Hardman: The Sussexes should start making lowkey visits to the UK

Robert Hardman sort of lucked out, releasing his new authorized biography on King Charles just as a major royal newscycle dominated headlines. Hardman has been giving a lot of interviews in the past week, and he’s updated his talking points to include his thoughts on the king’s enlarged prostate and the Princess of Wales’s hospitalization. Hardman, like so many authorized royal biographers, is a company man who will not rock the boat. He does his best “nothing to see here, everything is going smoothly” argument, ignoring the fact that Kensington Palace and Buckingham Palace seem incapable of doing the same. Some highlights from Hardman’s interview in the Times:

What Hardman makes of all of the medical drama: With three senior royals out of the picture — Prince William, 41, has cancelled all engagements during his wife’s time in hospital — he views this as “a reminder that we have a slimmed-down monarchy. Elizabeth II had all her cousins, a whole extended family she could depend on. That’s not going to happen. There’s even less to go round for the next few weeks. But it just adapts and evolves. If it doesn’t adapt then it is doomed. It can’t stay in aspic.” In the short term, Hardman, 58, says we can expect “a bit of shuffling, but January is always a bit of a quiet time…[but] the back-up team is there: Princess Anne, the Edinburghs”. The result, however, will be a period of the monarchy being perceived as quite elderly.

William’s decision to scale back work commitments during his wife’s recuperation: It is “in keeping with the modern regular guy that I perceive him to be. I’m sure in previous generations that would have been more heavy lifting for the nanny,” but William will want to “keep things as normal as they can be” for the couple’s three children.

The Windsors will have to disclose more from here on out: Given this new level of transparency, Hardman says that from now on “people will expect that degree of clarity. If a member of the family goes to hospital, I don’t think they’ll be able to say it’s a minor operation, they will probably have to say what it is. That’s moving with the times.”

The future of the monarchy: Hardman believes the monarch’s future is “looking solid”. He adds: “It’s not a ratings game, they know that.” But there are long-term challenges that can’t be overlooked. Of the 14 realms outside the UK that the King inherited, nearly half are in the Caribbean. Reparations for slavery are a gnawing problem. “That is a debate that is not going to go away,” says Hardman. “It needs very careful handling. I think he’s going to be much more engaged in that than perhaps people think.”

The Sussex circus. “Charles is a realist, but he’s an optimist. Bridges can be rebuilt. Gradually, a new modus operandi will evolve, maybe when the children are a bit older.” He says that the way forward “is to make it less of a thing when they come over to Britain. The more that they do start coming back, maybe in the summer, to see Dad up in Scotland or whatever, that sort of thing very gently will lead to … some rapprochement between Harry and Meghan and the King.” However, Harry’s relationship with William is a “much more complex issue to be resolved”, and he says he wouldn’t be surprised if there was a sequel from Harry or indeed a book from Meghan.

[From The Times]

Re: transparency… I’ll admit that I was pleasantly surprised that Charles did disclose his prostate issue and the clarity provided by BP likely soothed a lot of nerves and ended up calming everything down. It would have been much worse if Charles had done what Kensington Palace did, which is gracelessly obfuscate and refuse to do the bare minimum of transparency. The difference, I suppose, is that Charles is the head of state and Kate is not. Then again, the palace failed to disclose vital pieces of medical information about QEII’s health in her final years, so it can be done – which makes it even smarter that Charles did his disclosure.

As for what Hardman says about the Sussexes… again, this is coming from Charles’s official biographer, and this is probably close to Charles’s perspective, that the Sussexes have to make the effort to make peace and travel to Scotland this summer, etc. Which will be difficult because Charles has made it abundantly clear that Balmoral is whites-only and I don’t imagine he will extend an invitation to the whole Sussex family for anything. I hope the Sussexes spend the summer going on beach vacations and working on their projects.

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

67 Responses to “Hardman: The Sussexes should start making lowkey visits to the UK”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. No I think Harry is keeping his family safe and until he gets the protection he wants he will not be bringing his family to salt isle. He may come every now and then for his charities but that’s it. He doesn’t need to do anything for this cult after all the lies and harm they have done to him.

    • Anonymous says:

      Robert Hardman is dreaming. Besides, Charles is not interested in his grand-children by Harry because they are mixed ethnicity, in other words they are black. Harry already told us in the CBS interview (USA) 2023, that he is not coming back. Harry is never bringing his family to the UK. His father stripped him, his wife, and his own grandson of security, took away Frogmore that Harry’s grandmother gave him. RAVEC stripped Harry of UK Met police security while in the UK. Harry only goes to the UK for business or court hearings with his own private security.

  2. Dee(2) says:

    I honestly don’t even think this is the wish of Charles, I think it’s the wish of the people that write these books. There’s only so many times you can regurgitate the exact same stories told by six different people, and they seem dead set against actually writing about what’s going on in that family and with the Wales’ marriage. They want and need new stories and about people who will actually sell books. None of them are making Spare numbers that’s for sure.

    • Tina says:

      Yah Charles does not want them back. He wants the attention and the love on him and Camilla. I truly don’t think Charles gives two sh*ts about his kids. He had them with a woman he didn’t love because he was forced to because of his role. He did the bare minimum with them. And now both are causing him headaches. I do think that Harry’s depiction of Camilla in Spare is probably unforgivable to Charles. He spent decades rehabilitating her image to make her Queen. Harry’s lawsuits also bring all of the palace leaking back to the forefront and we know that Camilla was knee deep in all of that.

      • molly says:

        I think Charles THINKS he loves his kids. He just has no idea how to be a loving and involved father, given his upbringing and the centuries of hereditary rule before him.

        And, yes, plenty of people become great parents despite their own circumstances, but the British royal family just isn’t set up for that. Charles never stood a chance.

  3. equality says:

    If I were Meghan I don’t think I would ever set foot at Balmoral. If old Chuckles wants to see the children there are flights to the US daily and he can well afford one. Or he could make arrangements to meet elsewhere.

  4. Over it says:

    Excuse me chuck, what about Harry and his family security? What about their house you took away? Meghan is still being abused by a bunch of racist lunatics who would love nothing more than to bring harm to her , her husband and their children .when chuck gets off his rare and calls a press conference and says he would like the abuse to stop and he is so sorry for any pain he has caused, then maybe then Harry and his family can consider visiting chuck . However it will Have to happen at the airport because Like Kaiser said , Balmoral is still whites only . I would hope Meghan and her children visit chuck on the 12th of never . He won’t get to treat her like dirt ever again and definitely not those two beautiful babies of theirs

  5. Maxine Branch says:

    Hoping the Sussexes continue to protect their peace and safety by staying as far away from Harry’s birth family as possible.

  6. Amy Bee says:

    I always get the impression that Harry doesn’t enjoy Balmoral. He barely went there as an adult so the expectation that he would take his family there is indeed coming from Charles’ camp. Plus, Hardman just assumes that all it will take for reconciliation is the children getting older. If they don’t get the security they need it’s unlikely that they will ever go to the UK.

    • equality says:

      It was where he was when Diana died, so maybe associations with that? And now QE died there and he associates it with Meghan being snubbed. Might not be somewhere he wants to spend time.

  7. sparrow says:

    No, they shouldn’t. Because when this is all over, it will be flung back in their faces. Whatever is going on with Kate may be very complicated and nasty – and let’s face it, large parts of the media here and abroad will know, as will people surrounding her care who’ve let a word slip here and there. Just let her and her family get on with it; she’s got more than enough help. H&M should not be propping up an institution that didn’t protect them as family members in their own right and when they needed it most.

  8. tokes14 says:

    Why would Harry take his family for regular visits to a place where he doesn’t have a home and has no security?

  9. Jan says:

    Summer Camps for American children, Archie will be enjoying swimming in a lake somewhere and Lili at a playgroup for half day.
    Harrry said Archie was very busy.

  10. Nubia says:

    What does ‘official’ biographer mean,The subject has approved the writting and signed off the book?

    • Amy Bee says:

      Basically, yes and that they allow people to talk to the author.

      • Katy says:

        Absolutely Amy, however Hardman was on a Loose women.yesterday and l.was surprised by him, he said the Queen loved Harry and was delighted they called Lilli after her but was upset by the BBC and press coverage if it, .she thought Willis who was far too ‘serious,’ but interestimg he let it be known the Queen insisted Harry close the London Olympics over Charles and William.!! .

        I thought he was far more positive yesterday about Harry and less so.about the other brother , l.wonder where he got his talking points ??

      • Amy Bee says:

        @Katy: Hardman has been backtracking on the Lilibet story since the middle of last week because it made the Queen look bad and the public’s reaction to the story has been so negative.

      • Ameerah M says:

        I think he’s back-tracking because he got a cease and desist letter from Harry’s lawyers.

      • Amy Bee says:

        @Ameerah: I think if he got a cease and desist letter he would have leaked that to the press. He didn’t anticipate the backlash to this story and that it fell on his beloved Queen and that’s the reason why he’s backtracking.

    • Jais says:

      So he actually said it was not an authorized biography and he only spoke to the people around Charles. But of course those people had to be authorized by Charles to speak with him so semantics. Either way, he’s been played and made a fool over the whole lilibet story.

      • Amy Bee says:

        @Jais: He’s not telling the truth. His book basically gives the Palace’s side of the story. The press have said that Hardman, who did the coronation documentary and the Philip tribute, had the Palace’s blessings to write the book.

      • Becks1 says:

        Giving people around you permission does not mean you had any kind of say over the final book though.

        And I feel like if this WAS an official “authorized” biography Hardman would say that and wouldn’t lie about it. That makes zero sense.

      • Ann says:

        Depends on what you want them to say. It could be something you don’t want traced back to you.

  11. Brassy Rebel says:

    These royal reporters or commenters or whatever the f*ck they are should all have Ph.D’s in ignoring what actually happened that caused the Sussexes to be gone in the first damn place. Why would they even consider coming back? They don’t even have their own place to stay, having had that ripped away. And I guarantee they won’t be staying at Balmoral. So what exactly is in it for them to return besides more abuse and racist dog whistles? The return of the Sussexes to Britain is a royalist wet dream.

  12. Tessa says:

    Mr Hartman tell the king to give frogmore back to harry and Meghan

  13. Becks1 says:

    Well if Charles wants H&M to make more visits to the UK then he needs to provide security for them – and no, staying at Clarence House or Sandringham with Charles and Camilla and their team is not the same thing.

    And then as a threshold matter – I dont think H&M have any desire to go to balmoral. I think its very telling that when they did go to Scotland, it was to the Castle of Mey, not Balmoral. Balmoral just seems like a place for the family to try to curry favor with the monarch, plus all the rules, plus Harry’s memories of the place.

  14. Cel2495 says:

    The best Harry and his family ( Meg and kids) can do is stay away from the toxicity that is the BRF. They build their life already and they need to protect that.

  15. Nanea says:

    These people are taxpayer–funded. They should be required to be transparent about how the money is being spent.

    And there should be a minimum amount of work they need to do. No regular person funding *them* can take 19 weeks off or more, and do school runs regularly, *and* stop doing the bare minimum just because a spouse is ill. They have a staff of 60, plus nannies, plus tax-dodging grandparents nearby.

    Sorry. There’s nothing “modern” or “regular” about Bulliam, he’s play-acting, pretending to be a country squire who doesn’t care about the well-being of the peasants. Even if they starve, or school buildings can’t be heated properly.

    As to the Sussex circus? Yeah, no. Too bad these people can’t be bothered to do their research, at least for a book, who started what *and* went against the wishes of QEII.

  16. Eurydice says:

    Last week, there was a piece that actually included Meghan and the kids in the talk about Harry coming back – and now, here we have another one. Interesting.

  17. Lulu says:

    The door is always open, well except they cancelled his security and evicted him from his home.

  18. Kelsey says:

    NOPE, because if that’s what they wanted, Harry suing for the ability to use adequate security measures while in the UK wouldn’t even be a thing. It was all hee hee haw haw Harry has to let us know 28 days in advanced when he wants to grace us with his presence, and now that they have their way, they’re finding out it sucks. Sucks to SUCK. Y’all be safe out there.

  19. Cessily says:

    So far this book on the new King seems to be a rehash of the daily fail and that families hate campaign against the Sussex’s, and of course they think the Sussex family should fly there to genuflect and receive their quarterly abuse with the children in tow to witness it all. I would truthfully question the mental health of any who chose that. Looking forward to see how badly this book ranks in a year.

  20. Mary Pester says:

    Harry mostly hated being at Balmoral. When he was little he was shuffled of to play with the cooks children, her daughter Heather has some wonderful stories of that time. It was there that Ken Wharf first pointed out that William was a spoilt brat and was allowed to run riot and blamed any breakages on Harry. And of course the Queen mother always sided with William.
    As for soft lad (more fitting name than Hardman) he needs to get some rear view mirrors, because at the rate that he’s back peddling, something big is going to hit him in a minute.
    Why the hell would Harry and Megan want to take their precious children to the lair of medusa and the rage monster. If Harry and Megan ever set foot in the UK, I think it will be to stay with a member of his mothers family, and no one will know till they have left again

  21. Mary Pester says:

    Harry mostly hated being at Balmoral. When he was little he was shuffled of to play with the cooks children, her daughter Heather has some wonderful stories of that time. It was there that Ken Wharf first pointed out that William was a spoilt brat and was allowed to run riot and blamed any breakages on Harry. And of course the Queen mother always sided with William.
    As for soft lad (more fitting name than Hardman) he needs to get some rear view mirrors, because at the rate that he’s back peddling, something big is going to hit him in a minute.

  22. Harper says:

    Harry is making soft visits back to the UK to sue the pants off the tabloids and hopefully bring them down so looks like Hardman’s dreams are coming true.

  23. QuiteContrary says:

    That whole “slimmed-down monarchy” is one more scam the British people have been sold.

    As so many others have pointed out on this site, the only thing that’s been slimmed down is the number of people on the balcony — not the amount of public money that gets poured into the monarchy.

    I hope Harry and Meghan stay far, far away from that group of grifters.

  24. Proud Mary says:

    Especially with the palaces needing as many distractions as possible, no visit by Harry and Meghan to the UK will ever be “low key”. It would require absolute cooperation by Charles’ staff, and zero leaks to William or Camilla. You can already see the problem. Not only because of Harry and Meghan, I think that both palaces need to clean house– massive firings should be in order. Unfortunately, William and Charles can’t sack themselves.

  25. sparrow says:

    If Harry and Meghan were to come back, there’s a good chance they’d be welcomed warmly and soon become very popular. As we saw with the Windsor flowers, people were delighted to see them. I was over the moon! Asking them back is a double-edged tactic for the BRF; they desperately need these two, but would be dumbfounded as to how to manage the star power they’d no doubt unleash. Kate was hugely jealous of Meghan from day one; should Meghan be in the British public eye for months, her sister in law will go mad.

  26. Anonymous says:

    “I hope the Sussexes spend the summer going on beach vacations and working on their projects.”

    That part.

    Imagine Will waiting like a rabid hyena ready to pounce on Harry? Not to mention how out of control the press and paps will be if they were to ever visit. No thank you.

  27. Fancyhat says:

    Honestly the best thing Charles could do for his PR is to attend Invictus Games with Harry & Meghan in Canada next year.

    • Dara says:

      He doesn’t even need to do that, merely mentioning them on one of his social media accounts or inviting the athletes to one of his many palaces (either before or after the games) would be noteworthy. Though I’m guessing either one of those things would prompt a tantrum from William that would be one for the record books.

  28. girl_ninja says:

    “I hope the Sussexes spend the summer going on beach vacations and working on their projects.”

    That part.

    Imagine Will waiting like a Cujo for Harry? That and the press and paps doing anything to get a photo of them.

    No thank you. Also, nothing prevents Chuck from going to visit his Montecito family.

  29. Laura says:

    Why?

    If the simplest factor….sunny California over rainy UK lol

  30. Jaded says:

    Meghan will never set foot in the country that nearly killed her unless it’s for Charles’ funeral.

