Daily Mail: Is ‘glamorous’ Duchess Kate ‘in danger of eclipsing’ Prince William?

kate1

The Daily Mail ran a story several days ago with the headline “Is Kate in danger of eclipsing her Prince?” It started out as snarky about the fact that several British newspapers edited Prince William out of the Cambridges’ Christmas card, just focusing on Kate, Charlotte and George. The whole piece turned out to be an interesting read though, although I think royal reporters miss the bigger picture: for the most part, it’s just women who are interested in royalty, and women are always going to be more interested in royal women because of hair, fashion, makeup and girl drama. It’s not rocket science, it’s just gossip. Still, I do think this report is interesting because it makes William sound like a grumpy cold fish. Some highlights:

How William looked in the Christmas card: “Crouching to one side of the shot, his eyes are fixed on George rather than the camera, his bald patch more prominent than ever. Not to put too fine a point on it, the second in line to the throne looks like a spare part; a gatecrasher in this lovely shot. No wonder, then, that two national newspapers gave in to the understandable, if slightly tactless, urge to crop him out of the picture completely and made it a holy trinity of mother and children happily posing together.”

Kate is glamorous: “The more glamorous, the more confident, the more photogenic his wife is, the more uninteresting and colourless — in some eyes, at least — William becomes in comparison. Ironically, it is middle-class Kate who looks as if she’s been touched by royal stardust — and it’s blue-blooded William who resembles a run-of-the-mill Sloane Ranger. Indeed, looking at recent appearances, it is William who seems to be the man who accompanies the increasingly regal Kate, rather than the other way round.”

William is less popular with the public: “William, for all his pragmatism, seems to have let his distaste of publicity grow and fester, hence his sometimes extraordinary complaints about life in the spotlight — including one bizarre statement released by his staff to the effect that photographers who follow his family might be mistaken for terrorists and shot.”

William is a cold fish: “It’s not simply the case that an average-looking, balding man will always be in the shadow of a wife as beautiful as Kate. One only has to look at his younger brother Harry — engaging, effervescent, instinctively charismatic and cheerful — to see that the issue with William is one of temperament. Like his father once was, he is in danger of being viewed as something of a cold fish.”

William’s concern is for Kate, not for himself, says one insider: “He is not an ego maniac. Any unhappiness will be out of spousal concern rather than jealousy… There is still just enough gloss on William as a result of him being Diana’s son, which means that though he’s the less glamorous one, he still exerts a certain pull. And he is good at one-to-one chat; it’s not all platitudes. People like him when they talk to him.”

[From The Daily Mail]

Obviously, I left out some of the flowery prose about how Kate always looks amazing and she never has a hair out of place, because we know that’s obviously untrue. But, what I said still stands: it really wouldn’t matter who William married, his wife would have always outshone him, just for the sheer fact that royal-gossip-consumers are mostly women and we’re more interested in talking about women, hair, fashion, etc. And my guess is that William feels two ways about it: on one side, he’s genuinely grumpy about the fact that more people are interested in Kate than him. On the other side, he’s happy because he still gets his way in almost every situation.

146273PCN_RoyalsChurch08

kate3

Photos courtesy of Pacific Coast News, Kensington Palace.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

139 Responses to “Daily Mail: Is ‘glamorous’ Duchess Kate ‘in danger of eclipsing’ Prince William?”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. susie says:

    if true, I bet William and Charles are having little tantrums every where! LOL!

  2. Runcmc says:

    If it helps, Wills, I don’t give a crp about either of them.

  3. ldub says:

    “It’s not simply the case that an average-looking, balding man”…. OUCH!
    “a wife as beautiful as Kate” LMAO!

    • michelle b says:

      Yeah, that was a BURN. LOL
      I love it.
      Besides the kiddies, the only members of the royal family that I find at all interesting are Harry and the Queen, but I adored this article.

  4. GiGi says:

    I think this mostly comes from history – Charles really did hate to be eclipsed by Diana. But I’m not sure William minds.

    • Ravensdaughter says:

      Word! I think she’s got William on a nice short leash, and the children are precious.
      No one will ever receive the attention Diana received for many reasons. One is that William is fiercely protective of their privacy and Kate is not as active with her charities, whatever they are. The other is that Kate may be attractive, but not stunning as Diana was.

    • crtb says:

      DeJa vous

    • FLORC says:

      Just called back to the day when William would put his hand on Kate’s back from the photographers were yelling for Kate. Once they yelled Williams name he would pause for pictures.
      Or how it’s more widely accepted William adores the simple normal life he wants from Kate and dislikes her being more than that.
      This is a reoccurring theme supported by actions and observations.

      Add on how he’s lived his life as the golden child I question if he knows how to be humble or accept someone he admitted to mistreating aka “testing” being more liked than himself. Who is then viewed as the bland and bald adult child this article paints. It’s not flattering

  5. Betti says:

    Well sky bill I disagree u’re wife is not glamorous and couldn’t outshine the inside of a freshly cleaned dishwater.

  6. Senaber says:

    He seems like the type to never compliment his wife. I wonder if he has ever been guiniunely proud of her and said so? She looks at him like a child looking for praise.

    • r-r says:

      Compliment her? I doubt it too! But, I remember he once compared her to a banana (yellow dress), complained about her nightmare hair and in a full room of people he anounced that she is trying to embarrass him. Every time he opens his mouth it sounds less like a banter and more like a passive agressive jab.

      • anne_000 says:

        There are photos of her in the yellow dress (which blew up to show her butt) in which her hair flew all over her head and the space around it. You couldn’t even see her face. It was very embarrassing.

    • carolind says:

      He said so in an interview a few months ago. I forget what it was about but if you Google you will get it. He said he was proud of the great job she was doing with their children.

      • FLORC says:

        The interview his 1st day of his copilot job. He has paid her compliments and insults. Just as Kate has done the same. Regarding that they seem like a normalish couple.

    • wow says:

      He has complimented her in public.

  7. Sure Jan says:

    Will should either let that hair go completely or go to a doctor or good barber to fill that mess in. He should update his wardrobe more GQ man of the year less random middle age guy. He’s still young no need to dress like his father.

    • vauvert says:

      His father was and still is a pretty snazzy dresser. Will on the other hand… Not so much.

    • Chrissy says:

      I agree. He should take some of the money that Kate is spending on her zillionth green coat, hit Saville Row and get some snazzy suits made. But then we would be talking more about how the new suits outshine the wearer. His personality is boring and the clothes he wears suit his personality to a T.

  8. suze says:

    The royal women always draw more attention and ultimately it doesn’t matter if you are just marry in.

    The power in the relationship stays with the royal. See: Lessons Learned/Diana, Princess of Wales.

    Also – if people “like him when they talk to him one on one”, maybe he should take on more royal engagements and talk to more people. Just a thought.

    • sunny says:

      I don’t think Kate is particularly glamorous, charismatic, or interesting . I do think that because royal watchers are mostly women, of course we would want to talk more about Kate’s clothes, hair, everything.

      I do think William seems to lack some sort of trait that draws people to him. For example, I love the Queen’s determination, her no bs stance, her obvious love of her people.

      In William”s case it doesn’t help that Harry is just so charming, charismatic, genuine, and passionate. However, I do agree that William does well in one on one’s. My mother(who loves the royals), met him briefly in ottawa a few years ago. He was working the crowd and she managed to drop her camera(she is TERRIBLE with technology and had borrowed my sister’s fancy new camera for the occasion.) He rescued her camera, and briefly chatted with her. He was apparently quite kind.

      So maybe the solution is for him to do smaller events and just work more? He works so little that I think it is hard for people to like him or see him in a good context. All we see is the petulant, entitled lazy child. I think he needs to get his shit together and grow up.

    • bluhare says:

      You stole my comment, suze! If he wants to not be eclipsed by his wife — which when you think about it is funny because it’s not like she’s bravely facing the masses every day — maybe he should actually get out there and engage!

    • FLORC says:

      Suze
      They also have greater struggles. It’s inspiring

  9. Kimna says:

    I am not trying to be negative, but I still don’t get the fascination with her. I don’t think she is attractive or amazing. She’s very plain, and bleh,..she actually looks like she is getting worse with kids, age and time. I feel like there are so many other “famous” people that are more beautiful and fascinating then her..where do I even begin,..and..honestly, they don’t do any good for this world..they’ve had no impact for positive change in any way, shape, form..so I don’t know why you’re always posting about them.

    • Jules says:

      THIS. They are the Kardashian’s of the royal family. They contribute NOTHING. And I’m sick of the posts as well.

    • wanda says:

      I concur. And I fail to see what’s so glamourous about Kate – once you take away the fancy clothes, hair extensions, fake teeth, etc., you have a very plain, underweight woman. As someone else said, it didn’t matter who he married, he would still be ecllipsed. William’s deteriorating looks don’t help matters any…

      • vava says:

        I don’t find Kate glamorous either, but I continue to follow her fashion situation. Mostly with the hope that someday she’ll get her act together. (stop buying so many coats and dresses, learn how to accessorize, and move into some separates she can mix and match for a professional wardrobe. Oh yes, and ramp up the work schedule.).

        And William is just plain UGH.

    • notasugarhere says:

      I think anyone who married Diana’s son would have received this attention. It has nothing to do with her as a person, just as the interest in him is only in him as Diana’s son.

      • Poisonous Lookalike says:

        I agree to a point: anyone whom Normal Bill married would automatically be of interest. However, interest in her as a person has developed, since she’s been so totally underwhelming in her role. All the buildup for her prior to the wedding just added to the chasm between expectations and delivery of goods (unless we’re talking about flashings of the royal biscuit—she’s got that perfected).

      • John P says:

        I think if he’d married Isabella Colthorpe it would’ve been way worse in that she would have been praised as being the next Diana and they’d never get a minute’s rest for being the perfect couple.

      • kayte says:

        @johnp – why???

      • Citresse says:

        notasugarhere
        Not only Diana’s son, but Diana’s first born. Thanks for responding re- HM’s arrangement of photos. I certainly wouldn’t expect her to change now for a variety of reasons; the biggest is: at the end of the day, she’s the Boss.

  10. CornyBlue says:

    Considering William did not really have the fame he does now till he dated/married Kate and is rightly a very average looking man, I do not see why not.

    • suze says:

      William has always been one of the most publicized people on the planet, from the moment of birth.

      It is Kate who achieved fame by dating and marrying him.

      • CornyBlue says:

        Maybe in Britain America ? No one gave a shit about him where i live till he was dating a ” commoner”

      • Christin says:

        I think William had the Diana /sympathy factors carrying him.

        He used to resemble her, but my how that has changed.

    • bluhare says:

      I totally disagree. When William was younger he was The Hot One. Hell, Britney Spears had a crush on him!

      • CornyBlue says:

        Again, I am not from Britain or America and am too younf to remember Diana’s death and i ams ure they were popular then. But not to the scale he is now.

      • perplexed says:

        William was way more popular back then when he was hot and had hair. I don’t know what the heck happened. People at the time were even talking about skipping over Charles and giving the kingship to William — wow, how times have changed. It’s like his popularity went down and people started hating him when he got married and lost his hair. I’m not blaming Kate, but he was considered likeable and charismatic when he was in university and had a full head of blonde hair, so I’m a little surprised at what’s going on now. I mean, I know he doesn’t do any work and that would effect his popularity, but he wasn’t doing much of anything back then either, and people loved him. I don’t think Kate has anything to do with increasing popularity because I think he was way more popular when he was single. Maybe he lost all his power when he lost his hair….I’m somewhat in shock they actually described him as average-looking, because no one thought he was average looking when he was 21. Everyone thought he was a stunner back then. Well, at least he’s not vain and is okay with his balding….but he was described as being so handsome when he was in university, and even when he was 25, I wonder how he feels now to be described as an average balding man. It wasn’t THAT long ago…

      • LAK says:

        Cornyblue: if you were too young to remember Diana’s death or teen William then you really don’t have a clue as to how popular he was.

        The man had twi-hard style fandom. Google news sources from that era. Heck, teen Kate had his poster on *her* wall. He had the double whammy of being handsome in his own right AND being the beloved, sainted Diana’s son who he strongly resembled.

        His popularity has completely diminished by comparison to where it was.

        And the BIG surprise is Harry. Apart from all the (wrong) rumours about his parentage, he was always overlooked. Apart from headlines about his bad boy party ways, most people always commented on how handsome William was whilst ignoring Harry completely.

        Perplexed: it’s the Windsor Genes. Same thing happened to Andrew. Peronality and habits aside, Andrew asthetically speaking very handsome before his 25th birthday.

        The Windsors are generally not a good looking lot, BUT where they occasionally produce a good-looking member, the genes exact their revenge post-25th birthday and remove the handsome completely leaving an average, plain looking individual.

      • bluhare says:

        No offense, Corny, but William was the heartthrob of the planet until he was in his early to mid 20’s and was much more popular then than he is now! If he was as popular now as he was then, this article saying how Kate could eclipse him wouldn’t have been published.

        ETA: Should have read perplexed and LAK! You are so right about Harry, LAK. I just saw some photos of a 20ish Harry the other day and melted. He was so bloody cute.

      • Timbuktu says:

        I was NEVER a fan of Diana (although I do remember her death, it was an international shock), and I didn’t grow up in Britain or America, and I still remember that Will was a big deal back in the day.
        In my personal frame of reference, he’s much like, say, Michael Jackson: I wasn’t a fan of his, either, but couldn’t help but be aware of him because of his huge popularity.

