Ben Affleck’s nanny did a thirsty bikini photo shoot with Star Magazine

Christine Ouzounian Heads To A Hotel Amid Rumors Of Her Dating Ben Affleck
Do you know how Ben Affleck’s jilted lover and fired nanny to his kids, Christine Ouzounian, checked into the Hotel Bel Air right after news of the scandal broke and she achieved the infamy she was so desperately seeking? It was a stalkerish move, considering that she used to visit Ben there when he was spending time apart from his family. It was also a calculated move, because there are now photos of Ouzounian poolside at the Hotel Bell Air. The pics were taken by a cellphone camera, in fact they even have carrier and location information in one pic, which never happens unless you take a screenshot of a picture and who does that? The photos were made to look covert, but were obviously planned. Star Magazine has the photos along with insider details of Ouzonian’s moves inside the hotel. This woman has the mentality of a middle schooler. Read these quotes and try not to laugh:

Wearing a bikini, the sexy 28-year-old was joined by a girlfriend as she lounged in the afternoon sun — and thoughts of Ben weren’t far from her mind, according to an eyewitness.

“Christine was skimming through a number of articles about her and Ben on her phone, and she was even admiring photos of herself taken on the street by the paparazzi,” the eyewitness tells Star exclusively.

“Then she got a phone call from a friend, and the conversation seemed to turn directly to Affleck,” the eyewitness says.

“Christine told her friend, ‘He’s still in Atlanta [where Ben’s three kids have been staying while Jen has been filming Miracles from Heaven there]; I just got a text from him!'”

“At one point while she was talking to her friend on the phone,” the eyewitness adds, “without mentioning Ben by name, Christine said, ‘I didn’t want to go to the Bahamas, but he really wanted me to.'”

“Then she added, ‘He broke up with me…He told me he loved me, but he can’t be with me under these circumstances.'”

“When Christine was done with her phone call, she turned to the girlfriend who was with her by the pool, and they both started laughing. I guess she can’t be too distraught over what’s been happening,” says the eyewitness.

[From Star Magazine]

This woman just needs to sit down. Is this what the “crisis p.r. firm” she hired told her to do? Did they advise her to spend thousands at the Bel Air hotel, pretend like she’s famous and stage photos and insider quotes? Who is paying for her stay there? The cheapest room is over $900 a night. Somewhere, Jennifer Garner is hugging a kid and laughing at her ex nanny’s weak PR game.

As if that Star article wasn’t enough, People Mag has a new story about how Ouzounian is “coping”. They claim she’s doing fine, is “not naive,” is “smart and comes from a good background,” and is “somewhat sophisticated for a 28-year-old.” I have news for this person, WE DON’T CARE. You are not famous.

Many of you have mentioned various conspiracy theories about this relationship: that Garner set Ben up to fail by hiring an attractive-ish nanny, or that the nanny is crazy and never got with Affleck in the first place. I think this all happened the way she’s claiming and that Affleck was stupid and led by his dick enough not to see the warning signs. I doubt that Garner is that diabolical. (For what it’s worth, in this latest article Affleck’s side claims that they had “a work relationship and a friendship” but weren’t physical.) Given the way she’s trying to play the press and failing miserably, there must have been a lot of warning signs.

Christine Ouzounian Heads To A Hotel Amid Rumors Of Her Dating Ben Affleck

Jennifer Garner Keeps Cool On Set

Ben Affleck seen arriving at a studio in Los Angeles

photo credit: FameFlynet and Pacific Coast News

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

291 Responses to “Ben Affleck’s nanny did a thirsty bikini photo shoot with Star Magazine”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Katydid20 says:

    Is her 15 minutes up yet? Please? I really just want her to go away.

    Plus I doubt highly that Ben was texting her……unless it was to tell her to STFU and stop posing for the paparazzi…….

    • Lara K says:

      What did he expect?

      If a famous person bangs their employee, this should be the expected outcome.

    • Talie says:

      It won’t be up until she does a proper interview.

    • doofus says:

      I doubt he’s texting her at all…more delusion from nanny.

      he’s ghosting her, and this is the result. And I think that a call/text from him, regardless of tone/content, is exactly what she wants from her behavior.

      if he were, in fact, in touch with her with the promise of something more, she’d be laying low. her entire game here is because he dumped her, hard.

      • Kitten says:

        Definite ghosting happening here.

      • Lahdidahbaby says:

        Exactly. And really, if it’s all just about sex, this not-very-attractive Ouzy chick sure proves the lure of “getting some strange,” because Garner is so much better looking, has a better body, and all Ouzy has is the advantage of being “some strange.”

      • Shambles says:

        ITA, Doofus. Chica is an idiot AND she’s bat sh!t crazy. The gift that keeps on giving. He definitely hasn’t spoken to her since this story dropped, and this is her way of continuing to live in her messed-up fantasy world while simultaneously whining to get his attention back. It’s child’s play, and it’s really sad.

        I also love the quotes she slipped under a bathroom door to a People Mag reporter about how she’s “coping.”
        “I is smart! I is sophisticated! I is mature! I is not naive! See how wrong you were about me? See? SEE?”
        *crazy knife-holding music*

      • MoxyLady007 says:

        Don’t try and ghost a person with unchecked / untreated borderline personality disorder

      • Alex says:

        Definitely ghosting. I’m ready for her to spend all that hush money on “being famous” so she can go away. The realization always sets in eventually and she will be yet another gold digging crazy that got tossed to the side

      • Gru says:

        I’m not sure about this Ghosting theory. Who is paying the hotel bills? Also, Ben is not above making dumb self-sabotaging choices, we all know that. Allow me to present evidence of successful men making monumentally stupid choices over extended periods – I bring you Reille Hunter and John Edwards.

        Cliff notes on Reille: Senator Edwards got Reille pregnant while his wife had cancer. When the tabloids broke the story, the senator got his aide to claim the baby was his. At some point he ran for vice president. A sex tape surfaced. His wife humiliated filed for divorce and died of cancer that same year. And through it all he continued seeing Reille. Investigations began on whether campaign funds had been siphoned off to sustain the mistress, I dont know if these were ever concluded. Then Reille wrote a book in which she attacked the dead wife but Edwards only “dumped her” when the book reviews were scathing. She went on a media tour in which she dragged him too, claiming that the backlash was unwarranted since she wasnt his only mistress. The jury is still out on whether he actually did leave her. Yes ladies, Ben is just as capable of this level of stupidity.

      • laura in LA says:

        doofus, this is what I posted yesterday, and I’d also add that if Ben did “dump” her, he let her off easy at the good advice of his own PR people just to make this all go away…

        As I speculated on the last thread, this nanny-ho is not only delusional, but she shows all the signs of a Histrionic Personality. And there’s only one way to deal with these types: Ignore, Avoid, Do Not Engage or Escalate the Drama, then go No Contact – that’s Ghosting.

        Thank you, Ben, for hopefully putting an end to your nightmare which became ours, and now maybe nanny-ho’s 15 mins (or week) of fame is finally OVER. Woo hoo!

      • bettyrose says:

        From an egalitarian standpoint, I think it’s nice that an average looking person (by LA standards) with minimal career success and questionable reasoning skills can get the same trashy tabloid coverage as someone more interesting. #Americandream.

      • belle de jour says:

        lol @ bettyrose.

      • I Choose Me says:

        Ding, ding, ding.

      • frivoliy says:

        lol! @bettyrose

    • V4Real says:

      The thirst is strong with this one. She’s going to feel like such an idiot when her 15 minutes of fame doesn’t go as plan and she can’t even get a job as a dog walker. I’m sure no famous person will hire her as their nanny. I guess she better update that resume.

    • Mimz says:

      Please give her only 5 minutes. And also, who thinks being known as a side piece is the beginning of any career? Didn’t Monica Lewinsky teach us all? (Note that I feel sorry for ML never ending backlash)
      It’s sad. And gross. And shameful. Ben should just issue a real statement and distance himself for this attention seeking woman. Otherwise this will get really, really messy really really fast.

      • BNA FN says:

        I have to disagree with you ladies about the nanny making a fool of her self. IMO, Ben is the one who is making a fool of himself. First he denied being with the nanny, saying they had a friendship. First if all why is the boss, BA, having a friendship with a nanny who has been in his employ for a few months. What kind of a friendship could they possibly have in such a short period of time?

        I never forget what BA did to JLo just before they were to be married. He boned the prostitute/server who he picked up at a bar?. That was such an embarrassment to JLo. Then the worse part of that embarrassment was the person he slept with said that he gave her oral (after picking her up, not knowing her). She said it was not the best oral but it was from BA, how embarrassing. I have no idea why would Jennifer G ever got with a man like that and even marry him, just smh at these People.

      • Gru says:

        @ BNA FN

        I’m confused, why would his performing oral sex on the jump off be the “worse part of the embarrassment”? Is oral sex on women somehow dirtier than actual sex? Or do you view it as such an unpleasant experience for a man (most men I know, love to give it so….) that he should only ever have to endure it with a wife?

      • Triple Cardinal says:

        @BNA FN
        FWIW, I saw pap photos of Affleck years ago, possibly even pre-Jen. They were taken at a hamburger or hot dog stand that had seating outside. Affleck was at an outside table with a meal in front of him. He was with three, maybe four other people, all eating.

        One woman there was identified as his PA, and I thought, how cool was this, that Affleck would grab a quick lunch with his PA as they ran errands.

        So Affleck has a history of being on very casual terms with his employees.

      • Rice says:

        I could be wrong but I think BNA FN meant that the “worse part of the embarrassment” was that his “technique” wasn’t all that and/or he performed the act with a complete stranger who wasn’t just a one night stand but also a lady of the night.

      • Gru says:

        @Rice

        If she was referencing his technique then maybe that would be embarrassing because maybe it gives strangers an idea of what Bennifer sex was like. I guess. The second explanation is what is pissing me off, oral sex on men is pretty standard even for one night stands. Especially for one night stands. Even when the man is as big a ho as Ben. It just sounds to me like ‘vaginas are unpleasant places for men to be especially if the woman is not a snow driven virgin’ and ‘he is doing you a favor even going there’.

        The embarrassment here was that Ben slept with strangers and possibly even paid for it. Whether he went down on her or not is as relevant as whether she went down on him.

      • Wren says:

        I agree, Gru, the idea of him going down on a random shouldn’t be the gross or embarrassing part. The fact that he was hooking up with the random should be. Or perhaps the fact that he was bad at it, because that’s pretty embarrassing for the world to know.

      • Jib says:

        I agree with BNA. And I hate the way everyoneis talking about this woman, like she’s to fit to wipe Garner’s butt because Garner is a rich and famous actress and this woman is “just a nanny.” Sorry. Nannies add a lot more value to the world than people who play make believe for a livingand get paid millions for playing make believe.

        Yes, she was stupid to get involved, but can you imagine if Ben made a play for her? With the celebrity worship now, she probably had no chance. He’s rich, Oder and possibly charming when he wants to.

        So, yes, I blame him more. She’s stupid, naive and thirsting for fame. He’s scum.

      • Susie 1 of 3 says:

        Wearing condoms gives some protection from STDs. Oral? Not so much.

    • Liberty says:

      Hmm. Well, I suppose I think of Dr. Samantha Boardman, or writer/director Sofia Coppola, or 18-year-old Malala, when I think of “sophisticated” under 30.

      So, THIS, exactly–> “This woman has the mentality of a middle schooler.”

      • Wren33 says:

        “For a 28-year-old” made me laugh. It is not like she is a teenager. She has been an adult for a decade. She is almost 30.

      • BNA FN says:

        @Gru, what I’m saying is, why would anyone put their mouth on someone’s private path that they have no idea who that person is or whose penis might have been in that private part, a few minutes before you without a condom. Think of all the STD out there. All I’m saying, that was very dirty of him. You don’t have to agree with me, this is just my opinion.

        @Rice, thank you. You get what I was trying to say, if not very clear.,

        It’s ok for YOU to have oral sex with strangers you don’t know. I’m not judging you it’s your body.

      • Sara says:

        @BNA FN

        I think you meant to reply to the previous set of comments but I’ll have to agree with you here. Most people (if any, unless professional) don’t carry around dental dams like they would a condom. Ben, in his devil-may-care way of life, may not have even used a condom and if he had it would likely only be to avoid pregnancy. Fukking around on your wife or fiancé is bad enough but giving your SO an STD or two deserves major retribution.

      • katy says:

        Came to laugh at that line, too – “she’s not naive, she’s super sophisticated for a 28-year-old…”

        Honey, no. You are acting like a middle school girl who gets her friends to tell her crush what she did last night or will be doing this weekend, how she’s so cool and cute, etc. That flies right in the face of your own descriptors of yourself (she was her own source, no doubt).

        This woman’s antics make me cringe.

        Last note – anybody else getting the Hailey Glassman vibes from her (the chick that Jon Gosselin hooked up with for a while after splitting with Kate)?

      • Red says:

        Gotta say the comments on oral above made me roll my eyes too. It wasnt framed as health concern but as an “embarrasment”. How is oral embarrasing? Anyway, unless Ben has open mouth sores, condomless sex is far riskier. But even if the sex was unprotected that is not so much “embarrasing” as just evil. You dont do that to your partner.

    • Evie says:

      Why, all of a sudden, the use of ‘thirsty’ in every story?! I like it but it’s being massively overused.

      • elle says:

        I agree! It’s making me thirsty…

      • laura in LA says:

        Mmm, yeah, it’s kinda getting annoying, and it makes me actually thirsty. Hey overusers, have some pity for those of us in the drought states, okay?

      • V4Real says:

        All this going on and yall only complaint is with the word thirsty.

        She’s desperately trying to get fame for her supposedly affair with Affleck. She’s taking pap walks, talking to the media and putting her business out there. She’s probably hoping this will turn her into some sort of self made celebrity. She’s seeking attention, therfore she is thirsty. If a word should ever be used repeatedly to describe someone , it is the word thirsty when it comes to her.

        If this word annoys you guys, yall should applaud yourselves for not being aware of the excessive use of the word BALLS.

      • Bored suburbanhousewife says:

        These pretzels are making me thirsty.

      • Melissa says:

        It IS used too often, but this chick is the definition of the term.

      • frivoliy says:

        You took the words right out of my mouth! @Bored suburbanhousewife

      • Sunsetsnow says:

        I agree, but crazy nanny can be an exception.

  2. Izzy says:

    Wow. This is the starf—– equivalent of the bunny boiler. This woman needs better crisis PR.

  3. Alice says:

    What an unbelievably trashy tramp.

    • Boston Green Eyes says:

      IKR? I am starting to feel a little sorry for Ben. Maybe this will teach him to be a little more wary of jump-offs in the future.

      But, then again, he is a typical guy who thinks doesn’t think with the right head.

  4. Mia4S says:

    Huh, I would have thought she’d hold out for the Playboy spread. I guess bikini in Star is more “sophisticated”.

    He’s an idiot but she’s insufferable. This is why you stick to models and actresses Ben! They can be bribed with roles or they fear studio backlash. Amateur.

    • Jane says:

      I would not be surprised if that was next. Anyone have Hugh’s phone #?

    • zzzz says:

      @Mia4S Brilliant!

    • MinnFinn says:

      Comparing the photo of her above in the striped shirt to her pap walk in the white shirt (which was right after her makeover paid for with hush-money installment #1), I think she set her sights on traditionally British ‘classy’ WAG. If that’s her goal, then she needs to avoid Playboy.

    • Melissa says:

      I’m thinking something like Hustler, if that still exists. More than likely, she’ll sign a lowball deal for a budget porn and then flash her wares for free on Instagram. After that, I see her on the arm of Mickey Rourke or Screech.

  5. PHD Gossip says:

    And to think I was worried the Camp Affleck paid her to go away!

    • Dirty Martini says:

      ITA. I just don’t want them to pay her a freakin’ dime to go away, because seriously….how much more damage can she really do to them?

      Ignore her and let her twist in the wind she chose.

  6. jinni says:

    I’m starting to think that even if Ben offered her a bunch of cash to go away that she wouldn’t take it, because the fame she’s gotten from this story is priceless. She is just reveling in this attention. He picked the wrong one, because she is going to milk this out for as long as they give her a platform. He better start praying that a juicer bit of celeb gossip comes out so that the public will focus on that long enough for the interest in this woman and story to die. Bet he wishes he had the Dimples Parade at his beck and call again now. Ha!

    • GoodNamesAllTaken says:

      Agree. I don’t think this is the result of a “broken heart.” I think this is exactly what she wanted all along.

    • Esmom says:

      Yes. The fact that she’s hanging out at a high profile hotel speaks volumes about her motives. Most people who are heartbroken tend to hide out at home (where is her home anyway?).

      • Susannah says:

        It is reported that she lives with her parents?!?! And sister.

      • A. Key says:

        So?? It pisses me off that choosing to live with your parents is shameful in America.
        Especially if you don’t have a family of your own. Some people don’t like to live alone. Some also don’t want to leave their elderly parents alone.
        Here in Europe, especially in the Mediterranean, it is normal for kids to stay close to their parents, even when they’re adults.

    • Kitten says:

      Yeah this chick is as transparent as the day is long.

    • Wren says:

      I think her first goal was to be Mrs. Affleck or at least the Official Girlfriend, but then he was like “oh hells no” so she changed her focus. Either way, she gets fame and notoriety, but the first way comes with more money and a bit more long lasting fame. She doesn’t appear to be very bright, so as far as plans go, hers aren’t very well thought out.

      • GoodNamesAllTaken says:

        Right. I’m not saying she wasn’t after being his wife, but I don’t think she cared about him at all. I don’t think she would behave this way if she had given two cents about him.

    • Rice says:

      100%! I think this double Z-listed chick is aiming for one of those lower tier reality shows. I bet she’s calling TLC or Bravo right now. I could see it now – “The Sophisticated Nanny” (TSN).

      • MinnFinn says:

        Or “Real Spurned Nannies of Brentwood”.

      • Tara says:

        Oh no, MinnFinn. Now you’ve gone and done it. Why in the world would you dig deep into the Ancient and Accepted NekkidNomicon of Infamy and utter that most ignominious spell of dark power?

      • Tara says:

        Sigh. This is about the punctuation, isn’t it?

      • Trashaddict says:

        Oh MinnFinn, you are brilliant! I would totally watch that!

    • belle de jour says:

      That ENTIRE ‘article’ in Star Magazine was scripted – written by PR person, passed to editor as a no-brainer, no-work, already finished piece to publish. It even came with its own candids.

      There are parallel universes at work here: two mega-wealthy & connected bone fide stars trying to control the narrative of a high-budget movie… one not-rich-or-famous-yet rogue nanny trying to star in a school play with a different calibre of writers & supporting characters.

      • beanie says:

        But, can we just stop with the ‘mega wealthy stars’ narrative as if it is the end-all be-all of this crazy existence? The fact of the matter is that these ‘actors’ and ‘celebrities’ are overpraised, overpaid, and overestimated as some kind of aspirational role-models. They are just normal people in abnormal circumstances brought on by an unhealthy amount of quick cash, fame and misguided adoration. Give me a Stephen Hawking, Carl Sagan, or hell, even an interesting director like Scorsese over most of these vapid, self centered ‘stars’. An interesting mind is so much more fascinating than an interesting butt (yeah you Kartrashian).

  7. Falula says:

    Well, we care a little bit. We are covering the story/reading the story/commenting on the story.

    • Elisa the I. says:

      exactly, the stories about her have the most comments at the moment. Good gossip, that’s what I’m here for! 🙂

    • Kelly says:

      Exactly! Clearly someone cares as the story just keeps on going. I don’t hate on the nanny, she had an opportunity and she took it. Whatever.

  8. Luca76 says:

    I wish the nanny would just go away. She’s just so disgusting and although it’s a juicy story it’s pretty basic. As long as she’s pulling all these stunts Affleck and Garner will be low key and I’m much more interested in what they are up to.

  9. Micki says:

    “somewhat sophisticated for a 28-year-old.” …..
    I wouldn’t have guessed….

    • A. Key says:

      She acts and sounds 10 years younger, I’m embarressed she falls into my age group, ffs I thought I was an adult by now….

    • Jan Harf says:

      And 28 isn’t exactly young. Jeez. Talk about trying to make a turd a diamond.

    • Wren says:

      I was side-eyeing that big time. Nothing she’s done so far even hints that she’s “not naive” or “smart and sophisticated”. I mean, really? She’s just rolling around in all of this with a huge grin on her face, like this was her plan all along. And if it was, what a crappy plan.

      She’s my age, ugh. But alas immaturity and stupidity have no expiration date.

    • Merritt says:

      That part is ridiculous. The standards for 28 have gotten quite low.

    • Size Does Matter says:

      I guess we have officially extended childhood another 10 years, unless you’re Kardashian/Jenner, and then it was backed up to 15. What a bizarre world we live in.

      Thirsty McLousyNanny can’t possibly believe she’s going to come out of this a winner, right?

    • laura in LA says:

      Key word there is “somewhat”…meaning “not at all”.

    • Micki says:

      I agree with you all- the standarts have shifted (to borrow from Jada) and the expectations are very low nowadays.
      I find it unfair towards all yound people, who try to guide their life and carve their own path and who don’t rely on high profile fling to advance in life.

      On another topic- It is my personal feeling, that it was Garner’s trap and Ben fell promptly into it. With all the rumors about his fidelity to hire young, hot nanny…in her shoes I wouldn’t tempt my husband, unless I’ve decided to have his head (or both of them).

      • Amy says:

        I agree. With his sleazeball reputation, there’s no way in hell I would ever hire a nanny that looked like that. I would have only hired a nanny that looked like Mrs. Doubtfire or worse.

  10. Tiffany says:

    This is the gift that really keeps on giving.

    Like what happens to you after having sex if Ben Affleck…HEY OH!

    Don’t forget to tip your server on the way out.

  11. serena says:

    Smart, surely isn’t the first word that comes to mind when thinking about her.. She’s really and idiot. While Ben comes out of it looking like the scumbag he is.

  12. FLORC says:

    This girl is hilarious! And she’s playing it all wrong. So wrong.
    Even worse this is making Ben look terrible.

    Just wait. The reality show shopping and thirsty pap calls are around the corner.

    Nothing about her says sophistication or intelligent. Because she apears to have no remourse in breaking up a marriage of her employers or selling these tidbits i’m going to laugh at this disaster.

    • PHD Gossip says:

      She did not break up their marriage. It was poor judgment on both their parts, but they were ovah!

      • Kitten says:

        Agreed. The marriage was dead before she came along. People need to remember that Ben and Jen were already separated at that point. Doesn’t excuse the behavior of both of these people, though.

    • The Original G says:

      It’s BEN that seems to have no remorse over the breakup of his marriage. How did she break it up? She’s a late addition to this farce.

      So, much for that Bahamian uncoupling performance a few weeks back. Not only does Ben look terrible. He is terrible.

      • The other paige says:

        So on point OG!
        He is terrible.
        And really, just last month about 200K in P.R.
        Ben is really a really stupid. And how horny are men??

      • Ana says:

        @the other Paige
        He went to Puerto Rico for sex? Did I understand it right?

    • FLORC says:

      Fair points. This marriage was suffering for years and the rumors of cheating were around even before the marriage.
      I meant that more as a straw that broke the camel’s back. And I think it was. The divorce was coming, but taking into account this girls behavior i’m wonderng if it was this… flamboyant(?) when still employed as the nanny.
      Also, not meaning to put all cause on her. She didn’t take Ben’s free will from him.

    • laura in LA says:

      So, according to one of her “friends” again, she was “playing hard to get”…

      Oh, is THAT what she was doing, by blabbing to the tabs, hanging out at the Bel-Air and singing “Call Me Maybe” to Ben? Huh.

      As I posted yesterday, one of her former friends, apparently the only one of them with any perspective, said: “If she want(s) to maintain a relationship with Ben, then why say a word?”

      Well, now we know, the only “relationship” this fame-ho wants to maintain is with the paps, tabloids and her delusional self.

  13. Crocuta says:

    I guess a lesson to be learnt is: Do not hire a young (attractive) nanny if you’re a celebrity. They often are just after their 15 minutes of fame.

    I’d hire a middle-aged nanny if I could afford it. I suspect a woman with a longer career in babysitting is better with children. Experiences do matter.

    • lisa2 says:

      I think they hire a younger woman because they think she would be able to be more active with the children.

    • Snowflake says:

      So middle aged nannies never have sex with their employers? If a man has a wandering dick, attractiveness often doesn’t matter. A hole is a hole.

      • FLORC says:

        What about Arnold/Maria’s maid? She was not a spring chicken. Sometimes it’s just about something different.

      • beanie says:

        ‘A hole is a hole.’ That made me laugh, thank you Snowflake. This is so very basic and probably true!

    • Crocuta says:

      Snowflake: I was talking about their experience with children, not their sex appeal. Sure they can also have affairs, some middle-aged women are very hot.

      But I only made the connection because there’s so many stories about employees trying to get (additional) money or 15 minutes of fame by jumping to bed with the celebrity they’re working for. Most of these employees are young. So it’s a pattern that can be avoided. Nothing guarantees fidelity with older staff, but it does increase the chances.

    • Crumpet says:

      I’d hire a male nanny to be honest.

      Ben is the one who cheated here, let’s not forget the man’s responsibility. Women have so little power, especially if they are a ‘nobody’ in Hollywood, it is not hard to understand why she is working with what she has as hard as she can. Oldest story in the book. And my first instincts were right: She is not a smart woman.

      • Crocuta says:

        Sure, the cheater always carries the biggest portion of responsibility, I agree. And Ben cannot shift the blame to the nanny. He betrayed his wife and his family, she betrayed the children she was supposed to take care of and her employer and friend (if that was her relationship with Garner). Both are guilty, each in their own way.

        That being said, if I were a celebrity’s wife (har har), I’d be sight-eyeing the young staff. Too many cases like this going on. I can (try to) trust my husband, after all I’m supposed to know him, but the young employees are outside of my reach.

    • Ronda says:

      i agree with Crocuta. its not about the cheating, if someone wants to cheat and has that status and good looks they will find someone if its not the Nanny, but the point about chasing fame that Crocuta made is very good. a young woman is way more likely to chase that dream than an older one, especially because her generation grew with the dream of being “famous” instead of working hard.
      same goes for a male nanny if the guy is young i’d stay away from that too and its not like women never have affairs with the people working for them.

      so the cheating is Bens fault obviously but you never know someone like her could have easily set them all up even if nothing happened only to get her little bit of attention.

      • beanie says:

        ‘especially because her generation grew with the dream of being “famous” instead of working hard.’ Yes yes yes!! plus a million

    • CL says:

      An unattractive nanny worked really well for Maria Shriver. Men don’t care.

      • Keaton says:

        Yep. I agree with the poster above that said it’s probably more about the strange for Ben. I think we’ve all seen this happen before. You wonder “Why would he cheat with HER when he has a beautiful wife/girlfriend/partner at home?”
        He likes the risk.
        He likes being with someone different.
        He likes the ego boost she gives him.
        She offered herself, he took it.
        It felt simpler and easier with someone he has no history with Yadda yadda yadda
        Cheaters will cheat. The relative attractiveness of the other party may not play a big role in it.

    • MinnFinn says:

      Crocuta, I politely but vehemently disagree. The more important lesson is ‘don’t have children with a serial philanderer’. There’s a lot of reprehensible behavior going way back in the Affleck Garner union. Yeah Ben cheated and there’s never an excuse for that. And to be sure, I am not in any way claiming it’s Garner’s fault that Ben cheated. But I also believe Garner is guilty of reckless behavior in starting a family with BA.

      • Crocuta says:

        I am not that familiar with Affleck’s life. Was he a cheater before her as well?

        And well, people get blinded by love. Also, some people grow out of their philandering phase. Some enter it as mid-live crisis or just because. There’s no big rule here.

  14. Jem says:

    I just keep wondering how many of these really stupid, compulsive hookups Affleck has REALLY had over the years? I think he’s a serial cheater, and maybe banging the nanny was the boldest of the bunch, but i am quite sure she wasn’t the only one.

    • Artemis says:

      Wait for it. It always come out. People are followers, his other jumpoffs who hopefully didn’t sign a confidentiality agreement will come crawling out of the woodwork.

      • captain says:

        I wouldn’t mind the truth. But this situation , even though totally hilarious in the beginning, is getting on my nerves now. This nanny is so unlikable that she diverted the hate that rightfully belongs to Affleck to herself. Exactly like Monica Lewinsky. Look at Clinton, he’s totally okay. And Monica? She is ruined till this day! Even though for her it was just one man, she was young anf silly, and he was doing it for ages, and other women came forward with their stories too.

        When someone has a powerful PR, he can deliberatly manipulate the press and blogs. And then everyone will be saying what an ass Ben is, but more like, yeah, nothing new here. Because the real scorn and humiliation will be already spent on the nanny. She is the sacrificial cow here.

    • platypus says:

      I’m sure he has a lot of pay-offs coming his way… Someone would have to be even dumber than this girl to take her lead, and that’s hard to imagine.

    • Wren says:

      I’m guessing a lot. He’s been caught before, and acted like it wasn’t that big a deal, pointing to the fact that for him it was business as usual. He was just “unfortunate” enough to pick an excessively thirsty one this time that will NOT go away. Oh well, hard cheese for him.

    • delorb says:

      I’m wondering why get married at all? He and Jennifer could have had the kids without the ring. Or he could have stayed single. A ring won’t help you keep it in your pants. As for the nanny, she should get with any of the Tiger Woods ‘help’ in plotting her next move. I’m sure they’re just rolling in dough and/or starring in their own TV show. Oh wait.

      • Red says:

        Ben married her because he wanted to be taken seriously. He was a tabloid persona so the serious indies didnt want him and he who was not delivering in the box office so the studios didnt want him either. See, Leo can kind of get away with the playboy thing because he brings audiences and people believe he is talented (although you could argue that the playboy thing is keeping him from the Oscar). Nobody in Hollywood was going to trust pre-Garner Ben with the money to make Gone Baby, Gone or The Town.

      • Ana says:

        @Red

        You are on point re Leo and Ben. Plus Ben has 3 small, adorable and beautiful kids. They are the victims. He should be ashamed. What a selfish prick!

        Yes, Leo is not getting his Oscars because of his playboy rep.

      • Beth No. 2 says:

        The majority of AMPAS voters are old white males who have spent a long time in the entertainment industry and some of whom are no angels themselves. I doubt they’d find Leo’s modelising so reprehensible. After all they repeatedly nominate him for the honours. He hasn’t won because he has faced better competition each time.

    • Isabelle says:

      Boy did Ben f* this one up. Stupid beyond belief to sleep with the nanny.

  15. lisa2 says:

    The pictures look like they were taken by someone staying at the hotel and they sold them to STAR.. thing is everyone is a pap now and the average woman or man takes pictures of celebs (no she is not a celeb) and sell them to tabloids. I have seem people tweeting pictures where they saw a celebrity somewhere then immediately you see a tabloid tweet that person to give them access to the pictures or give them more information. I don’t know if she called them; I’m just making the point that because of the way things are now; and magazines are paying anyone for information the pictures could be taken by anyone and she may not be apart of it.

    I find is so curious that she is able to afford this place she is staying in.. Who is funding her new life. She is acting like she has hit the lottery. Maybe she has something on Ben and he is giving her money.. which is a slippery slope. He should just bite the bullet and come clean. Cut her off at the knees. This becomes worse every single day.

  16. NewWester says:

    What is this woman’s end game? Ben is not interested in pursuing a serious relationship with her. The idea of her suing Jennifer Garner for wrongful dismissal is laughable( sleeping with the spouse of your employer is never a good career move). She will never work as a nanny again in Hollywood or anywhere else. Also any other future employer in any field may look at her actions as a huge character flaw. Enjoy your fifteen minutes, I hope you have some savings

    • Alice says:

      Paid escort would be the natural next career move. Unless she’s already there.

      • Tippipippi says:

        Escorts are required to be discreet. Johns don’t want their wives finding out they’re cheating, nor do they want their preferences and performance exposed to the world. Very few men would be prepared to hire her and no agency would trust her enough to take her on.

      • Alice says:

        @Tippi. Well, there’s always the street corner.

      • OhDear says:

        Kept trophy wife?

    • Crumpet says:

      She has a college degree. She needs to start using it.

      • Christin says:

        She’s supposedly had a bunch of ‘career’ changes already. She probably isn’t losing sleep over what her next ‘job’ will be.

    • doofus says:

      I really think she thinks she has a shot at (first) a reality show, which she thinks she’ll be able to parlay into some sort of screen career.

      however, even if she gets a reality show, her claim-to-fame/reason for being ON a reality show will always be “she’s the nanny that broke up (but not really) the Affleck marriage”. this will ALWAYS be the first reference made, and the first answer given when someone says “who is she?…”

      • kibbles says:

        She might want a career like Kim Kardashian. Despite how that family is disgusting, who wouldn’t want to get paid for doing nothing? This nanny might believe she could become famous for her affair just as Kim became famous for a sex tape. As long as she can remain in the public eye, someone will pay her to use her image, either in the tabloids or for some cheap endorsements. It’s disgusting but I guess more lucrative than using her college degree to do actual work.

      • Gru says:

        True. She can parlay if she is smart. Social media and reality tv has made it much easier for people to monetize notoriety. Speaking purely from that perspective, she is being smart by making sure that she remains in the conversation. She will need to a little bit more “thunder” though if she is to propel into a household name. Perhaps a sex tape? Maybe even a lawsuit? Or a tell all book or tv interview?

  17. Tippipippi says:

    She’s so pathetic, what she doing at the Bel Air? Hoping he’ll turn up at his favourite hide out so she can jump on him while her friend takes photos a few feet away. The hotel should kick her out before they lose their best customer over their tolerance of his bunny boiling, pschyo stalker.

    The comment about her being ‘sophisticated for a 28 year old’, you missed the part where the friend added ‘because she worked for Neil Patrick Harris’!!!!!!

  18. lesbastardsmiserables says:

    This shameless idiot deserves everything she gets. As in, when her five minutes are over and nobody cares she’ll find herself blacklisted from pretty much every profession.

  19. Joni says:

    So he’s still in contact with her? Welp…

    • alice says:

      That’s what SHE says. That’s what she wants out there. I doubt that Affleck would be so dumb to still talk to her. I take that back he IS dumb, but I want to believe that his lawyers advised him to stop any relationship. I also believe that this girl is going to leak info and will continue to show off until she gets the money she wants from Affleck. Yeah, I think she’s extorting him.

      • FLORC says:

        He’s been pretty dumb before. It’s possible.

      • Gru says:

        Its true that a rational person would cut her off but Ben is famously reckless about these things. He loves playing the risk. And like a typical middle aged man, he probably also enjoys providing for someone who thinks he is a God. A complete contrast from the wife who had her own money and knew his sh*t. My proof? Well, who is paying the hotel bill or the PR crisis firm?

  20. Lamppost says:

    She needs to milk this. She will never be able to find another job so will look to make as much from this train wreck as possible.

  21. seesittellsit says:

    Any woman who hired this one as a nanny in Beverly Hills was unconsciously hoping her husband would go for the bait and give wifey an excuse to leave. IMHO, Jen got what she was after when she hired this girl that all that counseling didn’t get her: the Exit Door AND the moral high ground.

    • DavidBowie says:

      ^^^Yes!^^^ Jennifer Garner totally set him up! This is the same woman who goes in front of law makers to ask them to pass laws concerning the paparazzi and children but she will coordinate a pap stroll with her children when it suits her.

      • minime says:

        LOL “set him up” “an excuse to leave”…you’re a funny bunch and fascinating. Do you hate all women or just specifically Jennifer Garner?

    • Gru says:

      Incase you werent paying attention during the initial divorce announcement, Jennifer ALREADY had the moral high ground as well as the exit door. All this incident has done for Jennifer is make it harder to be out with her kids without people screaming the nannys name at her. Also, this is hollywood where the waitresses are aspiring models, the PAs are failed actresses, the nannies are aspiring Real Housewives and the bodyguards look like action stars. Look closely at pap pics of staff and you’ll see the Affleck nanny wasnt out of the norm.

    • L, that's all says:

      OMG, you may be right! Brilliant…and she gets to look like the good guy!

  22. alice says:

    It was written that the room at the Hotel Bel Air has been paid by Affleck, he probably paid for it for a long period of time, maybe a year. So she’s staying in that room, she’s not paying a penny. As for the PR’s crisis manager, it’s not other than a handler that is in charge of selling the info as “sources” there’s no management of this mess, it’s all just a trashy and stupid famewh*re

    • Jayna says:

      No. He wouldn’t allow her to stay there after she sold the story. After their last rendezvous on the 17th, where she set up the pap, he sent his assistant to get the key to his SUV from her at her house, distancing himself from her. Like he is really going to be associated with her by her staying at his villa at the hotel now with all the stories out there from her “sources.” No way. She showed up there on her own renting her own room.

