Angelina Jolie & Brad Pitt are fighting about selling their French chateau

FFN_VAHFF2_JOLIE_A_06212016_52100027

Because my gossip antennae is set to 2005, does anyone else think it’s really suspicious that we’ve been getting all of these paparazzi photos of Angelina Jolie, Brad Pitt, Jennifer Aniston and Justin Theroux for a week? All four of these people can literally go months without being pap’d, and just in the past week, they’ve all been photographed a lot. Very shady! Anyway, these are some photos of Brad and Angelina separately at LAX this week. They flew into LAX on the same day, but not on the same flight. So is there trouble in Brangelina paradise? Perhaps. Sources tell Us Weekly (via the Daily Mail) that Brad is pissed off because Angelina wants to sell the Chateau Miraval. Won’t someone think about the rosé?!?!

Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie seem to have been rather content with each other since meeting on the set of their 2005 action film Mr And Mrs Smith. But the couple, who wed in 2014 and parent six children together, seem to have hit a snag this year, according to a Wednesday report from UsWeekly. It has been claimed the A-list actor, 52, is not happy that his 41-year-old wife wants to sell their sprawling Chateau Miraval property in France to help further her political career in London.

‘Angelina is ramping up her efforts in the political world,’ a source told the publication. The Oscar winner has been working with Arminka Helic, the British House Of Lords member. ‘They share a similar vision.’ said a source. Jolie and Helic have partnered up for a nonprofit based in the UK. It looks as if Angelina wants to enter the House Of Lords, because the source said she is interested in unloading the Miraval estate she owns with Pitt. Only tax-paying British residents are allowed into the House. Turns out Brad does not want to let go of the French estate, which he has tirelessly renovated and which produces their brand of pink wine.

‘She wants to sell Chateau Miraval and Brad refuses,’ said the source. Pitt owns a home in the Los Feliz area of Los Angeles but it is not known if that is in her name as well and will have to go too. And though Jolie is slated for a Maleficent sequel which Disney confirmed this spring, a source added ‘she has turned her back on Hollywood.’

[From The Daily Mail]

Angelina could have been a British citizen through marriage, correct? Her first marriage was to Jonny Lee Miller, a British citizen. I doubt she ever applied for dual citizenship while married to JLM or anything, but I’m just saying: shouldn’t she become a British citizen first, then worry about joining the House of Lords? And is it really true (help me out, Britishers) that she would have to give up property outside of England? Does no one in the House of Lords own property in France, Spain, America, Canada, Asia or Africa? Isn’t it possible to be a tax-paying British citizen AND own property abroad? Angelina already has dual citizenship in Cambodia, and didn’t Namibia give her citizenship too? I get that citizenship rules are pretty complicated and differ from country to country, but I think Us Weekly is just making sh-t up. It could be that Jolie does want to pursue a full-time political career and it could be that she thinks Miraval is a money-pit. But it might not have anything to do with citizenship.

FFN_VAH_Pitt_Brad_062116_52100475

Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

120 Responses to “Angelina Jolie & Brad Pitt are fighting about selling their French chateau”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. ann says:

    I thought they were renting it. They actually own it? I have also heard that they co own it with some other wine maker guy.

    • doofus says:

      I thought they were renting, too, but I don’t keep up with their real estate purchases. I’m sure there’s a fan on here who would know. I kinda liked the wine, I hope they keep making it.

      As for this…

      “but I think Us Weekly is just making sh-t up.”

      YA THINK?!!! 😉

      • almondmilk says:

        I’m confused… how does selling Mirival help her diplomat endeavors & family life in London? Are they implying they need to sell one abode to buy another? Bahaha. Yea, right.

        And secondly, how is she turning her back on Hollywood if she’s signed on to another huge Maleficent turn AND is signing on to ‘Murder on the Orient Express?’ Plus she has directing projects that have yet to come out.

        Heck of a contradiction Us Weakly.

        Also… If Brad doesn’t want to sell the French estate, Angelina wouldn’t want to sell it either. People (haters and tabloids) always deliberately pretend to not understand their dynamic. I’ve heard they want what the other wants. They want to make each other happy. Pretty much ‘gift of the maji’ type stuff. So when fans hear about tabloids fights over ish like selling a house…it’s laughable.

      • Emma - The JP Lover says:

        @Doofue, who wrote: “I thought they were renting, too, but I don’t keep up with their real estate purchases. I’m sure there’s a fan on here who would know.”

        LOL! Yes, there are lots of fans know that the Jolie-Pitt’s purchased Chateau Miraval in 2012 for $60 million after leasing it in 2008 (for some reason, perhaps a French property law, it was stipulated by the prior owner that they had to ‘lease’ the property for a number of years before being allowed to purchase it).

        Here is an excerpt from a September 4, 2014 online “People” article titled “All About Brad and Angelina’s Chateau Miraval (Yes, It has a Moat!)” by Peter Mikelbank and Gabrielle Olya (and there are loads of other articles about the purchase as well) where it is stated that the Jolie-Pitts purchased the property:

        “Though the Jolie-Pitts officially purchased the home in 2012 for an estimated $60 million, they were not the first notable names to pass through its historical gates. It is believed that in 1252, influential philosopher and theologian Saint Thomas Aquinas spent several days at Miraval.”

        Here is the link to the article:

        http://www.people.com/article/brad-pitt-angelina-all-about-chateau-miraval-wedding-details

    • H says:

      Last year, I was in New Orleans and Brad had not sold their place there. They want like 4.6M for that. Maybe sell that and the LA house, then they can afford a place in London? I’m sure this is a BS story, as Brad and Angie aren’t hurting for money, nor have to give up property in France to reside in the UK. This might become moot tomorrow with Brexit vote anyway.

      • lucy2 says:

        I love fancy real estate stuff! Looks like the NO place is still listed for $5.6 million, but that’s about $2 million more than the next most expensive house (which is around the corner, larger and has more rooms). If they are intent on selling, I think the price is going to have to drop.
        Such pretty properties in that area.

      • Cait says:

        Given the short term rental crisis here in NOLA, I’m actually shocked it’s still on the market.

  2. Jade says:

    Brad is looking HOT!!!!!! I’m rooting for these two.

  3. minx says:

    Does anyone really think B and A confide to untrustworthy confidants? Uh, I don’t.
    That’s why these stories about them always sound so fake. They keep their mouths shut so people have to make stuff up.

    • doofus says:

      agree. considering how Jolie was able to pull of her surgeries without anyone knowing jack sh*t until SHE made it public is testament to how “closed” their circle is.

    • Esmom says:

      Yeah this sounds like complete BS. The stupid leaps they make…”she’s working with someone in the House of Lords so now she wants to BE in the House of Lords.” Slow news day, I guess.

    • Maya says:

      They pulled of their wedding, two operations, adopting and pregnancies without any hint to the press and public.

      They have trusted circle of people who has never broken their trust – the media knows jack.

    • PrincessMe says:

      What you said, minx.

    • Lucinda says:

      Yes. It’s bs. Could it be they took separate flights because one of them needed to be in LA early and the other wanted to sleep in or had stuff to take care of before flying back to LA? I mean, I realize it’s a completely mundane explanation but given the lifestyle they lead, it makes more sense than taking separate flights with different kids because they are having a tiff. Geez.

      • Emma - The JP Lover says:

        @Lucinda, who wrote: “Yes. It’s bs. Could it be they took separate flights because one of them needed to be in LA early and the other wanted to sleep in or had stuff to take care of before flying back to LA? I mean, I realize it’s a completely mundane explanation but given the lifestyle they lead, it makes more sense than taking separate flights with different kids because they are having a tiff. Geez.”

        In just his past week articles have been written here at “Celebitchy” about Brad flying to France to start the Le Mans race and Angie, Maddox, and Knox flying to New York City where she attended a meeting with John Kerry. Brad and Angie flew out of LAX to different locations, and they flew back to LAX on the same day from different locations … hence, the different arrival times.

      • PimmsCupInAPimpCup says:

        Parents sometimes do that- take seperate flights. Just In case, it would be a high improbability that both aircraft crash.

  4. LT says:

    I actually drank their rose on Friday – it was good!

    • NotSoSocialButterfly says:

      I have had it, too- good, but if you like a more prominent red berry flavor in your rosé, try Hecht & Bannier. Delicious.

    • KiddVicious says:

      I like it too. Good for summer.

    • doofus says:

      I’m not usually a wine-drinker and almost never rose, but I did like theirs. as Kidd said, it’s a good summer drink.

  5. Lala says:

    Wow I wish I had fights like that with the hubby… Ah rich people’s problems

  6. MrsBPitt says:

    Ahh….Aniston is pregnant and Brangelina is fighting….some things never change!

  7. tracking says:

    Seems like the usual sketchy tab article. But it wouldn’t surprise me if they’d consider selling, only because they seem so busy that they can’t spend much time there.

  8. Mia4s says:

    This story makes no sense. Is she a British or Commonwealth citizen? No? Well then she’s not sitting in the House of Lords. Even if she was a citizen why would it matter if she owned a house in France. Establishing residency has nothing to do with owning another property elsewhere.

    Tabloid reporters, please stay in your lane; selfies and nip slips. Anything more and I’m worried your brain will explode.

    • manda says:

      Yeah I’m confused–doesn’t one have to be a member of the aristocracy to be in the House of Lords? Can one buy a title to become a member of that house?

    • caitlinK says:

      Mia4: THANK YOU. I completely agree: this specious speculation about her citizenship and her right to own property abroad makes no sense whatsoever. Someone clarify what on earth is trying to be said?

  9. sofie says:

    Angelina was doing her Unhcr & PSVI work. Brad went to LeMans 24 for a few days. You don’t have to be together every single day. In fact think it’s healthy to have time to yourself. Just because we don’t see them together all the time does not mean they are having problems. There are many celeb couples you don’t see together all the time but they go home to each other. Are they also having problems? Don’t believe anything that comes from a tabloid when it comes to this couple. They have there home life and no tabloid or gossip knows anything about them apart from what they think will sell.

    • lisa2 says:

      Exactly.. we know Brad was waving the starting flag weeks ago. And World Refugee Day is on the same day. They don’t move these things to co ensign with Jennifer Aniston and her Husband being in NYC and in the press. Unless Brad and Angie are clairvoyant and can predict JA movements months in advance.. And how could they be on the same flight. He was coming from the UK.. she came from NYC. Hardly the same direction.

      • Colette says:

        Now you know Brad should have flown from UK to NYC so he could be on the same flight to LAX with Knox,Jamie,Maddox and Angie.They are obviously separated,just admit @lisa2. 😉
        #sarcasm

  10. LOT says:

    Maybe they received a good offer or she thinks they can make a good capital gain after their rosé has been awarded and he doesn’t want to sell anyway.
    Aren’t they normal family discussions on investment strategy, especially when assets and estates are huge?
    I spend hours talking about different options with my husband it’s so difficult to make the right investment choice nowadays.

  11. lisa2 says:

    LMAO.. so Angie is what going to apply for citizenship..LOL. Will she divorce Brad and marry a Brit again. And how long will that process take. And she according to the DUMB story wants to be in the House of Lords.. DUH Angie can’t just enter the House of Lords because she not a British citizen but she’s not a UK peer. And besides that why would she need to sell their Miraval property.. FUNNY the now admit that they OWN it instead of saying they are renting. I don’t think Brad and Angie would have spent MILLIONS on a rental property. And engraved a monument to her mother that someone would remove when they felt like it. Do these people not have any common sense to actually think about what makes sense and what doesn’t. Nice since Brad and Angie have a wine business that they are profiting from.

    They really need to come up with better stores. I guess the Divorce stories and cheating ones didn’t sell well. OH and what happened to the Syrian Orphan that they were suppose to have adopted.. I haven’t seen the kid.
    Oh and Angie is the one that really wanted a home in France. And Brad and she have both said it is the place they plan on residing in when all the Hollywood stuff is over.

    • Sixer says:

      See my comment #28 below for the entry requirements.

      She doesn’t need to be a peer. If you are appointed to the HoL, THAT is the point at which you are given a peerage. This peerage lasts for your lifetime and you do not pass it on to your children.

  12. Luca76 says:

    It’s such a weirdly non juicy reason to be fighting that there may be some truth to it but I doubt she’d ever run for office.

    • tracking says:

      The only possibility I could see is that she might prefer to settle in the UK, since she’s focusing a lot of her work there now, while Pitt might prefer France. Even with their wealth, they could probably only afford one big European estate. This is such a sketchy article though.

  13. sofie says:

    This is just another made up story from a tabloid. Don’t think anyone believes this rubbish anymore.

  14. Maria says:

    if Angie wasnt so slow Tom Hiddleston would have married her…

  15. Rhiley says:

    I wrote this a few days ago, but I love Brad Pitt’s jeans. They look really good on him and are a lovely shade of blue.

  16. Delta Juliet says:

    What a coincidence. My husband and I are fighting about the same thing.

  17. Relli says:

    I am not British but I think you can own land outside of the country based on the fact the Queen bought a condo in my parents building last year for the Canadian consul.

    http://www.chicagobusiness.com/realestate/20150915/CRED0701/150919914/her-majesty-buys-a-buckingham-place

    • notasugarhere says:

      HM also owns a horse breeding operation in Kentucky.

      I think the article (filled with lies) is trying to say she wants to sell the French estate, make London their European home base, and become a citizen. If that was their main home, would that qualify her as a UK taxpayer eventually? Sixer, where are you?

  18. roses says:

    Based on the story above it states she wants to enter the House of Lords. Not happening, you have to be an actual UK citizen to be in the Parliament and you can’t be in Parliament if you’re a citizen of another country. Not sure why US weekly didn’t double check their source before printing what they did. Us Weekly has been slacking lately, they need to do better:)

    • The Other Katherine says:

      Have to point out some factual inaccuracies here. First, you do not have to be a UK citizen to sit in Parliament; Irish citizens and Commonwealth citizens with the right to remain are eligible to stand as MPs. Second, dual citizens are not barred from becoming UK MPs — I believe you are thinking of Australian MPs. Google the UK Electoral Commission guidance.

      • Starkiller says:

        Factual inaccuracy or not, the point is moot-an American Hollywood actress will sit in the House of Lords around the same time there is a measurable snowfall in hell.

        I could excuse this if the article was actually from US, but they just reprinted it-it’s from the Daily Fail. Shouldn’t a British newspaper know better than this, for god’s sake?

  19. Dana says:

    What a load of rubbish. Most in the house of lords are hereditary there are others but first you need to be a uk citizan which she isnt. Then there is a process no doubt long and tedious to even get approval. Why would she want to be one? I dont understand she would need too.

    • Lady D says:

      Sixer (#11) says you can’t pass the title on, you keep it for your lifetime. Can you have Peer as a title before or without being a member of the House of Lords?

    • Sixer says:

      Only 92 of 800 members of the HoL are hereditary peers. Most hereditary peers were removed from the House in 1999. Most existing hereditary peers are not members.

  20. Maya says:

    Umm – Angelina flew from New York to LAX while Brad flew from Europe to LAX. Tell me again how it will be possible for them to be on the same flight?

    Angelina was in New York for humanitarian reasons and Brad for work reasons. Jennifer was in New York to do a pap parade to get some attention and to divert attention from Heidi’s mother’s interview which confirmed she is a h o m e wrecker.

    It was known for months that Angelina and Brad will do official stuff in public last weekend and suddenly we see Jennifer papped? One of the paps gave an exclusive interview some months ago confirming that Jennifer knows how to avoid the press and that SHE calls them when she needs publicity.

    All these trouble in paradise stories between Angelina and Brad worked 10 years ago but now the public thankfully don’t believe them. If you see the comments from people they all say that it’s bs and that they are in love and happy with their children.

    Angelina and Brad have moved on, the public has moved on and now it’s time for the press to move on.

    • notasugarhere says:

      As parents of six children, flying on separate flights from same city to same city would be a smart move anyway. You do not want both parents on the same flight unless all the kids are with them too. Otherwise you could end up with six orphaned children.

      • lisa2 says:

        True.. but they weren’t flying from the same city. he was going from London to LA.. she NYC to LA.

      • NotSoSocialButterfly says:

        Your comment brought up old anxieties about flying with and without my children when they were young Parents never stop worrying about their kids!

      • notasugarhere says:

        lisa2, I read Maya’s comment before I responded and knew that they were not flying from the same city. I was pointing out that even if they had been flying from the same city it would be smarter to be on separate planes.

      • Jwoolman says:

        That was my thought exactly- it’s advised for parents to take different flights when possible because of such concerns. On the one hand, you’re more likely to die in a car crash… But Jolie and Pitt travel by air much more than most.

        The rest of the story seemed equally off base to me. House of Lords?!? Maybe House of Commons if she’s actually interested in politics and wants to shift to the UK. But that will take a long time to get citizenship, for starters.

  21. TheOtherMaria says:

    Nah, I’m not buying what these tabloids are selling.

    The Jolie-Pitts are fine.

    They’ve done well with their wine and that home has been around for a minute, hell, they married there!

    There’s always problems with them per the media, yet after a decade, they seem happier than ever!

    • Liz says:

      They’ve also put on sale a large estate in the Verona (Italy) countryside that they’d bought about 1 year ago: an XVIII villa surrounded by wine producing land. Paid 32millions euros it’s on the market for 15, because “THEY WANT TO SELL IT QUICK”, according to the agent.

  22. mini says:

    First it is cheating, then health, then kids and now the home where they were married. OMG How Brad and Angie are able to withstand all of these phoney , lying tabloid stories is beyond me. Hopefully they ignore as their fans should. Why not wish for this couple married with 6 kis t survive instead of constantly malign. Oh I forgot they broke stories as well. They came back different times. Oh by the way they were in different countries.

    • lisa2 says:

      I have said this before. They have had far worse stories written about them then pretty much anyone in Hollywood. Not just pregnancy stories but stories far more vile. I would feel sorry for them but they don’t give a rats butt and do their thing and never whine about any of it.

      So if you are a celeb and the stories about you are in the same vein as they deal with.. then come and whine.. otherwise deal and move on.

  23. jeanpierre says:

    Rosé is such a bad wine.

  24. Ana says:

    Yes, they arrive at LAX in the same day and in different flights. Why? Probably because he took a plane in London and she took a plane in NY. LOL
    There are some evidences that shouldn’t be discussed. But its Brad and Angelina.

  25. Grinling Gibbons says:

    Speaking as an ex-pat who is currently living in England and married to a British citizen, simply being married to a Brit doesn’t give you anything. You still have to apply for a visa to live and work in the country, and the citizenship route takes about 5–8 years once you’ve settled in the country. (For us mere mortals, it’s bloody expensive as well!). So no, Angelina wouldn’t have had any special rights just from marrying Jonny Lee Miller, British citizen or not. They were also married for only 3 years so I highly doubt she had time to begin any kind of citizenship route either way! (Can you tell I’m a bit bitter?! Immigration is a pain, man!).

    • The Other Katherine says:

      The residency requirements for UK citizenship are reduced if you’re applying as the spouse of an existing UK citizen, but it’s still 3 years, and you have to have been granted indefinite leave to remain prior to your citizenship application, which is also a pain in the butt. BTDT! Anyway, no way Jolie has ever met the residency requirements — if one of her parents was a UK citizen she would, I believe, be eligible to apply on that basis, but I don’t think either of them was.

      CB, Us Weekly is totally making sh!t up. You certainly don’t need to divest yourself of non-UK property to reside in the UK and become a citizen there — I can attest to this from personal experience.

      • profdanglais says:

        The residency requirement for citizenship for spouses of British citizens is 3 years, but the requirement for ILR, which you need before you can get citizenship, is 5 years. When I moved to the UK in 2008, it was only 2 years to ILR and 3 to citizenship but they changed the rules in 2012.

      • The Other Katherine says:

        @profdanglais, I’m pretty sure that’s not the case (multiple years to ILR under new rules) if you go the SET(M) route where you and your partner are married and living outside the UK, your UK citizen spouse moves back to the UK and settles, and then you file your SET(M) application (from whichever other country you, the non-UK spouse, are still living in apart from your UK spouse) to settle in the UK permanently. But it’s a logistical nightmare for most people due to the separation and the need to maintain 2 households temporarily, and hence not used that often.

      • profdanglais says:

        Sorry, Katherine, but that’s not how it works. You can’t apply for SET(M) from outside the UK. External applications are spousal visas, they are good for 2.5 years after which you have to apply for FLR(M) which lasts for another 2.5 years, then SET(M) for ILR. For people who move to the UK on fiance visas, it’s fiance visa (6 months) –> FLR(M)(2.5 years) –> FLR(M) again (2.5 years) –> SET(M). It’s sort of explained here (https://www.gov.uk/remain-in-uk-family/eligibility). Note that the 2 year route is only available to people who applied for their first step before 9 July 2012. For everyone after that it’s 5 years to ILR. The citizenship requirement remains only 3 years because citizenship is managed by the Home Office and settlement by UK Visas and Immigration.

        I think what you’re talking about (applying for indefinite leave from outside the UK) is something that used to be allowed for people who had been married to their British partner for 5+ years outside the UK, but it was abolished a long time ago, even before the changes in 2012. There was a specific name for it, but I can’t remember now what it was.

      • The Other Katherine says:

        Huh, I thought the SET(M) was for external applications. Thanks for finding that link — the form instructions aren’t very clear. I was in the group of people who were married to their UK spouse for 5+ years outside the UK — that pathway was axed less than a year after I applied and I settled in 2011, so it must have been about 5 years ago that they eliminated it.

  26. JUne says:

    Now how in the world could they arrive on the same flight when they were coming from two different countries? Not possible.

    Brad was taking care of business in France, Angelina was taking care of business in NYC. Now they are all in LA together.

  27. profdanglais says:

    British citizenship isn’t automatically conferred when you marry a British citizen. Angelina and JLM were married years ago when it was a lot easier to obtain citizenship through marriage, but there were still residency requirements and you still had to apply, which I doubt she did in her early 20s. She’s not British and can’t be in the House of Lords, and even if she could she wouldn’t need to sell her property in France. There’s a strong whiff of BS through this whole story.

  28. Sixer says:

    You can own property where you like and still sit in the HoL.

    You must be: a) at least 21 years old, b) not a bankrupt, and c) a citizen of the UK, Ireland, or a Commonwealth country.

    If Namibia did give her citizenship (no idea about that), then she would be eligible as Namibia is a Commonwealth nation.

    • The Other Katherine says:

      Certainly for MPs it’s not just enough to be a Commonwealth citizen, you have to be a Commonwealth citizen with the right to reside in the UK indefinitely and come and go freely. Isn’t that also true for HoL? AJ wouldn’t qualify for right of abode in UK, I’m pretty sure, as the criteria for Commonwealth citizens are pretty strict, and AFAIK she couldn’t qualify for indefinite leave to remain unless she did an investor visa, came to live, and later applied for a settlement visa after meeting residency requirements.

      Anyway, the whole article is such a tissue of nonsense, but having had to go through the pain of learning about UK immigration rules myself, I can’t help but overanalyse!

    • Sixer says:

      Unsure because they keep changing the rules to satisfy a media-fuelled anti-immigrant sentiment (see also: referendum) to distract from EU free movement, so that it’s almost impossible to work out who does and doesn’t have right to reside! You’re probably right.

      Regardless of the technicalities, I doubt TPTB would give her a life peerage unless she set up shop here. It wouldn’t be a popular move at all, would it? I can see someone like Bill Bryson (if he were still here) getting into the HoL before I can see Angelina.

      • The Other Katherine says:

        Yeah, Bryson has a UK spouse and lived here for years. Love his books.

      • Sixer says:

        Exactly. If Kevin Spacey hadn’t gone back to the US after his stint at the Old Vic and had arts policy ambitions, I could see him being a candidate, you know? But I think they’d have to be seen as living here for the public to accept it.

  29. Emily says:

    Yea, okay, selling a house, whatever….is that Maddox in the background of the top photo? Or worse, Pax? I say worse because seeing a full-blown teenager is making me feel SO OLD.

  30. Freddy Spaghetti says:

    The story sounds like hot nonsense but what on earth is Angelina wearing in those airport photos? It’s worse than that ill fitting suit she wore (which looked like something Kate Middleton would wear, and just as badly) for her big speech in the US.

    • meme says:

      her usual black schmatas, that’s what she’s wearing because she hasn’t got TIME to wear anything else.

      • lisa2 says:

        HOW DARE she wear black. How dare she wear what she wants.. She should be arrested STAT.

        Nothing wrong with what she is wearing.. a black top and skirt. And she has on a black wrap.. Scandalous for sure.

    • lucy2 says:

      Hot nonsense is a great description of this tabloid story!

      Also, I scrolled back up to see what she was wearing after reading your comment – egads! Looks like something one would have worn for a year of mourning back in the day, and I say that as someone who wears a lot of black myself.

    • KB says:

      She does it to devalue the paparazzi photos. If she walked through in pink or red, the photos would spread like wildfire and cost a premium, but these look just like all the others.

  31. Triple Cardinal says:

    Let’s say–as a hypothetical–that her ownership of the house is a problem. There’s a simple solution: Brad buys her out.

    But since this whole story is BS, I don’t think we’ll be reading about any RE sale to Brad.

    • Jwoolman says:

      That’s what I thought, too. Such a non- issue for two rich people. If he wants the house and she doesn’t, just sell her share to him. Problem solved.

  32. Aly says:

    it definitely one of them who runned to Usweekly to leak this information. so strange instead of solving your own issues at home.

    • Jwoolman says:

      It’s definitely not one of them, because
      1) they keep a tight lid on everything important (they’re not Kardashians), and
      2) they are both intelligent and logical enough to come up with a story to spread that is internally consistent, which this one isn’t.

  33. Joannie says:

    The story may be BS but I don’t think these two are together. He has been filming in Malta and she’s been in the US with her brother. He came back for a few days then left again for France and she was back in NW. Still with her brother tagging along. The brother has been with her for months now and Brad no where in sight. I say somethings up. Too bad as they have all those children and I don’t like to see a family split. I said this the other day. You cannot sustain a marriage when you are apart often and for long periods of time. That’s why so many of these HW marriages don’t last.

    • Paige says:

      No, just tabloid speculation. Pics online say otherwise. In recent months, Brad was filming a movie in London, not Malta. Angelina and a few of the kids were seen shopping in London, when Brad was filming his movie there. They were all in Los Angeles together, too. Daily Mail has pics of them leaving LAX and arriving at LAX, so they the entire family was in Los Angeles before he went to France and she went to NYC. Brad went to France last week for the The 24 Hours of Le Mans and Angelina was in New York for World’s Refugee Day. Now, they are back together in L.A.

      • Joannie says:

        I think you’re incorrect because I saw numerous photos of him filming in Malta over the last few months. When they moved the set from London Angie and the kids flew back to LA. I’m sure you can go online and find out if I’m wrong. He was filming a war movie with a well known French actress. Sorry I can’t remember her name. The pics of him with Angie and the kids in London were from March.

      • Paige says:

        They were in London and Los Angeles together. Brad’s movie was filmed in Spain for a few days. I couldn’t find any pics in Malta, only London photos with Marion Cotillard. Brad and Angelina filmed By The Sea in Malta. Celebrity couples can be in a relationship without being photographed together. As a matter of fact, the Jolie Pitts are rarely photographed when they are in Los Angeles. Jamie is family. I’ve seen a lot of pics of Jamie with Angelina, Brad, and the kids over the years. Same way with Brad’s parents. They have been traveling together, like they always have. It was the same way when Angelina was filming in Cambodia. Brad and the kids were with her.

    • Minxx says:

      I’m afraid you are right. I sense that something is different between them, it’s been months and months since they were photographed attending something together and they’re constantly in different parts of the world. Plus, Brad looks hot as hell 🙂 . I don’t think it’s about property or political ambitions though. It would be really sad if they split, with 6 kids but it seems like they’ve been going in different directions this past year. I don’t have a horse in this race, it’s just an observation, I like them together but something is off.

      • Maya says:

        When were they supposed to be photographed together? Which event should they have attended together?

        The only official thing they attended together was BAFTA – after that they were in London together for few months. Brad was shooting while Angelina did humanitarian stuff. Even this week Brad had to go to France while Angelina had to attend Refugee Day. Two separate things they attended and flew straight back home afterwards.

        Again do tell me which event they were supposed to attend together?

        They did were not in different part of the world at all. Both were in London since early this year and now they are in LA together.

        Both Brad and Angelina are looking hot again because they were in LA resting for a few weeks. They could also have been given the all clear for cancer risk – the relief takes years of you.

        Seriously 11 years and it’s time to stop wishing for a family of 8 to break up.

      • B n A fn says:

        What’s different is the kids are getting older, Angelina is staying home more, and doing her other projects. Brad is picking up the slack by working more taking care of his family. I remember Angelina saying the children are going to be needing more of her time at home.

        They were traveling separately because Brad was coming from London and Angelina was coming from New York, they both landed in LA the same day, just different time.

        Btw, they were spotted out about two weeks ago dining out with another couple.

      • Joannie says:

        Sorry Paige I was wrong. They were filming on a Spanish island Grand Canaria for several months. There are numerous photos on the Daily Mail.
        Sorry to burst your bubble Maya. They weren’t together. There’s your proof. And no one is wishing for them to split but it happens. I believe it already has.

      • Maya says:

        @Joannie: you keep wishing to break up a family but it hasn’t happened.

        They only shot in Canaria for 10 days or so – that island is only few hours away from London.

        Again – Angelina was pictured with her children in London at the same time. She also recorded her interview on BBC at the same time.

        Sorry to burst YOUR bubble but they were and are indeed together. There are also tweets about them having dinner together with another couple a few weeks ago.

        So you just go ahead and think they have broken up (because you want them to split) while the proof proves you wrong.

      • Paige says:

        @joannie
        Maya is right. Brad wasn’t in Spain for months. Most of Allied was filmed in London. I don’t understand why it’s so hard believe Brad and Angelina were together while he was filming his movie. They’ve been doing this forever. The only time they didn’t stay together for filming was when she was filming Unbroken and he was filming Fury, and even they said it was difficult for them. So you believe they have split because, you think they haven’t been together, when they have been in fact together. Huh..

      • lisa2 says:

        @Joannie.

        Brad started filming in Spain on May 22.. and filmed for around 7-9 days straight. May to June is not several months. And I have picture proof of this. Not speculation

  34. Tessa says:

    I doubt there is one person in the House who pays tax!
    Plus wasn’t her mum French so she could get an EU passport?

    • Goats on the Roof says:

      Marcheline Bertrand was not French. Angelina’s grandfather was of French Canadian descent, but none of her close family has French citizenship.

  35. ellen says:

    Some people are just weird,these two love each other and know what works for them.They were seen out and about just today

  36. Camille says:

    What a load of BS.

  37. EM says:

    First world problems.

  38. Molly says:

    to me, the real question here is how will Brexet affect this?