‘Spare’: Prince Harry was left alone for hours after he was told about Diana’s death

I’m well into Part 2 of Prince Harry’s Spare, but it took a long time to get through the first forty pages of the memoir. The first part is about Harry, then 12 years old, being told his mother has died and what happened in the days and weeks afterwards. In the earlier reporting about then-Prince Charles telling his younger son that Diana died, people were making a big deal about how Charles didn’t hug Harry at any point when Charles told a 12-year-old child that his mother was dead. But the most shocking and appalling part is that… Charles left his child alone for hours in his room right after:

They tried, darling boy. I’m afraid she didn’t make it. These phrases remain in my mind like darts in a board. He did say it that way, I know that much for sure. She didn’t make it.

And then everything seemed to come to a stop.

That’s not right. Not seemed. Nothing at all seemed. Everything distinctly, certainly, irrevocably, came to a stop.

None of what I said to him then remains in my memory. It’s possible that I didn’t say anything. What I do remember with startling clarity is that I didn’t cry. Not one tear.

Pa didn’t hug me. He wasn’t great at showing emotions under normal circumstances, how could he be expected to show them in such a crisis? But his hand did fall once more on my knee and he said: It’s going to be OK.

That was quite a lot for him. Fatherly, hopeful, kind. And so very untrue.

He stood and left. I don’t recall how I knew that he’d already been in the other room, that he’d already told Willy, but I knew.

I lay there, or sat there. I didn’t get up. I didn’t bathe, didn’t pee. Didn’t get dressed. Didn’t call out to Willy or Mabel. After decades of working to reconstruct that morning I’ve come to one inescapable conclusion: I must’ve remained in that room, saying nothing, seeing no one, until nine a.m. sharp, when the piper began to play outside.

[From Spare, by Prince Harry]

Charles just… left him there. For hours. Alone. The whole family let a 12-year-old boy sit alone for hours after his mother died. I made this point on Twitter yesterday and I’ll make it again here: I know very well that there was no “right thing” or perfect way to handle this situation. God knows, Charles was probably in shock as well (although…). But for no one in the family to simply come sit with him or hold his hand or try to get him to talk, that broke my heart. It doesn’t sound like anyone did that the entire week. Then, when his mother’s coffin went into the ground at Althorp, Harry broke down in tears… and no one comforted him at Althorp either. He had to comfort himself:

When the hearse finally got to Althorp the coffin was removed again and carried across the pond, over a green iron bridge hastily positioned by military engineers, to a little island, and there it was placed upon a platform. Willy and I walked across the same bridge to the island. It was reported that Mummy’s hands were folded across her chest and between them was placed a photo of me and Willy, possibly the only two men who ever truly loved her. Certainly the two who loved her most. For all eternity we’d be smiling at her in the darkness, and maybe it was this image, as the flag came off and the coffin descended to the bottom of the hole, that finally broke me. My body convulsed and my chin fell and I began to sob uncontrollably into my hands.

I felt ashamed of violating the family ethos, but I couldn’t hold it in any longer.

It’s OK, I reassured myself, it’s OK. There aren’t any cameras around.

Besides, I wasn’t crying because I believed my mother was in that hole. Or in that coffin. I promised myself I’d never believe that, no matter what anyone said. No, I was crying at the mere idea. It would just be so unbearably tragic, I thought, if it was actually true.

[From Spare, by Prince Harry]

NO ONE REASSURED HIM. No one held him. No one put a supportive hand on his shoulder. He had to reassure himself. The consistent references in his early years to this magical thinking, his mother’s “disappearance,” his mum “hiding,” that kept breaking my heart too. The fact that Harry even has empathy for his father being terrible at parenting too – Jesus Christ.

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

165 Responses to “‘Spare’: Prince Harry was left alone for hours after he was told about Diana’s death”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Abby says:

    I just got to the point in the book where he finally accepted that she actually died. AS AN ADULT. These parts of the book broke my heart. For both of them, but especially for Harry. The way he shares about his experiences is so touching. It’s amazing he has the emotional depth that he has, being raised the way that he was.

    • Millennial says:

      I can see why both boys are mental health advocates (even if one sucks at it). I’m appalled that no one in that family thought to get them a grief therapist. Harry believing his mother would return for 10 years. Wow.

      Im also appalled they turned around and sent Harry to boarding school mere weeks after Diana’s death. I think boarding school is weird already, but basically they low key abandoned him at the worst time in his life.

      • Cara says:

        I also lost a parent at a young age and the people around you just want you to get back to normal as soon as possible. Kind of a “that? You haven’t moved on yet?” Because if you’re still struggling, then they have to deal with it themselves or even acknowledge that maybe they didn’t handle it correctly. Thankfully, my mother was much better than Charles.

        I think if you asked any of the people around Harry, they think they did the best they could under the situation. What does he expect? They have their own families/jobs/responsibilities. How long are they supposed to hold his hand over this? Or on the flip side, they pity you. And that’s even worse.

      • mtos says:

        It’s heartbreaking. It makes me want to hug young Harry. 🙁 As a mom of young kids I just cannot fathom being this cold to a child who lost his mother. It’s unreal. These people are awful. They are horrible. Just no words. The “Royal Family” is royal only in title. Just terrible people.

      • Erin says:

        @cara-I’m so sorry you had to go through the loss of a parent and I’m glad your mother was a better support for you.

        That second paragraph though, are you saying that those are things that the family would say to Harry or are you saying that about him? Because that seems pretty cruel to say to a 12 year old, how long does he expect to hold his hand? They have responsibilities and families? First of all, Diana was seemingly the only person that showed him support or love in any meaningful and normal way so loosing that one and only person as a child? Then being expected to just bounce back because you are in the public eye constantly? Also, his father and everyone else in that family hardly have normal jobs and responsibilities to get back too. They make their own schedules and no one would’ve begrudged them taking as much time off that they needed to support those boys. The entire country was gutted over Diana’s death. They just have no interest outside of themselves so they didn’t want to have to deal with Harry and the aftermath of the death of his MOTHER and it was a terrible tragic death at that. Strangers were sobbing in the streets but Harry shouldn’t expect to have his hand held after the funeral?

      • Jennifer says:

        How the hell do you go “back to normal” after your mother died?! Literally you can’t.

      • aftershocks says:

        @Millennial: “I can see why both boys are mental health advocates (even if one sucks at it).”

        It’s not that Willy ‘sucks at it.’ It’s that Willy is NOT really an advocate for mental health at all. The Royal Foundation’s mental health advocacy and projects (including Heads Together) were all Harry’s ideas. W&K, as usual, just lazily attached themselves to Harry’s coattails. FFS, Willy never got help himself, because heirs to the throne are supposed to be so automatically problem-free, or at least pretend to be. Willy can’t even put a good face on all the performative public pretense and pretentiousness. 🙄

  2. BrazenHussy says:

    This part in the book broke me. Imagine 12 years old losing your mom and no one comforts you. I hope Diana is looking down & giving Harry all of the strength and happiness she would have wanted for him.

    • Nlopez says:

      It broke me too. I had to put the book down for awhile. It’s painful how carelessly the rf treated Harry and William. I can’t stand William, but I feel bad for both of them still. You only get one mother SMH.

      • bananapanda says:

        The crazy thing is that both QEII and Charles had their mothers around well into their 60s/70s yet had no empathy for children losing Diana.

        I find it odd that Will didn’t go into Harry’s room. The narrative for decades has been how close the boys are and how they bonded after her death.

        Re: UK Boarding schools start at shockingly young ages. In the US most boarding schools start in high school (age 15), maybe middle school (age 12/13). I was horrified to learn UK had schools starting in first grade (5/6 yrs). Unless your parents are in India or Hong Kong circa 1800s this seems inexcusable.

      • mtos says:

        I’m with you. Although I have no use for William and believe really is a horrible, racist man child, I feel for young William. Those boys deserved so much more. They should have been comforted and allowed to grieve for as long as necessary.

      • AmelieOriginal says:

        Yeah you’d think the QUEEN would be empathetic about losing a parent? She lost hers at 25 and we’ve long been told it greatly affected her. It’s one of the reasons she always stayed at Sandringham until February 6th, the anniversary of the day her father died. I don’t get why the Queen was so removed from her own family because from all accounts King George and Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon were very involved and caring parents and the four of them (including Margaret) were very close. She somehow became this distant, cold, removed matriarch and I never understood why! She wasn’t starved for affection as a kid like Charles.

      • Cairidh says:

        The Qm and Elizabeth and Margaret were considered a very close happy family. But I read Qm only saw them for an hour a day when they were children….so it’s all relative.

      • aftershocks says:

        ^^ Exactly @Cairidh. While George VI and Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon were loving parents, they were also old-fashioned and traditional. Sadly, they didn’t provide Elizabeth and Margaret with academic educations. The U.K. government had to intervene and teach Princess Elizabeth something about history and a lot about the U.K. government and Constitution, when she was 13. 👀 Margaret was not included in those lessons! Both girls should have been given full educations, along with the opportunity to be around more children their own ages, aside from their cousins and a few aristo companions.

        Also, unfortunately George VI, who referred to his wife and daughters as ‘Us Four,’ spoiled Margaret without restraint. Both parents thought spoiling Margaret was the best way to compensate for her being the spare and not the heir. 😳 🤪

    • Krista says:

      I’m wishing Diana had risen from the grave and rained hellfire down on that family for doing that to one of her boys.

      • LovelyRita says:

        @Krista
        Maybe she is and the show is starting, lol.

      • phaedra7 says:

        And for trying to destroy the reputation plus wellbeing of her son’s wife/daughter-in-law plus their children/her grandchildren! 👆☝🏽

      • booboocita says:

        @Krista — she was just biding her time, getting strong, getting her preferred instrument of mass destruction ready. And now that said instrument is ready, with loving wife at his side to support him, well … let the hellfire begin!

        Harry says it took years for him to realize and accept that she was gone. She never left. She lives on in her son, and now his children.

    • ariel says:

      I watched Patton Oswalt’s special (netflix) called Annihilation where he talks about the sudden death of his wife, and having to tell his 6 year old daughter.
      And 1) he said having to tell her was more painful than actually losing his wife- and will stay with him much longer
      2) he asked the school for advice and they were kind of amazing- they said- don’t tell her after school- she can’t come home, find out, and have to go to bed reeling from that- instead, tomorrow, keep her out of school, go have a fun morning, then at noon tell her. “Tell her in the sunshine”. Then, it will be awful, but be there with her as she processes it for the rest of the day/night.

      I kept thinking about that when i read about Harry being woken up, told and LEFT alone with no comfort.
      I mean -to lose your mom is unimaginably awful- but the difference in being able to process trauma, and being LEFT ALONE- is mind boggling.
      Even for emotionally stunted bad parents- charles should win a prize.

  3. Noki says:

    I have family members who are devoid of emotions so I know these people exist. It’s just sad because with the RF it seems more about keeping that untouchable almost not human mystique. Not natural and very cold.

    • Lolo86lf says:

      My guess is that they showed no emotions because they hated her. Harry grew up in the midst of people who loathed his mother.

      • Ameerah M says:

        They showed no emotions because they were told to never do so. He even says so in the book. Crying was frowned upon in the family.

      • Tessa says:

        THe Queen cried over the retirement of the yacht Britannia.

      • Noki says:

        @Tessa I think she also was seen crying when Windsor burned, maybe things that reminded her of her childhood and father are the only things that tugged her.

      • susan says:

        there’s many ways that Harry saw-and feared-that history would repeat itself, and I think that even the possibility of becoming a parent convinced him what would happen to his own kids if they stayed.

      • B says:

        @LOLO86LF
        Yes. Probably exactly that.

      • Luna says:

        One must be heartless to leave their 12 year old alone after letting him know that his mom has left the world. It breaks my heart and I wish I could’ve been there to comfort him, poor Harry.

    • nutella toast says:

      I get that you aren’t supposed to show public (i.e. newspaper photograph potential) emotion but there were no photographers there – no one to keep a stiff upper lip for and they were KIDS. Did anyone comfort William? Was he also left alone? There’s a part of me that wants to know just how far the “spare” part went – I hope they didn’t just comfort one of them because for me that would be unforgivable on every level.

  4. Loretta says:

    Harry loved his mom so much, it’s all so heartbreaking

  5. Tessa says:

    Charles said it’s going to be OK? No it was not OK, Harry lost his mother, she died. That is NEVER OK. What is wrong with Charles.

    • Lemons says:

      I’m not going to come at him for saying that. That’s normal.

      It’s not normal to then leave your grieving kids alone for hours after giving them the news. If he can’t be there, send the nanny or his sister (their aunt!)…literally anyone close to them.

      • molly says:

        Anne might be the absolute last person I’d send in to comfort someone. She doesn’t exactly strike me as a hugger.

        I have no doubt Diana’s sisters were going through their own shock, and by all accounts, THEIR childhood wasn’t really full of love either, but I wish they would stepped up (or been given access) to be there for the boys.

      • Steph says:

        @Molly, I always forget she had sisters. How come they weren’t behind her casket? Is it only men?

      • AmelieOriginal says:

        @Steph: only the men walked behind Diana’s casket during that procession. So the only direct male member of Diana’s family, her younger brother Charles Spencer, walked behind her casket (Diana’s father died in 1992 so he predeceased her). Had Diana had only daughters, they would have not been asked to walk… though I shudder to think if she had had one son and a daughter, would they have asked the son to walk and not the daughter? We’ll never know.

      • Ciotog says:

        Harry doesn’t talk about the Spencers in the book, but he does thank them in the acknowledgements, so I hope he did get some support from them over the years.

      • Jennifer says:

        There’s brief mentions of the Spencers around the funeral (Uncle Charles is mentioned, the aunts went to Paris), but I can’t speak for the full book yet.

    • SarahLee says:

      I’ll clock Charles for a lot of crap, but not that. I’m also not hung up on him not hugging Harry. I keep flashing back to the video of the Queen returning from a months-long journey, young Charles waiting for her, and…….she shakes his hand. Truly. It’s not wonder Charles doesn’t know how to parent. Generational trauma.

      • H says:

        Nah. Charles was a grown up man. Generational trauma is a big serious deal of course, but at some point to some extent you do have a responsibility to grow the heck up, get therapy or read a frigging blog post that says how important hugs are, and develop the sense god gave an earthworm to HUG YOUR KID WHEN HIS MOTHER DIED. Charles gets no pass for that and I’m appalled at those who are willing to bend over backwards in the name of Charles’s trauma to absolve him of being a grown man and father causing untold trauma to his kids that he still doesn’t seem like he’s corrected to this day or attempted to, like with a simple “I handled that badly, you were a child and deserved to be hugged, may I hug you now/at a time you’re ready etc.” You’re not a good kind enlightened person for giving Charles a pass; you’re just condoning further trauma that actually happened to these boys, and condoning it in general terms. Would you say this about your own sibling doing this to your nieces/nephews? If so, you need more help than any of us are qualified to give, so good luck.

        I’m not trying to be mean, or to attack personally, but it just seems incredibly difficult to say this without it coming off that way. And I think this is necessary to say because, no, the fact that someone went through trauma IS NOT A PASS FOR INFLICTING MORE OF IT ON A CHILD. Your mom shook your hand when you wanted a hug instead? Go to therapy or read a self help book or talk to good parents you admire so you can have the heart to hug your own kids this is not rocket science.

    • Mel says:

      It was normal for Charles to say that. What wasn’t normal is that no one sat with these kids and let them cry or talk about their Mother, instead they were marched off to church and the Vicar ignored their pain or any attempt to encourage them under orders from their Granny. I understand she thought she was helping but dear lord, they expected these kids to ignore the fact that their Mother was dead and they should just go about business as usual? They took them HUNTING????!!!! That family is an entire dumpster fire mess.

  6. Snuffles says:

    You would think at the BARE MINIMUM William would have come into the room to check on his little brother, to find solace in each other. But apparently not. If William was sitting in shock, maybe their nanny could have brought them together. I find it hard to believe that NO ONE in that house, staff or family, felt the need to check on him. It’s almost like they were told not to.

    I’ve gotten to that part of the book and Harry to excuse his Dad basically saying he was simply incapable of comforting him because he was never particularly affectionate. Certainly nothing like Diana. Thank God she was there for 12 years showering him with love and affection while she could because who know what Harry would have turned into.

    • Lolo86lf says:

      Agree. Diana was the antidote to the royal family’s cold, stuffy, unaffectionate demeanor.

      • Ciotog says:

        He does say that she tended to “overmother” and then disappear. I don’t think he got consistently loving parenting from either of his parents.

    • TikiChica says:

      I would have thought they would have been told together.

      • Brassy Rebel says:

        I always assumed that they were. Never assume with this family.

      • PunkPrincessPhD says:

        In the book Harry says William was told first. I.e. He was awoken by Charles, and he knew William would already have been told before him

    • Steph says:

      Keeping Pegs away was probably the only right thing they did. At 15, his raging was probably already a thing. We know now that he’s ok with abusing Harry over petty stuff, I can’t imagine he would have been any good dealing with such a real tragedy.

    • ThatsNotOkay says:

      As always with this family, the truth is so much worse than the horror we’d been told.

      I do think it’s important to see the body—the shell of the person who is being laid to rest, for closure, for sanity. Even for kids, especially.

    • AmelieOriginal says:

      I’m not going to hold a 15 year old William accountable for not comforting his younger brother. William may be a lot of things but I’m not holding a teenager accountable for the way he grieved his mom.

      • H says:

        Same. William was a child himself growing up in all of this. Charles was the adult. You’re old enough to get married? Have children? Be crown prince? Run a duchy? You’re old enough to read a blog post about emotional availability, or talk to parents you admire, or secretly hire a therapist, or keep a journal where you’re honest about your feelings, and learn how to undo the bare minimum top layer of trauma so you can hug your own children and tell them that you’re there for them to witness and support their complicated feelings. Or to arrange therapists for them if you can’t do it. Hire extra nannies if you think feelings and hugs are a woman’s realm. Hire folks to create safe spaces for them to express themselves LIKE THIS IS NOT DIFFICULT DO SOMETHING. It was not for William to take on the responsibility of comforting his own brother, both of them children. Would have helped, I’m sure, but I’m not going to hold that against a child, and a very emotionally stunted one at that.

      • Steph says:

        I’m not holding William accountable for Harry’s support. I’m saying him not being a support system to Harry may have been beneficial to Harry. I was Harry’s she when I lost my Dad. I was rage filled. Pegs was already rumored to be showing his signs of this before Diana died. I can see W’s grief being transferred to rage and then taking it out on Harry. And I’m not saying that this is W who is currently a monster. I’m talking about a kid who didn’t know how to process his emotions not being useful to another kid in the same position. This is all failure on the adults in their lives.

    • Sarge says:

      Wouldn’t surprise me if William was comforted and Harry left on his own

    • Mel says:

      As obnoxious as William comes across, he was a 15yr old kid, it was NOT his job to comfort his brother when he needed it also. Their FATHER and GRANDPARENTS, heck any adult in that house, failed them both.

  7. girl_ninja says:

    Waiting for folks to yell at Harry to get over it. That he’s an adult now and to move on. His loss and how it was treated could have destroyed and nearly did but he is stronger and braver than anyone of his family realized.

    • Carrot says:

      I was a little older than Harry when it was my mum and a few months later, not even years, “Get over it” is exactly what family members! said to me. Probably Harry’s heard that one plenty. Some people…

      • Bunny says:

        Same. My family expected the same from my sister and me. When we got the final autopsy report a few months later, I completely broke down. I was told, “ why are you so upset? It’s not like it happened yesterday.” Plus my own father tried to sue us for the trust my mother set up. Yeah, families are messy.

  8. Steph says:

    I haven’t got my hands on the book yet. Who is Mabel? His nanny?

  9. Tessa says:

    Charles rather callously resumed the Camilla campaign less than a year after Diana died. Introducing them to her and even using Harry and William in the PR. Must have been devastating for Harry. What a bad father. The campaign could have waited.

    • TikiChica says:

      Well yes, the Camilla campaign was in full swing when Diana died, which put a spanner in the works. People who said in a previous post that Charles wanted Diana dead in order to marry Camilla forget the new damage that Diana’s death did to Camilla’s image.

      • SomeChick says:

        just because it damaged Camilla’s image doesn’t mean that Charles didn’t want it. you may be forgetting that he couldn’t remarry while Diana lived.

        Charles wants what he wants when he wants it. and he feels entitled to same. nevermind what it does to anyone else.

  10. Christine says:

    This was such a hard part to read about I almost stopped and skipped it. How awful! I lost my own dad at 18 and was full of hugging and crying and talking….and it still wrecked me for years. I cannot imagine!

  11. Becks1 says:

    As I said on twitter, it took me a LONG time to get through those first 40, 50 pages because I kept crying. It was so heartbreaking.

    I think its one of those situations where there may not be a clear right way to handle it, but there is a clear wrong way. Leaving a 12 year old boy alone in his bed for hours after you’ve told him his mother has died is the wrong way.

    I remember reading a comment back from this time, around Diana’s death, in a newspaper or magazine or something, and it was about how the boys were being paraded around for the crowds and Charles wasn’t even touching them and the line was something like “if the situation were reversed, Diana would have been all over those boys, she never would have let them out of her arms.”

    Charles obviously isn’t/wasn’t Diana and did not parent the same way. But your sons just tragically lost their mother in an absolutely horrific way. Stay with him in the bedroom for a bit goddamnit.

    • Lucy says:

      I’m almost done with part 1, I think. I got the audio book yesterday. The way he refers to his mother’s “disappearance” keeps making me cry.

      On Twitter, and even in the Colbert YouTube comments, there’s been a huge number of people talking about how they lost a parent around the same age, and they did the same magical thinking. It’s really heartbreaking. A few have said they didn’t fully accept the parent was gone until they had their own children, in their thirties.

      It’s also striking how much he isn’t whining in what I’m reading. There’s nothing self pitying, it’s just this happened and this happened, I think they did the best they could and I wasn’t in a place to know what to ask for. I can judge the hell out of the adults for not doing better though.

      • Byzant says:

        Honestly I lost my mum ten years ago in my early twenties and I still sometimes dream that it was all a mistake or she was a spy and had to go but will come back. The hardest thing is when you wake up and it hits you again.

  12. Naomi says:

    …and then the turn of the screw is that this whole time the official line from BP about why QEII remained in Balmoral for so long was for the well-being of her grandsons. So she wanted, apparently, to keep them in Balmoral to protect them emotionally but… not a single person at Balmoral actually offered Harry any emotional protection, from a hand-hold to a hug to a pat on the back.

    No words.

    • Myra says:

      That’s a very good point. I have seen people defend her by saying she stayed to protect the kids, but the kids weren’t protected at all. They were left alone. No grief counselling, had to go to service, had to shake people’s hands and smile at them, forced to walk behind her carriage, not allowed to cry in public, then sent back to boarding school. Unbelievable.

    • Carty says:

      I’ve seen no mention of his granny doing any comforting at all either. I imagine if she had he would have written about it. She was a cold stunted woman.

    • ElleV says:

      I can believe the Queen thought she was protecting them, insofar as she believed the less you directly engage with unpleasant realities the better

      by that warped standard, keeping the boys away from public scrutiny while ignoring their emotional needs could be viewed as “protective,” if what you’re trying to protect them from is fully engaging with Diana’s death

    • Mel says:

      Well, her way of “dealing with things” was to pretend that the issue didn’t exist and to just to ignore it until it went away or someone else handled it.

  13. Hummingbird says:

    I wrote elsewhere last night that this revelation rocked me to my core. We know they are a bunch of automatons, programmed all their sad, joyless lives to show no emotion in public but, when it suits them, they show images of themselves as just like us. Look! We ride bikes, we barbecue, we have spirited children yada yada. But I honestly didn’t expect that, at the worst moment in any child’s life, these robots couldn’t show some compassion and comfort to those boys.
    No wonder they are all so screwed up.

    • ElleV says:

      what really strikes me is how little division between their public work persona and private life there is

      i wonder if that’s some weird consequence of keeping servants? i once read an interesting book about upstairs/downstairs life called “not in front of the servants” and it made links between victorian morality/perversion/formality/repression and the constant class performance involved in having servants in the home

      obviously this is something royals bring on themselves but it’s still an interesting dynamic

  14. C-Shell says:

    Harry’s denial for YEARS, that his Mummy was hiding, had “disappeared” not died, even seeing the pap pics of her body in the terrible wreckage of that car, appearing undamaged, fed into his tragic defensiveness against the reality; it’s beyond heartbreaking. God only knows how much rationalization he wove into an impenetrable wall during those endless hours they left him alone. This family deserves every iota of criticism they’ve ever received. This is more than dysfunction.

    😭😭😭

  15. Steph says:

    I’m a few months older than Harry. I lost my Dad a few months before he lost his mom. Seeing the difference in the way people reacted to her death and how they think it affected her sons is what got me started on royal watching. Unlike Harry, I knew my Dad’s death was imminent. Yet, I can still say, there is no right way to tell a child their parent has died. However, when I didn’t cry, I was told it was ok to. I shelled up like Harry did but bc at 12, I just didn’t know how to process my emotions. Unlike Harry, I was never scared of however that would come out. Even if they didn’t know exactly how to support me (bc who the hell does?) I knew they’d try their best and love me regardless. It’s so sad that Harry didn’t have that security at such a hard and fragile time in his life.

    • Flower says:

      ^^ I think this is the key – knowing that people are there for you.

      The overwhelming sense I get from Spare was that from the moment his mother died, Harry felt alone.

      His father was unable to comfort him.

      His brother bullied and shunned him whilst expecting loyalty at all times.

      The whole situation is a mess.

  16. Inge says:

    AND that after he’d been left alone for hours they were taken to church and then was paraded for the public, and cursed himself for grabbing his dads hand for support because the paparazzi’s franticly took pics.

    Awful, horrible family.

  17. Sugarhere says:

    To their defense, it’s hard to order a hit and extend a soothing hand at the same time. Their iciness and aloofness kind of make sense in that respect.

    By the way, was Lady Susan Hussey unavailable or too busy to comfort a disoriented orphan? Whatever love means.

  18. OriginalLeigh says:

    It’s heartbreaking that no one was there to tell a 12 year old boy that it’s okay to cry. He actually felt ashamed of “violating the family ethos.” No wonder there are so many terrible people in that family if that’s how they raise kids…. I’m glad that Harry seems to have broken the toxic cycle for his children, and I hope Will and Kate are making an effort to do better for their kids…

  19. Canadian says:

    I was shocked – the colossal failure of the adults in that family to support H&W through their grief is astounding.

  20. Flower says:

    This is essentially child abuse.

    They were unable to empathise with Harry because they lack basic humanity and they did not see his needs as important.

    Also as I’ve said before both William and Kate are very stilted and wooden and in somatic terms don’t appear to fully inhabit their bodies, again signs of childhood trauma and poor attachment.

    Harry and Meghan by contrast are warm and expressive like (Diana), a sign of secure attachment. It’s interesting in the book that Harry says that he lost a lot of his memories before the age of 12, I suspect that this was a protective mechanism by his brain to shield him from the pain he could not/ was not allowed to express thereby holding him in emotional suspended animation and stunting his emotional and psychological growth. Then when he reached adulthood and later met Megan another securely attached (but also slightly traumatised partner) he was able to feel and remember his mother’s warmth again and finally confront his emotions.

    This book has been very hard to read in parts – I keep thinking how bad a parent can Charles be? Granted Harry is the son of the King of England, but it still shows how many deficits a human being can experience.

    Harry needs to move on from his family, he is not like them. He is an empath surrounded by power hungry sociopaths and he needs to swallow that very bitter pill. It’s also not fair to subject Meghan, Archie and Lili to his family in the hopes that they’ll have their come to Jesus moment, it just will not happen.

    Also just wanted to state that the above also explains so much why William and Kate are inexplicably so angry at Harry leaving. They that decision to leave as an abandonment and betrayal – which is insane given how they treated him and his family. The dynamic of Harry being the giver life kept their dysfunctional marriage ticking over. I’m not sure if Willy’s Rose pruning antics amplified when Harry met Meghan or before, but Harry’s decision to self determinate seems to have had an effect on the Wails marriage.

    • Saucy&Sassy says:

      Flower, what an interesting observation. I realised that Harry did treat Wails as a real person when he did engagements with the two of them. I’m not sure Fails recognizes people as people unless he’s looking at them straight on. What I hadn’t considered is that Harry was underpinning that marriage by his existence and close proximity. It gives me more to think about. I can see Fails and Wail drawing closer when they joined in the smearing of Meghan. I thought that since their favorite person to bully wasn’t there and the spare to do the work and be a press distraction was gone their marriage was what it was supposed to be. A marriage of convenience. But I think you’re right that Harry was an element that held that marriage together in some way. Certainly, it appears to me that Fails and Wails dislike each other at this point.

      The future for those two will be quite interesting to watch.

      • Flower says:

        @Saucy&Sassy Harry is an Empath and empaths are often people pleasers who can sense other people’s deficiencies and will seek to fill those spaces as they feel doing so keeps everyone happy and by extension they are then safe.

        Problem is that’s pretty draining and lonely so it must have taken it’s toll on him. I suspect also to some extent that William expected Harry to look after Kate leaving him free to be truly vested in The Firm publicly.

        There’s a very famous picture where William is walking away from Kate and Harry is having to remind him that she’s still waiting for him – I think she’s wearing a red dress. It illustrates this point perfectly. William had got used to Harry doing some of the heavy lifting where Kate was concerned.

      • SomeChick says:

        @Flower, the incident I remember is the three of them were doing an engagement (I think on a boat?) and it was raining. Willy strides away from the exit with his big umbrella, Harry calls out to him, and he turns back and collects Kate. I have seen this on video. the boat was red iirc, but it’s been a while.

      • Flower says:

        @SomeChick that’s the one I’m referring to.

        It’s circa 2014 and Kate is wearing a red dress.

        There is then an engagement the next day reported in the FAIL where William makes a concerted effort to cover Kate with his umbrella.

        The body language between them all then compared as to now is like night an day.

  21. Kendikane says:

    The Queen made it known that she was “with her grandsons” while trying to shield herself from the criticism that she was indifferent to Diana’s death. Why wasn’t she there either during or right after Harry was told? Where was Prince Philip? Why did they force them to go to church where there was no mention of their mother’s death or prayers offered for the repose of her soul or solace for the grieving family? The treatment of Meghan really opened up some traumatic memories from those horrible days. There was no grieving because they truly hated Diana. Meghan evoked those same feelings in them. Sad!

    • Flower says:

      ^^ Good point…

      • Wanda says:

        I remember reading years ago that because they didn’t mention Diana or offer prayers for her during the church service, that Harry thought it must have been a mistake saying she died.

    • SadieMae says:

      I keep thinking about QE2 in all this. I think Charles, for whatever reason, is a person incapable of forming loving family ties, incapable of thinking about anybody but himself, anything but what *he* wants. I don’t think he can be any other way. And Harry, while loving him, seems to understand this. There’s a distance there and it sounds like there always has been.

      But Harry adored the Queen. Referred to her many times as his beloved grandma. Named his daughter for her. She was there at Balmoral when Diana died, and as you say, she later said she’d stayed there to be there for the boys. So where was she?? I mean, given that she wasn’t responding in her role as queen – so it’s not like all her time/attention was caught up in planning/giving an immediate statement, making a speech, making arrangements for the state funeral she only reluctantly gave permission for later – why the hell wasn’t she with the boys, especially since she must have known their father would be no comfort to them? She was their grandmother! If those were my grandsons I would have moved heaven and earth to be with them, hug them, listen to their feelings, let them cry.

      Of all the revelations so far from “Spare,” I think this is the worst. Worse than the physical abuse. I just don’t understand how anyone could treat a young child like this. Much less the family who purport to love him. (And it explains a LOT about William that he was obviously treated in the same way.)

    • booboocita says:

      She seems to have thought that her presence in the same room as Harry and/or William was comfort enough. What a completely weird, dysfunctional, deranged family — and what a weird, dysfunctional, shut-down woman she was. “Comfort my grandchildren? I’m here, aren’t I?”

    • Cairidh says:

      William said he wanted to go to church “to talk to mummy”. He wasn’t forced to go, I don’t know about Harry.
      The queen had been up all night in a different room from her son Charles, who was also distraught. He went outside for a walk in the early hours and wept bitterly.
      So the queen wasn’t comforting him either, they were in different rooms, communicating via staff.

  22. Miranda says:

    I’m on my honeymoon. On the day Spare was released, my husband arranged to go diving so I could sit on the beach and listen/read all day, expecting me to be almost finished. Instead, he returned that afternoon to find me sobbing, and THIS was why. I couldn’t get past this part.

    I lost my mom, also quite suddenly, when I was 5, so Harry speaking about Diana triggers something in me every time, but hearing him describe the hours and days after his mother’s death, and the utter neglect from his family…I just lost it. When my dad told me my mom had died, I dropped to the floor and screamed and sobbed, and my dad got down on the floor to hold me and comfort me. For hours. And this was repeated almost every day until the funeral. On that day, as they lowered the casket into the ground, I burst into tears and started wailing, and my sister-in-law immediately picked me up to soothe me and turn my head away from the sight. Eventually she just took me to the car and let me lie down in the backseat while she stroked my hair. Additionally, my dad immediately arranged for counseling. In other words, everyone around me tried their best to comfort me and see that I wouldn’t be totally traumatized. To this day, 25 years later, my dad occasionally apologizes for not taking me home before the burial and asks if he did things the right way in the aftermath.

    Despite everybody’s best efforts, I’ve never fully recovered from losing my mom so suddenly, but no one expected me to, especially not at the time, when I was just a child. It’s just incomprehensible to me that a little boy would not be hugged after being told his mother died. Would not be hugged, would not be allowed to break down and sob…but would simply be left alone with his thoughts. Who the fuck does that to a child?! The cruelty, the obliviousness…it’s infuriating.

    • Lucy says:

      So sorry for your loss Miranda. I hope the rest of your honeymoon goes lovely, congratulations on your marriage.

    • Steph says:

      @miranda, first, congrats on your marriage! Second, may I suggest putting the book down until after your honeymoon? I think in the long run, this book may help you on your healing journey but I think you should also enjoy your honeymoon. Third, I’m sorry for your loss.

      • Miranda says:

        Thanks! And yes, I read a bit more, but then realized it was going to be too upsetting. Only reading little excerpts in posts here until I’m back home!

    • Lux says:

      Thanks so much for sharing. I’m so sorry for your loss and it’s very touching that not only did your husband give you alone time to read the book on your honeymoon, he was there to comfort you when it caused you to relive memories and cry. What your family did was so incredibly supportive and loving, and it showed that that environment allowed you, at 5, to fully process what was going on and be in touch with your emotions right away. You understood right away, what your loss meant, whereas Harry, at age 12, had to create a fictional scenario in order to stop himself from feeling and facing what had happened. Both of you deserve all the love that comes your way.

    • Mabs A'Mabbin says:

      Oh God Miranda. I’m so sorry. Your hubs sounds amazing, leaving you on the beach for some YOU time! And congratulations btw! You sobbing tells me walking in slowly with Spare is the only way for me to go because I’d be right there with you in the sand sobbing. It’s unfathomable what H had to endure. Unfathomable.

    • Anonymous says:

      Miranda, my deepest condolences! I also second Steph’s comments, in suggesting you put the book and even this site and the internet down (I know it’s hard when it’s connected to your camera on your phone, but you can do it!), so you can avoid this trigger for now and most importantly, be fully present for yourself and your husband on your honeymoon!! It’s a digital detox that you’ll never, ever regret. We’ll all be here when you get back, Enjoy & All the Best🙏❤️

    • j says:

      Wow, what a harrowing account. Thank you for sharing that piece of your life. It sounds like you had a loving, attentive family during a terrible time. The fact that your dad still wonders and asks if he did the right thing speaks volumes. So many of the comments here saying Charles did “the best he could” but I don’t buy it. There was so, so much more to be done for those boys. The normalization of such neglect is scary. As though whatever a parent does is their “best”. The rf should be so lucky to have you and your family’s compassion.

  23. Harper says:

    Absolutely cruel of Charles to toddle off then to stuff those boys into suits and take them to church and a photo op. I don’t see it as William’s job to comfort Harry in that moment, but it’s so strange that neither of them tiptoed over to the other to say Are you there? Do you think it’s true? Seems like Harry froze after hearing the news–a typical trauma response. Perhaps William was frozen too. It’s also interesting the Harry didn’t say though that week was a blur, I remember my granny treating us so well and being there for us in that time. Maybe she was? I think in reality they were all freaking out about the world’s response and figured, oh, the Scottish hills and valleys will heal the boys while we worry about our poll numbers.

    • Flower says:

      Hate to say it but Charles likely Toddled off to celebrate with his mistress and yes I do think C&C Adultery Factory celebrated the fact they had a way out.

      Camilla’s campaign for marriage literally starts a year later – presumably after the mourning period.

      • SomeChick says:

        C&C Adultery Factory!!! you go, Flower!!!

        I think they celebrated too. I’m sure he couldn’t wait to get to her. it was what they both desired. sure, it blew up in their faces, but that’s par for the course with these goons.

    • PunkPrincessPhD says:

      @Harper: That whole situation has very Anna-from-Frozen vibes, when she is left alone to (not) process her grief after the death of their parents, and Elsa refuses to open the door because she has been taught to repress her emotions. “Do you wanna build a snowman? Ok, bye …”

  24. HeyKay says:

    Heartbreaking.

  25. Emily_C says:

    There are going to be excuses and explanations, but they will all be bullshit. This family is horrid. I don’t blame Will either here — 15 is not old enough to process this stuff alone. No age is old enough to process death alone, actually.

    I don’t get where Harry’s nanny was. Was she told to stay away? I would not put it past Charles.

  26. Mabs A'Mabbin says:

    I’ve decided to wait just a bit to fall into Spare. By reading bits here and there, it’s as though I need to wade in lol. This whole funeral business when H was 12 is extraordinarily abysmal. I couldn’t handle what was happening to me during such a time and I was…31? That poor boy, I want to hug him even more now.

  27. Molly says:

    I have a 12 year old son, and while he’s really grown up in some way, he’s still VERY much a little kid in so many others. I mean, they stuff aristo kids in little suits and ship them off at such a young age, but that certainly doesn’t make them mature adults.

    I’ll be curious if William has any reckoning once his own children turn 12 about how young Harry really was. (I know the answer…) William’s trauma is a whole other thing, but I hope he looks at George and has just an ounce of realization about how much Harry was failed by everyone.

    • Jaded says:

      I don’t think William has one iota of empathy, sympathy or remorse about how badly Harry was treated over the years. He’s bought into the “spare” mindset from the beginning, that Harry was an expendable dog’s body and punching bag — there to provide entertainment or be a scapegoat for the heir and his cadre of aristo friends. William is full of self-obsession, righteous indignation when he isn’t treated as some kind of god, and like any good narcissist worth his salt, will NEVER admit to any wrong-doing, in fact he’ll throw anyone under the bus to escape responsibility for his bad behaviour.

      • molly says:

        Sadly, you’re probably right.

        And maybe it won’t be when George is 12, but rather when George is 15 (William’s age) and Charlotte is 12. Or maybe when Louis is 12.

        So many children from trauma get a deluge of renewed emotions when they become parents and their own children reach that age. (“How could anyone abuse/neglect/abandon someone that small and helpless??”)

        I fear George will be raised with all the baggage and brokenness of The Heir, but I really, really hope William has a speck of empathy for Harry when he looks in the eyes of an actual 12 year old child he brought into this world and is supposed to love and protect.

  28. Emmlo says:

    Making them go to church that morning is so odd to me because by all accounts, QE’s faith was a source of deep comfort in her own life. Why not have a private service honoring Diana at Balmoral. Why not have a vicar (maybe one from London the boys knew better) flown to them to comfort them and talk about the hope of resurrection or whatever. It’s such an obvious move to me.

    Even so, it can’t replace the emotional and physical comfort of someone (ANYONE) saying “I know it must be awful. Whatever you’re feeling or not feeling is okay. Do you want a hug?”

    I read Paul Burrell’s book and he describes a moment at KP where the boys came to say private goodbyes to Diana before the funeral the next day. It never occurred to me that they only saw her coffin and never actually saw her body. Poor Harry and honestly poor William too. Neither of them deserved to go through 1/10th of that misery.

    • QuiteContrary says:

      Not only that, but Diana wasn’t mentioned by name at that service — not even a single prayer was offered up for her.

      I have had to put down “Spare” a couple of times because the treatment of Harry is just so hard to comprehend. Diana hugged Harry often — Harry says he’s now a hugger, too. He must have been longing for Charles — for anyone in that cold family — to give him a comforting hug.

      And for them to leave a grief-struck child alone for hours … they are just horrible people.

      • molly says:

        To me the real crime wasn’t just leaving him alone but starting the bagpipes at 9a.m. sharp the next morning and moving along like nothing happened.

        *Let’s get ready for church, your suit is all laid out, breakfast and music are downstairs as always, I’ll meet you in the car. La-dee-da, nothing special to talk about today!*

      • Jazz Hands says:

        @molly, Harry describes that there were no bagpipes played in the evening when the Queen passed away, out of respect for her. Where was that same respect for Diana and her sons? Terrible.

      • SadieMae says:

        I hadn’t thought about it this way before, but it’s especially awful that the one person in William and Harry’s life who apparently actually gave them any real affection was the person who had died. Suddenly they were thrust into terrible trauma and grief and, to compound that, the one person who they would want most to comfort them suddenly wasn’t there. Heartbreaking.

    • The Royals are Ghouls! says:

      The Queen has to emphasize that faith was so important to her because she literally wouldn’t have a job without the concept of “Divine Right.”

      Thinking they’ll act like Christians when it’s time to do so? Well, THAT’S magical thinking. 😉

  29. Misa says:

    Speaking of lack of empathy, and toxic silence: on the Guardian there’s a commentary on Harry’s appearance on the Late show, where the author states that this British silence might be toxic, but sometimes it’s the best way (Harry shouldn’t have been on the late show cause he ridiculed himself, according to her). They’re making it into a cultural war, Harry’s story is turning them defensive, even supposed anti monarchists.
    This makes him even braver, even stronger – and Diana too. Imagine having no hope of receiving empathy from not only your disfunctional family, but also literally no one else. Not the press of course, but also not the school institution, Crown employees, no one. Terrifying.
    The author I mentioned above also made fun of Harry smiling at people in the audience cheering for him. Well lady, even if smiling about it were a bad thing (which it isn’t): maybe he felt the love, for once, free love, not attached to British silence and English stoicism: and what a relief it must have been! How it would have helped 12 year old Harry to have someone cheer on him for being strong, for being brave!

    • Flower says:

      I agree it’s like half the UK are angry with Harry for being human and living on his terms.

      The proprietorship I keep seeing from the UK and in particular Royalists is unhinged. I’m a Brit so don’t understand it.

      I am just happy that he is free and able to tell his story and make enough money to pay for his family’s security for the next 20-30 years. Yes Harry has to sing a little for his supper but I am sure he would do it every time to keep them all safe.

    • Emily_C says:

      The “stiff upper lip” thing is toxic. Period. It is never the best way, or even an acceptable way. It’s all tied up in empire and moral injury in a way that’s probably best expressed through poetry.

    • Saucy&Sassy says:

      Misa, IMO the Colbert show was the best interview that Harry gave. I’m not alone in my thinking. That must alarm the bm because he said that the bm deliberately increased his risk factor by lying about what he said about Afghanistan. Then said that was the choice the bm made.

      I guess if I was someone writing the crap that’s written in the bm, it would make me find a way to trivialize that interview. Good luck with that.

  30. Old_Crone says:

    The most heartbreaking for me was that no one in his family ever hugged him again after his mother died

  31. AA says:

    I’m reading the book right now and I can’t believe how unfeeling these people are. He never hugged his grandmother? (The Queen.) He has never hugged his father? ???? what on earth? And to think in that giant family, no one thought to hang around the kids and make sure they were ok. Maybe they didn’t want to talk about, but at least be there and watch TV with them, play a game, BE THERE to make sure if they want to talk, there’s someone there. All of them just seem so bizarre to a normal 21st century person, so unfeeling. I can’t imagine Diana trying to vibe with these people – she was one giant emotion.

    • molly says:

      It’s interesting because so many of the RF Christmas photos show Charles being very affectionate with the boys. Both before and after Diana’s death. Maybe he just turned it on for the cameras, and maybe Harry focuses on the level of emotional neglect across the board, but I believe that Charles really did the best he could as a father with zero emotional skills or healthy relationship role models.

      Charles’ parents were terribly cold, his own childhood sounds miserable, he was a victim in the Diana mess too, and I’m sure he was lonely nearly all the time.

      I guess I wish he would have at least outsourced the love and affection piece, if he wasn’t equipped to do it himself. Charles at least had his Grandma. After Diana died, who the hell hugged those boys?

      • AA says:

        I agree that Charles did the best he could, from the sounds of it. He wasn’t equipped for emotions either. I think he really does love his kids but he’s also kind of self-centered, being raised to be the ‘heir.’ The whole thing is just so sad.

      • Blithe says:

        I think Charles did try to outsource the love and affection piece — with Tiggy, as a companion for William and Harry after he and Diana separated.

        As miserable as Charles has been as a parent, I, too, think that he did try. Sort of. Sometimes. I did wonder, though, at the choice of Eton for Harry (perhaps to keep the two boys together for mutual support) when a place like Gordonstoun — where Charles himself was so miserable— might have been a better fit for Harry.

        I’m not sure how you see Charles as being “a victim in the Diana mess too”, though. His marriage and his family with William and Harry was noxiously molded from the very beginning by his relationship with Camilla — and by Camilla herself — in ongoing, toxic ways. If Charles was “lonely” he had better options than the ones he avidly chose to pursue.

      • Saucy&Sassy says:

        molly, you are forgetting the Escort. She was there throughout his marriage. He did get sympathy and solace from her. One of the biggest mistakes in his life, IMO, is that he didn’t give his marriage to Di a chance. He should have tried to make the marriage work rather than having a “heir and spare” and I’m out of here attitude. The Escort was always a presence. Diana wanted to be loved and she loved Chuck when they married.

        Don’t ever forget that he wasn’t as alone as you have stated.

    • Claire says:

      Wait he said that he never hugged his grandmother or father !!!?????

  32. NMB says:

    I can have some empathy for Charles because he was raised by his incredibly cold parents, who were raised by their cold parents and back and back. We’ve all seen The Crown, read the tabloids – they’re all so messed up and repressed. So dysfunctional. I don’t approve of the coldness, and I certainly find it tragic, but it’s all learned behavior. Why do we think Harry inappropriately lashed out and yelled at Meg in the way he did? Learned behavior. The difference with Harry, though, is he has gotten therapy and is actively tying to change his ways and be better.

    • MoBiMom says:

      Generational trauma, as Harry said…. lord, go back and look at Prince Phillip’s childhood!

      • Tigerlily says:

        Mobimom Exactly. Pr Philip wasn’t even raised by his parents. His father took off to south of France (with a mistress) after his grandmother had his mom institutionalized when he was (I believe) under 10. One uncle (George) sort of took on guardianship but died young of cancer. He bounced between Grandmother (Victoria Milford Haven) at Kensington Palace & (another uncle) lord Mountbatten when not at boarding school. Sad childhood. And not a surprise that his parenting skills sucked.

  33. Flower says:

    Also came just to add that Diana died exactly two weeks before Harry was to turn 13.

    So essentially he was in mourning at a pivotal time / age of becoming a teenager.

    So much to unpack.

  34. AnneL says:

    My nephew was 12 when my sister died, around the same age as Harry. She had a chronic illness but it was still quite sudden and shocking. We had always thought it would be in a hospital after prolonged complications. She was the custodial parent. His father was very much in his life but he lived with my sister.

    It was definitely traumatic for him, and he is still dealing with it, I’m sure. He’s an incredible young man really. But he had family around him, hugging him, keeping an eye on him, making sure he knew he was safe. He had my parents, his other grandparents who lived closer to him, all of his aunts and uncles on both sides. Everyone stepped in to help fill the void.

    And more importantly, he was not left alone after the initial shock and was not shipped off to school right afterwards. He moved in with his father and spent loads of time with all of his relatives. He is almost like a son to my mother. He’s the top priority grandchild, which is totally understandable.

    These people as so screwed up.

  35. Puppy1 says:

    Apart from Harry, this entire family and their cronies are a bunch of sick twists!

  36. KC says:

    Interesting article from 1998 where the media admits there was a campaign to reinvent Camilla via the boys.

    https://www.theguardian.com/theguardian/1998/jul/10/fromthearchive

  37. A says:

    I know that people don’t have a lot of love for Charles in these parts, and quite rightly so, but it did strike me that Harry has a lot of empathy for his father anyway, which for me is a sign of how much he has matured. It’s easy and proper to be angry with one’s parents for their shortcomings, and how they’ve impacted you as a child. It’s much harder to get to a place of neutrality, where you’re able to say, yes, you are this sort of person, you have these shortcomings, bc you’re a human being. And while your shortcomings affected me deeply, you are still a human being, and I have empathy for that.

    For me, Harry has always struck precisely the right balance where he’s able to hold his father accountable for the ways he failed his children, but while still affording Charles the sort of grace that only the child of such a parent could. I relate to that, because I’ve had to do a lot of that myself, as I grow up and become more of an adult. It’s really frustrating to see Charles spin what is honestly the nicest, and most good faith criticism he will ever get in his life as an unfair attack on him and his person. It’s par for the course, but it’s still frustrating.

  38. Lionel says:

    In a book full of terrible behavior and gruesome revelations, that was absolutely the most gutting passage for me. Charles came in, told a 12 year old boy his mother was dead, patted him on the knee, and … left.

    I guess Charles had complicated feelings about maternal death, and (at the time) knew that when he hears the same awful news himself he gets to be king, yay! (?) So maybe he couldn’t comprehend what unadulterated grief feels like. I wonder if he was even a little bit jealous, seeing as his whole life was built around this morbid waiting out of his mother’s. Ugh, coming up with explanations just makes it more and more awful.

    • SomeChick says:

      I seriously doubt Charles felt much beyond relief.
      will no one rid me of this troublesome woman?!

  39. FeatherDuk says:

    I was a teenager working when I heard about Princess Diana dying. I recall my first thought being that the RF had her killed, my second thought was imagining Charles telling William and Harry in a cold hearted way and leaving them in their rooms as if nothing happened. It’s amazing how close my imagination was with regard to the second point. I still wonder if my gut was right on the first as well.

    • SomeChick says:

      I was at Burning Man, so my first thought was, this could be just a ridiculous rumor. (There was no cell coverage back then.) My second was the same as your first. And the evidence trickles in. And they’re trying to do it again.

  40. HeyKay says:

    The cold blooded, cold hearted, behavior to a young child is just heartbreaking.
    No one had the humanity to hug him? Hold him? Sit with him to keep him company?
    Charles didn’t think to have the boys together in a bedroom?
    Move them into his room?
    Send a Nanny in to their rooms?
    Call any of Dianas sisters, ask them to come?
    Call a Doctor, maybe have some light sedation for the shock?
    Charles had options here, the most obvious being hug your sons, hold them.
    That entire family could be a case study for future therapists.

    For me, this brings a lot of my pain after losing my Mom right back.
    My Dad was barely holding himself together in his grief, my siblings are much older than me, we all went into our own shell of grief and shock and denial. But we wept together, we called each other, forced ourselves to eat something together, told ourselves we had to keep it together for Dads sake. Grief, shock, numbness, are common and go on for years.

    All the PR talking about Harry being obsessed with Dianas death, telling him to get over it.
    Grief doesn’t just stop, for many of us the loss is life changing.

  41. AmelieOriginal says:

    I was only 9 when Diana died so while I remember the press onslaught and outpouring of grief after her death (I was in France when she died visiting family), the one other thing I remember was the media/public anger at the Queen for trying to ignore everything and have the whole thing go away. She didn’t want a huge public funeral for Diana from what I remember but the public demanded it.

    I didn’t really think about Harry and William though at the time but as I grew older, I always wondered what it had been like for them behind the scenes. I always thought “At least they have their dad still” though I questioned them walking behind her coffin for the funeral. It turns out the reality was so much worse behind the scenes, I would never have believed it if Harry had not written and included it in his book. My heart breaks for him and William that they received little to no emotional support. I also wonder how much support Harry got from Diana’s family. I get the impression they might be close because he thanked Diana’s family (notably Diana’s sisters) in the acknowledgements of the book at the end.

  42. Jess says:

    Full disclosure, my dad died when I was 6 years old. I was the only one with him when he had a heart attack. For years, I convinced myself he was a spy on a secret mission, with the FBI helping them catch bad guys. I dreamed up so many scenarios for why he wasn’t here. I wonder if this is something that a lot of kids do when they lose a parent?

  43. Annemarie says:

    All of what you said. Exactly.

  44. freddy says:

    I have a cousin who is a day younger than me and her sister is three years younger–when we were 12 their mother (my mom’s sister) died and their father who had divorced my aunt years earlier NEVER reached out to my cousins. I remember being so filled with rage and hate at their father that he couldn’t be bothered to reach out to his children and offer condolences. My mom and dad, our grandfather, and an array of aunts, uncles, and cousins were incredibly mindful—-so many hugs and kisses during the days, weeks, and months after my aunt’s funeral. My cousin and I are 54 and 51 now, and they say to this day that my parents and our extended family gave them more love and support than their father could have ever. The loss of a parent is crushing as an adult, to lose a parent as a child, I couldn’t imagine.

  45. Well Wisher says:

    Harry has been taking care of that little boy who did not know how to grieve, what to do with negative emotions.
    How to use them? What to share?

    It is part of the healing process, this ‘testimony’ is to let him (the 12 year-old) be heard and comforted in a unique mannert o him.

    He has removed the band-aid and aired the wound. To heal. To trust. To love.
    He was allowed to do it in a safe emotional space.
    I hope he continue to experience the peace and joy he has earned and truly deserve.

  46. Susie says:

    What breaks my heart is the fact that for 12 years he had an emotionally attune mother who was very very physically affectionate with him and the day she dies he’s left with a father who taps his knee and leaves him alone right after he hears she’s dead. Can you imagine being that loved and he seems to be a physically affectionate guy. He completely lost that until he found his wife and had kids. He said finally I have this love in my life and the people that made his mothers life miserable tried to take that away from not just him but also his son. It’s a very hurt me once shame on you and hurt me again and I will cut off all contact. That to me is the cruelest and most tragic aspect. They very clearly didn’t learn the lesson of Diana and in fact wanted to inflict that trauma on Harry again. That breaks my heart for him. My media reviews are acting like this book is supposed to be about tea and gossip when it is very very obviously about intense trauma just in a weird environment. I don’t think the book will get a fair shake for a few years when people stop trying to focus on the salacious aspects. And shame on the British press, his family, the courtiers and even the public. The man went thru an unimaginably tragic experience as a 12 yo literal days away from his 13th birthday basically due to the same institutions and people who tried to make him relive at the age his mother died. I get that he is rich and privileged but I truly believe the Brit’s owe us n so much. everyone said they would take care of those boys for Diana and they abdicated their responsibilities when he stopped being the jolly drunk play boy. Also I’m sad that William has obviously decided to play the Charles role to Harry’s diana but that man has also been thru trauma and wasn’t emotionally protected and he seems so deeply miserable and happy. Unfortunately the institution will never let him leave and now instead helping Harry break the generational curse he is essentially passing it down to the next Gen. The way they talk about Louis is horrifying when you consider how miserable all the spares have been for generations. The fact that Harry got out is a testement to his bravery but also his love for meghan and his kids and even his niece and nephews. Also since this is already an essay 1 sad but heartwarming things is how everybody was turning their nose up about H&M pda and physical affection when it’s very clear that harry very much needs that and meghan knows that and rather give harry that touch and take the heat from the media then stop. From the day his mom died he basically had none of something he so obviously needs and was sooooo deeply important to him until he got with meghan. I don’t want to make it seem like she is his emotional support prop (they are obv 2 people who were deeply lonely since childhood and found the affection and love they wanted in each other) but I would suspect she knows how important these things are to him and is will to take the eye rolling to make sure he gets it. And also she seems naturally physically affectionate. I hope they both find peace and happiness in their love

  47. Mag says:

    My husband died quite young, when my step-son was a young teen. My daughter and I spent a solid week consoling him, being there when he wanted to cry or talk, or to just simply not be alone. There is no way in hell that we’d have left him alone with his grief and shock. After the wake/funeral/burial week was over, everyone had to try to return to our ‘normal’ life of work and school. We made certain that his school was aware of the tragic loss of his Dad. We, the adults, had to set aside our own grief and be there for a young boy who wasn’t much older than Harry was when his mother died so tragically. Charles and all of the other adults who could have and should have been there for Harry failed miserably at being basic decent human beings. Their behavior was disgusting, neglectful and abusive.

  48. The Recluse says:

    Reading this I was reminded of part of Patton Oswalt’s show (on Netflix) called Annihilation. He discusses what he went through after his wife’s sudden death, how their daughter was in school (pre-school or 1st grade) and he called the Principal to talk to her about handling it. He said that the Principal was amazing and described how she told him to keep his daughter home from school the next day (Friday) and have a day out with her. She told him not to just dump the bad news on her as soon as she got home that day and then send her off to bed, but to wait till that next day while they were out together. She told him to “tell her in the sunshine”. Then they would have the rest of the day to deal with the immediate fallout together.
    That really stuck with me. It’s a shame someone didn’t give that advice to Charles and had him follow it.

    • Anna says:

      This is heartbreaking but also so good to hear two adults coming together to do what is best for a child. BRF has access to EVERTHING, help, counseling, you name it – whenever they need it. Yet, they choose to stay horrible and incompetent at the price of others, including their children.

      Harry’s story is heartbreaking, I just want to hug this young boy… in this family of unemployed assholes, nobody took the time to be with boys who just lost their mother and they even used them for PR at the worst time of their lives. Harry somehow turned his life around but Will is a lost cause… and now I fully believe Midds groomed him and cynically used his vulnerability. It’s not excusing his behavior, but now I see where it is coming from.

  49. GDubslady says:

    Charles left Harry alone bc he felt guilty for ordering Diana’s murder and he might betray himself to his children if he spent time with them. He didn’t want that additional guilt. The Queen and Phillip probably were hiding out too, fearful the truth would come out. The entire world knew Diana was murdered.
    Thy kept the heirs and spares with them as a bargaining chip and to keep people off the scent. This was the crime if the century and Charles got away with it.

  50. Emf999 says:

    I’m listening to the audio book. I am at the part where he’s in Botswana for the first time. I have to tell you that my heart is hurting listening to this. It’s so flipping sad how little emotional support he (and indeed Willie) received. Poor poor kids.

  51. Janet DR says:

    I have waiting all day to comment because this is so upsetting. I am a few years older than Diana would be and my son is a year younger than Harry. My husband left for another woman when he was 4 and his sister was 2. He married the next woman after that one and she was very much into running me down to everyone, sending hate mail to me (not in the mail, she would have my daughter hand It to me). They were really into mind games such as his refusing to have them wear their boots in the winter, then she would rant about how i was getting all the child support, so why didn’t they have boots?, Etc, etc.
    So you can see how much I related to Diana’s whole situation and always kept her children, and especially Harry in my heart. His story is heartbreaking . I hope the light he is putting on it will bring perfect healing for him and perhaps help the next generation as well. 💗

    • Hummingbird says:

      @JanetDR. I hear you. So similar to my situation. Same age as you, a daughter same age as William and 1 a year younger than Harry.
      My ex left for his mistress when the children were 8 and 12 and married another woman (E)after the mistress (M) dumped him. In the 7 years M was in my kids life she’d undermine me at every opportunity. She was very well off and I was broke. He stopped the maintenance for his own kids but took hers on holidays and for skiing lessons and pony trekking.
      The end result is I have 2 daughters who are emotionally damaged. I know I didn’t handle it all very well, and should have sought family counselling but it was a stigma in those days.
      My parents thought I should just suck it up.
      I feel such empathy for Harry and such anger towards Charles. He should have been there emotionally for both his sons.
      I screwed up many times but I always made sure my children knew they were loved.
      I also know how cathartic it is to write all your feelings down.

      • JanetDR says:

        @Hummingbird, the red flags that I didn’t see! I occasionally wonder if we would have been better off moving far, far away and he might not have expended the time and money to see them. And that would have been really hard for me but maybe better for the kids. My son doesn’t really talk about it and my daughter goes out of her way to include him on holidays, even though she knows what he is. He’s going to jerk them around for the rest of his life…..

  52. blunt talker says:

    the people loyal to Charles and the Queen-really hated Diana -especially after the divorce-I truly feel they were relieved that Diana died because that is one less obstacle in their plans for Charles and Camilla-if you ever find the picture of Charles around the age five or six-you can see a lonely and sad expression on his face and his mother just shook his hand or patted his head and you could tell he wanted more closeness than he was receiving-if you grow like this then the generational pain will continue with his own sons-especially the spare is considered expendable. I truly hope abd pray both sons do a better job raising their children-always let children feel the love whether its private or public.

    • Tessa says:

      Unfortunately it looks like George is being treated more special with the dynasty photos and all that.

  53. J says:

    Astounding that so many take everything harry wrote as gospel. Also amazing that so many bought the book and care enough to debate it. Its a family, stuff happens, people are flawed. Royals are good for tourism and charities, other than that who cares about their family dynamic. Harry needs funds and he found a way to make a decent amount to maintain his lifestyle.
    His family made mistakes, who’s family hasnt.

    • Saucy&Sassy says:

      J, well, I guess you told them. The brf is just a family–just like any other family. You might try selling them on that idea, because I doubt they would agree with you. Yes, I’m going to believe what Harry says. If any of the other members want to say something directly then I’ll listen to them. Of course, pigs will fly before that ever happens.

      Don’t pretend that this is a family like any other. I have friends who have been to England. Guess what? Not one of them mentioned the royal family once. They talked about all of the places and sites they saw. Tourism would do as well as it is now without the royal family. I will concede that weddings might be an exception, and possibly funerals. Other than that? As far as the brf itself? I think that’s a UK thing.