Prince William is predictably incandescent about Diana’s ‘ghost’ in ‘The Crown’

As we discussed earlier in the week, The Crown’s final season will feature a “ghost Diana” storyline. Season 6 will deal with both Princess Diana’s death and the aftermath of her death for the Windsors. Peter Morgan, the show runner/writer of the series has apparently written some scenes where Diana’s ghost makes appearances before then-Prince Charles and Queen Elizabeth II. It sounds cheesy more than anything else, but the royal commentators have tried to claim that Ghost Diana will be seen as deeply offensive to Diana’s sons. The way people were ranting about it, it made me want to defend Morgan’s narrative choice. As we’ve seen since Diana’s passing in 1997, it actually does seem like she’s haunting some of these people, and that the Windsors truly never recovered from “the Diana saga.” Well, Tom Sykes at the Daily Beast got “sources close to Prince William” to rage on his behalf about The Crown’s Ghost Diana.

This year, protests against The Crown and Harry are likely to be louder than ever after the show, which debuts its final season on November 17, kept a part for the ghost of Harry’s mother, Princess Diana, whose death in a tragic Paris car crash was dramatized at the end of series five. According to reports circulating in the British media, a phantom Diana will be shown talking to both then-Prince Charles and the late Queen Elizabeth.

She reportedly tells Charles: “Thank you for how you were in hospital. So raw, broken—and handsome. I’ll take that with me.” In another scene, her ghost holds hands with Elizabeth, saying: “As long as anyone can remember, you’ve taught us what it means to be British. Maybe it’s time to show you’re ready to learn too.”

Understandably, the news hasn’t gone down too well in loyal royal circles. A friend of Prince William’s told The Daily Beast he would be “totally sickened” by the scenes while a friend of the queen’s, who apparently never watched The Crown, said: “Thank god she will never even hear about it.”

The friend of William’s said, “It’s incredibly hurtful to have his mother exploited over and over again in this tawdry fashion by Netflix. He won’t watch it, but he will be totally sickened by it.”

Asked whether William would be angry with his brother for continuing to work with Netflix, the friend said: “William is angry about a lot of things in connection with Harry. His decision to work with Netflix, who have ruthlessly exploited the family, is certainly one of them.”

Charles, William and Harry’s offices did not return requests for comment, however a friend of King Charles and Queen Camilla sought to play down any sense of irritation they might feel, saying that while he and Camilla have watched some of the series, they “don’t really care” what Netflix does. The friend added: “It’s pretty ridiculous at this stage anyway. I think the program has lost the credibility it had in the early years.”

Asked if it would increase antipathy towards Harry, who is still in a multi-million dollar deal with Netflix, the friend said, “They don’t like some of the stuff the BBC has made over the years but they wouldn’t take against everyone who has ever made a program for the BBC.”

The attempt to disentangle The Crown from Netflix and Harry is understandable, but one television executive told The Daily Beast that for Netflix, having Harry and Meghan as well-known faces of Netflix was indeed relevant to how The Crown is perceived. “Royal content is massive for them and they probably would have signed Harry and Meghan for the documentary anyway. But The Crown is one of their biggest shows and signing Harry and Meghan certainly had a halo effect on its credibility.”

A Netflix source defended the new scenes with Diana’s ghost to the Daily Telegraph, saying: “After her death, Diana appears as part of an inner dialogue in separate scenes with Prince Charles and the queen who are both reflecting on their relationship with the late Princess. These sensitive and thoughtful imagined conversations seek to bring to life the depth of emotion that was felt after such a seismic tragedy struck at the heart of the family.”

[From The Daily Beast]

From a narrative perspective, I understand why Morgan would write a scene between Charles and Diana’s ghost, because Charles is still clearly haunted by her memory and what she said and did during her life, and that sense was even stronger following her death. I don’t get putting Ghost Diana with QEII too, because clearly, that woman never gave a sh-t about Diana and QEII was fully prepared to ignore her even in death. As for William throwing yet another tantrum… give it a rest. “Netflix is exploiting us!” Dude, do you have the franchise on exploitation with your careful photo-ops with Black folks and your inherited feudal wealth? And Charles better not go on another campaign against The Crown – Morgan has helped his image so f–king much.

Photos courtesy of Netflix.The Crown & Avalon Red.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

31 Responses to “Prince William is predictably incandescent about Diana’s ‘ghost’ in ‘The Crown’”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Oh I kinda like the “maybe it’s time you learn too” line she gives QEII! Kind of a little dig especially with all those many many many many people who lined the streets and laid flowers everywhere for Diana. I like to think that maybe that was the dig. Look how many people loved me.

  2. Lucy says:

    Look, I’d be incandescent about some sappy purple prose bs that a writer came up with for my dead mother to say too. Especially telling her ex husband that he was so handsome? WTAF.

    The rest of the article is filler garbage with Sussex baiting.

  3. Truthiness says:

    More glow up for Charles if Diana’s ghost mostly says “thank you, you were so raw and handsome, I’ll take that with me. ” They had been on better terms for sure but it doesn’t feel like everything she’d say. Especially given her fear of being killed in a car accident.

    • Jais says:

      Omg this. If that dialogue is correct, they’re using Diana’s ghost to compliment and absolve Charles. No, just no. Charles must be sending Morgan bags of money. What I’d really like to see is Diana visiting Charles and Camilla together as they reenact Macbeth. Out damned spot.

  4. Molly says:

    I don’t like the whole “ghost” thing. It’s not necessary and it’s kind of trite to put a transparent “vision” of her. Why not do the same with him seeing flashbacks and hearing her voice talking to him now? Seems much more real to me, as what would actually be happening to someone having that inner conversation. Let her do a voiceover. Skip the theatrics.

  5. Brassy Rebel says:

    Let’s face it. The Windsors are only happy with what they can control. This is embarrassingly bad dialogue, but what does it say to the British public that this is what the royals care about? They really have gone full soap opera.

  6. BizzatchExtrordinaire says:

    I actually agree with the quote, “It’s pretty ridiculous at this stage anyway. I think the program has lost the credibility it had in the early years.” Just not for the same reasons. It lost all credibility for me when they chose to go easy on Charles last season, caving to palace pressure. Diana wasn’t a saint, but come on! I remember when it premiered, Kaiser (I think?) said that no one expected it to be completely factual, but that it did represent much of the truth of how ridiculously things are run and how stunted and selfish the royals actually are. The subsequent seasons did that as well, although there was a bit of pullback. Last season, though? Yeah, they lost me.

    • ArtHistorian says:

      Season 5 was just so incredibly disappointing. I can’t really get excited about this show anymore. Season 4 was just Fire! And then season 5 was just this sad spluttering out of a story that should have been interesting. The season was just boring and that really is the worst sin a movie/tv show can commit.

      • Where'sMyTiara says:

        A “sad spluttering out”… Kinda like the monarchy itself, innit?

      • Nic919 says:

        I agree. The events that had the most potential were handled so poorly I’m season 5.

        This ghost just makes it a joke. Morgan was behind The Queen, the movie that started this all and he’s covered how the queen felt following Diana’s death without the use of a cheesy ghost.

        This is such a downgrade.
        (Unless the ghost reports are false, but I think media have advanced copies so they are likely correct)

  7. Wannabefarmer says:

    Does he glow while he sweats?

  8. L4Frimaire says:

    Another “what about Harry” dressed up as an article. Does anyone even care about the Crown after last season and how bad it was? This season seems a bit pointless and don’t even see why the palace or William is even paying attention to this limp show. It seems like the UK press is trying to generate outrage clicks and controversy. Basically seems the whole point of the article was to insert Harry’s name into it and link him the royals once again. These guys, and William, are coming across as a little thirsty for attention.

    • Carty says:

      The way they tie themselves in knots over Harry’s Netflix projects is something. Meghan hanging out with the president at the Beyoncé concert has them shook. Wonder if RF will keep this same incandescent rage at the Beckham’s too for their Netflix show

  9. C says:

    I can’t blame him. I find the idea repulsive too – insensitive and if the showrunners are just going to use her to, in the end, prop up the institution that Diana suffered through then it’s doubly ridiculous.
    They made her look terrible in season 5.

  10. Betty says:

    Idk After the Palace made a big stink about last season only for it to be sympathetic towards Charles and Camila, forgive me for not believing this new “outrage.” Especially knowing the propaganda they’re ending with is William and Kate’s courtship. How amazing that it worked out that way for them, huh? In a time where the cheating and pegging rumors are out, it’ll end with a “fairytale” romance.

  11. Mary Pester says:

    I’d prefer to have Diana saying, “nicely done Charlie, nicely done, I always knew you would get rid of me somehow, but surely you knew I would never rest easy while you and your surrogate mother sat on the throne. I’m still here Charlie and I’m staying” 🤣😂🤣and as for Harry, this sykes idiot needs to keep Harry’s name out of his fking mouth! The incandescent one can go play with his emojis. He is fast becoming irrelevant

    • Jaded says:

      Yup. She’s still living rent-free in that fecking family’s heads. I can imagine what Diana would have said to TQ from the great beyond…”Well it looks like you got your way, I was *conveniently* gotten rid of, but I had the last laugh! The people love me and respect me, things I couldn’t get from my husband and you.”

  12. Lisa says:

    there is one point in all the salty pearl clutching that I do agree with – the program has lost the credibility it had in the early years. I feel like the first few seasons really were quite spectacular.

    Unfortunately last season was a real disappointment. For me, who lived through the Diana years, and saw first hand the greek tragedy unfold of this woman who’s largest fault was her popularity and persona, i was truly angered at how they portrayed Diana in the last season. To now use the specter of this poor woman to build up KFC, is really horrid.

  13. AnneL says:

    Ugh. I hate it when a woman who has been wronged speaks from beyond the grave in any way to let people off the hook. Usually it’s not a ghost, just some third party like a friend or sister saying “she wouldn’t have wanted you to torture yourself” or something. Them making Diana an actual GHOST just makes it worse.

    It’s cheesy. It’s also, IMO, just wrong. Don’t put words in her mouth. Not ever what happened to her. If she can’t speak for herself any more, Peter Morgan should not be speaking for her.

    • Libra says:

      I agree. The writers are making the false assumption that there are people who believe that the dead can return as ghosts to speak. And that’s not the worst of it. Putting cheesy, corny dialogue in the dead persons mouth is just too much. Jumping the shark, a reference to writers who have run out of ideas.

  14. Amy Bee says:

    If those are really scenes, Diana lets them off the hook instead of haunting them. Corny.

  15. Cessily says:

    *haven’t read the post yet only saw the headline.

    I just saw the headline written here and had to laugh. Princess Diana has been and will continue to haunt chucky and the others forever. It’s pretty fitting because Princess Diana remains more popular and loved in a way they will never understand. But I’m sure the crown will not use it as a metaphor but it will make it creepy and weird.

  16. sparrow says:

    Feel for W here (and H). i’d not want my mother’s ghost brought up as a deus ex machina for a tv show. Another load of bollocks will be if they sugarcoat W&K’s uni years as a falling in love story, rather than the falling into the path of a stalker escapade it truly was. utterly convinced that W’s “meeting” with K at this very point paved the way for his jealousy of H’s true love for M.

    • Jaded says:

      We KNOW WanK’s story is going to be portrayed as sugary sweet and cheesy as a soap opera, that’s why I have no interest in watching this season. They certainly won’t show the real Kate as a club hopping party girl flashing her bits getting drunkenly in and out of limos, or mean-girling and snubbing any other women who get too close to William.

      • sparrow says:

        Bang on the money there, Jaded. Not watching it, either. Not prepared to slog thru kate beng portrayed as a great beauty when she was bog standard, nor the fantasy of their relationship as anything but shoddy desperation on her part. This is the one aspect of her life that no amount of press sugar can change, and she hates it. You’ll no doubt remember how she recently told a group of teenagers she’d “never wanted to be a royal but fell in love with William”. No one bought it, not even her rabid DM fans. No one forgets how their ‘relationship’ was years of kate waiting around for W to pick up and drop as he wanted. i wonder how truthful netflix is going to be, or how much it has been influenced by the BRF to change facts.

  17. tamsin says:

    A ghost. Clearly Diana haunts the Windsors, but I thought Morgan was a better writer than to use this hoary old device. Besides, Shakespeare has the copyright on it.

  18. JR McGraw says:

    Agreed the ghost Diana is beyond embarrassing and offensive—and, KP just proves the point once again that the RF can and do complain and explain when they feel like it—especially if they can rope H & M into their list of complaints.

  19. QuiteContrary says:

    The British royals can’t have it both ways. They can’t insist on being part of the fabric of British culture and then complain when popular culture uses them in ways they don’t like.

  20. Jay says:

    Oof, I love Elizabeth Debicki so much and this just sounds embarrassing. And if Charles really thinks that Diana would come back from the beyond to tell him how “handsome” he is, I guess we can now see where William gets his “hunk” delusions. Just embarrassing at every turn.

  21. Darkwing Duck says:

    Can’t believe they are still doing the whole “Harry has worked with Netflix so Harry is responsible for Netflix’s output” bankrupt reasoning to drag him into this story. William had his whole family promoting Netflix’s Attenborough documentary didn’t he? And they worked with the BBC after Panorama as mentioned.

    He and Charles are going to get a good edit I’m sure and the nation will return to loving The Crown once more, as they did when the subtext was basically ‘”isn’t Queen Elizabeth ace?!”

    Isn’t their advisor Robert Lacey absolutely scathing about Meghan? But sure, the Sussexes have loads of influence the storylines, practically write it themselves.

    Diana’s ghost appeared in the 2014ish play and 2017 TV movie “King Charles III” (which at the time seemed to depict an unimaginable near future like an episode of Black Mirror). The media and Palace have had years to get any hysteria about the concept out of their systems. Confected outrage as usual.

  22. Saucy&Sassy says:

    If Peter Morgan has Diana’s ghost rehabilitate KFC or EQ2 rather than saying something more pointed? I hope Diana’s ghost haunts KFC and the Escort and Peter Morgan.