Tom Cruise acted as negotiator in SAG-AFTRA’s talks with AMPTP last month

Tom Cruise managed to complete the bulk of the promotion for Mission: Impossible: Dead Reckoning before SAG-AFTRA called the strike. Now, given Tom’s history, I assume there were other cities on his promotional tour and more interviews and appearances to be made. But he and the MI cast got a lot of it done and it worked out to a $235 million five-day opening week/end. Which is considered a disappointment, given how much money was spent making these fakakta films. In any case, Tom is prohibited from doing any more promotion now that SAG is on strike. Turns out, Tom was using his position to speak to AMPTP about coming to the table on many of SAG-AFTRA’s concerns one month ago. Not only that, but Tom spoke to SAG leadership about the possibility of allowing him to still promote his film during the strike.

How important is the AI issue to members of SAG-AFTRA? Important enough that Tom Cruise Zoomed into a June negotiating session to urge the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers to hear out the guild’s concerns on the issue, The Hollywood Reporter has learned. That wasn’t the Mission: Impossible star’s sole concern. He also wanted to urge the AMPTP to support the guild’s position on stunt performers.

SAG-AFTRA sometimes calls in performers during negotiating sessions to discuss issues in which they have expertise. Any member can request to address a negotiation session and the guild can evaluate the value of having them participate. Apparently, the guild concluded that Cruise’s point of view was worthy. (It’s understood that no other star of his caliber participated in the negotiations in this capacity.)

SAG-AFTRA had a handful of proposals on the table concerning stunt professionals, including stunt coordinators and stunt performers, which the 160,000-strong union represents. The union also sought to institute more guardrails on the use of generative AI in entertainment in its 2023 talks with studios and streamers, focusing on ensuring that performers give consent and are appropriately compensated when their performances are ingested into the technology.

Of course, despite Cruise’s participation in the talks, after around five weeks of negotiation the performers’ union and the AMPTP failed to come to a deal by 11:59 p.m. on Wednesday, July 12, when the union’s film and television contracts package expired. Starting July 14, performers began picketing at studio lots and corporate headquarters in New York and Los Angeles and withholding their work, which subsequently has shut down or delayed productions including Mission: Impossible 8.

In addition to lobbying studios and streamers on behalf of SAG-AFTRA, Cruise is said to have asked the union to consider allowing actors to promote films during a strike given the fragile state of movie theaters, reminding his union that promotion matters to actors, too. It felt “uncomfortable,” says a source who was present.

[From THR]

It’s actually very cool and pro-worker that Tom Cruise used his position to act as a middleman negotiator between SAG-AFTRA and the AMPTP. He was basically acting as an ambassador from the actors’ union, and it’s kind of amazing that he was able to speak with depth about the AI issue and the stunt performers, because negotiating that stuff gets complicated really fast. I also don’t have a problem with Cruise asking SAG to reconsider their stance on promotional tours. We have no idea if he actually believed he would get a reversal on that decision, but it never hurts to ask and Tom made the ask and he was turned down. I’m sure SAG leadership told him the same thing striking union workers tell everyone: it’s supposed to be disruptive. It’s supposed to hurt. That’s what will get AMPTP to the table and willing to negotiate in good faith.

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, Cover Images.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

6 Responses to “Tom Cruise acted as negotiator in SAG-AFTRA’s talks with AMPTP last month”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. K says:

    I bet there alot of running around the room and fist pounding.

    • ME says:

      LOL ! I can imagine him yelling the same way he did in that leaked tape where he scorned someone on set for not following Covid protocols (which of course people should be following all protocols for safety)…but I’ll never forget the way he yelled and how loud his voice got. It’s like dude, you could have asked the person nicely and not go off like that. He might be short-tempered.

  2. HeyKay says:

    When he lost his temper and yelled at the break in C19 protocol, was one of the only times I thought of him as a human being.
    Multi-million dollar production in which he was Star and Producer. I don’t think he has a short temper. He was stressed and yelled. IRL, those of us immune compromised were terrified during C19. I still back him for “losing it”

    Tom Cruise carries a lot of weight in HW. Good for him in at least trying to avoid a strike.

    The studios really seem hell bent on starving out both Unions.
    The wealthier members need to come together and financially support the strikers on the lower end of the pay scale.

  3. Tree says:

    Tom cruise was watching TV and “born on the fourth of july” was playing. He said it was so badly cut and the commercial was in weird places that it took away from the movie. He actually lobbied about it and won. Now there is a clause where network TV can only cut so much of a movie. There was a clause about commercials but the networks worked around that pretty fast.

  4. Arpeggi says:

    I’m not sure I’m cool with his request to keep promoting movies during the strike: that’s not to help theatres or cinema or whatever, it’s probably just because he is listed as a producer and he’s certainly making huge profits if the movie does well in the theatres. It’s not altruistic and most Guild members, including his colleagues on the movie, wouldn’t make those same benefits

  5. Visa Diva says:

    I’ll side eyehis request to keep promoting his film but will applaud Tom for advocating for stunt performers. He’s been a longtime supporter of their craft