Ex-Prince Andrew seen in photos with ‘young women’ at Jeffrey Epstein’s house

The Department of Justice has continued to release various caches of documents and photos from the Epstein Files since the big release in late January. That’s how “new” photos and emails keep making news, especially in the British press. Well, over the weekend, the Telegraph published two photos of Prince Andrew, believed to be taken in 2010 in New York, when Andrew was staying at Jeffrey Epstein’s townhouse. For years and years, we’ve heard about the horrible things that went down at that townhouse, and now it appears that Andrew was regularly posing for photos with the very young women – if not outright girls – while he stayed with Epstein.

A photograph that appears to show Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor with a young woman on his lap has been published by the US Department of Justice (DoJ). A man wearing a blue shirt and grey hooded jacket with his arms around a blonde woman appears to resemble the former Duke of York.

A second photograph uncovered by The Telegraph shows the same man, this time with a different young woman standing behind him, her arms wrapped around his neck. Both women’s faces have been redacted.

The two pictures, which are small and low-resolution, appear to have been taken in the New York dining room of Jeffrey Epstein, the paedophile and financier who died in 2019. The undated images are among the 180,000 photographs released by the DoJ under the Epstein Files Transparency Act.

Mr Mountbatten-Windsor is known to have visited Epstein’s Manhattan property for a week-long stay in December 2010. The disgraced prince claimed in a 2019 Newsnight interview that he only made the trip because he was “too honourable” not to say goodbye to the convicted paedophile in person. However, correspondence and other documents disclosed by the DoJ show the pair spent the trip socialising and remained in contact afterwards.

One photograph, which shows Mr Mountbatten-Windsor on all fours leaning over a young woman, appears to have been taken in the same dining room of Epstein’s New York home during the 2010 trip.

[From The Telegraph]

I remember the lies Andrew told about that 2010 visit to New York. In his 2019 Newsnight interview, Andrew claimed that he went to New York to break up with Epstein as a friend. When Emily Maitlis pressed him on why a friendship-breakup needed to be a week-long thing involving parties and walks in the park, Andrew claimed it was because he was such a gentleman, and he needed to break up with Epstein in person. It’s looking more and more like this 2010 visit was just any other week in Epstein and Andrew’s relationship, with Epstein providing/trafficking girls to Andrew. Maybe Epstein knew that this would probably be one of their final weeks together, and that’s why Epstein seemingly organized all of these photos/kompromat.

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

16 Responses to “Ex-Prince Andrew seen in photos with ‘young women’ at Jeffrey Epstein’s house”

  1. Hypocrisy says:

    all this is just a small fraction of the evidence that just sat there for years and is still hidden..and if you believe this human trafficking ring ended with Epstein’s death you are lying to yourself.. these people are sick and beyond redemption.

  2. Wish they would stop white washing it by saying young women!! Children! It’s children!!!!!! My oldest daughter developed a healthy set of boobs at 11. She was still a CHILD!!

    • Jas says:

      Yes! I hate all these minimising phrases. These ghouls weren’t having sex with underage women, they were raping children. I don’t understand why the media are so coy and mealy mouthed about it.

    • kelleybelle says:

      Exactly, they’re not “young women.” That’s whitewashing. They’re kids.

    • Nuks says:

      They do it because they don’t want to offend the men out there who are jealous and who want to have sex with girls. Calling them underage women is a wink wink. It puts the perpetrator’s relationship to the child as the primary frame, instead of the child’s actual identity. The child is a child. She’s only underage to someone who wants to have sex with a child.

      At least say teenager for God’s sake. That would be a step forward.

  3. Jais says:

    Stomach-turning.

  4. Bumblebee says:

    The body language of those GIRLS says it all!

  5. Ocho says:

    If the Dept of Justice knows the ages of any blacked-out girls/women in photos they release, I wish they would state their ages. I want accurate info, while preserving the anonymity of the girls/women. For some reason, newspapers keep calling them “young women” when they look more like girls to me. It is easy for the men to hide behind these misstatements and ambiguity. And as a viewer, I may misinterpret the photos to find someone guiltier or less guilty than they actually are. Facts and context would be helpful.

    Have Giuffre’s two interviews by the FBI been released? She gave them the full list of men she had been trafficked to (according to her ghostwriter).

  6. Brassy Rebel says:

    If it wasn’t so tragic, it would be funny that this creep thought he could say he spent that week in Epstein’s house just so he could tell him he was a disgusting pedo who AMW was never going to see again. The long good bye I guess. May this degenerate liar never know a moment’s peace.

  7. QuiteContrary says:

    Andrew is so disgusting. He absolutely should be forced to spill everything he knows.

  8. Amy Bee says:

    Let’s not forget that the Telegraph was the paper that had tried its hardest to prove Virginia Guiffre was lying about Andrew. Even here they refuse to say outright that it’s Andrew in these new photos.

    • kelleybelle says:

      Camilla Tominey sure deleted that photo of her yukking it up with Andrew on her Twitter page pretty quickly, didn’t she? Nasty woman.

      Tominey/The Telegraph was also the first tabloid to cr*p all over Meghan’s Hubb Kitchen project. She’s as evil as all the rest in that viper’s nest.

  9. KellySays says:

    I LOVE that they will continue to dribble these out. As soon as one dies down – Oh Wait! There’s MORE! This will have to exhaust even the most experienced PR/crisis management team.

  10. Chaine says:

    Just sickening. The body language of that girl tells us she is trapped and trying to get away.

  11. NoBS Please says:

    Shocking photos of child abuse by a member of the British royal family, who was then protected by said royal family for years.

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment