for a reason. The part were they say ” The house is big enough to live separate lives ” was basically a ripoff from Jen and Ben living on the same property. Which is what they do make up stories from what others celebrity do.

  15. Jayna says:

    Another bull DM story, I think. She couldn’t wait to move back to California when the marriage started going south. He not only agreed to it, he bought himself a home near her after the split was public knowledge. Her life and friends and family are in the U.S. She, like Madonna, is not going back to live in London. Gwynneth may have thought she would move back for education later, but her life is so entrenched in California, I think that went by the wayside. Without a husband to have as a companion, it seems like it would be very lonely for her, and too hard to still do little movies here and there with kids in school over there.

  16. Tracy says:

    Hey London? Tag, you’re it!

  17. guest says:

    He already dumped her, she is just putting a different spin on it. “Control Freak in Zen packaging” (Brad F), is thee BEST description of Gwynnie!