Jennifer Aniston: ‘My marriages, they’ve been very successful, in… my opinion’

JA Cover_Sub

Jennifer Aniston covers the January issue of Elle Magazine, and the Elle editors did her dirty with this photoshoot. I know what they were going for – some sort of high/low desert-like scenes where she looks windblown and not glam-perfect. But her makeup is off and the lighting is off too, which means Elle mostly used the shots where her hair is in her face. It doesn’t matter that much, because the interview is one of the most intensive she’s done in months – you can see/read the editorial here. Some highlights:

Fairy tales don’t exist: “We live in a society that messages women: By this age, you should be married; by this age, you should have children. That’s a fairy tale. That’s the mold we’re slowly trying to break out of.”

The tabloid narratives that have dominated her public persona: “Maybe it has everything to do with what they’re lacking in their own life… Why do we want a happy ending? How about just a happy existence? A happy process? We’re all in process constantly. What quantifies happiness in someone’s life isn’t the ideal that was created in the ’50s. It’s not like you hear that narrative about any men. That’s part of sexism—it’s always the woman who’s scorned and heartbroken and a spinster. It’s never the opposite.”

Her marriages were successful: “I don’t feel a void. I really don’t. My marriages, they’ve been very successful, in [my] personal opinion. And when they came to an end, it was a choice that was made because we chose to be happy, and sometimes happiness didn’t exist within that arrangement anymore. Sure, there were bumps, and not every moment felt fantastic, obviously, but at the end of it, this is our one life and I would not stay in a situation out of fear. Fear of being alone. Fear of not being able to survive. To stay in a marriage based on fear feels like you’re doing your one life a disservice. When the work has been put in and it doesn’t seem that there’s an option of it working, that’s okay. That’s not a failure. We have these clichés around all of this that need to be reworked and retooled, you know? Because it’s very narrow-minded thinking.”

What we’re doing by focusing on her marital or motherhood status: “You’re diminishing everything I have succeeded at, and that I have built and created. It’s such a shallow lens that people look through. It’s the only place to point a finger at me as though it’s my damage—like it’s some sort of a scarlet letter on me that I haven’t yet procreated, or maybe won’t ever procreate.”

Her mother screwed her up: “She was from this world of, ‘Honey, take better care of yourself,’ or ‘Honey, put your face on,’ or all of those odd sound bites that I can remember from my childhood. My mom said those things because she really loved me. It wasn’t her trying to be a bitch or knowing she would be making some deep wounds that I would then spend a lot of money to undo. She did it because that was what she grew up with. ‘You want to be happy. It’s hard for big girls.’ She was missing what was [actually] important. I think she was just holding on and doing the best she could, struggling financially and dealing with a husband who was no longer there. Being a single mom in the ’80s I’m sure was pretty crappy.”

Childhood goals: “I also was never a kid who sat around and dreamed about a wedding, you know? Those were never my fantasies. When I was first popped the question, it was so foreign to me. My priorities weren’t about finding partnership and who am I gonna marry and what am I gonna wear on my wedding day. I was building houses with shoe boxes and toilet paper and felt. It was always about finding a home that felt safe. And I’m sure, because I was from a divorced-parent home, that was another reason I wasn’t like, ‘Well, that looks like a great institution.’ ”

Whether she’ll have kids: She admits the prospect always felt “quite honestly, kind of frightening.” She continues, “Some people are just built to be wives and have babies. I don’t know how naturally that comes to me… Who knows what the future holds in terms of a child and a partnership— how that child comes in…or doesn’t? And now with science and miracles, we can do things at different times than we used to be able to.”

[From Elle]

I don’t disagree with anything she has to say, and these are topics she’s been talking about for several years now. What bugs me is that Jennifer always seems to abdicate her own role in her tabloid narratives over the years, like the images were just foisted upon her out of nowhere, like she isn’t the favorite client of one of the most powerful managers/Svengalis in Hollywood, like she hasn’t participated, over the years, in painting a certain sad-sack/wronged-woman/good-girl portrait of herself. As for what she says about “marriages,” plural, not working out… I still feel like I’m hallucinating. Were Jennifer and Justin Theroux legally married or what?

JA Cover_Newsstand

JA1

Covers and photos courtesy of Zoey Grossman for ELLE Magazine, sent from promotional Elle email.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

109 Responses to “Jennifer Aniston: ‘My marriages, they’ve been very successful, in… my opinion’”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Maya says:

    I like this new non victim Jennifer but come on.

    If she means her two marriages were successful in terms of PR, then yes, they probably were successful.

    Marrying and divorcing Brad turned her into America’s sweetheart.

    Pretending to marry Justin stopped people from feeling sorry for her.

    And yes, it really bugs me how Jennifer always gets away with everything in the media.

    • StellainNH says:

      The only way to have a successful marriage is to be still married to the same person. She really has a bizarre way of defining marriage.

      • a reader says:

        Stella I take major issue with what you just said. I find it incredibly sanctimonious.

        I’m divorced. Like Jennifer, I consider my marriage to be very successful. When we met we were two very messed up young people and we made our relationship work for 16 years. Considering I came from an abusive broken home, and he came from a fundamentalist family, and considering all the growth we experienced together which culminated in an amicable divorce when we realized we were growing in different directions…. We helped each other through college, we helped each other to heal from our childhoods, we helped each other become the thriving adults we are today. We simply grew apart and found we weren’t suited to each other anymore. He remains the great love of my young life and we are both very happy now.

        THAT is a success.

      • Mariposa says:

        A-MEN!! Would we only consider a friendship “successful” if we were friends with exactly the same people we started school with?! It’s called growth…

      • lingli says:

        And you, Stella, have a really narrow view of what makes a relationship successful.

      • HappyFeetGladFeet says:

        a reader but you were together for 16 years. Aniston was married to Pitt for only 4.5 years, and two of those years, by the admission of both, they were in marriage counselling for, and the last year of their marriage both admitted they lived apart. That isn’t a successful marriage by anyone’s definition. They barely got out of the honeymoon phase before it collapsed!

    • Still_Sarah says:

      I have to give some support to Stella here. Yes, I think the relationship can be a success if the two people are able to rebuild some kind of respectful post-marriage relationship where they treat each other with dignity and are willing to look at the good and bad of their marriage without blinders on (no one is the villian). But I think that when two people divorce, they have to acknowledge that the marriage itself is no longer viable – it is not a success. To me, these are two different things.

  2. babsjohnson says:

    Wow. Her face!! There’s more here than bad make-up, isn’t it?
    Also I wish she shut down the whole questioning about children.

  3. Birdix says:

    “ I would not stay in a situation out of fear. Fear of being alone. Fear of not being able to survive. To stay in a marriage based on fear feels like you’re doing your one life a disservice.“
    This is a lot easier to say when you have millions in the bank…

    • Diana says:

      This!

    • Thirsty Hirsty says:

      EXACTLY what I thought too. So, she’s shaming women that won’t abandon her kids? She’s shaming women who …. oh, I just can NOT!!

      • eto says:

        Sorry, you have to abandon your kids when you get divorced? New to me…

      • Jadedone says:

        Yeah reaching a whole bumch here

      • Shannon says:

        Huh? How does getting divorced equal abandoning your kids? I don’t think she was shaming anyone.

      • Sheryl says:

        Don’t know exactly what she meant here but…….. No getting divorced does not mean abandoning your children. However, unfortunately for many, it does. The parent is frequently busy trying to find dates, has children with the next person they marry who are sometimes favored (I’ve seen this in my relatives), putting up with sometimes an awful step-parent, using the children to get back at the other parent, working more to make ends meet, etc. The fall out from divorce (unless you do it like Gwenyth!!) is usually very emotionally hard on the children.

      • eto says:

        Hey Sheryl, I don’t think that is the norm. If parents fail their children so badly after a divorce, I’m sure that they were failing their children while they were married too. (Minus the working more to make ends meet!).

        People who stay together for their children don’t always realize that their kids can tell and know something major is wrong.

      • Tiffany :) says:

        Oh FFS. You’re going to pull a joint out of socket you are reaching so hard. She’s not shaming anyone.

      • Dita von Katzhausen says:

        She is not shaming anybody. She is simply stating the fact, that being in a marriage/relationship out of fear instead of love or commitment, is the wrong way to be. Every woman, who has to stay in a relationship, because they fear being alone, or struggling financially after a divorce, will tell you how wrong it is especially, when they can’t escape it. It is not always possible to leave the relationship, and sure it might be easier for Jen with all the money in the world and no kids, but she is not wrong here.

    • perplexed says:

      “This is a lot easier to say when you have millions in the bank…”

      That is her truth though. It is what is. If you are financially independent and have the freedom to make a choice, why would you stay in a marriage that doesn’t work because of something that’s been fed to you by society about the alleged terribleness of being alone?

    • WTW says:

      You all are making it sound as if regular women don’t get divorced every day. Women of all social classes divorce, and women from lower class backgrounds are more likely to be divorced/split up from partners, so, no, I think Jen’s statement still applies. She is not shaming anyone. And I’m not sure why you all are having this reaction unless you are unhappy married women staying in unfulfilling marriages. It seems like projection to me. Yes, divorce does put women at financial risk, but I can tell you I’d rather be single and broke than be in a horrible marriage.

      • Mariposa says:

        Yes, literally 50% of the married population gets divorced. You don’t have to be a 1 per-center to do it! I like what she said – don’t stay in something that’s not working because you’re scared of what’s on the other side.

      • Kitten says:

        Haha yeah that was my first thought as well. If divorce was only for the wealthy then why were 50% of my friends’ parents divorced by the time we were in middle school? Because I did NOT have rich friends.

        Also, if you’re rich divorce might be easier financially but that doesn’t mean that it’s not incredibly painful emotionally. I know we don’t like to believe this but rich people have feelings too.

  4. Jenns says:

    I liked that interview. And I relate to what she says so much. I’m approaching 40, and it’s weighing so heavy on my mind. I’ve made a choice to remain single and childless, but I still feel so much pressure to be what the world expects women to be. It’s tough.

    • Nancy says:

      I liked it too. She seems to be quite comfortable in her skin. Others are saying the money helps, and I’m sure it does. But, there are a lot of miserable rich people out there as well. I watched Dumplin over the weekend, and it was sappy but cute. Sometimes, it isn’t the prettiest, richest girl who is most beautiful inside. She considered herself married to Justin, whether it was common law or through a vow, it was a marriage to her.

      • Sue Denim says:

        I get the feeling she herself may have been unhappy at times, trying to live the old tropes of female success — marriage and children — and has finally come to a place where she’s defining success on her own terms, shedding societal expectations, and embracing what feels right for her. Or maybe I’m projecting, but that’s what resonates for me here…

      • Nancy says:

        Definitely. She had to go through a great deal of humiliation in front of the world. If that doesn’t make you strong, what will. When you get as famous as she is, there will always be those looking to knock you down. This site alone proves that point. She is almost 50 years old. I think she’s content. She stays off social media, which is a good thing! It can be so toxic.

    • SilverUnicorn says:

      I relate to this interview of hers so much, and I am married now.

      But I got married in my 40s, so I really liked what she said here and all the pressure I had to stand all my life because everybody else’s expectations were not met.

    • Kitten says:

      I’m completely with you, Jenns. 40 in a couple weeks–unmarried and child-free. It’s the right choice for myself and my partner but I would absolutely be lying if I said I was immune to the societal pressures and expectations.

    • Nia says:

      This is for Jenns. Do what makes you happy. I am 55 and never married. I am in a profession where being married is somewhat important for career advancement. I also did not chose to be a single mother. I just never met the right person until now.

    • Nancy says:

      Jenns: You will probably never see this, but….I didn’t read your entire post this am. I’m ready to have twins and am exhausted most of the time! I just wanted to say to live your life how you feel it should be lived, not society. I’m not a planner. Didn’t know I’d be married at 20, have my first child at 24 and at 39 getting ready for two more. Enjoy the ride, let things happen and don’t apologize for it! Life is tough, so make the most of it. I can tell you’re an overthinker. Don’t be. If you’re healthy, to me that is life’s greatest gift! xo

  5. CairinaCat says:

    They weren’t married legally or we would have seen the legal documents by now.
    And it wouldn’t have happened so fast.
    It takes forever to get a divorce in California, even if it’s a no fault uncontested one.
    One of my sisters is currently in the middle of a totally uncontested divorce, he never got a lawyer or responded. She filed almost two years ago :p

  6. lucy2 says:

    I like a lot of what she’s saying here, especially about the happy existence rather than the happy ending. I have a feeling she’s felt all this for a long time but wasn’t comfortable or confident enough to say it, with all the pressure put on women, especially famous women, to “have it all”.

    I watched Dumplin over the weekend, it was so good!

    • Esmom says:

      Yes. I felt so much pressure from my mom to meet her expectations of happiness for women. It’s like she couldn’t even fathom that my sister or I could be happy unless we checked those boxes of “marriage” and “motherhood.” I realize I have some bitterness at feeling like I needed to conform to these arbitrary milestones just to make her happy. Sigh.

    • Jegede says:

      I can’t wait to see Dumplin.

      And lol at the story persisting that the triangle made her.
      At the height of ‘Friends’ fame Aniston was one of the biggest US names internationally.

      I mean her haircut alone was copied by actresses and girl groups like All Saints.
      Only Princess Di and Farrah Fawcett had created the same stampede.

      In the UK, she was bigger than Jolie and certainly matched Pitt.

      • Nancy says:

        It was a cute movie. It typically isn’t the kind of movie I enjoy, but for this time of year, it was sweet. I actually shed a tear! Sadly, Brad will always be an asterisk at the end of her name. It was his and hers first marriage and both were young and in love. I try to avoid his threads and wish those who dislike Jennifer so much would avoid her threads if she annoys them so much. God, she has aged so well. Good living, but again, the critics will say money and surgery. That would be Courteney….but she’s trying now! Love em both.

      • Kitten says:

        ITA, Jegede.

    • SK says:

      I watched Dumplin’ too and I also thought it was cute. The one thing I don’t like is that healthy food and exercise is sneered at in the movie. I like the empowerment message and everything, but I find this whole: “ugh, salad!”, “look at those sad barbies running” attitude weird. We ate salad every day of my childhood – sometimes as a side, sometimes as a main – and I freaking love salad. I get that her mother was overly obsessed with image in a damaging way; but I find this glorification of unhealthy food (donuts, etc) and demonisation of healthy food in american media really strange and it seems to create a really damaging ideal in society. Likewise, it has always seemed strange to me how Physical Education (we call it P.E. in Australia) or Gym in high school movies is so often seen as the WORST. It was the favourite subject of most kids I went to school with, even the “nerdy” ones. In Australia having an outdoor lifestyle, eating fresh food with the seasons, etc. is seen as a part of our lifestyle. Don’t get me wrong, we still have problems with obesity, childhood obesity, etc. But in our media, at least, being fit, being healthy, doing exercise, and eating well are seen as positives. There were lots of bigger kids in my school that found a sport they could do well at. People eat unhealthily all the time but I have never seen a salad being demonised in media. Can someone explain this to me? Why has even an empowerment movie turned into yet another slam on eating well with healthy food having eyes rolled at it? Salad can be delicious. It can also be unhealthy actually. Can’t you eat a range of foods – this day a salad, that day a burger? I don’t know, it annoyed me because it’s a message I see all the time. Impossibly skinny chicks in movies and shows (I see you Gilmore Girls) constantly chowing down on greasy, sloppy foods and characters constantly demonising healthy foods like somehow that is “cool”? Colour me confused.

  7. Eric says:

    Success? 🙄

    • Rosalee says:

      $200-million dollars translates into a lot of success…damn I want to be Aniston successful, a beautiful house, beautiful friends, the ability to have choices that don’t hinge on worrying about the bills..I would say Aniston is extremely successful.

  8. Cantgoogleme says:

    Love Jen but whappened to

    “I did! I do! I will!!!!”

    I feel like that line about science and “maybe” in this article… she’s still doing the “will she or won’t she have kids” pandering routine that drives me nuts.

    *Huvane and she chuckle in meetings about how genius they are*

    • Jegede says:

      Because maybe it didn’t happen for her?

      IVF does not work for everyone.
      I know women who’ve been on the treatment for years to no avail.

      You take what life throws at you and move one.
      That’s what we all can do.

      • Carmen says:

        You’re assuming she had IVF and it didn’t take. I very much doubt that. I don’t think she ever wanted children, and I would have had a lot more respect for her if she had just come out and said so, told the media it was her business and no one else’s, and stopped the never-ending circus about her non-existent baby bumps. Because let’s face it, that and the massive pity party she threw after Pitt left her were the only things that were keeping her face on the tabloid covers for years after her first marriage broke up.

      • Jegede says:

        You’re assuming too.

        You persist with the narrative that because she doesn’t have them, means she never wanted them.

        I have respect for her for how she handled it.

        No matter what keeps being projected at her.

      • Tiffany :) says:

        Carmen, so you’d have a lot more respect for a person you don’t know if only they’d come out and parrot YOUR thoughts on children? That is some messed up logic right there.

        Judging people for not saying things that you are only guessing they feel is pretty extreme from my perspective.

      • Lithe says:

        @Carmen, can you not see how your attitude towards Jennifer’s reproductive intentions perpetuates the very thing you scorn? If people like you weren’t hounding her womb over the years, maybe she would’ve felt more comfortable being honest about her desires as they evolved. But then again, why should she have been? The only uterus you should be enraged over is your own.

      • Carmen says:

        @Lithe: I couldn’t care less about her womb. What got old fast was her nonstop bull crap about wanting children when she obviously didn’t. If she was unable to have them she could have adopted them. It’s fine not to want to have kids, but be upfront about it. She had to keep up the pretense of wanting them or risk alienating her fan base, who went into fits of delight whenever a tabloid ran yet another fake story about a baby bump.

      • STom says:

        “she could have adopted them”
        As someone who has adopted, i can confidently say that adoption is NOT for everyone – even for someone who wants children. It is predicated on loss on both sides and isn’t as easy as one may think.

      • cantgoogleme says:

        Sure, but she’s saying here it “ALWAYS seemed kind of frightening”

        News to me!

    • Enn says:

      When I was in my 20s and 30s I wanted children. Then I wanted one child. Life had other plans and at 40 that window has closed due to circumstances beyond my control, but I’m 100% okay with that and very much enjoy where I am and what I have.

      Put more succinctly – in 2005, I wanted kids. In 2018, I don’t. Could be the same for Jen.

    • lucy2 says:

      That was many years ago, and maybe that’s what she wanted at the time, or felt like she was supposed to want. That’s what she’s talking about here, the expectations that are put onto us, and finding out what we actually want for ourselves instead.
      Either way, people are allowed to change as life goes on.

  9. Snigs says:

    She looks fantastic in all the pictures and everything she is saying is totally on point!

    • Nev says:

      Word up.

    • Kitten says:

      Yeah I like when Aniston is Aniston. She does that *relaxed, California girl* look really well. I like these photos of her.

    • Trashaddict says:

      Thank god she’s not wearing the same old black dress. She looks great in the snakeskin dress, the colors really suit her. And I like her hair messy.
      But that weird sheet of chocolate has GOT to go-

  10. launicaangelina says:

    I love the black and white photo and really enjoyed Dumplin over the weekend.

  11. Babadook says:

    I can’t handle looking at those smooth armpits. Nobody’s armpits actually look like that…do they? DO THEY?!?

    • Nancy says:

      Lol. What is she supposed to do? Do you prefer hairy pits, haha? Kim Kardashian hates body hair so much, she lasers all the hair off of her body. I remember seeing, reading somewhere that Julia Roberts didn’t shave her underarm hair….now that’s something I couldn’t handle looking at!

    • Chaine says:

      Yes, they can with laser hair removal.

    • Other Renee says:

      That’s why we have photoshop.

  12. ValiantlyVarnished says:

    She’s right. As a 38 year old single woman I can attest to the fact that there is a lot of fear instilled in women about not having a partner or waiting too long to have children. And a lot of that comes from other women. And I agree about the divorce thing – a marriage that ends in divorce isn’t necessarily a failure. And we do need to change the way we look at divorce.

    • Sue Denim says:

      So this… I’m in my 50s and it took me a long time to realize that I’m happier, feel safer, saner, more financially secure, etc., on my own, the opposite of the tropes we’re given, but it’s taken a lot of strength and hard work to not let others define — or scare or ignore or one-down — me. A mountain to climb, but the view is lovely from here.

      • Kitten says:

        That’s so great. Wish more women would feel like this but it’s so difficult, given the messages that society sends us.

        I will tell you this re: financial security–that is no small thing. I watch my BF who is 32 struggle so much with money (he’s a paramedic AND in school getting his bachelor’s) and I feel very thankful that I can financially support myself AND hel him out from time-to-time.

    • Sue Denim says:

      So this… I’m in my 50s and it took me a long time to realize that I’m happier, feel safer, saner, more financially secure, etc., on my own, the opposite of the tropes we’re given, but it’s taken a lot of strength and hard work to not let others define — or scare or ignore or one-down — me. A mountain to climb, but the view is lovely from here.

      • NeoCleo says:

        Congratulations on your successful journey!

      • Sue Denim says:

        Thanks NeoCleo, it’s a work in progress and not right for everyone, and actually I wish for others that they find whatever or whoever their hearts desire… but hopefully it’s helpful to hear there are options…

  13. nerdas says:

    “ I would not stay in a situation out of fear. Fear of being alone. Fear of not being able to survive. To stay in a marriage based on fear feels like you’re doing your one life a disservice.“

    This! This ! I hate when people say is easy for you to say because you have millions and no kids. The way we just dehumanize these celebrities just because they are rich and famous.

    The end of a marriage is still very hard regardless. Leaving a marriage is one of the hardest things to do, and many women do stay in it because of fear of not being able to make it or being lonely. But in the end, she is absolutely right, that is a miserable life nobody should live, and you end up regretting it. We need more messages like this, to let women know, you will be alright, you have to fight the fear because the alternative is no life.

  14. anp says:

    She is so fake. There were many actresses who had more talent than she did but did not get the chances. Overrated.

  15. Wilma says:

    I don’t really mind that she was a part of driving the conversation about marriage and kids for a while. Most of us have been participants in patriarchic ideas about women whether we wanted to or not. I like her message now and think it’s the kind of message women need to hear more often.

  16. Sheryl says:

    I often wonder if Hillary Clinton and Beyonce stayed in their marriages for the fear of being alone or other fears. I just never understand why women stay in relationships where the partner has cheated. It is really an interesting discussion.

    • perplexed says:

      I think Hillary Clinton has always been in a more difficult position than other women because her husband was always in office of some kind (whether at the state level or presidential level).

      She also comes from a different generation. Had she been born in today’s generation, the “optics” might have allowed her to make a different decision.

      I don’t know what to say about Beyonce. But she’s probably like Victoria Beckham who is in a marriage that is part of a “brand”. I also think each person is different. What might be intolerable to one woman might be forgivable for another. I don’t think it’s possible to apply one size fits all for every woman. I assume they’d weigh both the good and the bad when making the final call. I find it interesting that Colin Firth continues to stay with his wife after she cheated as we’re often told that men find cheating more unforgivable than women do, but each person is built differently as to what they’re wiling to forgive (as I write this, maybe he’s secretly filing divorce papers – who knows).

    • Person3514 says:

      I think with Hillary it had to do with political optics and wanting to keep Bills connections to further her career. Politics is still very much a mans world and seemingly dated like it’s the 1950’s where a woman should stick by her man and present the wholesome family image. We’ve made some progressive progress in that regard, but baby steps and more recently, not when all that stuff happened. I also think her staying helped to gloss over Bills image, almost like whitewashing it over the years (not really with republicans, but that’s another can of worms). I think Hillarys decision to stick with Bill was very calculated on her part and it’s something I really admire about her. She has her issues, but I love the calculating and ruthless persona she has been given. She plays the political game just as good, if not better than most of her male counterparts and it’s something I will always respect about her. She really opened up the political spectrum for women, at least I think so. I’m only 30, so other than hearing about how other first wives supported their husbands, Hillary stands out to me as doing more politically than just being a first lady.

      Beyonce, I don’t understand. I think she elevates Jay and could still be the boss she is without him. I know he was famous on his own and everything, but I don’t think he would be anywhere near as popular as he is now without her.

    • Sheryl says:

      Interesting isn’t it because these women including Victoria have all the money etc. Do you think that perhaps women with more money and status divorce less than the average person after an affair? And what makes a success. For example, a marriage that breaks apart from an affair or a marriage that stays together. Which women seem more successful? I would say the women who stay in the marriage. With that said I know I never could every time I looked at my husband I’d be angry. How do you get past that? Perhaps those with less money have less to lose. A marriage that breaks apart in Hollywood is often seen as the women’s fault. They didn’t keep the man happy? So if Beyonce and Victoria and Hillary had left the marriage it would have been a failure but since they stayed it is a success I guess? Somehow though I think that HIllary and Bill’s marriage has not been a success. I think they have used each other but I just don’t see that they are really happy together could be totally wrong. Was Brad’s and Angie’s marriage a success? See I think so as they had children and many happy years together. However, Angie took a beating for the divorce. Women always do. Just musing.

      • perplexed says:

        I think Hillary feels she found her intellectual match in Bill Clinton. So, in a sense, I think they have a friendship based on intellectual companionship rather than sexual companionship. They also likely agree on most issues and are probably able to discuss policy together. Maybe she wouldn’t find that in another partner. A different man might be faithful to her, but may not match up to her in the way she wants intellectually. So I think that’s where women in her position weight positives and negatives and make a decision from there.

        Why Human Abedin stays with Anthony Weiner, I have no idea though. Bill Clinton can be charming and persuasive (if it can work on the public, why wouldn’t it work on a spouse? Even his daughter is quite forgiving of him and never seems to have issues with what he’s done, and maybe that also has an effect on Hillary). I assume he can charm his wife to some degree, at the very least as a doting father (I believe that can make a woman see a man differently, even with all his faults). How Anthony Weiner gets Abedin to stay with him is a mystery to me.

    • Yes Doubtful says:

      The Clinton’s stayed together because of politics. I think Hillary accepted long, long ago that he would not be faithful. As for Beyonce…she’s very old fashioned. I think she intends on this being her only marriage no matter what. Notice how she hasn’t let him out of her sight since this cheating came to a head? LOL

      • Famika says:

        I sill think Hillary loves Bill, despite what the press has always said and his cheating.
        Jackie Kennedy’s friend once said that Jack Kennedy was complicated but Jackie sill loved him. The friend said they felt like two halves of a whole, when you met them. Intellectual equals, even wit.

        I think Hillary and Bill are like some marriages , ups, downs , ups , downs and some people choose to stay and work through the difficulties. But we see their problems on the world stage

  17. Paisley says:

    She has complained about the will she or won’t she have children narrative put upon her; yet, she’s the one keeping it alive.

    • Wilder says:

      I have to agree with this. She’s powerful enough that if she wanted to, she could tell a magazine that certain topics (her marriages, whether or not she wants kids) are off the table.

  18. Yvette says:

    “She admits the prospect always felt “quite honestly, kind of frightening.” She continues, “Some people are just built to be wives and have babies. I don’t know how naturally that comes to me.”

    I hope people finally see/get her views on motherhood. And she’s right. Some women just aren’t meant to be mommies, and there is absolutely nothing wrong with that. Jennifer should be able to not want to be a mommy, to never be ready for children, to maybe one day decide to adopt a child or not.

    My damage with Jennifer is that I wish she had just been honest about her true views on motherhood 20 years ago. Now, before somebody replies with “She probably didn’t feel that way 20 years ago” please note that she says, these are her words, “She admits the prospect always felt “quite honestly, kind of frightening.” The key word in that statement is “always.”

    And my goodness, did she shade her fans for projecting their personal heartbreaks and disappointments on to her???

    • eto says:

      Yeah, I still don’t think that statement counts as premeditation lol. I don’t want children and have been told many, many times that it’s not unusual to feel scared or w/e about having kids but I’ll change my mind and/or regret it.

      I’m giving her the benefit of the doubt because I’m going through that shit and it will really have you thinking that you don’t know your own mind.

    • perplexed says:

      Wouldn’t your views evolve on this though? Sometimes you can think you might want to leave the option to have children open at 30 because society tells you you should and your body is still fertile enough to give you that option. I don’t necessarily think one’s views on having children are fixed even if you have a fear of parenting. George Clooney always seemed like the type who never wanted to have kids, and then out of the blue in his 50s he’s having twins. As a man, he had the option to wait because he could opt for a younger spouse who could carry his children, but he nonetheless evolved in how he viewed the idea of having a family. He seemed certain he didn’t want any and then….things changed. So I guess I don’t see why a woman’s view shouldn’t be allowed to evolve either. Your body is fixed, but other options can evolve in your mind..

      If someone has a planned child at 30, then I assume they always knew they wanted to have kids and made it happen (but planned children seem to be more of a rarity). For the people who have unplanned kids, I assume they just let parenthood happen to them.. And for the rest, I think it’s more up in the air and time and biology more or less decides for you whether children come into your life or not (if you’re careful with birth control, which I get the impression some people aren’t. Most pregnancies are unplanned).

      Also, I think you can find the prospect of motherhood frightening, but still want to potentially keep the option open if your body allows you to. I don’t think the two have to be mutually exclusive.

      • Yvette says:

        Yes, absolutely views can change as we grow and I don’t think I implied that wasn’t true, if so, I didn’t mean to imply such a thing. But this is about Jennifer and what she just said about how she feels and what she may or may not what. I truly do believe she is right in saying that some people have just projected their wishes, wants, needs on to her. The woman just plainly said that she is not a ‘Mommy’ woman, that she has always found the idea of being a Mommy somewhat frightening, and that it might or might not happen for her. She seems to enjoy her life without children. Some women just aren’t right for or want motherhood, and that’s perfectly okay.

        Jennifer is nearly 50 years old. When will people finally accept the fact that this is who Jennifer Aniston is and has always been? She has success, she is financially independent, she has plenty of close friends who love her, and she is content. It must feel liberating for her to finally put it out there. I am very happy for her.

      • perplexed says:

        I was referring to her views evolving from 20 years ago. She may have had the same fear of motherhood then, but because her body still had the option of fertility left, she may not have felt comfortable publicly shutting the door closed on the idea of having children. It’s probably only when one’s fertility is in total decline (i.e 50) that one may truly feel comfortable saying out loud that she doesn’t want to have children. But when the option is still there biologically, I can still see why one may not make a full public commitment to saying no to children. I think it’s harder to say with full certainty to the public that one doesn’t want children at age thirty than it is at 50. By the time you hit 50 (I’m assuming), you’re probably more likely to also feel more assertive to say what you want or what you don’t want. Yes, this is likely who she is (someone who doesn’t want children), but I think that sense of self is more likely to be cemented at 50 than at 30 (when you’re still sort of in flux). Thirty is an adult, but I co think it’s odd to expect a 30 year old to haver the same sense of certitude as a 50 year old. That’s more what I meant.

      • Yvette says:

        Okay, got it. But the fact that she didn’t own it back then is why her uterus has been under the microscope as well. So I guess one could say that she has suffered a reverse backlash to the one she probably feared if she’d come out with it years ago. Either way, she seems content with it now and I’m happy for her. 🙂

  19. cee says:

    JMO Aniston is the biggest phony in Hollywood. She and Justin were never married. Her PR guru is good at fixing her up with narratives to make her seem soooooooo happy. And of course if Angie was happy she had to be happy. But as soon as word on the street was Brad and Angie were done she didn’t need Justin anymore. Now as usual she brings up the baby thing so get ready for more poor Jen wants a baby headlines.

  20. Eleonor says:

    I can’t believe they are still asking her questions about having children.
    Seriously.

    • Yvette says:

      Jennifer controls her PR. They’re talking about what she wants to talk about in this interview. This is nothing new. She trots out the exes and the narrative of her childless state whenever she has a film to promote. Always.

    • Kitten says:

      I can’t believe it either. I would tear my hair out if I had to still talk about that shit at almost-50.

  21. Andrea says:

    As someone who is 37 unmarried with no children, I identify with this greatly. I have had many girl friends saying I should go back to my ex because they act like he is the last one who will ever have me. I have several girl friends who stay in unhappy marriages for the children or who settled to have kids. I know I do not want either but this seems to bother my friends because it makes them question their own choices which they do not want to do. Herd mentality. I wish we as women were more uplifting and supportive, but there seems to be such competition amongst us.

    • Famika says:

      I sometimes wonder if it’s misery loves company. I have friends who are miserable in their marriages, but push other single friends on why are they still single!

      • Kitten says:

        This. Don’t listen to them, Andrea!

      • tenniswho says:

        I think you are totally right! “Misery loves company” in my opinion is an underestimated underlying motivation for many advices. Even or especially those of friends (which I think doesn’t mean they are not real friends or anything – it seems to me only natural in an individualized society that stands for “you can reach everything”/ “you have to be happy, because you made your choices”.)

  22. Other Renee says:

    It’s totally her business if she wants to answer or deflect the “will she have kids” question. I doubt she wants them but you never know. Diane Keaton adopted kids when she was 50 and 55.

    There is something off with the mascara that is very visible in the close-up shots. It’s cakey.

  23. BJ says:

    I think she is still lying about her relationship with Justin.If they were legally married I’m pretty sure we would have heard about a divorce attorney handling the divorce.Even in the most amicable divorces they hire an attorney.There are stories about the divorce being finalized.

  24. sage says:

    Her face though. It doesn’t look…good to put it politely. Must be why the photographer used only photos with her hair covering her face. She still has a great figure!

    • Trashaddict says:

      Actually I thought her face looked OK, and I’m not really a major fan.
      If she really wanted to prove she didn’t care about being a baby factory, she would change the narrative and talk about something else for once.
      She’s pretty and reasonably talented but it seems a pity to have all those resources and be so boring.

  25. Goldie says:

    Well at least her last divorce was more successful than the marriage. She finally got Justin to join her in LA for her Christmas Party.

  26. Mash says:

    i think regarding the marriage this thats a load of bull….. she didnt really feel that way because she got into a FAKE marriage around the time of the whole brangelina marriage thing…. like why fake it, did he not agree to the prenup did that not even discuss that…. or was it that at that point she not want to be tied or financially potential tied in the way that marriage can be??? like what??

    also I’ve been in a 4 year relationship and then a 3 year relationship in my 20s (Im 30 now) at a time when (FKBOYS and player girls and getting left on read and people being in misunderstood situationships are the norm for millennial genners) and I dont think those relationships they were successful, as they both ended and for a time we were unhappy and couldnt get on the same page to progress to more years. AND THATS OK to admit it wasnt a successful relationship or union due to it ending, its not like im dishing out blame or whatnot. What is it about this special snowflake mentality that people want kudos for everything. Life is a series of wins and losses, success and unsuccesses. Our relationships can fail doesnt mean anyone won or lose it just is.

    I wish her interview was just like i dont know what life will entail but I’m trying to be as happy as I can be. I wish past partners the best, truly and I’m currently reevaluating what motivates and inspires me. But that would prob make huvane mad and not sell as many mags and also make this the shortest interview EVER LMAO