P6: Duchess Meghan is ‘basically the breadwinner’ but ‘money is tight’

Yet another pocket-watching story about the Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s finances. By my (non-Deranger) calculations, Meghan and Harry likely have close to $150 million in assets, investments and savings. Are they spending seven figures annually on security? Sure. But in the past six years, the Sussexes have done very, very well for themselves. They’ve done so well, it’s broken the brains of their haters. Derangers will swear up and down that Meghan and Harry have spent all of their Netflix money and Spare money and that As Ever is a flop, and something something, Harry needs to come crawling back to his brother!! That’s always the endgame, that was always the plan. Well, please enjoy Page Six’s latest exclusive about the Sussexes’ “tight” finances and how Meghan is “basically the breadwinner.” Get money, Meg!!

Meghan Markle is “basically the breadwinner” in the Sussex family — and funds are “tight,” sources tell Page Six. The Duchess of Sussex is focusing on growing her “As Ever” lifestyle range after recently parting ways with partner Netflix, those who know her say, while her husband, Prince Harry, is mainly focused on his philanthropic work, which is noble but doesn’t bring in much cash.

“Money is tight,” said a source in the know, as another told us that Markle and her husband, Harry, need at least $6 million a year for operating expenses in the billionaire enclave of Montecito, California.

As Page Six revealed, the couple spends about $3 million of that on private security for the family, which includes children Prince Archie, 7, and Princess Lilibet, 4. They also have to make mortgage payments on their $15 million mansion.

However, Markle has a coterie of wealthy and powerful female friends, all of whom are on board to help her boost her finances. Indeed, a video Markle posted on Instagram Monday to promote “As Ever,” featuring the mom of two eating a strawberry and wistfully staring out of the window, while wearing a $63,000 diamond necklace, which was liked by Lauren Sánchez Bezos and Markle’s close pal, IT Cosmetics founder Jamie Kern Lima.

We told how Kern Lima flew Markle to the G9 Ventures Summer Summit, hosted by investor Amy Griffin, in the Hamptons in July 2024, ahead of Markle’s business launch.

Last month, Markle, 44, joined AI-powered fashion discovery platform OneOff as both an investor and a featured participant, whose personal “exclusive edits” will be available to browse and buy. She joins other investors and featured celebrities like Suki Waterhouse, Emma Chamberlain, Kate Hudson and Shay Mitchell on the platform. This enables fans to shop her wardrobe, including outfits from her recent Australia tour. The move, which earns her a percentage from sales, drew criticism for potentially prioritizing profits over her philanthropic work.

More than two dozen products from the Aussie tour sold out, according to Markle sources, with OneOff cofounder and chief executive officer Emir Talu telling WWD, “OneOff surpassed 1-plus million views of outfits on the site in the first three days since Meghan launched her page on the platform.”

Netflix and Markle severed their “As Ever” partnership in April after we revealed her tie-in show, ‘With Love, Meghan” was not returning for a third season. Markle sources let it be known that she had been left to “carry the whole thing by herself” — much to the annoyance of Netflix staffers.

There have also been rumors Markle has been speaking to Hollywood bigwigs to start acting again. Sources this week even said the former “Suits” star, who made a cameo appearance in the upcoming movie “Close Personal Friends,” was looking for a steady role on a TV show, but this was roundly denied by Sussex insiders.

[From Page Six]

“Money is tight” and then they just list all of Meghan’s revenue streams and try to gloss over the fact that the Sussexes have easily made low nine-figures in six years, and that they still have a significant amount coming in, especially (IMO) from As Ever. The reason I know these people are unhinged and they don’t know what they’re talking about is that they never acknowledge how much money the Sussexes have left on the table. If H&M were *truly* struggling financially, they would have been desperate for any commercial work or brand deals. Instead, Harry is mostly focused on unpaid philanthropic work while Meghan invested in herself and started a business. None of that says “they’re almost broke!” It does say that Meghan is the breadwinner though, which… fair enough. She totally is. And it’s amazing.

Photos courtesy of Cover Images.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

5 Responses to “P6: Duchess Meghan is ‘basically the breadwinner’ but ‘money is tight’”

  1. Ameerah M says:

    She’s ALWAYS been the breadwinner lol. Even Harry has said that. Bro couldn’t even afford a couch when they were dating. But I do love how they keep conveniently forgetting all the money he made from Spare.

  2. Brit says:

    These magazines and commentators are increasingly angry because they don’t have access to their financials, lol. It’s so much projection as well. These newspapers aren’t doing well and the rota are losing jobs and going to Substack/youtube. They’re all over the place. It’s hysterical.

  3. anna says:

    so funny how they think writing this will presumably shame them? or embarrass harry? not him personally but perhaps in front of some ppl. anything to try to get rid of their support.

  4. Beth says:

    There are multi-millions already banked and invested. And he’s been CIO of BetterUp since 2021, a reportedly successful VC investor and sought after re: paid speaking engagements. Not to mention Archewell Productions (first look contract with Netflix with projects in the pipeline). That’s just what we know of 😅🤣😂

  5. YankeeDoodles says:

    I would guess — having worked in tv production then banking — that “security” is a business expense. Hence it is payable with pre-tax dollars. Which is what everyone does, whose work requires them to perform in public venues that need some scouting. Likewise if they work at home, their home office would need some on-site adjustments that would be business expenses. And one reason their work / philanthropic travel is blended, is that if they are generating income on those trips, some portion of travel budget and security is legitimately classed as business expenses. Those aren’t loopholes. It’s what everyone does. A small secret is that this is the reason why so many celebrities do charity work. It become a tax shelter in the US, because every dollar you donate to a non-profit is a dollar you can deduct from your tax bill. But the corollary is that the non-profit sector in the US is regulated with a stringent and financially driven ethos that demands those organisations generate results that are measurable. They allocate funding more like corporate investments, they have to show returns. I’m sure that’s one reason why Meghan was gobsmacked as they say here to realise how amateurish the whole charity scene is, around the royals.

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment