Duchess Meghan reportedly saw ‘Barbie’ with some girlfriends last week!

The Duchess of Sussex celebrated her birthday on August 4 (Friday). Two nights before her birthday, Prince Harry took her out to dinner in Montecito. They went to an Italian restaurant called Tre Lune. I looked up the menu as soon as the photos came out on Friday. Hilariously, the Daily Mail did the same thing, and they ran a stand-alone story all about the restaurant, who owns it, the wine selection, the “lavish brunches, the over-$30 main course menu, everything. I love how every salty commentator is in lock-step about how unimportant and insignificant the Sussexes are, meanwhile they pore over every single little thing the Sussexes do, where they go, who they see, who they speak to and what they eat. Speaking of, Page Six ran an exclusive about another thing Meghan did during her birthday week: she went to see Barbie with some girlfriends.

She’s Meghan Markle… he’s just Ken. The Duchess of Sussex celebrated her 42nd birthday early by going to see the “Barbie” movie with pal Portia De Rossi and a couple of other girlfriends, Page Six is told. The group watched the Margot Robbie-led feminist hit at a Santa Barbara theater earlier this week, sources say, while Prince Harry remained home at their $14 million Montecito, Calif., estate.

The “Suits” alum kept the festivities going by joining friends at the posh San Ysidro Ranch hotel in Santa Barbara Monday night. We hear the controversial royal posed for photos and made videos with a bachelorette group that was celebrating at the hotel. One onlooker tells us, “Meghan went over to wish the bride good luck.”

While Harry, 38, stayed behind while his wife had fun with her friends at the start of the week, he made sure they still celebrated her special day. On Wednesday, the Sussexes were spotted grabbing dinner at celebrity hot spot Tre Lune in Montecito.

As for the couple’s plans for her actual birthday, which falls on Friday, we hear Markle and Harry will spend the day at home with their two children, Prince Archie, 4, and Princess Lilibet, 2. An insider tells us the prince is “purposely staying behind to be with Meghan,” as he is slated to appear at the ISPS Sports Values Summit-Special Edition in Tokyo next Wednesday.

After arriving in Japan, Harry will head to Singapore with Argentinian actor Nacho Figueras, where they’ll play in the 2023 Sentebale ISPS Handa Polo Cup at the Singapore Polo Club on Saturday. It is unclear if the former actress plans to join her husband in Asia, but the pair are confirmed to attend the Invictus Games together in Düsseldorf, Germany, in September.

[From Page Six]

If this is true and Meg went to see Barbie with her girlfriends, I think that’s nice? Harry would have enjoyed the movie too, but I understand why Meghan wanted to see it with her girls. It’s a great movie! I bet she enjoyed it! It basically sounds like Meghan and Harry spent Meghan’s “birthday week” like they spend most weeks: in and around Montecito, being quiet, going to the movies, going out to dinner. This Barbie has a simple beach-community life.

Predictably, none of the royal-affiliated social media accounts wished Meghan a happy birthday. Honestly, not surprising? The real surprise was that Clarence House and Kensington Palace posted birthday messages to Meghan last year. New king, new social media strategy – no more birthday wishes for the Sussexes, no more being nice to the king’s son, daughter-in-law or grandchildren. All of those same royal accounts also failed to wish Archie and Lili a happy birthday this year. Imagine being nasty like that to children.

Photos courtesy of Netflix.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

84 Responses to “Duchess Meghan reportedly saw ‘Barbie’ with some girlfriends last week!”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Tessa says:

    The article talks about harry staying home in mansion. Meghan is criticized for going to the movies with friends in articles like these. These writers can’t help themselves

    • HeyJude says:

      There will be no less than 72 articles about the heinous offense of Meghan seeing the Barbie movie in the Daily Mail alone because they can’t help themselves.

      • Renae says:

        …and none of it is worth even ONE article! Too bad the daily fail doesn’t seem to notice.
        Here’s the news(?) Calif. woman goes to movie with friends. Husband babysits kids.
        How exciting was that? Guess I won’t get hired at the Fail.

    • Agreatreckonng says:

      LOL @Tessa. Right. Where’s the outrage that Portia left Ellen behind in their $25 million? (I have no idea what their home value is and don’t need to know)? It’s very cruel of Portia to leave Ellen behind to care for their pets! A woman does things without her husband. SHOCKING.

      A Barbie movie birthday celebration sounds like a lot of fun. Page Six has no clue. Murdoch owned and other British Media owned/affiliates are bullsh*t. The sad thing is that you can’t even use them for compost manure. Their toxicity numbers are too high.

    • Lux says:

      My husband also—wait for it—stayed home with my two kids while I watched Barbie with girlfriends! Oh man, is my marriage in trouble?

      Just occurred to me: Khate embodies all the criticism towards Stereotypical Barbie (without the girlfriends), while Meghan represents all that she had become. No one loves the patriarchy like the Royal Family does.

      • JJ says:

        That newspaper is just trying to take digs wherever they can. They brought up a couple of times that Harry stayed at home while Meghan went to see a movie with her friends as though a married woman shouldn’t be going out without her husband. They are just trying to say “maybe all is not well with the Sussexes’ marriage” without saying those words. As if happily married women can’t go out with their friends! smh. Good call on Kate being 50s Barbie and Meghan being current Barbie.

  2. Tessa says:

    She is not a controversial royal. All the usual negative comments

    • Nic919 says:

      It is despicable how they use adjectives like that for a woman who dared speak up. Meanwhile Andrew still exists.

      • Tessa says:

        And Andrew rarely gets epithet like controversial.andrew gets free passes
        Charles second marriage is controversial.Meghan did nothing wrong.

    • The Old Chick says:

      And on a story about Cowmilla caring for abused women I called her out with receipts and my account gets banned. Nothing bad, just the truth. But true abusers never get banned

    • Christine says:

      Every single time the Wails disappear for months on end, England descends into…this. Hey, how about you go look for your royals that are fleecing the taxpayers? I’ll bet one of them went to a movie, and maybe even for a $30 entree, since they were last seen at the beginning of July.

      Seriously, why are these people not chasing down the Wails for scintillating gossip about movies and dinner?

  3. Geegee says:

    Slow news day in the uk.

  4. TheWigletOfWails says:

    Thank heavens the BaRF didn’t wish her a happy birthday. Spare us the fakeness and Meghan the abuse.

    • Yvette says:

      @TheWigletOfWalis … It’s now very plain to see that Queen Elizabeth II had love for Harry, Meghan, and their children. I’m sure many in England are seeing it as well. All that crud about the Royal Family welcoming Meghan with open arms.

      It was probably only Queen Elizabeth, Philip (of all people!, because Meghan and Harry always speak of him as if he was kind to them), and Eugenie … and perhaps Fergie (I’m curious about who she purchased that home in Mayfair for, wink wink) who showed them true kindness. A few of the other cousins show ‘forced’ politeness (yes, I’m looking at you Beatrice and Zara).

      • blue says:

        Agree^ Beatrice was genuinely fond of Harry, I believe, but she sure didn’t welcome Meghan with open arms & has shown her no support, unlike Eugenie. Bea really sucks up to Willy & won’t show any support for Harry now. She wants to elevate herself within the BRF, along with her semi-shady spouse. I still think he would never have married her if she weren’t a princess.

  5. Heather Bailey says:

    They BM pour over H&M’s every move, every detail of their life in America because they make them more $$ than the RF. People are more interested in them than the RF. This is why the RF abused them, planted disgusting stories about them and ran them off.

    They’ve not lived in Britain in almost 4 years, but they BM is still making $$$ off them all day, everyday. I’m so proud of Harry for leaving to protect his family. He simply didn’t want history to repeat itself. He placed his family’s safety and mental well being above anything else. I applaud him. I also applaud him for chipping away at the BM in court. He’s going to be the one to burn it all down.

    I used to think it was crazy to think the RF or British government could have worked in tandem to ‘take care’ of the problem that was Diana, but I do wonder sometimes, particularly after that scary chase of H&M and Doria in NYC. Like, what’s come of that?

    • Brit says:

      The BM is making money off them but it’s not the same with them being in America. Before they left, the press there had exclusives and leaks nearly every week. The photographers had pictures from engagements. Why do you think they panicked when she didn’t go to the coronation? The make nothing off their children because they’re so far away. The newspapers are losing money, lawsuits and have furloughed workers. Spare and the Documentary also did damage.

      • Chaine says:

        Yeah I think the Fail is desperate for content. They keep posting filler fluff articles like “where the royals went to school” and “royal wedding dresses over the years” because there is no real royal news or gossip that they can report on.

      • Amy Bee says:

        @Brit: You’re so right. The fact that the press is jumping from one made up story to another also shows how desperate they are to make money off of Harry and Meghan. Nothing sticks anymore.

  6. Eurydice says:

    Yes, the real surprise will be the day the RF doesn’t suck.

    I’m sure Meghan had a great time with all the friends she’s not supposed to have.

    And I have to laugh at the pearl-clutching over $30+ main courses. That menu wasn’t much different from the casual restaurants we have in Boston. Since COVID and inflation, prices have increased dramatically – even a burger is $20-$25.

    • Ripley says:

      Tre Luna is amazing (or it was when I lived there over a decade ago). Didn’t look at the menu prices, but I would have thought main courses over $40 from where they were when I would go and compared to the rest of the country. The lovely thing about most of the restaurants in Santa Barbara is that they source most (if not all) of their food locally.

      And, if this account is true, I love this birthday weekend for her. Dinner at Tre Luna, Barbie and girl-time with friends at San Ysidro Ranch, followed by family time. Perfection. (I’m almost two years older than her and am going to ask the same when my birthday comes around — especially a night in a hotel where I get to sleep in.)

      • Eurydice says:

        Sure, when I say “casual,” I mean upscale, but not fine dining. And, although I can’t compare the quality, we have many good Italian restaurants with similar menus. My only point is that a $30+ entrée is not an “OMG, look how rich and entitled they are” kind of thing – that’s pretty much what you’d pay for pasta with clam sauce.

        Love the idea of a night in a hotel…sleep in, order room service…

      • Ripley says:

        @Eurydice, I completely get what you meant and agree. I probably wasn’t clear with my agreement (hadn’t had my coffee yet!).

    • AnneL says:

      Seriously. Over $30 is par for the course (sorry) in any nice restaurant these days. Not the most upscale or Michelin star rated or glitzy, just nice. Everything has gotten more pricy. Cocktails are $20 in a lot of places now. It’s crazy.

      • Slush says:

        This. Anywhere, in CA especially, that’s even sort of upscale will be over $30 an entree. It was such a weird thing to mention.

      • Genevieve says:

        I agree those prices seem completely reasonable to me, as well (especially considering it was a special night!). I can only assume the DM expects them to be subsisting on gruel and the occasional scraps of garbage.

      • Pabena6 says:

        They have to mention the $30 entree to rub it in the noses of Brits who can’t afford to feed their children now (not, I’m sure, that restaurant prices are vastly different in England). It’s like mentioning the frigging 82 bathrooms all the time — see what they’ve got that you don’t?! How entitled and awful they are?! It’s just another way to try to drum up hostility from the public.

  7. B says:

    I’m so happy Meghan got her life back.

    Lol the press won’t say boo about the Wales or current monarchs living in separate houses but will always imply something is wrong if the Sussexes do anything separately. How many times did they write Harry was “left behind” because Meghan had a girls night?!

    Also they wrote “It is unclear if the former actress plans to join her husband in Asia” Seems shorter to just say “Meghan” or “still unclear if his wife plans to join him in Asia” . Lol but I guess that last one still burns 😂 .

    • Bee says:

      They get paid by the word. “Meghan” and “his wife” don’t earn as much as “the former actress” and “join him” doesn’t make as much money as saying “join her husband.” Also they can twist it more. But make no mistake: they get paid by the word at the Fail.

      There’s an article from a former Fail writer that details this, along with what a hellhole it is.

      • kirk says:

        Bee – that would be an interesting read from former Fail writer. Do you recall the title or where it appeared?

  8. How do they know that she went to the movies? There were no pictures and they have no sources. If she did hope she had a great time. I noticed they got the price of their home in the article. Land of make believe just can’t help themselves.

    • Brit says:

      They will always feel a way about that house because it wasn’t supposed to happen. They were supposed to go back to the royals begging and pleading for forgiveness. Depending on William and Charles and humbled. I remember when that news came out, they were shocked. I remember when that Arthur Edwards fool was on one of them morning shows and he was practically crying. Montecito is better than Windsor and it makes them bitter.

      • Debbie says:

        Well, in that case, here’s to hoping that they keep crying about the Sussexes’ “mansion in Montecito” with every unnecessary article. The only thing is I wish I knew how many bathrooms it had. I just don’t think I’ll be able to sleep without knowing. Ridiculous.

    • Jaded says:

      Yes but what about the eleventy-seven bathrooms??? They forgot to mention that!

    • Mary Pester says:

      @susanCollins, I don’t stay awake long enough to flip through all the television channels at the moment Susan, but OMG Camilla Tominey has a bloody talk show /interview show on GB news!! Coupled with Wooton, it shows how low some of the UK networks have sunk!!

  9. Talie says:

    It is amazing how they have twisted themselves in knots over this “working royal” rule which makes no sense. It made for a busted and depressed balcony shot with a few of them staggering about at the coronation, as opposed to the Queen’s robust images of family when she reigned.

  10. Brit says:

    I won’t be surprised when the tabloids start pushing for a reunion because at this point, they benefit financially from all this drama but the longer Harry and Meghan stay away and continue to live their lives, the more angrier and panicked they become. They have no more leaks and exclusives besides grainy paparazzi pictures. They make themselves look stupid with all this manufactured nonsense and they have no engagement from their golden geese. They have no understanding of Americans and seem to think they can manifest their dreams on us here and it shows their hubris and ego. This is not the 80’s and the tabloids don’t make or break anyone. They’re just nuisances.

  11. Mary Pester says:

    My comments on this article! Chef’s 😘for pointing out in their rag, that the restraunt charges LESS for a meal that a lot of the ones in the UK, it also charges less than the public subsidised one in the houses of Parliament!! Then, if Megan did go to watch Barbie, it’s because she wanted to see how khates new career was going🤣🤣, especially after the pink with pearl belt trouser suit!! And why are they saying she went out with friends, because according to the rags, she doesn’t have any. They must be terrible shots, because every other day they get their own foot

    • Tessa says:

      Dining out costs have gone up. And the prices quoted in the article are certainly not exorbitant. The really expensive places can charge in the thousands. I too had thoughts of keen dressing like Barbie. If she has gone to a premiere keen would have worn a glittery pink gown with feathered boa.

  12. Nanea says:

    The “controversial royal”.

    Right. The controversy being Meghan is kind, successful, intelligent, beautiful, honest.

    Unlike the Workshy Welfare Windsor-Wailses, who are indisputably corrupt, tonedeaf, elitist, xenophobic, misogynoir racists, who are vacuous, thick and ignorant.

    Good thing Meghan was out and about with friends without being caught by paps – if true. At least she has (longtime) friends, unlike the Princess of Tights&Tiaras.

    • Kingston says:

      By “controversial royal” they mean:…..

      “……the royal who refused to take our abuse; the royal who refused to “remain schtum” about the effects of our abuse on her mental health; the royal who blew the lid off the smoke-and-mirrors hypocrisy that keeps the british royal mafia institution alive; the royal who still has black blood and is still married to the better prince and caused 2 royal children with black blood to be in the Line of Succession of the 1000-year white british royal mafia institution.”

      For these and many more real and made-up reasons, Meghan will forever be the “controversial royal.”

      Oh……also this: she’s the “controversial royal” because, unlike Pedo-Andy (and other royals who hv run afoul of our rules – like Sofiesta who called Betty a cow and called her own husband a f*ggot; and the unrepentant Nazi who wore a Blackamore brooch to Meghan’s first family lunch with the royal mafia institution) Meghan has refused to ingratiate herself to the british royal mafia institution and refused to play by the rules that the murdoch-mafia shidtmedia hv crafted for all the royals to live by i:e when we drag you in our pages and on teevee and on SM, you must shut up and take it so that we can write stories that say: ‘you hvnt trashed your family;’ which gives the subject sheep their talking points to regurgitate on SM whenever we refer to you as the “controversial royal.”

  13. Nic919 says:

    It’s amazing how they write all these stories about someone who left three years ago but the taxpayer supported ones can just hide away doing nothing for weeks. (Charles has done events in Scotland but the two in waiting have fallen off the map since Wimbledon. – burger video was filmed earlier)

    • Brit says:

      I think the media partly does it because it still causes tension in the family, which in turn, keeps the “feud” going. They know the royals are boring and they won’t admit it but they show with their actions. I can see why William is bitter because even his own media pals barely cover him. The family used Harry and Meghan as scapegoats and distractions but get mad because they dominate. That’s how stupid they are. The media and family have become parasitically dependent on the Sussexes.

      • Christine says:

        This really benefits the royals on Salty Isle, because these morons are providing cover for the slimmed-down modern monarchy to do absolutely fucking nothing. When is England going to notice and care?

        But sure, Meghan is the problem.

  14. Eliora says:

    Meghan is only “controversial” in the minds of losers. As shown by all the recent influx of support that she is receiving, most people find her inoffensive and undeserving of the hate that she receives from a predominantly white conservative leaning group of hate filled detractors.

    Sounds like Meghan is living her life, doing normal things and staying unbothered. Good for her.

  15. Sunday says:

    So she took pics with an entire bachelorette party and nobody has posted them on social media anywhere? This whole thing just sounds like fanfic.

  16. Amy Bee says:

    I’m glad the Royal Family ignored Meghan’s birthday. Acknowledging it was always disingenuous and hypocritical to me. I’m just happy Meghan and Harry are able to enjoy their life the way that they want to.

  17. Becks1 says:

    *clutches pearls* not 30 dollars an entree!!!!!!!! How dare Meghan enjoy a restaurant with…..reasonably priced entrees?

    Look I know 30/entree isn’t cheap, but on the scale of good restaurants, it’s not extreme either. We have restaurants in my semi-rural area that have entrees in that range and they are not as good as Tre Lune looks, lol. When I looked at the menu, the only thing that struck me as absurd was the 42 dollar “Ellen salad” and then I saw it had shrimp, scallops and salmon.

    So basically she went to eat at a nice Montecito restaurant and had a nice meal. Good for her.

    The DM knows nothing about her seeing Barbie but it wouldn’t surprise me if she did go see it with friends. Because she has friends. Unlike others……

    • Nic919 says:

      Maybe I am just fancy like a royal too, but $30 for a main course is not considered expensive in Toronto for most non franchise restaurants.

    • The Old Chick says:

      In basic, run of the mill pubs in Australia a steak, not a rib eye, eye fillet or anything, a basic rump /sirloin is 30-35. They sometimes have specials days but we’re talking the most basic place! That’s why I don’t eat our, can’t afford it. For a restaurant like that prices seem reasonable

    • Jaded says:

      Mr. Jaded and I rarely eat out because a decent restaurant meal here in Victoria will set you back easily $100 — anything cheaper and your meal would be blah. We’d rather save the money and, because I’m a good cook, I can easily replicate a recipe at home. In my travels to England I was astonished at the ridiculously high cost of eating out so I think it’s hypocritical of the gutter press to bitch about a $30 entrée. Man they are really scraping the bottom of the barrel aren’t they.

    • Lucky Charm says:

      I just did the conversion, and $30 is £23.53. That doesn’t seem too extravagant to me. And the taxpayers aren’t paying for her meal!

    • Gennessee says:

      $30 for an entree at a nice casual/upscale restaurant is not bad. At. All.

      I ordered a double whopper with cheese, a large drink and fries on Saturday and that little order came out to just under $18. In a West Los Angeles Burger King. A fast food joint.

  18. Maxine Branch says:

    The sheer desperation for Sussex information is really telling as well as the focus on America instead of reporting how a once thriving economy in Britain has been flushed down the toilet. Page Six is the equivalent to People Magazine nothing but supposition and nonsense. Harry and Meghan are living their best lives in California and the gutter rags are besides themselves. Meghan has gone back to what she always had a life well lived surrounded by people who she loves and love her. Harry now has the life he craved for himself and his now children. The UK is left with leftovers.

    • Jan says:

      I disagree, page six is part of the New York post newspaper, a Murdock tabloid.
      People Magazine usually writes what PR send them, they’re getting more tabloidy now, but still not as bad as page 6.

      • T says:

        Page 6 is known for daily articles criticizing harry and Meghan. People has the flowery articles about kate and William which is one reason I stopped buying it.

      • Maxine Branch says:

        I seriously doubt the Sussexes PR has been sending them the nonsense they have been spewing. Also, I am aware of the editor being a royalist.

  19. Nerd says:

    I don’t know if Meghan went to see the Barbie movie or not. I do know that PageSix isn’t a credible source for if she did. How do you write an article claiming she went to two places on Monday night with Portia and other friends, yet don’t have any photos of either location and outing? It was supposedly, according to an “insider”, part of a birthday week celebration that started on Monday, yet there was no mention or attached photos included in the story about her dinner date with Harry that happened Thursday or her actual birthday on Friday? This insider supposedly knew of these outings, what Harry was doing and what their plans were on her actual birthday, but still PageSix doesn’t have photos and thought a husband spending his wife’s Friday birthday with her instead of flying to Tokyo for an event that’s five days later was him “staying on purpose” for her. Rolling eyes at this point of the article. Then this same insider wasn’t sure if Meghan was going to attend either event but knows that “actor” Nacho would. Rolling eyes even more because they are obviously oblivious to who Nacho is or what anyone is confirmed to be doing. It’s just an article of assumptions.

    • Jan says:

      It was in the statement put out by Sentebale, that Harry and Nacho would be stopping in Japan to attend a sporting conference sponsored by one of the sponsors of the Polo match.

      • Nerd says:

        Yes, I know that Nacho and Harry will be attending both events. My point was them referring to Nacho as an “actor” yet claiming to have an insider who apparently knows everything happening inside their household but doesn’t know that Nacho isn’t an actor or whether or not Meghan will be attending. The whole point is they obviously don’t know anything and they are only making assumptions based on the little information we all know.

      • Jan says:

        They like to downplay Harry’ and Meghan’s friends.
        One of the most famous polo players Worldwide, well he did Ralph Lauren commercials.

      • Jaded says:

        @Nerd — IKR? He’s not an actor, he’s a world famous polo player (he’s called the David Beckham of polo) and a model. Jeezuz Page Six and the Fail, do some fact checking before you print such garbage.

      • Christine says:

        Exactly, Jan. If this was William, Nacho would be a “dear, long-time friend”, an inner circle of trust would be mentioned, or, at the very least, they would mention that Nacho is an elite athlete. It’s Harry, so the man who has obviously come to mean more to Harry than his blood brother is just an actor.

        Hapless Harry, tripping down the Hollywood path, with Meghan pulling his leash. *shrug*

        I hate these people.

  20. Jan says:

    Now they’re admitting the dinner was Wednesday night, so many people called out that lie, when the Dailyfail claimed it was Thursday night, because they posted the pictures at 6:30 PM California time.
    Meghan received birthday wishes from many people, so I don’t think she will miss wishes from the backstabbing Windsors.

  21. manda says:

    I love that striped dress! Seems awkward to walk in. I wish I liked the way maxis looked on me

    • Libra says:

      Only a supremely confident ( and slender) woman could pull off a dress like this. She looks great.

  22. Alice says:

    I love that it’s breaking news that a Xennienal woman went to Barbie with her girlfriends…exactly like most women in our age group did.

  23. Jais says:

    It’d be very cool if Meghan went to see Barbie with some friends. That said, this could easily be made up.

    • Debbie says:

      Full disclosure: I’m not now, and have never been, into Barbies but I do like the idea of the BM having people in dark theaters wearing night vision goggles with infrared illumination, on the off chance that Meghan and her friends would be in the audience. Something about that image just tickles me.

  24. Sara says:

    Grown woman sees movie with friends on her bday–news@11

  25. Vanessa says:

    The British media is just obsessed with Meghan they called her irrelevant yet their paying top dollar for exclusive pictures of her . Meghan is so irrelevant yet the media in England is constantly talking about her writing about her Follow her move . Meghan lives rent free in the British media mind its Ridiculously

  26. QuiteContrary says:

    Let’s face it: To the Murdoch media, “controversial duchess” first and foremost means Black.

    I await the British tabloid analysis of Meghan endorsing the woke ‘Barbie’ movie and how Kate is the superior royal because she prefers Tom Cruise movies to woke feminist films examining the patriarchy.

  27. ThatsNotOkay says:

    You all might not like the messenger, but I sure do like the message. Jerry Seinfeld, nearly three decades ago, said that people who read tabloids deserve to believe them. I’m fully in that camp.

  28. Saucy&Sassy says:

    If there are not photos, I don’t believe it. Having said that, the first thing I thought of when I read this is how disappointed the bm must be that Meghan was with girlfriends watching a movie. Won’t goes to clubs to drink and dance. KHate is either at home or at Ma’s. We’e yet to hear that KHate is anywhere with friends. We’ve seen Meghan IN PHOTOS with her friends. And a whole lot more than once.

    The real story here is that the two Wails don’t spend time together. That’s it.

  29. Sarah says:

    I believe original source is duex moi. They posted almost the exact same verbiage from someone who “sat behind Meghan”. Take that how you will.

  30. Flying fish says:

    I hope Meghan enjoyed all of her Birthday celebrations.

  31. Visa Diva says:

    Put another way “Woman see ‘Barbie’ with friends.” That’s some groundbreaking journalism.

  32. Pajalakenora says:

    I looked up the Tre Luna website, and it’s cover photo features a pizza. I’m surprised the Fail didn’t go with “The Sussexes are going broke so Harry took Meghan out for pizza.” Pathetic!

  33. Robin Samuels says:

    Since the divorce stories don’t seem realistic for the happily smiling Sussexes, the media attempts to pretend it was never a story. Since when were Ellen’s wife and Meghan such great friends? They mentioned her name, hoping to get a rebuttal so they could write an article stating Meghan and Ellen are no longer friends. The evil that paper does for the sake of a story. I know a few folks who are members of SAG, and they frequently receive advance copies of new releases to view for a limited period. I can’t imagine Meghan, a significant target of hate sitting in a movie theater without security. Celebrities, VIPs, etc., attend special screenings. I don’t imagine them attending regular filming, and NO ONE filmed her. Most mansions have a theater room, and I think there’s one in the Sussex abode. So I’m placing this one in a folder labeled Made Up Stories.
    The original announcement states that Harry and Nacho will travel to Japan to attend a youth summit and then to Singapore for the fundraising event. The magazine writers follow certain social media accounts where they gather information to create stories. The problem is many of the stories still need to be completed. According to the IG announcement, Meghan will participate in the closing ceremony, so perhaps, like last year, she may not attend all eight days. Harry’s birthday is on the 15th; she’ll be there for that. I imagine a spectacular evening.
    So Murdoch and his minions continue to persuade their readers that the Sussex are irrelevant, America is sick of them, etc. Meghan received birthday greetings from charitable organizations, news outlets, and fashion houses worldwide. A greeting from CH or KP is not only not anticipated but also optional because it lacks sincerity. In addition, the criticism and laughter across every platform would be loud.
    British media needs to accept the relationship is severed. Creating fake Harry and Meghan stories will not erase the Dan Wootton fiasco, which is not going away even though I know the RF wish it would.

  34. Happy Birthday my Queen

  35. AC says:

    A typical chain restaurant here in California can cost about $30-40 per entree esp for seafood or steak. I know many other restaurants in West Hollywood where the entree can cost over $100. But DM, shouldn’t your readers be happy that they’re not paying for HM meals . But hey you’re paying for WK and CC summer vacations 🤣 – you guys must be so proud lol!