Rob Lowe doesn’t think Nicole Kidman was ‘brave’ for her sexy ‘Babygirl’ scenes

In the 1980s, when Rob Lowe was 24 years old, he taped himself having sex with a 16-year-old in a Georgia hotel room. Guess which part of it was illegal? The “taping” part. Lowe didn’t work for a few years after that whole mess came out, but he was obviously given second, third and fourth chances to come back. He even called the sex tape “the best thing that ever happened to me.” Gross. I bring all of this up because Rob Lowe recently spoke about how it wasn’t really that “brave” of Nicole Kidman to do sex scenes in Babygirl because back in his day, those kinds of scenes happened all the time.

Rob Lowe is sounding off on how sex scenes are thought about in films today. While speaking with Sex and The City star Kristin Davis on the Feb. 27 episode of his Literally! podcast, Lowe and Davis discussed how it’s rare to have “sexy movies” nowadays, but Lowe “took it back,” given he saw Nicole Kidman‘s Babygirl which he described as “pretty great.” However, the two went on to candidly discuss about why films are now being considered “brave” for even having sex scenes in them to begin with.

“They’re like, ‘It’s so brave. She’s so brave,’” Lowe said. “She’s brave because she has a sex scene? Like, that’s brave now. In our day, it was required.”

Lowe went on to note that in the early days there would be a “page 73 rule” in the “mid-second act” where the “sex scene was always on page 73” and you “didn’t have to read the whole script” to know if an intimate scene was planned. I know, they Blue Lagoon it,” he said, “be with each other on a moonlit night. But, now it’s so brave.”

Davis agreed and said that “things have changed” and “continue to change” in the industry when comparing to their early days.

“I always feel, like, out of chaos comes opportunity,” Lowe added. “My attitude is always you make the most of it [and] disruption is actually a great time to build new things. If you can be one of the nimble ones and you could be one of the forward-thinking ones … not entrenched and not trying to re-create yesterday but try to understand tomorrow, it’s your time.”

[From THR]

He’s saying this in such a patronizing way, I almost hate that I agree with the general sentiment. Movies used to have more sex scenes. Movies used to be sexier. Most actors did films with love scenes and it was no big deal back in the day. It’s partly because of the generational shifts – the Puriteens who hate any kind of sexiness in films, the conservatism in younger audiences in general. But there’s also been a shift in recent years because actors genuinely have more power and they don’t want to do those scenes or they find them exploitative. As we learn more and more, the “Page 73” stuff Lowe is referencing was really awful for so many actresses. Plus, even back in Lowe’s day, it was rare for an actress over 40 to have those kinds of scenes, which is why people were going on and on about Nicole Kidman’s bravery.

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

15 Responses to “Rob Lowe doesn’t think Nicole Kidman was ‘brave’ for her sexy ‘Babygirl’ scenes”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. HeatherC says:

    Let’s not forget the age disparity.

    There’s a huge difference in a 24 year old man doing a sex scene and a woman staring down 60. The industry (and society) has often pigeon holed any woman over the of 30 into matronly, motherly, or worse grandmotherly roles that were more often than not asexual in nature.

    So Nicole Kidman (obviously a beautiful woman) who is 57 being “allowed” to present herself sexually in a movie for everyone to see is “brave.”

    • otaku fairy says:

      Agreed.

    • kyra says:

      Exactly — it’s not weird for there to be a sex scene with a 40- (0r 50- or 60- or 70-) year old dude getting it on with an actress in her 20s. For Rob Lowe to pooh-pooh what Nicole is doing is just so rich. WE know there haven’t been many women her age naked and sexual with a younger man on film; it wasn’t done then and there are only a handful of films now that have it, and with mega-famous women (eg Emma Thompson) only — it’s still not the norm. A naked/sexcual 57-year-old male actor isn’t open to the same level of disgust or distrust that a female actor in the same, uh, position would be anyway; truly, he knows nothing about it. He has no place reducing what women do, even someone huge like nicole who really doesn’t need his opinions to function. I’m not even a fan of hers, I just find his attitude small and cutting. What a jerk.

  2. Jane says:

    He got sober two years later and has been married for at least 30+ years and is a present father to his kids. Way to show that there is no point in turning your life around, and we should always judge people on the very worst times and decisions in their lives. Really. Perfect illustration. I can imagine the furious whispering after someone leaves the kitchen at your Thanksgiving dinner….

    • Brynne says:

      I think there’s a difference between acknowledging a terrible mistake in your past led you to rehabilitate yourself vs. expressing pride, diminishing harm, or having zero regrets. I’m not saying Rob Lowe should be “cancelled” forever, but 20 hours of community service is an extremely light sentence. Tangentially, a celebrity or public figure’s actions forever in court records is a fair thing to bring up. That’s what a criminal record is.

      • Jane says:

        You’re absolutely right. So by all means, judge for behavior a lifetime ago. I can’t stop you.

    • somebody says:

      Fine for him. Did he apologize and make restitution to the minor involved. Is she feeling like it is a lifetime ago and okay with him passing this off as just a mistake?

    • bisynaptic says:

      Rob, is that you?

  3. Peanut Butter says:

    Is he being intentionally obtuse, or does he truly not grasp the distinctions here?

  4. Thinking says:

    Sometimes he’s kind of dense….

    Someone is going to have to explain it to him.

  5. Eating Popcorn says:

    So, I have a love/ick relationship with Rob. Having read his books, and listened to his pod, & been a fan for years, but I also get the ick. I would call him a benevolent narcissist. In saying the sex tape was the best thing to happen to him, he viewed it as a wake-up call. Additionally, the 16-year-old he was with had misrepresented herself to him as someone who was 18 years old and admitted in court she lied about her age. Still totally gross! Now, he is self-involved and that’s what gives me the ick. However, he is many years sober and gives much support to many in the program in the business and in many ways doesn’t take himself too seriously, yay! He also is a great friend of Lorne Michaels, ick…so that’s where I land.

  6. Mimosa says:

    He’s an Ayn Rand fan, so I’m judging him for that and assuming he’s not very smart.

  7. Annette says:

    Like Nicole Kidman needs a lecture on how it was back in the day. He’s really not too bright.