The Duke and Duchess of Sussex are ending 2025 on such an odd note, especially given that this year was enormously positive for them. With Love, Meghan was a success, they negotiated a new first-look contract with Netflix (and announced several upcoming projects under the new contract), Meghan’s As Ever was launched and repeatedly sold out, and they have a much better communications strategy in place. But in recent weeks, they’ve announced an overhaul and rebrand of their foundation and lost two of their most important senior staffers, Meredith Maines and James Holt. What will 2026 bring? Are they completely overhauling everything? Whatever is going on, I have my doubts that Page Six’s claims of “Sussex catastrophe” are accurate. But still, we should talk about this:
As Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s longest-serving staffer prepares to leave — their entire brand is under threat, multiple sources tell Page Six. On Monday, it was announced that James Holt is stepping down as chief of their charity, Archewell.
Now, Page Six can reveal that Holt’s long-time counterpart, Archewell VP Shauna Nep, is not even a full-time employee, but is working on a “consultant” basis. In addition to this, there are just a few employees left on Harry and Markle’s production business — and they could lose more staffers if Markle’s show, “With Love, Meghan,” is not brought back for another season.
“Anyone still there is simply an enabler, enamored with what the couple once was, not who they are today,” claimed one industry source familiar with the Sussexes. “From a year ago, they have decreased their staff by at least 80-85 percent.”
Another person familiar with Archewell added, “They’ve essentially shuttered Archewell.”
As Page Six previously revealed, the Archewell Foundation, which recently rebranded as Archewell Philanthropies, was down to just Holt and Nep. The Sussexes spent the past few months in cost-cutting talks for their charity and even discussed selling the foundation. Holt’s departure follows that of former Archewell senior staffers, Genevieve Roth, Christine Schirmer and Ashley Hansen.
“Every time someone leaves Harry and Meghan say they are staying on in some capacity,” said another source, “But they are never heard from again. Shauna hasn’t been a full-time employee in some time,” added the source, “This is crazy — they have lost their Foundation in a matter of weeks.”
On the production side, the Sussexes still have Chanel Pysnik as head of unscripted, alongside producer Tracy Ryerson. However, the source added, “If Meghan’s Netflix show isn’t picked up for another season then what happens to their staff?”
Over the summer, Harry and Markle also lost their Los Angeles deputy press secretary, Kyle Boulia, and their UK press officer, Charlie Gips. At the time, two additional employees also left the team.
The sourcing on this is so weird. “One industry source familiar with the Sussexes” and a “person familiar with Archewell”??? These are not Hollywood insiders or charitable insiders or Archewell insiders. They are royalist outsiders predicting gloom and doom because they don’t have inside information on what Harry and Meghan are doing. “They’ve essentially shuttered Archewell” – in what way? They’re rebranding it, which means Archewell will no longer be a foundation, so technically, yes, the foundation is being “shuttered”… in service of Archewell Philanthropies. And I don’t buy that Archewell Productions has lost 85% of their staffers either – I think there’s been steady turnover in recent years, but given the recent announcements of upcoming projects, it feels like the production side is well-staffed. As for their philanthropic side, it’s smart to only have a few full-time staffers? You don’t want to spend all of your charity’s money on staff salaries.
Photos courtesy of Backgrid, Cover Images.
- Whistler, CANADA – Meghan Markle, Duchess of Sussex, attends the Whistler Welcome Celebration for the Invictus Games Vancouver Whistler 2025 in Canada. She delivers a heartfelt speech praising Prince Harry’s dedication to the Games and their family. Pictured: Meghan Markle BACKGRID USA 10 FEBRUARY 2025 USA: +1 310 798 9111 / usasales@backgrid.com UK: +44 208 344 2007 / uksales@backgrid.com *UK Clients – Pictures Containing Children Please Pixelate Face Prior To Publication*
- Whistler, CANADA – Meghan Markle, Duchess of Sussex, attends the Whistler Welcome Celebration for the Invictus Games Vancouver Whistler 2025 in Canada. She delivers a heartfelt speech praising Prince Harry’s dedication to the Games and their family. Pictured: Meghan Markle, Prince Harry BACKGRID USA 10 FEBRUARY 2025 USA: +1 310 798 9111 / usasales@backgrid.com UK: +44 208 344 2007 / uksales@backgrid.com *UK Clients – Pictures Containing Children Please Pixelate Face Prior To Publication*
- Whistler, CANADA – Meghan Markle, Duchess of Sussex, attends the Whistler Welcome Celebration for the Invictus Games Vancouver Whistler 2025 in Canada. She delivers a heartfelt speech praising Prince Harry’s dedication to the Games and their family. Pictured: Meghan Markle BACKGRID USA 10 FEBRUARY 2025 USA: +1 310 798 9111 / usasales@backgrid.com UK: +44 208 344 2007 / uksales@backgrid.com *UK Clients – Pictures Containing Children Please Pixelate Face Prior To Publication*
- Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex, Meghan Markle, Duchess of Sussex at the Whistler Welcome Celebration during Invictus Games Vancouver Whistler 2025 . Featuring: Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex and Meghan, Duchess of Sussex Where: Whistler, Canada When: 10 Feb 2025 Credit: Dutch Press Photo/Cover Images **NOT AVAILABLE FOR PUBLICATION IN THE NETHERLANDS OR FRANCE**
- The Duke and Duchess of Sussex attend the Whistler Welcome Celebration during The 2025 Invictus Games Featuring: Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex, Meghan Markle, Duchess of Sussex Where: Vancouver, Canada When: 11 Feb 2025 Credit: INSTARimages
- The Duke and Duchess of Sussex attend the Whistler Welcome Celebration during The 2025 Invictus Games Featuring: Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex, Meghan Markle, Duchess of Sussex Where: Vancouver, Canada When: 11 Feb 2025 Credit: INSTARimages
- The Duke and Duchess of Sussex attend the Whistler Welcome Celebration during The 2025 Invictus Games Featuring: Meghan Markle, Duchess of Sussex Where: Vancouver, Canada When: 11 Feb 2025 Credit: INSTARimages
- Swimming during the 2025 Invictus Games Featuring: Prince Harry Where: Vancouver, Canada When: 14 Feb 2025 Credit: PA Images/INSTARimages **NORTH AMERICA RIGHTS ONLY**
- Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex at the Closing Ceremony of the 2025 Invictus Games at the Rogers Arena Featuring: Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex Where: Vancouver, Canada When: 16 Feb 2025 Credit: Dutch Press Photo/Cover Images **NOT AVAILABLE FOR PUBLICATION IN THE NETHERLANDS OR FRANCE**





















Page 6 is always negative about them
Idiots. Page 6 doesn’t know how many staff the Sussexes had or have. There are a number of productions in the pipeline that we know of (which are not WLM, lol!), Meghan’s acting again, plus As ever has its own business team. And the Archewell Foundation changed to Archewell Philanthropies, which uses a fiscal sponsorship operating model (a different non-profit entity will now run their philanthropic projects for them, basically).
Unfortunately, although I love Meg & Harry, the money they must shell out to maintain their lifestyle, their security, their staff etc must be crazy. They need to work and hard. So I don’t think they’ll have much time for the foundation if they are themselves the pillars of the money coming in, and cant possible pay big shots the money their experience deserve, they hotta let go. They need to be out there and networking and getting more contracts coming because nothing’s gonna be given to them for free. So I do think that there is some trouble ahead, and it’s about money. I think we’re gonna see a lot more of them in 2026.
Prince Harry donated 1.5 million dollars of his own money to children in need to help UK youth. Not sure that means they’re going broke.
Well, if they wanna keep giving… from whatever purse, their own or their foundation, either way, they gotta keep up the work. It’s not good or bad, it’s just life for mostly everyone.
Page Six has been throwing shit against the wall to see what would stick all year. Why even entertain them now?
I hope this doesnt sound terrible but how about they find a way to do charity in a more secondary way. Harry has his better up job and his passion with Invictus and Meghan has found her stride in the lifestyle space. They can still be philanthropic and donate to many causes like the way others seem to, which is to donate or simply write a check to charities but still give priority to their for profit businesses. Not a crime in concentrating on building their wealth first.
Yes, I’ve said from the beginning that their view of themselves as great philanthropists was not realistic given their modest personal wealth. Noble goals— but not realistic ones. They are not living off a small portion of the interest of their wealth and donating the remainder of the interest— they are spending a lot of what they earn just on housing and security.
I wonder if that’s behind the shift. When I think of “Philanthropies” like Ford and Rockefeller Foundation, they’re in the business of giving money and not running non-profits. That seems like a better model for the Sussexes.
Page Six is determined to ruin the lives and reputations of the Black Duchess and her black-adjacent Prince. There will never be peace for the Sussexes, as long as the tabloids have any say.
I’m afraid that you are right, no peace for them whatever they do.
When have PageSix’s doom and gloom predictions about the Sussexes ever been right? Remember when they said WME was dropping Meghan, the articles about how Hollywood hates them(then Meghan was announced to have a cameo in Hollywood movie with A listers days later)? PageSix makes most of their Sussex coverage up because they know it gets clicks. I expect we will have a relaunch of Archewell Philanthropies in the new year!
Exactly. Page Six always predicts the worst with Harry and Meghan. They were doom and gloom when they re negotiated their deal with Netflix. Anyone could be a “source familiar with Archwell”
Look, I LOVE Meghan. But seriously…what is going on? Why is Meredith Maines leaving? Apparently they’ve gone through 11 publicists in the past five years? I work in PR (although not celeb PR), so I kinda understand how and why high-profile people and foundations/corporations often churn through publicists. But on the other hand, for Meghan and Harry to lose such a seasoned, creative and talented publicist is baffling to me.
I’m not bashing Meghan at all. But it’s a little worrying that she can’t seem to keep staffers long term. I temper this concern with an understanding that we don’t have access to the inner workings of her organizations and so there may be valid reasons for all of the staff switch ups.
Looks like it’s time for the ‘I love Meghan but’ concern trolling. Note how it’s always Meghan but never Harry! Have they really ‘gone through 11 publicists in 5 years?’ Can you name all of them? James Holt was one originally then transitioned to running the Foundation. Ashley Hansen left to start her own PR company and wrote very warmly about the Sussexes, she even retained them as a client. There was some restructuring when Meredith joined and two staff members were made redundant because the roles not longer existed. It’s not like 11 people just quit in disgust. Many transitioned to other roles within the organisation. People are so quick to regurgitate tabloid talking points and it’s always Meghan that’s presumed to be at fault…
You know that in those “11 publicists in 5 years” they’re probably counting interns.
Thank you Julia. Whenever I see someone only blaming Meghan ( and never Harry) I know it’s a troll.
❣️
I love that you called out the concern trollling. We have a family member who specalizes in this kind of I say this because I love you stuff. I avoid her.
It’s not 11. They go back past five years to include when they were so called “working royals” and were part of the Wiliieleaks Royal foundation to flub the numbers.
You mean to say you’re not bashing Meghan and Harry—or is it only Meghan? Because it often seems that some people genuinely believe the lies that have been told about her.
For argument’s sake, why is it never suggested that Harry could be the problem? Considering where he came from and the environment he was part of long before meeting Meghan, why is the blame automatically placed on her? When Dominic Reid left the Invictus Games last year, did anyone blame Harry for being difficult to work with, that’s why Domonic left? Of course not.
Meghan had no reputation for being difficult before meeting Harry. She worked for years on Suits without complaints or controversy. Suddenly, after entering the royal system, she’s portrayed as evil, vindictive, and abusive? People don’t fundamentally change overnight. A person’s history—especially a history of service and professional conduct—tells you far more about who they are than a sudden smear campaign ever could.
People need to stop blaming Meghan for everything, particularly for decisions that were clearly made by both her and Harry.
We all know that bashing Meghan makes the RF look better. Page Six is always looking for ways to deny reality and bash Meghan.
Where is this narrative coming from? It’s like when the British press says they’ve lost 25 staff since 2020 when most of the staff that they lost were those the Royal Family refused to absorb into the institution when Harry and Meghan had to close their office after they stepped back. It would be great if you can provide that information.
Yeah. Is there a list of the 11 people who were publicists? I’m not saying there hasn’t been staff changes over the years but it’s a weird number to keep repeating as truth while also remaining vague.
Why is that worrying though? I have worries as most people but my worries are definitely never about someone else’s staff. This is such a non issue to me.
Why is that worrying though? I have worries as most people but my worries are definitely never about someone else’s staff. This is such s non issue to me.
I also used to work in PR/comms consulting and their turnover appears to be pretty high.
I’m wondering though if they’re figuring out that having a whole foundation is a pretty big administrative to do and perhaps they’re shifting to just giving out money to specific projects and other granting organizations to reduce the administrative overhead. Honestly, I wish there was more of that.
I don’t have any experience in the entertainment production world, but perhaps it’s easier and more cost-effective for them to have just a few people who work on contract basis and let Netflix handle the actual producing? I’d be interested to hear what someone with experience in that world thinks.
Who starts with I love Meghan and then I am not trolling is the opposite. A palace troll using the chance to spread lies. Better you try that with the royalists.
Employment in California these days has changed. Most people in the creative fields are freelance.
Same, Quinn. I think there is room for people who honestly love a support Meghan and Harry, and wish the Sussexes the best in everything….but who are also wishing they seemed to flounder less. Any of course, a million commenters will say “you’re not a real fan/I don’t recognize you ever commenting before so you must be a troll/if you were a real Sussex fan you’d never question or worry about them…”
But it does seem like they’re kind of all over the place. And of course they are! Harry and Meghan are basically Royal Family ex-pat guinea pigs at this point. Doing whatever they have to do to make money to support their security. They’re pioneers in this sort of position!
But it just keeps seeming like they’re pursuing one thing, only to pivot. And then pursuing another thing, to pivot again. They’re hiring quiet PR people who don’t punch back, and then finally, a decent PR person who will hit back… and now that person is gone/was let go.
I have tremendous faith that they’ll end up where they want to be, and I believe they’re 100% happier out of the BRF than in it….but they have—and do—flounder a bit. I can’t wait for them to stick the landing, be incredibly successful, and finally have some stability!
The issue I have with yours and Quinn’s comments though is that they’re based on a twisted tabloid narrative that ‘they’re floundering’ when they’re not doing anything that isn’t happening to others. They haven’t actually ‘lost’ 11 publicists and a supporter would know that’s incorrect. There’s never this much scrutiny of other peoples employees so nobody would really know if it is a high staff turnover for someone in their position. I would be interested to know why you think pivoting in business is ‘floundering’. As an owner of multiple businesses myself, I can say that’s really just part of business, to pivot, change a name ( I’ve done that twice ) and even to change industries- which Meghan hasn’t. I’m struggling to see where the excessive pivoting is tbh She’s added products? Changed a brand name? Had to increase production massively to meet demand. With As Ever, I don’t see anything that could be described as floundering at all. With their production company, what has happened? Staff turnover? Pretty normal. If changing Comms team is a sign of disorganisation or failing in some way then a heck of a lot of successful people out there are also in the same boat! Including the RF, the UK government and many many public figures. It isn’t that you can’t criticise them, it’s that this particular criticism seems based on tabloid lies or exaggerations at the very least. It seems strange when someone unfairly focuses on staff turnover of a couple with multiple ventures and then calls themselves supporters, at least to me.
As others have said above, the problem I have with @Quinn’s statement is – “it’s a little worrying that she [Meghan] can’t seem to keep staffers long term.” Why is it just about Meghan? As admitted in the next sentence, “we don’t have access to the inner workings of her organizations”. Why – her – organizations? AFAIK, we don’t have access to the inner workings of anything Harry’s doing either. So why is Meredith Maines – and “all the staff switch ups” – all about Meghan? For one thing, weren’t some of these people who moved on part of production projects both Harry and Meghan were involved in, which were completed?
As far as H&M foundering, I posted my thoughts yesterday, which was, essentially, up until about 2024 they were still on a massive personal and professional learning curve, adjusting to a life completely different from what they expected – with the added burden of figuring out immediately how to keep themselves and their children safe. If they’ve tried a few different things in the past couple of years looking for a reliable income stream (while at the same time forwarding their charitable objectives), I don’t see that as a big surprise – and the end result is what looks like the current significant reorganization of their focus and priorities going forward. They tried a lot of things, not all of them are worth pursing further. And yet, several projects still got awards, or made top ten lists. Let’s see what happens in 2026.
The UK tabloids are notoriously prejudiced. Unless you condemn the negative articles and connect all the dots to the royal family, then you’re branded a troll or fake supporter of Harry and Meghan. It’s best to focus on facts and avoid the subjective nature of tabloid ‘truth’. I’m going to wait and see what the next few months reveal about the direction that Harry and Meghan have decided to take.
The only thing I think that they lost lots of people was for WLM because they are not filming that anymore.
Wasn’t the whole point of moving from the Archewell Foundation to Philanthropies that they could start outsourcing admin and other work on an as-needed basis, cutting costs and adding flexibility?
This is my best guess. Harry and Meghan are not stupid. They are surrounded by people who can give them sound advice, before making decisions. I am trusting the process.
True. And Page 6 doesn’t know how many staff the Sussexes had or have. There are a number of productions in the pipeline that we know of (which are not WLM, lol!), plus As ever has its own business team. The Archewell Foundation changed to Archewell Philanthropies, which uses a fiscal sponsorship operating model (a different non-profit entity will now run their philanthropic projects for them, basically).
Page Six doesn’t know how many staffers have left just like they don’t know how much their Netflix deal is, they just throw random numbers out there hoping something will stick.
Correct. But context is the enemy of made-up scandal don’t you know.
What I am getting from this is that it seems like the Sussexes are pulling back on the film/tv production side of things, which honestly makes sense to me. With the success of As Ever, expanding Archewell, Invictus, and various speaking engagements, they are actually stretched pretty thin. Now that they are no longer tied to their first look deal with Netflix, it seems smart to retool their staff to reflect those circumstances.
Yes it looks like they will still be involved in production but will join forces with others (like the Cookie Queens project).
Not sure about that. Cookie Queens, The Wedding Date, Meet Me At The Lake are just those in the pipeline that we know of. And Meghan has a cameo role in a film, too.
How are they pulling back on tv/film side when they’ve just announced 2 new projects?
I was going to say the same thing. The industry insiders sound like members of the British royal press. I think most of Page Six stories about Harry and Meghan are actually written by the Sun anyway. I think it stands to reason that if the Archewell charity is restructuring that there won’t be a need for most of the staff and I don’t think the staff was that big to begin with. As for the production side, it’s clear that Page Six doesn’t know what’s going on there. The company is dependent on Meghan’s show for work because they’ve just announced 2 new projects and weren’t page six reporting a few weeks ago that Harry was going to do a documentary about Diana so what’s the truth?
“Anyone still there is simply an enabler” a source says. Yeaaaah. Well, that sounds like a legit source right there/s. Look, I don’t know the ins and out of everything but a page 6 article with that kind of sourcing is biased. Whatever the actual reality is, it’s not going to be found accurately portrayed in page 6.
That source sounds like a British rota. What industry person would say that? No one credible.
There was nothing credible about that quote. Working and earning an honest paycheck apparently means someone is an enabler…if they work for the Sussexes. Seriously, wtf. Who says shit like that? So yeah, rota or derangers bc that was messed up.
Does anyone know how many publicists any other organisation/public figure has ‘lost’? Not that the claims are true here about staff loss anyhow. How many has Victoria Beckham had? Anyone know her staff numbers? No. Because only Meghan is being scrutinised- if it was Harry on his own it wouldn’t be reported on like this. People come and go, especially as much of the staff were consultants used for temporary projects or setting them up in new ventures. As far as I can see both of them have had busy successful years, especially with As Ever.
Exactly. A few years ago Kate was churning through them. Not to mention the drama with her recent ex-stylist. Was this reported on?? Absolutely not.
Looking at Archewell’s 990 for last year, it took in about $2.2 million (down from $5.3 million the year before) and salaries were close to $1 million (about the same as the year before). This isn’t sustainable from H&M’s personal wealth. Philanthropy is important to them, so they restructured. Ok.
As for production staff – I don’t know how WLM is organized, but at one time I worked for a small film production company in Boston. The production company staff consisted of the 3 partners and myself. A film project would be a separately incorporated company with its own staffing, which would be disbanded when the project wrapped. Then we were back to 4 people. Did we lose 95% of our staff? No.
I’m pretty sure most of the WLM staff were from Netflix. With just a couple from Archewell, which has always been a small production company. They wouldn’t have hired permanent staff just for WLM, maybe some contractors.
Yes, that’s how things work – the “source” should know that. If WLM isn’t picked up or Meghan doesn’t want to do another season, Archewell Productions will have another project, like the rom-com.
As someone working for an established humanitarian organisation I am much in favor of this decision. Paying 1 Mio in salaries but only awarding ca 150 000 in grants, does not make sense for any foundation. I generally like celebrities to support charitable work in two ways: 1) bring attention to the work of established organizations and the needs of the populations they serve (Angelina Jolie does that superbly) or 2) fundraise or donate to existing organizations (of course Mackenzie Scott is the dream of any humanitarian). Creating foundations or own organisations (hate Sean Penn) almost never makes sense (from a humanitarian point of view, I am sure there are tax benefits etc), unless they do some kind of work that has not been done before (Invictus Games is a good example). Otherwise they just create additional layers of overhead costs and less money goes to the communities. So yes, good that the foundation is dissolved. Wish Royal Foundation would follow their example.
Or they just had too much staff. They’ve reorganized Archewell, had time to figure out their production side of things, and the As Ever side of things. They now know who and what they need and are staffing accordingly.
Maines was mainly brought in to oversee the launch of WLM and As Ever. One of those is over, and the other is up and running. Job done. Archewell is changing to a different style of operating to reduce stress and overhead. All of this involves losing staff. Framing it this way is just another attempt to make the black woman look bad. Notice Harry is never the issue.
That’s exactly what it appears to be, at this point.
I wondered if her role was always supposed to wind down by year-end.
How does one “sell” a charity? Is that even possible?
No, it’s not possible. But the assets can be assigned to another charity.
I doubt it because who would buy a non profit and for what reason? They were probably just looking at different funding models because unlike the royal foundations Archewell needs to be completely self funded.
Yeah didn’t understand that, but yes, u can have another non-profit do the grant making with the archewell $ so that archwell doesn’t have that headache though they still control who gets the grants, along with the terms. I think that’s a good move.
I worked for years at Carnegie corporation of ny and one year we did grant making for Bloomberg. It was a one- off.
Charities usually make a plan to distribute the corpus of funds and shut down — they don’t get sold.
I believe in the Sussexes and only the Sussexes know what their end game is. The usual negative Nelly’s are selling their negative nonsense. Growth and change are part of any organization. Excited for what is to come from them.
They have reduced the number of employees by 1043%.
The fact that it’s only tabloids talking about this and it’s all from sources that sound suspect is probably enough evidence it’s all nonsense. All the serious outlets that reported on James Holt’s departure kept their reporting mostly factual and didn’t speculate.
i trust Meghan and Harry (and their advisors) to make sound decisions based on the data and information they have, for their personal, professional and philanthropic lives.
Royal commentators are like psychics, they spew a lot of nonsense hoping that every now and then they get something right.
She is doing what all successful people do. Namely trying a lot of things and seeing what works and what doesn’t, and cutting her losses for things that don’t quite pan out. Unfortunately, she has to do this on a world stage, with the tabloids breathing down her neck.
If any of her critics have done anything as impressive as her As Ever drops, I would like to hear about it.
This! A lot of notable people have started and abandoned projects and it never gets this much scrutiny. The thing is they are never going to have a single desk job and just sit on a board or two. Neither of them are like that. They will constantly try new things and approaches, whether for financial, philanthropic or creative reasons. I wouldn’t necessarily say they’re restless but very curious, and experimental. Some things seem to be settling and hitting their stride like Invictus and even producing, while they are trying to restructure their philanthropic arm and play PR whack a mole with the tabloids and British Press. I think they will try to protect what they have built after what happened with Sentebale and the attempt to use Meghan’s dad to sabotage her with his latest health problems. Everything is amplified and dramatized. I think some changes have definitely been in the works. Everything is always timed after the fact.
I want to know if Taylor Swift or anyone else has the linked in profiles of their employees monitored as the Uk tabloids do for the Sussexes.
Let Page 6 panic for the Sussexes while they just continue with their business. In the grs d scheme of things, if they narrow their focus, restructure or decide to completely change their approach, they’re doing it for a reason. It would be good to have some quiet on this perceived constant churn.
As non working royals they are under no obligation to do charity at all. If they decided to just focus on highlighting good causes that would be fine. However, they obviously enjoy the philanthropy aspect of their work so I’m sure they will always do it in some capacity. I’ve looked at the Archewell accounts and while it seems they could do with cutting admin and staffing costs the charity has a balance of over £8 million so this weird concern trolling by PageSix is just silly.
It IS a lot of turnover but I don’t think it’s that uncommon for start-ups to go through different iterations. They are trying to figure out what they want to do. Their security costs are enormous and maybe they stretched themselves to thin with all the staff.
IT doesn’t mean anyone is a monster.
What’s the opposite of fan fiction? Foe fiction maybe? That’s what this is.
They are including Holt who isn’t leaving but changing roles.
Page six isn’t an industry paper. They are Murdoch owned regurgitating UK tabloid tripe.
It’s interesting how the tabloids never know who is leaving, or when they’re leaving – only after the story breaks do they suddenly claim they had “sources” telling them bs.
If this is true I think it’s great news. I really don’t understand their desire to be philanthropists, to be seen as charitable, to be giving back — blah blah blah.
What’s wrong with living a leisurely life? Why is it problematic to simply enjoy being rich and spending quality time with your children?
Maybe Harry feels compelled to do that because of his heritage and his mother but I don’t understand why Megan would need to fulfill that kind of duty. I mean, she was just a working actress before Harry. Would she be trying to “make a difference in the world” if she’d married another actor?
Meghan has been an activist since childhood and an advocate for female empowerment since childhood. She had high profile events since before Harry. Marrying Harry raised her profile, allowing her to do even more work.
I think the financials do not reveal all of the work that Meghan and Harry do philanthropically. I don’t think that parceling out money is their major goal, since they are not in the Gates or Buffet arena. Their leadership, and their work in founding, or helping founding of active organizations is the more impactful part of their work. I think what they give to organizations is the smaller part of their work.
I mean Meghan was volunteering at soup kitchens when she was 13 & kept up volunteering & being a charity ambassador & a UN women’s advocate as an actress. Her father is awful but Meghan said he & her mother encouraged her in giving back so think it’s inherent & Harry has said that he finds public service rewarding. And I think it’s important to them after the royal family tried to act like they had ownership of public service.
Seems like usual catastrophising when it comes to H&M. If they aren’t attached at the hips they must be divorcing (yawn). It just sounds like Archewell’s charity is moving to a leaner model which requires less staff. I agree with others who say it’s good as hopefully with less admin & overheads it means more money actually going to charities & the communities that need it.
On comms I agree it’s a shame Meredith is going as I think she did a great job & thought she was doing better at pushing back on stories. there were stories that were pushed back on that I’m pretty sure a more relaxed Ashley might have agreed with her clients to let go (from that podcast she did I do think Ashley had decided there was only so much she could do & for her mental health to pick her battles which I can’t blame her for) but I think it’s been good for there to have been more pushback & especially for some of these royal authors not to get too comfortable with being able to lie freely about Harry & Meghan.
But as I mentioned before the smears & demands for press responses are unrelenting so I hope they find a team they can trust & can build a long term relationship with & that the approach Meredith started continues. I also hope to see much more promotion of their content projects going forward.
And? Whatever is going down or not going down, ALL of this is part of the real world and being financially independent whilst paying for your own security while there’s credible terrorist threats against you. They gotta do what they gotta do. They aren’t slum lording or accepting garbage bags of cash while living on tax payers’ dime. Organizations, foundations, businesses, etc. have to make difficult decisions sometimes. What did you think their financial independence would entail? Oh right, Harry crawling back to Charles broken and divorced. So because that hasn’t happened, any common occurrence that comes with the territory must be blown up as a cautionary tail for anyone else thinking of creating a rival court in America. Page 6 must have gotten one of those garbage bags full of cash!
These tabloids keep trying to drag the Sussexes down, even if they have to resort to lying to ruin their reputations — which could have a negative effect on their buisnesses. In America, we have a tort called “interference with business relations.” I hope someone is looking into that.
AFAIK, you can‘t Sell a non-Profit foundation; so why should Meghan and Harry consider it? So, this Information isn‘t coming from insiders. It‘s just making up stuff.
My goodness, Like which company isn’t moving things around and strategizing in 2026. Even trillion dollar companies are making big changes and evolving to this new world. 🤦♀️
There’s a news story the other day on the BBC as more younger people are leaving the UK that may be creating a future brain drain in that country – they should fix their own issues over there instead of distracting their own issues on HM.
Harry has stated that his life is dedicated to service. Meghan lives a creative life and a life of philanthropy. Before she married Harry, she lived a life that balanced the two, each part enhancing the other. Harry indicated at some conference, I can’t remember which, that he does not intend to found any more new initiatives or organizations, and is changing gears, one of them being business related initiatives in service of current major issues. If you are someone who expected Harry and Meghan to have a fully developed road map that they are following, you will be “disappointed” in them, I’m sure. They seem very attuned to current issues and act in service to them, covid vaccines and internet safety to name two. More than anything, they live in the real world unlike Harry’s relative who are trying to make an antiquated system to prosper in the modern world. That’s the reason the left-behinds seem to live unfulfilling lives. Purposeful change and correcting or changing course is good and necessary. It does not mean you’re flighty, disorganized, directionless, unproductive, or failing.
If Archewell wants to maintain their 4 star rating on Charity Navigator, then they don’t want to spend too much on running their charity in relation to their donations. That may be why they are cutting staff. They also may be refocusing from fund raising to producing their new movie “The Wedding Date” and they have a young family to support for the future so it makes sense that is their priority now.
THE WORD FOR ALL OF THIS IS CALLED FREELANCING-LOOK UP THE MEANING AND IT EXPLAINS A LOT=A PERSON WORKS FOR SOMEONE ON SOMETHING PARTICULAR AND THEN MOVES ON TO SOMETHING ELSE OR SOMEONE ELSE-HARRY AND MEGHAN I AM SURE HAVE LEARNED ALOT ABOUT SETTING UP AND DEVELOPING A BUSINESS MODEL-FREELANCING IN HOLLYWOOD IS A DAILY COMMODITY-WORKING HERE AND THERE IS WHAT FREELANCERS DO. KEEP YOUR POWDER DRY.
I think with As Ever being more successful more quickly than they expected Meghan is pulling back from a lot of things and focusing on the brand(she already admitted this is why she put her podcast on hold). I think they’re trying to be less micro-managy when it comes to Archewell both on the production side and on the charitable and just lead the vision and not be as involved in the day to day and use more consultants to get the work done with less overhead costs.
From an organizational standpoint point it makes sense but I do hope they didn’t actually lay off a bunch of people right before the holidays. It doesn’t matter the reason that’s pretty crappy to do and while i obviously like them im not going to be a hypocrite and say I think thats OK just because it’s them.