This coming autumn will be the ten-year anniversary of then-Meghan Markle being publicly identified as Prince Harry’s girlfriend. In ten years, British reporters, British royalists and British royal biographers and commentators have been incapable of being normal about Meghan. Ten solid years of the most vile racism, misogyny, bigotry, stupidity and lies, all directed at an American woman who dared to fall in love, move back to California and survive their onslaught. Well, today would have been Queen Elizabeth II’s 100th birthday, and those same royalists have obviously made the dead queen’s birthday into some kind of referendum on Meghan and Harry (mostly Meghan). Robert Hardman, who wrote one of the bajillion QEII biographies out this year, recently spoke about how Queen Elizabeth obviously thought that Meghan was a “narcissist.”
Queen Elizabeth II “detected narcissistic behavior on the part of Meghan” Markle after efforts to set the duchess up for success were “torn up,” insiders told royal author Robert Hardman. In his new book Elizabeth II, Hardman quoted a source who described the relationship between the monarch and Meghan, saying: “The Queen had seen plenty of narcissists in her life.”
And on Newsweek’s The Royal Report podcast Hardman went into greater detail about his sourcing for the extraordinary account: “A lot of people around the queen thought the queen thought Megan was, by the end, showing narcissistic tendencies.”
Hardman told Newsweek’s The Royal Report podcast “the queen was famously good at concealing her true thoughts” but added that Elizabeth’s inner circle became convinced the monarch believed Meghan exhibited narcissistic traits after attempts to set her up for royal success failed. He cited the care with which the queen gave her new granddaughter-in-law meaningful patronages that she thought would matter to Meghan, including with the National Theatre, playing off her past career as an actress.
Hardman said these efforts “were initially embraced by the [Sussexes] and then just sort of torn up…It was at first baffling, then frustrating, and then ultimately, in the end, those around the queen felt that she felt she had been let down by both of them but certainly detected narcissistic behavior on the part of Meghan.”
Elizabeth’s reported belief in Meghan’s narcissistic tendencies did not develop until “after things had blown up,” Hardman said.
“Early on she was actually delighted [with Meghan]. Don’t forget the queen was sort of bending all the rules to welcome Meghan into the fold,” he said. “You used to not take your girlfriend or even then-fiancee to stay at royal events until you were married and all this sort of thing. Those sort of rules went out of the window.”
The relevant passage in Hardman’s book comes after he discusses Harry and Meghan’s March 2021 Oprah Winfrey interview, in which Meghan said an unnamed royal had expressed “concerns and conversations” about how dark her unborn child’s skin might be before he was born. And the book suggests some in the palace felt Meghan’s choice of interviewer indicated she had been planning to speak out for years, citing the fact Oprah was a guest at the couple’s wedding.
“The business of having Oprah at the wedding now made sense,” said one senior aide. “The Queen had initially been very sympathetic to Meghan and her family problems. I think she saw similarities between Meghan and the young Philip and his chaotic family. But it was now starting to look like the move to California had been a plan all along.”
The source added: “The Queen had seen plenty of narcissists in her life.”
If Meghan has been a narcissist in the past decade, she has certainly been doing narcissism the wrong way. She put herself in the hands of people she thought she could trust, and they constantly undermined her and smeared her at every step. A narcissist would have had more self-preservation and demanded more control. Meghan was driven to suicidal ideation because of the palace and press working hand-in-hand to abuse her – a narcissist would have handled that situation much differently. To this day, Meghan just lives her life mostly out of the spotlight while people like Robert Hardman obsessively track her every move – people being singularly obsessed with her doesn’t make HER self-obsessed. I’d also like to point out that there’s a difference between someone who is centered and someone who is self-centered. Meghan is the former – she’s always been a centered person, which helped her survive. She knows who she is, her priorities are in order, she’s not a style-stalking, copykeening idiot.
Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, Cover Images.
- (170118) — DAVOS, Jan. 18, 2017 () — U.S. Vice President Joe Biden speaks at the 47th Annual Meeting of the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos, Switzerland, on Jan. 18, 2017.(/Xu Jinquan)(gl)
- Prince Harry looks at his bride, Meghan Markle, as she arrives accompanied by the Prince of Wales in St George’s Chapel at Windsor Castle for their wedding.,Image: 515241830, License: Rights-managed, Restrictions: NO UK USE FOR SEVEN DAYS – Fee Payable Upon Reproduction – For queries contact Avalon.red – sales@avalon.red London: +44 (0) 20 7421 6000 Los Angeles: +1 (310) 822 0419 Berlin: +49 (0) 30 76 212 251 Madrid: +34 91 533 4289, *** NO UK USE FOR 48 HRS ***, Model Release: no, Credit line: /Avalon
- Meghan Markle in St George’s Chapel, Windsor Castle for her wedding to Prince Harry watched by (middle row from left) Queen Elizabeth II, Duke of Edinburgh, Earl of Wessex, Viscount Severn, Countess of Wessex, Lady Louise Mountbatten-Windsor, Princess Royal, Sir Tim Laurence, (front row from left) Duke of Cambridge, Prince of Wales, Duchess of Cornwall Duchess of Cambridge, Duke of York. .,Image: 515241949, License: Rights-managed, Restrictions: NO UK USE FOR SEVEN DAYS – Fee Payable Upon Reproduction – For queries contact Avalon.red – sales@avalon.red London: +44 (0) 20 7421 6000 Los Angeles: +1 (310) 822 0419 Berlin: +49 (0) 30 76 212 251 Madrid: +34 91 533 4289, Model Release: no, Credit line: – / Avalon
- Prince Harry and Meghan Markle leave St George’s Chapel at Windsor Castle after their wedding.,Image: 515242352, License: Rights-managed, Restrictions: NO UK USE FOR SEVEN DAYS – Fee Payable Upon Reproduction – For queries contact Avalon.red – sales@avalon.red London: +44 (0) 20 7421 6000 Los Angeles: +1 (310) 822 0419 Berlin: +49 (0) 30 76 212 251 Madrid: +34 91 533 4289, *** NO UK USE FOR 48 HRS ***, Model Release: no, Credit line: /Avalon
- Prince Harry and Meghan Markle attend an event at Millennium Point to celebrate International Women’s Day in Birmingham on 8th March 2018,Image: 534151125, License: Rights-managed, Restrictions: NO UK USE FOR SEVEN DAYS – Fee Payable Upon Reproduction – For queries contact Avalon.red – sales@avalon.red London: +44 (0) 20 7421 6000 Los Angeles: +1 (310) 822 0419 Berlin: +49 (0) 30 76 212 251 Madrid: +34 91 533 4289, Model Release: no, Credit line: – / Avalon
- PEACEHAVEN, UNITED KINGDOM – OCTOBER 03: Meghan, Duchess of Sussex makes an official visit to the Joff Youth Centre in Peacehaven, Sussex on October 3, 2018 in Peacehaven, United Kingdom. The Duke and Duchess married on May 19th 2018 in Windsor and were conferred The Duke & Duchess of Sussex by The Queen.,Image: 534178843, License: Rights-managed, Restrictions: NO UK USE FOR SEVEN DAYS – Fee Payable Upon Reproduction – For queries contact Avalon.red – sales@avalon.red London: +44 (0) 20 7421 6000 Los Angeles: +1 (310) 822 0419 Berlin: +49 (0) 30 76 212 251 Madrid: +34 91 533 4289, Model Release: no, Credit line: – / Avalon
- No use after 24 January 2021 without the prior written consent of The Communications Secretary to The Queen at Buckingham Palace. Queen Elizabeth II records her annual Christmas broadcast in Windsor Castle, Berkshire.,Image: 578787598, License: Rights-managed, Restrictions: , Model Release: no, Credit line: Victoria Jones / Avalon
- NEWS EDITORIAL USE ONLY. NO COMMERCIAL USE. NO MERCHANDISING, ADVERTISING, SOUVENIRS, MEMORABILIA or COLOURABLY SIMILAR. NOT FOR USE AFTER 31 DECEMBER 2018 WITHOUT PRIOR PERMISSION FROM KENSINGTON PALACE. NO CROPPING. Publications are asked to credit the photograph to Alexi Lubomirski. The photograph must not be digitally enhanced, manipulated or modified in any manner or form and must include all of the individuals in the photograph when published. This official wedding photograph released by the Duke and Duchess of Sussex shows The Duke and Duchess in The Green Drawing Room, Windsor Castle, with (left-to-right): Back row: Master Jasper Dyer, the Duchess of Cornwall, the Prince of Wales, Ms. Doria Ragland, The Duke of Cambridge; middle row: Master Brian Mulroney, the Duke of Edinburgh, Queen Elizabeth II, the Duchess of Cambridge, Princess Charlotte, Prince George, Miss Rylan Litt, Master John Mulroney; Front row: Miss Ivy Mulroney, Miss Florence van Cutsem, Miss Zalie Warren, Miss Remi Litt.
- Queen Elizabeth II looks on during the wedding of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle in St George’s Chapel at Windsor Castle.






















Another seance? This is getting really out of control. Did the Queen study psychology in the afterlife?
LOL this. Did she treat Meghan?
Even if this was Queen Elizabeth’s true opinion, an older woman finding a younger woman narcissistic isn’t automatically some kind of gotcha. For centuries women have been groomed to not only be submissive and traditional themselves, but to demonize women who are the opposite of those things. Many have a hard time seeing younger people be assertive about things that were just accepted or swept under the rug when they were young. One hard truth we have to accept about ourselves in order to grow is that sometimes our negative perception of another woman is caused by our own internalized misogyny. Add race into the mix, and it gets even more complicated. There are things Elizabeth as a White woman would not have had to have worried about.
This! It was probably as simple as Meghan wanting to protect herself.
Much more intelligently stated than I would have done.
“Another seance?” OMG I CHOKED
LMAO! I was just thinking she’s gotten awfully chatty of late. Can you imagine how PO’d you’d be if you spent 96 years on this mortal coil and they won’t let a woman friggin’ rest?
@Tessa I am having the worst day and this just made me laugh so hard, so thank you
So the Queen made all these observations about Meghan who she barely spent any time with but didn’t see anything wrong with Andrew? Also, once again people are projecting what they think on the Queen. Amazing how all these people know what a dead woman thought when she would have never shared those thoughts with them.
I wanted to ask same question- did she attempt to diagnose the rest of her family? Could be interesting, I would start with the current heir.
The whole of the Windsor/Whales family exhibit narcissistic traits, including their Queen. Sounds like projection to me. Never heard of a dead person speaking as much as this dead woman
Yeah, and I don’t think it was Meghan who went around giving away pictures of herself as if it’s some kind of precious gift.
Yes, keep using the old lady to attack a WOC and keep silent about her degenerate son. That will surely help the monarchy. Phillip wasn’t lying when he said the monarchists/press would be the monarchy’s downfall because these fools don’t realize they aren’t doing this family any favors.
And did the Queen also mention the rest of her family are full of predators,narcissists,sociopaths,grifters,adulterer or only Meghan with character flaws?
And did the Queen get concerned that Scooter attacked his brother?
And if Elizabeth was such an expert at reading people, then she would have seen what her blood relatives were *really* like. Which means she approved of all that.
I don’t think the Queen used “psychobabble” terms. Hardman should be ashamed of himself.
They are so pissed about no control of Meg that they dug up the queen to try to hurt her! What a very sick jerk!!!
The late Queen knew full well who the narcissist was, & it wasn’t Meghan.
hahaha. the queen’s favorite son is the ultimate narcissist. all this nonsense at meghan just to avoid talking about andrew and his many many alleged crimes. or to investigate who is paying for fergie’s austrian retreat. is it charles?
A narcissist to the royals is a woman who doesn’t grovel for crumbs from their table. See Meghan, Diana
Not a narcissist is any woman who is so desperate for their approval she’s willing to be broken and turned into a living doll with no agency, no power, no personality, no ambition, and no voice. See Kate.
The royals in 2026 can’t handle women with any sense of personal identity. That’s what all these crazy ratchets are really saying. When people tell you who they are, believe them. They expect women to be Handmaids and Stepford Wives. It wouldn’t surprise me at all to learn that Kate ran on batteries.
👏👏👏👏👏
Exactly, lanne. Though someone might want to replace Kate’s batteries.
🎯
So they observed the queen and just assumed her inner thoughts which were that Meghan was narcissistic. Convenient.
I’m surprised the tabloids don’t have mind readers on the payroll along with the body language and lip reading experts truthfully..
Especially a mind reader who can read the mind of a dead person.
Jais, I commented something similiar below. I did not see your comment. It is not anymore about what the late Queen allegdedly told cousin Lady Eliza and told it to a journalist, royal commentator/biographer. We are now in the territory of mindreading and telepathy. As Hypocrisy said they might start using mindreaders in the future. It is hilarious how a so called journalist/biographer spins a story about what the late Queen’s “inner circle” thought the late Queen thought.
I am wondering what the inner circle thought what the late Queen thought about her son Andrew. Robert Hardman might enlighten us.
Right??? its like even Hardman knows he can’t cross that line and say that QEII actually SAID that. But her close circle “sensed” that.
I’m actually not sure the late queen would have recognized a narcissist when she saw one anyway. Her whole family is full of them. The late queen probably had some narcissistic tendencies herself.
Meghan’s issue wasn’t being a “narcissist,” it was that she said “I deserve better” and Harry agreed with her.
Who knows if the Queen even knew what narcissism was…it’s obviously been talked about a LOT more since 2016, and now people throw the term around on a daily basis. But she was already so elderly by then. I mean, I’m sure she’d heard the word, but I highly doubt she armchair-diagnosed Meghan with it
That’s what jumped out at me. “Elizabeth’s inner circle became convinced the monarch believed Meghan exhibited narcissistic traits….”
That’s a big ball of “I got nothing, so I’m going to make something up.”
Meghan’s the narcissist but you’re spending your longest reigning monarchs 100th birthday talking about her. Okay.
I think of the wildest part to me is how willing they are to basically ruin the Queen’s reputation, as that may be, just to get in digs at Meghan. She’s on their mind so much that they have to retcon reality to explain why they were right to mistreat and malign her.
It always comes back to the same question though. If she’s so terrible, didn’t understand what the job was, was a raging bully and narcissist, why are they still writing about her daily? Any other company if you have an employee like that that left you’d be kicking up your heels that they were gone, and wouldn’t be thinking about them again. Except but to think occasionally man I’m happy they’re’s someone else’s problem.
They’re so intrigued by her but don’t want to admit it. Meghan is not the others. Shes not cowed by them. She walked away with her dignity. She ignores them and doesn’t give her critics the time of day. That makes them angry. They don’t have nothing to hold over her. Shes not running to be accepted. Meghan broke these people by not engaging. Meghan has self respect and I think they have no idea on how to accept or handle that.
BIG SIGH. Doctor Ramani did the world a disservice by popularizing the discussion of narcissism. She had people in a grip during the pandemic. Happy she’s finally falling off.
If you actually look at the traits of narcissism, Charles, Andrew and William all show signs (based on their public personas) of NPD, but we are not qualified to diagnose them.
The term has been co-opted by misogynists on both sides and homophobes/transphobes.
It’s incredibly frustrating. I loathe it when people pull out the term. Just because someone treats you badly, or you don’t like the person, it doesn’t make them a narcissist.
I remember it well. The two sites I checked on from time to time, Love something whatever, the one that kept changing hands (ok not so well) and Royal Foibles (kept begging for money). It started with “we like her.” And with time the word “narcissistic” showed up. The Lol site had a commenter who loathed Markle. Loathed. Kept using a black spider emoji when she commented on MM. It was very Lord of the Flies. I stopped reading Lolwhatever it was titled. Royal Foibles disappeared somewhere who knows. Yes “narcissistic” was often bandied about.
This is actually very hilarious.
“A lot of people around the Queen thought the Queen thought Meghan…..”
“Elizabeth inner circle became convinced that the monarch believed Meghan…..”
So the late Queen did not say anything to her inner circle about this but her inner circle believed anyway the late Queen believed Meghan …(fill in the blank). LMAO.
This👆 – They thought she thought. So she never told anyone this…
These people are so ridiculous. The people who read the drivel and believe it are just as bad.
It’s like a telepathic game of telephone.
😄
Totally ridiculous. “Elizabeth’s inner circle became convinced the monarch believed Meghan exhibited narcissistic traits….”
That’s a big ball of “I got nothing, so I’m going to make something up.”
I’m scratching my head over the mechanics of this. How could they believe she believed something? How does one exhibit that they think someone is a narcissist? What action, what facial expression, what clothing item she wore, what–? Because unless she outright said ‘I believe Meghan is exhibiting signs of narcissism’, they can’t know what the queen thought about her.
I don’t know – thinking you’ve been anointed by God to rule over an empire seems pretty narcissistic to me.
Indeed, Eurydice!
Branding or diagnosing somebody a narcissist has been a social media construct lately. It is used by online pseudo psychologist as engagement farming. Everybody is made to believe that, that one person who hurt them is a narcissist and it is all that person’s fault. It is soothing to believe this, I won’t lie. But Queen Elizabeth is not from a generation of online psycho jargon. It is like saying QE loved saying 6-7!
Yep. Members of certain oppressed groups don’t even have to be the person who hurt someone to be labelled as narcissists- they just have to stand up for themselves, stand up for others, or not conform to traditional values enough for someone else. It’s ridiculous and it’s a form of emotional manipulation and punching down.
Are we certain the woman could spell narcissist, let alone identify those traits in Meghan?
She certainly missed them in her own offspring
Well we know for sure the Queen raised four entitled narcissists with anger issues.. it’s all well documented.. along with her two oldest sons love of befriending predators or being the predator themselves.. but let’s ignore all that and label Meghan one from the grave.. Meghan is a text book ♌️ Leo she is not a narcissist by any definition.
All these articles about how the Queen hated Meghan this, distrusted her that, was distressed by her behaviour xyz etc etc are just making people think QE2 was a slimy two-faced hypocrite.
They are so eager to use her to fit their anti-Meghan narrative that they don’t seem to realise they are damaging her reputation.
That, along with her knowingly supporting her paedophile son, isn’t going to help her legacy.
The blog I used to follow, the one that kept changing hands that over time became a We Hate Narcissistic Meghan site. It started off with “we like her” but then they didn’t. One commenter always used a black widow spider emoji after Markle’s name. “Narcissistic ” was always attached to MM’s name. It was very Lord of the Flies. I stopped following the site and I think it disappeared under the weight of it’s hate. Royal Foibles also did the “I like MM” comments that segued into the “narcissistic” commentary. Stopped following RF. Kept requesting money. Narcissistic, a royal talking point?
The old gal is sure doing a lot of talking these days, more so than ever in life lol.
What the reporters call narcissism, everyone else calls self protection. The game they were trying to make Meghan play was literally killing her.
The Queen (and courtiers) saw narcissism in Meghan but not her oldest sons and William? This explanation only confirms the racism that Meghan faced dealing with these people. Plus, didn’t the press last week say that the Queen hated Meghan soon after they started planning the wedding but now Hardman is saying it was after the Oprah interview? What’s the truth?
The constant narrative that the mixed race American actress was the worst thing to happen to the Royal Family is so disgusting. The racist, elitist, and misogynistic beliefs consistently being exposed are doing more harm to their brand than any granddaughter-in-law ever could.
I think the old lady knew where the narcissists were and it wasn’t those two. It’s hilarious how these people act like they know people who wouldn’t deign to spit on them if they were on fire.
I can’t remember who it was that once referred to Betty as an uneducated German housewife but I want to use the term now . I highly doubt that Betty the uneducated German housewife even knew what a narcissist was. And furthermore even if she did, there is nothing more narcissistic than thinking that people should bow to you and serve you because of an accident or birth
The late Queen’s nickname amongst her staff was Mrs Glucksberg. 😄
I think that we should assume that the commentators on Harry and Meghan have a seance constantly employed and that they hear voices.
This was from 2018:
Tennis great Serena Williams told People magazine that her friend Meghan was still grounded: “I’m like, ‘How are you?’ and she’s like, ‘No, how are you?’ and I’m like, ‘You’re so sweet, but I’m really asking — how are YOU?’”
“I’m like, ‘Meghan, stop being so nice … you’re the pregnant one, aren’t you supposed to have hormones, why are you so sweet?’ But that’s always been her.”
Such a narcissist!
Well, by being a British queen (monarch), she is automatically a narcissist. They always tell on themselves, you just have to listen!
So Meghan is the narcissist in a family who believes they’re divinely appointed by God to rule over other humans because of their special blood, who bestow themselves with titles and honors and who insist people call them your royal highness, your grace, sir, ma’am and expect deference from everyone around them. lol ok. I know what they are. Just call her an uppity n-word and be done with it.
Putting words into a dead woman’s mouth again, how distasteful.
Okay rotas. We get it. Betty was a miserable old racist who couldn’t stand the only WOC to marry into the BRF. Keep banging that drum. Outside the UK, this puts QE2 in a lousy light.
Karma dictates that all these reports of Betty’s bigotry and duplicity (whether true or not) become the official record and her permanent legacy.
Why is there are current cabal of old and middle-aged white male biographers who are all viciously smearing Meghan and using Elizabeth to do it? This smacks of a conspiracy, so what is driving it? To me, it’s deeply revealing about something in the English psyche being manifested. To use the late Queen as the vehicle to express their misogyny, racism, and resentment is an unintended form of self-condemnation. And really, why do these men hate Meghan?
I very seriously doubt that QE2 said Meghan was a narcissist. The queen’s generation didn’t really discuss or have awareness of personality disorders. While I think it’s great that people are now much more aware and willing to discuss mental health in general, to put those words in the dead queen’s mouth is disrespectful to the queen.
Apparently amongst all her other virtues, the queen was a trained psychiatrist. Or this Hardman gTuy is. Or it’s all bullshit trying to smear Meghan in the myriad ways the British papers have to make a pound (or several pounds) tearing Meghan down because it sells, most certainly not because it’s true. But I’ll be a sport. That whole family (excluding Harry) are narcissists and psychopaths and the queen once said that herself, I assure you.
Please, they are such idiots to keep this up. The real narcissists live in big palaces on salt island. The fact that they gleefully slander Meg while protecting Andrew, is all the proof that’s needed to see the real villains here. It’s disgusting, honestly seeing pegs collapse the monarchy will be interesting.
… the inner circle sensed the Queen believed…
That twaddle plus 5,000 iced-in ducks flying away with a frozen lake will get you a new lake, two counties over.
(Apologies, I was just watching Fried Green Tomatoes.)
These people are so desperately pathetic. I’d pity them — if they weren’t so destructive.
I just have to say. I would have been totally broken if I had even a bit of the constant deluge of hate that is directed at Meghan. Every single day for ten years. She is a saint. A strong and beautiful soul. One of those rare special people in this world you would be honored to have met.
Funny, they never talk about Queen Charlotte.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/mar/12/race-monarchy
Making shit up again willie boy
Yes. This is probably why he doesn’t do much “work”. He’s busy playing the “royal insider” or “friend of William’s or “friend of Kate’s” that always has random stories about what QEII was thinking or saying about Meghan. And always when the Sussexes have just been successful on a visit to a foreign country. Hmmm.
Asking for a friend…
The only “facts” that this author is giving is about the “patronages” that the Queen gave to Meghan.
Does anybody here have any information about the supposed “blowing up” problem with the patronages ? He seems to also accuse Harry. He says that Harry and Meghan embraced the assignments at first but then it blew up ?
Was there a problem very soon? Or is Hardman twisting facts?
What we know:
1) Meghan and Harry were hard-working and were going to the office almost daily, said Omid Scobie. As opposed to a certain other couple.
2) Harry said in Spare that there were so many demands, there was so much work that they were begging for more staff.
3) Meghan became pregnant rapidly, and suffered from serious depression caused by the onslaught of the British Media. A smear campaign that exploded after the successful tour in Oceania in late 2018.
4) Harry and Meghan were experiencing a lot of pain, tried to find a solution so they could work for the Queen elsewhere and GET LESS ATTENTION FROM THE MEDIA (a narcissist doesn’t wish for LESS attention by the way… ). Harry and Meghan’s propositions were REJECTED and THEN, only THEN, they threw the towel and got out of there.
What I would like to know is WHEN, in WHAT TIMELINE, Hardman puts the “it blew up”. If it’s when Harry and Meghan finally left , the story of Hardman, and the resentment of the Queen’s staff, are based on total refusal to see/understand the pain and the abuse Harry and Meghan suffered from.
Of course the patronages stuff blew up when they left. This had NOTHING TO DO with not appreciating the assignments, not being grateful, or being “difficult” or “narcissistic”. Total nonsense.
Over the years, I’m constantly flabbergasted at the media talking about what happened without even ACKNOWLEDGING the abuse. As if the abuse didn’t exist and was not at the CORE of Harry and Meghan’s decisions.
On the other hand, IF and it’s a big IF, there were some specific problems and Meghan (and/or Harry) made difficulties EARLY, BEFORE the smear campaigns got very loud, then I would like to know more details and more context.
Sorry for being so long, but asking for a friend… do you have some information about specific problems about the patronages, the National Theater and the like ?
“A narcissist would have had more self-preservation and demanded more control”: This exactly. In women, and this is especially true for people of color, ANY amount of not laying down and dying, not fawning, is going to be seen as “narcissism.”
A phenomenon I recently learned about is that people with actual, clinical NPD pathology have bad taste and can’t dress themselves, have to look outside themselves to copy styles, buy things just because they’re the ‘best’ (i.e. most expensive), and so on. As a result, their tastes tend to veer toward “tacky,” like having a gold toilet. NPD is the *opposite* of a “strong sense of self”; Megan’s self-certainty points, if anything, to a structural integrity of the self.