Prince Harry is gearing up for a security fight & Meghan delayed a new podcast?

I have to keep reminding myself that the Invictus Games are coming up, at long last. We’ve been waiting so long and the Vancouver-Whistler games are almost here. They start on February 8th, but Prince Harry will likely arrive a few days beforehand. Hopefully, Meghan will be there for the whole thing, but nothing has been confirmed. Anyway, this is another reminder that we’re seeing a ratcheted-up negativity about the Sussexes in anticipation of Invictus. The games are usually the Sussexes’ best press all year, and Invictus is arguably Harry’s signature achievement. Expect a lot of bullsh-t coming from the media and the Windsors, timed specifically around the games. Speaking of, Hello Magazine ran this exclusive about how Harry is gearing up for his big royal protection fight in the UK, like… sources claim that’s his big focus right now. I doubt it, but I’m sure British commentators want to believe it.

For the Duke of Sussex, this was personal. He had vowed to make his crusade against the newspapers that harmed him and those closest to him his “life’s work”. So while he didn’t have his day in court, the apology and eight-figure payout he accepted for “serious intrusion” into his private life and that of his late mother Diana, Princess of Wales, will have brought some closure last week.

“It’s just wonderful that Harry fought for – and gained – an apology to his mother,” his uncle Earl Spencer said afterwards adding, “She would be incredibly touched at that and rightly proud.”

The Duke’s settlement with News Group Newspapers has also left him free to focus on his next move. He had been due to take the witness stand in mid-February, straight off the back of the 2025 Vancouver-Whistler Invictus Games, but can instead head home to be with Meghan, Prince Archie, five, and Princess Lilibet, three.

His legal battles are far from over however, with Harry now focused on taking the fight for his family’s protection to court in April. And his next case that may prove decisive in his relationship with his father King Charles. Harry’s lawyers will appeal a High Court judgement upholding a Home Office decision to downgrade his security provision in the UK when he stepped back as a senior working royal in 2020.

A friend tells HELLO! “The goal for Prince Harry is simple. He wants to ensure the safety of himself and his family while in the UK so his children can know his home country and so he can help support his patronages and their important work.”

So could the stalemate finally be broken in the High Court this Spring? If the Duke were able to successfully appeal the ruling on his security, it could pave the way for him to build bridges with his father and bring his children back to visit. “The next case is fundamentally important to him in terms of his family,” says a source who has known Harry for many years.

Last week’s court victory, while unrelated to the next one, will no doubt have boosted his morale.

“It’s not quite the end of the story for him, but it’s a major chapter that’s been closed and dealt with,” adds the source.

It also came as a silver lining in a very challenging week for the Duke and Duchess. The settlement came amid fresh scrutiny of him and wife Meghan in the United States after a bruising 8,000-word profile of them in Vanity Fair, the magazine dubbed America’s “celebrity bible”. The takedown landed days after Meghan was forced to postpone the launch of her new Netflix lifestyle series With love, Meghan, until March 4 to “focus on the needs of those impacted by the wildfires” in her home state of California.

HELLO! understands that a series of new podcast episodes from Meghan has also been pushed back as a result.

[From Hello]

First of all, you’re telling me that Meghan also delayed a new podcast because of the Southern California fires? Huh. I mean… it might be true, but I just don’t think she would drop a podcast alongside her Netflix show? They would be competing with each other in a sense? As for the stuff about Harry’s big security fight… I find it exhausting. I know he wants to leave no stone unturned, but I’ve wanted him to quit that particular fight for years now. He’s made his point, and people who have paid attention to the years-long battle know how badly he got screwed over, and how his father was totally fine putting Harry and his family in extreme danger with no protection. That’s reason enough not to trust anyone in the institution ever again.

Photos courtesy of Cover Images, Lemonada Media.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

41 Responses to “Prince Harry is gearing up for a security fight & Meghan delayed a new podcast?”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. SarahLee says:

    I think he wants to be able to safely visit the UK with his family. Right now, he doesn’t feel safe bringing Meghan and the children. I think he wants them to know his country. That’s normal.

    • Lady Esther says:

      Agree, and he also wants to put RAVEC and the BRF’s involvement (read: total control) over security for any member of the RF on trial. I know a lot will be redacted for “security reasons” but I bet there will be at least some facts we didn’t know about come to light…

      I think the RAVEC lawsuit is at least as important as the press cases. The hacking was mainly about his past, but the security is mainly about his (and his family’s) future. It’s important if he has any hope to keep future arrangements with King William regarding security as good as they can be. Ringfence whatever arrangements are reached with a court win

    • Hypocrisy says:

      But having to fight this hard to get security, could he ever truly be able to trust? The people that decided to pull it in the first place are still running the show and have control.

      • That is true. I don’t know that I would be able to trust them ever again but I believe that Harry does want to visit the UK more and will need the security so he will trust it as much as he can.

      • Lady Esther says:

        I would think Harry relies on a combination of his private security and the Met police tasked with security for the royals; he wouldn’t put himself or his family all in UK police protection hands. Doubtless his private security, even though not authorized to carry weapons in the UK will know if their UK counterparts aren’t holding up their end

      • Kingston says:

        Folks need to rmbr that the security H is fighting for is one that will allow HIS OWN PRIVATE SECURITY TO BE ABLE TO CARRY GUNS WHILE HE’S IN THE UK.

        For that to happen, he will need the presence & authorization of the Met. Pol.

        Throughout his life, H has had no more than 3 bodyguards (Met) wherever he went….even at school. But even after he married M, their security wasn’t increased so it is not as if he’s now asking for an army to protect his family when he takes then to the uk as he wants to do.

        He will certainly be able to hv an “army” but this wd be an “army” comprising his own private security team, ARMED TO THE TEETH! (and prolly including experienced marksmen & anti-terrorism experts.)

      • Jan90067 says:

        Kingston, I believe, also, that in addition to his own security being armed, what Harry is looking for is for his team to be in the loop of the “chatter” from the threats to him and his family, that only the policy are privy to at this point.

      • Christine says:

        I agree with Jan. This is about the Met refusing to share credible threats against the Sussexes with their private security. They are never going to travel to the U.K. without their own security again, they just want their team to have all possible information.

        It’s fucking ridiculous that Harry still has to fight for this, what in the hell do these idiots think is going to happen if a hair on Harry’s head is harmed while he is in England? Look at the backlash the monarchy faced when Diana died, and she was on foreign soil.

      • Friendly Crow says:

        Harry has adhd. Many neurodivergent people have what is called “a strong sense of justice”.

        I don’t believe he trusts any of the officers that would be assigned to them or any security offered to them. But it’s more than the principle of the thing. It’s about publicly correcting and releasing the accurate the narrative which makes them safer.

      • Jais says:

        Many neurodivergent people have a strong sense of Justice? Lol, well that explains my life. Gonna have to look that one up.

      • bisynaptic says:

        @Friendly Crow, I’ve never heard/read that Harry has ADHD; and I seriously doubt that he does. He’s displayed the kind of executive functioning that people with untreated ADHD don’t have.

      • Friendly Crow says:

        Harry said he has adhd in spare.

        I’m currently up to my eyeballs in neurodivergent traits etc. Pattern recognition and a strong sense of justice are baseline traits. Very common.

    • ML says:

      According to “a friend,” this is true. Can I imagine Harry wanting to be able to bring Meghan and the kids to Britain safely? Yes. Do I believe a “friend” of his stated this about bringing his children with no mention of Meghan whatsoever? No.

      • HeatherC says:

        IDK, it could be a matter of context. My good friend’s husband is from Poland and they have 3 kids. He says all the time he can’t wait until the baby (6 months old) is older so he can bring her to Poland to see his culture. Of course he also means his wife and other two kids (who have already gone and spent a good amount of time, Baby was a suprise….)

        And also, if this is a real quote from a “friend,” I doubt it would be the whole quote anyway. They love to do that as well, twist context and words.

      • Kingston says:

        @HeatherC :

        ProTip: Theres no “friend” of H&M who speaks anonymously to the shitmedia (including ‘hello’)

    • Ginger says:

      Agree SarahLee

    • Friendly Crow says:

      I also believe that his tenacity in fighting for security isn’t just about himself and his family. Much like the apology he received for his mother, her supposedly “rejecting” security has been highly contended.

      I think he wants / needs his fight for security as well as the very real threats against him and his family documented in the public sphere. It’s vitally important – not just for his safety in the UK – but for the protection provided for him anywhere they travel too.

      Harry is brilliant and very intelligent- and his strategy has served him and his family very well. He knows what he is doing and he has also surrounded himself with incredibly intelligent people. Which frankly – so many people fail to do. Yet another indication of his intelligence level. The very smartest people know that they know a fraction of what there is to know and hire accordingly.

      I think that if he is continuing to pursue this that it’s something that is obviously very important. Probably for many reasons we aren’t aware of. I trust Harry. He knows what he is doing and he knows what’s best for him and his family.

      I don’t think it’s fair to place demands on him that he stop this or do this instead. He is in a unique position. Literally there is no play book. He and Meghan and their children are in a position that there is no modern equivalent for.

      They are both brilliant and they have beyond earned our trust in their actions – not that they need it.

    • bisynaptic says:

      #TeamHarry

  2. Dee(2) says:

    Well they just say that the podcast episodes have been pushed back not when they were going to drop initially. If the show would have debuted in January as planned, it’s perfectly believable and not stepping on projects for the podcast to come out in March or April. It would make sense to push everything back by 2 months if that’s the case. Also she wasn’t forced to delay it she chose to delay it, but I suppose if you phrase it that way it gives her agency and control and can’t have that.

    As for Harry I understand why he won’t drop the case. I wouldn’t trust anyone that works for his father or brother as far as I could throw them, but this is his country of birth. I would probably be pretty Disturbed if I couldn’t show my kids safely a lot of my home country, where I have fundamental memories of places and experiences and people who live there that I love. It’s not reasonable suggested expect everyone to fly to California, and it still doesn’t allow Archie and Lily to enjoy the things about the UK that he loves.

    • Tessa says:

      Meghan needs to be there with her husband and children when or if they visit. It sends a bad message that she is not wanted there and stirs up bots that he is “smart” to “leave her home.”

      • V says:

        It also reads at how racist the royal family are that they would remove royal protection from the SON of a King…. Working or non working he cannot change that fact he is the son of the king. He married a woman of color and they are making him pay. QE made him pay, King Charles is making him pay, and William / Kate are making him pay. The recent article about Kate wanting to see Harry made no mention of Kate fixing things with Megan… why would Kate? Megan is a lowly colored woman to her….

  3. B says:

    Good Luck to Harry. He and his family should get the proper level of security so that they can safely visit the UK. Meghan delaying her new new podcast supports my theory that ARO, With love Meghan and her new podcast are all connected. If true one being pushed back would impact the other. Fingers crossed we are getting our own little Meghan lifestyle universe in 2025!!

  4. SAS says:

    They’re not always concerned about doing things non-traditionally- podcast companion episodes for her series would be pretty creative and a nice way to go deeper with some of her guests (and also capture a slightly different market of people?).

    A totally unrelated podcast (2nd series of Archetypes 🙏🙏🙏) would be an odd choice for this time. But perhaps it was due to be released 2-3 months after With Love which would necessitate an equivalent delay?

  5. Noor says:

    Prince Harry and his family faced credible security threats. Therefore they deserve the state protection, just like a former PM or individuals like Salman Rusdie

  6. Nanea says:

    As Hello is speculating about Archetypes II, probably just based on that Lemonada post on Insta where they shared a collage of photos from various podcasts, I’d like to speculate too.

    Maybe Archetypes II was planned for, let’s say, mid-March and, as WLM has been moved to March 4, had to be moved too?

    I’m not sure what to believe though, as I don’t think Emily Nash has any kind of insider info.

  7. Amy Bee says:

    My guess is that Meghan’s podcast was always going to come out later in the year and I suspect the friend and the source who’s known Harry for years are members of the Royal rota.

  8. somebody says:

    Odd that I can find NO other sources online calling VF “America’s celebrity Bible”. Could it be this liar is lying again?

    • Dee(2) says:

      That’s just them trying to rely on the reputation of American media to whitewash their obsession. They want to say, see American Media hates them too so you should as well!! Ignoring that nonsense was the best move, because even the BM isn’t too focused on that any more, and it was supposed to be devastating.That’s why they’re back to the word count for some reason of articles, as if that has bearing on what’s said in it.

    • Jais says:

      It’s also funny that Hello mag is calling it a “takedown” bc there are people out there claiming it was fair and balanced. If it was so fair how can it also be called a takedown? And celebrity bible? Lol

  9. Jais says:

    So I get Harry wanting to leave no stone unturned. from what I can tell, this is the last appeal he can do? So might as well finish it out.

  10. Eurydice says:

    Why would he drop the case 2 months before going to trial? Now is the time when people get scared and want to settle. That might not be true in this case, but he’s waited this long – what’s another 2 months?

  11. Cj says:

    1. Hilarious to have a Spencer say his mum would be proud he fought for her to have an apology – a little Willy snake who slithered under a rock with his hush money from news corp must be fuuuuming. Cant wait to see what he does that shows he’s “just like diana” to try and have payback

    2. She wasn’t forced to postpone Netflix? She chose to move it out of respect? They really don’t like the idea that she could graciously consider others and put that first over her own interests. Maybe empathy is too foreign a concept for them.

    3. I’m sure he still wishes he could show his kids the people and places in the uk he loves. Not sure that will ever include his immediate family. Charles isn’t going to pull a 180 on showing interest just because security exists all of sudden.

    • Tessa says:

      It would be wrong on so many levels if he took the children and left Meghan home to visit the UK. Such disrespect to Meghan. Both parents should be there and Meghan should not be isolated. Really sends a bad message.

  12. Laura D says:

    Where none of this adds up for me is why is Harry (and his family) being treated differently to other high profile visiting dignitaries. Yes, I know he is English by birth but, he’s not an ordinary British citizen. If ANYTHING happened to him (or Meghan) whilst he was over here the headlines around the world would be scathing. Seriously, I just don’t understand why the government are allowing KCIII and his vile heir to get away with this.

    • Mads says:

      Because a successful Harry and Meghan outside the institution is a threat and the establishment will work with the palace to prevent that.

      The smear campaign, stripping security etc are all part of a combined strategy to ensure the institution keeps control. The royals worst nightmare is Harry and Meghan, with the children, being able to securely come and go as they please making visits to their patronages and generating positive coverage on social media – the MSM would still be negative.

      Whatever Harry has discovered in the pre-trial submissions has made him choose not to stay at any of the accommodation controlled by the institution and that speaks volumes about his lack of trust in the institution and his family.

  13. Tessa says:

    Their children . Not just his children. Both Harry and Meghan should both be able to go to the UK and take the children along. With security assured them.

  14. Enza says:

    Well I hope the peeps in the CBSA (Canada Border Services Agency) deny or delay entrance to the Daily Mail etc because they are cretins.

    Invictus Vancouver Whistler will be glorious–full of sunshine and joy.

  15. Lisa says:

    It will never be safe for them in the UK! I wish he would give up the fight! Even if he wins protection he won’t be able to trust them! Let it go! He can trust his own protection!

  16. Angied says:

    Harry may lose this case but at least he can look his children in the eye and say I did everything possible to get you security to visit the country of my birth. Unlike his weasel of a brother and coward father. What can they say? We blocked you and your parents getting security because of jealousy of your father. Yes the fifth in line was such a huge threat to us we didn’t want him visiting and bringing his children. What a bunch of losers.

  17. Beverley says:

    The rota rats criticizing Harry for not bringing his children (no mention of Meghan, ever) to his birth country would be the very same ones stating how dumb Harry is should something unspeakable happen to him or his children while they were in England.

  18. Renee says:

    Who are we tell him to stop fighting to go back to his homeland with security of life for himself and his family? Seriously, his mom is buried in that soil, he grew up there….its not unreasonable to want to go back there to visit once in a while and take his wife and kids eith him and let them be safe there.