The 2019 Oscars will go on without a host, and just a lot of A-list presenters

Presenter Warren Beatty onstage during The 89th Oscars at the Dolby Theatre in Hollywood, CA on Sunday, February 26, 2017.

For more than a month, the Academy has been trying to figure out what to do about their Oscar-hosting dilemma. Kevin Hart quit that bitch in a flurry of homophobia and controversy in the first week of December. Since then, it’s honestly felt like the Academy has been frozen, like deer in the headlights. They couldn’t figure out who to get to replace Hart, and they’ve got an enormous list of names of people who they could ask, and an even bigger list of names who will never be asked. This is now the latest the Academy has ever gone without confirming a host. So… what’s their solution? Their solution sounds like it was made by a committee, and that it will please absolutely no one.

The Oscars are poised to embark on one of the most radical reinventions in the awards show’s long history. For the first time in nearly three decades, the biggest night in movies plans to go without a host, individuals with knowledge of the plans told Variety.

Producers will select a crop of A-listers to introduce various segments instead of relying on one marquee name to kick things off in a monologue filled with Trump zingers, said the insiders. The producers and the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, the group behind the Oscars, are scrambling to line up top talent needed to carry the telecast, which is just six weeks from airing live — on Feb. 24 — from Hollywood’s Dolby Theatre. Hand-wringing at the Academy has been palpable.

As it stands, no new offers are out, nor are any expected to be made to a single potential host to fill the void left by Kevin Hart, who dropped out within hours of being selected when he refused to apologize for his past homophobic remarks that had resurfaced on Twitter.

Barring an eleventh-hour pivot by the Academy — in the event that a superstar host materializes — the show producers are moving forward with a broadcast that will focus on starry skits and play up a high-profile year for music in film, thanks to likely nominees Lady Gaga, Dolly Parton, and Kendrick Lamar, one individual involved with the show said.

[From Variety]

Variety goes on to detail how Kevin Hart could have potentially come back if he showed real remorse and issued a substantive apology, but the sources say that his “woe is me, gay people are bullying me” drama on Ellen DeGeneres’ show backfired with the Academy, and so Kevin is persona non grata now. As for the Academy’s idea to have no madman (or madwoman) helming the SS Oscartastrophe, obviously I think that’s a sh-tty idea. They’re trying to have it every way possible, rather than making a concrete decision and sticking to it. Mark my words, this year’s Oscars telecast is going to be a disaster with this format.

Speaking of disasters, The Hollywood Reporter claims that A-list celebrities were told, ahead of the Golden Globes, that if they decided to present at the Globes, they would not be invited to present at the Oscars. As in, celebrities had to choose – Globes or Oscars. The Oscars are more prestigious, obviously, but besides that, the Oscars have a MUCH better presenter gift bag. So obviously, some celebrities declined to present at the Globes. Margot Robbie was one of the people who declined, and now I wonder if they’re going to get Margot to do one of the big presenting-chunks at the Oscars.

Faye Dunaway and Warren Beatty present during the live ABC Telecast of The 89th Oscars at the Dolby Theatre in Hollywood, CA on Sunday, February 26, 2017.

90th Annual Academy Awards - Backstage

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

70 Responses to “The 2019 Oscars will go on without a host, and just a lot of A-list presenters”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Incredulous says:

    Ah yes, the Oscars, that most relevant of things. Do any of you care, other than the outfits on the carpet?

    • Alissa says:

      I actually care a lot haha. I don’t care too much about the red carpet, but the actual show I care about a lot. I’m not a fan of this decision.

    • Kat says:

      Agree, I only care about the outfits and any juicy gossip. I don’t need to watch the actual show, they all take themselves so seriously, it’s no fun.

      • Steff says:

        I used to really enjoy the Oscars and actually try to watch all the BP nominees, but the past 7 years have been different because I began to notice how much of a farce it truly was. I enjoyed seeing the horror on everyone’s faces with the Lalaland/Moonlight debacle though.

    • Nina says:

      To be honest, mostly just the outfits. I am curious who wins but I don’t watch live as I’m in a different time zone. Before the show was available online I would ask my uncle to tape it (he had a tape recorded that could do high quality and extra long tapes) and just fast forward the less interesting parts.

      About ten years ago I alsko new the films and actors nominated and had favorites and such. These days I have absolutely no time to keep up. When I watch a red carpet I don’t know who half the people are or what films are currently running. It has gotten too much.

  2. Chef Grace says:

    Steve Colbert. I want those Trump zingers.
    🙂

  3. Margo Smith says:

    They really want find anyone else… Really?! I find that very strange and hard to believe. Weird…

  4. RBC says:

    My son in law suggested Martha Stewart and Snoop Dogg would be rather entertaining as hosts. That would be must watch tv!!

