Woody Allen walked the Venice Film Festival carpet with Soon-Yi & their daughters

Woody Allen premiered his latest film, Coup de Chance, at the Venice Film Festival. His stepdaughter-wife Soon Yi joined him at the festival, as did their two daughters, Bechet Allen and Manzie Tio Allen. They walked the red carpet together and it was… something. Allen also spoke to Variety at length about his latest film, his fiftieth, and how it might be his last. Woody basically lost all of his American financing circa 2017-18, and Coup de Chance was made in France, with French actors, and I think it was made entirely with European financing. Woody’s films aren’t super-expensive to make, which is why there are still people who will give him money to make movies. Some highlights from this Variety piece:

On financing: “I have so many ideas for films that I would be tempted to do it, if it was easy to finance. But beyond that, I don’t know if I have the same verve to go out and spend a lot of time raising money.”

He’s an advocate of the #MeToo movement. “I think any movement where there’s actual benefit, where it does something positive, let’s say for women, is a good thing. When it becomes silly, it’s silly. I read instances where it’s very beneficial, where the situation has been very beneficial for women, and that’s good. When I read of some instances in a story in the paper where it’s silly, then it’s foolish. It’s silly, you know, when it’s not really a feminist issue or an issue of unfairness to women. When it’s being too extreme in trying to make it into an issue when, in fact, most people would not regard it as any kind of offensive situation.

A poster boy for Me Too: “I said years ago that I should have been a poster boy [for the #MeToo movement] and they got all excited about that. But the truth is, it’s true. I’ve made 50 films. I’ve always had very good parts for women, always had women in the crew, always paid them the exact same amount that we paid men, worked with hundreds of actresses, and never, ever had a single complaint from any of them at any point. Not a single one ever said, ‘Working with him, he was mean or he was harassing.’ That’s just not been an issue. My editors have been women. I don’t have any problem with that. It’s never been on my mind in any way. I hire who I think is good for the role. As I said, I’ve worked with hundreds of actresses, unknown actresses, stars, mid-level actresses. Not one has ever complained and there’s nothing to complain about.

On Dylan Farrow and the “Allen v. Farrow” docuseries: “My reaction has always been the same. The situation has been investigated by two people, two major bodies, not people, but two major investigative bodies. And both, after long detailed investigations, concluded there was no merit to these charges, that, you know, is exactly as I wrote in my book, “Apropos of Nothing.” There was nothing to it. The fact that it lingers on always makes me think that maybe people like the idea that it lingers on. You know, maybe there’s something appealing to people. But why? Why? I don’t know what you can do besides having it investigated, which they did so meticulously. One was less than a year and the other one was many months. And they spoke to everybody concerned and, you know, both came to the exact same conclusion.

On cancel culture: “I feel if you’re going to be canceled, this is the culture to be canceled by. I just find that all so silly. I don’t think about it. I don’t know what it means to be canceled. I know that over the years everything has been the same for me. I make my movies. What has changed is the presentation of the films. You know, I work and it’s the same routine for me. I write the script, raise the money, make the film, shoot it, edit it, it comes out. The difference is not… from cancel culture. The difference is the way they present the films. It’s that that’s the big change.

He thinks the film industry has issues: “I don’t like the idea – and I don’t know of any director that does — of making a movie and after two weeks it’s on television or streaming. This is not a high cultural point. There were many wonderful films made in the past, and you don’t see many wonderful films made now. When I wanted to go to the movies, there used to be three or four films I was dying to see. Every week there would be a film from Truffaut and Fellini and Ingmar Bergman and Kurosawa. Now, very few European films are playing in the United States to begin with. I think we’re not in a wonderful place culturally, certainly not in cinema.

[From Variety]

I’ve seen people suggest that Woody was basically saying that Coup de Chance might be his last film, but that’s not my takeaway at all – he’s basically letting people (financiers) know that he actually wants to keep making movies but he needs someone to step up and finance them because he’s not going to hustle around for money at this point. As for everything else… what a mess. I’m giving myself a Virgo Szn gift and I’m not going to get into it.

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

86 Responses to “Woody Allen walked the Venice Film Festival carpet with Soon-Yi & their daughters”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Lala11_7 says:

    I can’t…so I won’t 🙁☹️😤😡😠🤬

    • blunce says:

      TikTok Brut account has amazing video on him getting hacked on the carpet by a group of young protestors (both men and women) chanting “rapist isn’t an awful man. He is the perfect son of patriarchy” and causing wonderful chaos. But of course, that doesn’t make it on the screens and interviews.

  2. Lattenow says:

    Gaslighting pedophile. I believe Dylan.

  3. Eurogirl70 says:

    In a word: YUCK!🤮

  4. North of Boston says:


  5. Well what I want to say is ….. nah he isn’t worth wasting my breath.

    • Peanut Butter says:

      Bye, predator. Skating past a couple of investigations that went nowhere absolves you of nothing.

  6. Kitten says:

    “I don’t know what it means to be canceled. I know that over the years everything has been the same for me.”

    He’s so close to getting it….

    These photos are giving me Jaycee Dugard and her captor vibes smdh.

  7. Scarlett says:

    Excuse me while I go throw up and wash my eyes out with bleach, to forget I ever saw a pic of this predator and his victims.

    • Saschafrom76 says:

      Can’t even read this watching this pedophile be feted makes me vomit . Also I hope soon yi is ready to be replaced by one of his new “technically not daughter” daughters. You know at least one of them is his new victim.

      • Scarlett says:

        I am a survivor of SA as a child, and experience has taught me that the predator has a specific pattern, a specific type they go for repeatedly. Sadly, you are right about the “technically not daughter” daughters. ( Though I really wish maybe, just maybe he learned his lesson. )

  8. molly says:

    Are both daughters biologically theirs? Because, instead of them looking 50/50 biracial, they look 0/100.

    (Genetics are fascinating.)

    • Scarlett says:

      Both the girls are adopted.

    • Amy Bee says:

      No, they’re adopted.

    • Smalltowngirl says:

      They are both adopted.

    • molly says:

      Ah. Thanks for the info, y’all.

      (I’d google, but I don’t want his name on my search history.)

    • Mrs.Krabapple says:

      It boggles my mind that he was allowed to adopt those two girls. Even IF you believe he didn’t molest any of Mia’s girls (and that’s a big “if”), by marrying Soon-Yi he has shown that AT THE VERY LEAST he does not consider non-biological kids to be “his.” That makes for a very poor adoptive parent.

      • J says:

        I agree. I mean, why was he not completely canceled the moment he DATED his equivalent of a step kid while she was a teen?! And possibly earlier? Why did people still support home based on that alone

      • anna says:

        Well, Soon Yi was never Allen’s adopted kid. She was Farrow’s and Andre Previn’s.

  9. Coco says:

    “I don’t know what it means to be canceled” is one of the only truthful thing he said in this article.

  10. k.tate says:


  11. Amy Bee says:

    Woody Allen is delusional. And why is Variety interviewing him?

  12. Smalltowngirl says:

    I hate him. Truly and completely. I believe Dylan 100% and always have.

    I hate that people are giving him a platform.

  13. AmyB says:

    His stepdaughter-wife Soon Yi joined him at the festival – enough said.

    Then of course are the sexual abuse allegations of his daughter Dylan who I believe 100%

    He is vile and disgusting.

  14. HeatherC says:

    Oh Woody. Think of the untarnished cinematic legacy you could have had…..if only you had kept your hands to yourself and not shatter your daughter’s childhood.

    I believe Dylan.

    What I can’t believe is anyone still gives this unapologetic pedophile any sort of platform.

  15. Brassy Rebel says:

    Some of his best friends are women! That begs the question which is that his issues aren’t with adult women. He is clearly attracted to little girls and teenagers. And this was a problem long before Dylan Farrow or even Soon-Yi. Case in point, the movie Manhattan in which he played a forty five year old having a sexual affair with a seventeen year old hs student. Even he knew this was nasty which is why he scripted it as he wanted to end it but she wouldn’t. Why this failed to cause outrage at the time I’ll never understand. Instead it was hailed as a great movie. To be clear, Allen is a gifted film maker. No question. But he is a pedophile. These two things are not mutually exclusive.

    I have seen Allen vs. Farrow twice. I totally believe Dylan. Knowing the facts, it’s impossible not to.

    • Brassy Rebel says:

      Also I wonder if he has had that drooping eyelid checked out. That could be very serious and may explain talk of his last film.

  16. dawnchild says:

    Sh**ty gaslighter.
    Fed up with so-called European ‘sophistication’ too. If it lands you as the refuge of pedoes, then you can keep your dead palaces and paintings

  17. Thelma says:

    He makes me feel sick. Disgusting pos. I guess he could replace Soon-Yi with one of the girls since they’re “technically not his daughters” (sarcasm intended).

  18. Patricia says:

    I love Woody Allen.. He is brilliant, funny, witty, an amazing writer and a musical expert with various types of music. He has been married to Soon Yii for nearly 30 years. I love that their daughters are reflective of both their Asian and Caucasian patents. Ask yourself if a court would allow an adoption for Prince Andrew, especially young girls,
    and then realize that Woody has been vindicated by that court.
    I read a biography of Mia F arrow and it gave me an interesting insight into her life and times and explained d some questions I had.
    I stand with his good friend Diane Keaton when she said “I believe Woody.” So do I. And I don’t believe Mia. I do however believe that antisemitism has a strong effect on this “story.”

    • C says:

      What an absolute dogsh*t take. As a Jew I am appalled by you trying to assume antisemitism has any part of this. If Diane Keaton is so steeped in Stockholm Syndrome from this guy who rotated her and her sisters like concubines to feel she wants to defend him, then she can, but it does NOT make him innocent.
      You don’t have to believe Mia because she is also a mess. But you can believe Dylan, and the facts, which is that Allen has always had a fetish for being a predator and it even shows up in his movies.
      And yes, he’s been married to his DAUGHTER for 30 years. It sickens me when people try to use the “THEY AREN’T BIOLOGICALLY RELATED” argument. He was a father figure to her and that’s it. Adopted children are your children.

    • Scarlett says:

      @Patricia, what a crappy hill you chose to die on, supporting a pedophile and his pedo apologist friend …it’s not about their being biologically related; it is about the power dynamic; he was the father figure in her life, wow….just wow….your post cannot be real, are you trolling everyone???

    • Chaine says:

      This is such a false representation of what courts concluded. Courts did NOT vindicate him. A vindication would be if a court found him not guilty and none did! I’m just going to quote from an article on this:

      First the criminal court—-
      “Connecticut state’s attorney Frank S. Maco announced that while he found “probable cause” to prosecute Allen, he was dropping the case because Dylan was too “fragile” to deal with a trial. Mia Farrow agreed with the decision, he said. Maco told People that Dylan was “traumatized to the extent that I did not have a confident witness to testify in any court setting, whether that’s a closed courtroom or an open courtroom.””

      Second the family court—
      “ a Manhattan judge ruled that Mia Farrow should receive custody of the children, and that he was not convinced “that the evidence proves conclusively that there was no sexual abuse.” The judge also said psychotherapists who interviewed Dylan Farrow had their judgement “colored by their loyalty to Mr. Allen”

      For more see https://www.yahoo.com/video/why-woody-allen-wasn-t-194700343.html

    • ariel says:

      You don’t believe Dylan. A grown woman who said in plain terms- Woody Allen molested me.
      He was never vindicated by the courts he just had better PR.
      In fact the only – Allen sponsored of course- report that was favorable to him- was invalidated as the facility “burned” all their notes- not allowing the other side to read them.
      This is a disqualifying event.
      In a court of law, both sides get experts, both sides produce favorable reports, and both sides are allowed to look at the “materials” used by the “expert” to reach their conclusions.
      The fact that the allen favorable report has zero medical back up – is something that is not widely reported, yet it is 100% true.
      Diane Keaton thinks she has such good taste in friends that her friend could never have been a molester- that is all about her and her ego- she could never be fooled.

      Woody Allen was obsessed with Dylan and molested her.

      And when you say you don’t believe her- or pretend her version does not exist- and only read the powerful PR apparatus used by a powerful man- you spit on all molestation victims.
      May god have mercy on your soul.

    • Mallory says:

      “I love the man and will now attack his victims for him!” – the battlecry of every Pick Me

      • SIde Eye says:

        This right here. Thank you Mallory. I’m getting off this thread I am getting so pissed off.

        I believe Dylan. This pedo was a father figure to Soon-Yi and wound up marrying her. It’s gross. It’s inexcusable. STOP GASLIGHTING THE VICTIMS WITH YOUR BS EXCUSES. My child is 15. His friends come over all the time. They sleepover. I take them places. They are not even technically in my family or living with us. Do you think, when they turn 21, I am going to prey on those kids with the logic that they are adults? I am a parental figure in their lives FFS! They will always be the little munchkins that asked for an extra grilled cheese, etc. Like are you kidding me???

        Even if he did begin the relationship with Soon-Yi when she was 21 (which I don’t believe for a second) is it legal? Technically yes. Is he vile for crossing that line? Absolutely. You’ll never convince me otherwise. That is a sick SOB right there he belongs in jail for what he did to Dylan AND Soon-Yi. He even tells us he’s a pedophile through his films. Almost every movie is an old fart with sagging balls and a humpback preying on a teenager and a lot of times it’s frigging him playing his damn self.

        I’ll see myself out now. I get so so triggered by pick mes. It will be a cold day in hell before I throw a child under the bus for some creep.

    • ThatsNotOkay says:

      You are wildly misinformed and grossly ignorant. Careful linking this to “antisemitism.” You adulterate a very valid cause when you hold a credibly accused abuser up as your patron Saint of victimhood and provide ammunition to the most antisemitic of all.

    • Coco says:

      Patricia is probably another paid bot that runs to Woody Allen’s post all over the blogs to sing his praises and say negative things about Dylan and anyone who supports her. It’s been happening for years most of their comments are copy and paste of the same thing under a different name.

    • Bama says:

      Ewwwww. Your post is absolutely disgusting.

      • Kkat says:

        Ok Patricia (woody)

        The anti semitism thing is bullshit, I’m Jewish and everyone else Jewish I know think he is a f*cking pedophile

        He wasn’t exonerated, the prosecutors never said that they didn’t think he was guilty, the complete opposite.
        It was because Dylan was too fragile for a trial.

        He was taking naked lewd pictures of Soon-yi when she was a teenager, he’s disgusting and a pedophile.

  19. Jan says:

    Woody is supporting the Spanish FA molester, saying he didn’t rape the player.
    They were women protesting him and his film.

  20. ThatsNotOkay says:

    Other now women then teens say he groomed them too. So…yeah. You should be on the poster: America’s Most Wanted.

    Also, he bought off the DCPS in New York, which fired the guy who concluded the accusations founded, and the Connecticut case stopped because Dylan was fragile, NOT because he isn’t a monster. I will repeat this forever, until every last person on earth hears it and lives with that on his/her conscience.

  21. Bad Janet says:

    Really? They really said there is nothing to it, and he’s innocent? Not, we can’t find enough evidence to carry on with charges from a decades old case, regarding allegations of someone who was a minor at the time? Cause that’s not the same thing.

    A lot of people won’t be able to reconcile the guy who married the step daughter he raised with a guy who would never geoom or abuse another step daughter, and Allen just has to live with that.

    • GamerGrrl says:

      It’s not that simple – he’s just reading it that way. There’s a very thorough account of what happened on Wikipedia, but be warned – it’s graphic and disturbing. tl;dr – this went through various officials and they didn’t reveal what they concluded, just that Dylan needed a lot of therapy and there were issues to address. He also sued for custody and was denied.

      • Bad Janet says:

        Oh, I know it isn’t that simple – or rather, it is. Not guilty doesn’t mean innocent in a US court of law and it never has; lacking evidence to prosecute has never meant no crime was committed. He is deluded. A victim in his own mind.

        He is nothing more than a classic narcissist.

  22. Jenna says:

    I can’t wait until this child molester stops getting positive coverage by the media.

  23. Chester says:

    Everyone is entitled to an opinion, but at least get the facts straight. Farrow and Allen were never married. Soon-Yi is NOT his step-daughter. She was 21, a legal adult, when their relationship began.

    • NJGR says:

      She and Allen say she was 21; it is entirely possible she was much younger.
      And he was in loco parentis to her beginning when she was quite young.

      • Brassy Rebel says:

        Evidence was presented in the documentary that the relationship began when she was still in high school. Strong evidence. There were witnesses that she arrived at his apartment still dressed in her school uni (Catholic high school!). Maid said when the girl left she was directed to change the stained sheets.

    • Jenna says:

      Talking about Dylan – the underage daughter he molested – not the other daughter he groomed (and waited until she was or age to marry 🙂 )

    • Bad Janet says:

      He was absolutely her step-father, for all practical intents and purposes, regardless of legal technicalities.

      Knowing what we know about brain development at 21 and the power differential in their relationship, he gets no pass from me for her age (if it did start at 21, including the grooming, which is unlikely) or the legal status of his marriage to Farrow.

      • SadieMae says:

        And the thing is, Soon-Yi was adopted at an older age (not as an infant) after a background of severe trauma and neglect. It is extremely common for children with that background to have attachment problems in their adoptive families. Sometimes this manifests as rejection, but oftentimes it manifests the other way – the child seeks out attention and affection in unhealthy ways. And it’s super common for them to test the waters sexually with adults in their lives and/or to be particularly susceptible to agreeing to inappropriate overtures (because it feels like love to them).

        Anyone who is involved in the life of such a child needs to be aware of this and keep that boundary absolute. Sure, technically Soon-Yi wasn’t Woody’s daughter, but come on. He is the father of her siblings! She would absolutely have experienced him as a type of father. And he knows that. He’s not stupid.

        In becoming involved with Mia, who was the mother of several adoptees with complex backgrounds, Allen should absolutely have educated himself on the issues that a kid who has suffered trauma/neglect can face and on how to help keep those boundaries strong. Or maybe he did know, but he just didn’t care because “The heart wants what it wants.” (My guess is that he’s such a narcissist, he thinks any woman is lucky to have him, regardless.) Either way, he’s an absolute monster just based on what we KNOW he did, even setting Dylan’s accusations aside. And I’m sure it’s the tip of the iceberg. I just hope their daughters are safe from him, but I wouldn’t be surprised if he turned his attention to them. He is vile.

    • J says:

      Chester, your girlfriend’s kid is effectively your step kid. Maybe not in law but in relationship. When he started taking his girlfriends teen kid to basketball games…and then moved in on her…and possibly before…puke. Your girlfriends kid (oh and also your kids sister) is not a dating option.

    • Jaded says:

      @Chester — Mia found nude photos Woody had taken of Soon-Yi when she was only 16.

      • Turtledove says:

        @Jaded. The articles I found say she was 21 when the photos were taken. Not trying to argue, I think he is as guilty as they come. But more that I couldn’t believe anyone could possibly defend him if the nude photos were of her at 16.

        OK, really, I don’t know how anyone could defend him. Putting Dylan aside. Everything about the relationship with Soon Yi is sooooooooo wrong. He cheated on his gf with her adopted daughter, and there was a 35 year age gap.

        So many people want to split hairs to defend this. “She wasn’t HIS daughter”. Ok, but Allen and Farrow were in a long term relationship. They had biological and adopted children together. SoonYi was a sibling to those kids. I feel like they are all defending this with such determination, like “well it is not actually incest as she isn’t biologically his. ” And “he never adopted her”. I fail to see how that makes it all right?

        My Mother in Law had a surprise baby late in life. So my husband has a younger brother who is more like a nephew than a brother, because the age difference is so vast. I met the brother when he was in pre-school and had a relationship that was very much an auntie type situation. He is an adult now. If I cheated on my husband with him, that would be beyond gross. No one would be arguing that it was fine because I am not actually his aunt/sister. And just using it as an example grosses me out. Also, there are articles where Woody admits to having feelings for her when she was in high school. He would take her to basketball games. It’s all out there in black and white.

        But then you add in the Dylan situation and I just can’t understand how ANYONE believes he is innocent of ANY of it. When you combine the 2 situations, it becomes that much harder to disregard. Not to mention all his movies where extreme age gaps are a feature. If the age gaps in his movies were the ONLY factor, fine. But add in “his married his son’s sister who is 35 years his junior, who he was a pseudo father figure to” AND “his other daughter said he molested her” and it is baffling that anyone could possibly defend him.

  24. Lala11_7 says:

    That OTHA pedo’s new movie is getting HORRIFIC reviews…I wish the SAME for Woody…ALWAYS 😡

  25. Tish says:

    He looks like a ventriloquist doll in that last pictures. Eek!

  26. Seraphina says:

    Has anyone noticed how close together they all in the pic. The body language is saying they are like a wall – very interesting. When you see Anjelina Jolie and her kids it’s all very natural looking but Woody’s – just seems off.
    And as far as his me too crap- let me go vomit and brush my teeth.

  27. QuiteContrary says:

    I believe Dylan. And I respect Ronan Farrow even more for his support of Dylan.

    Woody Allen is an abusive, entitled monster. His self-pity and martyrdom are disgusting.

  28. bisynaptic says:

    Wonder what he’s done to his newest “daughters”.

  29. Monlette says:

    I am old enough to remember how this case unfolded. I think he is a major league creep and weirdo for screwing his girlfriend’s daughter and thinking she can forgive him of that. I never liked him or his films, but I don’t believe that he molested Dylan.
    The way I remember it, Mia was outraged and trying to get Soon Yi to say that Woody raped her when she was underaged. When Soon Yi said that wasn’t what happened, Mia cut her out of her life. Then suddenly it was Dylan that was raped, though a medical exam contradicted that.
    Mia was behaving like a scorned woman, and even Dylan spoke like Mia was the victim. I think Dylan was brainwashed into thinking she was attacked and that is just evil on so many levels.

    • C says:

      It is hilariously appalling how many people try to cape for this old rapist.
      Understand this – Soon Yi had no consent to give to the act of Woody grooming her and having sex with her as her father figure. She may not regret her relationship, but let’s not pretend this was an “affair”.
      “Then suddenly it was Dylan that was raped.” Your memory is inadequate compared to the specifics of this case, outlined here and available on the internet.

    • Jaded says:

      Of course Mia was a victim — she was a victim of Woody’s predation on her daughter, one that Soon-Yi welcomed. You have only one recourse in a situation like that, you cut that person out of your life. Dylan has always been unequivocal in her depiction of what happened, her story never varied. She never said she was raped, and by rape I mean forced intercourse, however the term rape, as it’s been clarified in Trump’s E Jean Carroll trial, can mean digitally or orally abused, and that’s exactly what Woody did. Please read over Dylan’s transcripts before you make inaccurate statements like this.

  30. HandforthParish says:

    Just got when I thought I couldn’t like him more, Allen is now bravely defending Spanish FA boss Rubiales.
    In his words, “He wasn’t raping her, it was just a kiss and she was a friend. What’s wrong with that?”
    No words. Is that was he said about Soon Yi at the time?

  31. LyZe says:

    Here’s why I believe Dylan. When she talks about the molestation she distinctly recalls the smell of the dusty attic, the colors and the sounds. If you’re ever been abused you know how true those observations are

  32. Sass says:

    Reading this I was able to unintentionally swap Trump’s face in because wow, they’re the same gnarly nasty person.

  33. Relly says:

    “Gosh, I don’t know why people still think I molested my stepchild,” says the man who groomed and married a different stepchild.

    It’s beyond parody at this point.

  34. samipup says:

    I’m getting ” Young Frankenstein” vibes from Wooda**’s face

  35. Jaded says:

    Woody may state that he’s a feminist and has always put women in starring roles and hired female staff, HOWEVER the roles women have played in his movies have always been either insufferable beyotches, or crazy, silly and immature, and are continually depicted as sex objects. Here’s a real eye-opener of an article in WaPo about his personal archives. Prepare to be disgusted…https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/i-read-decades-of-woody-allens-private-notes-hes-obsessed-with-teenage-girls/2018/01/04/f2701482-f03b-11e7-b3bf-ab90a706e175_story.html

    • Brassy Rebel says:

      Thank you for this link, Jaded. These archives should be published on the Internet for all the world to see. It would be much harder to make all the bad faith arguments about how Allen is just a misunderstood genius.

    • windyriver says:

      Wow, just wow. 50+ boxes of his personal papers (at Princeton?!) demonstrating every conclusion you can draw from how women are depicted in his movies and especially his clear obsessions about “relationships” between an older man and very young woman are a complete reflection of exactly who Allen is, and has always been, as a person. His history with Soon-Yi is his sick fantasies come to life. People who know him well have to have been aware of all this. And since the papers include screenplays, treatments, and pitches with a teenage girl as a main character (in addition to his private musings, blech), a wider audience of industry people must also have been privy to his thinking. Disgusting. There’s so much of this stuff, it manages to be both thoroughly revolting, yet banal, at the same time.

      And I absolutely believe Dylan.

    • Deering24 says:

      Jaded–and we won’t even get into how POC practically don’t exist in his movies. One could make an excellent case that he shut out a good three generations of great POC actors from stardom, because his movies used to at the least put actors on the map in the industry. Or turn them into stars.

    • Anna says:

      And men in his films are serious and mature?? LOL

  36. ojulia says:

    I believe Dylan. I believe Mia.

  37. Dani says:

    Woody Allen is despicable. He’s 87 years old so hopefully will not be around that much longer.

  38. JTh says:

    I believe that Woody had molested Dylan.