Duchess Kate is ‘not comfortable at the end of a lens,’ says former Vogue editor

kate vogue UK

Last year, the then-editor-in-chief of British Vogue, Alexandra Shulman, put the Duchess of Cambridge on the cover of their centenary issue. It was the first time Kate had ever agreed to a magazine editorial, and Kate got to dictate her terms: no glamour, no gowns, no palaces, no castles, no glam squad. She just wanted to look simple and impossibly horsey and aristocratic in some jeans and a terrible hat in a country setting. Some of you pointed out that it almost seemed like Kate was doing Jecca Craig cosplay. The issue sold poorly and a few months after Shulman’s big “get,” she was no longer editor of British Vogue. Perhaps there was no connection, perhaps there was a connection.

What I do know is that Shulman has taken it upon herself to talk a lot about what Kate is like in person, and what it was like to work with her on this kind of project, a relatively simple photoshoot. Shulman previously said that Kate is not interested in being a “high voltage celebrity” like Princess Diana, and basically Kate is a lovely sort of country girl, like an aristocrat who just dresses up because she has to for the job. Shulman also claimed that Kate is “not a clothes horse” nor is Kate a “silent mannequin,” all evidence to the contrary. Now Shulman has more to say about the photoshoot:

On Saturday the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge celebrated six years of marriage, but that isn’t the only anniversary Kate has this weekend. Yesterday, April 29, also marked one year since the wife of Prince William was unveiled as making her debut appearance on the cover of British Vogue. To mark the occasion former editor-in-chief of the magazine Alexandra Shulman has recounted the surprisingly laid back shoot with Her Royal Highness. In her first-person piece for Vogue Online the editor recalled how Kate shunned ball gowns on set in favour of a more casual wardrobe.

Shulman writes: ‘She didn’t want to be dressed as a fashion plate and was not keen to be shot in gala gowns and tiaras.’

As was seen in the centenary issue of the magazine the Duchess was photographed by Josh Ollins in a wardrobe she would select for herself at the weekend made up of mainly jeans and t-shirts. According to Shulman the royal, 35, who had chosen to be photographed in the countryside to reflect her personal life, had arrived on set in hair rollers – ‘joking’ about who might have spotted her on her journey in.

Surprisingly, while she spends much of her day being photographed Shulman described Kate as not feeling ‘comfortable at end of lens’. What she did notice, however, was the Duchess’ unexpected lack of interest in her own appearance.

Recalling her reaction after having her makeup done Shulman writes: ‘Most of us would need constant reassurance, whereas she demonstrated none of these neuroses, which showed an admirable and surprising lack of vanity’ adding that she ‘scarcely even checking herself in the mirror afterwards’.

As would be expected in any high profile shoot the Vogue team kitted out the set with amenities to suit HRH including having broadband fitted – however, none of this was necessary as the editor comments that the Duchess did not check her phone once.

[From The Daily Mail]

Personally, I think this speaks to Kate’s lack of curiosity. This was her first time being photographed and aided by a team of professional fashion people. Instead of asking questions and showing an interest in what they were doing or even – gasp! – asking for advice, Kate was just stuck in her own little aristocratic fantasy. And the result was poorly lit photos of Kate’s scouse brows as she posed rather awkwardly. While I would have been awkward as hell if I was being photographed by a Vogue team, I would have asked so many questions! I would have asked them to do a running commentary on how they were applying makeup. There would have been a flurry of emails about the fashion choices ahead of time. I would have asked the photographer about how to pose and how to work with the camera. But that’s just me. Apparently I’m not as country-girl-aristo as Kate.

kate2

Photos courtesy of Josh Olin/British Vogue.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

132 Responses to “Duchess Kate is ‘not comfortable at the end of a lens,’ says former Vogue editor”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. littlemissnaughty says:

    That shoot is the picture equivalent of Ambien. Seems right.

    Why is this woman still talking about it when it wasn’t a success at all? The cover is especially atrocious, her face is NOT that unattractive.

    • INeedANap says:

      I feel like that cover would only work with someone who normally gets all fancy schmancy or dressed up. Like a down-home shoot for Rihanna or Queen Rania would be awesome.

      • Maryram6 says:

        Rihanna and Queen Rania in the same sentence gives me anxiety …lol

      • Menutia says:

        I know I’m probably wrong, but as a casual observer I don’t think she does like being all girly and dressed up. All the college pics I’ve seen she’s almost a tom boy, sporty and in casual clothes. I think all of this fashion stuff isn’t her. But what do I know.

      • Citresse says:

        Menutia, I agree with you. Kate is a sure mix of granola and athletic, but more on the granola side.

    • sarah says:

      agree. her face is literally in a shadow in both pics. as every good photographer knows, let there be light! every one involved in these photos should be side-eyed, even kate.

  2. Pumpkin Pie says:

    She is not comfortable in her royal role. She is comfortable being married to bill the ordinary, but not comfortable with the responsibilities.

    • Seraphina says:

      Exactly. She is uncomfortable in so many things except being Will’s wife. I think we should just take a deep breath and come to terms with her lack “it” and “it” runs a wide spectrum. She exhists to live the posh life.

      I saw Queen Maxima at one of the birthday parties recently and then also some other pics of other European royals. They shine and they show they love their life. I get nothing but VOID from Kate.

      Anyone else would use all resources to their full advantage. She has the world at her feet and money to help. And yet this is what she gives the world. And if she didn’t want expectations put on her, she should have never married into this family.

      • Digital Unicorn (aka Betti) says:

        I saw that – Maxima’s dress was AMAZING!!! Sophie Wessex looked pretty good too. Lets not forget Queen Sonja’s fabulous lime green dress – I loved it and she does love her bright colours.

        But I spent most of the time gazing at CP Haakon, love him.

      • Erica says:

        Kate was just in it for the perks and to stick it to people who laughed at her during the Waity Katie years.I think now that she has made her bed she realizes it isn’t what she thought it would be.

      • Fire&Blood says:

        Seraphina, was this for King Harald and Queen Sonja’s joint birthday?
        *sigh* if it was, yes she did look amazing and I love her more for wearing the sapphire tiara in a different configuration from when she wore it at King Willem’s inauguration

      • notasugarhere says:

        Fire&Blood I think it was the joint party. His birthday is in February (he’s 80), hers in July (she’s 79 turning 80).

        Maxima’s dress was amazing, as were Victoria’s and Mathilde’s. Martha Louise looked great too. Mary’s was a let down for me, because it mimics (badly) her beautiful pale pink silk gown that I like so much. Plus she’s been infected with Marie’s love of unflattering dropped waist evening gowns.

      • Splinter says:

        I was looking at those pictures as well. This party is well worth covering here. I didn’t know that Sofia of Sweden is pregnant again.

      • Seraphina says:

        Fire&Blood, she look completely out together at Queen Sonja’s 80th but did you see her dress for her William-Alexander’s 50 birthday dinner???? OMG. My jaw dropped. She hit it out of the ball park as far as I’m concerned. And her smile and her body language just adds to it. A class A act for sure!

        Sorry for late post, I’m at work and can’t catch up until later 🙁

  3. SR168 says:

    Actually, apart from the heinous hat, I think that she looks really naturally pretty and comfortable in these two photographs (anybody else see the resemblance in the second photograph to Daniela Ruah {Kenzi from NCIS:LA}?). The point about lack of curiosity during the process though is a good one.

  4. sarri says:

    You could hide a lot of things in those eyebrows.

  5. Lala says:

    Pehraps she’s just not that interested in being human doll for fashuuun community. I don’t think that it’s the testimony of her general lack of interest.

    • Seraphina says:

      Lala, some interest in fashion would help the Brit designers. But of course she can’t be bothered with pushing herself to help others on a bigger scale of what is in her posh and sheltered environment.

      • BearcatLawyer says:

        @Seraphina – She certainly seems to care very little about philanthropy and actively helping the less fortunate. Sad really, given how much TQ, the DoE, Charles, etc. genuinely seem to enjoy charitable endeavours and interacting with the beneficiaries of programs they have supported.

      • Digital Unicorn (aka Betti) says:

        This was discussed yesterday in one of the royal threads – a cousin said that Kate has always struggled to show an interest in others and for things outside her own bubble. Which is a nicer of way of saying she’s extremely self absorbed who thinks everything should revolve around her and her needs.

    • BearcatLawyer says:

      @Lala – I do not buy that. She loves fashion enough to spend thousands of pounds on designer clothes which she often has tailored/reworked to fit whatever fashionable notions she has in her otherwise largely vacant head.

      This story supports what’s I have long believed about Kate: she cares very deeply about what the aristocracy thinks of her. She is still trying very hard to reassure them that she is “just like them! Really!” But they – and we – can all see her and her family for the impostors that they are.

      Ironically, she would have been better off not trying to be something she is not and just being a fun, happy, curious person. I daresay an awful lot of Bill’s friends would have had more respect for her staying true to herself and not turning into the Wisteria sister she has become.

      • Bettyrose says:

        Bearcat,
        ITA! She has the ring, the title, she’s the mother of the heir. That can’t ever be taken from her. Time to learn how to enjoy being herself. Make the aristos adapt to her personality. Won’t happen, but girl has a way stronger foothold in that world than she realizes.

      • LaLa says:

        I can only speak for how it is in Continental Europe, but… She seems to not even know that nobility and royalty, although closely related in some aspects, are completely different things. They lead mostly different lifestyles. It’s odd that most of her life she aspired to one, but landed the other.

      • notasugarhere says:

        Bettyrose, being married-in (not born royal) and having produced kids means you’re expendable. See Diana, Fergie, Lord Snowdon, and Anne’s first husband.

      • Bettyrose says:

        Nota, fair point, but surely being mom to future king should give her confidence to not feel inferior to born nobility? (Who I’m distinguishing ftom born royals.)

      • notasugarhere says:

        But her status is unchanged. She isn’t a member of the aristocracy and is only royal by marriage.

    • Deedee says:

      So, why do a Vogue fashion shoot at all if you have no interest in fashion?

      • Fire&Blood says:

        +1

      • Jan says:

        Because her MIL did and Kate is all about trying to be like Diana. Sadly for Kate that’ll never happen because Diana had natural charisma, charm and worked hard for her causes. Waity has none of these and deep down i think she knows it.

      • Sarah says:

        I dont know but that picture in the striped shirt made me scared for Kate. Her midsection is practically disappearing from view, she is so skinny. I think she had, and has, an eating disorder and is very unhappy in the role her mother chose for her.

    • INeedANap says:

      If she was uninterested in fashion but interested in using her position to further various causes, most of the Celebitchy commentariat would be defending her to the rafters. Princess Anne is someone who has never really been “fashionable” but she works constantly and has done a lot of good.

      Kate needs to do something. And no, being a mom is not enough in her position.

      • Rb says:

        I was wondering why all the “Kate Hate” was happening, but I think you just summed it all up so perfectly for me. She does need to do SOMETHING.

    • littlemissnaughty says:

      She doesn’t seem interested in much at all, does she? Except being at home with the kids. Married the wrong dude for that.

      • MinnFinn says:

        Her interests are whatever interests Normal Bill. She allegedly planned her entire gap year, switched from Edinburgh to St. Andrews, chose Art HIstory, learned to shoot, took SCUBA and flying lessons only because those are also the interests of Normal Bill.

  6. MunichGirl says:

    Were there official numbers re the sales of this edition?

  7. Digital Unicorn (aka Betti) says:

    “admirable and surprising lack of vanity” – ha, guess all that money she spends on botox and fillers is ‘everyday’ for her. Please she’s a vain, vapid women who is all about the media attention and even resorts to flashing her bits to the worlds press to get it. This is the girl who used to ask paps to send her the photo’s they took of her and Pippa falling drunk out of clubs for the ‘family scrapbook’.

    I agree that Kate has no real interest in fashion – it shows every time she steps out the door in her poorly tailored and badly put together outfits.

    This is Schulman doing PR damage control considering the cover was panned and sold very badly considering it was an anniversary cover. It also proved that Waity is not the draw she once was.

  8. Indira says:

    People and magazines started to compare her to Jecca after that. Must have pi$$ed her off.

  9. Ravenna says:

    So she is vain and socially awkward. That’s hardly surprising news for us who have been following her for years. I have never met her but it’s so easy to tell from photos that this is a woman who is not at all comfortable in her own skin.

    • Citresse says:

      She was managed by others since day one. I sometimes wonder when exactly the two networks merged ie- Royal courtiers + others meeting Middleton et al.

  10. Spiderpigg says:

    Beginning to believe the rumours she’s suffering from depression.

    • Digital Unicorn (aka Betti) says:

      Not sure about depression, its likely she suffers from social anxiety – you can see the awkwardness during her engagements, esp her solo ones (she’s not so bad if Willy’s there). I used to suffer from it but took acting classes for years which greatly helped me overcome my anxieties in social situations and am much more confident. I still have minor issues being in very noisy settings with large groups of people – i can get sensory overloaded.

      She can get help do deal with whatever anxieties she has with public life, TQ isn’t the most outgoing person (she seems rather shy) but she has worked through it. Its a skill that can be worked on with practice and she (Waity) has shown no interest in improving herself.

      • Deedee says:

        JMO, but she seems more anxious when Normal Bill is there. Maybe he bites her head off about what he perceives as mistakes afterward? She seems much less tense when Harry or of course, Ben Ainslie, are around.

      • notasugarhere says:

        She shows no social anxiety when around celebrities or Ben Ainslie.

      • Digital Unicorn (aka Betti) says:

        Oh i know that around certain people (read: men) she’s perfectly relaxed but thats not very often.

      • Olenna says:

        @nota, ITA. She gets her flirt on with no problem when she’s receiving attractive males’ attention and has no problem schmoozing with celebrities. IMO, Katie Bucket is insecure about her appearance but still vain and lazy, not depressed and suffering from some behavioral disorder.

      • Jessica says:

        She probably feels more confident around celebrities because they are supposed to make people feel comfortable and be charming; she also likes sports so she’s more relaxed with athletes. It’s not surprising to me she’s uncomfortable around highly educated and/or ‘upper-class’ people.

    • The dormouse says:

      About to write the same thing. And depression and social anxiety can go together.

  11. bread says:

    “She didn’t want to be dressed as a fashion plate”

    – yes, you definitely don’t want to dress in the latest fashions when you’re posing for *Vogue*!

    And “not being comfortable at the end of a lens” is just a nice description for a mediocre and uncooperative model.

  12. Div says:

    I’ve always thought Kate would have been happier married to someone like terribly (or moderately) wealthy James. Essentially, I bet her ideal life would have involved being a wealthy stay at home mom in a family that wasn’t held to a particularly strict social code. I suspect she went after the titles because that is what Carol wanted for her kids. Even Pippa seems to have more “energy” and is more into doing public charity and activities.

    • isakka says:

      I also think she would be happier with a Sir Ben Ainslie (just look at the pics when she’s together with him), it’s her mother who wanted the future king William.

    • Minxx says:

      I think part of Kate’s problem is that her mom never let her grow up. Kate doesn’t know who she is and what she wants – her mom has been molding her in her own image from day one. She’s totally dependent on on Carol for everything and this is the main reason she has no style and no personality. I can’t believe they let her wear this top for a Vogue shoot.

      • notasugarhere says:

        Or her mom let her never grow up. Carole exists to be the adult in this party of three, keeping this relationship duct taped together at any cost. That includes enabling both W&K to live the irresponsible extended adolescence they prefer.

    • K says:

      I agree. She’d be a perfect City wife – lots of money, time to spoil and indulge the children, and her sole role to look pretty, shop, choose interior decor, holidays, clothes for everyone and schools for the kids, and cater to her very busy alpha male husband. She’d enjoy that life and it would suit her interests and skills. Instead, she’s in line to be the woman’s half of our partnership model heads of state.

      • sarah says:

        ITA. When people criticized Kate, I would always reply she was doing what most wives of rich husbands do – shop, do lunch, go on vacation, etc. But William is more than just rich, he also has a title and the responsibilities that go with it. And neither of them are really interested in that!

      • Zaratustra says:

        I think that rich men’s wives do two things that Waity would hate:

        1. They actively care about their social status by doing charity or doing some kind of art activity like sitting on some art comitee/counsel or they organise some kind of charity / art / political party to raise funds. The important thing about these activities is to be SEEN by the right people aka their peers and above and to be perceived as “pillars of society” aka an important person with social gravitas. This is often combined either with personal interests in some areas or it is simply something you have to do because all your friends/business partners do this and like this so you do this and like this, too.
        Waity would hate to do that as she hates it already.

        2. Rich men’s wives do entertain business colleages/ friends privately. There are intimate dinners at home as well as bigger parties. This does interlope with #1.

        Waity has never understood that being rich or being upper class (or aristo) comes with a lot of obligations. A lot of them. And they aren’t clearly spelled out as the obligations in your employment contract. She thought it would just be fun fun fun.

      • Didn’t she join a women’s guild or club somewhere?

  13. Barrett says:

    I like the photo near the fence. The hat though my god she needed to call it in, that did her no justice.

  14. Erica says:

    Nobody is buying that kate is this down home girl considering all Kate does is shop and go to hair appointments.The cover was horrible and I have never found her to be a great beauty or a fashion icon.

  15. addie says:

    Kate comes across as a dull, incurious woman so no surprises. Shulman is trying to get back in the game with one hit – her ‘coup’ subject matter who turned out to be not so stellar after all. It’s embarrassing for all concerned that the issue did not sell well; that also points to lack of interest in the ‘young’ British royals, so the future may not be rosy. Kate seems to live in her own very small, vacuous world. Her actions say more about what she is wanting to be – aristocratic, country set – and her determination to play the part rather than be it. Just a dead lazy woman.

    • ArtHistorian says:

      Sometime ago I saw a documentary where a journalist followed Schulman and her staff for a period of time, which included the period where she secured Kate for the centennial cover. That doc didn’t paint a very flattering portrait of Schulman – she shot down all the visually interesting cover options in favour of safe, boring ones and she kept her entire staff completely in the dark about the shoot with Kate. She even had her graphic designer work on a cover without photos because the centennial issue needed something different to stand out – at least that was what she told the woman who she worked closely with on every single cover.

      Her staff didn’t take being kept completely in the dark very well. I did feel that Schulman wasn’t a particularly good leader since she contually shot down her staff’s creative suggestions. She certainly wasn’t interested in anyone’s opinion but her own, even though she said she was. I have worked for someone like that and it is just disappointing and discouaging. However, the completely secrecy with which she conducted the Kate affair seemed odd so I can’t help but suspect that total secrecy was a condition laid out by the Cambridges.

      • jetlagged says:

        Do you remember the name of the doc? I love getting glimpses behind the scenes. The September Issue, First Monday in May, and Dior and I were so much fun. Oprah produced one on Tom Ford that I could watch on a loop.

      • ArtHistorian says:

        Sadly, I don’t. It was on Danish television so it also had another title and it was a while ago.

      • LAK says:

        Jetlagged: it’s called ‘Absolute Fashion: Inside British Vogue’

      • Digital Unicorn (aka Betti) says:

        I used to work at CN UK and can verify that she runs that mag with an iron fist – everyone is scared of her, even long term staffers and senior CN management. Her ‘feud’ with Anna Wintour is legendary, they really can’t stand each other, mainly because Wintour did not want Schulman taking over after her saying that she wasn’t up to the job. In my opinion Wintour has since been proven correct.

        I can’t wait to see what the new guy does – Vogue UK has desperately needed new vision for a LONG time.

      • Zaratustra says:

        I think Shulman got instructions from certain people how to deal with Kate.
        Buckingham Palace does probably remember that charity event which Kate organised and which made her look like a ladette in the tabloids. Because our dear Waity wore hotpants for that charity roller disco event and there are pics of her laying on the floor with her legs spread apart.

        Then after Bill and Waity’s marriage Waity wanted to do a cover for Vogue. The Queen did forbid that. So I guess that Waity was finally given permission to do a Vogue cover but it had to be boring and unremarkable in every way.
        That must have been the time when Shulman got her “instructions”.

        So no, I doubt that Shulman is a bad leader because she has been at the head of British Vogue for years. She wouldn’t have gotten the job nor kept it for so long if she wasn’t somewhat good.

        Shulman can still brag about being the first to get Kate on a fashion cover. She probably couldn’t let that opportunity pass despite all the restrictions she got from Buckingham Palace.

        Shulman must have known that that cover shoot was no good. She is in fashion for too long to not know or to not listen to her staff. She published it nevertheless. My guess is that she was under pressure.

        British Vogue has a problem: The concept of the Vogue magazine just doesn’t fit well with British fashion. British (high) fashion is divided into two opposed groups. British fashion is either terribly “edgy” which isn’t for Vogue because it lacks that certain elegance. Or British fashion is terribly conservative in the way British Aristos are conservative and that isn’t Vogue’s cup of tea either. I think they should simply break with Vogue’s concept and go for some more edgy. But if Shulman is that submissive to the Royals then I doubt she would develop a new way for her magazine.

  16. Fire&Blood says:

    Dear Shulman,

    We’re not drinking the Kool-Aid.

    Sincerely,
    Those of us with brains

    … I wonder how long it’ll take for the sycophants to appear to scold people about their mean comments…

  17. Sparkle says:

    Girl needs a stylist. she is dressed for an Eddie Bauer catalog

  18. Talie says:

    I’d take Kate’s behavior over what we’ve heard about the York girls at photoshoots being totally neurotic and over the top. She’s a natural beauty and is aware of it, clearly. No one calls her ugly. I also like the bit about her being present and not on her phone the whole time.

    • Lainey says:

      Funny that, cause I’ve only ever heard the opposite about the York girls. Always described as lovely polite girls. Not to mention they haven’t done many shoots. Beatrice hasn’t done one in years. And Eugenie’s one last year was her first since her Tatler one at 18.

      • Lilly says:

        I love those girls. They seem fun, funny and caring.

      • FLORC says:

        Eug did 1 maybe a year ago. Posing in a gorgeous floral gown. There was nothing of an attitude. That was during a specific time the York’s were being tossed under to distract from kate. If there was any misstep we would have heard about it.

      • LAK says:

        The media is not interested in protecting the Yorkies. If they so much as look at a person the wrong way, it’s front page news. If they exhibited any neurotic, OTT behaviour, we would have heard about it by now.

      • Digital Unicorn (aka Betti) says:

        I have met Eugenie, she is lovely and down to earth. Have been told B is just the same.

  19. Lainey says:

    She was probably not comfortable because she couldn’t do her failsafe maniacal laugh and hand gestures. No crotch clutching either. She might have learned something if that had styled her and done her make up instead of doing it the same way it’s always done.

  20. Jennifer says:

    Most telling to me is that she didn’t check her phone once. She didn’t check if Maria had called, texted about the kids? She had no interest in checking they were fine? That is so at odds how I am when away from my boys. Even when I completely trust who is looking after them, it’s still instinctual for a mum to check on her children, or at least check she hasn’t missed an important call about them.

    • MinnFinn says:

      I would not read too much into Kate not checking her phone. The photoshoot supposedly took place at Amner Hall property where they live. So Maria, the kids and probably Carole were less than 1 mile away. In fact I’d bet money that Carole was at Amner the day of that photoshoot.

      • notasugarhere says:

        We’re told it took place at Anmer, but Anmer doesn’t have land associated with it. It has the house, garage, garden, and new $100,000 tennis court, but not land.

        Nor does Anmer have a barn, horses, or hay, which leads me to believe the photos of their daughter in a barn weren’t taken at Anmer either. These photo shoots might have taken place somewhere on the Sandringham estate, but from what we’ve seen of Anmer from aerial photos, this isn’t it. Given William’s privacy obsession, that wouldn’t surprise me.

    • Bridget says:

      That’s you. If my kids are with someone I trust and who knows the ropes I don’t really check, especially if it’s just for the day.

      Not to mention, Carol had to be there.

    • sendepause says:

      Lol, what did mothers even do with their instincts before the invention of (cell)phones?

  21. Natalie S says:

    If Kate were genuinely uncomfortable with the spotlight, she would have shared it with her staff and charities to take some of the focus off of her. Those country shots were a carefully calculated decision for her image with no thought to anyone else.

    I don’t think even Kate’s fans would claim she isn’t obsessed with how she’s perceived. She approaches royal life like she’s acting out scenes in a midmarket catalog.

    • Digital Unicorn (aka Betti) says:

      She approaches royal life like its an episode of Downton Abbey – her and her mother’s favourite show.

      • notasugarhere says:

        Second favorite? Earlier in the marriage (or around the engagement?) she admitted to loving TOWIE.

  22. graymatters says:

    That was a disappointing photo shoot on so many levels, but the only news here is that she didn’t check her phone. It makes sense, though, because she wouldn’t have to deal with any work issues, her husband wouldn’t need to talk to her (I’m thinking of the “I have sex waiting for me” comment while they were dating), and her children were with a trusted caregiver. I just don’t think of her as having any friends close enough to send a quick text to, either. She just seems to live a lonely, dull life. Which makes the photo shoot an accurate portrayal of her after all.

    • guest says:

      What’s up with that “I have sex waiting for me” comment?

      • LAK says:

        William is incredibly indiscreet for someone obsessed with his privacy.

      • ABC says:

        If I recall correctly it was during one of their ski holidays whilst they were dating. Willie’s pals invited him to the pub but he declined commenting that he had ‘good sex waiting’ (ie Kate) back at the chalet. I may be wrong though so please correct me anyone!

      • Digital Unicorn (aka Betti) says:

        Didn’t he also make a comment about how he had ‘sex whenever he wanted’ in reference to Waity? Not sure when that was or even if they were ‘on’.

      • LAK says:

        Not to mention the time he discussed his preferred boob size at a dinner party – thanks Uncle Gary.

      • FLORC says:

        Uncle Gary! Someone get that man a drink and record the resulting conversation! He’s been missed. And he’s a shady figure. Breaking drug and human rights laws, I’m sure.

    • PrincessK says:

      Hmmm…I recall that he considered more than a handful a waste.

  23. Margo S. says:

    Those photos from her vogue shoot actually make me embarrassed. Can’t even believe how horrible her makeup and brows were.

  24. Bitsy says:

    I think Will and the waity years taxed her sense of self greatly. I’ve followed her for a long time because i think she is pretty and very grounded. Before the engagement she seemed to be very interested in sports, outdoors activity, and helping under privileged youth get involved in sports they may not normally be able to afford. I think those waity years were spent grooming her to the point that everything about her has been tailored and suppressed. I blame Wills and the firm for thinking they are PR geniuses… If they let her get involved in charities of her own interest she may just shine. Which William would hate coincidently. My opinion obviously not fact tho

    • Erica says:

      I don’t recall Kate helping under privileged kids with sports when did that happen?All I ever knew of her
      attempt at charity work was the race she dropped out of when William took her back and some sort of skate event where she bullied Beatrice.I never heard of anything other than her working a couple days at jigsaw then quiting,shopping, vacationing, clubbing,and guarding William from other women.Kate chased William and now she has title and can shop endlessly. I don’t think William and the firm are holding her back Kate is doing what she has always has done and that is not work.

      • Zaratustra says:

        I don’t recall Waity doing any charity except for two failures:
        1. dropping out of a charity boat race
        2. roller disco charity, Waity lay on the floor with her legs spread apart, very claaaaahhhhsssy

    • Larissa says:

      Sorry, I’ve been following Kate since she first appeared as William’s girlfriend. There has never been a story of her working with underpriveliged kids. During the girlfriend years she neither did any voluntary work nor charity. During that time she only shopped and partied. Her 10 month long job, which was only two to three days a week, she only did due to the criticism she had reveived in the press. Mum Carole organized the job for her.

      I don’t know where you have gotten that info from, but it’s a lie.

    • LAK says:

      The only time Kate did anything remotely charitable was her stint in Chile before university when she was chasing William.

      After that, nada.

    • notasugarhere says:

      1) I don’t think the firm would have picked her, so the waiting is all on William dragging his feet not the firm taking time grooming her. If the firm had groomed her, she’d appear professional and groomed.

      2) almost no work or charity work for the 10 years prior to the engagement

      3) They need to be doing minimum 500 engagements a year each. Do you think all the rest of the royals are interested in every church opening, country fair, hospital, or factory they visit? No. But they are professionals, so they do the job without ever showing a lack of interest.

      As Queen Mary was said to snap at a younger royal who was whining about doing royal engagements. ‘You are a member of the British royal family. We are never tired, and we all love hospitals.’

      • Cerys says:

        I think you have summed it up perfectly. The queen has pandered to Whiny and Waity for too long. There is no way they are ever going to complete 500 appearances each every year. There will be one excuse after another.

      • Digital Unicorn (aka Betti) says:

        Queen Mary would have whipped whiney into place in no time, she had no patience for lazy whingers. Saying that she also wouldn’t have allowed Waity and her grifter family anywhere near the royal institution.

      • Bridget says:

        She let Philip and Mountbatten near. They may have a little shinier pedigree, but it’s not like that wasn’t some major social climbing.

      • notasugarhere says:

        She was said not to like Philip early on, because she thought he was a socialist. Not a social climber, a socialist-or-republican who wanted to see the end of the monarchy because he thought it was useless. He had too much to say about how royalty needed to get their act together and earn their keep, an attitude she agreed with but apparently not to the same extent.

      • LAK says:

        In terms of wealth, Philip was a social climber, but in terms of pedigree, he married down. He is 100% royal, having both parents being royal. The Queen, on the otherhand, is only half royal. Her mother wasn’t royal, only an aristocrat.

        Being royal is an important distinction and made improbable marriages including the Queen’s own grandmother who was deemed suitable despite her being an improverished Serene Highness with disgraced parents in a decreasing marriage market of proper royal spouses.

      • Seraphina says:

        Notasugarhere, alas the days of QM the royals believed it was a privilege to be in the inner circle and on earth had to carry their weight to be allowed the lifestyle. I think these royals (not doing their share) think it’s entitlement. I like the days of QM, because it is a privilege to be allowed into the riches they live in.

        That said, I also agree that QM would not allow Middletons access to THE ROYAL family.

      • Bridget says:

        @LAK: he was a Greek prince. That doesn’t count when talking about pedigree.

      • LAK says:

        Bridget: He doesn’t have a drop of Greek blood in his veins despite being a Greek Prince, and in anycase we are not talking about titles.

        He is a direct great, great grandson of Victoria via her daughter Alice.

        Further, via his father, he is a direct great grandson of Christian 9 of Denmark. Between Victoria and Christian, the current crop of European royal families are directly descended.

        Philip is therefore 100% royal on both sides.

        On her side, the Queen can only boast of only her paternal connection to the royal club ie being the great, great granddaughter of Victoria. To put it crudely, she is a half-blood prince.

  25. cindyp says:

    This story is so odd. I truly believe Kate was trying to emulate Jecca Craig & failed miserably. This woman is so uncomfortable in her own skin. Who in their right mind wouldn’t want to glam it up for a Vogue cover? Imagine how beautiful she would have looked if she had let them dress & style her.

  26. HoustonGrl says:

    “Not even checking herself in the mirror.” Who is she kidding? Kate is obsessed over her appearance. I think she’s intensely self scrutinizing to an extreme.

  27. ABC says:

    Now I never bought the Vogue, have only seen the pictures on here but didn’t I read somewhere that Kate did no accompanying interview? It was just pictures? Hardly surprising it didn’t sell then and what a missed opportunity (if true) for her to big up her charities. Plus the fact that looking good / professional is in her job description, I’d bite the hand off an opportunity to work with real fashion professionals and get lots of free advice. How can anyone be so uninterested / uninteresting?!?!

    As for the pictures, what a mess. As a ‘country’ worker I side-eye anyone who thinks denim and the country are a good mix. Trust me on this, you can NEVER get cow muck out a pair of jeans. In fact, there’s a reason we all wear leggings / jodhpurs / all in one coveralls and Kate’s fashion shoot exemplifies it. Totally impractical and falling off her backside. And that hat would be off in the slightest breeze and be upside down in a puddle completely ruined. Oh dear. End of rant!

  28. Disco Dancer says:

    Kate is uncomfortable with anything that comes close to resembling “work”. Modelling and pulling different faces for the camera to provide an image, embody the photographers vision and/or provoke discussion, still requires work.

  29. PettyRiperton says:

    Those Vogue pictures are tragic, Kate is only comfortable with being wifey to Willy, spending father in law Chuck’s money and being unless.

  30. The dormouse says:

    When we learned that Kate was advised to lose weight and publicly parade in underwear in order to win Wills back we could have predicted what it would do to her sense of self.

    Many stories of celebrities with troubled lives (think Judy Garland) are later seen to have started with weight criticism or sexual abuse or both.

    • Digital Unicorn (aka Betti) says:

      The weight loss things goes way back to when she was at school. Apparently the boys ranked the girls out of 10 and Kate didn’t even make the rankings, so during the summer she lost weight and had a makeover which was aimed at getting boys attention. Kate has always been slender, she’s quite athletic but she does have body issues. You just need to look at how thin she became before her wedding – i saw the exhibition with her wedding dress and that waist was tiny.

      • The dormouse says:

        Yes, her weight loss for the wedding was dramatic. Is it any wonder she has trouble occupying space when being not doing so is what gains her praise?

  31. Joannie says:

    I really like the cover shot. I think it captures her well. Nice smile right through to her eyes. The other not so much. I picture Kate as somewhat shy and reserved but comfortable with herself. The HW glamour look is not her taste nor mine for that matter. A ton of makeup and sparkly jewellery she doesnt need. She’s a beautiful girl all on her own. Ive said this before pictures do not do her justice.

  32. Egla says:

    My friends and I were having a coffee this past weekend and someone decided we needed a group photo to commemorate the event. So there were 20 min of lipstick application, the use of three different phones at hand to find out which was the better one with the best color display and several shoots to choose from and in the end it didn’t even make it to Instagram BECAUSE the light was not right. My friends would not be caught dead without makeup or bad hair not for a single photo imagine if they were called from Vogue. (I wore sunglasses inside just in case I looked bad).

    I have no doubts that she cares about her apparence. It’s just that maybe she has to take the advice of someone who knows what he/she is doing. She has a good figure, nice face, gorgeous hair. She could do so much in terms of presence.

    In the end I have to say something from my experience. IF I decide or have to wear something I put it on and once I’m out of he door I own it whatever it might be. Usually I opt for something I like and it fits me. I don’t dress to please everybody. Maybe she feels and looks awkward most of the time because although she spends a lot of money she doesn’t like or feels comfortable with what she is wearing day to day and she lacks the confidence to make the outfit part of herself even for 2 hours. If she had worked before and struggled with everyday workwear maybe…….

    • Zaratustra says:

      I think you have a point. Kate dresses to prove she “belongs” into the aristocracy. The point is: if you have to prove it then you don’t have it.

  33. Nic919 says:

    I can’t wait for Meghan’s Vogue cover.

    • LAK says:

      Especially styled by the new editor of Vogue. It will be *epic.

      *the new editor has a very good style and i can’t wait for his tenure. If MM submits to his styling, we shall be in for a treat.

  34. CrystalBall says:

    The pic with her in the striped shirt – she has no confidence. Check out her posture with hunched shoulders hiding her chest. Sad – she
    represents Heads Together but maybe she should get herself together. Eating disorders are a huge part of women’s mental health yet she does not support any of those charities.

  35. Maria says:

    If she doesn’t like clothes, why does she spend so much on her wardrobes?

  36. PrincessK says:

    It has been said that the Queen loves Kate. I wonder if that is because she is so grateful not to have a repeat of Diana.

  37. crazydaisy says:

    I think she looks pretty on the cover, but then again, she looks like someone else. A pretty someone else. But not herself.