  5. Alexandria says:

    I hope Tina Fey, Amy Poehler, Hasan Minhaj, Mindy Kaling, Rihanna get to present.

  6. STRIPE says:

    If it shortens the show, I’m here for it.

  7. SM says:

    The academy is nuts. Why you can’t present at the Oscars if you are at the GG? Geez, sounds like a lunch break in high school.

    • Eliza says:

      They think people tune in to see specific people present…

      … they haven’t gotten the memo that “the celebrity” has died. People no longer go to movies just to see their favorite actors why would they watch a show for 20 seconds of airtime?

      • Maddie says:

        Right? I never watch the Oscars in full. I might catch segments of it here and there, but I don’t care enough to watch. I love fashion, but the red carpet coverage is boring, so I’ll just look at the pics in the morning. If i like an actor who is presenting, I’ll just catch the clip on YouTube, no need to watch the whole show.

  8. Miss M says:

    Get the Broadway actors to present. They are used to perform live.😀

  9. Lightpurple says:

    They have done this before. Just move it along and give out the awards.

    • lucy2 says:

      Yeah I don’t know why they’re saying this is some “radical” change. It’s been done before. Many people suggested it when the Kevin Hart stuff happened. Streamline the process and keep it moving!

  10. Sayrah says:

    Was billy crystal unavailable?

  11. Mia4s says:

    I actually think this might help the ratings. People will tune in if they expect a trainwreck. As always I will watch the red carpet on mute, go to bed, and catch the highlights the next day.

    I used to watch it, but the campaigning has killed it for me. Months of insipid repetition, finding 8 million ways to say “I’m not hear to talk about Bryan Singer right now” (side-eyeing you Rami Malek), or just convincing us how important your movie is. IMPORTANT! Seriously once campaigning started it wasn’t enough for Black Panther to be wildly entertaining. It had to be IMPORTANT! 🙄 Campaigning and too many lead up awards shows killed the Oscars.

  12. Sayrah says:

    Honestly I’ve been turned off to awards shows since all the Harvey Weinstein news came out. That people are giving themselves awards for acting and fawning all over each other when shady shit is going on to get certain films and stars in the position to win is gross. And I used to be so psyched up to watch them every year. Blah, who cares if they cancel it.

    • Steff says:

      I know! So many Oscars are tainted by him.

    • Anname says:

      Same for me. Unless we are talking Denzel Washington or Meryl Streep, no one can even get a nomination without spending tons of money on campaigning. I like the fashion and the gossip, but don’t put a lot of stock into the awards themselves.

      Awards season lasts too long and by the Oscars, everyone is tired of hearing from the frontrunners. I can’t blame the actors though, being “Oscar-nominated” is still a huge thing for an actor’s career.

      • jan90067 says:

        Seriously, there are what… 7 Awards shows in 3 mos.! How much back-patting do these people need? We have GGs, Critics’ Choice, SAG, Directors’ Guild, Writers’ Guild, Producers’ Guild, and Oscars… It really gets to be exhausting by the time the Oscars come out!

  13. TeddyPicker says:

    I saw someone on Twitter suggest RuPaul, which I think would make for a fabulous show. (And think about the costume changes!!!)

    • Giddy says:

      That would really be “must see” tv.

    • Jamie says:

      That would be cool, but I really like the suggestion that the Muppets do it. Puppets can get away with a lot more than humans. Stadler and Waldorf can make fun of all the pompousness and the nominees. Miss Piggy can do jokes about not being nominated herself. etc. etc.

      • Rosie says:

        I would stay up and watch that live.

      • Mia4s says:

        The Muppets would absolutely bring me back to the show! And yes I’d watch live! 😁

        Unfortunately because the Muppets have that subversive side to them, the super self-important Academy would never go for it.

  14. Aren says:

    I really think this is going to improve ratings because a lot of people just want to see the awards and the actors, not some comedy set.
    Not everybody has the same type of humour either, so to me this is a great choice.

  15. Case says:

    I think this is fine. I love award ceremonies, but not because of the hosts — I’m genuinely interested in who will win. This will shorten the program significantly, which might help ratings as well — it typically goes on until midnight, and that’s just a bit too late for a late for people on Sunday night.

  16. Marianne Hord says:

    Im fine with this. The last good host they had was Hugh Jackman anyway. You can still funny moments with the presenters, and hopefully this cuts down the time somewhat. Besides, I know I tune into the oscars because I want to see who wins and hear their speeches (plus for the fashion). Its not like a host with the clincher for me.

  17. Mabs A'Mabbin says:

    Maybe they should make, without pay, all ousted industry criminals do it in orange jumpsuits. Isn’t orange the new black?

  18. Svea says:

    Will that include a bunch of old doddering white guys like the Golden Globes?

  19. Amelie says:

    The Oscars not having a host has been done before… not in awhile but it’s not a new precedent and I have better things to worry about than worrying about the fact it doesn’t have a host. It’s truly not the end of the world and I think it’s better this way and might make the telecast shorter. I didn’t even watch the Globes this year. Watched about 5 minutes of it before I shut it off and said “I can see all the outfit coverage tomorrow.” I hardly watch live TV anymore anyways as I haven’t had a cable subscription in over a year. Most people my age don’t.

    • Marianne says:

      This is why I think the Oscars and other award shows should look into streaming on youtube. They can still air on TV too for those who prefer it that way, but I think they would grab a much bigger audience since a lot of people dont have cable anymore. You could still run ads, and also it would be more accurate in calcuating exactly how many people are watching.

  20. Forwhatitsworth says:

    Rachel Bloom! How amazing would a Crazy Ex Girlfriend style song and dance be for the opening number? Maybe add in a little Tituss Burgess for good measure?

  21. Lala11_7 says:

    I actually PREFER this route…The Oscars put on a magnificent enough production without having a personality drive it…the Oscars IS the personality…

  22. Dr Mrs The Monarch says:

    This is going to be a sad spectacle of who the Academy “thinks” is an A-list star.

  23. Agirlandherdog says:

    I watched Kevin Hart’s interview on GMA yesterday. I’m assuming the producers of The Upside were setting up the apology tour so their movie doesn’t tank. Except Kevin is not inclined to play along. I’ve always enjoyed his movies, but I’ve never seen his stand up or any interviews with him. After watching that interview, I can’t really see myself ever enjoying any of his movies anymore. I’ll just always be thinking what an unmitigated ASS he is. Seriously, he was such an ass in that interview. Poor Michael Strahan was just trying to steer him in the direction you could tell the interview was supposed to take, and Kevin just refused. He was borderline belligerent. His rationale is that he already apologized, and he shouldn’t have to keep apologizing. Except his apology kind of lacks … sincerity. And his increasingly bullish attitude just makes more of a mockery of that supposed apology.

    • Lala11_7 says:

      I remember when I FIRST saw his stand-up routine…YEARS AGO…and it was full of homophobic crap…and him dragging his “then” wife and kids FOR FILTH…I cancelled his trifling a– at that VERY moment….

      If I NEVA see him again…

      It will be too soon…

  24. CairinaCat says:

    Kevin Hart is a d*ck that abused his first wife and threatened abuse on his kid. He hates gay people, that’s pretty obvious.
    He can be funny, if you can get past all the screaming.
    He is funny in a cast (jumangi) but not funny enough to carry a movie
    He won’t be a “thing” for long because he is not exceptional as a comedian or an actor, and because he is a awful person.

  25. Helen says:

    it would help if they paid the hosts. and hired someone like hasan minhaj, a perhaps lower-profiled “comedian” who would not be an ungrateful prick unappreciative of the platform hosting the oscars would provide.

    they could also ask michelle wolf, she would be great.

    and if best picture is between “green book” and “bohemian rhasody”… see you in 2020, academy.

  26. Other Renee says:

    Oscars: “We couldn’t find anyone who actually wanted the crappy gig of hosting then getting roasted the following day in the media for doing such a crappy job on our overly-long crappy show… BUT we still expect you all to tune in and watch the train wreck for 3.5 hours! After all, THE SHOW MUST GO ON!”

  27. Skipper says:

    Why not have a fine actress or actor with a fine career, well respected. Not some comedian who reads jokes that are often not really funny and the hours drag on. I have two nominations:
    Tom Hanks or Meryl Streep. Both are super. Both also are politically astute to read the anti Trump jokes surely to be part of the TelePrompTer.

  28. Kate says:

    I’m not surprised. The whinners have made picking a host so problematic that the Academy have just thrown their hands up in the air and said f@ck it. This is what happens when you cave in to the mob.

  29. Anare says:

    Open the show with the president of the academy welcoming everyone. Have the Price Waterhouse people wave and try to look competent and then roll the first set of presenters. Scratch all dopey skits. Only extraneous performances would be the best songs. Done and probably at a reasonable time too. Why is this causing such handwringing?

  30. Pandakeeper says:

    Oprah?.

  31. A says:

    Every year we have this same conversation about awards shows and their ratings, and every year the conversation goes nowhere. Frankly, I’m tired. I think people are stoking this discussion for the sake of having a discussion, and not because they want any concrete solutions.

    Instead of sitting around questioning how meaningful the ceremony is in our day and age, just do away with it entirely if it’s not bringing the ratings. No red carpet, no acceptance speeches, no host, no monologue, no press release, no nothing. Just mail the winners with the information that they won, and let the speculation begin.