Slumdog Millionaire kids could lose scholarships for skipping school

fp_3067412_barm_slumdog_reunion_excl_052709
While promoting Slumdog Millionaire during the last year’s awards season, director Danny Boyle and Slumdog producers promised to set up a trust for the young child actors in the film, all of whom were still living in Mumbai ghettos after their work in the film. The major controversy post-awards season was that it simply took forever for the trust to be set up – and the film’s producers came under some heavy criticism. However, eventually the trust did come together, with Danny Boyle even flying to Mumbai to see the kids and get the whole project rolling. Azharuddin Mohammed Ismail and his family were moved into a small apartment (Rubina Ali is still in a slum), and the families were told that they would only get their stipend if the kids adhered to certain conditions, like going to school full-time. Therein lies the problem. It seems the kids and their families are in danger of losing the money because the kids aren’t attending school with any kind of regularity:

Ten-year-old Rubina Ali has missed nearly 75 percent of her classes and her co-star hasn’t done much better – truancy that filmmakers say will jeopardize their trust funds and monthly stipends if it continues.

Their parents blame the absences on deaths in the family or other misfortunes, including the demolition of Rubina’s shanty by city authorities earlier this year, and have promised to do better. But the filmmakers say the children are being lured away by endorsement deals, television appearances and other opportunities to cash in on their celebrity – at the risk of losing the money set aside for them once they graduate.

“Our love got a little bit tougher today,” “Slumdog” producer Christian Colson told The Associated Press Thursday. “We understand there are opportunities for both kids – and for the parents of both children – to cash in, in the short term, on their celebrity. We don’t have a problem with that. But if they want to benefit from the trust, they have to get those attendance rates up.”

Beneath the debate about school is a deeper tug-of-war between the impoverished families’ urge for as much short-term gain as possible and the filmmakers’ desire to endow the children with a secure future.

Rubina and 11-year-old Azharuddin Mohammed Ismail both grew up in one of Mumbai’s most wretched slums. They shot to fame after starring in the rags-to-riches blockbuster, which won eight Oscars. Rubina was cast as the young Latika, who grows up to become the hero’s love interest, and Azhar plays his brother, Salim.

After filming ended, director Danny Boyle and Colson got the pair placed in a Mumbai school that helps disadvantaged children. But these days, Azhar is showing up to class just 37 percent of the time and Rubina’s attendance is only 27 percent, said Noshir Dadrawala, an administrator of the trust.

“It’s pathetic,” said Dadrawala, adding that a flurry of awards ceremonies, festivals and fashion shows that have taken the kids to Paris, Madras and elsewhere are detracting from their studies.
These have included Rubina’s Paris trip to promote a book about her life, “Slumgirl Dreaming: My Journey to the Stars,” as well as a tea party at Westminster in London, a dance number on a Hong Kong TV show and, of course, a trip to Los Angeles for the Oscars.

“They are constantly going … That’s fine, but go over the weekend, not at the sacrifice of school,” Dadrawala said.

The parents were told Thursday that if the children do not get their attendance above 70 percent they would lose their monthly $120 stipend. And if the kids fail to graduate, they will forfeit the lump sum payment set aside to help them get a start in life, Dadrawala said.

The filmmakers have declined to reveal the amount of the trust for fear of exposing the families to exploitation. In addition, both families are covered by medical insurance, which the trust finalized Thursday. Azhar’s mother, Shameem Ismail, said her son had missed school because he has been inconsolable since his father died in September from tuberculosis.

“He would cry often, so I kept him home from school for a while,” she said, promising he would go to class more often. As long as I’m alive, I will make sure my son gets an education.”

Rubina’s father, Rafiq Qureshi, said his daughter’s absences were due to the destruction of the family’s shanty last May and a cut on her leg that forced her to stay home.

“It will not happen next time,” he promised. “I also know education makes people brighter.”

In July, Azhar moved out of a sheet metal shack in the slum into a $50,000 one-bedroom apartment the filmmakers bought for his family in Mumbai. His mother said Thursday that though they quite like the apartment, where they live with a half-dozen relatives, Azhar would prefer a room of his own.

Rubina remains in the slum. The trustees say they’ve shown Rubina’s family a half-dozen apartments, all of which they rejected. Rubina’s father complained the apartments were too small or too far from his daughter’s school and said it will cost at least $73,000 to find an appropriate place.

But the filmmakers aren’t bargaining. If Rubina’s family doesn’t take a place by January, the money for the apartment will be given to a charity, Colson said.

“He’s continually turned down offers of decent accommodation we’ve offered in the hope that he can embarrass us into making more money available,” Colson said of Rubina’s dad. “We’ve got a significant sum of money sitting there, which other children could benefit from. That’s not the outcome we want. But we need Rafiq to understand we’re not here to negotiate.”

Colson and Boyle were in Mumbai this week to meet with Indian filmmakers and Bollywood megastars Anil Kapoor and Aamir Khan about several film projects, including a thriller loosely based on Suketu Mehta’s book “Maximum City,” a journalistic memoir about Mumbai’s seamy underworld. They also hosted a tea party reunion at the JW Marriott hotel in a posh neighborhood at the epicenter of Mumbai’s burgeoning film industry that was attended by many of the film’s child actors, including Tanvi Ganesh Lonkar, who played Latika as a young teenager.

As Rubina and Azhar swept into the Marriott’s marble lobby – Rubina in pink Puma sneakers and Azhar in a flashy silver and red jacket – they were ensnared in a net of popping flash bulbs and aggressive television cameramen. They began to perform for the cameras: Rubina grabbed on to the bulky biceps of a celebrity bodybuilder passing through the lobby as Azhar looked on grinning.

Asked what he wants Rubina to be when she grows up, her father said: “She should be a star.”
Dinesh Dubey, a friend of the families who attended the meeting with Boyle and Colson, said he made a special plea. “I said, ‘Danny Boyle, I just have a request to you sir: In the new film just give them one role,'” Dubey said.

Colson said he and Boyle would be happy to cast the kids in a new film, as long as it doesn’t interfere with school. “Everyone can dream,” Colson said. “But it doesn’t matter if you’re Azhar or Rubina or a kid in Milwaukee: It’s a precarious dream. My advice is go to college in case it doesn’t work out.”

[From The Huffington Post]

Ugh, I hate Rubina Ali’s dad. He sounds like the worst stage father/grifter ever. With his “help” I’m sure Rubina could conceivably become the Lindsay Lohan of Bollywood. And that’s not a good thing. As for the “tough love” aspect of the trustees… well, I think they’re being harsh, but I also think these parents (especially Rubina’s dad) could use a wake-up call. While I don’t care for the “we know best” attitude of the trustees, I kind of think that they might know best. Those kids should be in school.

Here are photos of Rubina Ali in Paris on 7/1/09. Here’s the photo description from Fame Pictures: “Slumdog Millionaire star Rubina Ali, nine, in Paris, France to launch her autobiography on July 1, 2009. These exclusive pictures are from Rubina’s personal photo album documenting her six day stay in the French capital. Her autobiography, De Mon Bidonville A Hollywood (My Slum In Hollywood), was ghostwritten by French authors Anne Berthod and Divya Dugar, and tells the story of Rubina’s journey from Mumbai’s Garib Nagar slums to the Oscars. Rubina, who played the youngest Latika in the award-winning film, devotes an entire chapter refuting a News of the World story claiming her father had tried to sell her, which she denounces as a fictitious entrapment.” Rubina and Azhar are also shown with director Danny Boyle in Mumbai on 5/27/09. Credit: BARM/Fame Pictures

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

22 Responses to “Slumdog Millionaire kids could lose scholarships for skipping school”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Firestarter says:

    I agree Kaiser, her father is disgusting! Like a cross between Joe Jackson and a feral cat.

  2. WTF?!? says:

    Don’t penalize the children for their parents’ complacency. Make them a deal to place the children with families who will keep them on a path of upward mobility (I’m sure for a monthly stipend and visitation, the parents would be more than fine with that), not these folks who can’t fathom the value of education or stability or anything beyond the money. It’s sad, but it’s the way it is, and to yank their trust funds is the last nail in the exploitation coffin.

  3. barneslr says:

    Why insult feral cats, Firestarter?

  4. Obvious says:

    The parents need the wake up call. I wouldn’t take it all away, but maybe don’t give them the money for a month. or cut the amount in half. Or better yet split it up. They basically earn $$ for each day of school, at the end of the month total how many days they went to school that’s how much they get paid. it might work. you wouldn’t endanger the kids and you’d give those parents a wake up call.

  5. Ursula says:

    That is why they should have given them the money and social workers should take care of their parents. Better still, get them personal tutors to go with them every where. They may not be stars forever but coming from such poverty, one cannot blame them for maximizing on this opportunity, it may be just fleeting.

    Rubina sure is a very beautiful girl.

  6. Firestarter says:

    Barnesir-LOL, you make a good point!

  7. QB says:

    I don’t think is fair for Azhar to loose his trust fund because of Rubina. Most kids when their father dies have a really hard time , it takes time for things to go back to normal. Plus is easy to talk about thei situation when we are not living in the same circunstance. Living in the slum is not easy , especially when you have people offering you all type of work. Is easy for us to say think about the future but a lot of people have to think about what they need to do to survive.

  8. lola says:

    I’m tired of hearing about these kids, honestly. It is not the filmaker’s job to parent them, and clearly their own parents have no regard for the amazing gift they have – and hold out hope for a cash out for themselves. If the filmmakers REALLY want to help they’ll get the wee buggers emancipated. But that girl is so brainwashed i hardly see that happening.

  9. Alecto says:

    is $120 a month enough to do anything with in india? plus i think some of these kids have large families

  10. RobN says:

    I agree with lola. The filmmakers tried to do a nice thing for these kids and it just shouldn’t be this much work. There’s nothing but griping and making excuses by the parents. Going to school is a reasonable requirement that helps secure their futures; if they can’t manage that then there are millions of kids in India who could use the help. Time to move on with this.

  11. Yup says:

    Beggars can’t be choosers. Rubinas dad is scum. She needs to get away from his grip. And I agree they already did so much I shouldn’t of been this long. Enough is enough. School is top priority. If not take it away. They were warned.

  12. lin234 says:

    I’m beginning to understand why it took so long for the trust to be put in place. It’s so easy to judge when there are two dirt poor kids and filmmakers who make/have millions. It seems like such a easy solution to say just give some of their money to help the kids. But reality is always so much more complicated. In order to help the kids you need to help their family, then the family has aunts, cousins, uncles, etc. that all want to be helped out and it just never ends.

    It seems to me both parents are angling for a bigger apartment. Azher’s mother accepted her place but was quoted saying Azher would like his own room. Rubina’s dad just seems shady. He should be satisfied he’s getting anything. I mean any apartment is better than living in the slums.

    I wouldn’t be surprised is Colson and Boyle don’t cast the two kids in another film. I’m betting there’s a sour taste in their mouths about the whole situation and I don’t see them wanting to get entangled even more in it.

    I find the entire situation a bit ironic. Slumdog millionaire showed kids from the slum being exploited for money and there was even a scene of silly bleeding heart Americans. I’m not saying the exploitation is anywhere near the horrors on film just saying the kids are being exploited in their own ways for money.

  13. valerie says:

    this is terrible…..i hope the kids wont have this taken away just cuz their parents are greedy and starstruck…its not their fault!

  14. QB says:

    I don’t feel bad for the director really, they paid the kids really low salary , then after media preasure they agree to do something and did nothing. Now they give them $120 a month and a $50,000 apartment and they are the poor filmmakers trying to do something nice.

    They have a moral obligation to these kids , those kids worked for a film that made millions and I’m supossed to aplaud the director for giving the kids $60,000???

  15. Anons says:

    Mumbai (Bombay) is one of *the* most expensive cities to live in India. What are the kids going to do with $120/month if that money is used to support them, travel costs, + the cost of their family expenses. Why is Rubina still living in a slum? They should get comfortable size appartments for these 2 kids and then either hire a private tutor or find a social worker who can make sure they’re going to school.

    For a film that’s made that much money, their child actors are surely worth more than all this nasty wrangling over money.

  16. princess pea says:

    @ QB – I hear ya, but I don’t agree. It sucks that these kids come from poverty, but Boyle et al could have hired kids with the right ethnicity who live in fabulous conditions in say… the UK. They didn’t. Anyone working on a movie signs a contract. Their contract didn’t include royalties or a cut of profit; that’s pretty normal if you’re not a big star. I guess I’m saying I don’t think there is a ‘moral obligation’ here at all.

  17. Firestarter says:

    Princess Pea- ITA with your post. Exactly.

  18. GatsbyGal says:

    I too agree with Lola. The filmmakers can only do so much, and really they have done more than they should have already.

  19. Well... says:

    That’s really sad. It’s hard to get people out of a pattern they’ve grown up in. It starts from the parents and extended family/social circle and moves on down to the kids…

  20. True_Masque says:

    @firestarter, I certainly don’t condone any of the ways that Rubina’s father has tried to exploit her and I agree with your Joe Jackson comparison…but ‘feral cat’?! I suppose since he’s from the slums of India he can be compared to a wild animal. That’s just a tasteless comment.

  21. PM says:

    Mumbai is as expensive as New York even with the currency difference. $120/month is NOTHING!! I doesn’t even cover rent for a decent apartment – it amounts to $5-$6K only. While it is not the director’s job to take care of these kids, well, he struck gold with them so its only fair that he pay them their dues. Nobody is crying foul over the director’s failure to pay Anil Kapoor, Freida, and Dev, who were under-paid, but under-paying kids from the slums is ridiculous especially since the film did so well. Anil Kapoor, a Bollywood veteran, himself admitted that he did the movie for an extremely low payment which barely made up for anything, but he is rich and was happy basking in the international attention.

    Excuses excuses about the trust taking so long, etc. Yes I completely understand why the kids’ parents must be greedy and they are wrong, but we are talking about people who have lived in poverty all their lives and now have a chance to leverage media attention to get more money. If anyone has been to India and seen the slums, one would understand the plight of these people. The parents are greedy, but the director’s payment is not that good either.

    @ Princess Pea, regarding the movie contract, you are talking about illiterate people who have no clue what a contract is and what the movie entails. No clue at all. You are talking about people who cannot read, don’t have money to hire lawyers, and go with whatever the director wants because it is a source of income which they need to make both ends meet. In other words there was full opportunity to exploit them given their poor conditions.

  22. Firestarter says:

    True_Masque- Please get over yourself. The comment had NOTHING to do with him being from the slums, it had everything to do with feral cats NOT caring for their young.

    Thank you for your righteous indignation though!