Prince William is being gently reminded that he can’t be a work-from-home king

There’s some suggestion that Prince William and Kate were eager to distract from their non-attendance at the VJ Day 80th anniversary events, and that’s why we spent the weekend hearing about their move to Forest Lodge in Windsor. If that was a conscious PR move by Kensington Palace, they’re an even bigger clownshow than any of us ever dreamed. “Oh, you’re mad that the heir to the throne didn’t go to a big WWII commemoration? Well, he’s also moving into his fifth forever home, how do you like that??” The way the stories have unfolded in the past 48 hours has been interesting though, and by Sunday afternoon, the Mail’s Becky English was called upon to do some clean-up, some damage control and some refocusing of the narrative. Enjoy some highlights:

Forever Home Forest Lodge: The Daily Mail has been told that it is William’s ‘intention’ to remain in their new Grade II-listed property even after he accedes to the throne. ‘This is for the long term and it’s their intention to stay in Forest Lodge once he becomes king,’ a source said. Understandably this has prompted serious questions in royal circles about the long-term viability of both Buckingham Palace and Windsor Castle, as well as other private royal estates such as Sandringham in Norfolk and Balmoral in the Scottish Highlands, which the prince is eventually set to inherit.

Forest Lodge is not grand: Although well beyond the means of most families, Forest Lodge is certainly not grand – particularly when it comes to an heir to the throne. William’s decision to live there shows his determination to adopt a more ‘relatable’ way of living, in comparison with Prince Andrew’s vast 30-room Royal Lodge just a short drive away in the Great Park, or Prince Edward’s Bagshot Park, which is said to boast between 50 and 120 rooms.

All of Forest Lodge’s staff cottages: There will be no live-in staff, butlers or valets for the Waleses at Forest Lodge – an illustration of just how fiercely they guard their privacy. The same applies currently at Adelaide Cottage. However, there are ‘five or six’ two- and three-bedroom cottages – currently occupied by estate staff – just a few hundred yards away from the Waleses’ new home. Locals understand these will be occupied by the family’s security detail, housekeeper and nanny after they move in. Extra security will also be needed as Forest Lodge is outside Windsor Castle’s ‘ring of steel’. One local tells me: ‘The lodge is on a private road, close to a little village with a shop, a post office and a tea shop, which is mainly used by staff. It’s about as isolated as you can get there, so you can see the attraction for them. It’s situated in a huge private chunk of Windsor Great Park and the children can go out cycling for miles and not come anywhere near any of the local residents.’

The Waleses’ London base: Interestingly, it seems the couple will continue to work out of Kensington Palace where their Royal Foundation and Catherine’s Centre for Early Childhood are based, along with their household staff and press office. They will also retain their existing 20-room residence, Apartment 1A, at Kensington Palace, and Anmer Hall, their Norfolk retreat. However there are likely to be growing questions over the viability of their London base – not least because the Kensington apartment was refurbished in 2014 at a cost of £4.5 million to the public purse and is now used barely a handful of times a year. Might the Waleses be persuaded to use a suite of rooms in Buckingham Palace instead, allowing the Kensington apartment to be rented out commercially? It might make sense, say some.

What happens to Windsor Castle & Buckingham Palace once William is king? As for Windsor Castle, which was once earmarked for William and Catherine by the late Queen, the prospect of a full or even part-time royal resident after Charles also looks unlikely. But that is less concerning to many than the future of Buckingham Palace, the sovereign’s official London residence, not least because £369 million of public funds is currently being invested in a top-to-toe refurbishment – including a complete redecoration of the late Queen’s suite of rooms.

What happens if no one else lives in BP? One of the biggest attractions of Buckingham Palace, whether you are visiting it as a head of state, one of the 50,000 guests who attend garden parties, receptions and functions held there each year or even just as a paying punter in the summer months, is that it is the living, breathing heart of the institution. Will it have the same attraction as the nation’s most-gilded museum when there is no monarch in residence? Palace aides have always carefully insisted that Charles ‘intends’ to take up residence in ‘Monarchy HQ’, as Buckingham Palace is dubbed. A well-placed source tells me that William will be taking an even more ‘pragmatic’ approach to Buckingham Palace in the future, stressing that Forest Lodge will be his family’s only ‘long-term’ home.

