Samantha Markle was designated a ‘fixated person’ & a ‘risk’ by Scotland Yard

Samantha Markle & guests Ray Darcy

I didn’t pay any attention to the Samantha Grant (Markle) headlines all over the place around Christmas. Dealing with all of the drama and smears from the royal family, royal courtiers and her own father is bad enough for the Duchess of Sussex, and I hope she truly DGAF about Samantha. Samantha is a deranged famewhore. She’s like a MAGA Deplorable on Twitter who gets muted and just continues to scream and wail about everything. Well, Samantha was still trying to get headlines over the holidays, sending out faux Christmas messages to Meghan and ordering Meghan to speak to Thomas or whatever. But now it seems that Meghan’s security is taking Samantha seriously. Or should I say, they’re taking the threat Samantha poses seriously.

The Duchess of Sussex’s half-sister Samantha Markle has reportedly been placed on a ‘fixated persons’ list over the risks she poses of embarrassing the Royal family. Samantha, 53, who lives in Florida, has made a string of public snipes at Meghan since she was not invited to the Royal Wedding earlier this year. The Duchess’s protection officers are understood to have briefed Scotland Yard detectives over the the damage Samantha could cause to the Royal family’s reputation.

Earlier this month, Samantha sent a Christmas card to Meghan telling her the ‘time was now’ to ‘end the rift’ with her estranged father Thomas. In a picture of the card published by the Sunday Mirror, Samantha wrote: ‘Dad has been trying to contact you and is very hurt because you are avoiding him.’

Scotland Yard’s Fixated Threat Assessment Centre (FTAC) is a police unit which works with the NHS to identify risks posed by ‘lone individuals’ who stalk or harass public figures. On FTAC’s website, it states that it ‘helps such people get the care they need and, by doing so, decreases any risk they might pose, not just to prominent people, but to the individuals’ families and to those around them.’

A Scotland Yard source told The Sunday Times: ‘Someone like Samantha presents a risk rather than a threat. She is not committing criminal offences, but she is causing concerns for the royal family. There is big potential for some major embarrassment for the royals. Samantha could make a scene and create headlines with her actions — and let’s face it she’s kind of already done that.’

A source told The Sunday Times that FTAC would have been informed by the Duchess about Samantha’s ‘pattern of unwanted and persistent behaviour’. Taking to Twitter, Samantha responded: ‘This is ridiculous as I’m in an electric wheelchair and I live on a different continent LOL and advocating for doing the right thing by our dad is hardly fixation’.

[From The Daily Mail]

I think “fixated person” and “risk” are good descriptors for Samantha. She’s not actually threatening Meghan with physical harm, as far as I know, but she’s clearly mentally unwell, and she’s clearly fixated and damaged, and intent on saying anything about Meghan. Samantha is publicly harassing Meghan – Meghan has ignored her more than two solid years, and Samantha has just continued to wage her abusive campaign, with a lot of help from the British media. So… what happens now? Probably not much. Scotland Yard has just designated her a stalker/harasser, so if Samantha ever tries to come into the UK again, I bet detectives will do something. But other than that…?

Samantha Markle & guests Ray Darcy

Photos courtesy of WENN.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

139 Responses to “Samantha Markle was designated a ‘fixated person’ & a ‘risk’ by Scotland Yard”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Rojas says:

    Now put a restraining order and cease and desist on her.

  2. Heather says:

    The British are so proper! I love their use of language. Where I come from a “Fixated Person” is called a stalker. Fixated person sounds so much more elegant.

    She is clearly having some difficulties in her life and is trying to smooth them over with her, yes, fixation on her half sister. Asking once for her to pay attention to their father is fine. Maybe twice. But nearly daily for two years is harassment. It’s just as legally troublesome here in America as it is in the UK. The people advising her (and we could do a whole post on that!) seem to be ill equipped to do their job properly.

    • LahdidahBaby says:

      Lol re the Brit term “fixated person”, Heather—so true!

      Where I disagree with you is that to have ever PUBLICLY called Meghan out—even once, let alone multiple times—for alleged inattentiveness to their father was just wrong in so many ways. If Samantha had gone about this differently from the start, keeping her messages private and low key before she was rightfully blocked—even if she is wrong about it all—everything would be far different for her and for Meghan now…but she’s using their father to publicly shame and harrass Meghan, and I believe she is doing it with one singleminded motive: to put herself in the public eye, earn her thirty pieces ol silver, and out of a singular kind of envy, to tarnish her half-sister’s bright, shining moment.

      And all she has gotten for it beyond the money is the shame of being rightfully branded a fixated person.

      • Heather says:

        Well asking once would have been in poor taste if done in a public manner but the over and over demands and bullying is the unacceptable part. She will reap what she sows which is an empty barrel of notoriety with no pay off. I think it all comes down to daddy issues and sibling jealousy myself.

    • Roux says:

      You’re right. I said way back that Thomas & Samantha Markle were clearly mentally unwell and that although their actions were wrong, there is a reason other than that they’re bad people. However people jumped all over that because vilifying them seems more fun I guess.

      I think there has probably been tension between Meghan, Thomas & Samantha for sometime. Just because you may or may not know someone is mentally unwell, doesn’t make them easier to deal with. Especially when they’re your own family. I suspect that as Meghan’s star rose and particularly after she became engaged to Harry, she probably did have a period of acting rather full of herself as most people would and it’s most likely pushed the other two over the edge. They need to forget about her and move on for their own wellbeing because Meghan has already started down that route.

      • Melissa Soverall says:

        They had not talked to each other in 10yrs+ prior to the engagement. Samantha called Meghan’s mother “the maid”. Samantha’s own Mom and kids don’t talk to her. How did you jump to Meghan being full of herself and helping the estrangement to blossom? Sis did all of that on her own, but thanks for the “boarding house” reach and trying to shift some of the responsibility for Samantha’s atrocious,crazy behavior onto Meghan.

      • CairinaCat says:

        Mental illness doesn’t make people raging huge assholes
        it is absolutely NOT an excuse to act so hateful. People with mental illness can still make choices.
        It can make the behavior extra special, and you are more likely to make impulsive choices and think better of it later.. but thats the key point you think better of it later and normal people with mental illness try to do better and take measures to curb their future behaviors.

        My whole family (especially me)is Majorly bipolar, OCD, ADD, Depressive, Anxiety disorders, the whole Affect family cocktail. And only one of us is a huge self indulgent bitch.

        Unless your committed somewhere or so crazy your literally out of your mind and homeless.. NO ONE is crazy 24/7
        Everyone can make choices, even if that choice is to go into the hospital because you need that level of help.

        It really pisses me off that shit behavior gets excused because of mental illness.
        Unless your so crazy you don’t know who you are, you can CHOOSE to at least TRY to make good choices.

      • Helen Smith says:

        I find Samantha bullying but she’s also said a lot that has been exhoed by discrded friends of Meghan who don’t have contact with Samantha. So my takeaway is you can be a crazy, bullying truth teller.

        As for the crazy being an a-hole is part of the deal with malignant BPD, NPD and untreated or poorly treated Bipolar. I have all three in my family tree a d those relatives refusw to get help because they don’t think it will help, think they can handle things on their own, or live in denial.

      • Olenna says:

        Ha! Who are these discarded friends (plural!)? Priddy? LOL! Unless you are Scamantha or one of these pathetic acquaintances, none of us Know who is talking or corresponding to who.

      • Roux says:

        I didn’t realise that they’d gone so long without talking but I stand by my point. I work in the mental health field and I know that the bad behaviour sticks. It’s what everyone remembers and holds on to. I agree that people with mental illnesses do have moments of clarity, feel remorse and try to make positive changes but this is playing out in front of the media who will only report the bad and the ugly. Most likely we will never hear about the moments of reflection and regret. The blame isn’t on Meghan. It’s like leaving a bad relationship for example and then the person you left has a break down. You leaving may have triggered the break down but you did the best thing you felt you could. It’s all very easy to judge from a distance and point fingers but nobody is perfect.

    • Thirsty Hirsty says:

      @Heather you think people are advising her??? Yes, let’s do a whole post on that?!!! Because I think she’s just doing this herself to herself and publicizing that she’s on ANY kind of list gives her more fodder (oooo, maybe you’re right…)

      • Heather says:

        People are claiming to advise her. Either their advice is bad or she’s not listening. Either is likely. Either way it was a whole lot of stupid PR moves that led her to this point. I’m not in PR but I can think of a million ways off the top of my head where if she’d taken a left instead of a right she would be in a better position and have more public sympathy to try and leverage however she wanted. That’s a wasted opportunity now. And still no attention ($) from her sister.

      • Olenna says:

        Ironically, Scamantha has/had a PR rep who, claiming to be a Christian, has been verbally abusive to MM fans on Twitter.

  3. Aephra says:

    Maybe the designation will make newspapers and television think twice about interviewing her.

    • Lanne says:

      That’s the best part! Any interview with her could be prefaced with Markle, on the Scotland Yard fixated person list, claims….which completely invalidates her as a source. Good move, palace! Finally we’re seeing some proper action!

      • Elise says:

        I love it. I can see a whole Fixated Person industry in the US. Imagine how many names would be on it for certain, er, political figures.

    • L84Tea says:

      Ooooh yes, very good point.

    • Jan90067 says:

      Aephra, I think you just hit the nail on the head!!! If, now, with this legal connotation, if papers continue to let her “fixate” on harassing Meghan (and TRF by extension), they could be considered to be aiding and abetting legally, by Scotland Yard!! Verrrrrrry clever move! Makes me wonder if marking Evil Papa Smurf with the same designation is next!

      On another note, I want to wish all my fellow CBers a VERY Happy New Year, one with health, happiness, prosperity, and a LOT of Congressional hearings and indictments! Here’s to 2019!!! 🥂🌊🎉❤️

    • Monicack says:

      I can’t wait for the IRS audit!!

    • Princessk says:

      But insanely jealous Scammy has achieved what she wants. She doesn’t want to be friends with her half sibling, Scammy wants to be famous and on the world stage like Meghan. Don’t forget that Scammy is a failed model/actress who has unfulfilled dreams. But all that Scammy has achieved is infamy and notoriety, but l think that she is happy to settle with belonging in the rogues gallery.

      Both Scammy and the father have ‘issues’ which Meghan was aware of but she probably never expected her relatives to go this crazy. They actually need therapy to help with their various issues. If they continue with their nonsense they will definitely end up in trouble. Scammy’s handwriting on the Xmas card she sent to Meghan is clear evidence that she has the signs of somebody on the spiral to a complete nervous breakdown.

      • HappyFeetGladFeet says:

        ” Scammy’s handwriting on the Xmas card she sent to Meghan is clear evidence that she has the signs of somebody on the spiral to a complete nervous breakdown.”
        Or it could be her Multiple Sclerosis, which she is in a wheel chair due to the effects of, causing problems with handwriting. It usually effects the handwriting of patients with it. I think Samantha is an unhinged narcissist however lets not go overboard analysing every little thing. Don’t forget that she does have a condition that affects mobility and motor skills.

  4. Hikaru says:

    “A Scotland Yard source told The Sunday Times: ‘Someone like Samantha presents a risk rather than a threat. She is not committing criminal offences, but she is causing concerns for the royal family. There is big potential for some major embarrassment for the royals. Samantha could make a scene and create headlines with her actions — and let’s face it she’s kind of already done that.’”

    So let me clarify something – “She is not committing criminal offences, but she is causing concerns for the royal family”…. because “There is big potential for some major embarrassment for the royals.”

    Are the police really allowed to treat a public figure feeling embarrassed as equal in terms of legal ramifications as an actual crime while also admitting that there is no criminal activity happening? What?

    The sh*t you can get away with when you’re rich and privileged is astounding. Actual assault victims are ignored by the police on the regular because of the lack of funding but here we are treating hurt feelings as a national emergency.

    • Millennial says:

      I don’t like that they framed it as an embarrassment thing. It’s not about hurt feelings and embarassment. It’s that Samantha is a stalker and is emotionally and verbally abusing Meghan and has been aided and abetted by the British tabloids. That should be taken seriously as it’s very mentally taxing and abusive.

      • BlueSky says:

        She’s definitely an stalker. Anyone who would fly to England just for the sole purpose of harassing someone who has made it clear wants nothing to do with you is clearly troubled. What’s sickening is that she tends to weaponize her illness when anyone dares to criticize her.

    • Lanne says:

      But horrible sis has said and done things that a person could legit claim harassment over. She’s a legit lone wolf threat, mainly because she could inspire or even egg on a crazy who would take action. She has multiple Twitter acts where she openly engages with people who threaten Meghan. Everyone should have stalking claims taken seriously.

    • minx says:

      I think her behavior crossed the line from embarrassing to stalking/harassment long ago.

      • Montrealaise says:

        She is definitely a stalker – when someone has made it very clear they want nothing to do with you but you persist in trying to contact that person, that’s stalking. Samantha obviously has serious mental health issues; she is even estranged from her own mother and her own children (I read that one of her daughters had to get a restraining order against her). So why are the tabloids and TV shows continuing to give a public platform to someone who is clearly mentally ill?

      • LahdidahBaby says:

        Yes, a LOOOOONG time ago!

    • MargaritasForBreakfast says:

      I believe the antics of Thomas Markle and Samantha Markle/Grant/Whatever are contributing to a heightened security threat around Meghan, Harry and potentially Polo B. Sussex. Unhinged nutjobs need only take their cues from evil papa smurf or bully Samantha and decide that Meghan doesn’t deserve to be a member of the royal family. A deranged person might become convinced that they are doing “miserable Harry” a favor by killing Meghan. If Scotland Yard were diligent they would put Piers Morgan and Evil Papa Smurf on the list too. I was horrified by the number of people saying mean things about Meghan on YouTube. One example is a tarot card reader named Yvonne who can only manage to find mean nasty things to say about Meghan in her “readings”. Her followers call Meghan narcissistic, gold digger, social climber, “actress”, half-breed, not worthy of harry, too controlling, a slut, a yacht prostitute, a D list actress, and jealous of Kate. A white supremacist group has already threatened Harry and Meghan. This is a serious issue. Meghan and Harry’s safety is at stake, not just hurt feelings.

      • jan90067 says:

        Harry has already been targeted by white supremacists there for being a “race traitor”. I believe the police there arrested 2 or 3 people involved in a plot. It is truly INSANE! If Crazy Samantha does egg the demented loons following her to act…omg! I’m thinking about when H&M come on tour here (and they’re saying they will bring Polo Baby). I have to wonder if MI6 will assign “someone” to “keep an eye” on Crazy Sam for the duration of the trip. Esp. if she makes a move to try and be wherever H&M are scheduled to show up. Might not be a bad idea.

      • LahdidahBaby says:

        Well said, MargaritasforBreakfast–this isn’t just an annoyance, it’s a serious, possibly life-and-death matter.

    • Lady Keller says:

      It’s about more than embarrassment and hurt feelings. She is libeling her half sister which is a legal matter. She is clearly harassing another person beyond just embarrassment. While samantha may not pose a physical threat she is stirring up trouble on Twitter and potentially inciting violence or abuse against her half sister. I fully support Scotland yard being involved.

      Meghan may be getting preferential treatment because she is a member of the royal family, but let’s not kid ourselves, as a public figure she is very much at risk and security threats need to be taken seriously.

    • DS9 says:

      So basically you don’t understand or care to understand what stalking is….

      Because persistent unwanted contact that would otherwise be legal is what this is and what stalking is and quite often leads to criminal behavior.

      • Olenna says:

        The OP doesn’t like MM, so rational or reasoned responses aren’t going to change her narrative. It’s like this with several commenters–they’ve got a bead on Meghan and will continue to aim for a headshot whenever they can.

    • Dizzy says:

      The BRF are more than just public figures, they are really part of the nation and are important symbols and figure heads. That’s why Scotland Yard has to address this. They actually explain this concept really well on “the Crown”.

  5. Bellagio says:

    And also designated as crazy by everyone else.

  6. intheknow says:

    I wonder if crazy people know hey are crazy? Scammy is clearly batshit crazy. She has no intention of stopping because she wants the life Meaghan has. I think this is a ‘warning shot’ to Scammy as in ‘we see your crazy’. I expect something to happen if she continues I am just not sure what. Also, putting her on this list makes sense since Harry and Meghan are supposed to be travelling to the U.S in 2019. I suspect they are laying the ground work to keep Scammy away and I would not be surprised if she is detained somehow when Harry and Meghan are in the U.S.

    • Bettyrose says:

      Samantha thus far has been well rewarded for her behavior, and so it continues. That’s not necessarily crazy (albeit mean and lacking in self awareness). As someone pointed out above, though, this may be the first step in reducing her value to the tabloids, now that they’ll need to qualify her as a stalker.

      • Lanne says:

        That’s the truly disgusting part, the way the tabloids have been aiding and abetting an abuser. This whole episode shows that not a thing has been learned since Diana.

      • MargaritasForBreakfast says:

        Piers Morgan sickens me. I wish Meghan had never gotten entangled with him. He is such a damaged male ego.

    • Monicack says:

      You mean mentally ill? Ugh with the crazy talk. Samantha Markle is not nor is anyone else struggling with psychological hygiene issues crazy. Samantha is mentally ill. And a spiteful bitch.

  7. Miss M says:

    They are finally doing something about that.

    • Peg says:

      They have been monitoring the Markles for a while, Samantha showing up at Kensington Gardens which is close to Kensington Palace, was different than vile posting on Twitter, she was entering stalking terrority.

  8. Peg says:

    Wanna bet daddy dearest is on this list also, they don’t usually announce who is on this list, but some how Scotland Yard leaked Samantha’s name.
    She is such a coward, was going crazy on Twitter, threatening to sue an Australian paper/Tv saying they were lying, then she realize it was actually true. Now she is claiming she is advocating for her father, the dying father that is on Tv, attacking Meghan and the Royal Family.
    Every letter or tweet she posted about Meghan and Harry, Royal Protection will have a record of, and this is probally what they handed over to Scotland Yard,
    It’s not who shouts the loudest as samantha will find.
    Samantha is spiraling out of control, she don’t understand that it’s Meghan’s choice not to have any dialogue with the Markles.

  9. Piper says:

    I saw someone say this may make her worse bc now she’s like a dogs teeth clamped. But I guess for now it’s all anyone can do.

    • minx says:

      If it makes her worse that proves that SY was correct. A normal person would take this seriously and shut it down.

    • Digital Unicorn says:

      Her brother once said that if she doesn’t get what she wants from you she will make your life hell until she gets it.

      • jan90067 says:

        Didn’t he say that he got a bedroom that she wanted when they were growing up, so in “revenge”, she STABBED his waterbed to ruin it. She has ALWAYS been deranged!

  10. minx says:

    I just love this.

  11. NotSoSocialButterfly says:

    She’s not sane. I have never seen such a strong resemblance between half sisters as in this photo of the nutter.

  12. Mew says:

    She’s yet to publish her tell-all book which she probably hopes will hit hardest when the baby is born. She’s not going anywhere.

    • Sassy says:

      She’s been saying she’s going put out that tell all since the engagement. I believe it when I see it. No reputable publishing house want to deal with a defamation lawsuit for a book that won’t make them much money if any at all.

      • DML says:

        Unfortunately you don’t need a publishing house to put out a book these days. Anyone can publish anything on their own. She will put something out and will probably be self published for an e-reader or some such Sh*! I’m sure.

      • Sassy says:

        Oh she wants a publishing house to back her book she wants money. Otherwise that book would be out already.

      • Heather says:

        The one publishing house she named has since confirmed they read a chapter or two of this “book” and passed. LOL

    • Digital Unicorn says:

      What would she put in it? Her relationship with Meghan has pretty much always been non existent.

      • Nanny to the rescue says:

        Misconstructing every contact ever?

        She’s gonna tell her side of the story – fabricated or even true through her eyes, as strained relationships usually have the truth somewhere in the middle.

        And don’t forget even the most innocent arguments can be described in a way that they read much worse between the lines (and then, when the other side freaks out, they say it’s their imagination or projection). You need a competent writer for that sort of thing, tho.

      • Anna says:

        The sad thing is, the book will be publishing extract all over the DM and The Sun. More ammo for smearing Meghan.

  13. Lisa says:

    Richly deserved. This nonsense has been going on two years and needed to be done.

  14. Snowflake says:

    She’s on disability from what I’ve read. So she probably gets food stamps as well due to her low income. I wonder if she is still getting government assistance? I’m sure she has made a lot of income off of her interviews. I bet she hasn’t reported it. Unbelievable that she changed her last name from Grant to Markle to help her cash in on Meghan by association. I read that she lives/lived in Ocala, FL. I’ve never been there, but go through that area via Interstate 10. I think of her as being like Cinderella’s step sisters, a nasty person who is mad her step sister has it better than her.

  15. Reggie says:

    It’s a shame it took them this long to act on it

  16. Magdalin says:

    This is great. About time. This is setting the groundwork for several things, in my opinion.
    1. She won’t have as much value to tabloid press, and no one, not even Thomas, will come to her defense, publicly.
    2. Warning shot to Thomas, who yes, is probably also on the list or near going on. Texting someone every day is harassment.
    3. Remember her alias Twitter accounts where as someone mentioned above, she is said to interact with some truly troubled people regarding Meghan, so I think she’s shocked that there have been consequences and that she’s been found out.
    4. She is probably going to end up on a no-fly list and
    5. Definitely won’t be able to get near them when they come to North America.
    6. May effect the ability to sell her book in the UK and now many won’t want to pay as much attention to it because it’s written by a bona fide stalker.
    7. Warning to British press that this is not a game and the shenanigans have to stop.

    I also hope that disability rights/advocacy groups come down on her hard for pulling the “I”m in a wheelchair” card. Double-edged sword, but it doesn’t mean you can’t stalk someone and it doesn’t mean that you are always less-than-capable of doing something, good or bad.

  17. Peg says:

    This is Piers Morgan Tweet begging Clarence House for a wedding invite.
    Piers Morgan
    Congrats Meghan & Harry
    My friend will make the perfect modern bride
    ps Do I get an invite @meghanmarkle

    Just like Samantha when Piers did not get an invite he went ballistic.

    • Olenna says:

      Morgan’s recent New Year prediction tweet targeting HM’s baby was just disgusting and proves he is nothing but a scum-of-the earth, prejudiced POS. He should be put on the list as well.

      • MargaritasForBreakfast says:

        I totally agree! It’s from him that others initially received the signal that it’s ok to continuously bash a member of the royal family. He is disingenuous in pretending to be hurt by being “ghosted”. He is a media personality who has had hundreds of celebrity guests on his show to talk about their movie project, their new album, their new tv show, their new play, etc. There is no reason to expect friendship from any of them. It’s quid pro quo. They appear on his show and make him seem well connected. He gives them publicity for their project. Why is he not whining and bitching about not being friends with the Beckhams? Kiera Knightley? Naomi Campbell? Because they’re celebs, not friends! Meghan is not and never has been his friend. She was promoting her show. He knows this but chooses to be an asshole anyway.

  18. Digital Unicorn says:

    If true then she’ll be watched – her online presence etc.. will be monitored. I don’t know why people listen to her, she is a bigger liar than her father. I still chuckle at the pap shots of her at ‘Kensington Palace’ gates giving her ‘letter’ to the police to give to Meghan. LOL – the reality was that it was at a police box at the street next door and those police were from the diplomatic service as there are several embassies (Israel and Russia) along that street which is called Kensington Palace Gardens. This is a woman who was caught out with multiple twitter accounts where she was liking her own posts and replying to them to make out she had ‘fans’ – a smart Twitter user outed her. Its scary to think that she’s been in contact with other unhinged people who want to harm Meghan – you can bet she wouldn’t care if her sister was hurt by one of these people.

    She is the poster child for what jealousy does to a person and I know her own mother and brother have said she has always been like this. Attention is attention for these types of nut jobs – they don’t care where it comes from as long as they get it.

    • jan90067 says:

      Guess she inherited the malignant narcissist gene from daddy dearest.

    • Lady D says:

      This is a narcissist in all their glory? What’s next, actual violence? I remember when Kelly Rutherford was kidnapping her children, the conversations on narcissism mentioned that approximately 25% of them become very depressed when thwarted in their aims. What do the other 75% do when they lose? More of the same words and actions from them? Do they quit and disappear with their tail between their legs, or does losing amp up the rage?

      • Digital Unicorn says:

        Having worked with narcissists, it amps up the rage and while many will not act on it others will – while she won’t be violent toward Meghan (not that she can) she can and will entice others to. This is another trick by narcissists, they get others to do their dirty work for them.

  19. Sassy says:

    She’s a stalker she’s publicly harassed this woman she hasn’t seen or spoken to in a decade and she even showed up to KP with her jailbird boyfriend to deliver a letter. Who in their right mind does that? If she wasn’t a blood relative she would’ve been classified as a stalker a long time ago.

    Wish she would put the same effort into reconnecting with her own kids and elderly mother as she is stalking Meghan.

    • BlueSky says:

      This. I wish someone would question her about her own relationship (or lack of) with her own kids.

      She got called out for not visiting her father for Christmas and said she couldn’t because she’s in a wheelchair but you can travel to Europe to stalk your half sister whom you have a nonexistent relationship with.

      I guarantee she and her father aren’t as close as she wants people to think they are. He’s probably scared of her too.

      • Catrìona says:

        BlueSky is right. Samantha is pedalling rubbish. I’m in a wheelchair, and I travel all over the world. (At the moment I’m in France.) People in wheelchairs travel all the time.

  20. Tw says:

    How long has she been in a wheelchair? I ask because she’s made a few statements about it. Reminds me of Thomas Markel’s heart attack. I could be wrong so please don’t jump down my throat if I am. This family seems a little Munchausen’y to me.

    • Digital Unicorn says:

      For a long time IIRC, not sure why thou – I think she’s claimed it was MS and then a car accident .
      Like Evil Papa Smurf and his heart attack which keeps changing every time he talks about it – now he had 3 and one of them was called ‘the mother of heart attacks’ but that didn’t stop him from driving about a few days later after alleged attacks being seen eating McDonalds. Its gone from stents (which he said at the time was going to get done anyway) to full on multiple heart attacks with dodgy receipts in a sad attempt to prove it.

      No one believes whatever either of them say.

      • Peg says:

        The picture she always posting with Meghan is from 2008 in a wheel chair.
        In her old twitter posts she claims it is not MS.
        She is suppose to be in New Mexico courtroom on January 14, sued a property owner for a fall, that she claimed put her in a wheelchair.
        She is making so much money off Meghan’s back, she may skip the trail, but when her current source of money dries up, she may go back to being litigious.
        This woman is well-versed in lawsuits, skipping States to avoid appearing.

    • Catrìona says:

      –There is a photo of Samantha / Yvonne Marie Grant / Markle that was taken in her house. That photo proves that she does not use a wheelchair when she is in her house. It was the first thing that I noticed when I first saw the photo because I use a wheelchair. In this photo she is blonde and is wearing a white shirt. Part of the room is painted pale yellow. There is a bouquet of flowers over her right shoulder and a strange pagoda-shaped brown whatnot displaying odd things over her left shoulder. Behind her there is a hallway, and in that hallway there is a metal chair leg that sticks out into the passage. Now, my tiny, narrow all-terrain wheelchair could not get past those chair legs, so there is no way that her huge tank of a wheelchair could get past them.
      –Now some people require a wheelchair when outwith a building, but never use one when in a building. (I’m one of those people.) However, this very real limitation does not make a person fully disabled.
      –Upon seeing that photo I knew that Samantha is not as disabled as she pretends to be. To whatever extent Samantha is disabled, I suspect that she is milking her disability for all she can get.

      • GotDamn says:

        Not every disabled person requires a wheelchair all the time. She has MS, which gets worse over time. A feature of that disease is also that people get flare-ups. Finally, because it mostly affects women, MS was considered ‘fake’ for years. Until imgaing got better and they could actually see the lesions.

        You’re being a real asshole about people with disabilities, here.

      • Snowflake says:

        She strikes me as a real con artist. She may have a disability but I believe she exaggerates the extent of it

      • Olenna says:

        @GD, first of all, Catrìona is not criticizing all persons with disabilities. Secondly, someone up-thread stated Scamantha is suing someone for a fall that resulted in her “disability”. So what it is? Is she disabled due to a fall or MS? Is she really disabled? Maybe you could provide some receipts for Scamantha’s MS rather than blasting other commenters for their opinions about someone who is proving themselves to be a grifter and is publicy harassing her own sister.

      • Catrìona says:

        “You’re being a real asshole about people with disabilities, here.”
        –I’ve been disabled since I was ten. I know a phoney when I see one, and Samantha is the ultimate fraud.
        Remember that ‘Broken Ankle and Fractured Knee’ she claimed to have suffered from the crash that didn’t happen ? -LOL-
        “MS was considered ‘fake’ for years. Until imgaing got better and they could actually see the lesions.”
        –BTW, the French neurologist Jean-Martin Charcot (1825–1893) was the first person to recognise multiple sclerosis as a distinct disease in 1868, so the disease hasn’t been considered ‘fake’ for well over a century.

      • Montrealaise says:

        GotDamn – I’ve known people with disabilities. Some very nice people become disabled, and some very nasty people get disabled, as well. The nasty ones are not above using their disability to make people feel sorry for them, exaggerate the extent of their disability and use it to try to excuse their bad behaviour – and that is exactly what Samantha is doing here. Pointing this out doesn’t make anyone an “asshole”.

      • Christin says:

        @Montrelaise – Well said. Your observations mirror my own experience.

        There are people who will absolutely milk a medical issue for attention and/or a free pass. Others who suffer greatly say very little about their challenges. I think SM is likely the first category.

  21. Mego says:

    Embarassment is only one of many things the victim of a stalker suffers. I get the sense from this that the concern is about the Royal Family rather than Meghan.

  22. CatWomen says:

    That’s appropriate, her family would be better off stopping this media crazy and dealing with separation issues privately.

  23. Cora says:

    I just read that she has connections to white supremacist groups and that is maybe why she is being listed.

    • Heather says:

      I can see that. Even if she accuses anyone who disagrees with her of being white nationalists (even those of color, and they’re all defending a bi racial woman).

  24. DML says:

    I think this is how the Royal fam have decided to fight back. This to me is better than any public statement from Windsor on Kensington. I love it!

    • L84Tea says:

      I agree, especially because now this puts the media in a sticky position. If they continue to entertain her nonsense, they might find themselves in the same boat.

  25. Peg says:

    Thomas, Samantha, and Jr. have sense of entittlement, they thought they would been living on easy street.
    Samantha in an interview said they should send a private plane for Thomas to come visit after his fake heart attack.
    Yes i said fake HA, because the bills he produced were not from the hospital he claimed, there is a copy of their bill on their Website, he was 73 on Medicare, the Medicare portion of the bill would’ve deducated, before he was sent a bill.
    This man was bankrupt in 2016, owes between 47-67 thousand in back taxes.
    They thought if they embarrassed Meghan, she would cave and give in to their demands, did not happen, guess they did not know the Royal Family could rival the Dutch in penny pinching.
    Thomas is just crass.

    • Heather says:

      They over estimated her power. Even if she wanted to (which I doubt she does anyway), Meghan, Duchess of Sussex has no control over any of the purse strings besides her private money.

    • Catrìona says:

      I noticed that about the so-called hospital bills too. I also noticed that the pages had no header with the name of the hospital.

      • brutalethyl says:

        It sounds like he learned his scam from Brooks of RHOC fame. He faked doctor bills for his “cancer” and got busted. Vickie was, of course, shocked. lol

  26. aquarius64 says:

    Daddy and Jr have not publicly defended Sam, probably out of fear of exposure. I bet her boyfriend Mark is ready to dump her now. How many newscasters are defending the Markles now? Frankly I think the British media knew Sam was crossing the line and the tweets and interviews was providing rope to hang herself. She is bashing the media but not Meghan and the Royals, probably afraid if she does it again she’ll be arrested.

    • Lady D says:

      I think your charitable thoughts towards the media’s actions are quite kind. The media on the other hand isn’t. I think they’ll print anything that will make them money, and decency doesn’t stand a chance. They will just as gleefully tear down Sam as they will anyone, for the almighty dollar. Oh for the days of quality journalism.

  27. Lanne says:

    I hope the irs is taking interest in her tabloid earnings. She’s at risk of losing whatever disability she’s receiving if she openly earns outside money

  28. Lucia says:

    I have MS and I’m pretty sure Samantha does too despite the fact she’s a liar. All I have to say is that if my MS ever causes me to act the way Samantha acts, I want to be euthanized. But I don’t think it’s the MS, I bet she was unwell before she was diagnosed but her mental state is tearing her up and making it worse. The fact her kids don’t speak to her says volumes.

    • Heather says:

      Rest easy. I doubt her MS (if she has it) is the reason for her vile behavior. She most likely suffers from a personality disorder.

      • Lucia says:

        She reminds me of an aunt I have who was diagnosed as a narcissist. We took in her kids. I think she has MS and she’s making it worse. MS is one of those diseases where you have to remain mentally strong and resilient or it will cause the disease to progress further and tear your up. Her obsession with Meghan is truly destroying her.

      • Christin says:

        @Lucia, I have wondered how this constant battling could be good for anyone suffering a chronic illness. Stress is not good for anyone, especially those with MS, immune diseases, etc.

        Then again, some people seem to thrive on chaos and drama. I knew a lady diagnosed with aggressive cancer a few years ago. She was a friendly person, but she never seemed OK unless there was family/relationship drama brewing. She sought treatment at one of the best facilities in the country, and was told point-blank by doctors that she HAD to reduce stress. She told them she couldn’t do it. It was her “normal” or comfort zone, but clearly it was harming her health. She passed away in less than a year, in her 50s.

    • Catrìona says:

      Not to worry, Lucia. It’s not the MS. Samantha has some kind of personality disorder, like BPD or NPD.
      Bon réveillon !

  29. TheOriginalMia says:

    She is stalking her sister and I’m glad the RPS recognizes her behavior for what it is. If she continues to get paid by the tabloids, then they are abetting a crime. Sue them, DoS!

  30. OCE says:

    Finally we the public can see that something is being done to halt the deluge of negative press against the Duchess of Sussex. Let Scammy slither back into the gutter. She has already made her Twitter account private as of Sunday, 12/30. The Britiah press will certainly heed the warning in this leaked message, but time will tell how this continues to unfold.
    #ShotsFired #Enough #NoMoreAbuse #BlackGirlMagic #NeverComplainNeverExplain #LookingAtYouNextThomasMarkle

  31. Anon says:

    Here’s a thought. Meghan is still a U.S. citizen and though British law does not apply here, certainly U.S. law does – where we take stalking very seriously. She could file a TRO in Ocala and make it permanent, based on the seriously b@isht crazy coming out of SM’s corner. Sure, it’s not ideal, but that might just shut it down.

    Also, I don’t know how many of you have been on the UK news sites, but holy cow those British commenters are super racist. Just terrible. Meghan Markle is the Jackie Robinson of the British Royal Family.

    • Sara Martin says:

      It would qualify as international terrorism.

    • Tina says:

      Many of the commenters on the Daily Mail, for example, are not British and/or not real people. Do not take them for the opinions of the majority of British people.

  32. Rosie says:

    This is really good news. Agree that Piers Morgan needs to go on the list.

  33. Sara Martin says:

    Anyone who responds to being investigated by an Intelligence agency for possible stalking with a twitter comment of “LOL” really ought to go see a psychiatrist before they do some permanent damage to their lives. If anyone cares about this person, they will do something to get her help before she is charged with stalking. She obviously has no grip on reality or the possible criminal consequences of her words and actions, on which she has no bridle.

    • brutalethyl says:

      I think she’s burned all her bridges. I doubt anybody cares enough about her to do anything.

  34. minx says:

    I can’t stomach those pictures of her, preening for the camera. Ugh.

  35. Sage says:

    This chick is nut job!! Her behaviour is not normal or rational. Wtf!

  36. Other Renee says:

    I just do not understand why the Queen is unable to shut this down. Doesn’t she have any control of the media, especially when it comes to another potential Diana situation? I think this whole thing with Lunatic Samantha and Terrible Tom has gotten to a frightening level. Why should Piers Morgan be allowed to interview Tom when it’s clearly a danger to a member of the BRF? Why should any British tabloid or TV station be allowed to publish interviews with these lunatics? Surely the Queen has SOME influence here? It’s gone way beyond just unpleasant. I think it’s frighteningly dangerous.

  37. s says:

    It’s probably the most “Most Wanted” she’ll ever be.

    Those Markle genes are super strong. I read on a blog once that Samantha Markle looks like Meghan through a (very) crooked looking glass and they really do have a point. It’s like Meghan got the best version of the Markle face and her half-sister got the worst. It seems that Doria tempered those Markle genes somewhat.

    • Peg says:

      Meghan looks like Doria, there is a picture of the two of them, after her UN Speech, they look like sisters with a twenty-five age difference.
      Samantha lips are thin not Mehgan’s, may have her father’s nose according to her.
      Height and limbs from Doria and it seems like her personality is also from her mother otherwise she would be classless like her father, sister and brother.

    • Sassy says:

      She has Thomas nose but other than that and skin tone she’s all Doria.

  38. Booie says:

    Good. Add her father to that list. Hope meaghan and her real family have a great year ahead of them safe from these gold digging clowns

  39. Vanessa says:

    For too long Samantha and Thomas were able to get away with horrible stalking behavior towards Meghan because of their white privilege. How many people on this site say that if the Markles were black the media especially the British media would have called them names and never given them the time of day. But because of Samantha and Thomas whiteness they both were able to get away with harassing stalking vile behavior toward meghan they were rewarded with money for interviews pictures the more nasty they were toward meghan the more the British press pay them. Piers Morgan help Samantha and Thomas with their attacks on meghan by allowed them to constantly appear on his show because he has his issues with meghan I’m not buying that Samantha is too disabled to go to Mexico to see her dad for Christmas because the sun interview Samantha the day the news broke about meghan and harry having a baby Samantha was in Ireland with her wheelchair.I think that Samantha is so consume with bitterness and jealousy toward meghan that she can’t see straight she is obsessed with her. Everyone in Samantha family say the same things that Samantha has always been jealous of meghan since the day she was born that she hated meghan and doria and would always speaks badly to anyone who listen. Samantha younger daughter said that Samantha made it impossible for her to have a relationship with meghan. I do believe that Samantha is a danger to meghan in that she probably wouldn’t do anything to meghan herself but I do think that she tweets with people who would love nothing more than to do something to meghan and I think that Samantha encouraged some of the more dangerous people with her words and actions towards meghan. Hopefully with the news being leaked that Samantha is on notice that would make her calm a little but I think she would see herself as victim of meghan not the one who started everything first its good thing that meghan security are the ones who sound the alarm on Samantha. Because we all know how some people would reacted if it’s was meghan or harry who raised concerns about their safety or their unborn child safety we all ready know that some people thinks its ok that meghan is being attack.

  40. Chris says:

    I thought fixation was a prerequiste for Royal ‘followers’ But seriously I’m surprised MM survived the Royal vetting process given her family background.

  41. Peg says:

    Maybe for Samantha’s sake, it was a good thing she went to Kensington Palace Gardens, instead of Kensington Palace, it would’ve been a different out come.
    She is threatening to sue, but who will she sue the Duchess or Scotland Yard, and on what grounds?

  42. Princessk says:

    Over the holidays l have had a chance to look over my Together Cookbook birthday present. The recipes look really delicious, and the design of the book and photography is quite stylish, l wonder how much of a hand Meghan had in that.

    Apart from the front cover I was pleasantly surprised to find a few more pictures of Meghan very inconspicuously dotted within the book.

  43. Izzy says:

    1. Her being in a wheelchair certainly hasn’t stopped her from going over to England to harass and stalk her sister.
    2. She used the help of someone who is a stranger to Meghan to aid and abet said stalking.
    3. Replace “Samantha” with “Sam” and change the gender – NO ONE would question the need to take these precautions. This should have happened months ago.

  44. aquarius64 says:

    Sam sent a tweet to Daily Star today to make a New Years resolution to acknowledge their father for all the things he’s done for Meghan. 48 hours after the listing. Sam thinks the list is a joke; she just proved her placement was justified.

    • Olive Malone says:

      Yes and she is calling the reports about her fixated person designation “fake news.” Also saying she has the right to free speech and it’s like Nazi Germany to silence her. Crazy!

  45. C. Remm says:

    Quote: “Samantha, 53, who lives in Florida, has made a string of public snipes at Meghan since she was not invited to the Royal Wedding earlier this year.”

    This is not true. As soon as the press reported about Meghan being Harry’s new girlfriend, Samantha started the attacks on Meghan and that is why she was not invited to the wedding.

    • Mia says:

      @C. Remm: do you know if Yvonne was invited to Meghan’s first wedding?

      • C. Remm says:

        As far as I know, no she was not. You have to check with twitter, as some checked everything about her first wedding.

      • Montrealaise says:

        She did not attend and in answer to an interviewer’s question, she said she skipped the wedding because it was on a beach and she could not have navigated the sand in her wheelchair.

    • Peg says:

      No she was not invited to Meghan’s first wedding, the last time Meghan saw her was at Her 2008 GED ceremony.
      They did not speak again until she called Meghan in 2014, now she is claiming its 2016, when she had said previously it 2014, then 2015, now it’s 2016.
      She is really nuts, sending new year greetings to Meghan, with her usual call dad.
      Any normal person would step away from his mess, but no not a bully, the money is too good for thrashing Meghan, hope she save some it for her legal representation.

  46. JustSayin' says:

    “Samantha Markle has also been previously accused of racism by her own mother, Roslyn, 72, who told that her daughter would describe Meghan’s mother as ‘the maid because she is black’.

    Roslyn of Albuquerque, New Mexico, said last year: ‘When Tom Sr [Meghan’s father] married Meghan’s mom, Samantha told all her friends that Doria was the maid because she’s black. She is not a nice person.

    She added: ‘She trashes Meghan, trashes me, her dad, her brothers – she’s just been trashing everybody in her life forever.

    ‘I am very serious when I say she has dogged on Meghan forever. She has never liked Meghan and she’s always been jealous of her.’

  47. huckle says:

    Somebody needs to apply toner and deep conditioning treatment.