      • alice says:

        Well, that would make sense. He’s been dumb enough to hook up with her in the first place. But, no shade just genuine curiosity, how do you know those details about Affleck’s assistant and the SUV keys?

      • laura in LA says:

        Phew! Well, that’s good, but yes, where did you read that about the assistant retrieving the keys? Can you imagine having to be the one to do that, given how crazy this chick seems…

        It’s scary to think that this stalker is still lurking around LA because even though Ben supposedly “dumped” her, she’s probably delusional enough to think he wants her bad.

      • Jayna says:

        @Alice and Laura, it was in the US Weekly print magazine I picked up. In that article it said the day after their little two-hour “date” at his rental house he had backtracked and said he was worried about her privacy and being torn apart in the public eye and that he “dispensed his assistant to her house to pick up the keys to his car July 19. ” He was saying they need to be more careful and he doesn’t want her to get hurt. That was the day after their rendezvous.

        In the article, it had said that after she was fired and back in LA and he was going back and forth between LA and Atlanta, that he had given her the keys to three different cars of his for her to use, but that the sedan was her ride of choice.

        I said SUV because I thought she was in an SUV that night when they said she was in Affleck’s Lexus. I can’t tell because the photos are so dark. But I looked back in the article, and it was a Lexus sedan.

      • alice says:

        Thank you Jayna!

  23. D says:

    Is Star Magazine and Radar the same thing? When I click on the Star Magazine link I end up on Radar Online.

  24. A. Key says:

    She is what we all think she obviously is, but Affleck… Man, Affleck really came out looking PATHETIC after all of this. He cheated on Garner with THIS?!? How many brain cells does he have exactly?? God if he fell for this piece of trash then he really is the lowest a-hole cliche there is…

    • Obsidian says:

      My take is Affleck was probably high on drugs at the time he hooked up with the nanny. Anybody would do.

      • Crumpet says:

        Right, let’s absolve him of any responsibility here.

        Remember who Arnold Schwarzenegger was hooking up with while married to the beautiful Maria?

      • Obsidian says:

        Not absolving him at all. Just my theory on the question: why her? Arnold’s a total d-bag too.

      • Crumpet says:

        Sorry. I guess I read it wrong. There are lots of reasons someone would cheat on their spouse, but no excuses. If Jen takes Ben back after this, I will lose all respect for her!

      • beanie says:

        Actually, Crumpet, Maria Shriver looks like a praying mantis. Just my take. And, no I don’t hate her or all women. 😉

    • kibbles says:

      The sad truth is that many married men would have had sex with this nanny. Just because she is a horrible person doesn’t mean men would not line up to get a taste of that. Most men would be willing to sleep with any relatively attractive woman in her 20s and 30s. No surprises there.

    • delorb says:

      Most men won’t say ‘no’ when asked. They could be married to the best woman in the world and most would still cheat. Not saying its not his fault if he said ‘yes’, just saying that many wouldn’t think twice about the consequences or who they’re married to.

  25. stacey says:

    These are not flattering pictures.

    Not only is he a cheater, he’s cheap too. If he would have paid her off well, she wouldn’t bother staging photo ops and leaking stories to the press. He is so stupid.

  26. Obsidian says:

    She’s really milking it! Nanny hit the jackpot.

  27. CidySmiley says:

    This girl makes me want to take a shower. I feel so.. grossed out by her. I would not be able to show my face if this had happened to me. She thinks that she’s going to come out on top for some weird reason, she’s the psycho chick we’ve been watching in lifetime movies that we didn’t think existed!

    Meanwhile Jen is either extremely embarrassed or soaking this shit right up.

    • Alice says:

      I hope Jennifer is having a great time in Atlanta, eating at some of the great restaurants, visiting the Decatur Farmer’s Market, taking the kids to one of the parks. It’s a great city, though generally hot as Hades at this time.

      • The Original Mia says:

        It’s 95 today. I hope she is taking advantage of all the great restaurants and fun stuff for the kids. She did nothing wrong. Ben’s douchecanoe rep is no longer her problem. She just needs to concentrate on her kids and her career and let him sink or swim.

  28. Saywhatwhen says:

    Us gossip-faced trolls are being schooled by Ben and Jen…

  29. Sarah says:

    This is so funny and yes, the girl is a thirsty tramp. But Ben SOOOOO deserves this. I don’t think Jen set him up but it would be so cool if she did. Like “I’m going to hire a cute nanny and just sit back and let this play out.” I wish she were that diabolical. If she were, Ben would deserve that too.

  30. Merritt says:

    Did he dump her because she insisted on wearing that hideous belt? Probably not, but that belt is so annoying. I realize these are the same pictures that we’ve been seeing, but that belt is just awful.

  31. 313girl says:

    She is probably on the phone with Gloria Allred and they’re scheduling their press conference.

  32. Barbara says:

    She reminds me of Amber Heard less the little talent..I wish Jennifer would give her a good old fashioned beat down just for the association.

  33. Cara says:

    Wow. Ben and Tiger ought to get a cool pad together! Sound like perfect friends 🙂

  34. Heat says:

    She should go on Maury:
    Fameho: “He said he loves me. He begged me to go to the Bahamas, even though I didn’t want to. He just texted me.”
    Maury: “The lie detector test determined THAT was all lies.”

    • laura in LA says:

      I’m still calling for a Lie Detector Test, just for entertainment’s sake. I mean, don’t we all deserve that after what this fame-ho has put us through in the last week, now lost forever…

    • beanie says:

      LOL! Nice, Heat.

  35. Blueberrypie says:

    This is hilarious. Absolutely hilarious. And exactly what Affleck deserves. All those years walking around looking so dark and mopey and like he was above the Hollywood game- and now look. A fame thirsty, tacky nanny is dragging him down to the same levels as every other immature, cliche, middle aged, pathetic, horny man in So Cal. Bravo… just… bravo!

  36. Jaded says:

    It really is a sad, tawdry situation and Ben just added insult to injury by letting his d!ck do the talking during a very sensitive time for his family. Just the appropriate thing to do – pork the nanny during a marriage breakdown holiday done specifically to assuage their kids’ feelings and help them through a tough situation. He’s an A-class a$$hole and selfish d-bag.

  37. Ming says:

    The nanny looks stupid in her swimsuit.

  38. kri says:

    Amazing. This woman is going for everything she can get. I will give her this-as gross as Commander Famewhore is, she isn’t backing down. I guess Ben and his d!ck never really saw this one coming.

  39. byland says:

    “Somewhat sophisticated for a 28-year-old.”

    Really? I turn 28 in just under two weeks time. It’s nice to know the bar has been lowered so dramatically. It’s such a shame to learn that I wasted all that time in school could have been put to better use for, like, say, learning how to present oneself in the most unflattering light possible. Oh! Or how to complain about being asked to do the job you’ve been hired to do – with your panties on and not in your employer’s front pocket, no less! – while keeping a straight face. That would have been a better way to spend my time than getting that useless Ph.D..

    Ah, well. At least I now know to make sure my daughter doesn’t make the same mistakes I did. Somehow I think Violet and Seraphina’s mother will make sure they know how to avoid repeating their mother’s mistakes as well.

  40. PHD gossip says:

    Slow Clap for the Famewh0re nanny. Doing a superb job of milking the story. Bet the Tabloids are paying the hotel bills (this story is great for gossip-it sells magazines!) . Much more to come! I hope she holds a press conference with Gloria Allred soon!

  41. Oozing, scummy thirst.

  42. Christin says:

    This story has such an interesting combination of tawdry and teenage type delusion. It sounds like a risqué Teen Beat article from the 1970s.

    In the next installment, we will learn how readers can enter a contest to spend the day with movie star Ben and his puppy. Runner-up wins a brand new belt.

    • Ming says:

      LOL, this makes me laugh thank you XD Can I have the puppy instead of the brand new belt -minus Ben.

    • Christin says:

      I really am having flashbacks to those teen magazines, even to the point of envisioning what the headlines would be. ‘Are you the one who can make Ben smile again?’ And the contests…

      Seems like they had little quizzes and lists to see if you really were a good match. Oh, to imagine what Ben’s would be like!

      “YOU might be the one to help Ben forget his latest self-created problems and create new ones! Do you know how to work a pole (any type)? Card counting is an added plus, but not necessary. If Ben gets a little moody and won’t return your calls, can you play ‘zip it’ and never utter a word about your special times?”

      • beanie says:

        Awesome. Teen Beat, 16 Magazine et al. David Cassidy, Donny Osmond, The Bay City Rollers (!). Thanks for the flashback Christin!

  43. Giddy says:

    “She is smart and comes from a good background.” That statement is in direct opposition to her actions. She wants fame, but the only fame she will ever have is that of a stalker famewh0re. She may think that her actions are Machiavellian, but CB is right, this is middle school stuff. What a fool Affleck is: this is the epitome of having steak and going out for hamburger.

    • laura in LA says:

      Yeah, what’s with all this “well-bred” BS we keep hearing about fame-hos and hangers-on, like this means anything. (What are they, horses?)

