Dakota Johnson wore vintage Luis Estevez as ‘Madame Web’ gets savaged by critics

Here are some photos of Dakota Johnson at the Mexico City premiere of Madame Web. Her cast did not join her – Dakota was pretty much on her own for this last promotional leg. She wore a vintage Luis Estevez gown in a beautiful blood red. Minus the bangs, I really like this look, although I do not understand why Dakota has leaned into “plunging necklines” so hard for this tour. Granted, she has the figure for it, but it’s just sort of weird.

Anyway, Madame Web is being savaged by critics. As of this writing, it’s sitting at 18% on Rotten Tomatoes. The best mini-reviews I’ve read online are that “it’s not as bad or dumb as Morbius but it’s not good.” Meanwhile, Dakota is already trying to distance herself from the mess in real time, as she’s promoting it. She told The Wrap that the script drastically changed after she signed onto it:

It’s unclear what the original story was going to be — the actress herself doesn’t even remember — but Johnson notes that the script she read when she signed onto the film is definitely not the script that made it to screens.

“There were drastic changes,” Johnson told TheWrap with a laugh. “And I can’t even tell you what they were.”

The bigger challenge in filming “Madame Web” came from the fact that Johnson’s character can see the future, because it meant filming multiple versions of one scene, with only small differences in the shots. According to Johnson, it increased the workload for everyone.

“It added so many different camera set-ups, like triple the amount of work,” she explained. “And it was very complex, and there’s only like minor differences between each version of the same scene, so it was like puzzle pieces, and really paying attention to what moment we’re in, and what angle we’re in, and continuity and things like that.”

The actress admitted that she definitely got lost a few times in trying to keep track of exactly what they were shooting, but director SJ Clarkson had her covered. “I did. Yes, I did get very lost and SJ always knew exactly where we were, which was really incredible,” she said.

[From The Wrap]

This is a near-constant thing these days, with superhero movies and – rather famously – with the Star Wars spinoff franchises. They don’t bother locking in a script months before they start preproduction. They have a release date and a director and that’s it. So many of these huge, expensive production issues wouldn’t happen if they simply bothered to give a f–k about quality screenplays from the start.

Photos courtesy of Cover Images.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

26 Responses to “Dakota Johnson wore vintage Luis Estevez as ‘Madame Web’ gets savaged by critics”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Digital Unicorn says:

    Morbius was bad but at least all the leads could act and that alone made it bearable to watch till the end. Jared Leto and Matt Smith should work together again.

    She is such a bland actress so will give this one a pass – I couldn’t get through the trailer and her bland voice over.

    • ConcernFae says:

      I’m seeing a lot of so bad it’s good reviews from people who’ve seen it. Some people making girl’s night plans to go. I don’t see many movies in the theaters these days. Argylle tempted me, but not this.

      Showgirls seems to be the comparison film to me. People savaged it, but it was fun in a jaw dropping way. We’ll see if this becomes a cult classic.

  2. Sum says:

    They are leaning too into the cartoon shows. It’s just live action versions of the cartoons at this point. Hopefully, madame web is better than it looks.

    Dakota is distancing herself but casting her was part of the problem.

  3. Ameerah M says:

    Critics hate superhero films in general so I don’t think the reviews will matter one way or the other. Superhero films fans don’t rely on them to decide what to watch. Never have. But I don’t know if I will be paying to see this in a theater. I’m curious about it but it’s a Sony production and those films are just…not the best. Just look at that disastrous Morbius film with Jared Leto. They always manage to take these stories that could be good and do the absolute least with them. I also don’t know about Dakota in this role. It feels like a miscast to me. Madame Web is a supposed to be an older disabled woman with powers of clairvoyancy, telepathy and precognition. It would have been nice if they had stayed truer to the character in the comics and cast an older actress in the part.

    • Mia4s says:

      “Critics hate superhero films in general ”

      Disagree. Until recently the vast majority of Marvel movies had majority positive reviews. (Too positive in my opinion, but that’s subjective). Hell a huge number of them rank in the 80s and 90s % fresh on rotten tomatoes. (Just checked, 12 movies over 90% positive, so 20 of them over 80%).

      Studios just need to get back to making these movies better.

      • Ameerah M says:

        Rotten Tomatoes is not the litmus test for critical reviews . Their metric system has also been heavily criticized – by critics – for its lack of nuance

  4. Libra says:

    The critics can savage all they want but the real test is will audiences show up? I have a long memory and movies that were savaged earned big bucks. One example; Dirty Dancing

    • Ameerah M says:

      Exactly.

    • Happyoften says:

      Dirty dancing had Patrick Swayze, and Jennifer Grey…. this one is riding on Dakota’s talent, but anything is possible.

      And Nepo baby still looks bored from everyone talking about how talented her parents were, so I am not holding my breath.

      • Ameerah M says:

        Jennifer Grey was an unknown and Swayze was just making a name for himself at . Neither were huge stars at that point.

      • Flamingo says:

        Jennifer Grey daughter of Academy Award winner Joel Grey – which makes Jennifer a nepo-baby herself. But back then it wasn’t as celebrated like it is today. Jennifer had charisma and talent onscreen. It was just a badly advised nose job that deralied her career after Dirty Dancing.

        Also, I remember going to the movies in the summer of 1987 to see Dirty Dancing. The movie theatre was packed. I don’t remember it getting bad reviews but we didn’t have the google machine to fire up back then.

      • ConcernFae says:

        @Flamingo – one thing to remember is that pre-internet Nepo babies wasn’t really a thing unless the parents were super famous, like Henry and Jane Fonda or Frank and Nancy Sinatra. There was no Wikipedia, you couldn’t look up Jennifer Grey was. You’d have to read it in a profile in People magazine or somewhere else. Fans might have known this, but not normies. Also, Joel Grey wasn’t that famous. It would be more, her dad was that guy in Cabaret. The teen audience for Dirty Dancing probably would have been too young to have seen that, so it wouldn’t have registered. I certainly saw Dirty Dancing without ever having seen anything Joel Grey was in. Double checking Wikipedia confirmed that.

      • Flamingo says:

        @ConcernFae I am 99% sure I am older than you. I know, I was there, I lived the 80’s. It was just funny to me the connection of Dakota as a nepo-baby and Dirty Dancing comment. Knowing Jennifer Grey was also the child of a famous actor. Yes, most people back then had no idea she was his daughter and won an Oscar for Cabaret years prior.

    • Mia4s says:

      “One example; Dirty Dancing”

      LMAO!!! An example from the 1980s before Rotten Tomatoes, social media, 24-hour cable, pirating, streaming, and…home internet?!?

      Not quite the same thing but a sincere thank you for the laugh!!

      There are always surprise hits (I think Venom would be the example), but word of mouth on this seems genuinely toxic. And when even your lead actor can’t work up much enthusiasm? No, this is a disaster incoming.

      • Ameerah M says:

        Toxic?? You mean like how the word of mouth around any female-led superhero film has been toxic?? I mean regardless of anyone’s feelings regarding Dakota there is a trend of female led superhero films being trashed. I take that with a TINY grain of salt.

        Also – as someone born in the 80s- the world did indeed exist before social media and you could read reviews in newspapers and there was even a show called Siskel & Ebert. Where they reviewed films!

      • Brassy Rebel says:

        No one had any idea about what was in movies before Rotten Tomatoes. Hell, maybe there weren’t even movies! These kids will die on the hill of presentism. 😉 And, of course, Siskel and Ebert often disagreed. That was half the fun!

      • Mia4s says:

        I didn’t say it was a good thing it was toxic…but it is toxic. Add that to a half-hearted publicity campaign and a less than enthusiastic cast? I’m actually stunned at how Sony has dropped the ball (or surrendered?). It’s like they’re not even trying to save it.

        Yes I remember Siskel and Ebert. And there were a few others who broadcast. And you could check out a paper or two. What you couldn’t do was instantly see the opinion of 200+ critics, dozens and dozens of voices on social media, and if you were on the fence? Know that a movie would be streaming in a few weeks. It’s a very different dynamic, for better or worse. Comic-book movie wise, Venom is a closer comparator (although even though poorly reviewed, that was still reviewed much better than this is).

    • Happyoften says:

      But they were talented, just absolute fire on screen. Dakota has more of a green screen thing going. I’ve accidently started conversations with cardboard cutouts in a crowded lobby that had more charisma is all I’m saying.

      • Ameerah M says:

        I think the point is that you can’t rely on critics to tell you how you will feel about a film. Regardless of who is in it.

  5. Kirsten says:

    I love that dress and she looks fantastic. When I first heard about Madame Web I thought it was going to be a series. And even though those are also overdone, that seemed more exciting than a movie?

  6. Sandra says:

    I think this outfit would have had a more pulled together feel if her necklace had been a little more visible. It is close to her skin tone in full body pics. Otherwise I love this dress, still find her bland and uninteresting.

  7. SarahCS says:

    This dress makes her look SO tall.

    Trailers don’t always do justice to the film (better or worse) but the trailer I saw for this was just so bad I will need a lot of positive audience feedback to give it my time. It’s such a shame when we really need female led films.

    I watched The Marvels at the weekend and really enjoyed the weirdness of it (having Memory playing with all the cats? Epic) and will definitely watch again.

  8. Stef says:

    She’s just so incredibly boring, even in these photos. Also, I disagree that she has the figure for plunging necklines when she has minimal boobs. She just looks flat chested.

    After the whole nepo baby comments, she came across as lacking any self awareness and that turned a lot of people off. Would love to see her tackle a deep and though provoking role, I do think she has talent, but I’ve yet to see it shine.

  9. J.Ferber says:

    Is Dakota still dating Gwyneth’s ex, Chris Martin? If so, it’s been like ten years so far, no?

  10. Katie Beanstalk says:

    Dakota is really good in “Bad Times at the El Royale” if anyone is interested.

  11. Diana Booth says:

    She was excellent in Lost Daughter. This movie was misguided and had a horrid script.