      • Goodnight says:

        Yeah, Will was definitely considered hot stuff back in the day (lol like, less than a decade ago). I’m about the same age as Harry so I was a bit young to be into William, but I know he had massive buzz around him. I was pretty young when Diana died but god, do I remember that moment and exactly where I was and what I was doing.

        I think being from a commonwealth country makes you a bit more aware of the Will-steria from the time, but it was definitely a worldwide phenomenon.

      • John P says:

        He was very good looking in his early 20s (and I say that a straight man!).

        I think he’s just got old and grumpy … happens with a lot of us (me included!). He also wears his expressions on his face – he’s no chameleon.

    • FLORC says:

      William was always the hot blonde prince. Look back to numerous pop culture references. And even a part in princess diaries as the hottest royal unmarried prince.

      He was on more radars then off. Hos popularity gaded with his hairline.

      • perplexed says:

        That fairy-tale movie starring Julia Stiles also featured a blonde prince, who was sort of meant to resemble Prince William.

        A lot of actresses were also asked about they’d feel dating Prince William. And there was the weird speculation about a potential pairing between William and Britney, before she shaved her head…

      • Cricket says:

        Just watched Love Actually and there’s a William reference in it too. When the father of the girl Colin Firth comes to marry, her sister yells to her something about going to England with him and ditching him for Prince William.

  11. NewWester says:

    I can see more stories like this as we approach 20 years since the death of Princess Diana. Next up will be an increase in stories of Kate, performing more official royal duties and creating charities.

  12. Barrett says:

    stories out of nothing! Yes women focus on the hair, shoes, outfits of other women. Duh!

    Harry does have more natural charm but he is the youngest and often even in non royal families the youngest is more relaxed and fun. Research proves this. More often more pressure is put on first borns. The royal family has an intense form of this bc William is in line to be king.

    Most entertainers, comediennes are the youngest. Billy Crystal, Jimmy Fallon…. The list is long!

    • Cricket says:

      Speaking of youngest, I just saw the talk show Skavlan on youtube where the guests were Adele, Jamie Oliver and Princess Madeleine and her husband. It was very interesting to see the dynamic and hear her and her husband speak about each other. I could never imagine Kate and Bill Middleton doing such a thing!

  13. Aang says:

    I don’t get the “Kate is so beautiful and William is plain” thing. Put aside her great coats and nice legs and she is fairly basic herself. Maybe she just photographs bad and is better in person. Plus she doesn’t seem to exhibit much personality.

  14. EM says:

    She’s not as cute as her children in order to eclipse them. Pretty soon she’ll look as haggard as her mother. Kate already looks a decade older than what she is. I really don’t get how people use adjectives like glamorous and beautiful with respect to Kate. To me she is just average and has a big bank balance to dress in the most expensive outfits, which makes a bit of a difference, but not much. She was looking haggard and exhausted even before she had her children.

    • Jib says:

      I think Kate is very pretty, or at least she photographs/photoshops well. I must say, I’ve been surprised to see some pics of her not photoshopped and she really doesn’t even look like her, but maybe they were photoshopped to make her look less attractive. Regardless, she contributes very little to,the world, which is why I’ve grown to have disdain for her, and her useless husband, too. I do,like Harry, Maxima, Princess Anne, the hardworking ones. Not the lazy louts.

  15. Karen says:

    I feel like the Daily Mail isn’t ready to call out the Cambridges, so they write sugary pieces and wait for the flood of negative comments (and high click count) to come in.

    I’m a bit shocked they even mentioned Wills bald spot and accused him of veering towards cold fish.

    • Olenna says:

      This. It’s the typical DM article written to stir up the masses, who invariably take sides either for or against the Cambridges.

    • Tina says:

      Yup. I actually think that was the entire purpose of the piece – it’s setting the stage for the new “gloves off” approach with all of them. This flies somewhat under the radar because Kate is being praised, but it gets the information out there about William. KP will know what this means.

  16. Nancy says:

    Hardly. While Kate is attractive and performed her duty of producing two beautiful heirs, that’s where her glory ends. She is no Diana, not even close.

    • FingerBinger says:

      There’s never going to be another Diana. She had many flaws but she was 1 of a kind.

      • LAK says:

        What Fingerbinger said.

        It’s a point often overlooked. Even by William going by the Palace statements issued on his behalf.

      • Tina says:

        Which I think is what the Palace (the Queen, Charles, courtiers etc) all want. No one wants another Diana. They couldn’t control her and she was crazy as well as charismatic.

      • perplexed says:

        I don’t think Diana was crazy in the true sense of the word. I think she was just more independent-minded (and I like Charles well enough so I’m not trying to cut him down or anything. I think Charles and Diana were simply mis-matched and that mis-match played out in front of the world). Kate doesn’t seem independent minded — she just does whatever William wants. Even if William cheats, it’s hard to tell whether Kate would be angered by that. Maybe she would be, but I don’t know if she’d really try to take control of the situation like Diana tried (and I guess failed).

      • aaa says:

        @Tina,
        Great point. As inadequate as Kate is vis a vis Diana (lesser in terms of charisma, style and humanitarian zeal) plus her own limitations and shortcomings (awkward, banal and gaffe prone), she has delivered what is expected of her as the preeminent younger, female royal (producing an heir and spare and garnering media attention resulting in mass-market visibility of the royal family).

      • Mel says:

        ” I think she was just more independent-minded”

        By all accounts (and there are a LOT of those), she was the opposite of independent-minded: she is invariably described as having been clingy to the extreme.

        Believe it or not, I have nothing against her, nor am I fan of the “royals” (not in the least), but I think her tantrums and “revolutionary” provocative gestures were just that: more or less childish provocations of the “royals”, obliquely to sling mud at them while making herself look good.

      • perplexed says:

        “@Tina,
        Great point. As inadequate as Kate is vis a vis Diana (lesser in terms of charisma, style and humanitarian zeal) plus her own limitations and shortcomings (awkward, banal and gaffe prone), she has delivered what is expected of her as the preeminent younger, female royal (producing an heir and spare and garnering media attention resulting in mass-market visibility of the royal family).”

        She’s only 4-5 years in though. Diana and Charles were still publicly fine at that point (even if they were privately at odds with each other). Who knows how people will view Kate when she and Wills pass the 10 year mark. I think the family was already mass-market visible through William and Harry as Diana’s sons — I don’t think Kate added much to anything, except maybe with respect to discussion about women’s fashion?

        “By all accounts (and there are a LOT of those), she was the opposite of independent-minded: she is invariably described as having been clingy to the extreme.”

        I don’t know….at the time she may have seemed clingy to me before I had hit 20 myself, but as I’ve gotten older I’ve wondered how I would react to someone like Camilla, and I’m not sure if I would have been ultra-mature about dealing with someone like her in my late teens/early twenties. Kate hasn’t been put in the position of dealing with someone like Camilla yet — who knows whether she’d handle it smoothly or have the normal human reaction of being irritated and angry. I think It’s easy to remain relatively stable when someone like Camilla isn’t trying to stake a claim on your husband, and your mother is there to tell you how to handle things (which I don’t think Diana necessarily had the benefit of like Kate has had over the years in dealing with William). Diana had her flaws and I do think there were times she could have listened to some of Charles’s advice, but I also think Camilla complicated things a lot for them. Like, why was that lady always around? Maybe the marriage would have disintegrated on its own anyway, but Camilla really didn’t help things, and I think Diana’s reaction to her was normal, even if everything else Diana did might not have been. In trying to get Camilla out of her marriage instead of putting up with it silently, I do think Diana acted independently, even if it did all blow up in her face. Like I said, I don’t think Diana was a faultless human being, but I think the characterization of her being independent-minded isn’t necessarily incompatible with her other traits, even the negative ones. The fact that she was willing to go out and talk about the land-mines issue when everyone was ridiculing her does seem to indicate some kind of independent streak.

        Kate has had the benefit of being married to someone who, for now, is faithful and sees here as his first love. But would she be so stable if some other lady was poking around? That’s a question she hasn’t been tested on…not that I’d want to see the question answered. And I don’t know if Kate is necessarily less clingy than Diana might have been — she rearranged her whole life around William, even dropping jobs for him, and she’s lucky (for now) it’s worked out for her.

      • FLORC says:

        perplexed
        When William strays or has strayed Kate drops bombs in the press/public of how long William has been away, who he’s with, and even his secret for privacy sake locations only immediate family could know.

        Factor in the dating years with William caught with other girls, how he “tested” her to know if she would be fine with his behavior, his reputation of cheating, and that Kate pursued him while he was in a relationship with another girl, I think she knows. All while rearranging her life for him.
        If she tarted to pull away from her decade old game plan in these situations now you’d know it was a true threat in her mind.

      • aaa says:

        @perplexed,
        I don’t follow how your comment relates to mine. Yes the attention Kate gets will diminish but it will be more of a consequence of her getting older and she will become part of a phenomenon experienced by other aging princesses and queens. A caveat, I predict that Kate will experience a second wave of attention when she becomes the Princess of Wales.

