Jennifer Lopez got paid $5 million to attend a hotel opening in ‘anti-gay’ Dubai

In January 2023, Beyonce got paid eight figures to perform at a hotel opening in Dubai. Dubai, like many Emirate and Middle Eastern countries, is oil-rich and looking to diversify their business interests. Saudi Arabia has been getting into tennis and golf, and they’re now hosting a film festival. Dubai, Qatar and Abu Dhabi are focusing a lot of tourism and turning their emirate states into playgrounds, with high-end shopping, luxury resorts, sailing, etc. Those emirate states have also hosted tennis tournaments for years and no one on the tennis tour even blinks an eye at this point, especially not about LGBTQ rights (some on the women’s tour are gay and they come and go freely from those tournaments – a lesbian woman literally just made the final in the Abu Dhabi tournament).

Well, when Beyonce performed in Dubai last year, she got a significant amount of backlash from the LGBTQ community, because Dubai has anti-gay laws on their books. It was especially significant given the fact that her album Renaissance is very much Bey honoring queer culture and music. She never really addressed it and there was backlash to the backlash, especially because Beyonce’s gay fans in Dubai appreciated that she came. Well, I bring this up because now Jennifer Lopez is facing the exact same problem.

Jennifer Lopez is a gay icon for many, having picked up several gongs over the years for her LGBTQ rights activism. But the US superstar caused uproar last night when she pocketed a rumoured £5million to be the guest of honour at the launch of a five-star hotel in anti-gay Dubai.

Wearing an elaborate black gown, the singer hosted a bash at the One&Only One Za’abeel.

A spokeswoman for Jennifer, from her US PR company, told me earlier in the day that she would not be performing at the party yet hours later she took to the stage to sing Get Right. Dubai is part of the United Arab Emirates, which has strict laws against homosexuality.

Gay rights activist Peter Tatchell told me: “It’s very sad that a long-time LGBTQ ally like Jennifer Lopez is ­prepared to put money before human rights. Her performance will collude with the regime’s homophobia, misogyny and generalised abuse of human rights — that’s not the kind of thing Jennifer Lopez supports. She shouldn’t be going. The Dubai regime is using her to project a more liberal image. It’s a cynical exercise and it’s shameful that she is going along with it.”

Actors Vanessa Hudgens and Idris Elba also attended the glamorous soiree. Guests were given free Charlotte Tilbury make-up to get glammed up, and free-flowing bubbles and meals throughout the weekend.

[From The Sun]

Like the Beyonce situation, you could make arguments in either direction – it looks bad that J.Lo, always a supporter of LGBTQ rights, took money to open up a hotel in a country with draconian laws hurting the LGBTQ community. But on the other side, can’t you argue that every little bit helps and maybe it moves the needle? Maybe Dubai actually wants to soft-launch more tolerant policies and this is part of their cultural campaign? I don’t know. I doubt that was J.Lo’s mindset – she was offered $5 million, of course she’s going to Dubai. Something I think about too is… like, some American states have pretty hideous policies.

Photos courtesy of Backgrid.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

26 Responses to “Jennifer Lopez got paid $5 million to attend a hotel opening in ‘anti-gay’ Dubai”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Well I guess for the right price she was bought. How many more millions does one need?

  2. Nikki (Toronto) says:

    I agree. America, Canada and Western Europe are increasingly anti-gay, regardless of the laws that are on the books. While I understand the outrage, the Middle East is throwing around too much money for celebs to say no.

    This isn’t like South Africa in the seventies and eighties, because we literally have LGB influencers posting up in Dubai on their social media channels (trans people are not going, nor are they being let in).

  3. bisynaptic says:

    @Kaiser, this isn’t how the needle gets moved—at least, not in the short- to medium-term.

    • Kirsten says:

      It actually is. Boycotts work but they have to be strategic and put pressure on things like companies that are doing a lot of exporting. The more that you can open up education, sports, and entertainment, the better. Boycotting those things only further isolates the general public and gets rid of opportunities they might have.

  4. HeatherC says:

    When will artists, especially female artists, start getting flack about performing in US states like Texas?

    • Grant says:

      Comparing Texas to the UAE is a stretch IMO. Yes, Texas sucks (current Austinite here) but it’s not ILLEGAL to be gay here.

      • Joanne says:

        But it is illegal to be a pregnant woman requiring an abortion for healthcare. That’s scary enough. Imagine being prosecuted for a miscarriage. Gay rights are hugely important but they aren’t the only rights being violated.

  5. Chaine says:

    I’ve just gotten used to most celebrities being hollow hypocrites, other than Colin Kaepernick

    • ME says:

      I thought about him during the Super Bowl. Did anyone take a knee? I don’t think so. I wonder if he thinks it was all worth it. He lost his career over something everyone has forgotten about.

  6. lanne says:

    I see the issue as how unevenly the policing happens. No one seems to be calling out Idris Elba, nor the tennis players. Beyonce and Jlo get called out because we still police women, especially rich women, especially WOC.

    I see it as choose your battles. High profile women will get called out no matter what they do, so they should make their own choices based on what’s best. No one owes them praise, so if they get called out, so be it. People can call others out, but when they start acting like the Purity Police, that’s when liberals go wrong.

    • Flamingo says:

      I think what sets Jennifer apart from other paid to be there celebs. Is the fact she performed when her PR team specifically said/lied that she wasn’t.

      That just makes it a bit worse.

  7. Soni says:

    My sister is high up at a huge asset management company and they help their big partners meeting in Dubai a few weeks ago. A lot of people, including my sister, were p*ssed about going to such an anti-woman/anti LGBTQ+ country but were forced to because the CEO wanted to. Lots of money comes in from these kinds of countries so he put even his own feelings aside to hold the 4 day long event there. Hypocrisy at its finest.

  8. Carolnr says:

    “Money talks & people walk”…

  9. Naomi says:

    UAE is definitely not trying to ‘soft-launch’ less anti-LGBTQIA politics by throwing tons of cash at american performers. It’s naive, if not laughable, to think so. What UAE *is* doing is using all their oil money to ‘star-wash’ their homophobic & transphobic laws. And it’s working, because now people are both-sidesing the issue. Guess what: Dubai queer people having one fun night at a J Lo concert absolutely does *Not* make up for the constant threat of being incarcerated or worse by the government.

    Anyway, Beyonce and J Lo are two among MANY stars who have major queer fanbases (and reap the financial rewards of that) if not explicitly cater to that audience, and then turn around and pick up a check from UAE for their own personal gain. I mean, relatedly, Colin Kaepernick got blacklisted for taking a knee and instead of a boycott or real, substantive reckoning with NFL racism Jay-Z “supported” Colin by taking tons of NFL money to for bring in Black entertainers for the half-time show.

  10. Bluenoser says:

    This moves the needle backwards. JLo, Idris Elba, and other celebrities who go there aren’t there to advocate for 2SLGBTQ+ rights. They’re there to be wined and dined, some being paid big bucks. All of which showed that for the right price, you can get people to show up and shut up about the rights of vulnerable people.

  11. one of the marys says:

    It’s naive to think this moves the needle. It reminds me of china opening up to capitalism. The western democracies create partnerships and hope they can influence human rights and democratic principles, free speech etc. China cracks down on its citizens in and out of the country. The rich Arab countries are doing the same thing. They want to be normalized to the west, open for business and opportunities. But their policies are laws haven’t changed, they don’t reflect democratic ideals.

  12. dawnchild says:

    Re: tennis…Martina and Chris wrote a powerful op-ed calling this out directly in the Washington Post a few weeks ago…I’m pasting in a link below:
    https://wapo.st/3HZipZh

    I think one of the luxuries of being rich ought to be to NOT have to take money from compromised sources, and it’s disappointing that ANY wealthy and famous person, no matter gender or color, do not see this choice. We all have choices, some can exert it more than others.

  13. Steph says:

    All I can say is, she deserves Ben Affleck.

  14. Bumblebee says:

    Isn’t the leader/king of the UAE the one who had both daughters try to escape? He literally had them kidnapped by ‘security’ from the countries they were hiding in. And one of his wives, had to run to England and divorce him through the British courts. She got custody of her young children and a permanent restraining order.
    Don’t let the flashy cars, tall buildings, palm trees, and fountains fool you. Women, gays, and non-citizens have no rights. But celebrities accept money and people do business with them. Greed trumps everything. It’s horrible.

  15. Lulu says:

    This whole ‘anti-gay’ label that has suddenly become a trending criticism for why no celebrity or entertainer should ever do anything in Dubai or the Middle East is just bizarre to me. Dubai is actually known for its gay scene in the region and it has been for a very long time (i grew up there, I would know). Cops often look the other way and allow a lot of gay bars and clubs to operate without impunity. I suspect this is because there are so many gay Emiratis themselves, all the way up to their royals. I wouldn’t be surprised if homosexuality gets decriminalized at some point in the future there. There are so many rapid social strides being made when it comes to human rights, tolerance and respect. Furthermore, laws on the books don’t reflect the society as a whole, nor should everyday people be punished from access to arts, entertainment and sports based on their non-elected governments’ policies. If that were the case, so many American states would actually be considered way worse and more dangerous than Muslim countries when it comes to social mores and human rights, as American governments are actually democratically elected. I find this whole argument to be flawed, hypocritical and rooted in ethnocentrism, racism and a dash of jealousy for the good fortune of others. 🤷🏻‍♀️

  16. J.Ferber says:

    JLo is always about JLo. That is her brand.

  17. Geographymatters says:

    Just to get the geography in the article right… Dubai and Abu Dhabi are emirates within the United Arab Emirates (country) and Qatar is a country (separate from Dubai and Abu Dhabi completely). Both are located in the GCC region.