‘Suits’ writers confirm: the streamers are screwing us out of residuals

One of the biggest hits of the year is a TV show which ran on basic cable from 2011 through 2019. Suits enjoyed lowkey popularity during its original run, but the show has become massively popular now that it’s streaming on Peacock, Amazon Prime and Netflix. The series has over three billion minutes viewed in streaming, and it’s one of Netflix’s most-watched shows this year. As I said in previous coverage, everyone who worked on Suits is getting ripped off by this steaming success. This is a huge part of why the WGA and SAG-AFTRA unions are striking: because even with billions of streams, the writers and actors are only being paid pennies in residuals. While the Suits actors haven’t publicized what they’ve received in residuals, a few writers from the series are speaking about how little they’re being paid in residuals.

Since moving from Prime Video to Netflix on June 17, Suits viewership has skyrocketed. The series holds a steady spot in Netflix’s weekly Top 10 chart, and from July 3 to July 9 Nielsen reported it garnered a whopping 3.7 billion viewing minutes on Peacock and Netflix combined. In doing so, the show set a new record as “streaming’s most viewed acquired title for a single week,” smashing the one set one week prior — by Suits. But as the show becomes a blockbuster hit in 2023, writers from the series are speaking out on sizably reduced residuals from the streaming sensation.

Sisters Nora and Lilla Zuckerman served as producers on Suits Season 4, supervising producers on Season 5, and writers on both 16-episode seasons. Yet their residual checks don’t properly reflect the show’s streaming success — one of the egregious issues WGA and SAG-AFTRA members are fighting to amend on the picket lines. To stress the severity of the situation, during a Zoom call with Decider, the Zucks pulled up residual payments received for a single episode of Suits from both 2016 and 2023. For writing “Blowback” (Season 5, Episode 11), “I received $12,568.57 in residuals,” Lilla said. “That was back in 2016, where I imagine it was probably being sold internationally and re-airing on USA. This year, 2023, where Suits has been viewed for billions and billions of hours on Netflix, I received the grand total of $414.26 on that episode.”

Meanwhile, Ethan Drogin — who served as a writer, producer, and executive story editor throughout eight of Suits‘ nine seasons — revealed in an LA Times article that he only received $259.71 in streaming residuals last quarter for writing the Season 1 episode, “Identity Crisis.” Furthermore, he reported that “All together, NBCUniversal paid the six original Suits writers less than $3,000 last quarter to stream our 11 Season 1 episodes on two platforms.”

Despite the series’ recent surge, Suits writers aren’t seeing anything close to the residual amounts they received before the streaming era. “It’s really hard to sort through all these checks, because you get dozens of them that are like $7 here, $30 there, and so forth. But that’s with Suits airing on two different major streaming platforms. It’s this blockbuster hit, and I received a grand total of $414 for it,” Lilla explained. “You hope that maybe some magical check will arrive, but it does not appear,” Nora added.

[From Decider]

I remember back when Friends was originally airing on NBC, the cast worked together to not only be paid the same per episode, but negotiate a special deal with the residuals for the show. Meaning, the cast negotiated a side-deal to get paid millions in residuals when repeats aired on cable. I wonder if the side-deal also included streaming? Because Friends was also a huge hit on Netflix for a time. Anyway, sorry for that tangent, but my larger point is, the streamers are screwing over everyone. The Suits writers, producers and show runners are getting screwed out of tens of thousands of dollars in residuals and you know it’s the same for the cast as well.

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, NBC/USA/Suits.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

11 Responses to “‘Suits’ writers confirm: the streamers are screwing us out of residuals”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. MSTJ says:

    Perfect timing to make a strong case for the unions. They need to fix the streaming compensation system.

  2. ThatsNotOkay says:

    The streamers pay an okay sum upfront and then pennies in residuals. I’m sure most writers and performers would prefer they be paid nominally upfront and get rewarded on the back end (gross) with residuals, etc., so they could keep their health insurance and have income in leaner years. It’s more profitable to participate, on the whole, than it is to get a decent sum upfront, if something is a hit. And I’m willing to bet most people like to operate as thought their show is going to be a hit and are willing to take that gamble. Streamers are losing money because they are undercharging customers, but that’s not the writers’ or actors’ fault. Fix your stupid business model, but even if you don’t, you need to pay the talent. Peridot.

  3. Becks1 says:

    the only “good” thing here is that it so perfectly exemplifies why the writers and actors are striking. We’re seeing headline after headline about the billions of minutes Suits is being streamed, and these writers are getting paid a few hundred dollars, if that? The difference of 12k to 400 dollars for one episode, syndication vs streaming, is so striking. this is what the strike is about. These shows are breaking records and the people involved are getting very little in return relatively.

    It really is like Suits hit Netflix at the perfect time for this strike.

  4. Amy Bee says:

    I think it’s unjust for the streamers to refuse to pay more in residuals.

  5. BlueNailsBetty says:

    Who wants to math on this lovely Friday morning?!? Me!

    3,700,000,000 hours x $.00001 = $37,000

    If the streaming companies paid the creators even $.00001 per hour of viewing the (Suits) creators would be receiving $37,000 for those viewings.

    Granted, they deserve to earn more than $.00001 per hour but I’m making a point. The streamers are abusers, liars, and manipulators who are refusing to pay the people who made them phenomenally wealthy.

    Even if the current income on streamers doesn’t allow for this, then the income structure needs to change and the pay/residuals definitely need to be brought in line with movie/television residuals.

  6. Jais says:

    So Netflix is touting the big suits streaming numbers, but iirc, they’re actually pretty opaque in terms of revealing the streaming numbers for their shows. Isn’t part of the residuals issue that there is no transparency about how many times a show is actually watched? It’s all sketchy. Pay the people for their work, for their art. Soulless vampires.

  7. UpIn Toronto says:

    I feel like cancelling all my streaming services!

    • Layla says:

      I did the second Netflix cancelled Lockwood and co.
      It’s so unfair how corporations can easily get away with their sh*t

  8. SarahCS says:

    Excellent timing. These real world examples are the perfect counterpoint the multi-millionaires telling us that these people need to be more reasonable in their demands.

    Keep them coming.

  9. MSTJ says:

    Does anyone know what the Amazon streaming numbers are for SUITS? I don’t see those numbers being reported anywhere.

    Adding Amazon numbers to what has been reported by Netflix and Peacock would give a wholistic picture of the show’s popularity.

    Does Amazon report numbers for any of its shows?

  10. Sue E Generis says:

    Meanwhile, they pay ridiculous sums to names that are popular in the moment to produce content that barely cracks the top ten for a day or two then disappears forever.