Bond: ‘The Crown’ is ‘tasteless, ghoulish and breathtakingly insensitive’

In past years, certainly around The Crown’s Season 4, you could trace the Windsors’ hissy fits in the press. As in, you could tell that now-King Charles had directed his staff to brief against Netflix and The Crown. You could see that the palace had reached out to former government officials and allies to throw big, public tantrums about how The Crown was “deeply unfair” to the poor Windsors. Even John Majors’ office got involved, as did Margaret Thatcher’s old political aides. What’s interesting about The Crown’s Season 6 is that, so far, there’s been none of that. It actually feels like the British media is trying to goad Prince William into saying something or going on a tirade against Netflix. Well, they’re still trying to make “the dramatization of Ghost Diana is deeply offensive” into a thing. Peter Morgan even addressed it in his recent Variety interview, that it’s not really Diana’s ghost per se, that “ghost Diana” appears to QEII and Charles as they’re trying to process her death. Well, royal expert Jennie Bond has some thoughts!

The Crown’s depiction of Princess Diana’s ghost appearing in front of her ex-husband Prince Charles and the late Queen has been slammed by a royal expert as “breathtakingly insensitive.”

The controversial scene, which will air later this month, comes following her death in Paris, and will see Princess Diana, played by Elizabeth Debicki, appear before a mourning Prince Charles, played by Dominic West. In response to the backlash, a Netflix source said that Elizabeth’s appearances as Diana after her death are “visualisations of innermost thoughts” rather than “intended to be interpreted as supernatural.”

Speaking to Fabulous, royal commentator and TV presenter Jennie Bond says Netflix should be ashamed: “I don’t care how ‘sensitive’ the Netflix executives say they have been. Depicting William’s dead mother as a ghost is tasteless, ghoulish and breathtakingly insensitive. And portraying her in the days that led up to her death, and her funeral, is shockingly thoughtless, painful and unnecessary.

“How would any of us feel if a TV drama decided to dramatise our mother’s sudden and tragic death? We all know what happened to Diana, and if you don’t, look it up online. There is absolutely no excuse for piling on the suffering that William, and Harry, have endured since that day in 1997. Shame on Netflix.”

[From The Sun]

“Depicting William’s dead mother as a ghost is tasteless, ghoulish and breathtakingly insensitive.” Harry literally wrote a book about how he believed his mother was alive for years following her death, and he also wrote about how his family neglected him – then a 12/13 year old child – following Diana’s death. There’s a lot of insensitivity to go around, is all I’m saying. There’s no use pretending that Diana was solely a mother and that it’s inappropriate to talk about her or dramatize her life. She was a public figure whose death nearly brought down the whole institution. It’s part of the historical record that the British head of state was too self-centered and emotionally constipated to pay tribute to her daughter-in-law and mother of her grandchildren. It’s also part of the historical record that there are still so many unanswered questions about Diana’s death.

Photos courtesy of The Crown/Netflix.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

25 Responses to “Bond: ‘The Crown’ is ‘tasteless, ghoulish and breathtakingly insensitive’”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Beverley says:

    When Diana died, Elizabeth’s initial non-reaction came across as indifference and I never saw QE2 in the same light again. She couldn’t even pretend for the sake of her grandsons. Whenever Elizabeth’s memory is being aggrandized, I can’t help but remember what an asshole she was to Diana.

    • Andy Dufresne says:

      The Royal Family’s indifference towards Diana’s death is a reflection of their true personalities in my opinion.

      It is somewhat true that Diana’s ghost still haunts them to this day, no matter how many times the media and the BRF tries to re-write the past.

      The people will always remember.

    • BlueNailsBetty says:

      Same. The queen’s reaction and behavior to Diana’s death ripped the blinders from my eyes and I saw Betty in a completely different way.

    • WithTheAmerican says:

      To me, it said they were glad she was gone and held her in deep contempt, which begs the question what if anything did they do to bring it about.

      • beautifully broken says:

        At the very least, they took away her security and threw her to the media wolves–which certainly were major contributors to her death. At the very worst, they paid for a motor bike to flash a light in the driver’s eyes, with the likely prime instigators being Prince Phillip or then-Prince Charles. I can just hear Charles saying that he didn’t cut off her head like his ancestor.

  2. Brassy Rebel says:

    The royals and their sycophants just want the whole Diana era to go away. The violent death of the divorced wife of the Prince of Wales and the Queen’s ex daughter-in-law should never be interrogated in any way. No sense in reminding the taxpaying public how we got here.

    • aftershocks says:

      ^^ Right. 💯 It has been over 26 years since Diana’s death, and yet she is still so present. It is as if the events that led to her death happened yesterday. The entire institution of the British monarchy is “tasteless, ghoulish, and breathtakingly insensitive.” Thus, The Crown, is on point in the approach Morgan has taken in dramatizing events which will never die.

      The firm and rota should have nothing to say! They continue selling Diana’s memory and her image (without impunity), in addition to trying to rewrite her story, and to censor their fakakta role in her history! 🤬 The other part about this is, whoever is behind Diana’s death, and I ain’t talking about Henri Paul and probable faulty seatbelts, is as ‘ghoulish and insensitive,’ as bloody hell! 😈💀😡👻

    • Agreatreckoning says:

      All that you said @aftershocks and more. The BM/RR/commentators are actually tasteless, ghoulish and breathtakingly insensitive.imo Jennie Bond famously put out a supposed quote by Diana during her final summer? I will shake it off

  3. Cessily says:

    “Bond: The Crown is tasteless, ghoulish and breathtakingly insensitive” my response to that is..
    They must have captured the BRF to perfection.🤷🏻‍♀️

  4. Blithe says:

    How noble of the Sun to openly acknowledge the decades of vulturing that William and Harry have already endured thanks to publications like the Sun. Oh, right. They didn’t. Guess WHY “looking it up online” is an option. It’s mind boggling, really. Abuser states openly that only THEIR abuse deserves something other than “shame”. They really ought to be ashamed of themselves, but they’re clearly not.

    • aftershocks says:

      ^^ Exactly! And riddle me this Salty Isle nonces: What could be more ‘tasteless, ghoulish, and breathtakingly insensitive,’ than forcefully persuading two grieving boys to walk behind their mother’s coffin during the midst of deeply anguished international mourning for a beloved, yet perpetually hounded young woman? 👀

      Especially when the profound wailing by crowds of mourners was certainly not greater than the grief, the confusion, and the unspeakable loss Harry and William were suffering from, and were never helped to manage, much less to overcome. 😳🥺😖🤮

    • aftershocks says:

      @Blithe, what you have expressed is so apt on many levels! In one respect, all of the adoration and fascination the public had for Diana was immediately transferred to teenager, William, who at that point in time, resembled his mother quite a bit. The problem is that he was not only grossly ill-equipped to deal with such overwrought idolatry, he had also done nothing to earn that level of worshipful, global attention (aside from being Diana’s first-born son, and heir to a throne he was unsure of willingly accepting).

      As time passed, and Harry grew older, the firm began over-protecting Willy and using the ginger Spare as a scapegoat. Thus, Willy never learned from his mistakes, and his character flaws became endemic. Instead of loving guidance, discipline, needed therapeutic counseling, and assistance in discovering interests and skills other than his unavoidable heir-doom, Willy got nothing but hamhanded p.r. embiggening, with everyone tiptoeing, and hem-hawing around his fits of incandescent rage.

      Moreover, younger bro Harry and every girlfriend he managed to date were harassed, spied upon, and pummelled under the wheels of the rota carnival bus. The worst was yet to come, when Harry finally and life-savingly met his soulmate, Meghan. Nothing can be more ‘tasteless, ghoulish, and breathtakingly insensitive’ than the horrible way the firm and the rota have treated, and continue to treat the Sussexes! 😤 Thus, Jennie Bond can take several seats, STFU, and GTFOH, post-haste! 🧹🕳

  5. Eurydice says:

    Blah, blah, blah, shock, horror, blah, blah. As if there haven’t been hundreds and hundreds of books and articles about Diana and her death – how is this more insensitive?

  6. Amy Bee says:

    The real reason Jennie Bond is upset is because the Crown is reminding people how and why Diana died and the Royal Family’s slow response to her death.

  7. AnneL says:

    These writers really are the champions of exaggeration. It’s not just “insensitive,” it’s BREATHTAKINGLY insensitive!” Can they express any opinion without clutching their pearls so hard they choke themselves?

  8. Bettyrose says:

    From a stylistic standpoint I prefer a subtle approach to depicting inner turmoil and the specters that haunt us. But Diana’s ghost has been such a constant presence in the BRF that it’s a wash. Imply it. State it directly. It’s just the truth.

    • aftershocks says:

      ^^ 💯 Literally, figuratively, definitely, infinitely, abso-f’ing-lutely!!! By a wide and vast margin — too much to measure — too deep for words!

  9. Nic919 says:

    Jennie Bond has profited from criticizing the real life people for decades but she’s upset about a pretend tv show? A huge hypocrite.

    Besides Morgan has turned this into The Crown (Chuckie’s version) for several seasons now.

  10. Lau says:

    Jennie just needed to highlight Diana as just “William’s dead mother” (even if she adds Harry a bit later). Those people treated Diana terribly when she was alive and they expect to be able to use her to their benefit now she’s dead.

  11. Michele says:

    Great… another season of “you can get better information from the National Enquirer” than you can from this show. I’ve seen every season, so far, thinking I’m missing something. It must be terrific because of the awards received. It’s crap. Nothing is revealed. Nothing is shocking. They’re just really stupid royals who should be ousted and the money taken away and used for good.