  31. Kingston says:

    I saw a clip on twitter of this hardman fellow with the usual morning teevee talking heads, and he admitted that the book is NOT an authorized biography but that its an “authoritative” book about chucky, onaccounta he spoke to a whole bunch o’ folks in chucky’s orbit. No one seemed impressed.

    In fact, he only began cobbling it together last May at chucky’s clowning! So its a book that was bitched-up, without palace-official support, to coincide with the 1st anniversary of chucky’s reign. And of course, we saw him apply the tried-and-true strategy of using the Sussexes to sell it. It has flopped. Even his promos have flopped, what with all the walk-backs he’s had to do.

    Also, it began life at #300+ on amazon list of bestsellers and as we speak, its listed at #4,506.

  32. OnThisDay says:

    I find the Hardman’s assertion (one that’s c men nrepeayed here numerous times over the last few days) for Kate to divulge her medical condition- either to help “cause awareness” or because the RF is a state institution on tax payer money- quite troubling. No one is obligated to go public with their private health information. The benefits of awareness do not outweigh the right to privacy. Would we demand Meghan to disclose such information? She did so of her own accord, which is fine. But we’d certainly recognize her right to never disclose suicidal ideation or a miscarriage.

    • lanne says:

      If Meghan were in Kate’s position, her condition would absolutely be leaked, shouted from the rooftops. And probably dismissed as fake–that’s what Meghan dealt with in the UK. There are still people who claim her kids are fake. Reasonable people would not demand Meghan’s information, but this is the British media we’re talking about. Meghan cannot be viewed as an equivalent. They would have done anything they could do do her harm or cause her shame. They made jokes about Harry and Meghan wanting privacy, insinuating they didn’t deserve it.

      I believe that Kate has the right to her own medical privacy. But the toxic community she lives in uses the idea of privacy as a weapon to be wielded unequally. It sucks for her. People will think they are owed information about her, and the tabloids will stoop to any level to get it. If she loses her favor with the institution, it’s open season.

      • Christine says:

        100% agreed, lanne. At any moment, you can search MM on Twitter, and find a bunch of derangers claiming her kids aren’t hers, or, even more ridiculously, real children at all.

        That family has encouraged this atmosphere for coming on 7 years, and there is nothing they can do to dial it back, since not one of them will speak out.

        Except for Meghan and Harry, but they are “grifters”, according to the derangers. I will never wrap my brain around the only two people associated with the British royals who make their own money and pay their own bills being called grifters. It’s utter insanity, sponsored by the royal family and British media.

      • OnThisDay says:

        When I asked if we would demand this of MM, the “we” I was referring to is us, here. I agree that respect for MM privacy in the BM is non-existent. But I was talking about how even here I’ve seen people criticize KM for not disclosing, and often on the grounds that disclosure could raise awareness and reduce stigma (even going back to her HG), or even as proof that she’s not just taking time off.

    • Eurydice says:

      I have to disagree here. This isn’t about raising public awareness of whatever illness Kate might have. As long as the British monarchy still exists, then its senior members have meaning to the public. We might say the RF is useless, but the institution is woven into the fabric of the nation. Kate is the future queen – a future that’s closer to us because the current king is 75 – and she is supported in part by public funds.

      If the Princess of Wales is going to drop off the map for 5 months, there needs to be an explanation. And if the Prince of Wales, the right hand man of the 75-year old king, is also going to be unavailable for those 5 months, then that’s even more reason for giving the public a clear and rational explanation.

  33. Saucy&Sassy says:

    So, ‘make it less of thing when they come over to Britain’. H&M aren’t the ones who make it a ‘thing’. That’s the bm working with the brf to smear them. Why would it make a difference when the kids are older? The only thing I can think of is that they will be needed to cover for the Wales’ kids. Yeah, that sounds lovely.

    I remember when Meghan and Archie were ignored during a polo game by KHate and her kids. Does anyone think that’s going to change?

    Although two people were named as the royal racists, I’ve always thought there were more than two. Those are just the two that have been named. Sounds like going there would be a whole lot of fun for Meghan and the kids. (yes, that sarcasm)

    What I think is that QE2’s cousins should be allowed to retire and KFC should make sure they get a ‘pension’ so that they have sufficient funds to live out their lives. I realize they’ve been working pretty much their entire lives, but let them have some peace.

    Wont needs to start working and continue to work during the time KHate takes off for whatever. I think that’s why he gets all of that income from the duchy, isn’t it?

    • roooth says:

      I remember Kate ignoring Meghan at that polo match. The press & derangers attacked Meghan for not knowing how to hold Archie properly, or for holding a doll because her pregnancy was faked.
      But none of the press mentioned how little George aimed his toy gun repeatedly at Kate’s head. It was all about how cute and perfect Kate’s children are, and how Meghan was a bad mom who couldn’t even hold her baby right

      • Kat says:

        The press made light of Louis’ brattish behaviour towards Kate when he pushed his hand over her mouth and pulled faces at her. And at Charlotte’s christening Kate was holding her in a way that looked like she was not supporting her head.
        But Kate is described as the most perfect mother who ever lived.
        Poor Meghan was pulled apart over anything concerning her children.
        When ever Kate and Meghan were photographed together, the poison arrows coming from Kate were almost visible.Her behaviour in church towerds Meghan was disgusting.

  34. Steph says:

    It’s later in the afternoon for this site so this was probably said already (haven’t got through the comments yet): Hardman and all the other royal commenters screeching about what the Sussexes should be doing for the firm and going to them etc need to first acknowledge that they don’t have security. They shouldn’t be called on at all but the idea any of them stepping foot on that island without proper security, never mind doing royal work is crazy talk!

  35. Gabby says:

    Harry and Meghan owe that family and the UK nothing and would do well to stay away. No one purposely inserts their children into a shitshow.

    Aside from them, this would be a delicious time for Princess Anne to bow out and retire. Boy would I love to see that.

  36. therese says:

    “Hardman, like so many authorized royal biographers, is a company man who will not rock the boat. ” Almost the first thing I thought of when I read that is…..where is Kitty Kelly when you need her? She was unafraid to rock any boat that needed rocking. I looked her up: she is 79, and in an article by the Hollywood Reporter, she is looking for her next target.

    https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/lifestyle/arts/kitty-kelley-interview-unauthorized-biographies-1235101933/

    I think I may write her and implore her to get after the royal family and their behavior and their treatment of Meghan and Harry. Wouldn’t that be delicious? If she was on the right side? Also, I think I may have to keep myself from reading or listening to Angela Levin. She enrages me. And also thrown in there is how utterly effing STUPID that woman is. How is that possible to be that stupid and to be allowed on TV? I can’t believe it. This isn’t the first time I have thought: well, I should write a book. I went into a bookstore when Tom Bower’s book came out, and I thought that if a neanderthal can write a book, so can I. I have long thought that for every rock thrown at H&M, two should be thrown at their attackers.

  37. tamsin says:

    Angela Levin is certifiable, and a dangersous little gnome who should not be allowed on any media platform. I hope she hasn’t appeared on any American television shows of late. She has been dining out on Harry and Meghan and the Windsors ever since she snaked her way into writing a biography of Harry and it’s time she started choking on it.

  38. Beverley says:

    Ffs, why in the name of all things righteous would H&M take their children to a bitter, resentful island where their home and their security were yanked from them? Why would they expose their innocent youngsters to the Firm/family which dreaded their very existence while they were still unborn? This latest attack on Lili is proof enough that the attacks on her and Archie will not end, not in the foreseeable future.

    The Sussexes owe his family nothing and they owe the British public nothing. The suggestion that they spend time in Britain without a home base or professional protection is absurd and looks to me that the starving media would love to see some dramatic replay of the NYC incident…or worse.

  39. Just Jade says:

    Well…. after they spent two weeks smearing a child without any care and told Mirror that they are very happy to finally have their truth out but now the Sussex should make visit to that Island. Sure Jane!!!

  40. AC says:

    The fact is the leftover royals are getting more and more insignificant. Blame the idiots who kicked HM out of the UK. Karmas a B.

  41. Cassie says:

    No the Sussexes would prefer to go to a movie premiere in Jamaica and be greeted with love and respect .

    I haven’t stopped smiling since the videos and photos have been coming out .

    They gonna be big mad in musty old England 😂