“The new ‘Charlie’s Angels’ looks angsty, colorful & very different” links

The Nu Charlie’s Angels look angsty and trendy. [LaineyGossip]
Quokkas really are the cutest animals. [OMG Blog]
Chrissy Teigen is crazy-rude for talking during GoT. [The Blemish]
Cory Booker thinks his thing with Rosario Dawson will last forever. [Dlisted]
Brie Larson’s Rodarte gown is terrible. [Tom & Lorenzo]
Kit Harington says words about his GoT feelings. [Jezebel]
Game of Phones answers all of your Game of Thrones questions. [Pajiba]
Tears For Fears plus Weezer = ??? [Seriously OMG]
Khloe Kardashian’s Instagram briefly went private. [Just Jared]

43rd Toronto International Film Festival - Jeremiah Terminator LeRoy - Premiere

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

26 Responses to ““The new ‘Charlie’s Angels’ looks angsty, colorful & very different” links”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Cady says:

    Looks dumb is what it looks like. Will KStew be scowling the whole time?

  2. Mabs A'Mabbin says:

    Their outfits suck lol.

  3. Tiffany says:

    Everyone I know always love them some Curt Smith, but I was always a Roland Orzabal girl. I couldn’t make up my mind, was it the voice, the hair, the shape of his face but I was all over it.

    Now if Weezer puts this version of the song on the album, they will get me money.

  4. Lucy says:

    The Game Of Phones bit was funny!! Still not getting used to seeing all of them as themselves.

  5. Beegirl says:

    this sequel, reboot, or whatever (mess) is totally unnecessary. i was fine with drew and the crew and it hasn’t been long enough yet!!! i still believe someone, somewhere still has an original idea in hollywood, please make these movies. i’m so sick of rehashing the past!

    • Tourmaline says:

      Seriously I agree 100%, why are they revisiting this? Can no one have a semi-original idea?

      • Yup, Me says:

        People of Color have been putting forth original ideas and THEIR films have been doing quite well, I’ve heard…

    • Tiffany :) says:

      It’s been almost 20 years! Two decades is plenty of time in between reboots.

      On average, the American viewing audience has a really hard time putting their butts in seats for original movies. It is hard to get angry at studios for going with the cheap investment that already has name recognition. I love originals, small films, and tend to avoid blockbuster type movies…but that isn’t what the majority of movie-goers want to see, unfortunately.

  6. minx says:

    FFS another Charlie’s Angels?

  7. Jillian says:

    I still have a lot of fun with the Cameron Diaz, Lucy Liu and drew Barrymore version

  8. Source says:

    If anything could make me run far, FAR away from this film, it’s this picture.

    i think they mean “hot mess” when they say “colorful.”

    • Tiny Martian says:

      Lol. I couldn’t agree more.

      Honestly, I think Charlie’s Angels should be a fun bit of fluff, like cotton candy. These chicas look way to serious to be taken seriously!

  9. holly hobby says:

    Ugh no thanks

    • cate says:

      agreed. this looks like a bad idea. get some new material already damn

    • PlayItAgain says:

      Agreed. I’m a pass on this one. I get enough self-important angst from the millennials at work; I don’t need it in my leisure time.

  10. SJR says:

    My kingdom for a new idea in Hollywood.

  11. Joh says:

    Lord forbid someone come up with some new ideas

  12. Snazzy says:

    I am seriously uninterested in this movie. Just zero need for another remake …

  13. dlc says:

    I’ll reserve judgement for a trailer and reviews, but the image leaves me cold.