William wants to open everything up for tourists: Like his father, William is keen to open Buckingham Palace to a greater number of tourists each year than at present. This would generate funds for its future upkeep while lessening pressure on the public purse. The Prince of Wales also wants to see the amount of official entertaining that goes on at the Palace expanded, possibly even using it for government and charitable events. While Sandringham and Balmoral are very much private royal estates with no public funding, it seems that they, too, could undergo a subtle change of status, and be opened to visitors on more days than in the past. All of these are clearly sensible ideas. And yet concerns remain – particularly when it comes to Buckingham Palace.

King Charles is reminding William that he can’t be a work-from-home king: Those I have spoken to are choosing their words carefully, knowing how important it has been to William to ensure that family – rightly – comes first. As one insider says: ‘The late Queen said she had to be seen to be believed. I just hope that the Prince of Wales can find the right balance between raising his family away from the public glare at Windsor with the presence required of him as a future, and eventual, head of state.’

[From The Daily Mail]

As I said in other posts about this Forest Lodge move, these feel like placeholder excuses, and it will be easy enough for “King William” to suddenly say, I’ve had a change of heart, I’m going to live in Windsor Castle now and keep an apartment in Buckingham Palace. Clearly, William and his people have the royalist press coming and going – William can say whatever he wants and the press will fall over themselves to justify it. William clearly doesn’t have a problem with telling everyone that of course he’ll live in Forest Lodge forever, because he knows that whenever he becomes king, he can live wherever he wants and, clearly, no one will point out that he and Kate don’t live together. It’s also hysterical to see William consistently bashing his relatives for living in grander homes – even Prince Edward’s Bagshot Park got a callout, damn.

Photos courtesy of Backgrid.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

63 Responses to “Prince William is being gently reminded that he can’t be a work-from-home king”

  1. “Family comes first for William” oh please what a big fat lie. He doesn’t need a gentle reminder he needs a kick in the ass and headlines that scream the real truth and even then he will still be lazy Peg.

    • liliparfait says:

      While the “Family comes first” makes Kate and William sound like such great parents, it’s gonna put a lot more pressure on their kids if they are not the most successful, well adjusted young adults ever and people will question what Kate and William were doing all those years not working so they could “take the kids to school and be normal”.

      Plus those kids will NEVER have the excuse of their parents not being present -cause Willam and Kate are constantly on top of them and using them as excuses for why they aren’t working as much – or being subjected to press intrusion (because we barely see them) or just general victims of the royal lifestyle, (because their parents have been insisting for past 12 years they are being raised perfectly normal).

      • Lauren says:

        Nah, they’ll still have an excuse.

        They were raised so normal, it’s so jarring for them to suddenly be required to fulfill royal duties, of course the pressure is so much, they might just crack and we just give them a break because anyone would act the same way.

      • Liz-L says:

        Great point Lili.

      • HeatherC says:

        Wouldn’t it be something if it came out that despite the excuses, they were never there?

  2. JanetDR says:

    But can’t he work from home though? If I recall correctly, all he actually needs to do is sign papers. The rest is just floof. Important for optics, yes.
    He apparently does not give a rat’s patoot about the optics though.

    • Nanoo says:

      He’s already being a work-from-home prince, so it’s a safe bet that he’ll be a work-from-home king. It’s not like he can be fired.

    • SarahCS says:

      The whole point of the monarch living in Buckingham Palace is they literally work from home a lot of the time. That was the point.

      The issue for Willy is the ‘work’ part not the ‘home’ part.

    • Megan says:

      Charles works from home at Clarence House. He has no intention of ever living in a palace or castle.

      • kirk says:

        Oooooh the Holy Royal Humbleness of Chuck daT’ird. But wait, isn’t the reason little Willy couldn’t move into Windsor Castle is because it’s the monarch’s home? How about Palace of Holyroodhouse, or Castle of Mey? (Mey is the one Chuck always has his hands out for donations because he’s so humble and poor.) According to a 4/4/2023 House & Garden article: “The newly-crowned monarch now counts at least seven palaces, 10 castles, 12 homes, 56 cottages, and 14 ancient ruins in his property portfolio, according to Forbes.”

  3. Lady Digby says:

    Is Will going to earn his keep or not? He upset a lot of people with his Friday no show including the faithful because it was his unquestioned duty to attend and commemorate the ending of WW2. He should have been there as heir who is very close to being King. Instead he gave no explanation and his team put out a tweet. Announcing the next upgrade on Saturday was a huge mistake and underlines his wealth and privilege. He lives a life of luxury because he is FK so he needs to do the duty required of him to justify his role. How can you be FK and not work? Only working royals get SG, security etc.,

  4. Eurydice says:

    The royal reporting industry will have to get used to the fact that the gravy train is no longer in service. William will do whatever he wants and nothing can make him do otherwise, short of dissolving the monarchy. And even if that, he’ll still be rich and he’ll still be able to do whatever he wants.

  5. Snuffles says:

    William and Kate are trying to condition the press and the public to expect FAR less from them than they got from the Queen (and even Charles at this point).

    • Lorelei says:

      @Snuffles, oh, they’ve been doing this for more than a decade. Kate slipped up in 2013 (I think it was 2013?) when she flat-out said she wasn’t going to the St. Patrick’s Day thing because she “didn’t want to create an expectation with the public that she’d do it every year.” And since then, both of them have been doing less and less. We barely even see them now! It’s wild that there’s no backlash to their behavior, especially as they continue to take more luxury vacations and accumulate more homes. Hopefully the press will finally snap at some point and turn on them, because this is beyond ridiculous.

  6. Monika says:

    KP and their patrons Willi and Kate are so dumb to think they can put out a story about Willi and Kate moving house to distract from the other disasters, yacht holiday, summer video and MIA for VJ day. As somebody said they cannot find their way out off a paper bag. This are the same people who thought that it makes the late Queen look good by telling the world that she did not like her granddaughter being named Lilibeth after her. Here we are again trusted Becky English being send out to clean up the mess.

    • jais says:

      I’m not convinced they put this story out to distract from missing VJ Day. They are clowns though so anything is possible. I think the Sun got tipped off and the story was going to come out either way at some point. Maybe Kp did have something to do with it coming out sooner to distract idk. Or yes, they are just idiots. In all this talk about BP though my question is what about WC. If William doesn’t intend to live in WC either then what is it’s purpose? Not that I expect anything William says to be true for more than a moment. It doesn’t matter bc he can essentially do what he wants and be covered for it. It sort of just makes these “exclusives” meaningless bc it’ll just change on a dime anyways.

      • Monika says:

        I think the BM had an idea, some information, somebody watching Kate in the royal furniture warehouse, that a move was on the horizon hence the feverish reporting about Willi and Kate move to Fort Belvedere. The BM was very clearly lied to by KP.

        The Sun broke the story yesterday. I still believe that part of the settlement between Willi and the Sun a few years ago is Willi to provide the Sun with exclusives. Did the Sun force KP to confirm the story and KP obliged thinking it could deflect from other stories? Maybe. The courtiers and their patrons live sometimes in a bubble, not realising how a story might be perceived by the public.

        In regards to WC and the other castles and palaces they probably will be opened to the public. This might backfire and play into the hand of the Republic movement which for long time argue that you do not need a Monarch living in the Palaces or as head of state to attract visitors pointing to Versailles in France attracting millions of visitors every year and we know what happened with their residents.

        Becky said it is Willi’s ‘intention’ to stay in Forest Lodge when he becomes King, so no guarantee.

      • jais says:

        That makes sense. And “intention” is always so carefully placed which just means wiggle room and yeah no guarantee.

    • Me at home says:

      It’s also possible the tabloids are mad about VJ Day, mad about not knowing about the megayacht iand being scooped by the Greek press, and mad about the general laziness. And they’re saying, look what we know about you, what else could we publish?

  7. Dentom says:

    “Forest Lodge is not Grand.” Undercut by the next truth: “Although it is well beyond the means of most families.” In other words, its still a luxury property, arguably Grand.

    • Me at home says:

      Yeah, a mansion with a ballroom is not grand. Sure. Although maybe that’s the room where they’ll install an indoor pool.

  8. Jensa says:

    So relatable.
    Also, “the children can go out cycling for miles and not come anywhere near any of the local residents”. Quite right, we wouldn’t want them to come across the great unwashed.

  9. Mei says:

    I can’t wait for our monarchy to no longer exist lol. what a waste of an obscene amount of money, time and effort for less than nothing.

    This cracked me up though: ‘Prince Edward’s Bagshot Park, which is said to boast between 50 and 120 rooms.’ do they not have a better estimate than give or take 70 rooms?? The size of maybe 11 or 11 normal houses?? Where’s the energy that they have when it comes to scrutinising every element of Meghan and Harry’s living situation (bathrooms!).

    • Jay says:

      Also, wasn’t Bagshot essentially a grace and favour home – leased, not owned, and dependent on the whims of the monarch? So it’s grand, but it’s borrowed finery.

    • jais says:

      All I can think when I hear 50 rooms is how many of those rooms are mostly empty and not in use.

      • Lorelei says:

        The thought of having that many rooms honestly gives me anxiety. I know that obviously these people don’t do their own cleaning or maintenance of any kind, but it just seems so…overwhelming. I’d hate it. Not to mention the wastefulness— how many of these rooms go untouched for decades? These people are just so ridiculous.

      • Mei says:

        Completely agree, a normal-sized family cannot in any way use all those rooms on even a semi-regular basis. Like what, truly, is the need, beyond being able to say ‘we have more rooms than other people’. It’s just pathetic, honestly. Maybe Buckingham Palace (doesn’t it have something like 250 rooms?) if every staff member has a room and an ensuite (unlikely). But then that’s circular argument for having more rooms because you have more staff because you have more rooms to take care of. If there were multiple families of the royals living under one room, fair play. But they all have their own ridiculously massive houses.

      • AMB says:

        I want to know how they’re counting. Does this include walk-in closets that used to be other bedrooms? Anterooms? Hallways that are really wide and have furniture in them?

    • Llama says:

      I mean, same. But also if we are assigning rooms by number of royal duties one actually attends then Edward has probably earned his mini palace… and William would be in a one room shack.

  10. Harla says:

    Oh so this move will cost the taxpayers more due to the need for additional security, that little fact seems to be glossed over quite a bit.

    • IdlesAtCranky says:

      @Harla

      Ding ding ding! That’s what caught my eye too.

      They want PRIVACY and to let the kids BIKE FOR MILES without even SEEING any PEASANTS — to the point that they’ll choose their “forever” (maybe 5 years) “home” (where BullyIdle will rarely set foot) OUTSIDE the established security perimeter at Windsor, thus COSTING THE TAXPAYERS WAY WAY MORE MONEY.

      Yet they have egged the Rota Rats on for… 7 years? 8? to pile endlessly on Harry & Meghan about PRIVACY!!!

      Good grief on toast, these people! The lies, the hypocrisy, the greed, the never-ending insistence on their own privilege and the utter lack of any acknowledgement of duty to the people who are starving, cold, ill-housed if housed at all, lacking medical care … who are still PAYING for these parasites and their every whim.

      I’m beginning to think they’re as bad as Felon47, they just don’t have the power to break as many things.

  11. Libra says:

    How many times have we heard that William “intends to”or is “keen to” do whatever, and that’s the last we hear of it. Peace in the mid East, homelessness, the environment issues (while flying and cruising), all these issues were to be cured because he is keen and intends to act. Now he intends to make this his new forever home (not to be confused with all the other forever homes), once he is king. I won’t hold my breath.

    • Lorelei says:

      Yeah, I believe William is living in Windsor Castle now and has been for years. So all that’s changing here is that Kate got an upgraded separation home.

      The thing is, it’s going to be much harder for them to keep things like this a secret as the children get older. At some point, one of the kids is going to accidentally let it slip. I’m shocked it hasn’t happened already (or at least it hasn’t happened with someone whose parents let it leak). I feel so sorry for those children — think about the number of things their parents must have drilled into them to never, ever talk about? Their lives are not their own; they were born into this sh!tshow — unlike Kate who actively wanted to live in the gilded cage and walked into it with her eyes wide open — and to top it off, they have the most paranoid/secretive parents, far worse than the Queen’s kids ever did. And if we’re correct that W&K are living apart (which I personally think we definitely are!), the children are already absorbing the stress of having separated parents, and they can’t even confide in friends about it like normal people can. They *might* still be young enough that W&K can spin it as normal for the RF, i.e. “Daddy has to travel a lot for work” (lol) or whatever, but at some point, the kids are going to know exactly what’s up.

      Making friends was obviously always going to be challenging for them, since they’ll never know if someone just wants bragging rights, but they likely also have to deal with the additional factor of W&K telling them that they can never trust *anyone*.

      They may be living luxuriously and getting to meet celebrities, etc., but I wouldn’t wish their lives on anyone. And it’s only going to get worse as they get older. W&K will have less and less control over them, and once they reach the age where all of their peers are on social media, it’s going to be disastrous. We can already see the stress weighing on George.

      Anyway, nothing is changing here except Kate (and by extension CarolE) got out of Adelaide, which I think they probably always found embarrassing. William is going to continue to do whateverTF he wants with zero repercussions. Until and unless the press gets fed up with their bullsh!t.

  12. jais says:

    Becky is at least confirming a few details. For example, in regards to the staff, “However, there are ‘five or six’ two- and three-bedroom cottages – currently occupied by estate staff – just a few hundred yards away from the Waleses’ new home. Locals understand these will be occupied by the family’s security detail, housekeeper and nanny after they move in.” 5-6 small cottages is even more than we thought. So staff is living a few hundred yards away. I’m sorry but that’s not enough to boast that you don’t live with staff. Come on. I’m sure it’s nice for the staff to have their own cottages though. And she confirmed that it would come with a significant security cost.

    • AMB says:

      Every time I hear the staff isn’t living in, like it’s some great thing, I just think “what a pain in the a** for the staff to have to put on all that extra mileage”.

  13. Tarte Au Citron says:

    If family comes first, then Billyboy shouldn’t be cheating on the mother of his children.

  14. Tis True Tis True says:

    What the press are ignoring is that all of these solemn celebrations and memorials only exist to be something for the royals to attend. Checked Google and the only US remembrances seem to be at military museums and similar places. Except for Rhode Island, where it’s a state holiday, so they have celebrations in order to keep getting the day off.

    These UK events probably all had some significance, but they largely exist now to be opportunities for shaming the various royals for getting them wrong. I really don’t blame William for ditching them.

    As a staunch anti-monarchist who admits to be fascinated by the whole thing, it seems that the whole point of the exercise is that you are basically stuck with whoever is next in line. And that is William. And he’s horrible and wants the pomp but not the work. So the media has been trying to pretend that’s not true. If they were at all smart, the rota would be saying “why do we need a king who shows up at these sorts of things? Our king is a wealthy man, not a commoner, why should we expect him to live like us?” Honestly, to me the weirdest thing about the whole RF/rota dance is the insistence that these incredibly wealthy and out of touch people are “just like us.” They should just give up the pretense.

    • Me at home says:

      I suppose that if the rota accepted that WanK won’t ever show up in public except for maybe Ascot and Wimbledon, then there would eventually be a serious push to eliminate the Sovereign Grant, reclaim the duchies, and so on. There would probably be intense negotiations about how the royals would be allowed to keep a few palaces plus their private property, but the rest would be returned to the British people. And WanK don’t want that, and the rota parasites who earn their living covering the royals don’t want that. So here we are, pretending they work.

      • Lorelei says:

        What I absolutely don’t understand is why W&K continue to cut out the media more and more — releasing photos and videos themselves on their own SM accounts instead of giving them to the tabloids to run on their front pages, or, for example, tweeting things like their most recent “emotional” (lmao) tweet themselves instead of giving the media a statement to publish — because, as you said, they’re totally dependent on the press to cover for them and pretend their behavior is at all normal or acceptable. Yet they’re giving the media less and less content to work with, which is obviously going to anger them since it affects their bottom line.

        You’d think they’d go out of their way to do what they can to keep the press happy, and it’s such an easy no-brainer to throw them a bone by giving them the children’s annual birthday photos or whatever to publish — but W&K either don’t care, or they’re too stupid to realize what they’re doing.

    • ParkRunMum says:

      this is a reply to @Tis True Tis True — I think the wrinkle in this inter generational saga is that Elizabeth, then Charles, never pretended to be “just like us.” Elizabeth wore the dignity and the gravity of the crown more impressively — with more conviction — not ironically because she was a very disarming, humble and direct person underneath the folderol. But she took the job seriously. She didn’t take herself seriously. Hence she was good at the job. There was none of this fake-it-till-you-make-it-or-until-you-just-give-up vibe that you get with WanK. She didn’t treat her reign like a permanent audition. She meant to do the job, and got to grips with it as best she could, with good humour, and perspective. Charles does go down the odd rabbit hole, albeit organic farming has turned out to be a multibillion pound industry and a compelling strategy for dealing with the food supply amidst ecological crises throughout the world. It’s the one solution that everyone on the planet can embrace — grow your food as close to home as you can. Till your own soil. Cultivate your garden. Talk to your plants. Etc. But Charles biggest liability is also his biggest asset: he cares. He is known to passionately care about the issues he takes on, and goes to lengths that only a fussbudget control freak would, in pursuit of the cause, whatever the cause may be. He is a bit of an egomaniac — ironically as an insecure man, he seeks attention — so the dignity of the crown is not innate to him as it was to his mother. But William…… cannot be arsed to do the bare stinking minimum. He does not care. Not one bit. He will look utterly implausible as king. Like a child playing dress up. Or — shifty. And uncomfortable. Like a man in a costume he resents having to wear. There is a chance he will swell with pride in the moment, and grin from ear to ear and puff his chest out. I think this will strike most people as genuinely off-putting and tone deaf. He will just look pleased with himself, in reaction it will be underwhelming.

      • IdlesAtCranky says:

        @ParkRunMum —

        Interesting, & well-thought-out, analysis.

        I’ve been disgusted with William for years now. And I still am and expect to continue to be.

        But what you wrote makes me wonder if William’s persona & actions as an adult are really the dark mirror image of Harry. Both deeply damaged by Diana’s death and the coldness of their father, especially, and the family as a whole.

        But Harry seems to always have been looking outward, trying to find healing, love, happiness, and a valuable way to live his life, in service to others.

        While William turned inward, into anger and insistence on his own privilege. Into resentment of the role he was born into and the people who demand he fulfill it — yet greed for every perk and prerogative he thinks he deserves.

        The same pain, but utterly opposite ways of dealing with it.

  15. Linney says:

    I still believe William and Kate do not live together. But how can the king and queen (one day) have a “cottage” like Adelaide be their home? This way, it’s easier to push the pretence that they are a happy family. Kate will be at this “forever” home and William will be whereever.

  16. QuiteContrary says:

    LOL, William’s reign is going to be such a clusterf*ck.

  17. Lady Digby says:

    The formula for the SG is set to be discussed in Parliament next year to cover 2027-2032. Current government is looking at austerity measures so any pay rise for RF should not be waved through especially if Will is then King and has ALREADY downed tools. Seriously the gravy train could be derailed by Will ‘s laziness because why pay for no service? The Firm are out of a job and the RR and the tabs aren’t happy at lack of coin. These articles are warning Will to snap out of it and get with the programme. The perks go with the job. He could lose the SG and duchy income if he makes himself surplus to requirements.

    • jais says:

      From what I understand, which is not that much honestly, the SG has been approved to be increased until 2027. But yeah, it should not be increased after that. But isn’t there also a law that the SG can never be decreased, which is wild…would the law then have to be changed if the uk were ever to decrease the SG significantly? I could be getting this wrong though.

      • Lady Digby says:

        Private Eye reported KC3 is worried about Parliament having the right in 2026 to discuss the formula for 5 years from 2027 and that there is already concern about not having the funding available given other priorities. How can you justify an increase if two of your senior royals have become STAY AT HOME ×5 PARENTS and output is reduced?

    • SarahCS says:

      I seem to recall that there was something built into the SG formula that it can’t go down. Unless that was just for the current iteration. At the moment they are getting extra to pay for the BP renovations and that is due to end but I can’t wait to see what comes up when it has to actually be debated.

  18. Over it says:

    Workshy wank doesn’t begin to describe how lazy this man truly is . F-int welfare grifters.

  19. Lady Digby says:

    Hypothetical situation here; if an heir decides that for health reasons he and his wife and family are retiring from public life does he get a restart or indeed any kind of public settlement? Does his dad have to choose to make a settlement on him from his own fortune and/ or make provision in his will?

  20. Mere says:

    I’m curious about the two seemingly conflicting narratives around these two on this site. They seem like buffoons, but do we actually think they are always on vacation together AND that they live separately? I don’t see how that makes sense.

    • SarahCS says:

      I know separated parents who will go on holiday ‘together’ for the sake of small children. Even more so if you’re hiding the fact that the rest of the year you don’t live under the same roof.

    • sevenblue says:

      I heard of even divorced couples doing family vacations together for the children. Also, they use private jets, helicopters like taxis. It isn’t like Will would be stuck. He can fly somewhere else to have fun with his friends and go back later on. Kate seems to invite her parents to the vacations too, so it isn’t like she would be alone.

      The separations rumors made sense, because there is no way Will is living in that small house full time as the heir to the throne. Now, the reporters are saying this will be their family home even when Will becomes the King. That sounds like Will’s plan to put Kate in this new forever home, so he can enjoy all the castles, palaces for himself and his “friends”. Again, no way the King will live in this 8-bedroom house.

    • Lucky Charm says:

      I once worked with a woman who vacationed each summer with her ex-husband and their three children. Because they always did a family vacation while married they continued to do so after the divorce for the kids sake.

  21. Amy Bee says:

    It’s kind of dumb for William to be talking about the sizes of his uncle’s houses when he stands to inherit all royal property including those very houses when he becomes King.

  22. Tessa says:

    Peggs is so not relatable.

  23. jferber says:

    We’re beyond “gently” now.

  24. Krista says:

    Which is it? Prince Edward’s Bagshot Park, which is said to boast between 50 and 120 rooms.
    Slight difference.

  25. blunt talker says:

    I do not know if this story is true but a lot of sites are reporting it-it does not matter to me where he lives- i just know I really love the Sussex house in California-I just wish Will and Kate would slow down until Charles is laid to rest-they seem hell bent on getting him out of the way and getting on what they want to do-Will run the monarchy anyway he feels and there is nothing the UK public can do about it-just take it or lump it.

  26. Wesley says:

    Forest Lodge – no live-in staff, no neighbours, no one to hear or see the fights. Isolate your victims.

  27. Aurelia says:

    I would say Windsor Castle, Buck Palace, St James Palace etc there is enough of them, will all be handed over to the public upon Willie’s accession. They probably will be left with Balmoral Clarence House and chucks personally purchased HighGrove. And Amner Hall which they might flick.

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment