Charles Spencer told Barbara Walters about Prince Charles’ despicable comments

Charles Spencer is in America this week for more book promotion. On Monday, he appeared, in person, at CBS Mornings’ studio for an in-depth conversation with Gayle King. Gayle has really made a name for herself with the royal coverage and royal-adjacent coverage, hasn’t she? And she pressed the Earl Spencer on his nephews and on whether he’s telling the truth about his recollections of what then-Prince Charles said to him after Princess Diana died. Once again, it’s worth noting that Buckingham Palace didn’t call Charles Spencer a liar. They tried to discredit him by saying that grief has clouded his memory, they tried to call him broke-ass, and they tried to say Spencer has an ax to grind. But the palace’s arguments simply make no sense, and most people feel like Spencer’s recollections of King Charles are completely in-character. Some highlights from the interview (I’m including the video below):

Buckingham Palace is big mad: “The part of the conversation they’re particularly upset by is when he said to me about Diana, ‘We’ll forget her soon enough.’ And I know I heard that. I’ve only had two conversations on the phone with the now-King, so it’s definitely the case.”

He told Barbara Walters about it at the time: “I told people at the time. I told Barbara Walters, actually, at the time. But they have to gaslight; they have to sort of pretend there’s something wrong with my mind or my memory. There’s nothing wrong with either.”

He’s been in touch with his nephews in the past week: Charles Spencer says he’s been in touch with Prince William and Prince Harry since the release of his new book about their mother, Princess Diana. During the interview, [Gayle] King said she was “curious about their reaction.” Spencer, 62, said, “I decided not to have anyone involved in the book, so no one knew about it except my wife, obviously, and the publishers. I didn’t tell any of the family until just before it was released publicly as a thing because I didn’t want anyone to think — particularly with Harry, who people know I had to stay in the summer — that he was in any way involved in this. It was really important for me that they weren’t.”

Whether William and Harry approve of the book: King then asked, “Have you talked to them after the book?” to which Spencer replied, “Yes, I have.” When she followed up by asking if his nephews “approve” of the book, Diana’s brother said, “I don’t know. I haven’t asked about approval. Harry was sort of like, ‘Is there anything in there that would be embarrassing to me?’ I said, ‘Absolutely not.’ I’m very specific about people’s privacy. I can say that Harry is completely fine about it. He said, ‘I hope there’s nothing embarrassing about him in it. I said, ‘There isn’t.’ I think they were actually worried where I was going up to with the book. It pretty much ends in 1997 with Diana’s death, and there’s a tiny postscript by the grave. So I think there was this, ‘Gosh, what’s he written about?’ And I think it’s natural that people so in the public eye are concerned how they will come across in the book. But I could reassure both of them that they’re, of course, in the book, but really as examples of two little boys who had the most exceptional mother; I’m not in any way compromising their privacy at all.”

[From People Magazine]

I really appreciate that he’s calling out the palace in real time. Did Buckingham Palace courtiers not realize that Spencer would be going on a full book promotion, and that he would be able to clap back on all of the palace’s ham-fisted talking points? At one point, Gayle mentions that Spencer is getting “a lot of criticism” for the book, and Spencer corrected her, saying: “Well, you say I’m getting a lot of criticism – I’m getting a lot of criticism FED by Buckingham Palace but not from other people.”

Photos courtesy of Cover Images, screencaps courtesy of CBS Mornings.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

20 Responses to “Charles Spencer told Barbara Walters about Prince Charles’ despicable comments”

  1. Nicki says:

    In a time when the most awful people have control of the public conversations, it’s deeply satisfying to see someone beat them at their own game.

  2. Tessa says:

    Good for him. Saying he’s getting a lot of criticism fed by Buckingham palace but not from other people . He’s telling it like it is.

  3. YankeeDoodles says:

    Having read the book and really enjoyed it, it is not about Prince Charles. This is yet another Streisand Effect moment for the royals. Charles bounces into the narrative a few times, like, a handful of times. The other several hundred pages on my Kindle are a really vivid portrait of growing up in that era, in those very peculiar circumstances that obtained after the aristocracy had been pretty well wiped out by a combination of war, taxes, and Labour politics, but before the Thatcher era prompted a re-boot of their vanished world, like some kind of imitation aristocracy made of people like Carole MIddleton and Hyacinth Bucket. It’s worth a read even if you don’t care at all about the Windsors, just as a portrait of the people in that culture & time.

  4. Barrett says:

    No matter what you think, “Carlos” Spencer is very adept at responding. He clearly has media training from his background and seems well prepared for all inquiries. He is confident in himself. I have my own opinions. I have every suspicion that King Charles was a petulant baby throwing temper tantrums when Diana died, especially when Carlos pushed him, rightly, so he would not have the boys walk behind Diana’s casket. Prince Phillip had common sense and knew Charles should never, in a million years, be centered behind Dian’s coffin. He understood the optics and the selfish reasons his problematic son wanted it to happen ( no people in the crowd shouting negative things at him). I am sure King Charles sounded like a wacko in conversations with Spencer. However, in my opinion, and I could be wrong, I doubt he sounded “giddy”; probably ” manic and selfish are my guess… again, I could be wrong.

    As a counseling grad student, I wonder whether King Charles has grown according to Erikson’s developmental model. Have cancer and age helped him regret his behavior, even though the palace’s response seems so immature? They should have said nothing instead. My fear is he still has not grown as a person.

    • Tis True, Tis True says:

      Always amused at this idea that “media training” is the reason why some people are enormously charismatic and able to speak eloquently in unrehearsed situations. You can’t teach what he’s doing, beyond an excellent childhood experience and schooling.

    • YepZee says:

      For your question about whether Charles Windsor has grown let me remind about the pen event during the coronation activities.

  5. Amy Bee says:

    If Charles didn’t say those words the Palace would have outright denied it. They never did

    • 2131Jan says:

      Charles Spencer is a respected historian and author. BP is probably afraid there are tapes somewhere (Tampon Tapes anyone?). Also, there were quite a few people CS told at the time it happened.

      It never fails to truly amazing how astoundingly stupid the Windsors are, that they never learned a thing from past mistakes, or even how to “read the room” so to speak. Harry, like his mother, seems to be the only one with any emotional IQ and common sense! The others all believe their own antiquated bullshit press, and think they are sooooo special.

  6. StillDouchesOfCambridge says:

    There is nothing that gives us more strength and will, than the true, pure love we have for a family member, with the objective to keep that person alive.

    Nobody knows what Spencer will do/can do to achieve this, for the memory of his sister Diana.

  7. StillDouchesOfCambridge says:

    There is nothing that gives us more strength and will, than the true, pure love we have for a family member, with the objective to keep that person alive.

    Nobody knows what Spencer will do/can do to achieve this, for the memory of his sister Diana.

    The palace should be scared.

  8. gaffney says:

    I love that Uncle Charles is out here correcting narratives in real time! I fell out with Gayle a long time ago so I wish this interview went to someone else.

  9. Jensa says:

    I don’t think the Palace anticipated that Charles Spencer would be so articulate and intelligent in interviews. He speaks about his recollections with conviction, is not rattled at all by the questions, and comes across as completely credible. They’d have been better off not issuing that statement, in my opinion, it has just thrown more light on everything.

  10. tamsin says:

    Love how Spencer clearly lets listeners know when they are being subjected to spin. Good time for him to be doing this when he has acquired self-discipline, clarity, and a body of work that gives him authority as a result of age and experience.

  11. Becks1 says:

    Charles spencer is very very good at this – he’s very clear in his pushback, he’s not aggressive or angry, just almost…I don’t know, I can’t think of how to put it, almost self-deprecating but not? He’s making his points very clearly and in very quotable soundbites – “are they furious or are they embarrassed?” and ” a lot of criticism FED by buckingham palace”….those are just really good responses.

    and the criticism IS being fed by BP – the pro BP talking heads all have the same points, the bots are out, etc.

    BP really just should have shut up and let this play out without any response.

    I also appreciate how it makes it clear that Harry in no way played a part in this book.

  12. ArtFossil says:

    It’s an extraordinary book. Especially on Audible with Charles’s narration. It’s intelligent, sensitive, compassionate and unflinching. There’s tragedy but also humor and joy. And he puts Diana’s life into context—her family and psychology, the culture, and the history of England and the monarchy.

  13. QuiteContrary says:

    I’ve just started the book and it’s beautifully and powerfully written.

    In these interviews, Charles Spencer comes off as more regal and dignified than KC. He’s beating them at their own game and they’d be wise to just zip it.

  14. Puff Updater says:

    CBS Hair & Make-Up did a lot better job on him than those crusty Brits at BBC etc. His ‘do looks totally News Anchor at Five. His Clap Back game is on point.

  15. Lily says:

    “I’m getting a lot of criticism FED by Buckingham Palace but not from other people.”

    Mike drop.

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment