King Charles paid $41 million in taxes & he’ll never live in Buckingham Palace

Last week, Buckingham Palace announced that King Charles and the Prince of Wales would finally release their income tax returns. When Charles was PoW, he released more information about his taxes – from the Duchy of Cornwall income – but Prince William changed that in 2023. It took three-plus years, but now Charles feels like there should be more financial transparency with the Crown, so he released information about his income taxes from 2023-26. The king’s “income” mostly comes via the vast Duchy of Lancaster, which is probably worth well over $1 billion in real estate and investments.

King Charles is opening the books on his personal finances in a way no British monarch has before. Buckingham Palace announced that the King has paid more than $41 million (£30 million) in personal taxes since ascending the throne in 2022, marking the first time a reigning monarch has made the amount public.

The disclosure, released alongside the Royal Household’s annual financial report, offers an unprecedented glimpse into the King’s private finances as Buckingham Palace seeks to provide greater transparency around royal finances.

The more than $41 million figure represents taxes paid over nearly three tax years—not a single year. Buckingham Palace said Charles paid about $16 million (£11.7 million) in 2023-24 and about $17.7 million (£12.9 million) in 2024-25, in addition to taxes paid during the months immediately following his accession after Queen Elizabeth’s death in 2022.

Although Britain’s sovereign is exempt from paying income tax under law, Charles voluntarily pays income tax, capital gains tax and inheritance tax under an agreement with the government. He has also voluntarily paid taxes for decades, beginning during his time as Prince of Wales in the early 1990s after public debate over royal finances.

[From People]

$41 million in three years… and he’s paying inheritance tax?? No, he’s not. While I’m no tax expert, the numbers suggest that Charles is basically paying taxes on the Duchy of Lancaster’s investment “income” alone. Something I’ve always wondered about the Windsors and taxes is whether they declare their charitable giving and their charity-patronage work as well – it would be negligible in William’s case, but Charles is patron of so many charities and he has his own charitable trusts and foundations.

Meanwhile, alongside his tax information, Charles’ people slid in the confirmation to something we’ve known for years: Charles and Camilla will never move into Buckingham Palace. BP’s decade-long renovation will be completed next year, and Charles won’t move in.

King Charles and Queen Camilla won’t move into Buckingham Palace after a multi-million dollar, decade-long renovation is complete, the palace has confirmed. The update came on June 25 with the release of the annual Sovereign Grant Report, which outlines how taxpayer funding supports the royal family’s official duties and the upkeep of the occupied royal palaces during the 2025–2026 financial year.

Among the report’s notable revelations was confirmation that the King, 77, and Queen, 78, will not take up residence at Buckingham Palace after the Buckingham Palace Reservicing Programme concludes in 2027.

“It will be a buzzing hive of royal activity in every other way,” a palace spokesperson said. “His Majesty retains huge affection for Buckingham Palace and a deep respect for its role in royal and public life,” the palace said of the King’s feelings toward the royal family’s best-known London residence. “It will remain a working home but we are seeking to widen public access precisely to maximise the national benefit of a publicly-funded building.”

A statement elaborated that King Charles and Queen Camilla’s decision not to make Buckingham Palace a personal home reflects their wishes that the iconic royal residence “remains the ceremonial center of Royal life, the primary workplace of the Royal Household and a national heritage asset with increased opportunities for public access.”

It was previously determined in March that the 2026-27 Sovereign Grant would be set at $182 million to deliver funding for the last year of the Buckingham Palace Reserving Program, in a sum that will be reduced in the future.

[From People]

I’ve already seen republicans complaining about the waste of time, money and energy to renovate and update this crumbling palace. One criticism is: why didn’t they just decide to turn BP into a museum? The thing is, I’m pretty sure that’s Charles’ plan. He still wants to keep his offices there and some entertaining spaces, but Charles actually believes in opening up a lot of these royal properties to visitors and tourists. That being said, it was still a huge waste of money and effort. William has already said that his family won’t live in BP either.

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, Cover Images.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

12 Responses to “King Charles paid $41 million in taxes & he’ll never live in Buckingham Palace”

  1. Mightymolly says:

    To paraphrase the great Indy Jones, it [should be] a museum.

  2. julie says:

    Buckingham palace is part of the UK heritage and should be kept in good condition. It’s full of history and historical objects. The real challenge is to find a way to make it more profitable. The chateau de Versailles in France is a good site to study and maybe imitate. Maybe the UK govt should appropriate the space and have it fully used for commercial purpose.

    • Digital Unicorn says:

      Its being reported here that its going to stay open to the public longer and they are looking at other ways to make it ‘support’ itself – its also worth remembering that its also office space to the staff that support the Monarchy (not just the King) so its a working office as well.

      I can def see it becoming more open and eventually turned into some sort of museum.

  3. Amy Bee says:

    We now see why Charles and William are “disclosing” their taxes. It’s because they won’t be living in BP after getting the Government to pay over 350 million pounds to renovate it. I don’t even believe they’re paying their fair share in taxes.

  4. another cross to carry says:

    Scammers! Note that the report failed to mention the TYPE(S) of taxes the king paid. I would like to see a breakdown of the taxes into property taxes, sales/vat taxes, income taxes etc. I would like to know the tax paying entity(s). Are the taxes paid by the duchy being included? Are the taxes deducted from the sovereign grant?

    What taxes are we talking about here?

  5. Nanea says:

    “It will be a buzzing hive of royal activity in every other way,” a palace spokesperson said. “His Majesty retains huge affection for Buckingham Palace and a deep respect for its role in royal and public life,”

    What kind of royal activity?
    No royal is active in any sense of the word, especially not the Incandescent with Rage One.

    And public life?
    After the British taxpayers have forked over more than half a billion £££ because QEII neglected the upkeep of BP, despite pocketing hundreds of millions for necessary renovations and structural improvements *for decades*, the whole thing and everything in it should form part of a museum and collection.

    The BRF can have their “offices” that don’t really serve a purpose in one of their many other places.

    Abolish the monarchy.

  6. Sure says:

    Was all of the 350 million spent on BP? Honestly? Every last penny?

  7. Lady Digby says:

    Today’s BBC reportage is talking about RF’s soft power in promoting UK and specifically King successful visit to US. Inewspaper article states King and Queen carried out a total of 708 events last year, having almost no privacy and HAVING to shake hands with strangers! Obviously there is no similar reference to PoWs work statistics providing justification for their lavish lifestyle because they can’t! Junior just doing 57 events in six months is pathetic and merits decreased funding not a whacking pay rise!

  8. YankeeDoodles says:

    As a UK taxpayer I would urge they donate BP to the UK government to use as it sees fit. Could be the HQ for the NHS or the foreign office or the home office or the dept of culture, media and sport. I’m not joking. We do have a government that does a hell of a lot more advocacy and outreach than the BRF and none of it is optional or by the grace of some liege.

    • Preston says:

      Don’t those departments already have headquarters of their own? Probably in modern office buildings with the necessary technical infrastructure needed to run their divisions properly?
      Not everyone wants to work in a 300 year old mansion with 200 year old plumbing and HVAC.

  9. Paisley25 says:

    I hope this means they’ll open up the gardens year round. I think right now, they’re only accessible for 10 weeks in the summer when the late Queen was at Balmoral. It’s 39 acres!

  10. Visa Diva says:

    So I’m not mad they’re not going to not live there, it’s basically a fancy office building.

    I wonder if Parliament could move in? Westminster needs renovations that will take years and they need a place to meet, might as well use the space.

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment