California strengthens sexual harassment laws after lobbying by Arquette, Sorvino


Like many of you, I’m looking forward to the midterm elections – for the most part. On the one hand, I’ll enjoy watching Congress flip, but on the other hand, I’ll have to say goodbye to our governor, which breaks my heart. Even when I very decidedly do not agree with him, I can see the advantages of his larger picture (except for the stupid bullet train, that one eludes me). California governor Jerry Brown began finalizing his time in Sacramento by sorting through 183 bills over the weekend. Among them were four very important bills addressing sexual harassment, which were lobbied by Hollywood survivors, Rosanna Arquette, Mira Sorvino and Chantal Cousineau.

California Gov. Jerry Brown signed into law Sunday four bills designed to toughen the state’s enforcement of sexual harassment laws and make it easier for victims to pursue civil claims. The Golden State also enacted a law mandating that public companies based in California have at least one female board member by the end of next year.

The bills were part of a package heavily supported by entertainment industry figures in response to the outpouring of sexual misconduct claims during the past year. One component of the package that did not make it all the way to the governor’s signature was a bid to ban arbitration clauses in employment agreements — a common feature in entertainment industry contracts that has help shield harassment cases from public view.

Actors Rosanna Arquette, Mira Sorvino and Chantal Cousineau were among the industry players who lobbied for the legislation, dubbed the “Take the Lead” bills as the laws put California at the forefront of efforts to combat systemic abuse that women across all industries often face. All four were sponsored by Democratic female state senators.

[From Variety]

California will now do what it does best and pat itself on the back for how progressive we appear to be. Don’t get me wrong, these bills are huge and those who worked on them deserve to be lauded, but I’m not sure those outside California know just how treacherous it is for women and minorities in our work landscape. Among our top industries are agriculture, technology, education and entertainment. I’ll leave the farmers alone (simply because I don’t have the stats to back it up) but Silicon Valley, Hollywood and some major university scandals have shined a light on just how much of a cesspool it is. Moving forward, though, two of the bills focus on broadening the perimeters of sexual harassment, especially as it pertains to the definition of “employer.” This is important because so much of tech and entertainment is comprised of freelance or independent contractors who were, prior to these bills, unprotected. They also do more to protect minors, primarily within entertainment. Senate Bill 1343 broadens the requirements for sexual harassment training. Speaking from experience, the required sexual harassment training in California has thus far been a joke – a really bad joke. The fourth bill requires board of directors to add more women. These changes will be huge and I’m especially grateful to the victims like Mira, Rosanna and Chantal who fought to make things better for the rest of us.

And just one more shout-out to Linda Ronstadt’s ex, Gov. Brown signed a bill with the strictest set of protections on net neutrality to date, which could be adopted by other states. The current administration got so ticked off, they’re already suing California. It’s a great bill and I’m sure Brown fully supports it, but I promise you he giggled while signing it thinking about #45’s face when he read it.

Embed from Getty Images




Photo credit: WENN photos, Getty Images and Twitter

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

10 Responses to “California strengthens sexual harassment laws after lobbying by Arquette, Sorvino”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Elle says:

    Do we really think that quota laws for public companies are progressive? Or maybe they’ll just incite companies to relocate?

    • Jag says:

      Yeah, I don’t agree with that one, even though I wish that there were more women at the top of companies.

  2. Rapunzel says:

    Cue the “Any woman can ruin your husband, son, or brother’s life with an accusation! We must protect our men from evil, lying women!” crowd. Cause even in 2018, some women would rather believe the man in the t*ts and cl*ts fraternity instead of a woman.

  3. Astrid says:

    I have a soft spot for California. The state always seem to be way more progressive and on the cutting edge.

  4. Esmom says:

    “I’m not sure those outside California know just how treacherous it is for women and minorities in our work landscape.”

    I honestly had not considered that before. Kudos to Governor Brown and to the women who fought to get these bills to his desk. In my state, no way would these protections be on the radar.

  5. Eric says:

    I love my state because we lead the country in sound politics like this ruling plus the net neutrality law (we are being sued by Sessions and the EZ admin), our environmental stance, and OUR OPEN ARMS POLICY TO IMMIGRANTS!

  6. Lala11_7 says:

    Los Angeles District Attorney’s Office has one of the LOWEST rates in the country for bringing rapists to trial and have had this issue…FOR DECADES!!! The stories of women/men/children being DENIED due process after their alleged attacks is staggering…and suspect AF…

    How about starting with that right there….

    • Mare says:

      For decades, women didn’t report harassment or worse. How is the district attorneys office suppose to bring justice when crimes weren’t reported?
      You can’t get due process if you don’t report a crime when it happened and it’s hard to prove decades later.

  7. Ellis says:

    They passed the placebo, and didn’t sign the most important bid – the ban on arbitration clauses in employment agreements. That’s where some real change would have had to take place.