  17. Claire says:

    Green really suits her. It’s kind of easy to eclipse Prince Williams. He’s as vanilla as it gets.

    • Betsy says:

      Vanilla is a beautiful, subtle flavor. He’s just bland.

      • Janis says:

        How about Pablum?

      • JennaQ says:

        Lol Betsy!

      • Citresse says:

        Yes, vanilla is nice.
        On the topic of William’s understated fashion style, I’m giving him points. There is something decent for sure about wealthy men wearing old/understated clothing.
        Charles was/is always the more formal one. Charles would have worn a tux to pick up Diana and newborn William from the Lindo Wing.

  18. Kimna says:

    I’m really happy to see that I’m not the only one sick of these posts, and tiring of this “royal family” with tons of tax payers money and contributing nothing to society. They are not attractive and frankly, they don’t even seem to be good people. I can’t believe England even still allows it..
    I live this site but noticed it’s always about the same people and same things..kardashians and the royal family. I’m over it..

    • kaiko says:

      Yep, have to agree Kimna…The Cambridges are the epitome of status quo…obscenely average yet obscenely rich entitled people living their rich entitled lives across the pond under an endless grey London sky of rich entitledness…can we now move on to someone who actually gives a damn and is trying to make this world a better place? Prince Harry seems to be the real star, I wouldn’t mind just focusing on his gingerness and leaving behind Mr. and Mrs. Vanilla Moneybags and their generically cute offspring. (sorry kiddos, you’re photogenic but so are the other 99% of the sweet, innocent, chubby cheeked non “royal” children in this world)

  19. Diana Spencer says:

    Time will tell.

    We all know how jealous Prince Charles was of the media’s attention, and the public’s fascination with, the Princess of Wales, and how that turned out.

  20. notasugarhere says:

    “He is not an ego maniac.”

    The majority of his actions up to this point prove otherwise.

  21. Sixer says:

    I don’t know why they need to buff up Katie Bucket in such an obsequious (and clearly wide of the mark) way, just to give Normal Bill a slagging. Personally, I’m happy with just the slagging.

    Man, sometimes I’m embarrassed to be British, I really am.

    “the more glamorous, the more confident, the more photogenic”

    I ask you. Who the Jesus and Mary Chain are they talking about there? Cos it certainly ain’t Katie Bucket.

    I think I’ll bugger off back under my troll bridge now!

    • LAK says:

      Sixer: a thought……

      At some point a few months post-engagement, Normal Bill sent his goons to all editors and asked them to write ONLY positive things about Katie Bucket. Amanda Plantell wrote a hysterical article about it which was very much in the spirit of the command whilst being completely insulting to Kate.

      Now, supposing the same dictat still rules, but they forgot to include Normal Bill in the rules, so they are writing pseudo-complimentary articles about Kate whilst slagging off Normal Bill.

      That might be the lesson here.

      JLP ( the then private secretary) wasn’t too bright.

      • Sixer says:

        Well, if you put it that way…

        … I can get on board even with the Daily Fail if they are going to spend the New Year trolling Normal Bill like that! Popcorn, missy?

    • HollyG says:

      The article is a study in backhanded compliments about how exquisite her heavy eyeliner now looks, and how her perfect teeth have benefited from whitening treatments. And her “interesting tweaks.” It’s rather cruel.

      DM needed something to throw down the gaping maw of a bored holiday audience, so here we are. Will apologizing to Ralph Lauren? Yes, because RL is a high-end women’s fashion designer who would love to be associated with the most photographed woman in the world. The balding prince is cropped from the picture? Check the aspect ratio of the photo in print, since he wasn’t cropped anywhere online.

  22. rosiek says:

    Being a public figure is a losing game–the constant scrutiny, sniping etc, etc. It’s a gilded cage. I’m sure it has its own pressures that we know nothing or little about. Being wealthy is enviable, but it creates alot of problems also.

    Royalty is embedded in our culture–fairy tales, all kinds of media, its all very romanticized. The reality is no doubt much harsher. Of course the woman in the royal couple gets more attention–it’s women who buy into the idea of royal romance in the first place, of course we are going to be looking at her appearance, clothing etc.

    I consider Kate to be attractive but overly conservative, not glamorous. There’s nothing very trendsetting about her.

  23. Talie says:

    He has issues, but I don’t think his wife eclipsing him bothers him in the same way it did with his father. He seems happy to hide when he can.

  24. Elizabeth says:

    If William does mind, maybe he’ll start understanding his father a bit more.

  25. FingerBinger says:

    Kate isn’t eclipsing William. If anybody is eclipsing William it’s Harry.

    • bluhare says:

      I agree.

    • The Original Mia says:

      Bingo!

    • Janis says:

      Exactly. Kate is a simply following William’s lead. She has been trained to be malleable. It got her Big Blue. Also, like her husband, she is bland, uninteresting, entitled and lazy. Neither have any goals that don’t include taking whatever they can get and living a luxurious carefree lifestyle. Harry, on the other hand, is passionate, likeable, charismatic, down-to-earth and a hard worker who has found his stride in life. Harry makes things happen and makes William look bad because William expects everything to be handed to him on a silver platter.

    • vava says:

      Very true. Harry outshines both of the Cambridges.

  26. Murphy says:

    “He is not an ego maniac.”

    ARE YOU KIDDING ME?!!!!!!
    The only reason he has let her star go as far as it has is because it makes him look good. He knows exactly what to do to stomp her down.

    • rosiek says:

      Exactly, this is the ugly side of royal life–when one member of the royal family gets positive PR at the expense of another royal. Or when one party gets too popular and gets held back or put down. It’s all a PR/image game–a crazy life.

  27. Prairiegirl says:

    OMG it’s 1985 all over again! It’s like they dug up an old article from the archives and hit ‘find and replace’ for Charles/William and Diana/Kate. There’s NOTHING original in that article. At all.

  28. kri says:

    Daily Mail, please! The only ones who matter are Prince Harry, Duke Of Ginger Sizzleton, and lil P George, Earl Of Stomp. That’s who needs to take the throne. I’m done here.

  29. notasugarhere says:

    @Kaiser, it is mostly female, isn’t it? There are several male forum owners/moderators on the big royal boards. Order of Splendor has two fun male posters, Onegin and Artagnan, although the latter doesn’t post much anymore.

    • kayte says:

      Which boards are you referring to?

      • notasugarhere says:

        Royal Forums, Royal Dish, and perhaps some on Benelux Royals Message Board. I do not know if Royal Insight has male mods or posters, but others on here might know.

      • Hazel says:

        Have you ever read Tom & Lorenzo? They’re not exclusively royals, but they serve great fashion dish. Ever since their “Bill & Cathy Cambridge Go to Canada” articles, I’ve been hooked.

      • John P says:

        There’s another one: “Royal Gossip”, the website name for which ends in .de

        They seem to not let anyone new join, and hide a lot of articles in a secret place the public can’t see. Some of the stuff the posters do say should be banned … I’m all for a bit of gossiping but some of it is really, really nasty.

        The Royal Dish’s audience seem to really hate Princess Mary (really, hate being such a strong word but they really do). Some of the stuff on there makes me feel uncomfortable reading. I think anyone who feels that much hate towards someone they don’t know should get some help.

      • sandra d says:

        @JohnP – Just had a quick peek – they’re hardly sympathetic to Kate either!!! I wonder what some posters have said to merit the “warned” and “banned” messages beside their names?

      • FLORC says:

        Sandra
        A few of us here have been warned and banned there. I can’t only speak for myself, but I was banned for calling out claims of facts. Countering with links and info. Telling them their facts were wrong got me a ban. I’ve heard of others just differing on opinions and getting warnings.

  30. anne_000 says:

    The DM is trolling.

  31. Citresse says:

    No, I don’t believe Kate can ever outshine William nor can William ever outshine Kate. They are a good match in many ways much the same as Charles and Camilla. William and Kate may not have a perfect marriage but then what married person can claim such?

    • anne_000 says:

      They’re a match in that they don’t bring out the best in each other and seem to agree that they shouldn’t.

      • Citresse says:

        Yes anne_000, from that point of view (the one you stated), it’s kind of sad.
        I would like to see more physical activities in the new year involving Kate and William set up as charity events. I think a Celebrity Golf game for charity in Scotland could bring out the best in William and Kate. I would like to see Michael Douglas and Catherine Zeta-Jones there with other celebrities joining the Cambridges in that golf game for charity. Most observers have agreed Kate especially enjoys the outdoors so I believe it would be a good fit.

      • anne_000 says:

        @ Citresse

        That’s a good idea. No talking to plebs. Plebs held back behind a rope. Playing a sport outside. Hobnobbing with celebrities. Sounds like what they’d be comfortable at.

  32. notasugarhere says:

    ArtHistorian, I’m anxiously awaiting Nytarskur (Nytårskur), my favorite Danish Royal Family event. Crossing my fingers for the Midnight Tiara not the rubies.

    • ArtHistorian says:

      Sadly, we didn’t get to see the Midnight Tiara but Mary’s oufit was regal and stunning – and a wonderful example of how to recycle the skirt ofof an expensive brand outfit with another less expensive tailor-made dress in a beautiful and regal manner.

      She paired the beaded skirt of the gorgeous navy Jesper Høvring outfit she wore at the Bambi Awards in 2014 with a new midnight blue dress of velvet with a split skirt and a train. I had a definite renaissance vibe.
      http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-3381661/Princess-Mary-shimmers-satin-celebrates-New-Year.html

      Daisy look great as well. The light blue gown suits her hair and skin – and I adore the Perle Poire Tiara, which, IMO, is the prettiest drop pearl tiara in use.

  33. Salamander says:

    She looks pregnant again.

    • Citresse says:

      I’ve been wondering lately if an announcement will arrive by FEB?

    • kayte says:

      Seriously you jest. She is downright skeletal. You are part of what is wrong with modern society and perpetuating disordered eating and body image problems!

      • Citresse says:

        The end of FEB is 8 weeks from now. Do the math and consider Kate would likely announce early again; meaning right now she is not pregnant.
        I don’t perpetuate disordered eating kayte your comment is illogical.
        Kate got pregnant twice already with a thin frame meaning presumably she’s healthy enough right now to conceive a third time. She better hurry. She’ll be 34 in January.

      • wanda says:

        When I look at Kate I see an extremely thin woman who could do with a few extra pounds on her frame, not someone who seems pregnant. Different eyes see different things I suppose…

      • aurelia says:

        Kate must conceive with the help of clomid. There is no way she is mentsurating with zero body fat.

      • kayte says:

        @aurelia – exactly!

      • FLORC says:

        Aur
        Very thin women can and do conceive.
        It’s when the bf is so low you lack estrogen and testosterone takes over that creates issues with fertility.

    • John P says:

      I’ve been saying that for a few weeks now. Her tummy is rounded in that green coat.

    • sandra d says:

      If that’s what being pregnant looks like, we’re all going to h*ll in a handbasket!!!

  34. DEEVIA says:

    She looks like she could be in a period piece residing in the countryside milking cows and stuff ala “Little House on the Prairie”. People are too stupid to buy into her “fashion”. Style by Jennifer Garner with a touch of old money help YES but that unfortunate eyeliner does not come anywhere near the word “glamour”.

    • John P says:

      Her eyeliner is tattooed on.

      • Citresse says:

        I don’t believe that, but if it’s true, that’s what Edward was making fun of that day in church (saw it on youtube), I guess.

      • wolfie says:

        Not that anyone looked, but her naked photos show her without a stitch of make-up.

      • FLORC says:

        John P
        It’s not. This isn’t my opinion either. Variying photos from dating to recent show the eyeliner can be black or brown. Inside and outside the waterline. Full length or half length. Thick or thin. You cannot do that with a perma tattoo.
        What you see if liquid eyeliner. It’s very tough to apply well and often comes out thick.

  35. carolind says:

    Dont think Kate is pregnant. She would be sick if she was. Think they will have a third child but not yet. Look at the gap between Pippa and James Middleton to get an idea of when Kates next pregnancy will be. It will be done the Middleton way.

  36. PsychoCat says:

    I actually rather like Kate. I think she is pretty, and a lovely antidote to the Kartrashians. I’m Australian and certainly do remember the Diana brouhaha.

    As an aside, William sort of looks photoshopped into the picture! I laughed at him being photoshopped out of the Madonna and child(ren) depiction but he could just as easily be photoshopped in!

    Happy new year lovely Celebitchy folk…

  37. perplexed says:

    I think the public is more interested in George and Charlotte than their parents. Take out George and his grumpy face (which is amusing to a lot of people), and what is there with these two?

  38. teehee says:

    NO. I think the press is trying to make up that she is fascinating and that people are amazed with her— but they arent. She has a small following, but there is definitely no magic, no charm, no nothing that came with Diana, in Catherine. The royal family just misses the attention and now somehow thinks they have a gap to fill— or rather the press is trying to fill the gap— but Catherine isnt doing it. Not a bad thing– but I wish the press would stop with the lies and nonsense that she is something amazing that people love– she is bland. Her clothes are bland. repetitive and underwhelming….

  39. mish mash says:

    Geez his dad was jealous of Diana…I was hoping better for William

  40. hayley says:

    Charlotte looks EXACTLY like Carole Middleton.

  41. Citresse says:

    Wishing the best of health and happiness in New Year 2016 to all fans of Celebitchy around the world.

  42. Charlotte15 says:

    The Court Circular just released the final engagement numbers for 2015 and I CANNOT WAIT for that discussion here on CB! Happy 2016, all!