    • Maria A. says:

      A well bred person would have the ethics NOT to sleep with someone who was married with children – period!

  44. dippit says:

    Is it just me, or are the desperate fameho cycle & modus operandi approaches turning and altering ever faster 2014/15?

    I thought we’d experienced a peak (low) with Amal via Clooney but THIS one has thrown all the Amal adjusted calculations off.

    The former scale of ‘woman quietly going about shtupping a Star with no career boosting ———–>median———>Amal’ must now be recalibrated.

    It’s getting tougher keeping up… a lot harder work than any of the women (above ‘median point’) seem to do.

  45. meme says:

    Wow, this one really is the epitome of classlessness. Ben must be dying of embarrassment of her obvious deep thirst for her 15 minutes of fame.

  46. Tara says:

    How embarrassing. She is just loving the attention even if it involves a family breaking up. Talk about thirst bucket. No morals whatsoever. Ben Affleck cares so much about his image and yet he made an idiot move. What was Garner thinking hire this woman as a nanny? You always go old and homely, Jen.

  47. j.eyre says:

    So has she found another position yet? Because I am hoping to go back to work in the fall and the heir and heiress need some tending – it’s hard to find experienced help these days.

  48. jccw says:

    I’m wondering if her big prize is a baby Ben. Wouldn’t put it past her to hope for that, it would continue her fame/cash flow for years to come. I also wouldn’t put it past her to get pregnant (quickly) by someone else and say it’s Bens’.

  49. lavender blue says:

    Jennifer Garner is probably paying for her to stay in the fancy hotel. bet there is a prenup which states that if he cheats she gets more money..I don”t believe he hooked up with the nanny at all..she is a bit of a trashy young wasp and the whole thing smells of set up to me.

    • Red says:

      Really? Coz that sounds like a bad daytime soap opera where women are scheming devious creatures, one trying to trap a man and the other one trying to punish him. Its everybodys fault but the male person who actually stuck his genitals inside an employee.

      Now for facts. Jen was never contesting for money. They had each agreed to walk out with what they individually earned. Seeing as she is worth 45 million and is not spending her money on glam squads, fancy cars or expensive jewelry, and Ben is worth around 65 million, I dont know where the “she wants $” came from. Scratch that, I do know where it came from. That same sexist place where without an ounce of evidence all women are out to trap men and women are gold diggers.

      • Merritt says:

        Exactly, Jen has earned quite a bit from her own movies and endorsements. If anything I could see her wanting him to set up trusts for the kids.

      • alice says:

        +1. As much as I have reservations about Jennifer’s behavior, not now but for the whole marriage and the pap-ops, etc etc. I dislike so much when sexist arguments like “she wants his money” come out. Even if Garner gets a nice settlement it would be what is stablished by the LAW, what a judge stablished that she deserves for her and her children, because it’s out of the question that she will keep being main caregiver, like she’s always been. With Affleck being just a ghost, like he’s always been. Plus: she’s wealthy enough and she was long before she got married, and I hope she gets all the money she can get from that douche of a husband she had, and put it in trusts for her children. That’s much better than being spent in hookers, drugs and poker tables

  50. kai says:

    this woman being such a shameless tramp might actually work in affleck’s favour and get him some sympathy. He could spin it like it was a one-time mistake and the poor boy couldn’t know what a crazy person she was. He was totally helpless and just so distraught over his failed marriage. Blergh.

    • alice says:

      There is no way he could spin this mess in his favor. His image is damaged in a way much worse than the Bennifer debacle was

  51. ann says:

    And he thought j lo hurt his image.

  52. The Original Mia says:

    Screw a famewhore and famewhorish behavior is what you get.

  53. Cindy says:

    Wow. Ben Affleck really got the nanny he deserved. She reminds me of Leann Rimes.

  54. Jayna says:

    Shall we revisit some comments made in an interview six years ago bemoaning the time when he was a tabloid fixture and how happy he now is.”

    “He says, “I was no longer in control of my life. I thought I wanted certain things, but I didn’t. I got lost. I felt suffocated, miserable and gross. I should never have gone down that route or got sucked in to all the publicity.”

    “I was typecast as myself. Too many people weren’t getting past what they read about me. That was damaging. I can tell from experience it’s bad for you, and bad for your career. So I took a break, went away for a while and let things calm down.”

    And he admits he is much happier with his wife Jennifer Garner and their two daughters, three-year-old Violet and six-month-old Seraphina to look after.

    He adds, “Work has taken a back seat. My job is not as important as it was. Saying that having a family changed my life is a cliche. But it’s true – it re-arranged my life and made me see clearly.”

    Still seeing clearly, Ben? LOL

    • Tate says:

      Wow. Jen needs to pick up the pieces and move past this douche lord. He is a mess.

      • Ming says:

        This guy is total fuck-up, I hope Jen will going to finally divorce him and have full physical custody of her 3 kids, this whole co-parenting shit is useless, she is the only one who is thinking ofthe well being of her children. Ben can’t be trusted. It’s like there is two person inside Ben’s body.

      • alice says:

        I always disagree with those who think that getting full custody of the children is the worst punishment for a douche, Nope. Sad to say it but taking care of his children would be his “punishment”. See, men like Affleck would be grateful to give full custody to the ex, even if it looks bad PR wise, but otherwise he will be free to live his gross life without taking responsibility for his children’s upbringing. Hookers, drugs, alcohol, gambling and work, and recognition while poor Jen is stuck being a full time single mother and he gets to be the cool daddy who brings gifts every once a month! Nope thats way too easy for a douche

    • Cheryl says:

      This statement only confirms for me that he went into this marriage with Jen, very cynically hoping for an image clean up and a chance at bigger better acting roles.

  55. FWIW says:

    The nanny that keeps on giving! This is what an arrogant, never-ending cheater husband deserves. Ben had so many affairs that didn’t go public that he thought he was untouchable. He deserves all the public humiliation. Every second of it. Karma.

    I’m just sorry the kids and Jen have to suffer because of his selfish actions.

  56. lile says:

    Way to pick ’em Ben!

    • Jayna says:

      He only let her stay two hours, long enough for some alcohol, a sex session, and a little cuddling while whining about his marriage, and then he ships her off.. She isn’t even good enough for a stayover. LOL

    • alice says:

      Wow I was waiting for these pics to come out. And they’re quiet revealing! She brings him champagne, she obviously tipped the paps off, but what is surprising is that Affleck doesn’t seems to be bothered at all by the paps, as it was reported instead that he was mad at her when he spotted the paps. Nope, the guy sees them and smiles at them and smiles at her!

    • Illyra says:

      The photos aren’t exactly explicit. Pretty boring, tbh.

    • wendi says:

      Merci!! Are these photos at the hotel or his home?

    • morgfunk says:

      and you know she is the one who called the paps on them! Funny how she’s wearing the same jeans, earrings (too dangly and tack IMO), and handbag as the staged photos at the hotel to leave no doubt she is the same person. The same thirsty person with bad judgment. It looks like she has a blue birkin bag. I really hope Ben didn’t buy that for her. This whole affair is juvenile and tacky as hell. But then again, I never drank the Affleck kool aide the douche vibes have always been strong with that one.

    • Trashaddict says:

      The translation is priceless. Better than appliance instruction manuals from China.

  57. Ana says:

    The pictures are on tweeter but the Europeans are the only ones who are bold enough to tweet them.

  58. Ana says:

    I also think that this is just the start of a floodgate for Affleck. More scandals for Affleck will come out. NDAs be damned. Other women will think it is not fair that this midget are getting all the $$$ so why could not do and get the same thing.

    Have you guys read Lainey Gossip today? She thinks Ben or his team is paying for the midget’s stay at the hotel because she thinks she has something on Ben that is real big.

    Ben deserves all this and since Batman is coming soon in theaters they can’t afford more scandals but we will see.

    • Jayna says:

      No, I don’t think so. He wouldn’t put her up at the hotel he is staying at or was known to, where she says they have hooked up. He would put her up somewhere that he is not connected to. Besides she has a home. It’s not like paps are camped out at her doorstep. She alerted the few shots that were.

      • Ana says:

        I know Batman is not until March 2016 and no doubt will make a ton of money. I am hoping it will tank critically. Bad reviews and such…

      • Ming says:

        I don’t think it will tank but it will surely affected, besides he is not the only main cast in BVS, there’s hot Henry Cavill (OMG) 😉 and the rest. Fellow geek-comic fanatics don’t give a crap about BA’s personal life. Well just hope he can pull-off Bruce Wayne (Batman), some critics still can’t get over on his Daredevil act.

    • Cheryl says:

      I came here to write the same thing. It’s my opinion that the only way this woman continues staying at this hotel is on Affleck’s dime. My guess is that his team figured out that it was cheaper to give her some upfront cash and perks now than let any further news get out. They are trying to shut her up and have her stop shopping her story until they figure out what to do about her. They know the hotel will do a better job keeping the paps away than if she stays at home. And things may be further along in the relationship and Affleck is waiting for the bad press to die down and will then resume the relationship publicly. She said he made promises to her, maybe he did. Maybe she has texts and photos that will prove they’ve been carrying on under Jen’s nose for months (which is what was originally leaked) and it will make Ben look like an even bigger douche, on the eve of his big movie. She also might be pregnant, it would not surprise me, it’s what happened with Jennifer during their film shoot. Affleck probably doesn’t use birth control. So it looks like the situation is on hold until the different camps figure out what to do p.r. wise.

      • Ana says:

        I hope she is not pregnant. It would be so horrible for Violet, Sera and Sam. It will affect them psychologically. Ben is such an idiot. He is already blessed with a beautiful and healthy family and he wasn’t happy with what he has. He deserves all the scandals and more and I hope Batman will tank critically. I am just mad. I have to take a deep breath. Lol. Jayna help me here.😄☺

        But why put her at that hotel? There are other hotels that are very private even outside of LA.
        Something is really odd here.

      • Jayna says:

        Batman doesn’t come out until eight months from now.

      • Cheryl says:

        Their still doing a build up for it. The whole cast just did a big panel appearance at Comic Con for it.

      • Red says:

        Pregnancy would explain so much.

        1) The divorce. Bens cheating isnt new to Jen.
        2) The backdating of the separation. Theres plenty of picture evidence that contradicts the 10 month narrative.
        3) The reluctance to clamp down on her hard and/or pay her off.
        4) The lavish hotel stay
        5) She does have a thick middle in the bikini shots. Could be body type or could be ….

      • Ana says:

        If pregnant, then, does it mean Ben will be forced to acknowledge her and walk with her on red carpet events?

    • frivoliy says:

      Re: Lainey
      It is starting to seem to me that Lainey doesn’t really have much inside information. She just analyzes and speculates about situations as well (or not as well) as the rest of us …

      • Jayna says:

        I agree.

      • captain says:

        Totally. I used to believe she really has some sources, but now I’m convinced she just speculates. Analysis and intuition. So I take all her blinds as fanfiction.

      • jaya says:

        excellent comment – i think you’re on to something. Lainey resides in Canada and on her show The Social she never seems to have any “scoops” or firsthand info when she is dishing gossip. She merely throws in her 2 cents on news that’s already out there. I think she has great intuition and as you said, analyzes and speculates…she does this better on her website btw – I guess it’s easier to come across as well-read when you are writing v.s. presenting info on tv

  59. miac47 says:

    Ok- but doesn’t he HAVE to be subsidizing her? Because there is a whole other spin she could put on this story if she was upset that he is done with her.
    Headline: BEN AFFLECK PRESSURED NANNY INTO SEX! “He said if I wanted to keep my job, I’d better open my legs,” sobs former nanny.
    He probably better be careful.

  60. MrsBPitt says:

    This nanny is “BAT”shit crazy!!!! (pun intended)!!!! I really think this girl is a nutjob! What does she think will come of all this publicity??? In six months, she will be doing porn!!!! Nice job picking this one, Ben!!!! I really wish that Ben didn’t sleep with her and she is delusional, but, If he didn’t, he would be suing her, and I haven’t heard anything about lawsuits!

  61. Penelope says:

    Wow, she is something else. Good judgement you’ve got there, Ben.

  62. mkyarwood says:

    Lainey keeps saying ‘it’s Andie’ — Does she mean that Emily Ratajowski (sp) is his legit mistress, and this Ouzounian is some sort of decoy whose payoff is a foot in the door? If so, how do people live such exhausting lives? Yesterday, I watched Little Women and ate pie with my kids. Am I doing it wrong?

    • schmoopy says:

      I think she means Ben is actually still having an affair with her, but they want people to believe it’s over.

      • Cheryl says:

        I haven’t seen this film but it’s what I believe is happening IRL. I think they were in a relationship and she took it way more seriously than he did. Ben probably reasoned that after the Bahamas announcement he was free to do his own thing, including dating the nanny. I think that it was Jen finding out about the relationship right after the divorce announcement and Ben’s mistake of leaving with the nanny and traveling with her to the polker tournament that made things messy. My guess is that he figured he could keep the nanny on the down low and then bring her public several months later or dump her. He didn’t think about the whole thing blowing up in his face.

    • Christin says:

      Sounds like you had a great day, with drama limited to the movie you watched. 🙂

      The Andie reference could mean several things. (—SPOILER ALERT—) It could be the actress (which I sort of doubt). In the movie, Andie was the young mistress, but she turned on him when he appeared to be waffling (to save his own behind). Maybe the blind means she got mad and went to the press, like Andie. Which isn’t much of a news flash, actually.

  63. Illyra says:

    I don’t understand some of the comments about how she’s supposedly unattractive looking. Her attitude makes her seem trashy, which is NOT appealing, but physically she’s very cute judging from the photos I’ve seen. Yes she’s short with short legs, and is a little on the thick/fleshy side, but a lot of guys like that believe it or not.

    Oh well, “beauty is in the eye of the beholder”, “only skin deep” etc…

  64. Tippipippi says:

    Just seen the photos. Really,she’s just handing him something and he smiles. There’s no bodily contact at all, the body language is professional friendly or neighbour friendly, not even friend friendly, let alone lover friendly.

    I really wonder if she’s the only woman he hasn’t had sex with. The pschyo vibes are strong on this one.

    Or………

    Could he have set this up himself? Sounds crazy but he has been wearing his ring which he takes off in front of a crowd of fans and paps at ComicCon. It’s like he’s forced to wear it. Could this be his way of extricating himself from an ex wife who is controlling him using what she has on him through this divorce? The whole ring thing with them is so strange.

    • Red says:

      It was comicon though. He probably saw some cute cosplayers in the crowd, maybe Wonder Woman and Cat Woman, and decided it was time to get some strange. “My wife? Oh thats totally over, see no ring. Wanna get comiconed by the Bat later?”

  65. Jess says:

    My god, this woman is somehow coming out of this way worse than Ben, which says a lot. There are 3 innocent children involved, she needs to stop and think about what all this will do to them, instead of wanting her 15 minutes of fame, ugh. Good job Ben!

    • Christin says:

      She’s apparently shameless. And he’s not exactly the best example of good judgment. …. Which means this story likely isn’t over.

      And it is unfortunate that three children will be able to read about this for years to come.

  66. Justy says:

    She was a shoulder to cry on. They had a common dislike of Jennifer Garner. He was lonely: his marriage had fallen aart. I read somewhere “he had no one to talk to.”

    It wasn’t just sex. Men do fall for women who listen to them. I am not defending him. He was messed up & emotionally vulnerable. Happy people usually aren’t addicts. He needs help.

  67. captain says:

    I don’t see a problem with her belt. Or Jen’s shoes, for that matter. She is obviously a very pretty girl. I could never understand how people with a degree could not evolve and remain so middle school? A degree. She studied for it, learned a lot, had friends who studied too… Something Jennifer Garner felt so inadequate about, not having the college education. Not being sophisticated enough for her hero. But this is sophisticated young woman, right.

    • Jayna says:

      Jennifer Garner went to college and graduated. She has a Bachelor of Fine Arts degree and she also studied at the National Theater Institute at the Eugene O’Neill Theater Center in Connecticut.

    • Pondering thoughts says:

      I don’t quite get why a wife with a husband known for straying would employ such a pretty young nanny.

      • Ana says:

        @pondering

        Or it could be Affleck who hired her since she worked for NPH. Ben must have met her during Gone Girl shoot.

        They had a nanny who worked with them for several years before this one. I wonder what happened to her.

    • Ana says:

      @Captain
      Are you saying JG didn’t have a college education? If so, you are wrong she is a college graduate, very smart and came from well educated family. It is Affleck who is not a college graduate but very pretentious of being “smart”.

      JG went to Denison College. Check her wiki page.

      • captain says:

        Thanks, Ana, I didn’t know that. She was talking about not being educated enough to keep up with the smartest man alive, so I just assumed she was talking about college ))

    • Scout says:

      The nanny’s got a pretty face but she looks like a dwarf in the whole body shots. I don’t see what Jen Garner would feel inadequate about. She’s about 20 times more attractive than the nanny, but yes, douchebag guys act on their need for “fresh meat.”

      • jaya says:

        There’s no doubt that Garner is fit well-proportioned and photographs well, but I can see why some would say the nanny is the better catch (physically). She’s blond, curvier than Garner and younger. As for her height, Garner is taller than the average American woman (5’4″ is the average) and I’d guess the nanny is at least average height.

      • Scout says:

        Her legs don’t seem to be in proportion though. She looks 1/3 leg, 2/3 torso. She looks very strange physically speaking. I’m only semi body shaming because she’s obviously a real troll on the inside. And I think Jen Garner is far stronger than we give her credit for and is laughing at Ben Affleck for bringing this on to himself.

      • Jayna says:

        @Jaya, how is the nanny curvier than Garner? She’s extremely small-chested. She has thighs. That’s about it for the curves. She has short legs and a very short torso. I just don’t find her curvy. She’s not skinny, but that doesn’t make her curvy.

        She’s not 5’4″. She looks about 5 foot tall. She’s extremely short.

        Blonde? How is that going for her? Garner has gorgeous brunette hair. And Ben doesn’t have a type hair-colorwise. He likes brunettes and blondes but usually on the taller side. Jennifer G. is statuesque. The nanny has youth on her side and is cute. But bodywise nothing to write home about at all. But youth and looking up to him when his wife is over his shenanigans does have its allure. She’s something new to bang. That’s what she offers. That’s not who he will end up with as his next serious girlfriend. That will be someone gorgeous.

        This is Jennifer Garner out on the street on the way to promote a movie at some talk show this past spring, just a few months ago. I would say she looks very sexy in a tight black-and-white dress. Great shoes also for those of us who hate a lot of her casual shoes.

        http://photos.laineygossip.com/articles/jennifer-garner-17mar15-15.jpg

      • lucas says:

        @Jaya

        The nanny is a midget. She is approximately 4″11 to 5 foot tall. She is just a little taller than Violet. The only thing going for her is her youth but she looks older than 28.

        Where is Ben Affleck hiding? His birthday is next week. Are you enjoying your vacation?

      • Christin says:

        I would add observations about how they will likely age, looks-wise. Jen will continue to age well, both facially and body wise. She has youthful features.

        The nanny is at risk of looking dumpier by the year. And her blonde hair looks like dried straw in some of the photos.

      • Ming says:

        @lucas He probably drinking the rest of the champagne the nanny brought him LOL while humming the Desperado song by Eagles

    • Ming says:

      @Captain Jennifer Garner is college degree holder, she is smart and well educated woman. She even wish to do her masters if she have a time.

    • alice says:

      Having a college degree doesn’t mean being smart. Some of the dumbest, stupid and ignorant people I’ve met had a college degree, great jobs and made a lot of money.

  68. Pondering thoughts says:

    Put yourself in the nanny’s shoes:

    She will get no money from Affleck as she was only his “girlfriend” at best. She lost her job. She will have difficulties getting a new job thanks to the publicity of how she lost her last job. So getting some pictures is actually one of the best ways of getting some money out of the whole thing.

    @ #67 Justy
    Exactly. He wasn’t happy and he was looking for somebody to talk to. The nanny was there. I am not excusing his behaviour. Nevertheless neither Garner nor Affleck seemed to be sufficiently happy in that marriage. Affleck seemed to have his “issues”. And Garner seemed to be the one to hold on to the marriage to the point of unreasonable.

    Finally: Affleck could simply have paid her off by paying her more than she gets for the pictures.

    • Ming says:

      Sorry to disagree with you Pondering, but I don’t want to “put myself in the nanny’s shoes” I can’t imagine myself to stoop down to her level of stupidity. The thing is, she is just a convenience like any other women he had sex with. Man like Ben will say everything even offer you the sun, the stars and the moon to open your legs. Its just so sad that he got himself entangle with the fame hunger nanny.

    • annaloo. says:

      There’s a picture out that is trending now. It’s not really anything, it’s late, she’s getting out of a car and handing him a box, but she’s looking right at the camera with that stupid grin.

      • Pondering thoughts says:

        Desperation. Papparazzi shots rank pretty low on the scale of what an ex lover could achieve.

  69. Scout says:

    The article is so beyond amateur it’s hilarious. This nanny’s strategy is turning into a trainwreck. She’s going to end up on some very seedy show at best or get a book deal and sell 35 copies, max.

  70. kristy says:

    Wow.

    This crazy, basic bitch would not be recognizable ANYWHERE! Obviously one of her thirsty friends took these “candid” pictures of her, and both the nanny and friend profited from it all. She’s psychotic and hungry for fame.

  71. Tessa says:

    I agree with @Jib: “So, yes, I blame him more. She’s stupid, naive and thirsting for fame. He’s scum.”
    He is the one who had moral/emotional obligations for his wife. The nanny is a single free woman. Vain and stupid and just silly at this point but not having given a promise to anyone about anything.

  72. Original T.C. says:

    So Ben cheated with a striper while engaged to marry her and people are now shocked, shocked that he was cheating on Jennifer Gardner? Why because she is the perfect m and wife and J.Lo was seemed as low class? LMAO. Every shocked person forgot all about his cheating when he entered the contract..I mean marriage with Gardner and they will forget again when he gets married to his next paragon of motherhood. Look at how many cheaters in Hollywood were forgiven.

    Next people will be shocked, shocked that Ashton Kutcher cheated on their favorite girl crush because cheating on Demi was understandable. Apparently.

    • Aren says:

      Yes, J.lo got no sympathy, probably because she doesn’t have a traditional housewife image, which is very sad because even if J.lo is not a good person, nobody deserves to be cheated on.

      • Scout says:

        I don’t know if it’s her image per se, but her personality. She’s a massive narcissist and famew and everyone knows it. Not so much she’s trashy through and through. Also, she has very little artistic cred to her. I think it’s her personality and her lack of cred as an “artist” that makes people dislike her. Have you heard her “Oh Ben” song or whatever it’s called? It’s obnoxiously bad.

      • Original T.C. says:

        @Scout yes I do think J.lo has talent. I can’t do 20% of all the dance moves she does on stage and infact her original claim to fame WAS as a dancer from the TV show ‘In Living Color’. Those women could dance! Even her detractors give her that much credit. I don’t think she’s a good of a singer so I can see people not taking her serious from that point (but if being a bad singer makes people unsympathetic to you, Swifty wouldn’t have a career). She also is at least a watchable actress and has proven herself in a few roles. She is now an internationally famous singer, dancer and actress in her own right and know for her own name not as a partner/girlfriend/wife of man X. Not too shabby.

        Sympathy from the public for being cheated on really comes do to how relatable you are to the average woman. People like Jennifer Gardner and Jennifer Aniston are pretty but in a comfortable non threatening way. The average woman can imagine being friends with them and having coffee together. Women like J.Lo and Elizabeth Hurley are too sexually threatening to the average woman and some might even secretly be glad they were cheated on and “brought down a peg or two”.
        So when Ben cheated on J.Lo it was a thank god moment and woman can dismiss her as a serious relationship so the cheating is irrelevant. No fear he would do the same to Gardner because she’s not “type of woman”, she’s “just like us”: nurturing and supportive. I’m sure Gardner believed the same. That she’s different so he will have more respect for her. IMO, when a man shows the world what he’s really like, believe him and walk right passed him. Most men don’t change and no, it wasn’t his ex-girlfriend or ex-wife’s flaws that made him cheat. It’s pure selfishness.

  73. Div says:

    Affleck’s always been a d*ck. People always blame the other women, and in this case she’s pretty awful considering she was the nanny, but he’s always had a wondering dong and a not so nice personality. Remember all the shade he threw at JLO once upon a time? Not surprised.

  74. Jets says:

    This is such a hot mess…. Call me crazy but I think Ben and the nanny are still together and in touch and will continue this relationship on the down low, I don’t think they broke up, that’s what they want us to think, but this will continue. Sad part is that as Ben’s new girlfriend, she will be able to do all the things that Ben never did with Jen, Jen always wanted to travel, how much you want to bet that this trick will be accompanying Ben around the world when he promotes his movies and she’ll able to go on location with him when he works, because she has no ties, no kids, no job, she will be all his and for a selfish prick like Ben this is what will work. He will treat this woman better than he ever treated Jen, and probably love her more than he ever did Jen, if he ever loved her at all, the mother of his children, and that is really the sad part of this, he is “THAT A$$HOLE”.
    Jen wants full custody of the kids, they are all she has right now, and after this scandal she’ll have no problem getting it. That fluff piece on People today about her “sweet day with the kids this weekend” was nauseating, it’s like, yeah we get it Jen your a great mom, no one is questioning that, enough with the “Best mom in the word” PR pieces, unfortunately most people are interested in Ben and the nanny right now anyway, that is what feeds our thirst for gossip. Jen will probably not date anyone for a really long time. Meanwhile a few years from now or maybe even by next year, Ben will have fathered a few more kids from a few different women and will probably see less and less of his children with Jen, mark my words, that will what happen. I can’t wait to read Violet Garner’s tell all book “The Assh@le Father I Never Knew”.

    • Valois says:

      I doubt Affleck would make her his official girlfriend. He knows the audience wouldn’t accept it and being liked and respected is what he wants. (Besides booze, gambling and women.) I agree he’ll end up with a non-threatening, much younger woman without a real and promising career- but he can find all that in a B-actress like Amber Heard (just less thirsty).

  75. annaloo. says:

    There’s a pic of them together that is trending now. She’s looking RIGHT AT THE CAMERA and smiling

  76. iheartgossip says:

    Oh Men. Leave the nanny’s, and anyone else not your wife; ALONE. Ben should be ashamed.

  77. Loca says:

    The nanny is obviously smart enough to realize she would get fame and some money out of this. The new photos have been released of her meeting up with Ben. Still a lie Ben huh!! Just admit it and move on and tell Garner you just can’t be with her but start agreeing to a custody schedule. This marriage is a joke at this point. I’ve noticed the celebs always putting a happy face or front to their marriage is always doing it to cover up their real problems. Garner needs to take off that wedding ring she is not broke and Ben was hardly ever there anyhow. Just live your life and do you from now on. Ben is over it no matter what it’s time to face it.

  78. ann says:

    I wonder how the nanny would feel if 15 years from now her babysitter went after her husband while watching her three children. Then pranced around after sleeping with him like the cat who ate the canary. I wonder if she would like that.

  79. Tdawg says:

    Am I the only person who thinks this girl is full of crap. The only thing we know for a fact is that she was fired by Jennifer. Now she’s out for revenge. And what better way to get it by saying she’s been banging your husband. I know vindictive women, and how they work. She seems typical . She obviously is out for attention and to get paid. I am absolutely NOT a Ben Affleck fan. I think hes a sucky actor. But I think he’s innocent.